Will CoreWeave Turn Into the Next Silicon Valley Bank by 2026?

Deep News10-20 22:46

Yields on CoreWeave, Inc. (ASX: CRWV) unsecured bonds have surged to 15%, rekindling market worries about whether the AI infrastructure investment cycle can continue. But Barclays argues investors may be repeating the mistake of the 2023 Silicon Valley Bank crisis, misreading one company's localized credit risk as a systemic crisis across the entire industry.

According to the Financial Times, Ajay Rajadhyaksha, Barclays' global head of research, pointed out that the sell-off in CoreWeave, Inc. (ASX: CRWV) unsecured bonds mainly reflects their lower repayment priority within the company's capital structure, rather than a crack in the AI capital spending cycle. He believes figures such as Chamath Palihapitiya and Elon Musk have overinterpreted the signal sent by this batch of unsecured bonds, which amounts to only about US$2 billion.

Judging by market performance, the impact of this fluctuation is far smaller than the all-out panic during the 2023 Silicon Valley Bank crisis. The Nasdaq 100 fell 5.5% last week and has already rebounded somewhat this week, while bond yields of other hyperscale cloud providers have also eased as the US Treasury market stabilized. So far, the market has not seen a clear signal of a broad contraction in AI infrastructure financing.

A surge in unsecured bond yields does not equal a broken financing chain

CoreWeave, Inc. (ASX: CRWV) financing structure mainly consists of secured loans, convertible bonds and unsecured bonds, whose repayment priorities and risks differ significantly. The company mainly issues secured delayed draw term loans (DDTL) through independent special purpose vehicles (SPVs), collateralized by GPU hardware, customer contracts and data center leases. The US$8.5 billion DDTL 4.0 issued in March this year, backed by a multi-year "take-or-pay" contract with Meta, carried a spread of SOFR plus 225 basis points and a Moody's rating of A3.

But CoreWeave, Inc. (ASX: CRWV) financing costs are rising: the US$3.1 billion DDTL 5.0 issued in May saw its spread widen to SOFR plus 450 basis points; the US$2.6 billion DDTL 5.5 issued in August pushed the spread further to SOFR plus 550 basis points. At the same time, the company has issued about US$9 billion of convertible bonds over the past year, with coupons ranging from 1.75% to 2.875%. Although a September convertible bond issue was upsized from US$3 billion to US$3.7 billion, the falling share price is putting pressure on this financing channel.

The unsecured bonds that were sold off sit at the very end of the capital structure. Rajadhyaksha noted that in liquidation, hundreds of billions of dollars of senior claims still stand ahead of this batch of bonds, so the 15% yield reflects more their own high risk than the financing conditions of the entire industry.

He compared it to mortgages and credit cards: high credit card rates do not mean the mortgage market across the whole city is in trouble. Rising financing costs are worth watching, but they cannot be used to conclude that the AI infrastructure financing chain has already broken.

CoreWeave's limited scale makes it hard to shake the trillion-dollar AI investment cycle

Even if CoreWeave, Inc. (ASX: CRWV) ran into trouble, its impact on overall AI infrastructure investment could be relatively limited. Rajadhyaksha pointed out that the company's 2026 capital expenditure guidance is US$35 billion to US$39 billion, while the five major hyperscale cloud providers—Microsoft, Meta, Alphabet, Amazon and Oracle—are expected to spend a combined US$725 billion to US$800 billion on AI infrastructure this year, with spending potentially exceeding US$1 trillion in 2027.

On that basis, CoreWeave, Inc. (ASX: CRWV) spending accounts for only about 4% to 5% of the industry total. Even if the company stopped spending entirely, overall AI capital expenditure would fall by only about 4% to 5%; if spending were halved, the impact would be about 2%. Rajadhyaksha believes that even based on industry spending exceeding US$1 trillion in 2027, the gap created by halving CoreWeave's spending would be about US$20 billion, not enough to end the entire investment cycle.

Another risk the market worries about is credit contagion: if CoreWeave, Inc. (ASX: CRWV) runs into problems, does that mean hyperscale cloud providers such as Google will also face financing difficulties? Rajadhyaksha believes that inference jumps across far too many links. Microsoft, Meta, Alphabet and Amazon have stronger free cash flow support and rely less on the unsecured bond market.

Credit risk at a computing power supplier that relies heavily on external financing does not mean the entire AI investment chain will fall into a financing predicament.

The real risk signal: whether computing power prices collapse

Rajadhyaksha pointed out that what truly deserves vigilance is not CoreWeave, Inc. (ASX: CRWV) bond yields, but whether computing power prices fall sharply. The business model of AI infrastructure companies such as CoreWeave is essentially to buy GPUs and rent out computing power, using rental income to cover financing costs, equipment depreciation and operating expenses. Once computing power rental prices fall and revenue is insufficient to cover costs, a company's profitability and debt-servicing capacity could deteriorate at the same time, and only then would the AI investment cycle face a more substantive challenge.

At present, supply chain data does not yet clearly point to this scenario. TSMC's results reflect that chip demand is still growing, ASML's order backlog shows demand for related equipment remains strong, and hyperscale cloud providers' capital expenditure plans have not yet shown obvious retrenchment. CoreWeave, Inc. (ASX: CRWV) itself disclosed a contract backlog of US$104 billion, including "take-or-pay" contracts, which provides some support for future revenue but cannot completely eliminate financing and performance risks.

Rajadhyaksha believes there is insufficient basis to directly infer from CoreWeave, Inc. (ASX: CRWV) bond yields rising to 15% that AI infrastructure financing has already broken and the capital expenditure cycle is about to end. This week's market rebound has also not yet confirmed the most pessimistic judgment. However, the AI trade has become an important force driving market movements, and it is not surprising that investors remain highly sensitive to any signal that could shake this narrative.

Whether CoreWeave, Inc. (ASX: CRWV) becomes the Silicon Valley Bank of 2026 depends not on how high the yields on a batch of lower-priority bonds are, but on whether financing pressure further transmits to computing power prices, corporate cash flows and the entire industry's capital expenditure. Barclays believes the market may have overestimated the industry risk represented by this bond sell-off, but whether computing power demand and rental prices can be sustained remains the key to judging the direction of the AI investment cycle.

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment