Member Portfolio Audit | Principal (Age 60+) | EP1631šŸ¦–

The Investing Iguana
05-29 17:33

Member Portfolio Audit | Principal (Age 60+) | EP1631šŸ¦–

Everyone talks about ā€œover‑concentrationā€ like it is a tech‑stock problem, but the most concentrated portfolios I see now are in DBS, OCBC and one or two ā€œsafeā€ property names. On paper, this looks conservative: two big banks, a few REITs, maybe an old family counter that has been in the drawer for 15 years. When I line up yield, gearing and fair value, what I actually see is one clean engine quietly subsidising several assets that no longer earn their keep.

If you are in your fifties or sixties, planning to live off dividends, this gap matters more than the headline STI level or what your broker calls ā€œblue chipsā€. A bank stack paying above 5 percent can feel comforting until you notice that 10 to 15 percent of your net worth is stuck in names that fail even a 3.2 percent forensic floor once you adjust for debt and valuation drag. The question I ask in this episode is simple: if your DBS and OCBC payouts stopped tomorrow, which positions in your portfolio would you still defend with conviction?

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment
1