🚀 Intel Up 100% YTD — But Is This Just the Beginning of a Multi-Year Comeback? Or the Peak Before Reality Hits?
Intel $Intel(INTC)$ has become one of 2025’s biggest comeback stories — a stock many had written off as a dinosaur, now roaring back over 100% year-to-date and jumping another 8% on reports it may supply chips to Apple.
But beneath the surface hype, something far more important is happening:
👉 Intel is fighting for its life — and may actually be winning.
👉 But the risks are bigger than most investors realise.
Let’s break down what’s really driving this rally — and whether it still has room to run.
---
🔧 1️⃣ The Return of Intel’s Engineering Mojo — Finally More Than Talk?
For nearly a decade, Intel lagged badly behind TSMC. Now the company is attempting one of the most aggressive comebacks the semiconductor world has ever seen:
“5 nodes in 4 years” — a roadmap Wall Street didn’t believe.
But so far:
✔ Intel 20A is progressing,
✔ Intel 18A is attracting early customers,
✔ Packaging tech (Foveros) is winning attention in AI workloads,
✔ And internal yields — formerly a disaster — are trending up.
This is the most important shift that investors are underestimating:
➡ If Intel truly closes the manufacturing gap, its entire valuation resets.
Not gradually — violently.
But let’s be honest:
⚠ A single slip could break trust again.
Intel’s credibility is still on probation.
---
🏭 2️⃣ The Foundry Gamble: From “Hopeless” to “National Champion”
Intel Foundry Services (IFS) might be the real prize here.
Not because the business is mature — it isn’t — but because the world suddenly needs what Intel offers:
✔ U.S. domestic chip manufacturing
✔ Reducing dependence on Taiwan
✔ Secure production for AI, defense, aerospace
✔ CHIPS Act money raining from the sky
Intel has gone from
“old PC company” → “geopolitical necessity.”
This is why IFS is now treated as a strategic asset, not a commercial one.
But here’s the truth retail often misses:
⚠ IFS still loses money.
⚠ Scaling a foundry is brutally hard.
⚠ Without mega-customers (Apple, Qualcomm, AWS), profitability is far away.
Which is exactly why the Apple-supply rumour shook the market — even a partial Apple order would flip Intel’s image from “potential” to “validated.”
---
🤖 3️⃣ AI, HPC & the New Intel Narrative
Intel is quietly carving out a lane in AI infrastructure:
• Gaudi accelerators (far cheaper than Nvidia chips)
• Strong positioning in enterprise AI
• Partnerships in cloud + edge inference
• Packaging tech that enables chiplets for AI systems
No — Intel won’t beat Nvidia.
That’s not the story.
The story is this:
➡ AI demand is so massive that “second place” is still a trillion-dollar lane.
If Intel captures even 5–10% of the AI accelerator market, the stock is still mispriced today.
---
📈 4️⃣ The Valuation Question: Too Much, Too Fast? Or Still Cheap?
Intel trading at $40 after a 100% YTD move sounds expensive.
But historically?
Intel traded at $60–$70 when it was shrinking.
Now it’s transforming and trading at… $40.
Strange? Yes.
Telling? Absolutely.
But let’s avoid hopium:
🚨 What’s already priced in?
A U.S. manufacturing comeback
AI-driven upside
Foundry expansion
Stabilizing PC demand
A multi-year margin recovery
🚨 What’s NOT priced in?
A megadeal with Apple
IFS profitability
Intel surpassing Samsung or catching TSMC
Becoming the “Western AI chip hub”
In other words:
➡ This rally isn’t just sentiment. It’s the market repricing Intel’s strategic importance.
---
🎯 So… Add, Trim, or Hold?
If you’re long-term and believe Intel’s recovery is real:
This is not the top — it’s the first inning.
If you only rode the momentum and don’t trust Intel’s execution:
Protecting gains on a 100% run isn’t wrong.
But the deeper analysis suggests something bigger:
Intel is not just a turnaround play anymore —
it’s becoming a geopolitical monopoly in the making.
And markets reward strategic monopolies.
Aggressively.
---
❓ Your Move
Do you see Intel as:
🟢 A multi-year national-champion growth story?
🔴 A hype-driven rebound that will fail at the next stumble?
⚪ Or a trading play, not an investment?
Comments