OpenAI's Decade: From Nonprofit Lab to $500B Empire – The Rift Between Musk and Altman

Deep News12-12 16:10

On December 11, 2015, OpenAI was born as a nonprofit research lab with the noble mission of "developing AI for the benefit of humanity." A decade later, the company has transformed into a commercial giant valued at $500 billion, while its co-founder Elon Musk and CEO Sam Altman evolved from partners into fierce competitors.

The rift began with OpenAI's shift from nonprofit to commercialization. Musk, who left OpenAI to establish rival xAI (now valued at $230 billion), has engaged in legal and public battles with Altman. Musk accused OpenAI of betraying its founding mission, attempted to block its for-profit transition, and even proposed a $97.4 billion acquisition.

OpenAI's transformation—from nonprofit to public benefit corporation—has reshaped the AI race. Three years after ChatGPT's launch, weekly users exceed 800 million, driving its valuation to unprecedented heights.

Today, OpenAI faces intense competition from Google, Anthropic, Meta, and Musk's xAI. The company plans to invest $1.4 trillion in AI infrastructure, dwarfing rivals. Analysts question whether this aggressive spending will make OpenAI the next Google or repeat Netscape's downfall.

**Idealistic Beginnings: $1B Pledge and Nonprofit Vision** On December 11, 2015, Musk joined Peter Thiel and Reid Hoffman in pledging $1 billion to establish OpenAI as a research lab free from commercial pressures.

Yet reality soon clashed with idealism. In 2016, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang delivered a $300,000 DGX-1 supercomputer to OpenAI’s San Francisco office. Huang later admitted he "turned pale" upon learning it was for a nonprofit.

By 2017, cracks emerged. Musk emailed co-founders: "I’m done. This is the last straw," threatening to withdraw funding if OpenAI became a startup. Altman replied: "I remain passionate about the nonprofit structure!"

**Partnership to Rivalry** Musk exited OpenAI’s board in February 2018, citing potential conflicts with Tesla Motors' AI work. The truth was more complex. In 2024, he sued OpenAI and Altman, alleging betrayal of its mission and criticizing its Microsoft ties. He even offered $97.4 billion to reclaim control.

OpenAI completed restructuring in October, adopting a nonprofit-controlled for-profit model (OpenAI Group PBC). Meanwhile, xAI nears a $15 billion funding round at a $230 billion valuation, escalating Musk-Altman tensions.

Other early members also turned rivals. Siblings Dario and Daniela Amodei left in 2020 to found Anthropic, now seeking $350 billion valuation with Microsoft-Nvidia backing. Its Claude models rival OpenAI’s GPT.

**Trillion-Dollar Gamble: AI Infrastructure Arms Race** Facing competition, Altman bets on outspending rivals. OpenAI’s $1+ trillion infrastructure plan—focusing on data centers and chips—far exceeds Anthropic’s $100 billion commitment.

Analysts question sustainability. ISG’s David Menninger notes: "Vendors are making massive bets, but will returns follow?" D.A. Davidson’s Gil Luria calls OpenAI’s projections "fantastical," while Altman insists demand justifies spending, forecasting $20 billion annual revenue by 2024 and "hundreds of billions" by 2030.

Oracle signed a $50 billion deal to supply OpenAI, while AMD and Broadcom baked OpenAI-driven demand into forecasts. Menlo Ventures’ Matt Murphy dubs this the "mother of all waves," with potential trillion-dollar outcomes.

**Code Red: Strategic Pivot Under Pressure** After Google’s Gemini 3 launch, Altman declared "Code Red," reallocating resources to boost ChatGPT’s speed and reliability while delaying ad/health projects.

On Thursday, OpenAI released ChatGPT-5.2, touted as "the best system for daily professional use," alongside a $1 billion Disney deal for Sora AI video tools. Altman downplayed Google’s threat, noting Gemini’s impact was milder than feared.

"When competition strikes, you focus and adapt fast," said Altman, predicting OpenAI will exit Code Red by January 2025.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment