So what happens with Crypto hoarding companies like MSTR and likes when this happens?  Their movements bear greatly exaggerated correlation to the prices of the cryptos they are proxy of.

To be clear, Nasdaq-100 is NOT S&P100. These are very different indexes and not of equal standing. S&P100 is more restrictive and carries more importance to financial institutions. Please read re-produced article below:-  MSTR (MicroStrategy, now called “Strategy” in some reports) is not currently a member of the S&P 100. Here’s the situation: 📌 S&P 100 vs. S&P 500 • The S&P 100 is a subset of the S&P 500, consisting of 100 large, established U.S. companies selected for size, liquidity, and industry representation.  • To be in the S&P 100, a company must first be included in the S&P 500 (it’s essentially the top tier of the S&P 500). Because MSTR is not in the S&P 500, it cannot be in the S&P 100 either. 📌 Current Index Membership for M

Okay. So another car company which is saying it is not a car company. I remember back in 1999, the not-so-secret formula in driving up share value is to annoumce any new venture that ends with ".com".  AI may be the biggest tulip burst ever.

I have to agree with Scaramucci. Michael Saylor is indeed very smart. You have to be to be able to sucker so many into a company which produces almost nothing and has very little acutal revenue. He raise funds by issuing new stocks and debts and uses most of it to pay dividends to holders of earlier stocks and notes. How is this not a ponzi scheme.

Strategy (MSTR) is not listed in the S&P 100 index, and its exclusion from the S&P 500 highlights the challenges it faces in meeting broader market index criteria due to its unique asset composition.

Strategy (MSTR) is not listed in the S&P 100 index, and its exclusion from the S&P 500 highlights the challenges it faces in meeting broader market index criteria due to its unique asset composition.

Don't worry. Tesla's plan is to exit the car business. Even though that is their only real business. Hahaha.  Only half joking.

History repeating right before your very eyes.  Tulip Craze of 1620's, The South Sea Bubble of the 1700's, The Dot Com bust of the late 1990's, The Sub-Prime crisis of 2008 and now the double combination of Cryto and AI mass-hysteria. This time, it may be the worst. Too many would-be billionaires have pouted everything they have into this bubble now.

MSTR warning. Pay heed and protect yourself. Also look up The Tulip Craze of the 1630's and the South Sea Fraud of the 1700's. It is very alarmingly similar to what we are seeing today. Not just with Cryptocurrencies but also all shouts of AI, Robots and Quantum Computing. Not that these ideas will never work but that they will likely deliver a worthy value for a long time. Just like the South Sea Co made the promise that the company had exclusive trading rights between England and South America. Even though, back then, Spain controlled South America and England was at war with Spain.

Bitcoin resumes it's slide after a short few days of recovery. The pattern seen this year suggest a new low will happen before the year ends.  Be careful and watch closely if this is happening because it may mean cryptocurrencies are heading into a deep slump.

The real fear is the mirage is starting to fade. Just like the Tulip craze in the 18th century, people may now be realising Crypto value exist only in the imagination of people who just want the next guy to be the last guy holding the bag when it crashes. The truth is, the promoters of cryptocurrencies are also the ones hoping and praying they will not be that last guy holding the bag.

Why should anyone be surprised? These are all fake organisations with no intrinsic value. They don't produce anything of any value. They don't offer any service of any worth. The only thing that drives any perceived value are the greed of people who push up the prices only hoping to offload them at the optimum prices to any sucker that is stupid enough to believe the hype that Crypto's will always appreciate in value.

This shows they don't have cash to pay. 

Sell shares to raise dollars to pay dividends? How is this allowed? You are supposed to pay dividends from profits from trading or business operations. How is this not a ponzi?