Lofter personal page - To The Moon

Lofter

Lofter

No personal profile

25Follow

0Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-07-15

Nice

Cramer: Chip Sector's Contradictions – AMD, Nvidia, Intel

2021-06-30

$Paysafe Ltd(PSFE)$when ????

2021-07-13

Good

The Fed's Complete Taper Timeline

2021-07-15

$DiDi Global Inc.(DIDI)$didididi

2021-07-13

Gogogo

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-04-23

$RIVERSTONE HOLDINGS LIMITED(AP4.SI)$gogo

2021-07-13

$Gevo(GEVO)$when will you ever return?

2021-04-22

$Platinum Group Metals(PLG)$Gogogo

2021-07-13

Nice

Conagra Shares Fall After Downbeat FY22 Outlook

2021-07-13

Nice

Sorry, the original content has been removed

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3569409987151691","uuid":"3569409987151691","gmtCreate":1606316346235,"gmtModify":1623749189126,"name":"Lofter","pinyin":"lofter","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":0,"headSize":25,"tweetSize":0,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.10.15","exceedPercentage":"93.16%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.01.03","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"93.31%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.10.15","exceedPercentage":"93.15%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":144709047,"gmtCreate":1626312702289,"gmtModify":1703757625563,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gogogo","listText":"Gogogo","text":"Gogogo","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4e8681003353ab2fd4795fc47c1c6d3d","width":"1080","height":"3071"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/144709047","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1769,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":144700914,"gmtCreate":1626312669338,"gmtModify":1703757624585,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIDI\">$DiDi Global Inc.(DIDI)$</a>didididi","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIDI\">$DiDi Global Inc.(DIDI)$</a>didididi","text":"$DiDi Global Inc.(DIDI)$didididi","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c9e2db4e8a647e8b04e4119635122a0","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/144700914","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2862,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":144474595,"gmtCreate":1626312603717,"gmtModify":1703757624423,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/144474595","repostId":"1181685430","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1181685430","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626311578,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1181685430?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-15 09:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cramer: Chip Sector's Contradictions – AMD, Nvidia, Intel","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1181685430","media":"The Street","summary":"With the chip shortage, these stocks are making investors nervous, but keep them on your radar, Cram","content":"<blockquote>\n With the chip shortage, these stocks are making investors nervous, but keep them on your radar, Cramer says.\n</blockquote>\n<p>The semiconductor industry is a “ball of confusion” to investors, just when market mavens crave some stability from chip makers.</p>\n<p>That’s causing angst among investors, who should be buying semiconductors right now but can’t—or won’t—pull the trigger, TheStreet's Jim Cramer noted in a recent Real Money column.</p>\n<p>One big chip maker stands out in that regard, Cramer said.</p>\n<p>\"Take Advanced Micro&nbsp;(<b>AMD</b>) -Get Report. This one has wandered in the wilderness for months as Intel's&nbsp;(<b>INTC</b>) -Get Report&nbsp;CEO Pat Gelsinger talks a big game about ending the reign of the upstart. It doesn't matter that CEO Lisa Su has a monster lead on Intel now. Pat loves to say that Intel's back and we want that. The fact is, though, that AMD is still the leader and Su is not going to fight back with words, she is going to fight back with chips.</p>\n<p>\"Su did give an interview this week where she talked about how well they were doing and acknowledged the chip shortage. I thought the stock should go up on the story and instead it got hammered. Finally we are getting nervous about the Xilinx approval. We have been waiting and waiting.&nbsp;All that amounts to a stalled stock with a downward bias.\"</p>\n<p>Cramer also pointed to Texas Instruments&nbsp;(<b>TXN</b>) -Get Report&nbsp;and Analog Devices&nbsp;(<b>ADI</b>) -Get Report&nbsp;as two additional industry culprits who should represent buying opportunities, but are too “harrowing” to be bought right now. Other semiconductor stocks are in the same state of suspension, but should also be on investor radar screens.</p>\n<p>This from Cramer:</p>\n<p>I can't tell you how many times I have heard that Broadcom&nbsp;(<b>AVGO</b>) -Get Report&nbsp;will disappoint only to watch it beat the numbers handily.&nbsp;Or Marvell Tech&nbsp;(<b>MRVL</b>) -Get Report. Here's one that likes to run into the quarter and then sell down when it reports.</p>\n<p>Cramer said that, fortunately, Marvell didn't fall flat this time but that's the first time he's seen it hold.&nbsp;The only one that doesn't act terribly, he added, is Nvidia&nbsp;(<b>NVDA</b>) -Get Report&nbsp;-- \"but need I remind you that it was stalled for ages, too.\"</p>\n<p>It’s worth noting that a semiconductor’s natural state is to rise up as its temperature goes up. That’s not happening right now and it’s vexing to investors who otherwise may be sector buyers, Cramer noted. Still, the upside value shouldn’t be ignored, he added.</p>\n<p>\"This fabulous group is a ball of confusion until you look where they come from,\" Cramer says.</p>","source":"lsy1610613172068","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cramer: Chip Sector's Contradictions – AMD, Nvidia, Intel</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCramer: Chip Sector's Contradictions – AMD, Nvidia, Intel\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-15 09:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/jim-cramer/cramer-chip-sectors-contradictions-amd-nvidia-intel><strong>The Street</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>With the chip shortage, these stocks are making investors nervous, but keep them on your radar, Cramer says.\n\nThe semiconductor industry is a “ball of confusion” to investors, just when market mavens ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/jim-cramer/cramer-chip-sectors-contradictions-amd-nvidia-intel\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMD":"美国超微公司","NVDA":"英伟达","INTC":"英特尔"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/jim-cramer/cramer-chip-sectors-contradictions-amd-nvidia-intel","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1181685430","content_text":"With the chip shortage, these stocks are making investors nervous, but keep them on your radar, Cramer says.\n\nThe semiconductor industry is a “ball of confusion” to investors, just when market mavens crave some stability from chip makers.\nThat’s causing angst among investors, who should be buying semiconductors right now but can’t—or won’t—pull the trigger, TheStreet's Jim Cramer noted in a recent Real Money column.\nOne big chip maker stands out in that regard, Cramer said.\n\"Take Advanced Micro (AMD) -Get Report. This one has wandered in the wilderness for months as Intel's (INTC) -Get Report CEO Pat Gelsinger talks a big game about ending the reign of the upstart. It doesn't matter that CEO Lisa Su has a monster lead on Intel now. Pat loves to say that Intel's back and we want that. The fact is, though, that AMD is still the leader and Su is not going to fight back with words, she is going to fight back with chips.\n\"Su did give an interview this week where she talked about how well they were doing and acknowledged the chip shortage. I thought the stock should go up on the story and instead it got hammered. Finally we are getting nervous about the Xilinx approval. We have been waiting and waiting. All that amounts to a stalled stock with a downward bias.\"\nCramer also pointed to Texas Instruments (TXN) -Get Report and Analog Devices (ADI) -Get Report as two additional industry culprits who should represent buying opportunities, but are too “harrowing” to be bought right now. Other semiconductor stocks are in the same state of suspension, but should also be on investor radar screens.\nThis from Cramer:\nI can't tell you how many times I have heard that Broadcom (AVGO) -Get Report will disappoint only to watch it beat the numbers handily. Or Marvell Tech (MRVL) -Get Report. Here's one that likes to run into the quarter and then sell down when it reports.\nCramer said that, fortunately, Marvell didn't fall flat this time but that's the first time he's seen it hold. The only one that doesn't act terribly, he added, is Nvidia (NVDA) -Get Report -- \"but need I remind you that it was stalled for ages, too.\"\nIt’s worth noting that a semiconductor’s natural state is to rise up as its temperature goes up. That’s not happening right now and it’s vexing to investors who otherwise may be sector buyers, Cramer noted. Still, the upside value shouldn’t be ignored, he added.\n\"This fabulous group is a ball of confusion until you look where they come from,\" Cramer says.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NVDA":0.9,"INTC":0.9,"AMD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2756,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":145343675,"gmtCreate":1626191799597,"gmtModify":1703755324285,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/145343675","repostId":"2151699115","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2151699115","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1626188420,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2151699115?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-13 23:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Conagra Shares Fall After Downbeat FY22 Outlook","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2151699115","media":"Benzinga","summary":"\n","content":"<ul>\n <li>Consumer packaged goods company <b>Conagra Brands Inc </b>(NYSE:CAG) reported fourth quarter FY21 sales of $2.73 billion, a 16.68% fall year-on-year, beating the consensus of $2.71 billion.</li>\n <li>Grocery &amp; Snacks segment sales fell 26.4% Y/Y to&nbsp;$1.1 billion and Refrigerated &amp; Frozen segment sales decreased 12.0% Y/Y to&nbsp;$1.2 billion.</li>\n <li>Adjusted gross profit fell 22.4% to&nbsp;$721 million.</li>\n <li>Adjusted gross margin decreased 194 basis points Y/Y to 26.3%.</li>\n <li>Adjusted operating margin decreased 311 basis points Y/Y to 14.0%.</li>\n <li>The company reported $263 million in adjusted selling, general, and administrative expense, a 14.7% decrease Y/Y.</li>\n <li>Adjusted EBITDA of $520 million fell 24.6% Y/Y.</li>\n <li>Adjusted EPS of $0.54 beat the consensus of $0.52.</li>\n <li>Cash and equivalents totaled $79.2 billion as of May 30, 2021.</li>\n <li><b>Outlook</b>: Conagra Brands<b> </b>has cut its FY22 Adjusted EPS guidance to ~$2.50 from the prior outlook of $2.63-$2.73, versus the consensus of $2.63.</li>\n <li>Organic net sales growth outlook is now expected to be flat, versus the prior growth expectation of 1% to 2%.</li>\n <li>Adjusted operating margin is expected to be approximately&nbsp;16%, versus prior outlook of 18% to 19%.</li>\n <li>\"As the fourth quarter unfolded, input cost inflation accelerated and we now expect fiscal 2022 input cost inflation to be materially higher than we anticipated at the end of fiscal Q3,” said CEO Sean Connolly.</li>\n <li><b>Price action:</b> CAG shares are trading lower by 4.91% at $34.76&nbsp;in premarket on the last check Tuesday.</li>\n</ul>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Conagra Shares Fall After Downbeat FY22 Outlook</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConagra Shares Fall After Downbeat FY22 Outlook\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-13 23:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<ul>\n <li>Consumer packaged goods company <b>Conagra Brands Inc </b>(NYSE:CAG) reported fourth quarter FY21 sales of $2.73 billion, a 16.68% fall year-on-year, beating the consensus of $2.71 billion.</li>\n <li>Grocery &amp; Snacks segment sales fell 26.4% Y/Y to&nbsp;$1.1 billion and Refrigerated &amp; Frozen segment sales decreased 12.0% Y/Y to&nbsp;$1.2 billion.</li>\n <li>Adjusted gross profit fell 22.4% to&nbsp;$721 million.</li>\n <li>Adjusted gross margin decreased 194 basis points Y/Y to 26.3%.</li>\n <li>Adjusted operating margin decreased 311 basis points Y/Y to 14.0%.</li>\n <li>The company reported $263 million in adjusted selling, general, and administrative expense, a 14.7% decrease Y/Y.</li>\n <li>Adjusted EBITDA of $520 million fell 24.6% Y/Y.</li>\n <li>Adjusted EPS of $0.54 beat the consensus of $0.52.</li>\n <li>Cash and equivalents totaled $79.2 billion as of May 30, 2021.</li>\n <li><b>Outlook</b>: Conagra Brands<b> </b>has cut its FY22 Adjusted EPS guidance to ~$2.50 from the prior outlook of $2.63-$2.73, versus the consensus of $2.63.</li>\n <li>Organic net sales growth outlook is now expected to be flat, versus the prior growth expectation of 1% to 2%.</li>\n <li>Adjusted operating margin is expected to be approximately&nbsp;16%, versus prior outlook of 18% to 19%.</li>\n <li>\"As the fourth quarter unfolded, input cost inflation accelerated and we now expect fiscal 2022 input cost inflation to be materially higher than we anticipated at the end of fiscal Q3,” said CEO Sean Connolly.</li>\n <li><b>Price action:</b> CAG shares are trading lower by 4.91% at $34.76&nbsp;in premarket on the last check Tuesday.</li>\n</ul>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CAG":"康尼格拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2151699115","content_text":"Consumer packaged goods company Conagra Brands Inc (NYSE:CAG) reported fourth quarter FY21 sales of $2.73 billion, a 16.68% fall year-on-year, beating the consensus of $2.71 billion.\nGrocery & Snacks segment sales fell 26.4% Y/Y to $1.1 billion and Refrigerated & Frozen segment sales decreased 12.0% Y/Y to $1.2 billion.\nAdjusted gross profit fell 22.4% to $721 million.\nAdjusted gross margin decreased 194 basis points Y/Y to 26.3%.\nAdjusted operating margin decreased 311 basis points Y/Y to 14.0%.\nThe company reported $263 million in adjusted selling, general, and administrative expense, a 14.7% decrease Y/Y.\nAdjusted EBITDA of $520 million fell 24.6% Y/Y.\nAdjusted EPS of $0.54 beat the consensus of $0.52.\nCash and equivalents totaled $79.2 billion as of May 30, 2021.\nOutlook: Conagra Brands has cut its FY22 Adjusted EPS guidance to ~$2.50 from the prior outlook of $2.63-$2.73, versus the consensus of $2.63.\nOrganic net sales growth outlook is now expected to be flat, versus the prior growth expectation of 1% to 2%.\nAdjusted operating margin is expected to be approximately 16%, versus prior outlook of 18% to 19%.\n\"As the fourth quarter unfolded, input cost inflation accelerated and we now expect fiscal 2022 input cost inflation to be materially higher than we anticipated at the end of fiscal Q3,” said CEO Sean Connolly.\nPrice action: CAG shares are trading lower by 4.91% at $34.76 in premarket on the last check Tuesday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"CAG":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2115,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":145349596,"gmtCreate":1626191746315,"gmtModify":1703755322980,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/145349596","repostId":"2151156669","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1989,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":142102107,"gmtCreate":1626135065709,"gmtModify":1703753931354,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/142102107","repostId":"1144812338","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1144812338","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626134605,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1144812338?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-13 08:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Fed's Complete Taper Timeline","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1144812338","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Commenting on the Fed's recent communications debacle, Bank of America economist Michelle Meyer writ","content":"<p>Commenting on the Fed's recent communications debacle, Bank of America economist Michelle Meyer writes that the Fed was getting high marks for its communication \"up until the last meeting where the message got jumbled.\" Specifically, in light of the stunned market reaction following the last meeting, many commentators declared that the Fed had abandoned Flexible Average Inflation Targeting (FAIT), which Meyer strongly disagree with, conceding that while a growing number of Fed officials have become uncomfortable with rising inflation and are looking to remove accommodation faster, the reality is that Chair Powell and the majority of the Committee have not given up on FAIT. Indeed, Meyer notes, \"the gut reaction of the markets pulling forward rates hikes to 4Q 22 following the last meeting proved fleeting as the market has subsequently pushed out the first hike back to 1Q23.\"</p>\n<p>To help navigate the Fed's communication error, Meyer provides a guide for understanding the Fed’s (latest) reaction function and communication.</p>\n<p><b>First, the Taper</b></p>\n<p>Here Chair Powell has been crystal clear: the Fed will slowly guide the markets toward the taper. BofA shows the taper timeline in the chart below, with its expectations overlaid.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3d762173d94ce966d288af0927ed478c\" tg-width=\"1205\" tg-height=\"359\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>While Meyer concedes that it is possible for the Fed to signal tapering at the upcoming meeting in July, the BofA economist remain doubtful.<b>The reason to wait is that the market isn’t pricing in the announcement at this meeting, and the Fed wouldn’t want to risk surprising the market.</b>In the last meeting, Powell stated that taper was still “a ways away”. But on the other hand, they have been providing hints that an earlier move is possible, and the surprise will be minimal. Financial conditions are also very accommodative with yields significantly lower making it less painful if rates reset higher upon a taper announcement. Combining these two, BofA thinks it is much more likely that they signal in September.</p>\n<p>There is also a risk of the Fed pulling forward the actual taper from BofA's current forecast of January to perhaps December or even November.<b>This depends on how much quantitative guidance the Fed offers along with the taper signal.</b>According to Meyer, if the Fed is clear that they want to see a certain amount of job creation in order to taper - such as a range for the employment-to-population ratio or progress on the jobs deficit - it will be easier to wait to execute taper. Another option would be to offer calendar guidance but this seems to run counter to Powell’s desire for policy to be “outcome based” rather than “outlook based.” If the Fed keeps the language vague arguing for “substantial further progress”, it seems to leave options open.</p>\n<p><b>What about hikes</b></p>\n<p>The Fed laid out the criteria to hike rates as three-fold:</p>\n<ol>\n <li><b>inflation needs to reach 2% and stay there for a year;</b></li>\n <li><b>conditions be met to believe that inflation can run moderately above 2% allowing for the overshoot to offset the undershoot;</b></li>\n <li><b>maximum employment to be met with broad-based labor market recovery.</b></li>\n</ol>\n<p>The first has been satisfied. We are on the way to meeting the second, although doubts remain - especially among the FOMC - given the potential transitory nature of inflation. The third criteria hasn’t been satisfied and also a likely needed for the second to be met.</p>\n<p>The challenge, as Meyer explains, with declaring victory on the inflation overshoot is that we are vulnerable to inflation falling back below the target – at least temporarily – next year. For simplicity, let’s focus on the biggest source of transitory inflation: vehicles (defined here as used cars and trucks, rental cars and new vehicles). This makes up around 5% of core PCE. Over the last two months, about 40bp of the 1.2% gain in core PCE owed to these categories. To put this into perspective, if these categories were unchanged, core PCE would have been 0.48% mom in April (2.9% yoy) and 0.31% in May (3.0% yoy). For illustrative purposes, BofA also ran scenarios for %yoy core PCE inflation through next year based on the following paths for car prices: full mean reversion to preCOVID levels, 50% reversal and 25% reversal, assuming trend core inflation of 2.0% in all other categories. This would lead to core PCE of 1.3%, 1.6%, and 1.8%, respectively, as shown on the chart below.<b>This shows the sensitivity of inflation to a singular volatile category.</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a4c7e3244a3f667a109b3b32257842ff\" tg-width=\"614\" tg-height=\"510\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>The path toward maximum employment is also uncertain for two reasons:</p>\n<ol>\n <li>it is unclear how much of the decline in the labor force will prove permanent; and</li>\n <li>the Fed has changed the definition of maximum employment.</li>\n</ol>\n<p>For the former, BofA has previously estimated that the vast majority of those that dropped out of the labor force will be able to return with about half of the decline likely directly attributable to the pandemic. However,<b>about 1.2 million reflects earlier retirement which is unlikely reversible.</b>This will make it more challenging to fully recover the employment-to-population ratio (EPOP). Perhaps a work-around is to look for the prime-working age EPOP to<b>return to pre-pandemic levels which can be achieved by March 2022 based on BofA's employment forecasts which currently is looking for a cumulative 5.9mn jobs to be created by 1Q 2022</b>.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4f782420c64c9d0bcc2f0472be6c6f43\" tg-width=\"581\" tg-height=\"510\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>The other consideration mentioned by BofA,<b>is that the Fed has changed its definition for maximum employment to be broad-based and \"inclusive.\"</b>This means that the recovery in the EPOP has to be felt throughout the population particularly for the most economically challenged cohort, i.e.,<b>no hikes until there is a surge in black employment</b>. To achieve this, it will require an even tighter labor market where the “fringe” of the labor market is offered greater opportunities. This in particular calls for the prime-age EPOP to exceed pre-pandemic levels, further pushing out when the Fed might declare victory. And since it is the minority workers who have repeatedly stated they will not return to the labor force unless they get far more preferential terms,<b>it is almost as if the Fed has engineered the current reaction function to one where it will continue to ease indefinitely and blame lack of \"recovery\" on black jobs for its refusal to stop the easing, as if injecting $120BN per month will somehow result in more black workers getting hired!</b></p>\n<p><b>The Committee: divided</b></p>\n<p>Last but not least, there is a growing divide on the Committee which complicates forward guidance. As of the June meeting there were 7 FOMC officials who expected hikes to start in 2022. According to BofA,<b>all of these officials are regional Fed Presidents</b>, some of whom have never fully embraced FAIT (below is Bloomberg's assumption of who is who on the dot plot).</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d638c3c8a49237058a24159586030dba\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"690\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>And so, with the economy running strong and inflation pressures building – at least on the surface – these Fed officials are getting ready to remove accommodation. As BofA notes, this makes sense....<b>if you are still operating in the old regime:</b>remember that the Fed hiked rates for the first time with core PCE inflation well below target. The view was that it was preferable to slowly normalize policy based on expectations of future inflation and growth to avoid having to hike quickly and destabilize the recovery. Hence the challenge with keeping the new framework “flexible”. BofA believes the “core” of the Committee –<i><b>Powell, Brainard and Clarida</b></i>– are much more influential in setting the course for policy. The Board of Governors and NY Fed President Williams will generally be in agreement. It is this group that is still strongly committed to FAIT with more than a token overshoot of the 2% target, preferring to err on the side of too much rather than too little inflation. Moreover, they might not be as concerned about higher inflation: indeed, the Board staff forecast shows a slower trajectory for inflation based on the latest FOMC minutes. The Committee members’ voices will be heard and can influence the decisions of the FOMC with the force of their arguments. As such, Meyer's advice is to pay more attention to the centrist members of the FOMC – such as Bostic and Harker – whose arguments could resonate with the Board.</p>\n<p><b>Finally, markets, where we have seen a big moves in rates</b></p>\n<p>The bond market has had a significant rally; at 1.30% the 10-year is back to mid-February levels. In fact, the curve has also flattened significantly in a way that typically doesn’t happen until the hiking cycle has started. So what gives? According to BofA's in house rates expert, Mark Cabana, the move is partly technical, driven by investors closing out short positions and trend-following hedge funds exacerbating rate moves. But it could also reflect the market becoming increasingly worried about structurally lower growth and inflation once the cyclical lift fades. It may also be that the market is doubting the Fed’s resolve to overheat the economy and facilitate higher inflation. For what it's worth, Meyer says that while the former is a reasonable argument, she strongly disagrees with the argument that the Fed has already blinked. That's because Powell has been setting the stage for this new framework even before the pandemic - which was a welcome catalyst to implement FAIT - and sees this as a chance to reset monetary policy.</p>\n<p>In short: expect the flood of liquidity to continue for a long, long time.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Fed's Complete Taper Timeline</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Fed's Complete Taper Timeline\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-13 08:03 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/feds-complete-taper-timeline><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Commenting on the Fed's recent communications debacle, Bank of America economist Michelle Meyer writes that the Fed was getting high marks for its communication \"up until the last meeting where the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/feds-complete-taper-timeline\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/feds-complete-taper-timeline","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1144812338","content_text":"Commenting on the Fed's recent communications debacle, Bank of America economist Michelle Meyer writes that the Fed was getting high marks for its communication \"up until the last meeting where the message got jumbled.\" Specifically, in light of the stunned market reaction following the last meeting, many commentators declared that the Fed had abandoned Flexible Average Inflation Targeting (FAIT), which Meyer strongly disagree with, conceding that while a growing number of Fed officials have become uncomfortable with rising inflation and are looking to remove accommodation faster, the reality is that Chair Powell and the majority of the Committee have not given up on FAIT. Indeed, Meyer notes, \"the gut reaction of the markets pulling forward rates hikes to 4Q 22 following the last meeting proved fleeting as the market has subsequently pushed out the first hike back to 1Q23.\"\nTo help navigate the Fed's communication error, Meyer provides a guide for understanding the Fed’s (latest) reaction function and communication.\nFirst, the Taper\nHere Chair Powell has been crystal clear: the Fed will slowly guide the markets toward the taper. BofA shows the taper timeline in the chart below, with its expectations overlaid.\n\nWhile Meyer concedes that it is possible for the Fed to signal tapering at the upcoming meeting in July, the BofA economist remain doubtful.The reason to wait is that the market isn’t pricing in the announcement at this meeting, and the Fed wouldn’t want to risk surprising the market.In the last meeting, Powell stated that taper was still “a ways away”. But on the other hand, they have been providing hints that an earlier move is possible, and the surprise will be minimal. Financial conditions are also very accommodative with yields significantly lower making it less painful if rates reset higher upon a taper announcement. Combining these two, BofA thinks it is much more likely that they signal in September.\nThere is also a risk of the Fed pulling forward the actual taper from BofA's current forecast of January to perhaps December or even November.This depends on how much quantitative guidance the Fed offers along with the taper signal.According to Meyer, if the Fed is clear that they want to see a certain amount of job creation in order to taper - such as a range for the employment-to-population ratio or progress on the jobs deficit - it will be easier to wait to execute taper. Another option would be to offer calendar guidance but this seems to run counter to Powell’s desire for policy to be “outcome based” rather than “outlook based.” If the Fed keeps the language vague arguing for “substantial further progress”, it seems to leave options open.\nWhat about hikes\nThe Fed laid out the criteria to hike rates as three-fold:\n\ninflation needs to reach 2% and stay there for a year;\nconditions be met to believe that inflation can run moderately above 2% allowing for the overshoot to offset the undershoot;\nmaximum employment to be met with broad-based labor market recovery.\n\nThe first has been satisfied. We are on the way to meeting the second, although doubts remain - especially among the FOMC - given the potential transitory nature of inflation. The third criteria hasn’t been satisfied and also a likely needed for the second to be met.\nThe challenge, as Meyer explains, with declaring victory on the inflation overshoot is that we are vulnerable to inflation falling back below the target – at least temporarily – next year. For simplicity, let’s focus on the biggest source of transitory inflation: vehicles (defined here as used cars and trucks, rental cars and new vehicles). This makes up around 5% of core PCE. Over the last two months, about 40bp of the 1.2% gain in core PCE owed to these categories. To put this into perspective, if these categories were unchanged, core PCE would have been 0.48% mom in April (2.9% yoy) and 0.31% in May (3.0% yoy). For illustrative purposes, BofA also ran scenarios for %yoy core PCE inflation through next year based on the following paths for car prices: full mean reversion to preCOVID levels, 50% reversal and 25% reversal, assuming trend core inflation of 2.0% in all other categories. This would lead to core PCE of 1.3%, 1.6%, and 1.8%, respectively, as shown on the chart below.This shows the sensitivity of inflation to a singular volatile category.\n\nThe path toward maximum employment is also uncertain for two reasons:\n\nit is unclear how much of the decline in the labor force will prove permanent; and\nthe Fed has changed the definition of maximum employment.\n\nFor the former, BofA has previously estimated that the vast majority of those that dropped out of the labor force will be able to return with about half of the decline likely directly attributable to the pandemic. However,about 1.2 million reflects earlier retirement which is unlikely reversible.This will make it more challenging to fully recover the employment-to-population ratio (EPOP). Perhaps a work-around is to look for the prime-working age EPOP toreturn to pre-pandemic levels which can be achieved by March 2022 based on BofA's employment forecasts which currently is looking for a cumulative 5.9mn jobs to be created by 1Q 2022.\n\nThe other consideration mentioned by BofA,is that the Fed has changed its definition for maximum employment to be broad-based and \"inclusive.\"This means that the recovery in the EPOP has to be felt throughout the population particularly for the most economically challenged cohort, i.e.,no hikes until there is a surge in black employment. To achieve this, it will require an even tighter labor market where the “fringe” of the labor market is offered greater opportunities. This in particular calls for the prime-age EPOP to exceed pre-pandemic levels, further pushing out when the Fed might declare victory. And since it is the minority workers who have repeatedly stated they will not return to the labor force unless they get far more preferential terms,it is almost as if the Fed has engineered the current reaction function to one where it will continue to ease indefinitely and blame lack of \"recovery\" on black jobs for its refusal to stop the easing, as if injecting $120BN per month will somehow result in more black workers getting hired!\nThe Committee: divided\nLast but not least, there is a growing divide on the Committee which complicates forward guidance. As of the June meeting there were 7 FOMC officials who expected hikes to start in 2022. According to BofA,all of these officials are regional Fed Presidents, some of whom have never fully embraced FAIT (below is Bloomberg's assumption of who is who on the dot plot).\n\nAnd so, with the economy running strong and inflation pressures building – at least on the surface – these Fed officials are getting ready to remove accommodation. As BofA notes, this makes sense....if you are still operating in the old regime:remember that the Fed hiked rates for the first time with core PCE inflation well below target. The view was that it was preferable to slowly normalize policy based on expectations of future inflation and growth to avoid having to hike quickly and destabilize the recovery. Hence the challenge with keeping the new framework “flexible”. BofA believes the “core” of the Committee –Powell, Brainard and Clarida– are much more influential in setting the course for policy. The Board of Governors and NY Fed President Williams will generally be in agreement. It is this group that is still strongly committed to FAIT with more than a token overshoot of the 2% target, preferring to err on the side of too much rather than too little inflation. Moreover, they might not be as concerned about higher inflation: indeed, the Board staff forecast shows a slower trajectory for inflation based on the latest FOMC minutes. The Committee members’ voices will be heard and can influence the decisions of the FOMC with the force of their arguments. As such, Meyer's advice is to pay more attention to the centrist members of the FOMC – such as Bostic and Harker – whose arguments could resonate with the Board.\nFinally, markets, where we have seen a big moves in rates\nThe bond market has had a significant rally; at 1.30% the 10-year is back to mid-February levels. In fact, the curve has also flattened significantly in a way that typically doesn’t happen until the hiking cycle has started. So what gives? According to BofA's in house rates expert, Mark Cabana, the move is partly technical, driven by investors closing out short positions and trend-following hedge funds exacerbating rate moves. But it could also reflect the market becoming increasingly worried about structurally lower growth and inflation once the cyclical lift fades. It may also be that the market is doubting the Fed’s resolve to overheat the economy and facilitate higher inflation. For what it's worth, Meyer says that while the former is a reasonable argument, she strongly disagrees with the argument that the Fed has already blinked. That's because Powell has been setting the stage for this new framework even before the pandemic - which was a welcome catalyst to implement FAIT - and sees this as a chance to reset monetary policy.\nIn short: expect the flood of liquidity to continue for a long, long time.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1829,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":142108699,"gmtCreate":1626135030811,"gmtModify":1703753927759,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gogogo","listText":"Gogogo","text":"Gogogo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/142108699","repostId":"1160105017","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1962,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":142101838,"gmtCreate":1626134960424,"gmtModify":1703753928742,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GEVO\">$Gevo(GEVO)$</a>when will you ever return?","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GEVO\">$Gevo(GEVO)$</a>when will you ever return?","text":"$Gevo(GEVO)$when will you ever return?","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d9cc98d6b9ca17f247de68c3209bff9","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/142101838","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2467,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":142990878,"gmtCreate":1626110887294,"gmtModify":1703753653537,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DNN\">$Denison Mines(DNN)$</a>come onn...","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DNN\">$Denison Mines(DNN)$</a>come onn...","text":"$Denison Mines(DNN)$come onn...","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6ce32909b57bb179d6b7b44bc01a6b23","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/142990878","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1981,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":141821565,"gmtCreate":1625848356257,"gmtModify":1703749899650,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"!!!???","listText":"!!!???","text":"!!!???","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/feb1b16a60de038b2b19735422294f30","width":"1080","height":"2146"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/141821565","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1840,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":151347403,"gmtCreate":1625065509902,"gmtModify":1703735358897,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PSFE\">$Paysafe Ltd(PSFE)$</a>when ????","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PSFE\">$Paysafe Ltd(PSFE)$</a>when ????","text":"$Paysafe Ltd(PSFE)$when ????","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f41a6c7fc999bbf3cdb79890d073777","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/151347403","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":934,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":153046138,"gmtCreate":1624990950324,"gmtModify":1703849674902,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JD\">$JD.com(JD)$</a>lets go!","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/JD\">$JD.com(JD)$</a>lets go!","text":"$JD.com(JD)$lets go!","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c96d97f294df3363e73f090198b64ca5","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/153046138","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":663,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":168905977,"gmtCreate":1623945975599,"gmtModify":1703824372074,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Please go up","listText":"Please go up","text":"Please go up","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1755ae61e7b53863ae7ca416d1df52ba","width":"1080","height":"2679"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/168905977","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":846,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":187126326,"gmtCreate":1623747368065,"gmtModify":1704210258862,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PSFE\">$Paysafe Ltd(PSFE)$</a>why no go up","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PSFE\">$Paysafe Ltd(PSFE)$</a>why no go up","text":"$Paysafe Ltd(PSFE)$why no go up","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/22531f82560cb0c9db8d3d3623254e55","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/187126326","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":748,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":187165141,"gmtCreate":1623747176483,"gmtModify":1704210248025,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gogogo","listText":"Gogogo","text":"Gogogo","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/815d03cc5e796d1c60c482f7408d15d5","width":"1080","height":"2679"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/187165141","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":833,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":117020872,"gmtCreate":1623110785396,"gmtModify":1704196155421,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DNN\">$Denison Mines(DNN)$</a>lets go","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DNN\">$Denison Mines(DNN)$</a>lets go","text":"$Denison Mines(DNN)$lets go","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/912888922a98a0fff1460586e0d225d0","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/117020872","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":867,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":112356634,"gmtCreate":1622852830428,"gmtModify":1704192361303,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TIGR\">$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$</a>Up up here we go","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TIGR\">$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$</a>Up up here we go","text":"$Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$Up up here we go","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6a011620c92c45e8c3dca7bb062c9e7f","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/112356634","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":785,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":372999809,"gmtCreate":1619165705901,"gmtModify":1704720640637,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great!","listText":"Great!","text":"Great!","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/372999809","repostId":"2129235391","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":850,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":372904373,"gmtCreate":1619165607192,"gmtModify":1704720636921,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AP4.SI\">$RIVERSTONE HOLDINGS LIMITED(AP4.SI)$</a>gogo","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AP4.SI\">$RIVERSTONE HOLDINGS LIMITED(AP4.SI)$</a>gogo","text":"$RIVERSTONE HOLDINGS LIMITED(AP4.SI)$gogo","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba3abc6bc252731ed2b0ee22e713ed28","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/372904373","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":684,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":376947369,"gmtCreate":1619084580651,"gmtModify":1704719382297,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PLG\">$Platinum Group Metals(PLG)$</a>Gogogo","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PLG\">$Platinum Group Metals(PLG)$</a>Gogogo","text":"$Platinum Group Metals(PLG)$Gogogo","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2765c2caa338f36d961d1b991dfd293e","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/376947369","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1319,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":144474595,"gmtCreate":1626312603717,"gmtModify":1703757624423,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/144474595","repostId":"1181685430","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1181685430","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626311578,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1181685430?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-15 09:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cramer: Chip Sector's Contradictions – AMD, Nvidia, Intel","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1181685430","media":"The Street","summary":"With the chip shortage, these stocks are making investors nervous, but keep them on your radar, Cram","content":"<blockquote>\n With the chip shortage, these stocks are making investors nervous, but keep them on your radar, Cramer says.\n</blockquote>\n<p>The semiconductor industry is a “ball of confusion” to investors, just when market mavens crave some stability from chip makers.</p>\n<p>That’s causing angst among investors, who should be buying semiconductors right now but can’t—or won’t—pull the trigger, TheStreet's Jim Cramer noted in a recent Real Money column.</p>\n<p>One big chip maker stands out in that regard, Cramer said.</p>\n<p>\"Take Advanced Micro&nbsp;(<b>AMD</b>) -Get Report. This one has wandered in the wilderness for months as Intel's&nbsp;(<b>INTC</b>) -Get Report&nbsp;CEO Pat Gelsinger talks a big game about ending the reign of the upstart. It doesn't matter that CEO Lisa Su has a monster lead on Intel now. Pat loves to say that Intel's back and we want that. The fact is, though, that AMD is still the leader and Su is not going to fight back with words, she is going to fight back with chips.</p>\n<p>\"Su did give an interview this week where she talked about how well they were doing and acknowledged the chip shortage. I thought the stock should go up on the story and instead it got hammered. Finally we are getting nervous about the Xilinx approval. We have been waiting and waiting.&nbsp;All that amounts to a stalled stock with a downward bias.\"</p>\n<p>Cramer also pointed to Texas Instruments&nbsp;(<b>TXN</b>) -Get Report&nbsp;and Analog Devices&nbsp;(<b>ADI</b>) -Get Report&nbsp;as two additional industry culprits who should represent buying opportunities, but are too “harrowing” to be bought right now. Other semiconductor stocks are in the same state of suspension, but should also be on investor radar screens.</p>\n<p>This from Cramer:</p>\n<p>I can't tell you how many times I have heard that Broadcom&nbsp;(<b>AVGO</b>) -Get Report&nbsp;will disappoint only to watch it beat the numbers handily.&nbsp;Or Marvell Tech&nbsp;(<b>MRVL</b>) -Get Report. Here's one that likes to run into the quarter and then sell down when it reports.</p>\n<p>Cramer said that, fortunately, Marvell didn't fall flat this time but that's the first time he's seen it hold.&nbsp;The only one that doesn't act terribly, he added, is Nvidia&nbsp;(<b>NVDA</b>) -Get Report&nbsp;-- \"but need I remind you that it was stalled for ages, too.\"</p>\n<p>It’s worth noting that a semiconductor’s natural state is to rise up as its temperature goes up. That’s not happening right now and it’s vexing to investors who otherwise may be sector buyers, Cramer noted. Still, the upside value shouldn’t be ignored, he added.</p>\n<p>\"This fabulous group is a ball of confusion until you look where they come from,\" Cramer says.</p>","source":"lsy1610613172068","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cramer: Chip Sector's Contradictions – AMD, Nvidia, Intel</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCramer: Chip Sector's Contradictions – AMD, Nvidia, Intel\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-15 09:12 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.thestreet.com/jim-cramer/cramer-chip-sectors-contradictions-amd-nvidia-intel><strong>The Street</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>With the chip shortage, these stocks are making investors nervous, but keep them on your radar, Cramer says.\n\nThe semiconductor industry is a “ball of confusion” to investors, just when market mavens ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.thestreet.com/jim-cramer/cramer-chip-sectors-contradictions-amd-nvidia-intel\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMD":"美国超微公司","NVDA":"英伟达","INTC":"英特尔"},"source_url":"https://www.thestreet.com/jim-cramer/cramer-chip-sectors-contradictions-amd-nvidia-intel","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1181685430","content_text":"With the chip shortage, these stocks are making investors nervous, but keep them on your radar, Cramer says.\n\nThe semiconductor industry is a “ball of confusion” to investors, just when market mavens crave some stability from chip makers.\nThat’s causing angst among investors, who should be buying semiconductors right now but can’t—or won’t—pull the trigger, TheStreet's Jim Cramer noted in a recent Real Money column.\nOne big chip maker stands out in that regard, Cramer said.\n\"Take Advanced Micro (AMD) -Get Report. This one has wandered in the wilderness for months as Intel's (INTC) -Get Report CEO Pat Gelsinger talks a big game about ending the reign of the upstart. It doesn't matter that CEO Lisa Su has a monster lead on Intel now. Pat loves to say that Intel's back and we want that. The fact is, though, that AMD is still the leader and Su is not going to fight back with words, she is going to fight back with chips.\n\"Su did give an interview this week where she talked about how well they were doing and acknowledged the chip shortage. I thought the stock should go up on the story and instead it got hammered. Finally we are getting nervous about the Xilinx approval. We have been waiting and waiting. All that amounts to a stalled stock with a downward bias.\"\nCramer also pointed to Texas Instruments (TXN) -Get Report and Analog Devices (ADI) -Get Report as two additional industry culprits who should represent buying opportunities, but are too “harrowing” to be bought right now. Other semiconductor stocks are in the same state of suspension, but should also be on investor radar screens.\nThis from Cramer:\nI can't tell you how many times I have heard that Broadcom (AVGO) -Get Report will disappoint only to watch it beat the numbers handily. Or Marvell Tech (MRVL) -Get Report. Here's one that likes to run into the quarter and then sell down when it reports.\nCramer said that, fortunately, Marvell didn't fall flat this time but that's the first time he's seen it hold. The only one that doesn't act terribly, he added, is Nvidia (NVDA) -Get Report -- \"but need I remind you that it was stalled for ages, too.\"\nIt’s worth noting that a semiconductor’s natural state is to rise up as its temperature goes up. That’s not happening right now and it’s vexing to investors who otherwise may be sector buyers, Cramer noted. Still, the upside value shouldn’t be ignored, he added.\n\"This fabulous group is a ball of confusion until you look where they come from,\" Cramer says.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NVDA":0.9,"INTC":0.9,"AMD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2756,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":151347403,"gmtCreate":1625065509902,"gmtModify":1703735358897,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PSFE\">$Paysafe Ltd(PSFE)$</a>when ????","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PSFE\">$Paysafe Ltd(PSFE)$</a>when ????","text":"$Paysafe Ltd(PSFE)$when ????","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5f41a6c7fc999bbf3cdb79890d073777","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/151347403","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":934,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":142102107,"gmtCreate":1626135065709,"gmtModify":1703753931354,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/142102107","repostId":"1144812338","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1144812338","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1626134605,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1144812338?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-13 08:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Fed's Complete Taper Timeline","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1144812338","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Commenting on the Fed's recent communications debacle, Bank of America economist Michelle Meyer writ","content":"<p>Commenting on the Fed's recent communications debacle, Bank of America economist Michelle Meyer writes that the Fed was getting high marks for its communication \"up until the last meeting where the message got jumbled.\" Specifically, in light of the stunned market reaction following the last meeting, many commentators declared that the Fed had abandoned Flexible Average Inflation Targeting (FAIT), which Meyer strongly disagree with, conceding that while a growing number of Fed officials have become uncomfortable with rising inflation and are looking to remove accommodation faster, the reality is that Chair Powell and the majority of the Committee have not given up on FAIT. Indeed, Meyer notes, \"the gut reaction of the markets pulling forward rates hikes to 4Q 22 following the last meeting proved fleeting as the market has subsequently pushed out the first hike back to 1Q23.\"</p>\n<p>To help navigate the Fed's communication error, Meyer provides a guide for understanding the Fed’s (latest) reaction function and communication.</p>\n<p><b>First, the Taper</b></p>\n<p>Here Chair Powell has been crystal clear: the Fed will slowly guide the markets toward the taper. BofA shows the taper timeline in the chart below, with its expectations overlaid.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3d762173d94ce966d288af0927ed478c\" tg-width=\"1205\" tg-height=\"359\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>While Meyer concedes that it is possible for the Fed to signal tapering at the upcoming meeting in July, the BofA economist remain doubtful.<b>The reason to wait is that the market isn’t pricing in the announcement at this meeting, and the Fed wouldn’t want to risk surprising the market.</b>In the last meeting, Powell stated that taper was still “a ways away”. But on the other hand, they have been providing hints that an earlier move is possible, and the surprise will be minimal. Financial conditions are also very accommodative with yields significantly lower making it less painful if rates reset higher upon a taper announcement. Combining these two, BofA thinks it is much more likely that they signal in September.</p>\n<p>There is also a risk of the Fed pulling forward the actual taper from BofA's current forecast of January to perhaps December or even November.<b>This depends on how much quantitative guidance the Fed offers along with the taper signal.</b>According to Meyer, if the Fed is clear that they want to see a certain amount of job creation in order to taper - such as a range for the employment-to-population ratio or progress on the jobs deficit - it will be easier to wait to execute taper. Another option would be to offer calendar guidance but this seems to run counter to Powell’s desire for policy to be “outcome based” rather than “outlook based.” If the Fed keeps the language vague arguing for “substantial further progress”, it seems to leave options open.</p>\n<p><b>What about hikes</b></p>\n<p>The Fed laid out the criteria to hike rates as three-fold:</p>\n<ol>\n <li><b>inflation needs to reach 2% and stay there for a year;</b></li>\n <li><b>conditions be met to believe that inflation can run moderately above 2% allowing for the overshoot to offset the undershoot;</b></li>\n <li><b>maximum employment to be met with broad-based labor market recovery.</b></li>\n</ol>\n<p>The first has been satisfied. We are on the way to meeting the second, although doubts remain - especially among the FOMC - given the potential transitory nature of inflation. The third criteria hasn’t been satisfied and also a likely needed for the second to be met.</p>\n<p>The challenge, as Meyer explains, with declaring victory on the inflation overshoot is that we are vulnerable to inflation falling back below the target – at least temporarily – next year. For simplicity, let’s focus on the biggest source of transitory inflation: vehicles (defined here as used cars and trucks, rental cars and new vehicles). This makes up around 5% of core PCE. Over the last two months, about 40bp of the 1.2% gain in core PCE owed to these categories. To put this into perspective, if these categories were unchanged, core PCE would have been 0.48% mom in April (2.9% yoy) and 0.31% in May (3.0% yoy). For illustrative purposes, BofA also ran scenarios for %yoy core PCE inflation through next year based on the following paths for car prices: full mean reversion to preCOVID levels, 50% reversal and 25% reversal, assuming trend core inflation of 2.0% in all other categories. This would lead to core PCE of 1.3%, 1.6%, and 1.8%, respectively, as shown on the chart below.<b>This shows the sensitivity of inflation to a singular volatile category.</b></p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a4c7e3244a3f667a109b3b32257842ff\" tg-width=\"614\" tg-height=\"510\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>The path toward maximum employment is also uncertain for two reasons:</p>\n<ol>\n <li>it is unclear how much of the decline in the labor force will prove permanent; and</li>\n <li>the Fed has changed the definition of maximum employment.</li>\n</ol>\n<p>For the former, BofA has previously estimated that the vast majority of those that dropped out of the labor force will be able to return with about half of the decline likely directly attributable to the pandemic. However,<b>about 1.2 million reflects earlier retirement which is unlikely reversible.</b>This will make it more challenging to fully recover the employment-to-population ratio (EPOP). Perhaps a work-around is to look for the prime-working age EPOP to<b>return to pre-pandemic levels which can be achieved by March 2022 based on BofA's employment forecasts which currently is looking for a cumulative 5.9mn jobs to be created by 1Q 2022</b>.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4f782420c64c9d0bcc2f0472be6c6f43\" tg-width=\"581\" tg-height=\"510\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>The other consideration mentioned by BofA,<b>is that the Fed has changed its definition for maximum employment to be broad-based and \"inclusive.\"</b>This means that the recovery in the EPOP has to be felt throughout the population particularly for the most economically challenged cohort, i.e.,<b>no hikes until there is a surge in black employment</b>. To achieve this, it will require an even tighter labor market where the “fringe” of the labor market is offered greater opportunities. This in particular calls for the prime-age EPOP to exceed pre-pandemic levels, further pushing out when the Fed might declare victory. And since it is the minority workers who have repeatedly stated they will not return to the labor force unless they get far more preferential terms,<b>it is almost as if the Fed has engineered the current reaction function to one where it will continue to ease indefinitely and blame lack of \"recovery\" on black jobs for its refusal to stop the easing, as if injecting $120BN per month will somehow result in more black workers getting hired!</b></p>\n<p><b>The Committee: divided</b></p>\n<p>Last but not least, there is a growing divide on the Committee which complicates forward guidance. As of the June meeting there were 7 FOMC officials who expected hikes to start in 2022. According to BofA,<b>all of these officials are regional Fed Presidents</b>, some of whom have never fully embraced FAIT (below is Bloomberg's assumption of who is who on the dot plot).</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d638c3c8a49237058a24159586030dba\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"690\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p>And so, with the economy running strong and inflation pressures building – at least on the surface – these Fed officials are getting ready to remove accommodation. As BofA notes, this makes sense....<b>if you are still operating in the old regime:</b>remember that the Fed hiked rates for the first time with core PCE inflation well below target. The view was that it was preferable to slowly normalize policy based on expectations of future inflation and growth to avoid having to hike quickly and destabilize the recovery. Hence the challenge with keeping the new framework “flexible”. BofA believes the “core” of the Committee –<i><b>Powell, Brainard and Clarida</b></i>– are much more influential in setting the course for policy. The Board of Governors and NY Fed President Williams will generally be in agreement. It is this group that is still strongly committed to FAIT with more than a token overshoot of the 2% target, preferring to err on the side of too much rather than too little inflation. Moreover, they might not be as concerned about higher inflation: indeed, the Board staff forecast shows a slower trajectory for inflation based on the latest FOMC minutes. The Committee members’ voices will be heard and can influence the decisions of the FOMC with the force of their arguments. As such, Meyer's advice is to pay more attention to the centrist members of the FOMC – such as Bostic and Harker – whose arguments could resonate with the Board.</p>\n<p><b>Finally, markets, where we have seen a big moves in rates</b></p>\n<p>The bond market has had a significant rally; at 1.30% the 10-year is back to mid-February levels. In fact, the curve has also flattened significantly in a way that typically doesn’t happen until the hiking cycle has started. So what gives? According to BofA's in house rates expert, Mark Cabana, the move is partly technical, driven by investors closing out short positions and trend-following hedge funds exacerbating rate moves. But it could also reflect the market becoming increasingly worried about structurally lower growth and inflation once the cyclical lift fades. It may also be that the market is doubting the Fed’s resolve to overheat the economy and facilitate higher inflation. For what it's worth, Meyer says that while the former is a reasonable argument, she strongly disagrees with the argument that the Fed has already blinked. That's because Powell has been setting the stage for this new framework even before the pandemic - which was a welcome catalyst to implement FAIT - and sees this as a chance to reset monetary policy.</p>\n<p>In short: expect the flood of liquidity to continue for a long, long time.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Fed's Complete Taper Timeline</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Fed's Complete Taper Timeline\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-07-13 08:03 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/feds-complete-taper-timeline><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Commenting on the Fed's recent communications debacle, Bank of America economist Michelle Meyer writes that the Fed was getting high marks for its communication \"up until the last meeting where the ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/feds-complete-taper-timeline\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯","SPY":"标普500ETF",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/feds-complete-taper-timeline","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1144812338","content_text":"Commenting on the Fed's recent communications debacle, Bank of America economist Michelle Meyer writes that the Fed was getting high marks for its communication \"up until the last meeting where the message got jumbled.\" Specifically, in light of the stunned market reaction following the last meeting, many commentators declared that the Fed had abandoned Flexible Average Inflation Targeting (FAIT), which Meyer strongly disagree with, conceding that while a growing number of Fed officials have become uncomfortable with rising inflation and are looking to remove accommodation faster, the reality is that Chair Powell and the majority of the Committee have not given up on FAIT. Indeed, Meyer notes, \"the gut reaction of the markets pulling forward rates hikes to 4Q 22 following the last meeting proved fleeting as the market has subsequently pushed out the first hike back to 1Q23.\"\nTo help navigate the Fed's communication error, Meyer provides a guide for understanding the Fed’s (latest) reaction function and communication.\nFirst, the Taper\nHere Chair Powell has been crystal clear: the Fed will slowly guide the markets toward the taper. BofA shows the taper timeline in the chart below, with its expectations overlaid.\n\nWhile Meyer concedes that it is possible for the Fed to signal tapering at the upcoming meeting in July, the BofA economist remain doubtful.The reason to wait is that the market isn’t pricing in the announcement at this meeting, and the Fed wouldn’t want to risk surprising the market.In the last meeting, Powell stated that taper was still “a ways away”. But on the other hand, they have been providing hints that an earlier move is possible, and the surprise will be minimal. Financial conditions are also very accommodative with yields significantly lower making it less painful if rates reset higher upon a taper announcement. Combining these two, BofA thinks it is much more likely that they signal in September.\nThere is also a risk of the Fed pulling forward the actual taper from BofA's current forecast of January to perhaps December or even November.This depends on how much quantitative guidance the Fed offers along with the taper signal.According to Meyer, if the Fed is clear that they want to see a certain amount of job creation in order to taper - such as a range for the employment-to-population ratio or progress on the jobs deficit - it will be easier to wait to execute taper. Another option would be to offer calendar guidance but this seems to run counter to Powell’s desire for policy to be “outcome based” rather than “outlook based.” If the Fed keeps the language vague arguing for “substantial further progress”, it seems to leave options open.\nWhat about hikes\nThe Fed laid out the criteria to hike rates as three-fold:\n\ninflation needs to reach 2% and stay there for a year;\nconditions be met to believe that inflation can run moderately above 2% allowing for the overshoot to offset the undershoot;\nmaximum employment to be met with broad-based labor market recovery.\n\nThe first has been satisfied. We are on the way to meeting the second, although doubts remain - especially among the FOMC - given the potential transitory nature of inflation. The third criteria hasn’t been satisfied and also a likely needed for the second to be met.\nThe challenge, as Meyer explains, with declaring victory on the inflation overshoot is that we are vulnerable to inflation falling back below the target – at least temporarily – next year. For simplicity, let’s focus on the biggest source of transitory inflation: vehicles (defined here as used cars and trucks, rental cars and new vehicles). This makes up around 5% of core PCE. Over the last two months, about 40bp of the 1.2% gain in core PCE owed to these categories. To put this into perspective, if these categories were unchanged, core PCE would have been 0.48% mom in April (2.9% yoy) and 0.31% in May (3.0% yoy). For illustrative purposes, BofA also ran scenarios for %yoy core PCE inflation through next year based on the following paths for car prices: full mean reversion to preCOVID levels, 50% reversal and 25% reversal, assuming trend core inflation of 2.0% in all other categories. This would lead to core PCE of 1.3%, 1.6%, and 1.8%, respectively, as shown on the chart below.This shows the sensitivity of inflation to a singular volatile category.\n\nThe path toward maximum employment is also uncertain for two reasons:\n\nit is unclear how much of the decline in the labor force will prove permanent; and\nthe Fed has changed the definition of maximum employment.\n\nFor the former, BofA has previously estimated that the vast majority of those that dropped out of the labor force will be able to return with about half of the decline likely directly attributable to the pandemic. However,about 1.2 million reflects earlier retirement which is unlikely reversible.This will make it more challenging to fully recover the employment-to-population ratio (EPOP). Perhaps a work-around is to look for the prime-working age EPOP toreturn to pre-pandemic levels which can be achieved by March 2022 based on BofA's employment forecasts which currently is looking for a cumulative 5.9mn jobs to be created by 1Q 2022.\n\nThe other consideration mentioned by BofA,is that the Fed has changed its definition for maximum employment to be broad-based and \"inclusive.\"This means that the recovery in the EPOP has to be felt throughout the population particularly for the most economically challenged cohort, i.e.,no hikes until there is a surge in black employment. To achieve this, it will require an even tighter labor market where the “fringe” of the labor market is offered greater opportunities. This in particular calls for the prime-age EPOP to exceed pre-pandemic levels, further pushing out when the Fed might declare victory. And since it is the minority workers who have repeatedly stated they will not return to the labor force unless they get far more preferential terms,it is almost as if the Fed has engineered the current reaction function to one where it will continue to ease indefinitely and blame lack of \"recovery\" on black jobs for its refusal to stop the easing, as if injecting $120BN per month will somehow result in more black workers getting hired!\nThe Committee: divided\nLast but not least, there is a growing divide on the Committee which complicates forward guidance. As of the June meeting there were 7 FOMC officials who expected hikes to start in 2022. According to BofA,all of these officials are regional Fed Presidents, some of whom have never fully embraced FAIT (below is Bloomberg's assumption of who is who on the dot plot).\n\nAnd so, with the economy running strong and inflation pressures building – at least on the surface – these Fed officials are getting ready to remove accommodation. As BofA notes, this makes sense....if you are still operating in the old regime:remember that the Fed hiked rates for the first time with core PCE inflation well below target. The view was that it was preferable to slowly normalize policy based on expectations of future inflation and growth to avoid having to hike quickly and destabilize the recovery. Hence the challenge with keeping the new framework “flexible”. BofA believes the “core” of the Committee –Powell, Brainard and Clarida– are much more influential in setting the course for policy. The Board of Governors and NY Fed President Williams will generally be in agreement. It is this group that is still strongly committed to FAIT with more than a token overshoot of the 2% target, preferring to err on the side of too much rather than too little inflation. Moreover, they might not be as concerned about higher inflation: indeed, the Board staff forecast shows a slower trajectory for inflation based on the latest FOMC minutes. The Committee members’ voices will be heard and can influence the decisions of the FOMC with the force of their arguments. As such, Meyer's advice is to pay more attention to the centrist members of the FOMC – such as Bostic and Harker – whose arguments could resonate with the Board.\nFinally, markets, where we have seen a big moves in rates\nThe bond market has had a significant rally; at 1.30% the 10-year is back to mid-February levels. In fact, the curve has also flattened significantly in a way that typically doesn’t happen until the hiking cycle has started. So what gives? According to BofA's in house rates expert, Mark Cabana, the move is partly technical, driven by investors closing out short positions and trend-following hedge funds exacerbating rate moves. But it could also reflect the market becoming increasingly worried about structurally lower growth and inflation once the cyclical lift fades. It may also be that the market is doubting the Fed’s resolve to overheat the economy and facilitate higher inflation. For what it's worth, Meyer says that while the former is a reasonable argument, she strongly disagrees with the argument that the Fed has already blinked. That's because Powell has been setting the stage for this new framework even before the pandemic - which was a welcome catalyst to implement FAIT - and sees this as a chance to reset monetary policy.\nIn short: expect the flood of liquidity to continue for a long, long time.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9,"SPY":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1829,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":144700914,"gmtCreate":1626312669338,"gmtModify":1703757624585,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIDI\">$DiDi Global Inc.(DIDI)$</a>didididi","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DIDI\">$DiDi Global Inc.(DIDI)$</a>didididi","text":"$DiDi Global Inc.(DIDI)$didididi","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6c9e2db4e8a647e8b04e4119635122a0","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/144700914","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2862,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":142108699,"gmtCreate":1626135030811,"gmtModify":1703753927759,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gogogo","listText":"Gogogo","text":"Gogogo","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/142108699","repostId":"1160105017","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1962,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":372904373,"gmtCreate":1619165607192,"gmtModify":1704720636921,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AP4.SI\">$RIVERSTONE HOLDINGS LIMITED(AP4.SI)$</a>gogo","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AP4.SI\">$RIVERSTONE HOLDINGS LIMITED(AP4.SI)$</a>gogo","text":"$RIVERSTONE HOLDINGS LIMITED(AP4.SI)$gogo","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ba3abc6bc252731ed2b0ee22e713ed28","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/372904373","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":684,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":142101838,"gmtCreate":1626134960424,"gmtModify":1703753928742,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GEVO\">$Gevo(GEVO)$</a>when will you ever return?","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GEVO\">$Gevo(GEVO)$</a>when will you ever return?","text":"$Gevo(GEVO)$when will you ever return?","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0d9cc98d6b9ca17f247de68c3209bff9","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/142101838","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2467,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":376947369,"gmtCreate":1619084580651,"gmtModify":1704719382297,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PLG\">$Platinum Group Metals(PLG)$</a>Gogogo","listText":"<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PLG\">$Platinum Group Metals(PLG)$</a>Gogogo","text":"$Platinum Group Metals(PLG)$Gogogo","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2765c2caa338f36d961d1b991dfd293e","width":"1080","height":"1920"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/376947369","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1319,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":1,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":145343675,"gmtCreate":1626191799597,"gmtModify":1703755324285,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/145343675","repostId":"2151699115","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2151699115","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1626188420,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2151699115?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-13 23:00","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Conagra Shares Fall After Downbeat FY22 Outlook","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2151699115","media":"Benzinga","summary":"\n","content":"<ul>\n <li>Consumer packaged goods company <b>Conagra Brands Inc </b>(NYSE:CAG) reported fourth quarter FY21 sales of $2.73 billion, a 16.68% fall year-on-year, beating the consensus of $2.71 billion.</li>\n <li>Grocery &amp; Snacks segment sales fell 26.4% Y/Y to&nbsp;$1.1 billion and Refrigerated &amp; Frozen segment sales decreased 12.0% Y/Y to&nbsp;$1.2 billion.</li>\n <li>Adjusted gross profit fell 22.4% to&nbsp;$721 million.</li>\n <li>Adjusted gross margin decreased 194 basis points Y/Y to 26.3%.</li>\n <li>Adjusted operating margin decreased 311 basis points Y/Y to 14.0%.</li>\n <li>The company reported $263 million in adjusted selling, general, and administrative expense, a 14.7% decrease Y/Y.</li>\n <li>Adjusted EBITDA of $520 million fell 24.6% Y/Y.</li>\n <li>Adjusted EPS of $0.54 beat the consensus of $0.52.</li>\n <li>Cash and equivalents totaled $79.2 billion as of May 30, 2021.</li>\n <li><b>Outlook</b>: Conagra Brands<b> </b>has cut its FY22 Adjusted EPS guidance to ~$2.50 from the prior outlook of $2.63-$2.73, versus the consensus of $2.63.</li>\n <li>Organic net sales growth outlook is now expected to be flat, versus the prior growth expectation of 1% to 2%.</li>\n <li>Adjusted operating margin is expected to be approximately&nbsp;16%, versus prior outlook of 18% to 19%.</li>\n <li>\"As the fourth quarter unfolded, input cost inflation accelerated and we now expect fiscal 2022 input cost inflation to be materially higher than we anticipated at the end of fiscal Q3,” said CEO Sean Connolly.</li>\n <li><b>Price action:</b> CAG shares are trading lower by 4.91% at $34.76&nbsp;in premarket on the last check Tuesday.</li>\n</ul>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Conagra Shares Fall After Downbeat FY22 Outlook</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nConagra Shares Fall After Downbeat FY22 Outlook\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-13 23:00</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<ul>\n <li>Consumer packaged goods company <b>Conagra Brands Inc </b>(NYSE:CAG) reported fourth quarter FY21 sales of $2.73 billion, a 16.68% fall year-on-year, beating the consensus of $2.71 billion.</li>\n <li>Grocery &amp; Snacks segment sales fell 26.4% Y/Y to&nbsp;$1.1 billion and Refrigerated &amp; Frozen segment sales decreased 12.0% Y/Y to&nbsp;$1.2 billion.</li>\n <li>Adjusted gross profit fell 22.4% to&nbsp;$721 million.</li>\n <li>Adjusted gross margin decreased 194 basis points Y/Y to 26.3%.</li>\n <li>Adjusted operating margin decreased 311 basis points Y/Y to 14.0%.</li>\n <li>The company reported $263 million in adjusted selling, general, and administrative expense, a 14.7% decrease Y/Y.</li>\n <li>Adjusted EBITDA of $520 million fell 24.6% Y/Y.</li>\n <li>Adjusted EPS of $0.54 beat the consensus of $0.52.</li>\n <li>Cash and equivalents totaled $79.2 billion as of May 30, 2021.</li>\n <li><b>Outlook</b>: Conagra Brands<b> </b>has cut its FY22 Adjusted EPS guidance to ~$2.50 from the prior outlook of $2.63-$2.73, versus the consensus of $2.63.</li>\n <li>Organic net sales growth outlook is now expected to be flat, versus the prior growth expectation of 1% to 2%.</li>\n <li>Adjusted operating margin is expected to be approximately&nbsp;16%, versus prior outlook of 18% to 19%.</li>\n <li>\"As the fourth quarter unfolded, input cost inflation accelerated and we now expect fiscal 2022 input cost inflation to be materially higher than we anticipated at the end of fiscal Q3,” said CEO Sean Connolly.</li>\n <li><b>Price action:</b> CAG shares are trading lower by 4.91% at $34.76&nbsp;in premarket on the last check Tuesday.</li>\n</ul>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"CAG":"康尼格拉"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2151699115","content_text":"Consumer packaged goods company Conagra Brands Inc (NYSE:CAG) reported fourth quarter FY21 sales of $2.73 billion, a 16.68% fall year-on-year, beating the consensus of $2.71 billion.\nGrocery & Snacks segment sales fell 26.4% Y/Y to $1.1 billion and Refrigerated & Frozen segment sales decreased 12.0% Y/Y to $1.2 billion.\nAdjusted gross profit fell 22.4% to $721 million.\nAdjusted gross margin decreased 194 basis points Y/Y to 26.3%.\nAdjusted operating margin decreased 311 basis points Y/Y to 14.0%.\nThe company reported $263 million in adjusted selling, general, and administrative expense, a 14.7% decrease Y/Y.\nAdjusted EBITDA of $520 million fell 24.6% Y/Y.\nAdjusted EPS of $0.54 beat the consensus of $0.52.\nCash and equivalents totaled $79.2 billion as of May 30, 2021.\nOutlook: Conagra Brands has cut its FY22 Adjusted EPS guidance to ~$2.50 from the prior outlook of $2.63-$2.73, versus the consensus of $2.63.\nOrganic net sales growth outlook is now expected to be flat, versus the prior growth expectation of 1% to 2%.\nAdjusted operating margin is expected to be approximately 16%, versus prior outlook of 18% to 19%.\n\"As the fourth quarter unfolded, input cost inflation accelerated and we now expect fiscal 2022 input cost inflation to be materially higher than we anticipated at the end of fiscal Q3,” said CEO Sean Connolly.\nPrice action: CAG shares are trading lower by 4.91% at $34.76 in premarket on the last check Tuesday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"CAG":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2115,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":145349596,"gmtCreate":1626191746315,"gmtModify":1703755322980,"author":{"id":"3569409987151691","authorId":"3569409987151691","name":"Lofter","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3394367ede1906ca6bb802f9ee303024","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569409987151691","idStr":"3569409987151691"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/145349596","repostId":"2151156669","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1989,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}