To The Moon

$C3.ai, Inc.(AI)$ C3.ai has honestly been one of my biggest investing regrets so far. My position is currently sitting at almost a 75% paper loss, and looking back, I can admit that I got caught up in the hype surrounding AI stocks a few years ago. At that time, anything related to artificial intelligence was flying, and C3.ai was marketed as one of the few "pure AI" companies in the market. Instead of focusing deeply on fundamentals, profitability, and execution, I treated it more like a meme trade and speculative bet on the AI narrative. Thankfully, the position size was never very large, which is why I'm still comfortable holding and averaging down today. My strategy now is less about believing C3.ai will become the next great software giant

$VITASOY INT'L(00345)$ 😩😩維他奶信左朋友買，但係走勢太詭異，任何情況拉升我都會走一走[愤怒]  ，最多低位入返，都唔知什麼時候可以見家鄉

$VITASOY INT'L(00345)$ 今日維他奶表現了一奶救全家的力量[流泪]  [流泪]  [流泪]  依d係玄學，你問我，我都係唔明👉🏻👈🏻🐷

$IAU 20260515 86.0 CALL$ $IAU 20260515 86.0 CALL$ $IAU 20260515 86.0 CALL$  Earn a cruise trip of premium while keeping my 100 shares of IAU 

$NVDA VERTICAL 260529 PUT 180.0/PUT 185.0$ Profit taking at 86% to free up capital for better trades, 14 days left before expiration.

$NVDA 20260522 207.5 PUT$ Should be another good earnings but factoring that it has been going up for last few days. I dare not put a high strike price. Get to walk away with $235 if it expires worthless 

$NVDA 20260522 210.0 PUT$ Another put and hope it stays above the strike price next week

$ONDS VERTICAL 260515 PUT 10.5/PUT 12.5$ Lost this one as the share dropped against expectations loss out

$IREN 20260626 45.0 PUT$ One of the strongest data centers and has partnership with NVDA.

$NVDA 20260605 175.0 PUT$ Closing at 74% profit to redeploy capital in better trades. NVDA earning call on 20 May.

$SBUX DIAGONAL 260717/260522 CALL 110.0/CALL 105.0$ Rolled to higher strike for higher capital gain and additional premium.

$TNA 20260618 47.0 PUT$ My first put after keeping full cash for a month since start of the truce. First bullet of my stash, have been aiming to get some TNA in my portfolio since 3 years ago.

$YINN DIAGONAL 260529/260522 PUT 32.5/PUT 33.0$ Diagonal roll Yinn cash secured put +1 week to lower strike and collect credit 

$Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$ Recently, I've continued to DCA into PLTR despite the sharp pullback, mainly because I believe the market is currently rotating away from software and AI-related names in the short term. Sentiment toward high-valuation software stocks has clearly weakened as investors move back into semiconductors, industrials, and defensive sectors. But from my experience, market themes always rotate. Strong companies with real revenue growth and strategic positioning tend to recover once sentiment stabilizes again. What gives me confidence in PLTR is that the company is no longer just a 'story stock." Over the past few quarters, Palantir has consistently delivered strong commercial growth, improving profitability, and expa

$JD.com(JD)$ 仲諗住s.p強勢股贏面會比較高。結果無太大壞消息都可以回到咁。想出貨變接貨。今次慘啦我[摊手]  

$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ Buy back at this price but prize droppi g. Too bad but will sell covered call again

$TZA 20260618 8.0 CALL$ TZA largest positions are inverse swaps on the Russell 2000 (notably a $609M short position in "RUSS 2000 INDX SMALL SWAP" and a $142.5M short position in "RUSSELL 2000 INDEX SWAP"). These swaps are designed to profit from a fall in the Russell 2000 index.  

$MSTR VERTICAL 260522 PUT 155.0/PUT 152.5$ MSTR's stock is highly correlated with Bitcoin price. The company's recent Q1 loss and shift towards active Bitcoin sales suggest fundamental pressure. 

$ProShares UltraPro QQQ(TQQQ)$ 百子千孫論TQQQ 常言道：「冇比較，冇傷害。」但很多時候，傷害並非來自你自己想比較，而是別人必然會將你與類似的人比較，然後丟下一句：「你冇得同人比。」心靈便受到傷害。 在ETF的世界裡，QQQ與TQQQ便經常被拿來比較。兩者同樣追蹤「納斯達克100指數」，投資的是美國最大的100家非金融公司（如Apple、NVIDIA等）。分別在於，阿哥QQQ沒有使用槓桿，細佬TQQQ則標榜提供「單日」投資報酬率的3倍放大效果。 市場對兩者的評價非常鮮明：阿哥斯斯文文、老老實實，沒有隱藏收費，開支比率僅0.18%；細佬則比較花弗、好高騖遠，開支比率為0.82%，還「死充大頭鬼」玩三倍槓桿。憑藉這些誰也看得出的表面特徵，各界輕易得出結論——阿哥是可以託付終身的伴侶（適合長期持有），細佬則偶爾見面尚可，若託付終身，結果將會死得好慘，因為TQQQ波動和風險都遠高於一般ETF，在盤整或下跌時，損耗會非常驚人。 然而，做研究最忌輕信外表。筆者決定深入一點，明查暗訪兩者的真實歷史。 結果發現，兩者皆曾大上大落，後者因槓桿關係更見誇張。但那些被形容為「食人唔吐骨」的波動損耗，並未令TQQQ煙消雲散。相反，它不斷「開枝散葉」——上市至今十六年，已分割了八次，當中七次是二拆一，更有一次是三拆一。反觀大哥QQQ，只在上市翌年做過一次二拆一。 TQQQ十六年分拆八次，平均兩年一次。每次分割的最低要求（筆者假設是破百元才分割），變相告訴我們一個祕密：TQQQ大約每兩年便倍翻一次。對於這個鮮為人知的發現，筆者的心情有如當年哥倫布發現新大陸般興奮，因為這並非我意料之內。 為了追求真相，筆者決意掘深一點。假設投資者於兩者上市時各買入一股，此後沒有再增持（QQQ於