98io
07-16

The key question isn't whether memory demand is collapsing, but whether this selloff reflects fundamentals or simply a valuation reset triggered by tighter liquidity and leverage unwinding.

HBM demand from AI accelerators remains exceptionally strong, and supply is still constrained. On that front, SK Hynix arguably has the stronger near-term positioning given its lead in HBM and close relationship with NVIDIA. However, that advantage is also why Hynix traded at a much richer valuation and became more vulnerable to profit taking.

Samsung is the more diversified bet. If it successfully closes the HBM technology gap and wins larger AI memory share, today's correction could look like an attractive entry point for long-term investors.

My view: this feels more like a policy-driven shakeout than the end of the AI memory cycle. The bigger risk isn't demand disappearing, but AI capex slowing faster than expected in 2027–2028.

If forced to choose: Hynix for higher growth, Samsung for better risk-adjusted returns.

Curious what others think — is this a buying opportunity or the first crack in the AI memory supercycle?

Shareholder Return Pledges Spark Memory-Chain Rebound Thursday — Chase It?
Memory rebounded Thursday after two days down: SK Hynix +4.43%, Micron +3.97%, SanDisk +2.02%, with the 2x inverse SNDQ −4.46%. The driver was payouts, not demand: SK Hynix's 40tn won buyback is confirmed; Samsung reportedly plans over 100tn won with 50% of free cash flow pledged — the first explicit promise to distribute AI cash flow. The bear case sharpened: Wood is avoiding memory, and the cost is landing downstream — Xiaomi's profit dented, Intel GPU prices +48%. Hynix and Samsung for the dividend, Micron and SanDisk for torque, or wait for downstream acceptance?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment
7