Four Raises in One Week. The First One Is Already Below Its Placement Price

Marktomarket
08-24 16:27
Reward Tiger-CoinsReward 500 Tiger-coins

Hello. Last friday's US session was a quiet one — $Invesco QQQ(QQQ)$ closed up 0.35 per cent, $SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust(SPY)$ 0.41 per cent and the Dow 0.98 per cent — though the week as a whole still finished lower.

What mattered happened after the close.

On 23 August $BABA-W(09988)$ announced and priced a placement of new shares worth HK$80 billion, about US$10.2 billion, sold at an 8.4 per cent discount, with the net proceeds going into full-stack AI infrastructure.

That is the fourth such raise in the same week. Intel sold US$20 billion of stock at US$95 a share; $Applied Optoelectronics(AAOI)$ launched a US$600 million at-the-market programme; and $NEBIUS(NBIS)$ completed US$5 billion of convertible notes against a revenue base of only about US$1.4 billion.

The mechanism is identical in all four: take tomorrow's money while the valuation is still high, and pay for it in dilution today.

$Intel(INTC)$has already shown what that payment looks like. It closed down 2.24 per cent on Friday at US$90.07, back below the US$95 placement price — the institutions that took that stock are now underwater.

Alibaba's reaction arrived immediately. The US line fell another 4.80 per cent after hours, the Hong Kong line is down 10.08 per cent today, and $Tencent Holding Ltd.(TCEHY)$ is down 3.72 per cent with Xiaomi down 4.41 per cent. The same money has to free up room to take the placement, and the whole Hong Kong tech complex gets drained with it.

One distinction matters: Alibaba's 8.57 per cent fall on Friday was not the placement. It was the results — earnings per share about 15.85 per cent short of expectations, with GAAP net profit down about 75 per cent year on year. The placement, priced on Sunday, was the second blow.

The small caps take it hardest. $Applied Optoelectronics(AAOI)$ closed down 3.32 per cent on Friday and fell another 11.79 per cent after hours. An at-the-market programme sells into whatever bid exists, which puts a running ceiling over the price.

Somebody left before the placement. Michael Burry said he had sold $Alibaba(BABA)$ on valuation, and built a large position in JD.com instead.

There is only one test that separates these four: can the money turn into recognisable revenue within two or three quarters. Alibaba has cloud to point at — external commercial cloud revenue grew 45 per cent last quarter, a 22-quarter high. Intel needs foundry customers. AAOI needs orders in co-packaged optics and AI interconnect.

The second source of money is charging customers more.

Bloomberg reports that Nvidia has notified customers that AI servers built on its chips will rise in price by more than 15 per cent, with another report putting it as high as 17 per cent, because memory costs are climbing.

This is the fourth stop on that bill. Contract prices bit handset margins first — Xiaomi's second-quarter net profit fell 42.6 per cent. Then they lifted GPU prices, with Intel's jumping 48 per cent. Now it is AI servers. The people buying compute pay at the end of the line.

Raising prices protects Nvidia's own margin and lifts its customers' capital expenditure bill. It reports after Wednesday's close, and this is the most contradictory line in that report.

Memory itself paused on Friday: $SanDisk Corp.(SNDK)$ closed down 0.28 per cent, $Micron Technology(MU)$ 0.77 per cent, $SK hynix(SKHY)$ up just 0.20 per cent, and $Direxion Daily Semiconductors Bull 3x Shares(SOXL)$ down 1.32 per cent.

What held them down was something counter-intuitive. Samsung said it would return up to 110 trillion won to shareholders in 2026, about US$79 billion and roughly half of free cash flow — the largest return commitment in Korean corporate history. Reuters headlined it "record shareholder return disappoints the market". Samsung is down 6.84 per cent in Korea today.

At the rumour stage the market had heard "more than 100 trillion". Set against the cash flow it generates, the figure that landed was not startling. The moment the promise was confirmed became the moment to sell.

There is a new number on the macro side: US government debt formally passed US$40 trillion in August, moving from "approaching" to "past". The Treasury has taken each long-dated buyback up to at least US$4 billion, which deals with liquidity rather than the deficit or the term premium.

Where the money went is plain enough. Spot gold is up 0.87 per cent today at US$4,647, having cleared US$4,600 intraday, its highest since mid-May.

The US side moved first on Friday: $SPDR Gold ETF(GLD)$ closed up 1.95 per cent, $iShares Silver Trust(SLV)$ 1.72 per cent and $VanEck Gold Miners ETF(GDX)$ 2.98 per cent, with $Newmont Mining(NEM)$ up 3.09 per cent; in Hong Kong today Zhaojin Mining is up 2.98 per cent.

Bridgewater's founder Ray Dalio put it more bluntly: he warned that US public finances have reached a turning point and a debt crisis could arrive within the next few years, advising investors to cut their allocation to debt assets, put 10 to 15 per cent into gold, and hold a small amount of bitcoin.

The other side deserves saying too: gold set an all-time high of US$5,608 in January, so this level is still filling a hole rather than making new highs.

The other leg of the same logic went the other way today. Bitcoin fell 0.91 per cent to US$77,069, while Strategy closed up 6.10 per cent on Friday, with reports noting that Michael Saylor's bitcoin bet has only just come back above cost — even as he tells shareholders to be ready for "a few difficult years".

$Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ closed up 5.14 per cent on Friday, on regulation rather than product: Nevada and Las Vegas issued robotaxi operating permits, with the state clearing an allowance of up to 5,000 vehicles at once, alongside Waymo and Uber.

The same day it recalled nearly three million electric vehicles in China, because a concealed emergency door handle could leave occupants trapped — its largest recall in the country. The shares rose more than 5 per cent anyway.

$Moderna, Inc.(MRNA)$closed up 8.86 per cent on Friday at US$145.13, and only all three days together make sense: a large part of the first day's 176.97 per cent was a squeeze, the second day's 23.55 per cent fall was profit-taking once the forced buying was done, and this third-day 8.86 per cent is closer to a real disagreement, because the buyers this time were not being squeezed out of a position.

Three things collide this week. $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ reports after Wednesday's close, having closed down 0.98 per cent on Friday at the end of its longest losing streak since 2022; Jackson Hole runs from 27 to 29 August with Warsh appearing as Fed chair for the first time; and July PCE lands in the same stretch. Marvell reports after Thursday's close, and it fell 5.57 per cent on Friday going in.

There are only two wallets an AI buildout can reach into: the market's and the customer's. After Friday, both had been opened — and of the four, the one that got its money first has already shown what it costs.

The above is personal analysis, not investment advice.

💬 【Talking Point】

$NVIDIA(NVDA)$ has told customers that AI servers on its chips will cost more than 15 per cent more, because memory prices are rising. That protects its own margin and raises its customers' capital expenditure. Would you rather own the one collecting, or the ones about to pay?

💰 【Bounty】

Drop your view in the comments and there are coins in it for you! 🎁

🔔 Better shared than saved — tag a friend and split the coins!

Alibaba Hit Twice — Down 8.6%, Then HK$80 Billion Drained. Are These the Same Story?
Alibaba took two hits with different causes. Earnings first: adjusted net profit −38%, GAAP −75%, the U.S. listing down 8.57%, with JPMorgan still Overweight at a $210 target. Then dilution: an HK$80bn (~$10.2bn) placement outside the U.S. on August 23, its first since the 2019 HK listing, proceeds all to AI. Hong Kong shares fell 10.08% intraday, Tencent −3.72%, Xiaomi −4.41% as funds sold to make room. Against capex +75% and cloud revenue +45%, the dividing line is whether that HK$80bn becomes cloud revenue or depreciation. Buy the dip, or rotate to Tencent, which is not diluting?
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
Reward 500 Tiger-coinsDeadline to 09/03 16:27
The originator will select the best recovery and allocate Tiger coins before the reward ends
Reward-post

Comments

  • 苏36
    08-24 16:55
    苏36
    Own the Toll Collector, Not the Toll Payer

    I’d rather own Nvidia than the companies paying the higher AI bill—but only if its pricing power proves sustainable. Rising memory costs are turning AI infrastructure into a margin test: Nvidia can pass costs downstream, while server builders and cloud providers face heavier capex.

    The bigger question is whether AI demand remains strong enough to absorb those increases. If customers keep spending aggressively, Nvidia’s pricing power strengthens. If budgets tighten, higher server costs could eventually slow deployments.

    So for me, Nvidia remains the “toll collector,” but valuation matters. I’d rather buy on meaningful pullbacks than chase strength ahead of earnings.

    @Marktomarket [微笑]

  • Investing Leon
    08-24 20:42
    Investing Leon
    The main problem is that many companies are struggling to turn their spending into actual revenue, and that’s a serious concern.
  • PeteLeacock
    08-24 17:53
    PeteLeacock
    The collector. Big tech can still lean on cash piles and internal investment arms first, so which funding channel tightens fastest?
Leave a comment
3