Part 1 My view on this report

Part 1

My view on this report - It can be misleading with certain important points omitted. Further more the report is quite pessimistic.

The reports from bloombergs previously stated that the White House will not support a foreign entity controlling Intel factories , however it also did mention that a Joint Venture between a foreign entity and local US semiconductor entities can be possible. With the 2 companies TSMC and Broadcom in the picture, it fits the above stated which makes the deal possible. There are many variables on how the structure will be like, but I am certain that it will be positive to the value of the shareholders.

Tech Trader: Intel's Future Still Looks Murky. Don't Chase the Stock. -- Barron's

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

gogoooCn
02-25
gogoooCn
Thx for sharing. Very informative

Leave a comment

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"detailType":1,"isChannel":false,"data":{"magic":2,"id":406236349386992,"tweetId":"406236349386992","gmtCreate":1740206414099,"gmtModify":1740474666296,"author":{"id":3576111671550713,"idStr":"3576111671550713","authorId":3576111671550713,"authorIdStr":"3576111671550713","name":"Lio23","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b6135851ddbd7ec6027deecfbe758d41","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":39,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"html":"<html><head></head><body>Part 1\nMy view on this report - It can be misleading with certain important points omitted. Further more the report is quite pessimistic.\nThe reports from bloombergs previously stated that the White House will not support a foreign entity controlling Intel factories , however it also did mention that a Joint Venture between a foreign entity and local US semiconductor entities can be possible. With the 2 companies TSMC and Broadcom in the picture, it fits the above stated which makes the deal possible. There are many variables on how the structure will be like, but I am certain that it will be positive to the value of the shareholders.</body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body>Part 1\nMy view on this report - It can be misleading with certain important points omitted. Further more the report is quite pessimistic.\nThe reports from bloombergs previously stated that the White House will not support a foreign entity controlling Intel factories , however it also did mention that a Joint Venture between a foreign entity and local US semiconductor entities can be possible. With the 2 companies TSMC and Broadcom in the picture, it fits the above stated which makes the deal possible. There are many variables on how the structure will be like, but I am certain that it will be positive to the value of the shareholders.</body></html>","text":"Part 1 My view on this report - It can be misleading with certain important points omitted. Further more the report is quite pessimistic. The reports from bloombergs previously stated that the White House will not support a foreign entity controlling Intel factories , however it also did mention that a Joint Venture between a foreign entity and local US semiconductor entities can be possible. With the 2 companies TSMC and Broadcom in the picture, it fits the above stated which makes the deal possible. There are many variables on how the structure will be like, but I am certain that it will be positive to the value of the shareholders.","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":18,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":3,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/406236349386992","repostId":2513287240,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2513287240","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1740191400,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2513287240?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-02-22 10:30","market":"fut","language":"en","title":"Tech Trader: Intel's Future Still Looks Murky. Don't Chase the Stock. -- Barron's","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2513287240","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"This article is from the free weekly Barron's Tech email newsletter. Sign up here to get it delivered directly to your inbox.Intel shares have surged over the past week on the Trump administration's promise to support domestic chip manufacturing and reports that semiconductor companies are weighing options to purchase parts of Intel.Second, there isn't an easy way to separate Intel's chip manufacturing operations. In 2024, Intel Foundry generated $17.5 billion in revenue, down 7% versus the prior year, while losing $13.4 billion. Financially, it makes little sense for an external buyer to purchase a financial black hole with massive losses that isn't viable on a stand-alone basis. It also doesn't help sentiment about Intel's foundry road map when Michelle Johnston Holthaus, interim co-CEO of Intel and CEO of Intel Products, repeatedly reiterates sh","content":"\n\n By Tae Kim \n\n\n This article is from the free weekly Barron's Tech email newsletter. Sign up here to get it delivered directly to your inbox. \n\n\n Intel shares have surged over the past week on the Trump administration's promise to support domestic chip manufacturing and reports that semiconductor companies are weighing options to purchase parts of Intel. \n\n\n Upon closer examination of the developments, investors should be cautious. The likelihood of any transformative deals in the near term is low, and not much has changed regarding Intel's challenges. It may be wise for investors to not chase the stock. \n\n\n The rally started early last week after Vice President JD Vance vowed more chips would be made in the U.S. during his speech at an AI conference in France. Intel stock gained further steam on reports from Bloomberg and The Wall Street Journal that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing was considering taking a stake in Intel's chip factories, while Broadcom was looking at buying Intel's product business. All told, Intel stock rose by nearly 40% over five trading sessions through Tuesday. \n\n\n But the flurry of news reports at times contradicted each other, with one saying the Trump administration raised the idea of TSMC taking a controlling stake in Intel's chip factories, while another citing a White House official saying Trump would not likely support such a deal. \n\n\n The most important thing is the common thread of all the reporting included phrases like \"very early stages,\" \"informally discussed,\" and no formalized structure. It is clear the discussions aren't advanced. \n\n\n Intel and TSMC declined to comment on the reports. The White House and Broadcom didn't respond to a request for comment. \n\n\n Speculation about a major Intel deal is nothing new. Last fall, there were reports of Qualcomm approaching Intel about a takeover. Nothing has happened since. \n\n\n The fact is the prospects for a transformative Intel deal still face two primary challenges that will be difficult to overcome. \n\n\n First, any major transaction for a purchase of Intel's product group would need approval from global regulators. China blocked a much smaller $5 billion acquisition of Israel's Tower Semiconductor in 2023, suggesting the Asian country isn't keen on any acquisition that would help the U.S. chipmaking industry. It is unclear how China would then be amenable to Broadcom purchasing Intel's product business. \n\n\n Second, there isn't an easy way to separate Intel's chip manufacturing operations. In 2024, Intel Foundry generated $17.5 billion in revenue, down 7% versus the prior year, while losing $13.4 billion. Financially, it makes little sense for an external buyer to purchase a financial black hole with massive losses that isn't viable on a stand-alone basis. It also doesn't help sentiment about Intel's foundry road map when Michelle Johnston Holthaus, interim co-CEO of Intel and CEO of Intel Products, repeatedly reiterates she would potentially use TSMC for data center CPUs in the future if it \"made sense.\" \n\n\n All this comes as Intel still doesn't have a permanent CEO after Pat Gelsinger retired last December. Intel would be better served finding a competent leader with technical expertise to figure out a turnaround strategy and stabilize the business. The chip maker shouldn't discuss selling itself for parts while trying to find a quality CEO, especially when a deal may not even be possible. \n\n\n For investors, it may be prudent to take some gains. Waiting for something that may not happen could prove disappointing. \n\n\n This Week in Barron's Tech \n\n<pre>\n -- Apple Launches New, Cheaper iPhone. Price Starts at $599. \n \n -- Palantir Stock Is Off the Charts. Why It's Time to Sell. \n \n -- Meta Stock Sinks Further. Here's What Would Revive the Rally. \n \n -- Arista Stock Falls After Earnings. Why Meta Is Partly to Blame. \n \n -- Etsy Stock Falls on Revenue Miss \n</pre>\n\n Write to Tae Kim at tae.kim@barrons.com or follow him on X at @firstadopter. \n\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n\n To subscribe to Barron's, visit http://www.barrons.com/subscribe \n\n\n (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n\n\n February 21, 2025 21:30 ET (02:30 GMT)\n\n\n Copyright (c) 2025 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n\n","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Tech Trader: Intel's Future Still Looks Murky. Don't Chase the Stock. -- Barron's</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nTech Trader: Intel's Future Still Looks Murky. Don't Chase the Stock. -- Barron's\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\nDow Jones \n2025-02-22 10:30\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n\n\n By Tae Kim \n\n\n This article is from the free weekly Barron's Tech email newsletter. Sign up here to get it delivered directly to your inbox. \n\n\n Intel shares have surged over the past week on the Trump administration's promise to support domestic chip manufacturing and reports that semiconductor companies are weighing options to purchase parts of Intel. \n\n\n Upon closer examination of the developments, investors should be cautious. The likelihood of any transformative deals in the near term is low, and not much has changed regarding Intel's challenges. It may be wise for investors to not chase the stock. \n\n\n The rally started early last week after Vice President JD Vance vowed more chips would be made in the U.S. during his speech at an AI conference in France. Intel stock gained further steam on reports from Bloomberg and The Wall Street Journal that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing was considering taking a stake in Intel's chip factories, while Broadcom was looking at buying Intel's product business. All told, Intel stock rose by nearly 40% over five trading sessions through Tuesday. \n\n\n But the flurry of news reports at times contradicted each other, with one saying the Trump administration raised the idea of TSMC taking a controlling stake in Intel's chip factories, while another citing a White House official saying Trump would not likely support such a deal. \n\n\n The most important thing is the common thread of all the reporting included phrases like \"very early stages,\" \"informally discussed,\" and no formalized structure. It is clear the discussions aren't advanced. \n\n\n Intel and TSMC declined to comment on the reports. The White House and Broadcom didn't respond to a request for comment. \n\n\n Speculation about a major Intel deal is nothing new. Last fall, there were reports of Qualcomm approaching Intel about a takeover. Nothing has happened since. \n\n\n The fact is the prospects for a transformative Intel deal still face two primary challenges that will be difficult to overcome. \n\n\n First, any major transaction for a purchase of Intel's product group would need approval from global regulators. China blocked a much smaller $5 billion acquisition of Israel's Tower Semiconductor in 2023, suggesting the Asian country isn't keen on any acquisition that would help the U.S. chipmaking industry. It is unclear how China would then be amenable to Broadcom purchasing Intel's product business. \n\n\n Second, there isn't an easy way to separate Intel's chip manufacturing operations. In 2024, Intel Foundry generated $17.5 billion in revenue, down 7% versus the prior year, while losing $13.4 billion. Financially, it makes little sense for an external buyer to purchase a financial black hole with massive losses that isn't viable on a stand-alone basis. It also doesn't help sentiment about Intel's foundry road map when Michelle Johnston Holthaus, interim co-CEO of Intel and CEO of Intel Products, repeatedly reiterates she would potentially use TSMC for data center CPUs in the future if it \"made sense.\" \n\n\n All this comes as Intel still doesn't have a permanent CEO after Pat Gelsinger retired last December. Intel would be better served finding a competent leader with technical expertise to figure out a turnaround strategy and stabilize the business. The chip maker shouldn't discuss selling itself for parts while trying to find a quality CEO, especially when a deal may not even be possible. \n\n\n For investors, it may be prudent to take some gains. Waiting for something that may not happen could prove disappointing. \n\n\n This Week in Barron's Tech \n\n<pre>\n -- Apple Launches New, Cheaper iPhone. Price Starts at $599. \n \n -- Palantir Stock Is Off the Charts. Why It's Time to Sell. \n \n -- Meta Stock Sinks Further. Here's What Would Revive the Rally. \n \n -- Arista Stock Falls After Earnings. Why Meta Is Partly to Blame. \n \n -- Etsy Stock Falls on Revenue Miss \n</pre>\n\n Write to Tae Kim at tae.kim@barrons.com or follow him on X at @firstadopter. \n\n<pre>\n \n</pre>\n\n To subscribe to Barron's, visit http://www.barrons.com/subscribe \n\n\n (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n\n\n February 21, 2025 21:30 ET (02:30 GMT)\n\n\n Copyright (c) 2025 Dow Jones &amp; Company, Inc.\n\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"LU1868836591.USD":"CT (LUX) I AMERICAN \"1U\"(USD) ACC","LU2279689827.SGD":"JPMorgan Investment Funds - Global Income Sustainable A (mth) SGD-H","IE00BDGV0183.EUR":"GUINNESS GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"C\" (EUR) INC","LU1934455863.HKD":"AB SICAV I LOW VOLATILITY TOTAL RETURN EQUITY PORT \"A\" (HKD) ACC","LU2461242641.AUD":"WELLINGTON US QUALITY GROWTH \"A\" (AUDHDG) ACC","LU0823421333.USD":"BNP PARIBAS DISRUPTIVE TECHNOLOGY \"C\" (USD) ACC","LU1244550494.USD":"FRANKLIN GLOBAL MULTI-ASSET INCOME \"A\" (USDHEDGED) ACC","LU0823414551.USD":"BNP PARIBAS ENERGY TRANSITION \"C\" (USD) INC","IE00BK4W5M84.HKD":"HSBC GLOBAL FUNDS ICAV US EQUITY INDEX \"HC\" (HKD) ACC","LU0965509101.SGD":"AB LOW VOLATILITY EQUITY PORTFOLIO \"A\" (SGDHDG) ACC","LU2211815571.USD":"ALLIANZ POSITIVE CHANGE \"AT\" (USD) ACC","03145":"华夏亚洲高息股","LU0097036916.USD":"贝莱德美国增长A2 USD","IE00B1XK9C88.USD":"PINEBRIDGE US LARGE CAP RESEARCH ENHANCED \"A\" (USD) ACC","LU2322448957.HKD":"ALLIANZ GLOBAL INTELLIGENT CITIES INCOME \"AMG\" (HKD) INC","LU0321505868.SGD":"Schroder ISF Global Dividend Maximiser A Dis SGD","BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4535":"淡马锡持仓","LU0642271901.SGD":"Janus Henderson Horizon Global Technology Leaders A2 SGD-H","LU0661504455.SGD":"Blackrock Global Equity Income A5 SGD-H","LU1366192091.USD":"ALLIANZ US EQUITY PLUS \"AM\" (USD) INC","IE00BVYPNW00.USD":"GUINNESS GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"C\" (USD) ACC","INTC":"英特尔","SG9999001440.SGD":"United Global Dividend Equity Fund A SGD Dist","LU0444973449.USD":"CT (LUX) I GLOBAL TECHNOLOGY \"DU\" (USD) ACC","TSM":"台积电","LU0082616367.USD":"摩根大通美国科技A（dist）","LU1868838027.USD":"CT (LUX) I GLOBAL EMERGING MARKET EQUITIES \"8\" (USD) ACC","BK4579":"人工智能","LU1670710588.SGD":"M&G (LUX) GLOBAL DIVIDEND \"A\" (SGD) ACC","QCOM":"高通","SGXZ81514606.USD":"大华环球创新基金A Acc USD","LU0942090050.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY SICAV - US TOTAL YIELD SUSTAINABLE \"P\" (USD) INC","LU1814569148.SGD":"WELLINGTON GLOBAL QUALITY GROWTH \"D\" (SGDHDG) ACC","CCF":"Chase Corp","IE00BLSP4452.SGD":"Legg Mason ClearBridge - Tactical Dividend Income A Mdis SGD-H Plus","LU1720051017.SGD":"Allianz Global Artificial Intelligence AT Acc H2-SGD","AVGO":"博通","LU2249611893.SGD":"BNP PARIBAS ENERGY TRANSITION \"CRH\" (SGD) ACC","TSEM":"Tower半导体","LU1868837722.USD":"CT (LUX) I GLOBAL EMERGING MARKET EQUITIES \"2\" (USD) ACC","LU1989764748.USD":"东方汇理环球颠覆性机遇A2 Acc","IE00BGHQF631.EUR":"GUINNESS GLOBAL EQUITY INCOME \"C\" (EUR) ACC","LU2272731600.USD":"Allianz Global Intelligent Cities AM Dis USD","LU0353189763.USD":"ALLSPRING US ALL CAP GROWTH FUND \"I\" (USD) ACC","LU0081259029.USD":"UBS (LUX) EQUITY FUND - TECH OPPORTUNITY \"P\" (USD) ACC","LU1037948541.HKD":"AB LOW VOLATILITY EQUITY PORTFOLIO \"A\" (HKD) ACC","SG9999015952.SGD":"LIONGLOBAL DISRUPTIVE INNOVATION \"I\" (SGD) ACC","LU0912757837.SGD":"JPMorgan Investment Funds - Global Income A (mth) SGD-H","BK4512":"苹果概念"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2513287240","content_text":"By Tae Kim \n\n\n This article is from the free weekly Barron's Tech email newsletter. Sign up here to get it delivered directly to your inbox. \n\n\n Intel shares have surged over the past week on the Trump administration's promise to support domestic chip manufacturing and reports that semiconductor companies are weighing options to purchase parts of Intel. \n\n\n Upon closer examination of the developments, investors should be cautious. The likelihood of any transformative deals in the near term is low, and not much has changed regarding Intel's challenges. It may be wise for investors to not chase the stock. \n\n\n The rally started early last week after Vice President JD Vance vowed more chips would be made in the U.S. during his speech at an AI conference in France. Intel stock gained further steam on reports from Bloomberg and The Wall Street Journal that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing was considering taking a stake in Intel's chip factories, while Broadcom was looking at buying Intel's product business. All told, Intel stock rose by nearly 40% over five trading sessions through Tuesday. \n\n\n But the flurry of news reports at times contradicted each other, with one saying the Trump administration raised the idea of TSMC taking a controlling stake in Intel's chip factories, while another citing a White House official saying Trump would not likely support such a deal. \n\n\n The most important thing is the common thread of all the reporting included phrases like \"very early stages,\" \"informally discussed,\" and no formalized structure. It is clear the discussions aren't advanced. \n\n\n Intel and TSMC declined to comment on the reports. The White House and Broadcom didn't respond to a request for comment. \n\n\n Speculation about a major Intel deal is nothing new. Last fall, there were reports of Qualcomm approaching Intel about a takeover. Nothing has happened since. \n\n\n The fact is the prospects for a transformative Intel deal still face two primary challenges that will be difficult to overcome. \n\n\n First, any major transaction for a purchase of Intel's product group would need approval from global regulators. China blocked a much smaller $5 billion acquisition of Israel's Tower Semiconductor in 2023, suggesting the Asian country isn't keen on any acquisition that would help the U.S. chipmaking industry. It is unclear how China would then be amenable to Broadcom purchasing Intel's product business. \n\n\n Second, there isn't an easy way to separate Intel's chip manufacturing operations. In 2024, Intel Foundry generated $17.5 billion in revenue, down 7% versus the prior year, while losing $13.4 billion. Financially, it makes little sense for an external buyer to purchase a financial black hole with massive losses that isn't viable on a stand-alone basis. It also doesn't help sentiment about Intel's foundry road map when Michelle Johnston Holthaus, interim co-CEO of Intel and CEO of Intel Products, repeatedly reiterates she would potentially use TSMC for data center CPUs in the future if it \"made sense.\" \n\n\n All this comes as Intel still doesn't have a permanent CEO after Pat Gelsinger retired last December. Intel would be better served finding a competent leader with technical expertise to figure out a turnaround strategy and stabilize the business. The chip maker shouldn't discuss selling itself for parts while trying to find a quality CEO, especially when a deal may not even be possible. \n\n\n For investors, it may be prudent to take some gains. Waiting for something that may not happen could prove disappointing. \n\n\n This Week in Barron's Tech \n\n\n -- Apple Launches New, Cheaper iPhone. Price Starts at $599. \n \n -- Palantir Stock Is Off the Charts. Why It's Time to Sell. \n \n -- Meta Stock Sinks Further. Here's What Would Revive the Rally. \n \n -- Arista Stock Falls After Earnings. Why Meta Is Partly to Blame. \n \n -- Etsy Stock Falls on Revenue Miss \n\n\n Write to Tae Kim at tae.kim@barrons.com or follow him on X at @firstadopter. \n\n\n \n\n\n To subscribe to Barron's, visit http://www.barrons.com/subscribe \n\n\n (END) Dow Jones Newswires\n\n\n February 21, 2025 21:30 ET (02:30 GMT)\n\n\n Copyright (c) 2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"INTC":1,"QCOM":0.9,"TSEM":0.9,"03145":0.6,"AVGO":0.9,"TSM":0.9,"CCF":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1368,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":["TSM","INTC"],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":true,"length":532,"optionInvolvedFlag":false,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[{"id":407329132527736,"commentId":"407329132527736","gmtCreate":1740474659412,"gmtModify":1740474664769,"authorId":10000000000010976,"author":{"id":10000000000010976,"idStr":"10000000000010975","authorId":10000000000010976,"name":"gogoooCn","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b17af8d14081700b793911bb75de6b67","vip":8,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[]},"repliedAuthorId":0,"objectId":406236349386992,"objectIdStr":"406236349386992","type":1,"supId":0,"supIdStr":"0","prevId":0,"prevIdStr":"0","content":"Thx for sharing. Very informative","text":"Thx for sharing. Very informative","html":"Thx for sharing. Very informative","likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"subComments":[],"verified":10,"allocateAmount":0,"commentType":"valid","coins":0,"score":0,"disclaimerType":0}],"isCommentEnd":false,"isTiger":false,"isWeiXinMini":false,"url":"/m/post/406236349386992"}