⚡️ price target 60$

Capacity factor (how often a power source actually produces energy):

• Nuclear: ~91%

• Solar: ~24%

• Wind: ~34%

Same grid, completely different reliability.

While solar and wind are critical pieces of the future, they are intermittent. Nuclear, on the other hand, runs almost nonstop. And that matters now more than ever.

We’re entering an era driven by:

• AI

• Data centers

• Electrification

All three demand constant, scalable, baseload power. That’s where nuclear steps in.

—

📊 The market signal:

NuScale ($SMR) raised $1.225B, with institutional money flowing in between $19–$36.

So either:

1. The market is correctly repricing short-term risk, or

2. Major institutions (Goldman, Vanguard, BlackRock, etc.) mispriced the opportunity at scale

Only one of these is likely.

—

🚀 The bigger picture:

Nuclear is:

• Reliable

• Carbon-free

• Scalable (especially SMRs)

And it’s increasingly being positioned as the backbone of next-gen energy infrastructure.

Tickers gaining traction:

$SMR $OKLO $NNE $LEU $LTBR

—

Bottom line:

Energy policy doesn’t get to choose between “clean” vs “reliable.”

The future demands both.

And right now, nuclear is one of the few technologies that can deliver 24/7 clean power at scale.

$SMR is a direct bet on that reality.: