苏36
10-05
I’d pick SpaceX, TSMC and NVIDIA.

What fascinates me isn’t simply Harvard putting more than 50% into SpaceX—it’s the infrastructure thesis behind the portfolio. SpaceX represents next-generation connectivity and space infrastructure, while TSMC and NVIDIA sit at the core of the AI compute supply chain.

However, I wouldn’t blindly copy that concentration. Harvard’s endowment has a very different risk tolerance, time horizon and access to private investments than an individual investor.

The 4% gold position is equally interesting. Even while aggressively backing technology, Harvard still keeps a hedge against inflation, rates and geopolitical shocks.

My takeaway: don’t copy Harvard’s percentages—copy the logic behind the bets. Conviction matters, but position sizing determines whether you can survive being wrong.

@Tiger_SG [贱笑]

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Comments

We need your insight to fill this gap
Leave a comment