Lie Flat personal page - To The Moon

Lie Flat

Lie Flat

No personal profile

4Follow

0Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2025-10-16

China stock are sprinter not marathon. Short burst then fall off

Singapore Wealth Fund Accuses EV Maker NIO of Inflating Revenue, Bloomberg Reports

2025-05-23

No problem. Just a storm not tsunami

YZJ Shipbldg SGD Plummets 4.67% as Q1 Order Intake Disappoints Investors

2025-05-18

Does this include capital gain from US stocks?

USA Proposes 5% Tax on Remittances by Non-Citizens – What It Could Mean for Indians

2025-02-26

$FIDELITY GREATER CHINA "A" (SGD) INC(LU0370786039.SGD)$ why does this fund drop over 2% in it's weekly performance when China stocks are on a bull 🐂 ?

2025-02-24

Mainly will benefit the big 3 banks . Family office will not want their money in non blue chip .

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2025-02-22

$LIONGLOBAL SINGAPORE DIVIDEND EQUITY (SGDHDG) INC(SGXZ58947870.SGD)$ STI index is up for past one week . Why the fund price drop so much today ? Make me wonder how is the NAV calculated .

2025-02-14

$ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH "AMI" (SGDHDG) INC(LU2756315664.SGD)$ what does "AMI "or "AM" mean ?

2025-01-27

$Nikko AM STI ETF(G3B.SI)$ where can I view the historical dividend yield ? Not the payout

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4200117619876312","uuid":"4200117619876312","gmtCreate":1737014449163,"gmtModify":1748005543595,"name":"Lie Flat","pinyin":"lieflatlieflat","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3e249c158007385e6a5ba35c389c3a48","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":4,"tweetSize":8,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":1,"level":{"id":0,"name":"","nameTw":"","represent":"","factor":"","iconColor":"","bgColor":""},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":1,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"init","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.04.02","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":1,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":3,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"post","tweets":[{"id":489764484526360,"gmtCreate":1760594684236,"gmtModify":1760594687963,"author":{"id":"4200117619876312","authorId":"4200117619876312","name":"Lie Flat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3e249c158007385e6a5ba35c389c3a48","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4200117619876312","authorIdStr":"4200117619876312"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"China stock are sprinter not marathon. Short burst then fall off","listText":"China stock are sprinter not marathon. Short burst then fall off","text":"China stock are sprinter not marathon. Short burst then fall off","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/489764484526360","repostId":"1188864944","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1188864944","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1760593780,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1188864944?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-10-16 13:49","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Singapore Wealth Fund Accuses EV Maker NIO of Inflating Revenue, Bloomberg Reports","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1188864944","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund has sued Nio in a US court, accusing the Chinese electric vehicle maker and executives of violating securities laws by inflating revenues, Bloomberg reported.The...","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund has sued NIO in a US court, accusing the Chinese electric vehicle maker and executives of violating securities laws by inflating revenues, Bloomberg reported.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The lawsuit, filed in August in the Southern District of New York, named the company, Chief Executive Officer Li Bin and former Chief Financial Officer Feng Wei as defendants. NIO shares dropped as much as 9.7% in Hong Kong and 9.8% in Singapore on Thursday, and its US-listed shares sank 7.1% in overnight trading.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/75cf0e9eb4ef6705dc909ba1b2084aa4\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"392\" tg-height=\"200\"/></p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">GIC alleged the defendants made “materially false and/or misleading statements” about NIO’s ties to an affiliated company called NIO Battery Asset Co. — or Weineng in Chinese — and failed to disclose key facts about its business and finances.</p><p>According to the complaint, those misstatements artificially inflated the value of NIO’s securities, causing GIC to suffer “significant losses.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">NIO operates a battery subscription model in which car buyers don’t have to purchase batteries outright. Instead, they can pay a recurring fee to access the company’s network of battery-swap stations.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">GIC’s suit contended that Weineng’s financial records show it bought batteries upfront from NIO, allowing NIO to immediately record the full revenue from those sales — even though the end users hadn’t yet paid for the batteries. The filing argued that such income should have been recognized gradually, not all at once.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">NIO didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. GIC declined to comment to Bloomberg.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The case has been stayed by a judge as it’s similar to a previous suit filed in 2022 against NIO, according to an Oct. 3 filing.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">NIO, founded in 2014, was once seen as rising star in the EV industry that could eventually rival Tesla Inc. It’s known for its battery swap technology, which allows owners to switch out a depleted battery for a new one in minutes. Buyers have the option to purchase a NIO EV without the battery and instead opt for a subscription.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">But this business model is capital intensive and has required building out expensive swapping stations, and the company has faced severe liquidity crises.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">A 2022 report from New York-based Grizzly Research detailed these accounting practices. NIO said in response that it would launch an independent committee to investigate the claims, according to the court filings.</p><p>That led NIO’s American depositary notes to plunge, resulting in substantial losses, GIC’s filing said. The fund is seeking compensation for all losses relating to NIO’s wrongdoing and reasonable reimbursement of its legal costs, according to the documents.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Singapore Wealth Fund Accuses EV Maker NIO of Inflating Revenue, Bloomberg Reports</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSingapore Wealth Fund Accuses EV Maker NIO of Inflating Revenue, Bloomberg Reports\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-10-16 13:49</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund has sued NIO in a US court, accusing the Chinese electric vehicle maker and executives of violating securities laws by inflating revenues, Bloomberg reported.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The lawsuit, filed in August in the Southern District of New York, named the company, Chief Executive Officer Li Bin and former Chief Financial Officer Feng Wei as defendants. NIO shares dropped as much as 9.7% in Hong Kong and 9.8% in Singapore on Thursday, and its US-listed shares sank 7.1% in overnight trading.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/75cf0e9eb4ef6705dc909ba1b2084aa4\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"392\" tg-height=\"200\"/></p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">GIC alleged the defendants made “materially false and/or misleading statements” about NIO’s ties to an affiliated company called NIO Battery Asset Co. — or Weineng in Chinese — and failed to disclose key facts about its business and finances.</p><p>According to the complaint, those misstatements artificially inflated the value of NIO’s securities, causing GIC to suffer “significant losses.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">NIO operates a battery subscription model in which car buyers don’t have to purchase batteries outright. Instead, they can pay a recurring fee to access the company’s network of battery-swap stations.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">GIC’s suit contended that Weineng’s financial records show it bought batteries upfront from NIO, allowing NIO to immediately record the full revenue from those sales — even though the end users hadn’t yet paid for the batteries. The filing argued that such income should have been recognized gradually, not all at once.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">NIO didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. GIC declined to comment to Bloomberg.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The case has been stayed by a judge as it’s similar to a previous suit filed in 2022 against NIO, according to an Oct. 3 filing.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">NIO, founded in 2014, was once seen as rising star in the EV industry that could eventually rival Tesla Inc. It’s known for its battery swap technology, which allows owners to switch out a depleted battery for a new one in minutes. Buyers have the option to purchase a NIO EV without the battery and instead opt for a subscription.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">But this business model is capital intensive and has required building out expensive swapping stations, and the company has faced severe liquidity crises.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">A 2022 report from New York-based Grizzly Research detailed these accounting practices. NIO said in response that it would launch an independent committee to investigate the claims, according to the court filings.</p><p>That led NIO’s American depositary notes to plunge, resulting in substantial losses, GIC’s filing said. The fund is seeking compensation for all losses relating to NIO’s wrongdoing and reasonable reimbursement of its legal costs, according to the documents.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09866":"蔚来-SW","NIO.SI":"蔚来","NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1188864944","content_text":"Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund has sued NIO in a US court, accusing the Chinese electric vehicle maker and executives of violating securities laws by inflating revenues, Bloomberg reported.The lawsuit, filed in August in the Southern District of New York, named the company, Chief Executive Officer Li Bin and former Chief Financial Officer Feng Wei as defendants. NIO shares dropped as much as 9.7% in Hong Kong and 9.8% in Singapore on Thursday, and its US-listed shares sank 7.1% in overnight trading.GIC alleged the defendants made “materially false and/or misleading statements” about NIO’s ties to an affiliated company called NIO Battery Asset Co. — or Weineng in Chinese — and failed to disclose key facts about its business and finances.According to the complaint, those misstatements artificially inflated the value of NIO’s securities, causing GIC to suffer “significant losses.”NIO operates a battery subscription model in which car buyers don’t have to purchase batteries outright. Instead, they can pay a recurring fee to access the company’s network of battery-swap stations.GIC’s suit contended that Weineng’s financial records show it bought batteries upfront from NIO, allowing NIO to immediately record the full revenue from those sales — even though the end users hadn’t yet paid for the batteries. The filing argued that such income should have been recognized gradually, not all at once.NIO didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. GIC declined to comment to Bloomberg.The case has been stayed by a judge as it’s similar to a previous suit filed in 2022 against NIO, according to an Oct. 3 filing.NIO, founded in 2014, was once seen as rising star in the EV industry that could eventually rival Tesla Inc. It’s known for its battery swap technology, which allows owners to switch out a depleted battery for a new one in minutes. Buyers have the option to purchase a NIO EV without the battery and instead opt for a subscription.But this business model is capital intensive and has required building out expensive swapping stations, and the company has faced severe liquidity crises.A 2022 report from New York-based Grizzly Research detailed these accounting practices. NIO said in response that it would launch an independent committee to investigate the claims, according to the court filings.That led NIO’s American depositary notes to plunge, resulting in substantial losses, GIC’s filing said. The fund is seeking compensation for all losses relating to NIO’s wrongdoing and reasonable reimbursement of its legal costs, according to the documents.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NIO":1.1,"NIO.SI":1.1,"09866":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1381,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":438067292438736,"gmtCreate":1747984248998,"gmtModify":1747984252892,"author":{"id":"4200117619876312","authorId":"4200117619876312","name":"Lie Flat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3e249c158007385e6a5ba35c389c3a48","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4200117619876312","authorIdStr":"4200117619876312"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"No problem. Just a storm not tsunami&nbsp;","listText":"No problem. Just a storm not tsunami&nbsp;","text":"No problem. Just a storm not tsunami","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/438067292438736","repostId":"1109013097","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1109013097","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Track stock‘s movements and relevant news","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Stock Track","id":"1086803395","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a81accab1e7ee4144dc051f71903a390"},"pubTimestamp":1747967303,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1109013097?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-05-23 10:28","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"YZJ Shipbldg SGD Plummets 4.67% as Q1 Order Intake Disappoints Investors","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1109013097","media":"Stock Track","summary":"Shares of YZJ Shipbldg SGD  plunged 3.27% in Friday's trading session, as investors reacted to the company's disappointing first-quarter order intake report. The Chinese shipbuilder secured only six vessel orders worth US$300 million in Q1 2025, accounting for a mere 5% of its US$6 billion annual target.The weak performance stands in stark contrast to the same period last year when Yangzijiang won orders for 38 vessels valued at US$3.3 billion, representing 74% of its target. Executive Chairman ","content":"<p>Shares of YZJ Shipbldg SGD (BS6.SI) plunged 3.27% in Friday's trading session, as investors reacted to the company's disappointing first-quarter order intake report. The Chinese shipbuilder secured only six vessel orders worth US$300 million in Q1 2025, accounting for a mere 5% of its US$6 billion annual target.</p><p>The weak performance stands in stark contrast to the same period last year when Yangzijiang won orders for 38 vessels valued at US$3.3 billion, representing 74% of its target. Executive Chairman and CEO Ren Letian attributed the slowdown to U.S. policies and global trade tariffs, which have led customers to adopt a cautious stance, delaying new vessel commitments.</p><p>Despite the setback in new orders, Yangzijiang reported steady progress in vessel deliveries, with no delays or cancellations to date. The company has delivered 21 ships, or 38% of its 56-vessel target for the fiscal year, and maintains a strong order backlog of 230 vessels worth US$23.2 billion. This backlog ensures revenue visibility through 2028, potentially offering some consolation to worried investors. However, the market's immediate reaction suggests concerns over the company's ability to meet its ambitious annual targets in the face of challenging global trade conditions.</p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BS6.SI\">YZJ Shipbldg SGD</a> tumbles 4.67% at 10:59 am, May 23rd.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/aee5ed56fa93530c710e81d356def5da\" tg-width=\"891\" tg-height=\"637\"></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>YZJ Shipbldg SGD Plummets 4.67% as Q1 Order Intake Disappoints Investors</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nYZJ Shipbldg SGD Plummets 4.67% as Q1 Order Intake Disappoints Investors\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1086803395\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/a81accab1e7ee4144dc051f71903a390);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Stock Track </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-05-23 10:28</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Shares of YZJ Shipbldg SGD (BS6.SI) plunged 3.27% in Friday's trading session, as investors reacted to the company's disappointing first-quarter order intake report. The Chinese shipbuilder secured only six vessel orders worth US$300 million in Q1 2025, accounting for a mere 5% of its US$6 billion annual target.</p><p>The weak performance stands in stark contrast to the same period last year when Yangzijiang won orders for 38 vessels valued at US$3.3 billion, representing 74% of its target. Executive Chairman and CEO Ren Letian attributed the slowdown to U.S. policies and global trade tariffs, which have led customers to adopt a cautious stance, delaying new vessel commitments.</p><p>Despite the setback in new orders, Yangzijiang reported steady progress in vessel deliveries, with no delays or cancellations to date. The company has delivered 21 ships, or 38% of its 56-vessel target for the fiscal year, and maintains a strong order backlog of 230 vessels worth US$23.2 billion. This backlog ensures revenue visibility through 2028, potentially offering some consolation to worried investors. However, the market's immediate reaction suggests concerns over the company's ability to meet its ambitious annual targets in the face of challenging global trade conditions.</p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BS6.SI\">YZJ Shipbldg SGD</a> tumbles 4.67% at 10:59 am, May 23rd.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/aee5ed56fa93530c710e81d356def5da\" tg-width=\"891\" tg-height=\"637\"></p><p></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BS6.SI":"扬子江船业"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1109013097","content_text":"Shares of YZJ Shipbldg SGD (BS6.SI) plunged 3.27% in Friday's trading session, as investors reacted to the company's disappointing first-quarter order intake report. The Chinese shipbuilder secured only six vessel orders worth US$300 million in Q1 2025, accounting for a mere 5% of its US$6 billion annual target.The weak performance stands in stark contrast to the same period last year when Yangzijiang won orders for 38 vessels valued at US$3.3 billion, representing 74% of its target. Executive Chairman and CEO Ren Letian attributed the slowdown to U.S. policies and global trade tariffs, which have led customers to adopt a cautious stance, delaying new vessel commitments.Despite the setback in new orders, Yangzijiang reported steady progress in vessel deliveries, with no delays or cancellations to date. The company has delivered 21 ships, or 38% of its 56-vessel target for the fiscal year, and maintains a strong order backlog of 230 vessels worth US$23.2 billion. This backlog ensures revenue visibility through 2028, potentially offering some consolation to worried investors. However, the market's immediate reaction suggests concerns over the company's ability to meet its ambitious annual targets in the face of challenging global trade conditions. YZJ Shipbldg SGD tumbles 4.67% at 10:59 am, May 23rd.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BS6.SI":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2041,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":436074849095880,"gmtCreate":1747499861882,"gmtModify":1747499865817,"author":{"id":"4200117619876312","authorId":"4200117619876312","name":"Lie Flat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3e249c158007385e6a5ba35c389c3a48","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4200117619876312","authorIdStr":"4200117619876312"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Does this include capital gain from US stocks?&nbsp;","listText":"Does this include capital gain from US stocks?&nbsp;","text":"Does this include capital gain from US stocks?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/436074849095880","repostId":"1199930645","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199930645","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1747474971,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199930645?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-05-17 17:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"USA Proposes 5% Tax on Remittances by Non-Citizens – What It Could Mean for Indians","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199930645","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"For many Indian families, it’s been a point of pride – and often livelihood – that their children send money back from the United States. But these families may be in for a bit of a shock – when they ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>For many Indian families, it’s been a point of pride – and often livelihood – that their children send money back from the United States. But these families may be in for a bit of a shock – when they see less money in their accounts. That’s because a new tax has been proposed in the US – one that is aimed at these remittances specifically.</p><p>A U.S. bill proposes a 5% excise tax on any remittances that originate in the US to any other country. Indians are among the top three immigrant communities in the US with nearly 2.3 million Indians working there under various visa programmes. And these Indians account for one of the largest sources of remittances into India. In 2023 alone, they sent home over $23 billion.</p><p>But it’s not just H-1B, F-1 visa holders and green card holders who will be affected by the new Bill, if it is passed. For non-resident Indians in the US, the proposed tax will apply to any income they earn in the US from investments or stock options as well.</p><p>So take for instance a typical Indian family in the U.S. which sends home $1,000 a month. With the 5% tax, they will be able to send 50 dollars less. Inversely, they will have to send back a lot more money to offset the tax and ensure their monthly remittances to their families here don’t dip.</p><p>The Bill, which has been backed by Republicans, is linked to Trump’s broader economic agenda – and it has sparked off debate in Washington D.C.</p><p>Detractors, especially back here in India, warn that it could push remittances into informal or unregulated channels and make the U.S. less attractive to skilled workers from abroad. Some also argue that this could put pressure on employers to hike salaries just to offset the tax. There is also an argument that the tax unfairly targets legal immigrants, and could damage U.S. ties with countries like India.</p><p>“This levy clearly discriminates against non-US citizens who are contributing to the US economy in the same way as US citizens do. It is interesting to note that it is proposed to be levied by the same country that found India’s Equalisation Levy to be discriminatory!&#34; says Akhilesh Ranjan, former Member CBDT, now with PwC.</p><p>Similarly, Sandeep Jhunjhunwala, M&amp;A Tax Partner at Nangia Andersen LLP says, “A new remittance tax proposal by the House Republicans could significantly impact NRIs and other foreign nationals living in the United States. This represents a notable shift in US tax policy, particularly for foreign workers. By exempting only US citizens and nationals making remittance through qualified remittance transfer provider, the proposal disproportionately affects millions of lawful immigrants including green card holders, work visa holders, and non-resident aliens, many of whom maintain ongoing financial obligations in their home countries.”</p><p>“In addition to personal remittances, the provision could also affect compensation practices. Many foreign nationals receive RSUs as part of their pay packages. When these RSUs vest and are sold, the sales proceeds are often transferred overseas to home country, for personal use, family support, or investment. Under the proposed remittance tax, such transfers even of post-tax proceeds could attract the 5% excise levy, adding a layer of cost to already-taxed income,&#34; Jhunjhunwala added.</p><p>Ajay Rotti, founder of Tax Compass, a tax consultancy firm too believes that the tax has much larger implications. “A new legislative proposal in the United States, officially titled &#34;The One Big Beautiful Bill,&#34; seeks to impose a 5% excise tax on all international remittances sent by non-citizens. This includes individuals on non-immigrant visas such as H-1B and those holding green cards.&#34;</p><p>&#34;The bill aims to generate revenue from outbound remittances by non-citizens and levies a 5% remittance tax on outward remittance from US. The proposed 5% excise tax on international remittances by non-U.S. citizens is detailed in Section 112105 of the proposed Bill. This section outlines the specifics of the tax, including its applicability to non-citizens sending money abroad. The provision requires that the tax be collected by the remittance transfer providers and the remittance transfer providers are responsible for remitting such tax quarterly to the Secretary of the Treasury,” Rotti added.</p><p>Amarpal Chadha, Tax Partner and Mobility Leader, EY India, says, “The newly introduced U.S. bill proposes a 5% tax on remittances outside US and is currently at an early stage of consideration. The measure—if enacted—could place added financial pressure on Indian nationals working in the United States. Many may be forced to re-evaluate their remittance patterns, including the amount and frequency of remittances for the purpose of maintenance of family or investment in India.”</p><p>A senior Indian government official who did not wish to be named said, &#34;if this law is enacted it would amount to tax treaty override. We know that US constitution allows treaty override,  unlike India where more favourable law prevails, but this would be a very unwelcome treaty override from various countries point of views.&#34;</p><p>For now, this tax is just a proposal—but it’s already set alarm bells ringing across quite a few immigrant communities.</p><p></p><p><br/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>USA Proposes 5% Tax on Remittances by Non-Citizens – What It Could Mean for Indians</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUSA Proposes 5% Tax on Remittances by Non-Citizens – What It Could Mean for Indians\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-05-17 17:42</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>For many Indian families, it’s been a point of pride – and often livelihood – that their children send money back from the United States. But these families may be in for a bit of a shock – when they see less money in their accounts. That’s because a new tax has been proposed in the US – one that is aimed at these remittances specifically.</p><p>A U.S. bill proposes a 5% excise tax on any remittances that originate in the US to any other country. Indians are among the top three immigrant communities in the US with nearly 2.3 million Indians working there under various visa programmes. And these Indians account for one of the largest sources of remittances into India. In 2023 alone, they sent home over $23 billion.</p><p>But it’s not just H-1B, F-1 visa holders and green card holders who will be affected by the new Bill, if it is passed. For non-resident Indians in the US, the proposed tax will apply to any income they earn in the US from investments or stock options as well.</p><p>So take for instance a typical Indian family in the U.S. which sends home $1,000 a month. With the 5% tax, they will be able to send 50 dollars less. Inversely, they will have to send back a lot more money to offset the tax and ensure their monthly remittances to their families here don’t dip.</p><p>The Bill, which has been backed by Republicans, is linked to Trump’s broader economic agenda – and it has sparked off debate in Washington D.C.</p><p>Detractors, especially back here in India, warn that it could push remittances into informal or unregulated channels and make the U.S. less attractive to skilled workers from abroad. Some also argue that this could put pressure on employers to hike salaries just to offset the tax. There is also an argument that the tax unfairly targets legal immigrants, and could damage U.S. ties with countries like India.</p><p>“This levy clearly discriminates against non-US citizens who are contributing to the US economy in the same way as US citizens do. It is interesting to note that it is proposed to be levied by the same country that found India’s Equalisation Levy to be discriminatory!&#34; says Akhilesh Ranjan, former Member CBDT, now with PwC.</p><p>Similarly, Sandeep Jhunjhunwala, M&amp;A Tax Partner at Nangia Andersen LLP says, “A new remittance tax proposal by the House Republicans could significantly impact NRIs and other foreign nationals living in the United States. This represents a notable shift in US tax policy, particularly for foreign workers. By exempting only US citizens and nationals making remittance through qualified remittance transfer provider, the proposal disproportionately affects millions of lawful immigrants including green card holders, work visa holders, and non-resident aliens, many of whom maintain ongoing financial obligations in their home countries.”</p><p>“In addition to personal remittances, the provision could also affect compensation practices. Many foreign nationals receive RSUs as part of their pay packages. When these RSUs vest and are sold, the sales proceeds are often transferred overseas to home country, for personal use, family support, or investment. Under the proposed remittance tax, such transfers even of post-tax proceeds could attract the 5% excise levy, adding a layer of cost to already-taxed income,&#34; Jhunjhunwala added.</p><p>Ajay Rotti, founder of Tax Compass, a tax consultancy firm too believes that the tax has much larger implications. “A new legislative proposal in the United States, officially titled &#34;The One Big Beautiful Bill,&#34; seeks to impose a 5% excise tax on all international remittances sent by non-citizens. This includes individuals on non-immigrant visas such as H-1B and those holding green cards.&#34;</p><p>&#34;The bill aims to generate revenue from outbound remittances by non-citizens and levies a 5% remittance tax on outward remittance from US. The proposed 5% excise tax on international remittances by non-U.S. citizens is detailed in Section 112105 of the proposed Bill. This section outlines the specifics of the tax, including its applicability to non-citizens sending money abroad. The provision requires that the tax be collected by the remittance transfer providers and the remittance transfer providers are responsible for remitting such tax quarterly to the Secretary of the Treasury,” Rotti added.</p><p>Amarpal Chadha, Tax Partner and Mobility Leader, EY India, says, “The newly introduced U.S. bill proposes a 5% tax on remittances outside US and is currently at an early stage of consideration. The measure—if enacted—could place added financial pressure on Indian nationals working in the United States. Many may be forced to re-evaluate their remittance patterns, including the amount and frequency of remittances for the purpose of maintenance of family or investment in India.”</p><p>A senior Indian government official who did not wish to be named said, &#34;if this law is enacted it would amount to tax treaty override. We know that US constitution allows treaty override,  unlike India where more favourable law prevails, but this would be a very unwelcome treaty override from various countries point of views.&#34;</p><p>For now, this tax is just a proposal—but it’s already set alarm bells ringing across quite a few immigrant communities.</p><p></p><p><br/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","TQQQ":"纳指三倍做多ETF","QQQ":"纳指100ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199930645","content_text":"For many Indian families, it’s been a point of pride – and often livelihood – that their children send money back from the United States. But these families may be in for a bit of a shock – when they see less money in their accounts. That’s because a new tax has been proposed in the US – one that is aimed at these remittances specifically.A U.S. bill proposes a 5% excise tax on any remittances that originate in the US to any other country. Indians are among the top three immigrant communities in the US with nearly 2.3 million Indians working there under various visa programmes. And these Indians account for one of the largest sources of remittances into India. In 2023 alone, they sent home over $23 billion.But it’s not just H-1B, F-1 visa holders and green card holders who will be affected by the new Bill, if it is passed. For non-resident Indians in the US, the proposed tax will apply to any income they earn in the US from investments or stock options as well.So take for instance a typical Indian family in the U.S. which sends home $1,000 a month. With the 5% tax, they will be able to send 50 dollars less. Inversely, they will have to send back a lot more money to offset the tax and ensure their monthly remittances to their families here don’t dip.The Bill, which has been backed by Republicans, is linked to Trump’s broader economic agenda – and it has sparked off debate in Washington D.C.Detractors, especially back here in India, warn that it could push remittances into informal or unregulated channels and make the U.S. less attractive to skilled workers from abroad. Some also argue that this could put pressure on employers to hike salaries just to offset the tax. There is also an argument that the tax unfairly targets legal immigrants, and could damage U.S. ties with countries like India.“This levy clearly discriminates against non-US citizens who are contributing to the US economy in the same way as US citizens do. It is interesting to note that it is proposed to be levied by the same country that found India’s Equalisation Levy to be discriminatory!\" says Akhilesh Ranjan, former Member CBDT, now with PwC.Similarly, Sandeep Jhunjhunwala, M&A Tax Partner at Nangia Andersen LLP says, “A new remittance tax proposal by the House Republicans could significantly impact NRIs and other foreign nationals living in the United States. This represents a notable shift in US tax policy, particularly for foreign workers. By exempting only US citizens and nationals making remittance through qualified remittance transfer provider, the proposal disproportionately affects millions of lawful immigrants including green card holders, work visa holders, and non-resident aliens, many of whom maintain ongoing financial obligations in their home countries.”“In addition to personal remittances, the provision could also affect compensation practices. Many foreign nationals receive RSUs as part of their pay packages. When these RSUs vest and are sold, the sales proceeds are often transferred overseas to home country, for personal use, family support, or investment. Under the proposed remittance tax, such transfers even of post-tax proceeds could attract the 5% excise levy, adding a layer of cost to already-taxed income,\" Jhunjhunwala added.Ajay Rotti, founder of Tax Compass, a tax consultancy firm too believes that the tax has much larger implications. “A new legislative proposal in the United States, officially titled \"The One Big Beautiful Bill,\" seeks to impose a 5% excise tax on all international remittances sent by non-citizens. This includes individuals on non-immigrant visas such as H-1B and those holding green cards.\"\"The bill aims to generate revenue from outbound remittances by non-citizens and levies a 5% remittance tax on outward remittance from US. The proposed 5% excise tax on international remittances by non-U.S. citizens is detailed in Section 112105 of the proposed Bill. This section outlines the specifics of the tax, including its applicability to non-citizens sending money abroad. The provision requires that the tax be collected by the remittance transfer providers and the remittance transfer providers are responsible for remitting such tax quarterly to the Secretary of the Treasury,” Rotti added.Amarpal Chadha, Tax Partner and Mobility Leader, EY India, says, “The newly introduced U.S. bill proposes a 5% tax on remittances outside US and is currently at an early stage of consideration. The measure—if enacted—could place added financial pressure on Indian nationals working in the United States. Many may be forced to re-evaluate their remittance patterns, including the amount and frequency of remittances for the purpose of maintenance of family or investment in India.”A senior Indian government official who did not wish to be named said, \"if this law is enacted it would amount to tax treaty override. We know that US constitution allows treaty override,  unlike India where more favourable law prevails, but this would be a very unwelcome treaty override from various countries point of views.\"For now, this tax is just a proposal—but it’s already set alarm bells ringing across quite a few immigrant communities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":1.1,"SQQQ":1.1,".IXIC":1.1,"QQQ":1.1,"SPY":1.1,".DJI":1.1,"TQQQ":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2431,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":407696593482208,"gmtCreate":1740558704186,"gmtModify":1740559677334,"author":{"id":"4200117619876312","authorId":"4200117619876312","name":"Lie Flat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3e249c158007385e6a5ba35c389c3a48","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4200117619876312","authorIdStr":"4200117619876312"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/FUND/LU0370786039.SGD\">$FIDELITY GREATER CHINA \"A\" (SGD) INC(LU0370786039.SGD)$ </a> why does this fund drop over 2% in it's weekly performance when China stocks are on a bull 🐂 ?&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/FUND/LU0370786039.SGD\">$FIDELITY GREATER CHINA \"A\" (SGD) INC(LU0370786039.SGD)$ </a> why does this fund drop over 2% in it's weekly performance when China stocks are on a bull 🐂 ?&nbsp;","text":"$FIDELITY GREATER CHINA \"A\" (SGD) INC(LU0370786039.SGD)$ why does this fund drop over 2% in it's weekly performance when China stocks are on a bull 🐂 ?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/407696593482208","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2581,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":406922845831824,"gmtCreate":1740373917079,"gmtModify":1740374165352,"author":{"id":"4200117619876312","authorId":"4200117619876312","name":"Lie Flat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3e249c158007385e6a5ba35c389c3a48","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4200117619876312","authorIdStr":"4200117619876312"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Mainly will benefit the big 3 banks . Family office will not want their money in non blue chip .&nbsp;","listText":"Mainly will benefit the big 3 banks . Family office will not want their money in non blue chip .&nbsp;","text":"Mainly will benefit the big 3 banks . Family office will not want their money in non blue chip .","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/406922845831824","repostId":"1127977489","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2592,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":406228666978544,"gmtCreate":1740204538511,"gmtModify":1740205688750,"author":{"id":"4200117619876312","authorId":"4200117619876312","name":"Lie Flat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3e249c158007385e6a5ba35c389c3a48","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4200117619876312","authorIdStr":"4200117619876312"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/FUND/SGXZ58947870.SGD\">$LIONGLOBAL SINGAPORE DIVIDEND EQUITY (SGDHDG) INC(SGXZ58947870.SGD)$ </a> STI index is up for past one&nbsp;week . Why the fund price drop so much today ?&nbsp; Make me wonder how is the NAV calculated .","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/FUND/SGXZ58947870.SGD\">$LIONGLOBAL SINGAPORE DIVIDEND EQUITY (SGDHDG) INC(SGXZ58947870.SGD)$ </a> STI index is up for past one&nbsp;week . Why the fund price drop so much today ?&nbsp; Make me wonder how is the NAV calculated .","text":"$LIONGLOBAL SINGAPORE DIVIDEND EQUITY (SGDHDG) INC(SGXZ58947870.SGD)$ STI index is up for past one week . Why the fund price drop so much today ? Make me wonder how is the NAV calculated .","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/406228666978544","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3429,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":403337022226752,"gmtCreate":1739505313292,"gmtModify":1739506153333,"author":{"id":"4200117619876312","authorId":"4200117619876312","name":"Lie Flat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3e249c158007385e6a5ba35c389c3a48","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4200117619876312","authorIdStr":"4200117619876312"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/FUND/LU2756315664.SGD\">$ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMI\" (SGDHDG) INC(LU2756315664.SGD)$ </a> what does \"AMI \"or \"AM\"&nbsp;mean ?&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/FUND/LU2756315664.SGD\">$ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMI\" (SGDHDG) INC(LU2756315664.SGD)$ </a> what does \"AMI \"or \"AM\"&nbsp;mean ?&nbsp;","text":"$ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMI\" (SGDHDG) INC(LU2756315664.SGD)$ what does \"AMI \"or \"AM\" mean ?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/403337022226752","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2322,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":396853581861328,"gmtCreate":1737913501125,"gmtModify":1737941850323,"author":{"id":"4200117619876312","authorId":"4200117619876312","name":"Lie Flat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3e249c158007385e6a5ba35c389c3a48","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4200117619876312","authorIdStr":"4200117619876312"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/G3B.SI\">$Nikko AM STI ETF(G3B.SI)$ </a> where can I view the historical dividend yield ? Not the payout&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/G3B.SI\">$Nikko AM STI ETF(G3B.SI)$ </a> where can I view the historical dividend yield ? Not the payout&nbsp;","text":"$Nikko AM STI ETF(G3B.SI)$ where can I view the historical dividend yield ? Not the payout","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/396853581861328","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2576,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":396853581861328,"gmtCreate":1737913501125,"gmtModify":1737941850323,"author":{"id":"4200117619876312","authorId":"4200117619876312","name":"Lie Flat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3e249c158007385e6a5ba35c389c3a48","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4200117619876312","authorIdStr":"4200117619876312"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/G3B.SI\">$Nikko AM STI ETF(G3B.SI)$ </a> where can I view the historical dividend yield ? Not the payout&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/S/G3B.SI\">$Nikko AM STI ETF(G3B.SI)$ </a> where can I view the historical dividend yield ? Not the payout&nbsp;","text":"$Nikko AM STI ETF(G3B.SI)$ where can I view the historical dividend yield ? Not the payout","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/396853581861328","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2576,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":406228666978544,"gmtCreate":1740204538511,"gmtModify":1740205688750,"author":{"id":"4200117619876312","authorId":"4200117619876312","name":"Lie Flat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3e249c158007385e6a5ba35c389c3a48","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4200117619876312","authorIdStr":"4200117619876312"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/FUND/SGXZ58947870.SGD\">$LIONGLOBAL SINGAPORE DIVIDEND EQUITY (SGDHDG) INC(SGXZ58947870.SGD)$ </a> STI index is up for past one&nbsp;week . Why the fund price drop so much today ?&nbsp; Make me wonder how is the NAV calculated .","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/FUND/SGXZ58947870.SGD\">$LIONGLOBAL SINGAPORE DIVIDEND EQUITY (SGDHDG) INC(SGXZ58947870.SGD)$ </a> STI index is up for past one&nbsp;week . Why the fund price drop so much today ?&nbsp; Make me wonder how is the NAV calculated .","text":"$LIONGLOBAL SINGAPORE DIVIDEND EQUITY (SGDHDG) INC(SGXZ58947870.SGD)$ STI index is up for past one week . Why the fund price drop so much today ? Make me wonder how is the NAV calculated .","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/406228666978544","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3429,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":489764484526360,"gmtCreate":1760594684236,"gmtModify":1760594687963,"author":{"id":"4200117619876312","authorId":"4200117619876312","name":"Lie Flat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3e249c158007385e6a5ba35c389c3a48","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4200117619876312","authorIdStr":"4200117619876312"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"China stock are sprinter not marathon. Short burst then fall off","listText":"China stock are sprinter not marathon. Short burst then fall off","text":"China stock are sprinter not marathon. Short burst then fall off","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/489764484526360","repostId":"1188864944","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1188864944","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1760593780,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1188864944?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-10-16 13:49","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Singapore Wealth Fund Accuses EV Maker NIO of Inflating Revenue, Bloomberg Reports","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1188864944","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund has sued Nio in a US court, accusing the Chinese electric vehicle maker and executives of violating securities laws by inflating revenues, Bloomberg reported.The...","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund has sued NIO in a US court, accusing the Chinese electric vehicle maker and executives of violating securities laws by inflating revenues, Bloomberg reported.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The lawsuit, filed in August in the Southern District of New York, named the company, Chief Executive Officer Li Bin and former Chief Financial Officer Feng Wei as defendants. NIO shares dropped as much as 9.7% in Hong Kong and 9.8% in Singapore on Thursday, and its US-listed shares sank 7.1% in overnight trading.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/75cf0e9eb4ef6705dc909ba1b2084aa4\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"392\" tg-height=\"200\"/></p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">GIC alleged the defendants made “materially false and/or misleading statements” about NIO’s ties to an affiliated company called NIO Battery Asset Co. — or Weineng in Chinese — and failed to disclose key facts about its business and finances.</p><p>According to the complaint, those misstatements artificially inflated the value of NIO’s securities, causing GIC to suffer “significant losses.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">NIO operates a battery subscription model in which car buyers don’t have to purchase batteries outright. Instead, they can pay a recurring fee to access the company’s network of battery-swap stations.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">GIC’s suit contended that Weineng’s financial records show it bought batteries upfront from NIO, allowing NIO to immediately record the full revenue from those sales — even though the end users hadn’t yet paid for the batteries. The filing argued that such income should have been recognized gradually, not all at once.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">NIO didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. GIC declined to comment to Bloomberg.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The case has been stayed by a judge as it’s similar to a previous suit filed in 2022 against NIO, according to an Oct. 3 filing.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">NIO, founded in 2014, was once seen as rising star in the EV industry that could eventually rival Tesla Inc. It’s known for its battery swap technology, which allows owners to switch out a depleted battery for a new one in minutes. Buyers have the option to purchase a NIO EV without the battery and instead opt for a subscription.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">But this business model is capital intensive and has required building out expensive swapping stations, and the company has faced severe liquidity crises.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">A 2022 report from New York-based Grizzly Research detailed these accounting practices. NIO said in response that it would launch an independent committee to investigate the claims, according to the court filings.</p><p>That led NIO’s American depositary notes to plunge, resulting in substantial losses, GIC’s filing said. The fund is seeking compensation for all losses relating to NIO’s wrongdoing and reasonable reimbursement of its legal costs, according to the documents.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Singapore Wealth Fund Accuses EV Maker NIO of Inflating Revenue, Bloomberg Reports</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSingapore Wealth Fund Accuses EV Maker NIO of Inflating Revenue, Bloomberg Reports\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-10-16 13:49</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund has sued NIO in a US court, accusing the Chinese electric vehicle maker and executives of violating securities laws by inflating revenues, Bloomberg reported.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The lawsuit, filed in August in the Southern District of New York, named the company, Chief Executive Officer Li Bin and former Chief Financial Officer Feng Wei as defendants. NIO shares dropped as much as 9.7% in Hong Kong and 9.8% in Singapore on Thursday, and its US-listed shares sank 7.1% in overnight trading.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/75cf0e9eb4ef6705dc909ba1b2084aa4\" title=\"\" tg-width=\"392\" tg-height=\"200\"/></p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">GIC alleged the defendants made “materially false and/or misleading statements” about NIO’s ties to an affiliated company called NIO Battery Asset Co. — or Weineng in Chinese — and failed to disclose key facts about its business and finances.</p><p>According to the complaint, those misstatements artificially inflated the value of NIO’s securities, causing GIC to suffer “significant losses.”</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">NIO operates a battery subscription model in which car buyers don’t have to purchase batteries outright. Instead, they can pay a recurring fee to access the company’s network of battery-swap stations.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">GIC’s suit contended that Weineng’s financial records show it bought batteries upfront from NIO, allowing NIO to immediately record the full revenue from those sales — even though the end users hadn’t yet paid for the batteries. The filing argued that such income should have been recognized gradually, not all at once.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">NIO didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. GIC declined to comment to Bloomberg.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">The case has been stayed by a judge as it’s similar to a previous suit filed in 2022 against NIO, according to an Oct. 3 filing.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">NIO, founded in 2014, was once seen as rising star in the EV industry that could eventually rival Tesla Inc. It’s known for its battery swap technology, which allows owners to switch out a depleted battery for a new one in minutes. Buyers have the option to purchase a NIO EV without the battery and instead opt for a subscription.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">But this business model is capital intensive and has required building out expensive swapping stations, and the company has faced severe liquidity crises.</p><p style=\"text-align: start;\">A 2022 report from New York-based Grizzly Research detailed these accounting practices. NIO said in response that it would launch an independent committee to investigate the claims, according to the court filings.</p><p>That led NIO’s American depositary notes to plunge, resulting in substantial losses, GIC’s filing said. The fund is seeking compensation for all losses relating to NIO’s wrongdoing and reasonable reimbursement of its legal costs, according to the documents.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09866":"蔚来-SW","NIO.SI":"蔚来","NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1188864944","content_text":"Singapore’s sovereign wealth fund has sued NIO in a US court, accusing the Chinese electric vehicle maker and executives of violating securities laws by inflating revenues, Bloomberg reported.The lawsuit, filed in August in the Southern District of New York, named the company, Chief Executive Officer Li Bin and former Chief Financial Officer Feng Wei as defendants. NIO shares dropped as much as 9.7% in Hong Kong and 9.8% in Singapore on Thursday, and its US-listed shares sank 7.1% in overnight trading.GIC alleged the defendants made “materially false and/or misleading statements” about NIO’s ties to an affiliated company called NIO Battery Asset Co. — or Weineng in Chinese — and failed to disclose key facts about its business and finances.According to the complaint, those misstatements artificially inflated the value of NIO’s securities, causing GIC to suffer “significant losses.”NIO operates a battery subscription model in which car buyers don’t have to purchase batteries outright. Instead, they can pay a recurring fee to access the company’s network of battery-swap stations.GIC’s suit contended that Weineng’s financial records show it bought batteries upfront from NIO, allowing NIO to immediately record the full revenue from those sales — even though the end users hadn’t yet paid for the batteries. The filing argued that such income should have been recognized gradually, not all at once.NIO didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment. GIC declined to comment to Bloomberg.The case has been stayed by a judge as it’s similar to a previous suit filed in 2022 against NIO, according to an Oct. 3 filing.NIO, founded in 2014, was once seen as rising star in the EV industry that could eventually rival Tesla Inc. It’s known for its battery swap technology, which allows owners to switch out a depleted battery for a new one in minutes. Buyers have the option to purchase a NIO EV without the battery and instead opt for a subscription.But this business model is capital intensive and has required building out expensive swapping stations, and the company has faced severe liquidity crises.A 2022 report from New York-based Grizzly Research detailed these accounting practices. NIO said in response that it would launch an independent committee to investigate the claims, according to the court filings.That led NIO’s American depositary notes to plunge, resulting in substantial losses, GIC’s filing said. The fund is seeking compensation for all losses relating to NIO’s wrongdoing and reasonable reimbursement of its legal costs, according to the documents.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NIO":1.1,"NIO.SI":1.1,"09866":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1381,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":436074849095880,"gmtCreate":1747499861882,"gmtModify":1747499865817,"author":{"id":"4200117619876312","authorId":"4200117619876312","name":"Lie Flat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3e249c158007385e6a5ba35c389c3a48","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4200117619876312","authorIdStr":"4200117619876312"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Does this include capital gain from US stocks?&nbsp;","listText":"Does this include capital gain from US stocks?&nbsp;","text":"Does this include capital gain from US stocks?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/436074849095880","repostId":"1199930645","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199930645","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1747474971,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199930645?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-05-17 17:42","market":"us","language":"en","title":"USA Proposes 5% Tax on Remittances by Non-Citizens – What It Could Mean for Indians","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199930645","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"For many Indian families, it’s been a point of pride – and often livelihood – that their children send money back from the United States. But these families may be in for a bit of a shock – when they ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>For many Indian families, it’s been a point of pride – and often livelihood – that their children send money back from the United States. But these families may be in for a bit of a shock – when they see less money in their accounts. That’s because a new tax has been proposed in the US – one that is aimed at these remittances specifically.</p><p>A U.S. bill proposes a 5% excise tax on any remittances that originate in the US to any other country. Indians are among the top three immigrant communities in the US with nearly 2.3 million Indians working there under various visa programmes. And these Indians account for one of the largest sources of remittances into India. In 2023 alone, they sent home over $23 billion.</p><p>But it’s not just H-1B, F-1 visa holders and green card holders who will be affected by the new Bill, if it is passed. For non-resident Indians in the US, the proposed tax will apply to any income they earn in the US from investments or stock options as well.</p><p>So take for instance a typical Indian family in the U.S. which sends home $1,000 a month. With the 5% tax, they will be able to send 50 dollars less. Inversely, they will have to send back a lot more money to offset the tax and ensure their monthly remittances to their families here don’t dip.</p><p>The Bill, which has been backed by Republicans, is linked to Trump’s broader economic agenda – and it has sparked off debate in Washington D.C.</p><p>Detractors, especially back here in India, warn that it could push remittances into informal or unregulated channels and make the U.S. less attractive to skilled workers from abroad. Some also argue that this could put pressure on employers to hike salaries just to offset the tax. There is also an argument that the tax unfairly targets legal immigrants, and could damage U.S. ties with countries like India.</p><p>“This levy clearly discriminates against non-US citizens who are contributing to the US economy in the same way as US citizens do. It is interesting to note that it is proposed to be levied by the same country that found India’s Equalisation Levy to be discriminatory!&#34; says Akhilesh Ranjan, former Member CBDT, now with PwC.</p><p>Similarly, Sandeep Jhunjhunwala, M&amp;A Tax Partner at Nangia Andersen LLP says, “A new remittance tax proposal by the House Republicans could significantly impact NRIs and other foreign nationals living in the United States. This represents a notable shift in US tax policy, particularly for foreign workers. By exempting only US citizens and nationals making remittance through qualified remittance transfer provider, the proposal disproportionately affects millions of lawful immigrants including green card holders, work visa holders, and non-resident aliens, many of whom maintain ongoing financial obligations in their home countries.”</p><p>“In addition to personal remittances, the provision could also affect compensation practices. Many foreign nationals receive RSUs as part of their pay packages. When these RSUs vest and are sold, the sales proceeds are often transferred overseas to home country, for personal use, family support, or investment. Under the proposed remittance tax, such transfers even of post-tax proceeds could attract the 5% excise levy, adding a layer of cost to already-taxed income,&#34; Jhunjhunwala added.</p><p>Ajay Rotti, founder of Tax Compass, a tax consultancy firm too believes that the tax has much larger implications. “A new legislative proposal in the United States, officially titled &#34;The One Big Beautiful Bill,&#34; seeks to impose a 5% excise tax on all international remittances sent by non-citizens. This includes individuals on non-immigrant visas such as H-1B and those holding green cards.&#34;</p><p>&#34;The bill aims to generate revenue from outbound remittances by non-citizens and levies a 5% remittance tax on outward remittance from US. The proposed 5% excise tax on international remittances by non-U.S. citizens is detailed in Section 112105 of the proposed Bill. This section outlines the specifics of the tax, including its applicability to non-citizens sending money abroad. The provision requires that the tax be collected by the remittance transfer providers and the remittance transfer providers are responsible for remitting such tax quarterly to the Secretary of the Treasury,” Rotti added.</p><p>Amarpal Chadha, Tax Partner and Mobility Leader, EY India, says, “The newly introduced U.S. bill proposes a 5% tax on remittances outside US and is currently at an early stage of consideration. The measure—if enacted—could place added financial pressure on Indian nationals working in the United States. Many may be forced to re-evaluate their remittance patterns, including the amount and frequency of remittances for the purpose of maintenance of family or investment in India.”</p><p>A senior Indian government official who did not wish to be named said, &#34;if this law is enacted it would amount to tax treaty override. We know that US constitution allows treaty override,  unlike India where more favourable law prevails, but this would be a very unwelcome treaty override from various countries point of views.&#34;</p><p>For now, this tax is just a proposal—but it’s already set alarm bells ringing across quite a few immigrant communities.</p><p></p><p><br/></p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>USA Proposes 5% Tax on Remittances by Non-Citizens – What It Could Mean for Indians</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nUSA Proposes 5% Tax on Remittances by Non-Citizens – What It Could Mean for Indians\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-05-17 17:42</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>For many Indian families, it’s been a point of pride – and often livelihood – that their children send money back from the United States. But these families may be in for a bit of a shock – when they see less money in their accounts. That’s because a new tax has been proposed in the US – one that is aimed at these remittances specifically.</p><p>A U.S. bill proposes a 5% excise tax on any remittances that originate in the US to any other country. Indians are among the top three immigrant communities in the US with nearly 2.3 million Indians working there under various visa programmes. And these Indians account for one of the largest sources of remittances into India. In 2023 alone, they sent home over $23 billion.</p><p>But it’s not just H-1B, F-1 visa holders and green card holders who will be affected by the new Bill, if it is passed. For non-resident Indians in the US, the proposed tax will apply to any income they earn in the US from investments or stock options as well.</p><p>So take for instance a typical Indian family in the U.S. which sends home $1,000 a month. With the 5% tax, they will be able to send 50 dollars less. Inversely, they will have to send back a lot more money to offset the tax and ensure their monthly remittances to their families here don’t dip.</p><p>The Bill, which has been backed by Republicans, is linked to Trump’s broader economic agenda – and it has sparked off debate in Washington D.C.</p><p>Detractors, especially back here in India, warn that it could push remittances into informal or unregulated channels and make the U.S. less attractive to skilled workers from abroad. Some also argue that this could put pressure on employers to hike salaries just to offset the tax. There is also an argument that the tax unfairly targets legal immigrants, and could damage U.S. ties with countries like India.</p><p>“This levy clearly discriminates against non-US citizens who are contributing to the US economy in the same way as US citizens do. It is interesting to note that it is proposed to be levied by the same country that found India’s Equalisation Levy to be discriminatory!&#34; says Akhilesh Ranjan, former Member CBDT, now with PwC.</p><p>Similarly, Sandeep Jhunjhunwala, M&amp;A Tax Partner at Nangia Andersen LLP says, “A new remittance tax proposal by the House Republicans could significantly impact NRIs and other foreign nationals living in the United States. This represents a notable shift in US tax policy, particularly for foreign workers. By exempting only US citizens and nationals making remittance through qualified remittance transfer provider, the proposal disproportionately affects millions of lawful immigrants including green card holders, work visa holders, and non-resident aliens, many of whom maintain ongoing financial obligations in their home countries.”</p><p>“In addition to personal remittances, the provision could also affect compensation practices. Many foreign nationals receive RSUs as part of their pay packages. When these RSUs vest and are sold, the sales proceeds are often transferred overseas to home country, for personal use, family support, or investment. Under the proposed remittance tax, such transfers even of post-tax proceeds could attract the 5% excise levy, adding a layer of cost to already-taxed income,&#34; Jhunjhunwala added.</p><p>Ajay Rotti, founder of Tax Compass, a tax consultancy firm too believes that the tax has much larger implications. “A new legislative proposal in the United States, officially titled &#34;The One Big Beautiful Bill,&#34; seeks to impose a 5% excise tax on all international remittances sent by non-citizens. This includes individuals on non-immigrant visas such as H-1B and those holding green cards.&#34;</p><p>&#34;The bill aims to generate revenue from outbound remittances by non-citizens and levies a 5% remittance tax on outward remittance from US. The proposed 5% excise tax on international remittances by non-U.S. citizens is detailed in Section 112105 of the proposed Bill. This section outlines the specifics of the tax, including its applicability to non-citizens sending money abroad. The provision requires that the tax be collected by the remittance transfer providers and the remittance transfer providers are responsible for remitting such tax quarterly to the Secretary of the Treasury,” Rotti added.</p><p>Amarpal Chadha, Tax Partner and Mobility Leader, EY India, says, “The newly introduced U.S. bill proposes a 5% tax on remittances outside US and is currently at an early stage of consideration. The measure—if enacted—could place added financial pressure on Indian nationals working in the United States. Many may be forced to re-evaluate their remittance patterns, including the amount and frequency of remittances for the purpose of maintenance of family or investment in India.”</p><p>A senior Indian government official who did not wish to be named said, &#34;if this law is enacted it would amount to tax treaty override. We know that US constitution allows treaty override,  unlike India where more favourable law prevails, but this would be a very unwelcome treaty override from various countries point of views.&#34;</p><p>For now, this tax is just a proposal—but it’s already set alarm bells ringing across quite a few immigrant communities.</p><p></p><p><br/></p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SQQQ":"纳指三倍做空ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","TQQQ":"纳指三倍做多ETF","QQQ":"纳指100ETF",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199930645","content_text":"For many Indian families, it’s been a point of pride – and often livelihood – that their children send money back from the United States. But these families may be in for a bit of a shock – when they see less money in their accounts. That’s because a new tax has been proposed in the US – one that is aimed at these remittances specifically.A U.S. bill proposes a 5% excise tax on any remittances that originate in the US to any other country. Indians are among the top three immigrant communities in the US with nearly 2.3 million Indians working there under various visa programmes. And these Indians account for one of the largest sources of remittances into India. In 2023 alone, they sent home over $23 billion.But it’s not just H-1B, F-1 visa holders and green card holders who will be affected by the new Bill, if it is passed. For non-resident Indians in the US, the proposed tax will apply to any income they earn in the US from investments or stock options as well.So take for instance a typical Indian family in the U.S. which sends home $1,000 a month. With the 5% tax, they will be able to send 50 dollars less. Inversely, they will have to send back a lot more money to offset the tax and ensure their monthly remittances to their families here don’t dip.The Bill, which has been backed by Republicans, is linked to Trump’s broader economic agenda – and it has sparked off debate in Washington D.C.Detractors, especially back here in India, warn that it could push remittances into informal or unregulated channels and make the U.S. less attractive to skilled workers from abroad. Some also argue that this could put pressure on employers to hike salaries just to offset the tax. There is also an argument that the tax unfairly targets legal immigrants, and could damage U.S. ties with countries like India.“This levy clearly discriminates against non-US citizens who are contributing to the US economy in the same way as US citizens do. It is interesting to note that it is proposed to be levied by the same country that found India’s Equalisation Levy to be discriminatory!\" says Akhilesh Ranjan, former Member CBDT, now with PwC.Similarly, Sandeep Jhunjhunwala, M&A Tax Partner at Nangia Andersen LLP says, “A new remittance tax proposal by the House Republicans could significantly impact NRIs and other foreign nationals living in the United States. This represents a notable shift in US tax policy, particularly for foreign workers. By exempting only US citizens and nationals making remittance through qualified remittance transfer provider, the proposal disproportionately affects millions of lawful immigrants including green card holders, work visa holders, and non-resident aliens, many of whom maintain ongoing financial obligations in their home countries.”“In addition to personal remittances, the provision could also affect compensation practices. Many foreign nationals receive RSUs as part of their pay packages. When these RSUs vest and are sold, the sales proceeds are often transferred overseas to home country, for personal use, family support, or investment. Under the proposed remittance tax, such transfers even of post-tax proceeds could attract the 5% excise levy, adding a layer of cost to already-taxed income,\" Jhunjhunwala added.Ajay Rotti, founder of Tax Compass, a tax consultancy firm too believes that the tax has much larger implications. “A new legislative proposal in the United States, officially titled \"The One Big Beautiful Bill,\" seeks to impose a 5% excise tax on all international remittances sent by non-citizens. This includes individuals on non-immigrant visas such as H-1B and those holding green cards.\"\"The bill aims to generate revenue from outbound remittances by non-citizens and levies a 5% remittance tax on outward remittance from US. The proposed 5% excise tax on international remittances by non-U.S. citizens is detailed in Section 112105 of the proposed Bill. This section outlines the specifics of the tax, including its applicability to non-citizens sending money abroad. The provision requires that the tax be collected by the remittance transfer providers and the remittance transfer providers are responsible for remitting such tax quarterly to the Secretary of the Treasury,” Rotti added.Amarpal Chadha, Tax Partner and Mobility Leader, EY India, says, “The newly introduced U.S. bill proposes a 5% tax on remittances outside US and is currently at an early stage of consideration. The measure—if enacted—could place added financial pressure on Indian nationals working in the United States. Many may be forced to re-evaluate their remittance patterns, including the amount and frequency of remittances for the purpose of maintenance of family or investment in India.”A senior Indian government official who did not wish to be named said, \"if this law is enacted it would amount to tax treaty override. We know that US constitution allows treaty override,  unlike India where more favourable law prevails, but this would be a very unwelcome treaty override from various countries point of views.\"For now, this tax is just a proposal—but it’s already set alarm bells ringing across quite a few immigrant communities.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".SPX":1.1,"SQQQ":1.1,".IXIC":1.1,"QQQ":1.1,"SPY":1.1,".DJI":1.1,"TQQQ":1.1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2431,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":438067292438736,"gmtCreate":1747984248998,"gmtModify":1747984252892,"author":{"id":"4200117619876312","authorId":"4200117619876312","name":"Lie Flat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3e249c158007385e6a5ba35c389c3a48","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4200117619876312","authorIdStr":"4200117619876312"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"No problem. Just a storm not tsunami&nbsp;","listText":"No problem. Just a storm not tsunami&nbsp;","text":"No problem. Just a storm not tsunami","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/438067292438736","repostId":"1109013097","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1109013097","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Track stock‘s movements and relevant news","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Stock Track","id":"1086803395","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a81accab1e7ee4144dc051f71903a390"},"pubTimestamp":1747967303,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1109013097?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2025-05-23 10:28","market":"sg","language":"en","title":"YZJ Shipbldg SGD Plummets 4.67% as Q1 Order Intake Disappoints Investors","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1109013097","media":"Stock Track","summary":"Shares of YZJ Shipbldg SGD  plunged 3.27% in Friday's trading session, as investors reacted to the company's disappointing first-quarter order intake report. The Chinese shipbuilder secured only six vessel orders worth US$300 million in Q1 2025, accounting for a mere 5% of its US$6 billion annual target.The weak performance stands in stark contrast to the same period last year when Yangzijiang won orders for 38 vessels valued at US$3.3 billion, representing 74% of its target. Executive Chairman ","content":"<p>Shares of YZJ Shipbldg SGD (BS6.SI) plunged 3.27% in Friday's trading session, as investors reacted to the company's disappointing first-quarter order intake report. The Chinese shipbuilder secured only six vessel orders worth US$300 million in Q1 2025, accounting for a mere 5% of its US$6 billion annual target.</p><p>The weak performance stands in stark contrast to the same period last year when Yangzijiang won orders for 38 vessels valued at US$3.3 billion, representing 74% of its target. Executive Chairman and CEO Ren Letian attributed the slowdown to U.S. policies and global trade tariffs, which have led customers to adopt a cautious stance, delaying new vessel commitments.</p><p>Despite the setback in new orders, Yangzijiang reported steady progress in vessel deliveries, with no delays or cancellations to date. The company has delivered 21 ships, or 38% of its 56-vessel target for the fiscal year, and maintains a strong order backlog of 230 vessels worth US$23.2 billion. This backlog ensures revenue visibility through 2028, potentially offering some consolation to worried investors. However, the market's immediate reaction suggests concerns over the company's ability to meet its ambitious annual targets in the face of challenging global trade conditions.</p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BS6.SI\">YZJ Shipbldg SGD</a> tumbles 4.67% at 10:59 am, May 23rd.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/aee5ed56fa93530c710e81d356def5da\" tg-width=\"891\" tg-height=\"637\"></p><p></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>YZJ Shipbldg SGD Plummets 4.67% as Q1 Order Intake Disappoints Investors</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nYZJ Shipbldg SGD Plummets 4.67% as Q1 Order Intake Disappoints Investors\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1086803395\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/a81accab1e7ee4144dc051f71903a390);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Stock Track </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2025-05-23 10:28</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Shares of YZJ Shipbldg SGD (BS6.SI) plunged 3.27% in Friday's trading session, as investors reacted to the company's disappointing first-quarter order intake report. The Chinese shipbuilder secured only six vessel orders worth US$300 million in Q1 2025, accounting for a mere 5% of its US$6 billion annual target.</p><p>The weak performance stands in stark contrast to the same period last year when Yangzijiang won orders for 38 vessels valued at US$3.3 billion, representing 74% of its target. Executive Chairman and CEO Ren Letian attributed the slowdown to U.S. policies and global trade tariffs, which have led customers to adopt a cautious stance, delaying new vessel commitments.</p><p>Despite the setback in new orders, Yangzijiang reported steady progress in vessel deliveries, with no delays or cancellations to date. The company has delivered 21 ships, or 38% of its 56-vessel target for the fiscal year, and maintains a strong order backlog of 230 vessels worth US$23.2 billion. This backlog ensures revenue visibility through 2028, potentially offering some consolation to worried investors. However, the market's immediate reaction suggests concerns over the company's ability to meet its ambitious annual targets in the face of challenging global trade conditions.</p><p> <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BS6.SI\">YZJ Shipbldg SGD</a> tumbles 4.67% at 10:59 am, May 23rd.</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/aee5ed56fa93530c710e81d356def5da\" tg-width=\"891\" tg-height=\"637\"></p><p></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BS6.SI":"扬子江船业"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1109013097","content_text":"Shares of YZJ Shipbldg SGD (BS6.SI) plunged 3.27% in Friday's trading session, as investors reacted to the company's disappointing first-quarter order intake report. The Chinese shipbuilder secured only six vessel orders worth US$300 million in Q1 2025, accounting for a mere 5% of its US$6 billion annual target.The weak performance stands in stark contrast to the same period last year when Yangzijiang won orders for 38 vessels valued at US$3.3 billion, representing 74% of its target. Executive Chairman and CEO Ren Letian attributed the slowdown to U.S. policies and global trade tariffs, which have led customers to adopt a cautious stance, delaying new vessel commitments.Despite the setback in new orders, Yangzijiang reported steady progress in vessel deliveries, with no delays or cancellations to date. The company has delivered 21 ships, or 38% of its 56-vessel target for the fiscal year, and maintains a strong order backlog of 230 vessels worth US$23.2 billion. This backlog ensures revenue visibility through 2028, potentially offering some consolation to worried investors. However, the market's immediate reaction suggests concerns over the company's ability to meet its ambitious annual targets in the face of challenging global trade conditions. YZJ Shipbldg SGD tumbles 4.67% at 10:59 am, May 23rd.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BS6.SI":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2041,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":407696593482208,"gmtCreate":1740558704186,"gmtModify":1740559677334,"author":{"id":"4200117619876312","authorId":"4200117619876312","name":"Lie Flat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3e249c158007385e6a5ba35c389c3a48","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4200117619876312","authorIdStr":"4200117619876312"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/FUND/LU0370786039.SGD\">$FIDELITY GREATER CHINA \"A\" (SGD) INC(LU0370786039.SGD)$ </a> why does this fund drop over 2% in it's weekly performance when China stocks are on a bull 🐂 ?&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/FUND/LU0370786039.SGD\">$FIDELITY GREATER CHINA \"A\" (SGD) INC(LU0370786039.SGD)$ </a> why does this fund drop over 2% in it's weekly performance when China stocks are on a bull 🐂 ?&nbsp;","text":"$FIDELITY GREATER CHINA \"A\" (SGD) INC(LU0370786039.SGD)$ why does this fund drop over 2% in it's weekly performance when China stocks are on a bull 🐂 ?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/407696593482208","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2581,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":406922845831824,"gmtCreate":1740373917079,"gmtModify":1740374165352,"author":{"id":"4200117619876312","authorId":"4200117619876312","name":"Lie Flat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3e249c158007385e6a5ba35c389c3a48","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4200117619876312","authorIdStr":"4200117619876312"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Mainly will benefit the big 3 banks . Family office will not want their money in non blue chip .&nbsp;","listText":"Mainly will benefit the big 3 banks . Family office will not want their money in non blue chip .&nbsp;","text":"Mainly will benefit the big 3 banks . Family office will not want their money in non blue chip .","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/406922845831824","repostId":"1127977489","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2592,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":403337022226752,"gmtCreate":1739505313292,"gmtModify":1739506153333,"author":{"id":"4200117619876312","authorId":"4200117619876312","name":"Lie Flat","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/3e249c158007385e6a5ba35c389c3a48","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4200117619876312","authorIdStr":"4200117619876312"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/FUND/LU2756315664.SGD\">$ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMI\" (SGDHDG) INC(LU2756315664.SGD)$ </a> what does \"AMI \"or \"AM\"&nbsp;mean ?&nbsp;","listText":"<a href=\"https://ttm.financial/FUND/LU2756315664.SGD\">$ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMI\" (SGDHDG) INC(LU2756315664.SGD)$ </a> what does \"AMI \"or \"AM\"&nbsp;mean ?&nbsp;","text":"$ALLIANZ INCOME AND GROWTH \"AMI\" (SGDHDG) INC(LU2756315664.SGD)$ what does \"AMI \"or \"AM\" mean ?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/403337022226752","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2322,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}