ngiam96 personal page - To The Moon

ngiam96

No personal profile

55Follow

1Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-03-17

Like me pls

Kingsoft Cloud EPS beats by $0.17, misses on revenue

2021-03-20

Sad

Fed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next

2021-03-15

Pls likemt comment

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-03-22

Like me pls

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-03-08

Nice

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-04-03

O

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-03-20

Please like

Here Are The Stocks To Watch Ahead Of Today's Quad-Witch Gamma 'Unclenching'

2021-04-01

Like me pls

Asia's factory recovery picks up but cost pressures emerge

2021-03-16

Pls rpely to me

Sorry, the original content has been removed

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"3574684026781296","uuid":"3574684026781296","gmtCreate":1612229022369,"gmtModify":1612229022369,"name":"ngiam96","pinyin":"ngiam96","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":55,"tweetSize":0,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.03.14","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-1","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Elite Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 30","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":"60.28%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":4,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":349927811,"gmtCreate":1617525820433,"gmtModify":1704700237194,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574684026781296","idStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ifjdjd","listText":"Ifjdjd","text":"Ifjdjd","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/349927811","repostId":"2124875875","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2815,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":340520186,"gmtCreate":1617435707645,"gmtModify":1704699685446,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574684026781296","idStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"O","listText":"O","text":"O","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/340520186","repostId":"2124875875","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3024,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3575955563694893","authorId":"3575955563694893","name":"T20211126001","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/42cf33544f719c12b3a2aa7e6bd084b1","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"authorIdStr":"3575955563694893","idStr":"3575955563694893"},"content":"Please help to Reponse and liKe my comment thankd","text":"Please help to Reponse and liKe my comment thankd","html":"Please help to Reponse and liKe my comment thankd"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":357160543,"gmtCreate":1617247162282,"gmtModify":1704697771965,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574684026781296","idStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like me pls","listText":"Like me pls","text":"Like me pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/357160543","repostId":"2124056742","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2124056742","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1617245470,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2124056742?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-01 10:51","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Asia's factory recovery picks up but cost pressures emerge","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2124056742","media":"Reuters","summary":"TOKYO, April 1 (Reuters) - Asia's factories stepped up production in March as a solid recovery in gl","content":"<p>TOKYO, April 1 (Reuters) - Asia's factories stepped up production in March as a solid recovery in global demand helped manufacturers move past the setbacks of the pandemic, although rising costs are creating new challenges for businesses in the region.</p><p>A series of upbeat factory surveys released on Thursday reinforce market optimism that vaccine rollouts, as well as strong growth in global powerhouses like the United States and China, will help economies emerge from their sharp downturns of 2020.</p><p>Japan and South Korea saw factory activity expand in March thanks to solid demand at home and abroad, purchasing manager indexes' <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PMI.UK\">$(PMI.UK)$</a> showed, offering relief to policymakers facing pressure to speed up a patchy recovery.</p><p>\"South Korean manufacturers continued to signal strong optimism as the rollout of COVID-19 vaccinations began and demand for new products accelerated,\" said Usamah Bhatti, economist at IHS <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRKT\">Markit</a>.</p><p>China's factory activity in March expanded at the slowest pace in almost a year, though underlying economic conditions remained positive.</p><p>The Caixin/Markit Manufacturing PMI, which focuses on smaller firms, dropped to 50.6 in March from February's 50.9, missing market expectations.</p><p>The private-sector survey came after Wednesday's release of the official manufacturing PMI that showed Chinese factories cranking up production after a brief lull during the Lunar New Year holiday.</p><p>Activity in big, export-reliant economies stayed brisk.</p><p>The final au Jibun Bank Japan PMI rose to a seasonally adjusted 52.7 in March from the previous month's 51.4 reading, marking the fastest expansion since October 2018.</p><p>South Korea's PMI stood at 55.3 in March, with activity expanding for a sixth straight month.</p><p>Manufacturing activity also accelerated in Taiwan, Vietnam and Indonesia, the March PMI surveys showed. Malaysian activity continued to decline but at a slower pace.</p><p>There were some signs rising prices were straining firms, however, clouding the outlook for Asian economies.</p><p>Although supply chain disruption related to previous COVID-19 outbreaks eased, China's Caixin survey showed factories reporting a sharp increase in input costs.</p><p>\"We should pay attention to inflation in future as the gauges for input and output prices have been rising for several months,\" said Wang Zhe, Senior Economist at Caixin Insight Group.</p><p>\"The growing inflationary pressure limits the room for future policies and is not a good thing for sustaining an economic recovery in the post-epidemic period.\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Asia's factory recovery picks up but cost pressures emerge</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAsia's factory recovery picks up but cost pressures emerge\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-01 10:51</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>TOKYO, April 1 (Reuters) - Asia's factories stepped up production in March as a solid recovery in global demand helped manufacturers move past the setbacks of the pandemic, although rising costs are creating new challenges for businesses in the region.</p><p>A series of upbeat factory surveys released on Thursday reinforce market optimism that vaccine rollouts, as well as strong growth in global powerhouses like the United States and China, will help economies emerge from their sharp downturns of 2020.</p><p>Japan and South Korea saw factory activity expand in March thanks to solid demand at home and abroad, purchasing manager indexes' <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PMI.UK\">$(PMI.UK)$</a> showed, offering relief to policymakers facing pressure to speed up a patchy recovery.</p><p>\"South Korean manufacturers continued to signal strong optimism as the rollout of COVID-19 vaccinations began and demand for new products accelerated,\" said Usamah Bhatti, economist at IHS <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRKT\">Markit</a>.</p><p>China's factory activity in March expanded at the slowest pace in almost a year, though underlying economic conditions remained positive.</p><p>The Caixin/Markit Manufacturing PMI, which focuses on smaller firms, dropped to 50.6 in March from February's 50.9, missing market expectations.</p><p>The private-sector survey came after Wednesday's release of the official manufacturing PMI that showed Chinese factories cranking up production after a brief lull during the Lunar New Year holiday.</p><p>Activity in big, export-reliant economies stayed brisk.</p><p>The final au Jibun Bank Japan PMI rose to a seasonally adjusted 52.7 in March from the previous month's 51.4 reading, marking the fastest expansion since October 2018.</p><p>South Korea's PMI stood at 55.3 in March, with activity expanding for a sixth straight month.</p><p>Manufacturing activity also accelerated in Taiwan, Vietnam and Indonesia, the March PMI surveys showed. Malaysian activity continued to decline but at a slower pace.</p><p>There were some signs rising prices were straining firms, however, clouding the outlook for Asian economies.</p><p>Although supply chain disruption related to previous COVID-19 outbreaks eased, China's Caixin survey showed factories reporting a sharp increase in input costs.</p><p>\"We should pay attention to inflation in future as the gauges for input and output prices have been rising for several months,\" said Wang Zhe, Senior Economist at Caixin Insight Group.</p><p>\"The growing inflationary pressure limits the room for future policies and is not a good thing for sustaining an economic recovery in the post-epidemic period.\"</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2124056742","content_text":"TOKYO, April 1 (Reuters) - Asia's factories stepped up production in March as a solid recovery in global demand helped manufacturers move past the setbacks of the pandemic, although rising costs are creating new challenges for businesses in the region.A series of upbeat factory surveys released on Thursday reinforce market optimism that vaccine rollouts, as well as strong growth in global powerhouses like the United States and China, will help economies emerge from their sharp downturns of 2020.Japan and South Korea saw factory activity expand in March thanks to solid demand at home and abroad, purchasing manager indexes' $(PMI.UK)$ showed, offering relief to policymakers facing pressure to speed up a patchy recovery.\"South Korean manufacturers continued to signal strong optimism as the rollout of COVID-19 vaccinations began and demand for new products accelerated,\" said Usamah Bhatti, economist at IHS Markit.China's factory activity in March expanded at the slowest pace in almost a year, though underlying economic conditions remained positive.The Caixin/Markit Manufacturing PMI, which focuses on smaller firms, dropped to 50.6 in March from February's 50.9, missing market expectations.The private-sector survey came after Wednesday's release of the official manufacturing PMI that showed Chinese factories cranking up production after a brief lull during the Lunar New Year holiday.Activity in big, export-reliant economies stayed brisk.The final au Jibun Bank Japan PMI rose to a seasonally adjusted 52.7 in March from the previous month's 51.4 reading, marking the fastest expansion since October 2018.South Korea's PMI stood at 55.3 in March, with activity expanding for a sixth straight month.Manufacturing activity also accelerated in Taiwan, Vietnam and Indonesia, the March PMI surveys showed. Malaysian activity continued to decline but at a slower pace.There were some signs rising prices were straining firms, however, clouding the outlook for Asian economies.Although supply chain disruption related to previous COVID-19 outbreaks eased, China's Caixin survey showed factories reporting a sharp increase in input costs.\"We should pay attention to inflation in future as the gauges for input and output prices have been rising for several months,\" said Wang Zhe, Senior Economist at Caixin Insight Group.\"The growing inflationary pressure limits the room for future policies and is not a good thing for sustaining an economic recovery in the post-epidemic period.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2920,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":355242138,"gmtCreate":1617079584124,"gmtModify":1704801683207,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574684026781296","idStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Gghh","listText":"Gghh","text":"Gghh","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/355242138","repostId":"2123126349","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2284,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":356212770,"gmtCreate":1616778220490,"gmtModify":1704798952527,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574684026781296","idStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ruruhr","listText":"Ruruhr","text":"Ruruhr","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/356212770","repostId":"1109499191","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1109499191","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1616766726,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1109499191?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-26 21:52","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Some “meme” stocks are flying again.","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1109499191","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Some “meme” stocks are flying again in Friday morning trading.The shares of NAKD is up 22%,GameStop ","content":"<p>Some “meme” stocks are flying again&nbsp;in Friday morning trading.The shares of NAKD is up 22%,GameStop is up 18%，Nikola&nbsp;is&nbsp;up&nbsp;4%&nbsp;and&nbsp;AMC&nbsp;is&nbsp;up&nbsp;3%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8e92190c4c2210799a5c7eed4a46654\" tg-width=\"377\" tg-height=\"601\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Some “meme” stocks are flying again.</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSome “meme” stocks are flying again.\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-03-26 21:52</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Some “meme” stocks are flying again&nbsp;in Friday morning trading.The shares of NAKD is up 22%,GameStop is up 18%，Nikola&nbsp;is&nbsp;up&nbsp;4%&nbsp;and&nbsp;AMC&nbsp;is&nbsp;up&nbsp;3%.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8e92190c4c2210799a5c7eed4a46654\" tg-width=\"377\" tg-height=\"601\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AMC":"AMC院线","GME":"游戏驿站"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1109499191","content_text":"Some “meme” stocks are flying again in Friday morning trading.The shares of NAKD is up 22%,GameStop is up 18%，Nikola is up 4% and AMC is up 3%.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NKLA":0.9,"AMC":0.9,"GME":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2425,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":358060481,"gmtCreate":1616641206843,"gmtModify":1704796800167,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574684026781296","idStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Lol","listText":"Lol","text":"Lol","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/358060481","repostId":"1123019252","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1123019252","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616639768,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1123019252?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-25 10:36","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Why NIO Stock Is Down","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1123019252","media":"fool","summary":"Shares of Chinese electric-vehicle makerNIOwere trading lower on Wednesday, amid broad market turbulence affecting shares of manyelectric vehicle makersand other emerging technology companies.There was no major news driving NIO's shares lower -- or major news of any kind that was directly related to NIO or its stock. The company did share some minor news, but it seems positive: As of 3:16 a.m. local time, a NIO battery-swap station in Suzhou  completed the company's 2 millionth battery swap.NIO ","content":"<p>What happened</p>\n<p>Shares of Chinese electric-vehicle maker<b>NIO</b>were trading lower on Wednesday, amid broad market turbulence affecting shares of manyelectric vehicle makersand other emerging technology companies.</p>\n<p>So what</p>\n<p>There was no major news driving NIO's shares lower -- or major news of any kind that was directly related to NIO or its stock. The company did share some minor news, but it seems positive: As of 3:16 a.m. local time, a NIO battery-swap station in Suzhou (just west of Shanghai) completed the company's 2 millionth battery swap.</p>\n<p>NIO said that its network of over 200 battery-swap stations -- which automatically swap a NIO's battery pack for a fully charged one -- now complete a swap about once every 10 seconds, on average.</p>\n<p>It's not huge news, and it's certainly not what's moving the stock today. But now you know.</p>\n<p>Now what</p>\n<p>That seconds-between-battery-swaps number could well fall over the next several months, as NIO begins deploying its new \"second-generation\" battery-swap stations. The new stations can store more battery packs and complete swaps more quickly than the current units, and theycost less to build, NIO said earlier this month.</p>\n<p>NIO confirmed on Wednesday that it expects the first of those second-generation stations to be up and running in mid-April.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Why NIO Stock Is Down</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhy NIO Stock Is Down\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-25 10:36 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/24/why-nio-stock-is-down-today/><strong>fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>What happened\nShares of Chinese electric-vehicle makerNIOwere trading lower on Wednesday, amid broad market turbulence affecting shares of manyelectric vehicle makersand other emerging technology ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/24/why-nio-stock-is-down-today/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3b92523152bd36c422721756606e549","relate_stocks":{"NIO":"蔚来"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/24/why-nio-stock-is-down-today/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1123019252","content_text":"What happened\nShares of Chinese electric-vehicle makerNIOwere trading lower on Wednesday, amid broad market turbulence affecting shares of manyelectric vehicle makersand other emerging technology companies.\nSo what\nThere was no major news driving NIO's shares lower -- or major news of any kind that was directly related to NIO or its stock. The company did share some minor news, but it seems positive: As of 3:16 a.m. local time, a NIO battery-swap station in Suzhou (just west of Shanghai) completed the company's 2 millionth battery swap.\nNIO said that its network of over 200 battery-swap stations -- which automatically swap a NIO's battery pack for a fully charged one -- now complete a swap about once every 10 seconds, on average.\nIt's not huge news, and it's certainly not what's moving the stock today. But now you know.\nNow what\nThat seconds-between-battery-swaps number could well fall over the next several months, as NIO begins deploying its new \"second-generation\" battery-swap stations. The new stations can store more battery packs and complete swaps more quickly than the current units, and theycost less to build, NIO said earlier this month.\nNIO confirmed on Wednesday that it expects the first of those second-generation stations to be up and running in mid-April.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NIO":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3111,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":351653179,"gmtCreate":1616594624691,"gmtModify":1704796159825,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574684026781296","idStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Rjjfjf","listText":"Rjjfjf","text":"Rjjfjf","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/351653179","repostId":"1163829159","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1163829159","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616591036,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1163829159?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-24 21:03","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here's Why Beyond Meat Stock Could Shine Again in 2021","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1163829159","media":"Motley Fool ","summary":"Consumer spending is normalizing, and the meat substitute leader could have much to gain from a reop","content":"<p>Consumer spending is normalizing, and the meat substitute leader could have much to gain from a reopening economy.</p>\n<p>Since its epic rise after its IPO in 2019, the stock for plant-based-protein pioneer&nbsp;<b>Beyond Meat</b>&nbsp;(NASDAQ:BYND)&nbsp;has been stuck in a sideways action. The company has been hit by a flood of new competition, a pandemic, and a steady stream of bearish calls lambasting the high-flying stock's valuation. In spite of all this, though, the company has managed to stay (just barely at times) in growth mode.</p>\n<p>As 2021 gets underway, the extended slumber for this next-gen food stock could be ready to reverse course. Here's why.</p>\n<p><b>This is one way for a stock to crash</b></p>\n<p>After the extreme optimism in the months following its IPO, Beyond Meat stock has been a roller coaster ride. It's dropped, it's made several attempts to run higher, but ultimately it has come back to the same station from which it started almost two years ago: a&nbsp;market cap&nbsp;just shy of $9 billion.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/855358a1d48d9d00410554baeff7ab31\" tg-width=\"2000\" tg-height=\"1333\"><span>IS IT A BEEF PATTY, OR A PLANT-BASED ONE? IT'S HARDER TO TELL THESE DAYS. IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.</span></p>\n<p>This kind of volatile sideways action is one way for a stock to \"crash.\" Since the irrational exuberance wore off in the summer of 2019, Beyond Meat stock is sitting at essentially a 0% return. Meanwhile, the&nbsp;<b>S&amp;P 500</b>&nbsp;is up 33%.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a11cfc35183cbcaac25c7c4b8e835253\" tg-width=\"720\" tg-height=\"435\"><span>DATA BY YCHARTS.</span></p>\n<p>As previously mentioned, though, Beyond Meat itself has continued to grow its business. Even in 2020, it weathered the COVID-19 storm and was able to maintain some positive traction disrupting the massive animal-based protein industry. Foodservice sales -- those made to restaurants -- took a sizable hit as consumers chose to eat at home during the pandemic, but retail sales via its grocery store distributors more than picked up the slack.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/193132417a321a9d268f89a8d55326ef\" tg-width=\"1149\" tg-height=\"420\"><span>DATA SOURCE: BEYOND MEAT. YOY = YEAR OVER YEAR.</span></p>\n<p>Granted, none of this means Beyond Meat shares are trading for some sort of bargain. At 22 times trailing-12-month sales and not reporting much in the way of meaningful profits yet (adjusted&nbsp;EBITDA&nbsp;was just $11.8 million in 2020 on total revenue of $407 million), suffice to say Beyond Meat is expected to return to rapid expansion in 2021 and, well, beyond.</p>\n<p>Powerful brand recognition in an otherwise commoditized marketplace</p>\n<p>I think there's a good chance the implied growth shareholders are expecting will transpire. With the economy reopening, consumers will start returning to restaurants. And restaurants themselves will start to normalize their supply chains, too. Simplified menus with fewer options -- an attempt to cut expenses -- hurt Beyond Meat as much as lower customer foot traffic did.</p>\n<p>But this is more than an economic reopening bet. Beyond Meat and its peer Impossible Foods are on a mission to reduce animal protein consumption and promote more economically friendly practices. The message continues to win over fans. Some fast followers among food supplier incumbents have benefited, too (like&nbsp;<b>Nestle</b>&nbsp;and itsSweet Earth subsidiary). But as competition mounts and pricing on plant-based protein products falls, Beyond Meat has done a pretty good job&nbsp;holding on to some profit margin. Increasing retail and foodservice distribution will help this cause over time now that it's built out its manufacturing capabilities. Given the multiple dynamics behind the plant-based protein movement, Beyond Meat is looking increasingly less like a fad (hard seltzer, anyone?) and more like a potential long-term trend.</p>\n<p>Here's another case in point: It's rare for restaurants to name their supplier in marketing campaigns. But there are exceptions. Think&nbsp;<b>Coca-Cola</b>&nbsp;products with fiercely loyal fans of its drinks,<b>PepsiCo</b>&nbsp;and its drinks and snack foods, or the \"Certified Angus Beef\" trademark. To pique diner interest, a restaurant might name drop a key food supplier if it has brand power. It's early in the game, but Beyond Meat is exhibiting this kind of consumer awareness and brand loyalty. When's the last time you saw a fast-food company tout carrying Sweet Earth burger patties? Beyond Meat, by contrast, often gets mentioned. And it continues to forge relationships within foodservice -- most recently&nbsp;inking new deals&nbsp;with&nbsp;two of world's largest chains,<b>McDonald's</b>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<b>Yum! Brands</b>.</p>\n<p>I'm not saying to go out and load up on Beyond Meat stock as the economy (and consumer spending) starts to normalize. A lot is riding on the plant-based food company returning to rapid growth, and with the effects of the pandemic still ongoing, those efforts could be derailed. However, if it does recapture some double-digit percentage expansion, 2021 could be the year Beyond Meat stock shines once more.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here's Why Beyond Meat Stock Could Shine Again in 2021</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere's Why Beyond Meat Stock Could Shine Again in 2021\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-24 21:03 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/24/why-beyond-meat-stock-could-shine-again-in-2021/><strong>Motley Fool </strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Consumer spending is normalizing, and the meat substitute leader could have much to gain from a reopening economy.\nSince its epic rise after its IPO in 2019, the stock for plant-based-protein pioneer ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/24/why-beyond-meat-stock-could-shine-again-in-2021/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"BYND":"Beyond Meat, Inc."},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2021/03/24/why-beyond-meat-stock-could-shine-again-in-2021/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1163829159","content_text":"Consumer spending is normalizing, and the meat substitute leader could have much to gain from a reopening economy.\nSince its epic rise after its IPO in 2019, the stock for plant-based-protein pioneer Beyond Meat (NASDAQ:BYND) has been stuck in a sideways action. The company has been hit by a flood of new competition, a pandemic, and a steady stream of bearish calls lambasting the high-flying stock's valuation. In spite of all this, though, the company has managed to stay (just barely at times) in growth mode.\nAs 2021 gets underway, the extended slumber for this next-gen food stock could be ready to reverse course. Here's why.\nThis is one way for a stock to crash\nAfter the extreme optimism in the months following its IPO, Beyond Meat stock has been a roller coaster ride. It's dropped, it's made several attempts to run higher, but ultimately it has come back to the same station from which it started almost two years ago: a market cap just shy of $9 billion.\nIS IT A BEEF PATTY, OR A PLANT-BASED ONE? IT'S HARDER TO TELL THESE DAYS. IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.\nThis kind of volatile sideways action is one way for a stock to \"crash.\" Since the irrational exuberance wore off in the summer of 2019, Beyond Meat stock is sitting at essentially a 0% return. Meanwhile, the S&P 500 is up 33%.\nDATA BY YCHARTS.\nAs previously mentioned, though, Beyond Meat itself has continued to grow its business. Even in 2020, it weathered the COVID-19 storm and was able to maintain some positive traction disrupting the massive animal-based protein industry. Foodservice sales -- those made to restaurants -- took a sizable hit as consumers chose to eat at home during the pandemic, but retail sales via its grocery store distributors more than picked up the slack.\nDATA SOURCE: BEYOND MEAT. YOY = YEAR OVER YEAR.\nGranted, none of this means Beyond Meat shares are trading for some sort of bargain. At 22 times trailing-12-month sales and not reporting much in the way of meaningful profits yet (adjusted EBITDA was just $11.8 million in 2020 on total revenue of $407 million), suffice to say Beyond Meat is expected to return to rapid expansion in 2021 and, well, beyond.\nPowerful brand recognition in an otherwise commoditized marketplace\nI think there's a good chance the implied growth shareholders are expecting will transpire. With the economy reopening, consumers will start returning to restaurants. And restaurants themselves will start to normalize their supply chains, too. Simplified menus with fewer options -- an attempt to cut expenses -- hurt Beyond Meat as much as lower customer foot traffic did.\nBut this is more than an economic reopening bet. Beyond Meat and its peer Impossible Foods are on a mission to reduce animal protein consumption and promote more economically friendly practices. The message continues to win over fans. Some fast followers among food supplier incumbents have benefited, too (like Nestle and itsSweet Earth subsidiary). But as competition mounts and pricing on plant-based protein products falls, Beyond Meat has done a pretty good job holding on to some profit margin. Increasing retail and foodservice distribution will help this cause over time now that it's built out its manufacturing capabilities. Given the multiple dynamics behind the plant-based protein movement, Beyond Meat is looking increasingly less like a fad (hard seltzer, anyone?) and more like a potential long-term trend.\nHere's another case in point: It's rare for restaurants to name their supplier in marketing campaigns. But there are exceptions. Think Coca-Cola products with fiercely loyal fans of its drinks,PepsiCo and its drinks and snack foods, or the \"Certified Angus Beef\" trademark. To pique diner interest, a restaurant might name drop a key food supplier if it has brand power. It's early in the game, but Beyond Meat is exhibiting this kind of consumer awareness and brand loyalty. When's the last time you saw a fast-food company tout carrying Sweet Earth burger patties? Beyond Meat, by contrast, often gets mentioned. And it continues to forge relationships within foodservice -- most recently inking new deals with two of world's largest chains,McDonald's and Yum! Brands.\nI'm not saying to go out and load up on Beyond Meat stock as the economy (and consumer spending) starts to normalize. A lot is riding on the plant-based food company returning to rapid growth, and with the effects of the pandemic still ongoing, those efforts could be derailed. However, if it does recapture some double-digit percentage expansion, 2021 could be the year Beyond Meat stock shines once more.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BYND":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2689,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":353708526,"gmtCreate":1616520315465,"gmtModify":1704795260916,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574684026781296","idStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/353708526","repostId":"1112366006","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2719,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":359192839,"gmtCreate":1616372138621,"gmtModify":1704793116024,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574684026781296","idStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like me pls","listText":"Like me pls","text":"Like me pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/359192839","repostId":"1126157111","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3566,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":350144936,"gmtCreate":1616169800625,"gmtModify":1704791888007,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574684026781296","idStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Please like&nbsp;","listText":"Please like&nbsp;","text":"Please like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/350144936","repostId":"1106180509","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1106180509","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616161534,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1106180509?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-19 21:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here Are The Stocks To Watch Ahead Of Today's Quad-Witch Gamma 'Unclenching'","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1106180509","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Today's quad-witching options expirations are likely to remove even more potential stabilizing flows","content":"<p>Today's quad-witching options expirations are likely to remove even more potential stabilizing flows from US equity markets as roughly<b>25% of S&amp;P gamma rolls off, with 40% of QQQ and 50% of single stocks</b>. AsSpotGamma reminds us, the bulk of SPX gamma expires at 9:30AM EST, but that position is heavily outsized by SPY/QQQ which expires&nbsp; at the 4pm EST close. This gamma unclench and delta de-risk lower could<b>accelerate any downside moves in the markets</b>.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/23bc9b6e77ee042a748f9e649cdbd3f1\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"375\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">SpotGammasays that the<b>S&amp;P must hold the 390/3900 critical flip line,</b>even though we see little in the way of S&amp;P put positions (and therefore negative S&amp;P500 gamma) below</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf6f304619aa55a563018f59085453b4\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"344\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">AsSpotGammaconcludes, said another way,<b>“buying the dip” is not advised if SPX breaks 3900.</b>However, the post-quad-witch picture is more optimistic because while the QQQ puts expiring today provide downside fuel, they will also be very sensitive to implied volatility and decay, and so<b>if there is a bounce at the open it could setup a decent QQQ rally into the 315-320 area as dealers quickly cover</b>their corresponding short hedges.</p><p>Into Monday these tech puts could provide a decent dealer short hedge (and therefore market tailwind) and reduce QQQ volatility next week. The lower QQQ closes the larger the dealer short will be that is tied to todays close. Therefore a lower close provides more “bounce fuel” into the start of next week.</p><p>Also brace for higher single stock volatility today due to the large amount of single stock options expiring today. As Goldman notes,<b>$655bn of options set to expire today, a record for non-January expiries and the third largest overall.</b>Today’s expiry could be important for stocks with large open interest in at-the-money (ATM) options; market makers delta-hedging their unusually large options portfolios will be active.</p><p><b>Here are the stocks where option activity could have big impact</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2dd4934592756abdb35473d2ffcf21fb\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"718\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Stocks where a large percentage of contracts, relative to their average daily volume traded, expire on Friday, potentially leading to “pinning”. However, if delta-hedgers are net short ATM options (have a “negative gamma” position), their hedging activity could exacerbate stock price moves. This ﬂow is likely to dampen volatility in some names while exacerbating stock price moves in others.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here Are The Stocks To Watch Ahead Of Today's Quad-Witch Gamma 'Unclenching'</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere Are The Stocks To Watch Ahead Of Today's Quad-Witch Gamma 'Unclenching'\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-19 21:45 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/here-are-stocks-watch-ahead-todays-quad-witch-gamma-unclenching?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Today's quad-witching options expirations are likely to remove even more potential stabilizing flows from US equity markets as roughly25% of S&P gamma rolls off, with 40% of QQQ and 50% of single ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/here-are-stocks-watch-ahead-todays-quad-witch-gamma-unclenching?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/here-are-stocks-watch-ahead-todays-quad-witch-gamma-unclenching?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1106180509","content_text":"Today's quad-witching options expirations are likely to remove even more potential stabilizing flows from US equity markets as roughly25% of S&P gamma rolls off, with 40% of QQQ and 50% of single stocks. AsSpotGamma reminds us, the bulk of SPX gamma expires at 9:30AM EST, but that position is heavily outsized by SPY/QQQ which expires  at the 4pm EST close. This gamma unclench and delta de-risk lower couldaccelerate any downside moves in the markets.SpotGammasays that theS&P must hold the 390/3900 critical flip line,even though we see little in the way of S&P put positions (and therefore negative S&P500 gamma) belowAsSpotGammaconcludes, said another way,“buying the dip” is not advised if SPX breaks 3900.However, the post-quad-witch picture is more optimistic because while the QQQ puts expiring today provide downside fuel, they will also be very sensitive to implied volatility and decay, and soif there is a bounce at the open it could setup a decent QQQ rally into the 315-320 area as dealers quickly covertheir corresponding short hedges.Into Monday these tech puts could provide a decent dealer short hedge (and therefore market tailwind) and reduce QQQ volatility next week. The lower QQQ closes the larger the dealer short will be that is tied to todays close. Therefore a lower close provides more “bounce fuel” into the start of next week.Also brace for higher single stock volatility today due to the large amount of single stock options expiring today. As Goldman notes,$655bn of options set to expire today, a record for non-January expiries and the third largest overall.Today’s expiry could be important for stocks with large open interest in at-the-money (ATM) options; market makers delta-hedging their unusually large options portfolios will be active.Here are the stocks where option activity could have big impactStocks where a large percentage of contracts, relative to their average daily volume traded, expire on Friday, potentially leading to “pinning”. However, if delta-hedgers are net short ATM options (have a “negative gamma” position), their hedging activity could exacerbate stock price moves. This ﬂow is likely to dampen volatility in some names while exacerbating stock price moves in others.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2882,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":350145533,"gmtCreate":1616169753822,"gmtModify":1704791887197,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574684026781296","idStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Sad","listText":"Sad","text":"Sad","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/350145533","repostId":"1199154789","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199154789","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616164372,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199154789?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-19 22:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199154789","media":"zerohedge","summary":"As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio  exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on ","content":"<p>As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.</p><blockquote>The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on March 31, 2021.The temporary change was made to provide flexibility for depository institutions to provide credit to households and businesses in light of the COVID-19 event.</blockquote><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b822960da59d651f093b5113cd0c3fd0\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"319\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">This outcome is theone (again) correctly predictedby former NY Fed guru Zoltan Pozsar who following the FOMC said that \"the fact that the Fed made this adjustment practically preemptively – the o/n RRP facility is not being used at the moment, so there are no capacity constraints yet, while repo and bill yields aren’t trading negative yet –<b>suggests that the Fed is “foaming the runway” for the end of SLR exemption</b>.\"</p><p>Knowing well this would be a very hot button issue for the market, the Fed published thefollowing statementto ease trader nerves, noting that while the SLR special treatment will expire on March 31, the Fed is \"inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications\" and furthermore, \"<b>Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability</b>\" - in short, if yields spike, the Fed will re-introduce the SLR without delay:</p><blockquote>The Federal Reserve Board on Friday announced that the temporary change to its supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for bank holding companies will expire as scheduled on March 31. <b>Additionally, the Board will shortly seek comment on measures to adjust the SLR. The Board will take appropriate actions to assure that any changes to the SLR do not erode the overall strength of bank capital requirements.</b>To ease strains in the Treasury market resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to promote lending to households and businesses, the Board temporarily modified the SLR last year to exclude U.S. Treasury securities and central bank reserves. Since that time, the Treasury market has stabilized. <b>However, because of recent growth in the supply of central bank reserves and the issuance of Treasury securities, the Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability.To ensure that the SLR—which was established in 2014 as an additional capital requirement—remains effective in an environment of higher reserves, the Board will soon be inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications.</b>The proposal and comments will contribute to ongoing discussions with the Department of the Treasury and other regulators on future work to ensure the resiliency of the Treasury market.</blockquote><p>The Fed's soothing wods notwithstanding,<b>having been primed for a favorable outcome, the Fed's disappointing announcement was hardly the news traders were hoping for and stocks tumbled...</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c341c3843a5031cd1599c2c89e198050\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"305\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Bond yields spiked...</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14173c1ce587fb45efe4c30ecc1dfbab\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"284\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">... while the stock of JPM, which is the most exposed bank to SLR relief (as noted yesterday in \"Facing Up To JP Morgan's Leverage Relief Threats\")...</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32811183fba3dbddf1c440836298c7f3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"602\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">.... slumped.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2fba41463f15e79d2b8436cdd6a526fc\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"306\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">In case you've been living under a rock, here's why you should care about the SLR decision: First, for those whomissed our primer on the issue, some background from JPM (ironically the one bank that has the most to lose from the Fed's decision) the bottom line is that without SLR relief,<b>banks may have to delever, raise new capital, halt buybacks, sell preferred stock, turn down deposits and generally push back on reserves (not necessarily all of these, and not in that order) just as the Fed is injecting hundreds of billions of reserves into the market as the Treasury depletes its TGA account.</b></p><blockquote>The massive expansion of the Fed’s balance that has occurred implied an equally massive growth in bank reserves held at Federal Reserve banks. <b>The expiration of the regulatory relief would add ~$2.1tn of leverage exposure across the 8 GSIBs. As well, TGA reduction and continued QE could add another ~$2.35tn of deposits to the system during 2021.</b></blockquote><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/392342c2f3e1dd008b2276172a9b3ecf\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"253\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">While the expiry of the carve-out on March 31 would not have an immediate impact on GSIBs, the continued increase in leverage assets throughout the course of the year would increase long-term debt (LTD) and preferred requirements. Here, JPM takes an optimistic view and writes that<b>\"even the “worst” case issuance scenario as very manageable, with LTD needs of $35bn for TLAC requirements and preferred needs of $15-$20bn to maintain the industry-wide SLR at 5.6%.</b></p><p>The constraint is greater at the bank entity, where the capacity to grow leverage exposure to be ~$765bn at 6.2% SLR.\"Goldman's take was more troubling: the bank estimated that under the continued QE regime, there would be a shortfall of some $2 trillion in reserve capacity, mainly in the form of deposits which the banks would be unable to accept as part of ongoing QE (much more in Goldman'sfull take of the SLR quandary).</p><p><b>So what happens next?</b></p><p>Addressing this topic, yesterday Curvature's Scott Skyrm wrote that \"<i>the largest banks are enjoying much larger balance sheets, but there are political factors in Washington that are against an extension of the exemption.... Here are a couple of scenarios and their implications on the Repo market</i>:</p><blockquote>The exemption is extended 3 months or 6 months - No impact on the Repo market. It's already fully priced-in.The exemption is continued for reserves, but ended for Treasurys. <b>Since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise. Volatility increases as Repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants.The exemption is ended for both reserves and Treasurys. Same as above.</b></blockquote><p>In other words, Skyrm has a relatively downbeat view, warning that \"since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise.\" Additionally, volatility is likely to increase as repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants...</p><p>Perhaps a bit too draconian? Well, last week, JPMorgan laid out 5 scenarios for SLR, of which two predicted the end of SLR relief on March 31, as follow:</p><blockquote><u><b>3. Relief ends March 31, banks fully raise capital</b></u> <b>Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates</b> <u><b>4. Relief ends March 31, banks raise capital &amp; de-lever</b></u> <b>Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates</b></blockquote><p>Going back to Zoltan, let's recallthat the repo gurualso cautioned that \"ending the exemption of reserves and Treasuries from the calculation of the SLR may mean that U.S. banks will turn away deposits and reserves on the margin (not Treasuries) to leave more room for market-making activities,<b>and these flows will swell further money funds’ inflows coming from TGA drawdowns.</b>\"</p><p>More importantly, Zoltan does not expect broad chaos in repo or broader markets, and instead provides a more benign view on the negligible impact the SLR has had (and will be if it is eliminated), as he explained in a note from Tuesday.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/caeeb2b1290e084832f29d61cea6a90b\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"534\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">How to determine if Zoltan's benign view is correct? He concluded his note by writing that \"given that our call for a zero-to-negative FRA-OIS spread by the end of June was predicated on the end of SLR extension and an assumption that the Fed will try to fix a quantity problem with prices, not quantities, today’s adjustments mean that FRA-OIS won’t trade all the way down to zero or negative territory.\"</p><blockquote>FRA-OIS from here will be a function of how tight FX swaps will trade relative to OIS, but Treasury bills trading at deeply sub-zero rates is no longer a risk...</blockquote><p>While Bills have occasionally dipped into the negative territory on occasion, so far they have avoided a fullblown plunge into NIRP, which may be just the positive sign the market is waiting for to ease the nerves associated with the sudden and largely unexpected end of the SLR exemption.</p><p>* *&nbsp; *</p><p>Finally, for those curious what the immediate market impact will be, NatWest strategist Blake Gwinn writes that the Fed announcement that they’re letting regulatory exemptions for banks expire at the end of the month \"really threads the needle and \"assuages concerns about the potential long-term impact on the markets\" as<b>the SLR \"ends it but defuses a lot of the knee-jerk market reaction” by pledging to address the current design and calibration of the supplementary leverage ratio to prevent strains from developing</b>.</p><p>“I was never worried about a day-one bank puke of Treasuries or drawdown in repo or anything like that on no renewal,” Gwinn said. “My concern was the longer run,” like as reserves continue to rise, would the SLR “become a nuisance and drag on Treasuries and spreads” Gwinn concludes that with the statement, the Fed is<b>\"really speaking to those fears and basically saying, ‘don’t worry, we are on it’.”</b></p><p>Well, with yields spiking to HOD in early quad-witch trading, the market sure seems quite skeptical that the Fed is on anything.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-19 22:32 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/stocks-bopnds-tank-after-fed-lets-slr-relief-expire><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/stocks-bopnds-tank-after-fed-lets-slr-relief-expire\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/stocks-bopnds-tank-after-fed-lets-slr-relief-expire","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199154789","content_text":"As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on March 31, 2021.The temporary change was made to provide flexibility for depository institutions to provide credit to households and businesses in light of the COVID-19 event.This outcome is theone (again) correctly predictedby former NY Fed guru Zoltan Pozsar who following the FOMC said that \"the fact that the Fed made this adjustment practically preemptively – the o/n RRP facility is not being used at the moment, so there are no capacity constraints yet, while repo and bill yields aren’t trading negative yet –suggests that the Fed is “foaming the runway” for the end of SLR exemption.\"Knowing well this would be a very hot button issue for the market, the Fed published thefollowing statementto ease trader nerves, noting that while the SLR special treatment will expire on March 31, the Fed is \"inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications\" and furthermore, \"Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability\" - in short, if yields spike, the Fed will re-introduce the SLR without delay:The Federal Reserve Board on Friday announced that the temporary change to its supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for bank holding companies will expire as scheduled on March 31. Additionally, the Board will shortly seek comment on measures to adjust the SLR. The Board will take appropriate actions to assure that any changes to the SLR do not erode the overall strength of bank capital requirements.To ease strains in the Treasury market resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to promote lending to households and businesses, the Board temporarily modified the SLR last year to exclude U.S. Treasury securities and central bank reserves. Since that time, the Treasury market has stabilized. However, because of recent growth in the supply of central bank reserves and the issuance of Treasury securities, the Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability.To ensure that the SLR—which was established in 2014 as an additional capital requirement—remains effective in an environment of higher reserves, the Board will soon be inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications.The proposal and comments will contribute to ongoing discussions with the Department of the Treasury and other regulators on future work to ensure the resiliency of the Treasury market.The Fed's soothing wods notwithstanding,having been primed for a favorable outcome, the Fed's disappointing announcement was hardly the news traders were hoping for and stocks tumbled...Bond yields spiked...... while the stock of JPM, which is the most exposed bank to SLR relief (as noted yesterday in \"Facing Up To JP Morgan's Leverage Relief Threats\")....... slumped.In case you've been living under a rock, here's why you should care about the SLR decision: First, for those whomissed our primer on the issue, some background from JPM (ironically the one bank that has the most to lose from the Fed's decision) the bottom line is that without SLR relief,banks may have to delever, raise new capital, halt buybacks, sell preferred stock, turn down deposits and generally push back on reserves (not necessarily all of these, and not in that order) just as the Fed is injecting hundreds of billions of reserves into the market as the Treasury depletes its TGA account.The massive expansion of the Fed’s balance that has occurred implied an equally massive growth in bank reserves held at Federal Reserve banks. The expiration of the regulatory relief would add ~$2.1tn of leverage exposure across the 8 GSIBs. As well, TGA reduction and continued QE could add another ~$2.35tn of deposits to the system during 2021.While the expiry of the carve-out on March 31 would not have an immediate impact on GSIBs, the continued increase in leverage assets throughout the course of the year would increase long-term debt (LTD) and preferred requirements. Here, JPM takes an optimistic view and writes that\"even the “worst” case issuance scenario as very manageable, with LTD needs of $35bn for TLAC requirements and preferred needs of $15-$20bn to maintain the industry-wide SLR at 5.6%.The constraint is greater at the bank entity, where the capacity to grow leverage exposure to be ~$765bn at 6.2% SLR.\"Goldman's take was more troubling: the bank estimated that under the continued QE regime, there would be a shortfall of some $2 trillion in reserve capacity, mainly in the form of deposits which the banks would be unable to accept as part of ongoing QE (much more in Goldman'sfull take of the SLR quandary).So what happens next?Addressing this topic, yesterday Curvature's Scott Skyrm wrote that \"the largest banks are enjoying much larger balance sheets, but there are political factors in Washington that are against an extension of the exemption.... Here are a couple of scenarios and their implications on the Repo market:The exemption is extended 3 months or 6 months - No impact on the Repo market. It's already fully priced-in.The exemption is continued for reserves, but ended for Treasurys. Since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise. Volatility increases as Repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants.The exemption is ended for both reserves and Treasurys. Same as above.In other words, Skyrm has a relatively downbeat view, warning that \"since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise.\" Additionally, volatility is likely to increase as repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants...Perhaps a bit too draconian? Well, last week, JPMorgan laid out 5 scenarios for SLR, of which two predicted the end of SLR relief on March 31, as follow:3. Relief ends March 31, banks fully raise capital Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates 4. Relief ends March 31, banks raise capital & de-lever Impact on BanksRatesFront-End RatesGoing back to Zoltan, let's recallthat the repo gurualso cautioned that \"ending the exemption of reserves and Treasuries from the calculation of the SLR may mean that U.S. banks will turn away deposits and reserves on the margin (not Treasuries) to leave more room for market-making activities,and these flows will swell further money funds’ inflows coming from TGA drawdowns.\"More importantly, Zoltan does not expect broad chaos in repo or broader markets, and instead provides a more benign view on the negligible impact the SLR has had (and will be if it is eliminated), as he explained in a note from Tuesday.How to determine if Zoltan's benign view is correct? He concluded his note by writing that \"given that our call for a zero-to-negative FRA-OIS spread by the end of June was predicated on the end of SLR extension and an assumption that the Fed will try to fix a quantity problem with prices, not quantities, today’s adjustments mean that FRA-OIS won’t trade all the way down to zero or negative territory.\"FRA-OIS from here will be a function of how tight FX swaps will trade relative to OIS, but Treasury bills trading at deeply sub-zero rates is no longer a risk...While Bills have occasionally dipped into the negative territory on occasion, so far they have avoided a fullblown plunge into NIRP, which may be just the positive sign the market is waiting for to ease the nerves associated with the sudden and largely unexpected end of the SLR exemption.* *  *Finally, for those curious what the immediate market impact will be, NatWest strategist Blake Gwinn writes that the Fed announcement that they’re letting regulatory exemptions for banks expire at the end of the month \"really threads the needle and \"assuages concerns about the potential long-term impact on the markets\" asthe SLR \"ends it but defuses a lot of the knee-jerk market reaction” by pledging to address the current design and calibration of the supplementary leverage ratio to prevent strains from developing.“I was never worried about a day-one bank puke of Treasuries or drawdown in repo or anything like that on no renewal,” Gwinn said. “My concern was the longer run,” like as reserves continue to rise, would the SLR “become a nuisance and drag on Treasuries and spreads” Gwinn concludes that with the statement, the Fed is\"really speaking to those fears and basically saying, ‘don’t worry, we are on it’.”Well, with yields spiking to HOD in early quad-witch trading, the market sure seems quite skeptical that the Fed is on anything.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1103,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":324144597,"gmtCreate":1615978236319,"gmtModify":1704789193489,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574684026781296","idStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like me pls","listText":"Like me pls","text":"Like me pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/324144597","repostId":"1108353316","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1108353316","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1615977527,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1108353316?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-17 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Kingsoft Cloud EPS beats by $0.17, misses on revenue","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1108353316","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"(March 17) Kingsoft Cloud Q4 GAAP EPS of $0.00 beats by $0.17.Revenue of $294.7Mmisses by $1.41M.Adj","content":"<p>(March 17)&nbsp;Kingsoft Cloud Q4 GAAP EPS of $0.00&nbsp;beats by $0.17.</p><p>Revenue of $294.7Mmisses by $1.41M.</p><p>Adjusted EBITDA margin of -0.9% vs. -7.6% in last year's quarter.</p><p>Gross margin improved Y/Y to 4.8% from 4.6%.</p><p><b>Fourth quarter 2020 Financial Results</b></p><p>Kingsoft Cloud&nbsp;Total Revenues reached RMB1,922.7 million (US$294.7 million), representing an increase of 63.8% from RMB1,173.6 million in the same period of 2019. The increases were primarily due to the growth in both public cloud services and enterprise cloud services for our premium customers.</p><ul><li>Revenues from public cloud services were RMB1,361.5 million (US$208.7 million), representing an increase of 44.1% from RMB945.1 million in the same period of 2019.</li><li>Revenues from enterprise cloud services were RMB535.9 million (US$82.1 million), representing an increase of 143.1% from RMB220.4 million in the same period of 2019.</li><li>Other revenues were RMB25.3 million (US$3.9 million).</li></ul><p>Gross profit was RMB92.6 million (US$14.2 million), compared to RMB54.3 million in the same period of 2019. Gross margin was 4.8%, compared to 4.6% in the same period of 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP gross profit was RMB94.9 million (US$14.5 million), compared to RMB56.7 million in the same period of 2019. Non-GAAP gross margin was 4.9%, compared to 4.8% in the same period of 2019. The increase was primarily due to our continued leverage on economies of scale and the costs savings, which is offset by the investment into new business opportunities of strategic verticals, and costs incurred for ongoing projects.</p><p>Net loss was RMB105.2 million (US$16.1 million), compared with RMB239.5 million in the same quarter of 2019. The net margin significantly increased to -5.5% from -20.4% in the same quarter of 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP net loss was RMB174.3 million (US$26.7 million), compared with RMB254.6 million in the same quarter of 2019. The Non-GAAP net margin significantly increased to -9.1% from -21.7% in the same quarter of 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP EBITDA was RMB-17.5 million (US$-2.7 million), compared with RMB-89.3 million in the same quarter of 2019. Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was -0.9%, compared to -7.6% in the same quarter of 2019. The steady increase of Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was due to the revenue growth and operating leverage.</p><p>Basic and diluted net loss per share was RMB0.03 (US$0.00), compared with RMB0.32 in the same quarter of 2019.</p><p>Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments were RMB6,117.7 million (US$937.6 million) as of December 31, 2020, compared to RMB2,248.7 million as of December 31, 2019.</p><p>Outstanding ordinary shares were 3,339,618,633 as of December 31, 2020, equivalent to about 222,641,242 ADSs.</p><p><b>Fiscal Year 2020 Financial Results</b></p><p>Total Revenues reached RMB6,577.3 million (US$1,008.0 million), representing an increase of 66.2% from RMB3,956.4 million in 2019. The increases were primarily due to the growth in both public cloud services and enterprise cloud services for our premium customers.</p><ul><li>Revenues from public cloud services were RMB5,166.9 million (US$791.9 million), representing an increase of 49.4% from RMB3,458.8 million in 2019.</li><li>Revenues from enterprise cloud services were RMB1,372.7 million (US$210.4 million), representing an increase of 182.3% from RMB486.3 million in 2019.</li><li>Other revenues were RMB37.7 million (US$5.7 million).</li></ul><p>Cost of revenues was RMB6,220.3 million (US$953.3 million), representing an increase of 57.5% from RMB3,948.6 million in 2019, primarily attributable to the rapid growth of our business. IDC costs increased by 42.1% to RMB4,058.8 million (US$622.0 million) from RMB2,856.6 million in 2019. The increase in IDC costs was in line with the Company’s expanding business and was partially offset by improved efficiency and utilization of bandwidth. IDC costs as a percentage of total revenues decreased from 72.2% during the same period of last year to 61.7% in 2020. Depreciation and amortization costs were RMB746.2 million (US$114.4 million), compared with RMB599.2 million in 2019.</p><p>Gross profit increased to RMB357.0 million (US$54.7 million), from RMB7.7 million in 2019. Gross margin was 5.4%, compared to 0.2% in 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP gross profit increased to RMB367.6 million (US$56.3 million), from RMB16.2 million in 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP gross margin was 5.6%, compared to 0.4% in 2019. The increase was primarily due to our continued leverage on economies of scale and the costs savings.</p><p>Net loss was RMB962.2 million (US$147.5 million), compared with RMB1,111.2 million in 2019. The net margin significantly increased to -14.6% from -28.1% in the same quarter of 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP net loss was RMB824.4 million (US$126.3 million), compared with RMB957.6 million in 2019. The Non-GAAP net margin significantly increased to -12.5% from -24.2% in 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP EBITDA was RMB-119.1 million (US$-18.3 million), compared with RMB-417.7 million in 2019. Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was -1.8%, compared to -10.6% in 2019. The steady increase of Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was due to the revenue growth and operating leverage.</p><p>Basic and diluted net loss per share was RMB0.41 (US$0.06), compared with RMB1.31 in 2019.</p><p><b>Business Outlook</b></p><p>For the first quarter of 2021, the Company expects total revenues to be between RMB1.83 billion and RMB1.93 billion. It is based on the Company’s current and preliminary views on the market and operational conditions, which are subject to change. The forecast reflects the relative late timing of Chinese Lunar New Year Holiday in the first quarter of 2021 compared with 2020, and the typical pattern of procurement and implementation process of major enterprises and public sector clients in mainland China in the first quarter each year.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Kingsoft Cloud EPS beats by $0.17, misses on revenue</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nKingsoft Cloud EPS beats by $0.17, misses on revenue\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-03-17 18:38</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(March 17)&nbsp;Kingsoft Cloud Q4 GAAP EPS of $0.00&nbsp;beats by $0.17.</p><p>Revenue of $294.7Mmisses by $1.41M.</p><p>Adjusted EBITDA margin of -0.9% vs. -7.6% in last year's quarter.</p><p>Gross margin improved Y/Y to 4.8% from 4.6%.</p><p><b>Fourth quarter 2020 Financial Results</b></p><p>Kingsoft Cloud&nbsp;Total Revenues reached RMB1,922.7 million (US$294.7 million), representing an increase of 63.8% from RMB1,173.6 million in the same period of 2019. The increases were primarily due to the growth in both public cloud services and enterprise cloud services for our premium customers.</p><ul><li>Revenues from public cloud services were RMB1,361.5 million (US$208.7 million), representing an increase of 44.1% from RMB945.1 million in the same period of 2019.</li><li>Revenues from enterprise cloud services were RMB535.9 million (US$82.1 million), representing an increase of 143.1% from RMB220.4 million in the same period of 2019.</li><li>Other revenues were RMB25.3 million (US$3.9 million).</li></ul><p>Gross profit was RMB92.6 million (US$14.2 million), compared to RMB54.3 million in the same period of 2019. Gross margin was 4.8%, compared to 4.6% in the same period of 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP gross profit was RMB94.9 million (US$14.5 million), compared to RMB56.7 million in the same period of 2019. Non-GAAP gross margin was 4.9%, compared to 4.8% in the same period of 2019. The increase was primarily due to our continued leverage on economies of scale and the costs savings, which is offset by the investment into new business opportunities of strategic verticals, and costs incurred for ongoing projects.</p><p>Net loss was RMB105.2 million (US$16.1 million), compared with RMB239.5 million in the same quarter of 2019. The net margin significantly increased to -5.5% from -20.4% in the same quarter of 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP net loss was RMB174.3 million (US$26.7 million), compared with RMB254.6 million in the same quarter of 2019. The Non-GAAP net margin significantly increased to -9.1% from -21.7% in the same quarter of 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP EBITDA was RMB-17.5 million (US$-2.7 million), compared with RMB-89.3 million in the same quarter of 2019. Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was -0.9%, compared to -7.6% in the same quarter of 2019. The steady increase of Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was due to the revenue growth and operating leverage.</p><p>Basic and diluted net loss per share was RMB0.03 (US$0.00), compared with RMB0.32 in the same quarter of 2019.</p><p>Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments were RMB6,117.7 million (US$937.6 million) as of December 31, 2020, compared to RMB2,248.7 million as of December 31, 2019.</p><p>Outstanding ordinary shares were 3,339,618,633 as of December 31, 2020, equivalent to about 222,641,242 ADSs.</p><p><b>Fiscal Year 2020 Financial Results</b></p><p>Total Revenues reached RMB6,577.3 million (US$1,008.0 million), representing an increase of 66.2% from RMB3,956.4 million in 2019. The increases were primarily due to the growth in both public cloud services and enterprise cloud services for our premium customers.</p><ul><li>Revenues from public cloud services were RMB5,166.9 million (US$791.9 million), representing an increase of 49.4% from RMB3,458.8 million in 2019.</li><li>Revenues from enterprise cloud services were RMB1,372.7 million (US$210.4 million), representing an increase of 182.3% from RMB486.3 million in 2019.</li><li>Other revenues were RMB37.7 million (US$5.7 million).</li></ul><p>Cost of revenues was RMB6,220.3 million (US$953.3 million), representing an increase of 57.5% from RMB3,948.6 million in 2019, primarily attributable to the rapid growth of our business. IDC costs increased by 42.1% to RMB4,058.8 million (US$622.0 million) from RMB2,856.6 million in 2019. The increase in IDC costs was in line with the Company’s expanding business and was partially offset by improved efficiency and utilization of bandwidth. IDC costs as a percentage of total revenues decreased from 72.2% during the same period of last year to 61.7% in 2020. Depreciation and amortization costs were RMB746.2 million (US$114.4 million), compared with RMB599.2 million in 2019.</p><p>Gross profit increased to RMB357.0 million (US$54.7 million), from RMB7.7 million in 2019. Gross margin was 5.4%, compared to 0.2% in 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP gross profit increased to RMB367.6 million (US$56.3 million), from RMB16.2 million in 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP gross margin was 5.6%, compared to 0.4% in 2019. The increase was primarily due to our continued leverage on economies of scale and the costs savings.</p><p>Net loss was RMB962.2 million (US$147.5 million), compared with RMB1,111.2 million in 2019. The net margin significantly increased to -14.6% from -28.1% in the same quarter of 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP net loss was RMB824.4 million (US$126.3 million), compared with RMB957.6 million in 2019. The Non-GAAP net margin significantly increased to -12.5% from -24.2% in 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP EBITDA was RMB-119.1 million (US$-18.3 million), compared with RMB-417.7 million in 2019. Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was -1.8%, compared to -10.6% in 2019. The steady increase of Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was due to the revenue growth and operating leverage.</p><p>Basic and diluted net loss per share was RMB0.41 (US$0.06), compared with RMB1.31 in 2019.</p><p><b>Business Outlook</b></p><p>For the first quarter of 2021, the Company expects total revenues to be between RMB1.83 billion and RMB1.93 billion. It is based on the Company’s current and preliminary views on the market and operational conditions, which are subject to change. The forecast reflects the relative late timing of Chinese Lunar New Year Holiday in the first quarter of 2021 compared with 2020, and the typical pattern of procurement and implementation process of major enterprises and public sector clients in mainland China in the first quarter each year.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"KC":"金山云"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1108353316","content_text":"(March 17) Kingsoft Cloud Q4 GAAP EPS of $0.00 beats by $0.17.Revenue of $294.7Mmisses by $1.41M.Adjusted EBITDA margin of -0.9% vs. -7.6% in last year's quarter.Gross margin improved Y/Y to 4.8% from 4.6%.Fourth quarter 2020 Financial ResultsKingsoft Cloud Total Revenues reached RMB1,922.7 million (US$294.7 million), representing an increase of 63.8% from RMB1,173.6 million in the same period of 2019. The increases were primarily due to the growth in both public cloud services and enterprise cloud services for our premium customers.Revenues from public cloud services were RMB1,361.5 million (US$208.7 million), representing an increase of 44.1% from RMB945.1 million in the same period of 2019.Revenues from enterprise cloud services were RMB535.9 million (US$82.1 million), representing an increase of 143.1% from RMB220.4 million in the same period of 2019.Other revenues were RMB25.3 million (US$3.9 million).Gross profit was RMB92.6 million (US$14.2 million), compared to RMB54.3 million in the same period of 2019. Gross margin was 4.8%, compared to 4.6% in the same period of 2019.Non-GAAP gross profit was RMB94.9 million (US$14.5 million), compared to RMB56.7 million in the same period of 2019. Non-GAAP gross margin was 4.9%, compared to 4.8% in the same period of 2019. The increase was primarily due to our continued leverage on economies of scale and the costs savings, which is offset by the investment into new business opportunities of strategic verticals, and costs incurred for ongoing projects.Net loss was RMB105.2 million (US$16.1 million), compared with RMB239.5 million in the same quarter of 2019. The net margin significantly increased to -5.5% from -20.4% in the same quarter of 2019.Non-GAAP net loss was RMB174.3 million (US$26.7 million), compared with RMB254.6 million in the same quarter of 2019. The Non-GAAP net margin significantly increased to -9.1% from -21.7% in the same quarter of 2019.Non-GAAP EBITDA was RMB-17.5 million (US$-2.7 million), compared with RMB-89.3 million in the same quarter of 2019. Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was -0.9%, compared to -7.6% in the same quarter of 2019. The steady increase of Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was due to the revenue growth and operating leverage.Basic and diluted net loss per share was RMB0.03 (US$0.00), compared with RMB0.32 in the same quarter of 2019.Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments were RMB6,117.7 million (US$937.6 million) as of December 31, 2020, compared to RMB2,248.7 million as of December 31, 2019.Outstanding ordinary shares were 3,339,618,633 as of December 31, 2020, equivalent to about 222,641,242 ADSs.Fiscal Year 2020 Financial ResultsTotal Revenues reached RMB6,577.3 million (US$1,008.0 million), representing an increase of 66.2% from RMB3,956.4 million in 2019. The increases were primarily due to the growth in both public cloud services and enterprise cloud services for our premium customers.Revenues from public cloud services were RMB5,166.9 million (US$791.9 million), representing an increase of 49.4% from RMB3,458.8 million in 2019.Revenues from enterprise cloud services were RMB1,372.7 million (US$210.4 million), representing an increase of 182.3% from RMB486.3 million in 2019.Other revenues were RMB37.7 million (US$5.7 million).Cost of revenues was RMB6,220.3 million (US$953.3 million), representing an increase of 57.5% from RMB3,948.6 million in 2019, primarily attributable to the rapid growth of our business. IDC costs increased by 42.1% to RMB4,058.8 million (US$622.0 million) from RMB2,856.6 million in 2019. The increase in IDC costs was in line with the Company’s expanding business and was partially offset by improved efficiency and utilization of bandwidth. IDC costs as a percentage of total revenues decreased from 72.2% during the same period of last year to 61.7% in 2020. Depreciation and amortization costs were RMB746.2 million (US$114.4 million), compared with RMB599.2 million in 2019.Gross profit increased to RMB357.0 million (US$54.7 million), from RMB7.7 million in 2019. Gross margin was 5.4%, compared to 0.2% in 2019.Non-GAAP gross profit increased to RMB367.6 million (US$56.3 million), from RMB16.2 million in 2019.Non-GAAP gross margin was 5.6%, compared to 0.4% in 2019. The increase was primarily due to our continued leverage on economies of scale and the costs savings.Net loss was RMB962.2 million (US$147.5 million), compared with RMB1,111.2 million in 2019. The net margin significantly increased to -14.6% from -28.1% in the same quarter of 2019.Non-GAAP net loss was RMB824.4 million (US$126.3 million), compared with RMB957.6 million in 2019. The Non-GAAP net margin significantly increased to -12.5% from -24.2% in 2019.Non-GAAP EBITDA was RMB-119.1 million (US$-18.3 million), compared with RMB-417.7 million in 2019. Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was -1.8%, compared to -10.6% in 2019. The steady increase of Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was due to the revenue growth and operating leverage.Basic and diluted net loss per share was RMB0.41 (US$0.06), compared with RMB1.31 in 2019.Business OutlookFor the first quarter of 2021, the Company expects total revenues to be between RMB1.83 billion and RMB1.93 billion. It is based on the Company’s current and preliminary views on the market and operational conditions, which are subject to change. The forecast reflects the relative late timing of Chinese Lunar New Year Holiday in the first quarter of 2021 compared with 2020, and the typical pattern of procurement and implementation process of major enterprises and public sector clients in mainland China in the first quarter each year.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"KC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1163,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325382584,"gmtCreate":1615865107748,"gmtModify":1704787652705,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574684026781296","idStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Pls rpely to me","listText":"Pls rpely to me","text":"Pls rpely to me","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/325382584","repostId":"1118245575","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1092,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":322917665,"gmtCreate":1615767185957,"gmtModify":1704786152577,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574684026781296","idStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Pls likemt comment","listText":"Pls likemt comment","text":"Pls likemt comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/322917665","repostId":"1199092369","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1185,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":328768428,"gmtCreate":1615560442364,"gmtModify":1704784582714,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574684026781296","idStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/328768428","repostId":"1114808605","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1236,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":321226886,"gmtCreate":1615441629145,"gmtModify":1704782813777,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574684026781296","idStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Pls reply to my comment thank u","listText":"Pls reply to my comment thank u","text":"Pls reply to my comment thank u","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/321226886","repostId":"1168853647","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1168853647","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1615436750,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1168853647?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-11 12:25","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Is Alibaba Stock A Buy Right Now? Here's What Earnings, Chart Show","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1168853647","media":"investors","summary":"libaba stock has fallen more than 25% off its high despite compelling fundamentals. The stock looks ","content":"<p>libaba stock has fallen more than 25% off its high despite compelling fundamentals. The stock looks like it's on sale now, but is BABA stock a buy right now?</p>\n<p>Sellers were in<b>Alibaba</b>(BABA) on Feb. 2 as Wall Street weighed its latestearnings report.</p>\n<p>Adjusted earnings rose 30% to $3.38 a share. Revenue growth accelerated for the third straight quarter, jumping 46% to $33.87 billion. Revenue for the company's cloud computing business grew 50% year over year to $2.47 billion.</p>\n<p>\"Our cloud computing business continues to expand market leadership and show strong growth, reflecting the massive potential of China's nascent cloud computing market as well as our years of investment in technology,\" Alibaba CEO Daniel Zhang said in a press release.</p>\n<p>Alibaba stock jumped 3.5% on Feb. 3 after the company's fintech arm, Ant Group, struck a deal with Chinese regulators to restructure and become a financial holding company. Ant Group operates a suite of financial products, including the widely used Alipay digital wallet in China.</p>\n<p><b>Sellers Hit BABA Stock</b></p>\n<p>Sellers knocked Alibaba stock lower on Nov. 3 after the $34.5 billion Ant Group IPO was suspended in Shanghai and Hong Kong. The decision to suspend the IPO came after Shanghai exchange officials said it would halt the listing due to the company's inability to fulfill conditions amid changes in the regulatory environment.</p>\n<p>Sellers were in Alibaba stock again on Nov. 5 after the companyreported earnings and missed on sales.</p>\n<p>BABA stock crashed another 8% on Nov. 10 after Chinese regulators announced new draft antimonopoly rules for China online platforms like Alibaba and<b>JD.com</b>(JD), among others. It's had a hard time attracting buyers since then.</p>\n<p><b>Alibaba Stock Fundamental Analysis</b></p>\n<p>With a five-year annualized&nbsp; earnings growth rate of 29% and a sales growth rate of 47%, it's hard to find a company with a more impressive track record of growth than Alibaba. It's been a big winner since its IPO in September 2014.</p>\n<p>Expectations were high for Alibaba's Singles Day annual shopping event in November, and the company didn't disappoint as sales nearly doubled from the year-ago period to $74 billion.</p>\n<p>The company has been able to stay in growth mode despite a slowdown in its core e-commerce business.</p>\n<p>Alibaba's business in China looks a lot like Amazon's in the U.S. Alibaba'scloud-computing businessis showing solid growth, just like Amazon's booming web services business.</p>\n<p>Alibaba also sees dollar signs in food delivery. In 2018, it merged its food delivery service Ele.me with its lifestyle app Koubei to better compete with<b>Tencent</b>(TCEHY)-owned Meituan.</p>\n<p>Sales at Alibaba's digital media and entertainment unit are also rising. The unit includes Alibaba's videostreaming platform Youku, along with its music streaming service, Xiami. Alibaba also has a licensing agreement with<b>Walt Disney</b>(DIS) unit Buena Vista International, giving it access to a large amount of Disney content.</p>\n<p>And just like Amazon, Alibaba sees potential in the sports streaming market. In 2018, the company partnered with China Central Television and streamed all matches of the 2018 FIFA World Cup. Alibaba said the World Cup, as well as continued investment in original content, fueled daily average subscriber growth of 200% for Youku.</p>\n<p><b>Top-Rated Stock</b></p>\n<p>Alibaba's&nbsp;Composite Ratingof 63 (scale of 1-99 with 99 being the best) has been hurt by sluggish price performance in recent months.</p>\n<p>Still, for a megacap stock, Alibaba continues to deliver torrid growth. But earnings and sales growth slowed dramatically in May, hurt by the coronavirus outbreak. Adjusted profit inched up 2% year over year to $1.30 a share. But that was well above the consensus estimate of 85 cents. Revenue increased 16% to just over $16.14 billion, also above expectations of $15.1 billion.</p>\n<p>But earnings and sales growth accelerated nicely when the company reported earnings in August. Quarterly profit increased 15%, with revenue up 30% to $21.76 billion.</p>\n<p>Alibaba breaks down its revenue into four segments: Core Commerce, Cloud Computing, Digital Media and Entertainment and Innovation Initiatives. Core commerce revenue jumped 34% to $18.9 billion. Cloud computing revenue increased 59% to $1.75 billion.</p>\n<p>Mobile monthly active users totaled 874 million, up 15.8% from the year-ago quarter and 3.3% sequentially.</p>\n<p><b>Top Fundamentals</b></p>\n<p>Annual return on equity of 21% and pretax margin of 31.3% help its top-notchSMR Rating(sales + margins + return on equity) of A fromIBD Stock Checkup.&nbsp;With Stock Checkup, you can easily see who the group leaders are based on a combination of fundamental and technical factors.</p>\n<p>For its current fiscal year 2021,earnings per shareare expected to jump 38%, with 15% growth seen in fiscal 2022.</p>\n<p><b>Etsy</b>(ETSY) is a top-rated stock in IBD's internet retail group, according to IBD Stock Checkup, along with China-based<b>JD.com</b>(JD),<b>Vipshop</b>(VIPS) and<b>Shutterstock</b>(SSTK).</p>\n<p><b>Alibaba Stock Technical Analysis</b></p>\n<p>After a heavy volume breakout for Alibaba stock in late November 2019, thecoronavirus stock market crashbrought sellers into the stock. But Alibaba, a member of IBD'sLong-Term Leadersportfolio, soared out of a 24-week consolidation in July.</p>\n<p>A 36% pullback for Alibaba stock in the second half of 2018 shook out a lot of sellers in the stock and ultimately served toreset the base count.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e27938fbb38634242f13196ad341bed4\" tg-width=\"1162\" tg-height=\"586\"></p>\n<p>Alibaba broke out of aflat basewith a 268.10 buy point during the week ended Aug. 28. It rallied for a bit, then started to pull back with the broad market. A new flat base formed with a 299.10 buy point, although an early entry was seen when Alibaba stock gapped up on Sept. 30.</p>\n<p><b>Improving RS Line</b></p>\n<p>Alibaba stock has been on a sharp downtrend since hitting a high of 319.32 in late October.</p>\n<p>Alibaba'srelative strength linehas also been trending sharply lower. A stock's relative strength line, found in daily and weekly charts atinvestors.com, compares the stock's daily price performance to the S&amp;P 500. An upward-sloping RS line means the stock is outperforming the S&amp;P 500. A downward-sloping line means the stock is lagging the S&amp;P 500.</p>\n<p><b>The bottom line</b>: With Alibaba stock still far off its high and below its recently converged 50-day and 200-day moving average lines, Alibaba is not a buy now because it still hasoverhead supplyto work through.</p>\n<p>Risk averse investors will wait and see if Alibaba can get back into rally mode and fully form the right side of abase. Renewed signs of institutional buying would help the stock's cause, but there aren't any signs of it yet. An early entry would be seen if Alibaba stock can move above its recent high of 274.29.</p>","source":"lsy1610449120050","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Is Alibaba Stock A Buy Right Now? Here's What Earnings, Chart Show</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nIs Alibaba Stock A Buy Right Now? Here's What Earnings, Chart Show\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-11 12:25 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.investors.com/research/alibaba-stock-buy-now/?src=A00220><strong>investors</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>libaba stock has fallen more than 25% off its high despite compelling fundamentals. The stock looks like it's on sale now, but is BABA stock a buy right now?\nSellers were inAlibaba(BABA) on Feb. 2 as ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.investors.com/research/alibaba-stock-buy-now/?src=A00220\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09988":"阿里巴巴-W","BABA":"阿里巴巴"},"source_url":"https://www.investors.com/research/alibaba-stock-buy-now/?src=A00220","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1168853647","content_text":"libaba stock has fallen more than 25% off its high despite compelling fundamentals. The stock looks like it's on sale now, but is BABA stock a buy right now?\nSellers were inAlibaba(BABA) on Feb. 2 as Wall Street weighed its latestearnings report.\nAdjusted earnings rose 30% to $3.38 a share. Revenue growth accelerated for the third straight quarter, jumping 46% to $33.87 billion. Revenue for the company's cloud computing business grew 50% year over year to $2.47 billion.\n\"Our cloud computing business continues to expand market leadership and show strong growth, reflecting the massive potential of China's nascent cloud computing market as well as our years of investment in technology,\" Alibaba CEO Daniel Zhang said in a press release.\nAlibaba stock jumped 3.5% on Feb. 3 after the company's fintech arm, Ant Group, struck a deal with Chinese regulators to restructure and become a financial holding company. Ant Group operates a suite of financial products, including the widely used Alipay digital wallet in China.\nSellers Hit BABA Stock\nSellers knocked Alibaba stock lower on Nov. 3 after the $34.5 billion Ant Group IPO was suspended in Shanghai and Hong Kong. The decision to suspend the IPO came after Shanghai exchange officials said it would halt the listing due to the company's inability to fulfill conditions amid changes in the regulatory environment.\nSellers were in Alibaba stock again on Nov. 5 after the companyreported earnings and missed on sales.\nBABA stock crashed another 8% on Nov. 10 after Chinese regulators announced new draft antimonopoly rules for China online platforms like Alibaba andJD.com(JD), among others. It's had a hard time attracting buyers since then.\nAlibaba Stock Fundamental Analysis\nWith a five-year annualized  earnings growth rate of 29% and a sales growth rate of 47%, it's hard to find a company with a more impressive track record of growth than Alibaba. It's been a big winner since its IPO in September 2014.\nExpectations were high for Alibaba's Singles Day annual shopping event in November, and the company didn't disappoint as sales nearly doubled from the year-ago period to $74 billion.\nThe company has been able to stay in growth mode despite a slowdown in its core e-commerce business.\nAlibaba's business in China looks a lot like Amazon's in the U.S. Alibaba'scloud-computing businessis showing solid growth, just like Amazon's booming web services business.\nAlibaba also sees dollar signs in food delivery. In 2018, it merged its food delivery service Ele.me with its lifestyle app Koubei to better compete withTencent(TCEHY)-owned Meituan.\nSales at Alibaba's digital media and entertainment unit are also rising. The unit includes Alibaba's videostreaming platform Youku, along with its music streaming service, Xiami. Alibaba also has a licensing agreement withWalt Disney(DIS) unit Buena Vista International, giving it access to a large amount of Disney content.\nAnd just like Amazon, Alibaba sees potential in the sports streaming market. In 2018, the company partnered with China Central Television and streamed all matches of the 2018 FIFA World Cup. Alibaba said the World Cup, as well as continued investment in original content, fueled daily average subscriber growth of 200% for Youku.\nTop-Rated Stock\nAlibaba's Composite Ratingof 63 (scale of 1-99 with 99 being the best) has been hurt by sluggish price performance in recent months.\nStill, for a megacap stock, Alibaba continues to deliver torrid growth. But earnings and sales growth slowed dramatically in May, hurt by the coronavirus outbreak. Adjusted profit inched up 2% year over year to $1.30 a share. But that was well above the consensus estimate of 85 cents. Revenue increased 16% to just over $16.14 billion, also above expectations of $15.1 billion.\nBut earnings and sales growth accelerated nicely when the company reported earnings in August. Quarterly profit increased 15%, with revenue up 30% to $21.76 billion.\nAlibaba breaks down its revenue into four segments: Core Commerce, Cloud Computing, Digital Media and Entertainment and Innovation Initiatives. Core commerce revenue jumped 34% to $18.9 billion. Cloud computing revenue increased 59% to $1.75 billion.\nMobile monthly active users totaled 874 million, up 15.8% from the year-ago quarter and 3.3% sequentially.\nTop Fundamentals\nAnnual return on equity of 21% and pretax margin of 31.3% help its top-notchSMR Rating(sales + margins + return on equity) of A fromIBD Stock Checkup. With Stock Checkup, you can easily see who the group leaders are based on a combination of fundamental and technical factors.\nFor its current fiscal year 2021,earnings per shareare expected to jump 38%, with 15% growth seen in fiscal 2022.\nEtsy(ETSY) is a top-rated stock in IBD's internet retail group, according to IBD Stock Checkup, along with China-basedJD.com(JD),Vipshop(VIPS) andShutterstock(SSTK).\nAlibaba Stock Technical Analysis\nAfter a heavy volume breakout for Alibaba stock in late November 2019, thecoronavirus stock market crashbrought sellers into the stock. But Alibaba, a member of IBD'sLong-Term Leadersportfolio, soared out of a 24-week consolidation in July.\nA 36% pullback for Alibaba stock in the second half of 2018 shook out a lot of sellers in the stock and ultimately served toreset the base count.\n\nAlibaba broke out of aflat basewith a 268.10 buy point during the week ended Aug. 28. It rallied for a bit, then started to pull back with the broad market. A new flat base formed with a 299.10 buy point, although an early entry was seen when Alibaba stock gapped up on Sept. 30.\nImproving RS Line\nAlibaba stock has been on a sharp downtrend since hitting a high of 319.32 in late October.\nAlibaba'srelative strength linehas also been trending sharply lower. A stock's relative strength line, found in daily and weekly charts atinvestors.com, compares the stock's daily price performance to the S&P 500. An upward-sloping RS line means the stock is outperforming the S&P 500. A downward-sloping line means the stock is lagging the S&P 500.\nThe bottom line: With Alibaba stock still far off its high and below its recently converged 50-day and 200-day moving average lines, Alibaba is not a buy now because it still hasoverhead supplyto work through.\nRisk averse investors will wait and see if Alibaba can get back into rally mode and fully form the right side of abase. Renewed signs of institutional buying would help the stock's cause, but there aren't any signs of it yet. An early entry would be seen if Alibaba stock can move above its recent high of 274.29.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"09988":0.9,"BABA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":917,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":323659098,"gmtCreate":1615339528114,"gmtModify":1704781347847,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574684026781296","idStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/323659098","repostId":"1146881306","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1152,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":329857803,"gmtCreate":1615224209602,"gmtModify":1704779876720,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574684026781296","idStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nuce","listText":"Nuce","text":"Nuce","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/329857803","repostId":"1199173220","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1147,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":320767990,"gmtCreate":1615179056810,"gmtModify":1704779172454,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3574684026781296","idStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/320767990","repostId":"2117651365","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1165,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":324144597,"gmtCreate":1615978236319,"gmtModify":1704789193489,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574684026781296","authorIdStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like me pls","listText":"Like me pls","text":"Like me pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":4,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/324144597","repostId":"1108353316","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1108353316","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1615977527,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1108353316?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-17 18:38","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Kingsoft Cloud EPS beats by $0.17, misses on revenue","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1108353316","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"(March 17) Kingsoft Cloud Q4 GAAP EPS of $0.00 beats by $0.17.Revenue of $294.7Mmisses by $1.41M.Adj","content":"<p>(March 17)&nbsp;Kingsoft Cloud Q4 GAAP EPS of $0.00&nbsp;beats by $0.17.</p><p>Revenue of $294.7Mmisses by $1.41M.</p><p>Adjusted EBITDA margin of -0.9% vs. -7.6% in last year's quarter.</p><p>Gross margin improved Y/Y to 4.8% from 4.6%.</p><p><b>Fourth quarter 2020 Financial Results</b></p><p>Kingsoft Cloud&nbsp;Total Revenues reached RMB1,922.7 million (US$294.7 million), representing an increase of 63.8% from RMB1,173.6 million in the same period of 2019. The increases were primarily due to the growth in both public cloud services and enterprise cloud services for our premium customers.</p><ul><li>Revenues from public cloud services were RMB1,361.5 million (US$208.7 million), representing an increase of 44.1% from RMB945.1 million in the same period of 2019.</li><li>Revenues from enterprise cloud services were RMB535.9 million (US$82.1 million), representing an increase of 143.1% from RMB220.4 million in the same period of 2019.</li><li>Other revenues were RMB25.3 million (US$3.9 million).</li></ul><p>Gross profit was RMB92.6 million (US$14.2 million), compared to RMB54.3 million in the same period of 2019. Gross margin was 4.8%, compared to 4.6% in the same period of 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP gross profit was RMB94.9 million (US$14.5 million), compared to RMB56.7 million in the same period of 2019. Non-GAAP gross margin was 4.9%, compared to 4.8% in the same period of 2019. The increase was primarily due to our continued leverage on economies of scale and the costs savings, which is offset by the investment into new business opportunities of strategic verticals, and costs incurred for ongoing projects.</p><p>Net loss was RMB105.2 million (US$16.1 million), compared with RMB239.5 million in the same quarter of 2019. The net margin significantly increased to -5.5% from -20.4% in the same quarter of 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP net loss was RMB174.3 million (US$26.7 million), compared with RMB254.6 million in the same quarter of 2019. The Non-GAAP net margin significantly increased to -9.1% from -21.7% in the same quarter of 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP EBITDA was RMB-17.5 million (US$-2.7 million), compared with RMB-89.3 million in the same quarter of 2019. Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was -0.9%, compared to -7.6% in the same quarter of 2019. The steady increase of Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was due to the revenue growth and operating leverage.</p><p>Basic and diluted net loss per share was RMB0.03 (US$0.00), compared with RMB0.32 in the same quarter of 2019.</p><p>Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments were RMB6,117.7 million (US$937.6 million) as of December 31, 2020, compared to RMB2,248.7 million as of December 31, 2019.</p><p>Outstanding ordinary shares were 3,339,618,633 as of December 31, 2020, equivalent to about 222,641,242 ADSs.</p><p><b>Fiscal Year 2020 Financial Results</b></p><p>Total Revenues reached RMB6,577.3 million (US$1,008.0 million), representing an increase of 66.2% from RMB3,956.4 million in 2019. The increases were primarily due to the growth in both public cloud services and enterprise cloud services for our premium customers.</p><ul><li>Revenues from public cloud services were RMB5,166.9 million (US$791.9 million), representing an increase of 49.4% from RMB3,458.8 million in 2019.</li><li>Revenues from enterprise cloud services were RMB1,372.7 million (US$210.4 million), representing an increase of 182.3% from RMB486.3 million in 2019.</li><li>Other revenues were RMB37.7 million (US$5.7 million).</li></ul><p>Cost of revenues was RMB6,220.3 million (US$953.3 million), representing an increase of 57.5% from RMB3,948.6 million in 2019, primarily attributable to the rapid growth of our business. IDC costs increased by 42.1% to RMB4,058.8 million (US$622.0 million) from RMB2,856.6 million in 2019. The increase in IDC costs was in line with the Company’s expanding business and was partially offset by improved efficiency and utilization of bandwidth. IDC costs as a percentage of total revenues decreased from 72.2% during the same period of last year to 61.7% in 2020. Depreciation and amortization costs were RMB746.2 million (US$114.4 million), compared with RMB599.2 million in 2019.</p><p>Gross profit increased to RMB357.0 million (US$54.7 million), from RMB7.7 million in 2019. Gross margin was 5.4%, compared to 0.2% in 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP gross profit increased to RMB367.6 million (US$56.3 million), from RMB16.2 million in 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP gross margin was 5.6%, compared to 0.4% in 2019. The increase was primarily due to our continued leverage on economies of scale and the costs savings.</p><p>Net loss was RMB962.2 million (US$147.5 million), compared with RMB1,111.2 million in 2019. The net margin significantly increased to -14.6% from -28.1% in the same quarter of 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP net loss was RMB824.4 million (US$126.3 million), compared with RMB957.6 million in 2019. The Non-GAAP net margin significantly increased to -12.5% from -24.2% in 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP EBITDA was RMB-119.1 million (US$-18.3 million), compared with RMB-417.7 million in 2019. Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was -1.8%, compared to -10.6% in 2019. The steady increase of Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was due to the revenue growth and operating leverage.</p><p>Basic and diluted net loss per share was RMB0.41 (US$0.06), compared with RMB1.31 in 2019.</p><p><b>Business Outlook</b></p><p>For the first quarter of 2021, the Company expects total revenues to be between RMB1.83 billion and RMB1.93 billion. It is based on the Company’s current and preliminary views on the market and operational conditions, which are subject to change. The forecast reflects the relative late timing of Chinese Lunar New Year Holiday in the first quarter of 2021 compared with 2020, and the typical pattern of procurement and implementation process of major enterprises and public sector clients in mainland China in the first quarter each year.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Kingsoft Cloud EPS beats by $0.17, misses on revenue</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nKingsoft Cloud EPS beats by $0.17, misses on revenue\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-03-17 18:38</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>(March 17)&nbsp;Kingsoft Cloud Q4 GAAP EPS of $0.00&nbsp;beats by $0.17.</p><p>Revenue of $294.7Mmisses by $1.41M.</p><p>Adjusted EBITDA margin of -0.9% vs. -7.6% in last year's quarter.</p><p>Gross margin improved Y/Y to 4.8% from 4.6%.</p><p><b>Fourth quarter 2020 Financial Results</b></p><p>Kingsoft Cloud&nbsp;Total Revenues reached RMB1,922.7 million (US$294.7 million), representing an increase of 63.8% from RMB1,173.6 million in the same period of 2019. The increases were primarily due to the growth in both public cloud services and enterprise cloud services for our premium customers.</p><ul><li>Revenues from public cloud services were RMB1,361.5 million (US$208.7 million), representing an increase of 44.1% from RMB945.1 million in the same period of 2019.</li><li>Revenues from enterprise cloud services were RMB535.9 million (US$82.1 million), representing an increase of 143.1% from RMB220.4 million in the same period of 2019.</li><li>Other revenues were RMB25.3 million (US$3.9 million).</li></ul><p>Gross profit was RMB92.6 million (US$14.2 million), compared to RMB54.3 million in the same period of 2019. Gross margin was 4.8%, compared to 4.6% in the same period of 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP gross profit was RMB94.9 million (US$14.5 million), compared to RMB56.7 million in the same period of 2019. Non-GAAP gross margin was 4.9%, compared to 4.8% in the same period of 2019. The increase was primarily due to our continued leverage on economies of scale and the costs savings, which is offset by the investment into new business opportunities of strategic verticals, and costs incurred for ongoing projects.</p><p>Net loss was RMB105.2 million (US$16.1 million), compared with RMB239.5 million in the same quarter of 2019. The net margin significantly increased to -5.5% from -20.4% in the same quarter of 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP net loss was RMB174.3 million (US$26.7 million), compared with RMB254.6 million in the same quarter of 2019. The Non-GAAP net margin significantly increased to -9.1% from -21.7% in the same quarter of 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP EBITDA was RMB-17.5 million (US$-2.7 million), compared with RMB-89.3 million in the same quarter of 2019. Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was -0.9%, compared to -7.6% in the same quarter of 2019. The steady increase of Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was due to the revenue growth and operating leverage.</p><p>Basic and diluted net loss per share was RMB0.03 (US$0.00), compared with RMB0.32 in the same quarter of 2019.</p><p>Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments were RMB6,117.7 million (US$937.6 million) as of December 31, 2020, compared to RMB2,248.7 million as of December 31, 2019.</p><p>Outstanding ordinary shares were 3,339,618,633 as of December 31, 2020, equivalent to about 222,641,242 ADSs.</p><p><b>Fiscal Year 2020 Financial Results</b></p><p>Total Revenues reached RMB6,577.3 million (US$1,008.0 million), representing an increase of 66.2% from RMB3,956.4 million in 2019. The increases were primarily due to the growth in both public cloud services and enterprise cloud services for our premium customers.</p><ul><li>Revenues from public cloud services were RMB5,166.9 million (US$791.9 million), representing an increase of 49.4% from RMB3,458.8 million in 2019.</li><li>Revenues from enterprise cloud services were RMB1,372.7 million (US$210.4 million), representing an increase of 182.3% from RMB486.3 million in 2019.</li><li>Other revenues were RMB37.7 million (US$5.7 million).</li></ul><p>Cost of revenues was RMB6,220.3 million (US$953.3 million), representing an increase of 57.5% from RMB3,948.6 million in 2019, primarily attributable to the rapid growth of our business. IDC costs increased by 42.1% to RMB4,058.8 million (US$622.0 million) from RMB2,856.6 million in 2019. The increase in IDC costs was in line with the Company’s expanding business and was partially offset by improved efficiency and utilization of bandwidth. IDC costs as a percentage of total revenues decreased from 72.2% during the same period of last year to 61.7% in 2020. Depreciation and amortization costs were RMB746.2 million (US$114.4 million), compared with RMB599.2 million in 2019.</p><p>Gross profit increased to RMB357.0 million (US$54.7 million), from RMB7.7 million in 2019. Gross margin was 5.4%, compared to 0.2% in 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP gross profit increased to RMB367.6 million (US$56.3 million), from RMB16.2 million in 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP gross margin was 5.6%, compared to 0.4% in 2019. The increase was primarily due to our continued leverage on economies of scale and the costs savings.</p><p>Net loss was RMB962.2 million (US$147.5 million), compared with RMB1,111.2 million in 2019. The net margin significantly increased to -14.6% from -28.1% in the same quarter of 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP net loss was RMB824.4 million (US$126.3 million), compared with RMB957.6 million in 2019. The Non-GAAP net margin significantly increased to -12.5% from -24.2% in 2019.</p><p>Non-GAAP EBITDA was RMB-119.1 million (US$-18.3 million), compared with RMB-417.7 million in 2019. Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was -1.8%, compared to -10.6% in 2019. The steady increase of Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was due to the revenue growth and operating leverage.</p><p>Basic and diluted net loss per share was RMB0.41 (US$0.06), compared with RMB1.31 in 2019.</p><p><b>Business Outlook</b></p><p>For the first quarter of 2021, the Company expects total revenues to be between RMB1.83 billion and RMB1.93 billion. It is based on the Company’s current and preliminary views on the market and operational conditions, which are subject to change. The forecast reflects the relative late timing of Chinese Lunar New Year Holiday in the first quarter of 2021 compared with 2020, and the typical pattern of procurement and implementation process of major enterprises and public sector clients in mainland China in the first quarter each year.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"KC":"金山云"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1108353316","content_text":"(March 17) Kingsoft Cloud Q4 GAAP EPS of $0.00 beats by $0.17.Revenue of $294.7Mmisses by $1.41M.Adjusted EBITDA margin of -0.9% vs. -7.6% in last year's quarter.Gross margin improved Y/Y to 4.8% from 4.6%.Fourth quarter 2020 Financial ResultsKingsoft Cloud Total Revenues reached RMB1,922.7 million (US$294.7 million), representing an increase of 63.8% from RMB1,173.6 million in the same period of 2019. The increases were primarily due to the growth in both public cloud services and enterprise cloud services for our premium customers.Revenues from public cloud services were RMB1,361.5 million (US$208.7 million), representing an increase of 44.1% from RMB945.1 million in the same period of 2019.Revenues from enterprise cloud services were RMB535.9 million (US$82.1 million), representing an increase of 143.1% from RMB220.4 million in the same period of 2019.Other revenues were RMB25.3 million (US$3.9 million).Gross profit was RMB92.6 million (US$14.2 million), compared to RMB54.3 million in the same period of 2019. Gross margin was 4.8%, compared to 4.6% in the same period of 2019.Non-GAAP gross profit was RMB94.9 million (US$14.5 million), compared to RMB56.7 million in the same period of 2019. Non-GAAP gross margin was 4.9%, compared to 4.8% in the same period of 2019. The increase was primarily due to our continued leverage on economies of scale and the costs savings, which is offset by the investment into new business opportunities of strategic verticals, and costs incurred for ongoing projects.Net loss was RMB105.2 million (US$16.1 million), compared with RMB239.5 million in the same quarter of 2019. The net margin significantly increased to -5.5% from -20.4% in the same quarter of 2019.Non-GAAP net loss was RMB174.3 million (US$26.7 million), compared with RMB254.6 million in the same quarter of 2019. The Non-GAAP net margin significantly increased to -9.1% from -21.7% in the same quarter of 2019.Non-GAAP EBITDA was RMB-17.5 million (US$-2.7 million), compared with RMB-89.3 million in the same quarter of 2019. Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was -0.9%, compared to -7.6% in the same quarter of 2019. The steady increase of Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was due to the revenue growth and operating leverage.Basic and diluted net loss per share was RMB0.03 (US$0.00), compared with RMB0.32 in the same quarter of 2019.Cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments were RMB6,117.7 million (US$937.6 million) as of December 31, 2020, compared to RMB2,248.7 million as of December 31, 2019.Outstanding ordinary shares were 3,339,618,633 as of December 31, 2020, equivalent to about 222,641,242 ADSs.Fiscal Year 2020 Financial ResultsTotal Revenues reached RMB6,577.3 million (US$1,008.0 million), representing an increase of 66.2% from RMB3,956.4 million in 2019. The increases were primarily due to the growth in both public cloud services and enterprise cloud services for our premium customers.Revenues from public cloud services were RMB5,166.9 million (US$791.9 million), representing an increase of 49.4% from RMB3,458.8 million in 2019.Revenues from enterprise cloud services were RMB1,372.7 million (US$210.4 million), representing an increase of 182.3% from RMB486.3 million in 2019.Other revenues were RMB37.7 million (US$5.7 million).Cost of revenues was RMB6,220.3 million (US$953.3 million), representing an increase of 57.5% from RMB3,948.6 million in 2019, primarily attributable to the rapid growth of our business. IDC costs increased by 42.1% to RMB4,058.8 million (US$622.0 million) from RMB2,856.6 million in 2019. The increase in IDC costs was in line with the Company’s expanding business and was partially offset by improved efficiency and utilization of bandwidth. IDC costs as a percentage of total revenues decreased from 72.2% during the same period of last year to 61.7% in 2020. Depreciation and amortization costs were RMB746.2 million (US$114.4 million), compared with RMB599.2 million in 2019.Gross profit increased to RMB357.0 million (US$54.7 million), from RMB7.7 million in 2019. Gross margin was 5.4%, compared to 0.2% in 2019.Non-GAAP gross profit increased to RMB367.6 million (US$56.3 million), from RMB16.2 million in 2019.Non-GAAP gross margin was 5.6%, compared to 0.4% in 2019. The increase was primarily due to our continued leverage on economies of scale and the costs savings.Net loss was RMB962.2 million (US$147.5 million), compared with RMB1,111.2 million in 2019. The net margin significantly increased to -14.6% from -28.1% in the same quarter of 2019.Non-GAAP net loss was RMB824.4 million (US$126.3 million), compared with RMB957.6 million in 2019. The Non-GAAP net margin significantly increased to -12.5% from -24.2% in 2019.Non-GAAP EBITDA was RMB-119.1 million (US$-18.3 million), compared with RMB-417.7 million in 2019. Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was -1.8%, compared to -10.6% in 2019. The steady increase of Non-GAAP EBITDA margin was due to the revenue growth and operating leverage.Basic and diluted net loss per share was RMB0.41 (US$0.06), compared with RMB1.31 in 2019.Business OutlookFor the first quarter of 2021, the Company expects total revenues to be between RMB1.83 billion and RMB1.93 billion. It is based on the Company’s current and preliminary views on the market and operational conditions, which are subject to change. The forecast reflects the relative late timing of Chinese Lunar New Year Holiday in the first quarter of 2021 compared with 2020, and the typical pattern of procurement and implementation process of major enterprises and public sector clients in mainland China in the first quarter each year.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"KC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1163,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":350145533,"gmtCreate":1616169753822,"gmtModify":1704791887197,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574684026781296","authorIdStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Sad","listText":"Sad","text":"Sad","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/350145533","repostId":"1199154789","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1199154789","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616164372,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1199154789?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-19 22:32","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Fed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1199154789","media":"zerohedge","summary":"As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio  exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on ","content":"<p>As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.</p><blockquote>The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on March 31, 2021.The temporary change was made to provide flexibility for depository institutions to provide credit to households and businesses in light of the COVID-19 event.</blockquote><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b822960da59d651f093b5113cd0c3fd0\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"319\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">This outcome is theone (again) correctly predictedby former NY Fed guru Zoltan Pozsar who following the FOMC said that \"the fact that the Fed made this adjustment practically preemptively – the o/n RRP facility is not being used at the moment, so there are no capacity constraints yet, while repo and bill yields aren’t trading negative yet –<b>suggests that the Fed is “foaming the runway” for the end of SLR exemption</b>.\"</p><p>Knowing well this would be a very hot button issue for the market, the Fed published thefollowing statementto ease trader nerves, noting that while the SLR special treatment will expire on March 31, the Fed is \"inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications\" and furthermore, \"<b>Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability</b>\" - in short, if yields spike, the Fed will re-introduce the SLR without delay:</p><blockquote>The Federal Reserve Board on Friday announced that the temporary change to its supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for bank holding companies will expire as scheduled on March 31. <b>Additionally, the Board will shortly seek comment on measures to adjust the SLR. The Board will take appropriate actions to assure that any changes to the SLR do not erode the overall strength of bank capital requirements.</b>To ease strains in the Treasury market resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to promote lending to households and businesses, the Board temporarily modified the SLR last year to exclude U.S. Treasury securities and central bank reserves. Since that time, the Treasury market has stabilized. <b>However, because of recent growth in the supply of central bank reserves and the issuance of Treasury securities, the Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability.To ensure that the SLR—which was established in 2014 as an additional capital requirement—remains effective in an environment of higher reserves, the Board will soon be inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications.</b>The proposal and comments will contribute to ongoing discussions with the Department of the Treasury and other regulators on future work to ensure the resiliency of the Treasury market.</blockquote><p>The Fed's soothing wods notwithstanding,<b>having been primed for a favorable outcome, the Fed's disappointing announcement was hardly the news traders were hoping for and stocks tumbled...</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c341c3843a5031cd1599c2c89e198050\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"305\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Bond yields spiked...</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/14173c1ce587fb45efe4c30ecc1dfbab\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"284\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">... while the stock of JPM, which is the most exposed bank to SLR relief (as noted yesterday in \"Facing Up To JP Morgan's Leverage Relief Threats\")...</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/32811183fba3dbddf1c440836298c7f3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"602\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">.... slumped.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2fba41463f15e79d2b8436cdd6a526fc\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"306\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">In case you've been living under a rock, here's why you should care about the SLR decision: First, for those whomissed our primer on the issue, some background from JPM (ironically the one bank that has the most to lose from the Fed's decision) the bottom line is that without SLR relief,<b>banks may have to delever, raise new capital, halt buybacks, sell preferred stock, turn down deposits and generally push back on reserves (not necessarily all of these, and not in that order) just as the Fed is injecting hundreds of billions of reserves into the market as the Treasury depletes its TGA account.</b></p><blockquote>The massive expansion of the Fed’s balance that has occurred implied an equally massive growth in bank reserves held at Federal Reserve banks. <b>The expiration of the regulatory relief would add ~$2.1tn of leverage exposure across the 8 GSIBs. As well, TGA reduction and continued QE could add another ~$2.35tn of deposits to the system during 2021.</b></blockquote><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/392342c2f3e1dd008b2276172a9b3ecf\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"253\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">While the expiry of the carve-out on March 31 would not have an immediate impact on GSIBs, the continued increase in leverage assets throughout the course of the year would increase long-term debt (LTD) and preferred requirements. Here, JPM takes an optimistic view and writes that<b>\"even the “worst” case issuance scenario as very manageable, with LTD needs of $35bn for TLAC requirements and preferred needs of $15-$20bn to maintain the industry-wide SLR at 5.6%.</b></p><p>The constraint is greater at the bank entity, where the capacity to grow leverage exposure to be ~$765bn at 6.2% SLR.\"Goldman's take was more troubling: the bank estimated that under the continued QE regime, there would be a shortfall of some $2 trillion in reserve capacity, mainly in the form of deposits which the banks would be unable to accept as part of ongoing QE (much more in Goldman'sfull take of the SLR quandary).</p><p><b>So what happens next?</b></p><p>Addressing this topic, yesterday Curvature's Scott Skyrm wrote that \"<i>the largest banks are enjoying much larger balance sheets, but there are political factors in Washington that are against an extension of the exemption.... Here are a couple of scenarios and their implications on the Repo market</i>:</p><blockquote>The exemption is extended 3 months or 6 months - No impact on the Repo market. It's already fully priced-in.The exemption is continued for reserves, but ended for Treasurys. <b>Since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise. Volatility increases as Repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants.The exemption is ended for both reserves and Treasurys. Same as above.</b></blockquote><p>In other words, Skyrm has a relatively downbeat view, warning that \"since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise.\" Additionally, volatility is likely to increase as repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants...</p><p>Perhaps a bit too draconian? Well, last week, JPMorgan laid out 5 scenarios for SLR, of which two predicted the end of SLR relief on March 31, as follow:</p><blockquote><u><b>3. Relief ends March 31, banks fully raise capital</b></u> <b>Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates</b> <u><b>4. Relief ends March 31, banks raise capital &amp; de-lever</b></u> <b>Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates</b></blockquote><p>Going back to Zoltan, let's recallthat the repo gurualso cautioned that \"ending the exemption of reserves and Treasuries from the calculation of the SLR may mean that U.S. banks will turn away deposits and reserves on the margin (not Treasuries) to leave more room for market-making activities,<b>and these flows will swell further money funds’ inflows coming from TGA drawdowns.</b>\"</p><p>More importantly, Zoltan does not expect broad chaos in repo or broader markets, and instead provides a more benign view on the negligible impact the SLR has had (and will be if it is eliminated), as he explained in a note from Tuesday.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/caeeb2b1290e084832f29d61cea6a90b\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"534\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">How to determine if Zoltan's benign view is correct? He concluded his note by writing that \"given that our call for a zero-to-negative FRA-OIS spread by the end of June was predicated on the end of SLR extension and an assumption that the Fed will try to fix a quantity problem with prices, not quantities, today’s adjustments mean that FRA-OIS won’t trade all the way down to zero or negative territory.\"</p><blockquote>FRA-OIS from here will be a function of how tight FX swaps will trade relative to OIS, but Treasury bills trading at deeply sub-zero rates is no longer a risk...</blockquote><p>While Bills have occasionally dipped into the negative territory on occasion, so far they have avoided a fullblown plunge into NIRP, which may be just the positive sign the market is waiting for to ease the nerves associated with the sudden and largely unexpected end of the SLR exemption.</p><p>* *&nbsp; *</p><p>Finally, for those curious what the immediate market impact will be, NatWest strategist Blake Gwinn writes that the Fed announcement that they’re letting regulatory exemptions for banks expire at the end of the month \"really threads the needle and \"assuages concerns about the potential long-term impact on the markets\" as<b>the SLR \"ends it but defuses a lot of the knee-jerk market reaction” by pledging to address the current design and calibration of the supplementary leverage ratio to prevent strains from developing</b>.</p><p>“I was never worried about a day-one bank puke of Treasuries or drawdown in repo or anything like that on no renewal,” Gwinn said. “My concern was the longer run,” like as reserves continue to rise, would the SLR “become a nuisance and drag on Treasuries and spreads” Gwinn concludes that with the statement, the Fed is<b>\"really speaking to those fears and basically saying, ‘don’t worry, we are on it’.”</b></p><p>Well, with yields spiking to HOD in early quad-witch trading, the market sure seems quite skeptical that the Fed is on anything.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Fed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFed Disappoints Market, Lets SLR Relief Expire: What Happens Next\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-19 22:32 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/stocks-bopnds-tank-after-fed-lets-slr-relief-expire><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/stocks-bopnds-tank-after-fed-lets-slr-relief-expire\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/stocks-bopnds-tank-after-fed-lets-slr-relief-expire","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1199154789","content_text":"As washinted at, and discussed in depth here,the Fed decided - under political pressure from progressive Democrats such asElizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown- to let the temporary Supplementary Leverage Ratio (SLR) exemption expire as scheduled on March 31, the one year anniversary of the rule change.The federal bank regulatory agencies today announced that the temporary change to the supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for depository institutions issued on May 15, 2020, will expire as scheduled on March 31, 2021.The temporary change was made to provide flexibility for depository institutions to provide credit to households and businesses in light of the COVID-19 event.This outcome is theone (again) correctly predictedby former NY Fed guru Zoltan Pozsar who following the FOMC said that \"the fact that the Fed made this adjustment practically preemptively – the o/n RRP facility is not being used at the moment, so there are no capacity constraints yet, while repo and bill yields aren’t trading negative yet –suggests that the Fed is “foaming the runway” for the end of SLR exemption.\"Knowing well this would be a very hot button issue for the market, the Fed published thefollowing statementto ease trader nerves, noting that while the SLR special treatment will expire on March 31, the Fed is \"inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications\" and furthermore, \"Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability\" - in short, if yields spike, the Fed will re-introduce the SLR without delay:The Federal Reserve Board on Friday announced that the temporary change to its supplementary leverage ratio, or SLR, for bank holding companies will expire as scheduled on March 31. Additionally, the Board will shortly seek comment on measures to adjust the SLR. The Board will take appropriate actions to assure that any changes to the SLR do not erode the overall strength of bank capital requirements.To ease strains in the Treasury market resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic and to promote lending to households and businesses, the Board temporarily modified the SLR last year to exclude U.S. Treasury securities and central bank reserves. Since that time, the Treasury market has stabilized. However, because of recent growth in the supply of central bank reserves and the issuance of Treasury securities, the Board may need to address the current design and calibration of the SLR over time to prevent strains from developing that could both constrain economic growth and undermine financial stability.To ensure that the SLR—which was established in 2014 as an additional capital requirement—remains effective in an environment of higher reserves, the Board will soon be inviting public comment on several potential SLR modifications.The proposal and comments will contribute to ongoing discussions with the Department of the Treasury and other regulators on future work to ensure the resiliency of the Treasury market.The Fed's soothing wods notwithstanding,having been primed for a favorable outcome, the Fed's disappointing announcement was hardly the news traders were hoping for and stocks tumbled...Bond yields spiked...... while the stock of JPM, which is the most exposed bank to SLR relief (as noted yesterday in \"Facing Up To JP Morgan's Leverage Relief Threats\")....... slumped.In case you've been living under a rock, here's why you should care about the SLR decision: First, for those whomissed our primer on the issue, some background from JPM (ironically the one bank that has the most to lose from the Fed's decision) the bottom line is that without SLR relief,banks may have to delever, raise new capital, halt buybacks, sell preferred stock, turn down deposits and generally push back on reserves (not necessarily all of these, and not in that order) just as the Fed is injecting hundreds of billions of reserves into the market as the Treasury depletes its TGA account.The massive expansion of the Fed’s balance that has occurred implied an equally massive growth in bank reserves held at Federal Reserve banks. The expiration of the regulatory relief would add ~$2.1tn of leverage exposure across the 8 GSIBs. As well, TGA reduction and continued QE could add another ~$2.35tn of deposits to the system during 2021.While the expiry of the carve-out on March 31 would not have an immediate impact on GSIBs, the continued increase in leverage assets throughout the course of the year would increase long-term debt (LTD) and preferred requirements. Here, JPM takes an optimistic view and writes that\"even the “worst” case issuance scenario as very manageable, with LTD needs of $35bn for TLAC requirements and preferred needs of $15-$20bn to maintain the industry-wide SLR at 5.6%.The constraint is greater at the bank entity, where the capacity to grow leverage exposure to be ~$765bn at 6.2% SLR.\"Goldman's take was more troubling: the bank estimated that under the continued QE regime, there would be a shortfall of some $2 trillion in reserve capacity, mainly in the form of deposits which the banks would be unable to accept as part of ongoing QE (much more in Goldman'sfull take of the SLR quandary).So what happens next?Addressing this topic, yesterday Curvature's Scott Skyrm wrote that \"the largest banks are enjoying much larger balance sheets, but there are political factors in Washington that are against an extension of the exemption.... Here are a couple of scenarios and their implications on the Repo market:The exemption is extended 3 months or 6 months - No impact on the Repo market. It's already fully priced-in.The exemption is continued for reserves, but ended for Treasurys. Since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise. Volatility increases as Repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants.The exemption is ended for both reserves and Treasurys. Same as above.In other words, Skyrm has a relatively downbeat view, warning that \"since large banks are the largest cash providers in the Repo market, less cash is intermediated into the market and Repo rates rise.\" Additionally, volatility is likely to increase as repo assets move from the largest banks to the other Repo market participants...Perhaps a bit too draconian? Well, last week, JPMorgan laid out 5 scenarios for SLR, of which two predicted the end of SLR relief on March 31, as follow:3. Relief ends March 31, banks fully raise capital Impact on BanksRatesFront-End Rates 4. Relief ends March 31, banks raise capital & de-lever Impact on BanksRatesFront-End RatesGoing back to Zoltan, let's recallthat the repo gurualso cautioned that \"ending the exemption of reserves and Treasuries from the calculation of the SLR may mean that U.S. banks will turn away deposits and reserves on the margin (not Treasuries) to leave more room for market-making activities,and these flows will swell further money funds’ inflows coming from TGA drawdowns.\"More importantly, Zoltan does not expect broad chaos in repo or broader markets, and instead provides a more benign view on the negligible impact the SLR has had (and will be if it is eliminated), as he explained in a note from Tuesday.How to determine if Zoltan's benign view is correct? He concluded his note by writing that \"given that our call for a zero-to-negative FRA-OIS spread by the end of June was predicated on the end of SLR extension and an assumption that the Fed will try to fix a quantity problem with prices, not quantities, today’s adjustments mean that FRA-OIS won’t trade all the way down to zero or negative territory.\"FRA-OIS from here will be a function of how tight FX swaps will trade relative to OIS, but Treasury bills trading at deeply sub-zero rates is no longer a risk...While Bills have occasionally dipped into the negative territory on occasion, so far they have avoided a fullblown plunge into NIRP, which may be just the positive sign the market is waiting for to ease the nerves associated with the sudden and largely unexpected end of the SLR exemption.* *  *Finally, for those curious what the immediate market impact will be, NatWest strategist Blake Gwinn writes that the Fed announcement that they’re letting regulatory exemptions for banks expire at the end of the month \"really threads the needle and \"assuages concerns about the potential long-term impact on the markets\" asthe SLR \"ends it but defuses a lot of the knee-jerk market reaction” by pledging to address the current design and calibration of the supplementary leverage ratio to prevent strains from developing.“I was never worried about a day-one bank puke of Treasuries or drawdown in repo or anything like that on no renewal,” Gwinn said. “My concern was the longer run,” like as reserves continue to rise, would the SLR “become a nuisance and drag on Treasuries and spreads” Gwinn concludes that with the statement, the Fed is\"really speaking to those fears and basically saying, ‘don’t worry, we are on it’.”Well, with yields spiking to HOD in early quad-witch trading, the market sure seems quite skeptical that the Fed is on anything.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1103,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":322917665,"gmtCreate":1615767185957,"gmtModify":1704786152577,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574684026781296","authorIdStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Pls likemt comment","listText":"Pls likemt comment","text":"Pls likemt comment","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/322917665","repostId":"1199092369","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1185,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":359192839,"gmtCreate":1616372138621,"gmtModify":1704793116024,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574684026781296","authorIdStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like me pls","listText":"Like me pls","text":"Like me pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/359192839","repostId":"1126157111","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3566,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":320767990,"gmtCreate":1615179056810,"gmtModify":1704779172454,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574684026781296","authorIdStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/320767990","repostId":"2117651365","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1165,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":340520186,"gmtCreate":1617435707645,"gmtModify":1704699685446,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574684026781296","authorIdStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"O","listText":"O","text":"O","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/340520186","repostId":"2124875875","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3024,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[{"author":{"id":"3575955563694893","authorId":"3575955563694893","name":"T20211126001","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/42cf33544f719c12b3a2aa7e6bd084b1","crmLevel":12,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"idStr":"3575955563694893","authorIdStr":"3575955563694893"},"content":"Please help to Reponse and liKe my comment thankd","text":"Please help to Reponse and liKe my comment thankd","html":"Please help to Reponse and liKe my comment thankd"}],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":350144936,"gmtCreate":1616169800625,"gmtModify":1704791888007,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574684026781296","authorIdStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Please like&nbsp;","listText":"Please like&nbsp;","text":"Please like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/350144936","repostId":"1106180509","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1106180509","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1616161534,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1106180509?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-03-19 21:45","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Here Are The Stocks To Watch Ahead Of Today's Quad-Witch Gamma 'Unclenching'","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1106180509","media":"zerohedge","summary":"Today's quad-witching options expirations are likely to remove even more potential stabilizing flows","content":"<p>Today's quad-witching options expirations are likely to remove even more potential stabilizing flows from US equity markets as roughly<b>25% of S&amp;P gamma rolls off, with 40% of QQQ and 50% of single stocks</b>. AsSpotGamma reminds us, the bulk of SPX gamma expires at 9:30AM EST, but that position is heavily outsized by SPY/QQQ which expires&nbsp; at the 4pm EST close. This gamma unclench and delta de-risk lower could<b>accelerate any downside moves in the markets</b>.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/23bc9b6e77ee042a748f9e649cdbd3f1\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"375\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">SpotGammasays that the<b>S&amp;P must hold the 390/3900 critical flip line,</b>even though we see little in the way of S&amp;P put positions (and therefore negative S&amp;P500 gamma) below</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/cf6f304619aa55a563018f59085453b4\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"344\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">AsSpotGammaconcludes, said another way,<b>“buying the dip” is not advised if SPX breaks 3900.</b>However, the post-quad-witch picture is more optimistic because while the QQQ puts expiring today provide downside fuel, they will also be very sensitive to implied volatility and decay, and so<b>if there is a bounce at the open it could setup a decent QQQ rally into the 315-320 area as dealers quickly cover</b>their corresponding short hedges.</p><p>Into Monday these tech puts could provide a decent dealer short hedge (and therefore market tailwind) and reduce QQQ volatility next week. The lower QQQ closes the larger the dealer short will be that is tied to todays close. Therefore a lower close provides more “bounce fuel” into the start of next week.</p><p>Also brace for higher single stock volatility today due to the large amount of single stock options expiring today. As Goldman notes,<b>$655bn of options set to expire today, a record for non-January expiries and the third largest overall.</b>Today’s expiry could be important for stocks with large open interest in at-the-money (ATM) options; market makers delta-hedging their unusually large options portfolios will be active.</p><p><b>Here are the stocks where option activity could have big impact</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2dd4934592756abdb35473d2ffcf21fb\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"718\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\">Stocks where a large percentage of contracts, relative to their average daily volume traded, expire on Friday, potentially leading to “pinning”. However, if delta-hedgers are net short ATM options (have a “negative gamma” position), their hedging activity could exacerbate stock price moves. This ﬂow is likely to dampen volatility in some names while exacerbating stock price moves in others.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Here Are The Stocks To Watch Ahead Of Today's Quad-Witch Gamma 'Unclenching'</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHere Are The Stocks To Watch Ahead Of Today's Quad-Witch Gamma 'Unclenching'\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-03-19 21:45 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/here-are-stocks-watch-ahead-todays-quad-witch-gamma-unclenching?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29><strong>zerohedge</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Today's quad-witching options expirations are likely to remove even more potential stabilizing flows from US equity markets as roughly25% of S&P gamma rolls off, with 40% of QQQ and 50% of single ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/here-are-stocks-watch-ahead-todays-quad-witch-gamma-unclenching?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/here-are-stocks-watch-ahead-todays-quad-witch-gamma-unclenching?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+zerohedge%2Ffeed+%28zero+hedge+-+on+a+long+enough+timeline%2C+the+survival+rate+for+everyone+drops+to+zero%29","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1106180509","content_text":"Today's quad-witching options expirations are likely to remove even more potential stabilizing flows from US equity markets as roughly25% of S&P gamma rolls off, with 40% of QQQ and 50% of single stocks. AsSpotGamma reminds us, the bulk of SPX gamma expires at 9:30AM EST, but that position is heavily outsized by SPY/QQQ which expires  at the 4pm EST close. This gamma unclench and delta de-risk lower couldaccelerate any downside moves in the markets.SpotGammasays that theS&P must hold the 390/3900 critical flip line,even though we see little in the way of S&P put positions (and therefore negative S&P500 gamma) belowAsSpotGammaconcludes, said another way,“buying the dip” is not advised if SPX breaks 3900.However, the post-quad-witch picture is more optimistic because while the QQQ puts expiring today provide downside fuel, they will also be very sensitive to implied volatility and decay, and soif there is a bounce at the open it could setup a decent QQQ rally into the 315-320 area as dealers quickly covertheir corresponding short hedges.Into Monday these tech puts could provide a decent dealer short hedge (and therefore market tailwind) and reduce QQQ volatility next week. The lower QQQ closes the larger the dealer short will be that is tied to todays close. Therefore a lower close provides more “bounce fuel” into the start of next week.Also brace for higher single stock volatility today due to the large amount of single stock options expiring today. As Goldman notes,$655bn of options set to expire today, a record for non-January expiries and the third largest overall.Today’s expiry could be important for stocks with large open interest in at-the-money (ATM) options; market makers delta-hedging their unusually large options portfolios will be active.Here are the stocks where option activity could have big impactStocks where a large percentage of contracts, relative to their average daily volume traded, expire on Friday, potentially leading to “pinning”. However, if delta-hedgers are net short ATM options (have a “negative gamma” position), their hedging activity could exacerbate stock price moves. This ﬂow is likely to dampen volatility in some names while exacerbating stock price moves in others.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2882,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":357160543,"gmtCreate":1617247162282,"gmtModify":1704697771965,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574684026781296","authorIdStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like me pls","listText":"Like me pls","text":"Like me pls","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/357160543","repostId":"2124056742","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2124056742","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1617245470,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2124056742?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-04-01 10:51","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Asia's factory recovery picks up but cost pressures emerge","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2124056742","media":"Reuters","summary":"TOKYO, April 1 (Reuters) - Asia's factories stepped up production in March as a solid recovery in gl","content":"<p>TOKYO, April 1 (Reuters) - Asia's factories stepped up production in March as a solid recovery in global demand helped manufacturers move past the setbacks of the pandemic, although rising costs are creating new challenges for businesses in the region.</p><p>A series of upbeat factory surveys released on Thursday reinforce market optimism that vaccine rollouts, as well as strong growth in global powerhouses like the United States and China, will help economies emerge from their sharp downturns of 2020.</p><p>Japan and South Korea saw factory activity expand in March thanks to solid demand at home and abroad, purchasing manager indexes' <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PMI.UK\">$(PMI.UK)$</a> showed, offering relief to policymakers facing pressure to speed up a patchy recovery.</p><p>\"South Korean manufacturers continued to signal strong optimism as the rollout of COVID-19 vaccinations began and demand for new products accelerated,\" said Usamah Bhatti, economist at IHS <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRKT\">Markit</a>.</p><p>China's factory activity in March expanded at the slowest pace in almost a year, though underlying economic conditions remained positive.</p><p>The Caixin/Markit Manufacturing PMI, which focuses on smaller firms, dropped to 50.6 in March from February's 50.9, missing market expectations.</p><p>The private-sector survey came after Wednesday's release of the official manufacturing PMI that showed Chinese factories cranking up production after a brief lull during the Lunar New Year holiday.</p><p>Activity in big, export-reliant economies stayed brisk.</p><p>The final au Jibun Bank Japan PMI rose to a seasonally adjusted 52.7 in March from the previous month's 51.4 reading, marking the fastest expansion since October 2018.</p><p>South Korea's PMI stood at 55.3 in March, with activity expanding for a sixth straight month.</p><p>Manufacturing activity also accelerated in Taiwan, Vietnam and Indonesia, the March PMI surveys showed. Malaysian activity continued to decline but at a slower pace.</p><p>There were some signs rising prices were straining firms, however, clouding the outlook for Asian economies.</p><p>Although supply chain disruption related to previous COVID-19 outbreaks eased, China's Caixin survey showed factories reporting a sharp increase in input costs.</p><p>\"We should pay attention to inflation in future as the gauges for input and output prices have been rising for several months,\" said Wang Zhe, Senior Economist at Caixin Insight Group.</p><p>\"The growing inflationary pressure limits the room for future policies and is not a good thing for sustaining an economic recovery in the post-epidemic period.\"</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Asia's factory recovery picks up but cost pressures emerge</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAsia's factory recovery picks up but cost pressures emerge\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-04-01 10:51</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>TOKYO, April 1 (Reuters) - Asia's factories stepped up production in March as a solid recovery in global demand helped manufacturers move past the setbacks of the pandemic, although rising costs are creating new challenges for businesses in the region.</p><p>A series of upbeat factory surveys released on Thursday reinforce market optimism that vaccine rollouts, as well as strong growth in global powerhouses like the United States and China, will help economies emerge from their sharp downturns of 2020.</p><p>Japan and South Korea saw factory activity expand in March thanks to solid demand at home and abroad, purchasing manager indexes' <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PMI.UK\">$(PMI.UK)$</a> showed, offering relief to policymakers facing pressure to speed up a patchy recovery.</p><p>\"South Korean manufacturers continued to signal strong optimism as the rollout of COVID-19 vaccinations began and demand for new products accelerated,\" said Usamah Bhatti, economist at IHS <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRKT\">Markit</a>.</p><p>China's factory activity in March expanded at the slowest pace in almost a year, though underlying economic conditions remained positive.</p><p>The Caixin/Markit Manufacturing PMI, which focuses on smaller firms, dropped to 50.6 in March from February's 50.9, missing market expectations.</p><p>The private-sector survey came after Wednesday's release of the official manufacturing PMI that showed Chinese factories cranking up production after a brief lull during the Lunar New Year holiday.</p><p>Activity in big, export-reliant economies stayed brisk.</p><p>The final au Jibun Bank Japan PMI rose to a seasonally adjusted 52.7 in March from the previous month's 51.4 reading, marking the fastest expansion since October 2018.</p><p>South Korea's PMI stood at 55.3 in March, with activity expanding for a sixth straight month.</p><p>Manufacturing activity also accelerated in Taiwan, Vietnam and Indonesia, the March PMI surveys showed. Malaysian activity continued to decline but at a slower pace.</p><p>There were some signs rising prices were straining firms, however, clouding the outlook for Asian economies.</p><p>Although supply chain disruption related to previous COVID-19 outbreaks eased, China's Caixin survey showed factories reporting a sharp increase in input costs.</p><p>\"We should pay attention to inflation in future as the gauges for input and output prices have been rising for several months,\" said Wang Zhe, Senior Economist at Caixin Insight Group.</p><p>\"The growing inflationary pressure limits the room for future policies and is not a good thing for sustaining an economic recovery in the post-epidemic period.\"</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2124056742","content_text":"TOKYO, April 1 (Reuters) - Asia's factories stepped up production in March as a solid recovery in global demand helped manufacturers move past the setbacks of the pandemic, although rising costs are creating new challenges for businesses in the region.A series of upbeat factory surveys released on Thursday reinforce market optimism that vaccine rollouts, as well as strong growth in global powerhouses like the United States and China, will help economies emerge from their sharp downturns of 2020.Japan and South Korea saw factory activity expand in March thanks to solid demand at home and abroad, purchasing manager indexes' $(PMI.UK)$ showed, offering relief to policymakers facing pressure to speed up a patchy recovery.\"South Korean manufacturers continued to signal strong optimism as the rollout of COVID-19 vaccinations began and demand for new products accelerated,\" said Usamah Bhatti, economist at IHS Markit.China's factory activity in March expanded at the slowest pace in almost a year, though underlying economic conditions remained positive.The Caixin/Markit Manufacturing PMI, which focuses on smaller firms, dropped to 50.6 in March from February's 50.9, missing market expectations.The private-sector survey came after Wednesday's release of the official manufacturing PMI that showed Chinese factories cranking up production after a brief lull during the Lunar New Year holiday.Activity in big, export-reliant economies stayed brisk.The final au Jibun Bank Japan PMI rose to a seasonally adjusted 52.7 in March from the previous month's 51.4 reading, marking the fastest expansion since October 2018.South Korea's PMI stood at 55.3 in March, with activity expanding for a sixth straight month.Manufacturing activity also accelerated in Taiwan, Vietnam and Indonesia, the March PMI surveys showed. Malaysian activity continued to decline but at a slower pace.There were some signs rising prices were straining firms, however, clouding the outlook for Asian economies.Although supply chain disruption related to previous COVID-19 outbreaks eased, China's Caixin survey showed factories reporting a sharp increase in input costs.\"We should pay attention to inflation in future as the gauges for input and output prices have been rising for several months,\" said Wang Zhe, Senior Economist at Caixin Insight Group.\"The growing inflationary pressure limits the room for future policies and is not a good thing for sustaining an economic recovery in the post-epidemic period.\"","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2920,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":325382584,"gmtCreate":1615865107748,"gmtModify":1704787652705,"author":{"id":"3574684026781296","authorId":"3574684026781296","name":"ngiam96","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"3574684026781296","authorIdStr":"3574684026781296"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Pls rpely to me","listText":"Pls rpely to me","text":"Pls rpely to me","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/325382584","repostId":"1118245575","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1092,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}