NicoleL personal page - To The Moon

NicoleL

No personal profile

62Follow

4Followers

0Topic

0Badge

2021-08-09

Like

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-08-07

Like

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-08-05

Like

Hong Kong stocks end lower on tech regulatory worries

2021-08-22

Like

Cheap Stocks To Buy: Should You Watch These 5 Growth Stocks?

2021-08-05

Like

Hong Kong stocks end lower on tech regulatory worries

2021-08-10

Like

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-07-30

Oh no

Atlassian stock Popped 26% as results, outlook beat Street view

2021-08-18

Like

Apple Sees Delay In Its Shift Away From China Due To COVID-19: Report

2021-08-15

Like

Sorry, the original content has been removed

2021-08-06

Let’s c

Sorry, the original content has been removed

Go to Tiger App to see more news

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"userPageInfo":{"id":"4088936884410440","uuid":"4088936884410440","gmtCreate":1625900168398,"gmtModify":1625900168398,"name":"NicoleL","pinyin":"nicolel","introduction":"","introductionEn":null,"signature":"","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":4,"headSize":62,"tweetSize":0,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2025.09.17","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-1","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Elite Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 30","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ab0f87127c854ce3191a752d57b46edc","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c9835ce48b8c8743566d344ac7a7ba8c","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76754b53ce7a90019f132c1d2fbc698f","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2022.01.30","exceedPercentage":"60.33%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":3,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"baikeInfo":{},"tab":"hot","tweets":[{"id":832252428,"gmtCreate":1629643720864,"gmtModify":1676530084831,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4088936884410440","idStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/832252428","repostId":"1128033677","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1128033677","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629603975,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1128033677?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-22 11:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cheap Stocks To Buy: Should You Watch These 5 Growth Stocks?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1128033677","media":"investors","summary":"Bull market, bear market, or trend-less market? Regardless ofwhat stage of the market cycle we're in","content":"<p>Bull market, bear market, or trend-less market? Regardless ofwhat stage of the market cycle we're in, some folks never tire of searching for cheap stocks to buy.</p>\n<p>And who doesn't love a bargain? After all, the lure of finding a stock that triples from $1 to $3 a share, or quintuples from $5 to $25, may prove irresistible.</p>\n<p>Are there any unique problems or subtle challenges with this strategy of hunting cheap stocks to buy? Yes. Let's consider a few.</p>\n<p>Hundreds of stocks trade at a \"low\" price on both the Nasdaq and the NYSE. So, how can you pick the winners consistently?</p>\n<p>Here's another problem: IBD research consistently finds that dozens, if not hundreds, of great stocks each year do not start out as penny shares. Most institutional money managers don't touch cheap stocks. Imagine a large-cap mutual fund trying to buy a meaningful stake in a stock that has been trading a dollar a share. If it has thin trading volume, the fund manager will have an awfully tough time accumulating shares without making a big impact on the stock price.</p>\n<p>Solid, increasing institutional buying makes upthe I in CAN SLIM, IBD's seven-factor paradigm ofsuccessful investing in growth stocks.</p>\n<p><b>Cheap Stocks To Buy: First, Understand These Pitfalls</b></p>\n<p>Another cold, hard truth that proponents of penny stocks don't tell you? Many low-priced shares stay low for a very long time.</p>\n<p>So, if your hard-earned money is tied up in a 50-cent stock that fails to generate meaningful capital appreciation, you might not only be nursing a losing stock. You also face the lost opportunity of investing in atrue stock market leader in Leaderboardor a member of theIBD 50, theLong-Term Leaders, orIBD Big Cap 20.</p>\n<p>Let's consider<b>Zoom Video</b>(ZM) and telemedicine pioneer<b>Teladoc</b>(TDOC) in 2020, after the coronavirus bear market ended. These two and many others traded at an \"expensive\" price when they broke out to new 52-week highs and began magnificent rallies. But the quality of their business, the supercharged growth in fundamentals, and significant buying by top-rated mutual funds affirmed that their premium share prices signaled a high level of quality.</p>\n<p>Zoom Video, after clearing adeep cup baseat 107.44 in February 2020, went on to rise nearly sixfold to its 2020 peak at 588. Today? Zoom stock is forming anew baseand testing buying support at the50-day moving average. Last month, ZM joinedSwingTraderas a new position.</p>\n<p>Teladocroared past an 86.40proper buy pointin mid-January 2020. Seven months later, the stock hit 253, up 193%. Today? TDOC stock is trying to climb back above its key50-day moving average, a critical technical level of medium-term price support and price resistance. Like Zoom, Teladoc is also deep in the weeds ofbuilding a new base.</p>\n<p><b>Zoom And Teladoc Aren't Alone</b></p>\n<p>Leaderboard member<b>Adobe</b>(ADBE) cleared a 157.99 entry in afive-week flat basein the week ended Oct. 20, 2017. The megacap tech marked a new high of 536 in early September 2020 before cooling off. And the video editing, document management, and data analytics software giant recently staged anothernew breakoutpast anew buy point, this time at 525.54.</p>\n<p>ADBE stock has rallied sharply, gaining more than 20%. Adobe has been a mainstay on theIBD Long-Term Leaders.</p>\n<p>Still, can you employ theCAN SLIM strategyfor cheap stocks to buy as well?</p>\n<p><b>5 Cheap Stocks To Watch And Buy</b></p>\n<p>TheIBD Stock Screenerfilters cheap stocks that not only trade at $10 or less per share. Some also carry many of the key fundamental, technical and fund ownership quality traits routinely seen among the greatest stock market winners.</p>\n<p>Keep in mind that liquidity is often thin. So, you might not get trade executions at an ideal price. If fund managers dump shares all at once to lock in profits, you might incur further losses when exiting the stock.</p>\n<p>So, check the gap between a cheap stock's best bid and best ask prices, or the difference between what one investor is willing to pay and another is willing to sell. The smaller the gap between bid and ask prices, the less price slippage.</p>\n<p>And don't forget the No. 1 rule of investing:keep your losses small and under control.</p>\n<p><i>Stock No. 1, screening for top IBDComposite Rating</i>:<b>Wipro</b>(WIT). The India-based IT consultant has made a superb run-up since bottoming at 2.52 at the low of the coronavirus market crash in March 2020. Shares formed aflat basethat highlights an 8.42proper buy point. Now, WIT has cleared this correct entry.</p>\n<p><b>Buy With Rules</b></p>\n<p>The5% buy zonegoes up to 8.83. So, WIT is on the verge of jumping out of the ideal buy range.</p>\n<p>TheComposite Ratingremains superlative at 97 on a scale of 1 (wizened) to 99 (wizardly). WIT also stands out with a 90Relative Strength Rating. A 94 RS Rating means Wipro has outrun 94% of all companies in the IBD database over the past 12 months.</p>\n<p>You might ask: Why is the entry point exactly at 8.42?</p>\n<p>For starters, we take the highest price on the left side of a flat base — in Wipro's case, 8.32 — then add a dime. Moving 10 cents above the base's high gives the individual trader a sense that large fund managers are earnestly accumulating shares. Again, you want the institutions working with you, not against you.</p>\n<p>Please read this Investor's Corner for more insight into finding thecorrect buy point.</p>\n<p>William O'Neil, founder of Investor's Business Daily, liked to use one-eighth of a point (or roughly 12 cents) as the amount a stock had to rise above a pivot point before he considered a stock as breaking out. Of course, until decimalization transformed the stock market at the dawn of the new millennium, the major U.S. exchanges quoted share prices in one-eighths, one-sixteenths and even one-32nds of a dollar.</p>\n<p><b>Cheap Stock No. 2</b></p>\n<p><i>Stock No. 2, screening for top IBD Composite Rating</i>:<b>Entravision Communications</b>(EVC). The Santa Monica-based Spanish language media firm owns TV stations and FM and AM radio stations across nine states. The stock broke out of a 4.52entry pointin surging volume during the week ended May 21.</p>\n<p>Three weeks ago, the stock made a sound first test of buying support at the10-week moving averagenear 5.62. Yet this week, EVC is pulling back hard and eyeing another test of institutional support near that 10-week line, which has now risen to 6.34.</p>\n<p>Buying shares as close as possible to the 10-week moving average amid a healthy rebound offers the intrepid trader asecondary buy point.</p>\n<p>Entravision's IBD ratings include an 86 Composite, which is below a preferable level of 90 or higher; 98 Relative Strength; anup/down volume ratioof 1.5; and back to a solid A- forAccumulation/Distribution. The stock also pays a dividend; due to recent strong price gains, the annualized yield has dropped to 1.6%.</p>\n<p>The company reported strong second-quarter results on Aug. 5. Earnings tripled to 9 cents a share as revenue vaulted 295% vs. a year ago to $178 million.</p>\n<p><b>Premium IBD Ratings Galore</b></p>\n<p><i>Stock No. 3, screening for topComposite Rating</i>:<b>Loma Negra</b>(LOMA). The Argentine cement, concrete, aggregates and lime supplier posted a 500% jump in first-quarter earnings vs. a year earlier to 24 cents a share. Sales accelerated to a 37% gain to $143 million, according toMarketSmith. TheIBD relative strength linebolted to new 52-week highs recently.</p>\n<p>Loma Negra briefly pulled back into the5% buy zoneafter clearing abase-on-base patternat 6.79. The buy zone goes up to 7.13. However, like other commodity stocks, LOMA has fallen sharply in recent days.</p>\n<p>In short, don't chase the stock. Good time to wait and watch.</p>\n<p>Loma'sComposite Ratinghas fallen to an unsavory 69 rating. The 86 RS Rating is good but not great anymore.</p>\n<p>An 86 RS score means over the past 12 months Loma has outperformed 86% of all companies in the IBD database.</p>\n<p><b>A Former Huge Winner In Apparel Retail</b></p>\n<p><i>Stock No. 4, screening for topRelative Strength Rating</i>:<b>Chico's FAS</b>(CHS). The former leader of IBD's retail apparel and shoes industry group is continuing to make atest of the 10-week lineafter clearing acup-without-handle basein March at 4.22.</p>\n<p>The first and second rallies off the 10-week line — near 5.76 during the week ended July 23 — after astrong breakoutpose as secondary entry points.</p>\n<p>Due to the recent pullback, it's now beginning to look as if CHS will form anew base.</p>\n<p>Among cheap apparel stocks to buy, Chico's sports a top-drawer 99 RS Rating. This means its relative strength is top-notch. Put another way, CHS has outperformed 99% of all companies in the IBD database over the past 12 months.</p>\n<p>On the fundamentals side, at least eight quarters in a row of net losses by the Fort Myers, Fla., firm weigh on the drab 69Composite Rating. But sales rebounded 38% in the April-ended fiscal first quarter to $388 million. According to Yahoo Finance, one analyst thinks Chico's will post a net loss of 4 cents a share in the July-ended second quarter; another analyst targets an 11-cent loss. The women's apparel chain lost 40 cents a share in the year-ago quarter.</p>\n<p>The consensus forecast calls for a 33% jump in the top line, however, to $407.4 million. Look for Q2 results in late August.</p>\n<p><b>Chip Leader Stumbles</b></p>\n<p><i>Stock No. 5, screening for Fastest Growing Earnings Per Share</i>:<b>United Microelectronics</b>(UMC). The Taiwan-based integrated circuit maker has risen nearly fourfold after a July 2020 breakout around 3. Anew baseoffers an earlyentry pointat 9.92, 10 cents above the high in the week ended June 4.</p>\n<p>On July 29, UMC stock broke out with an 8% gain and rallied into the5% buy zone, which goes up to 10.42 from the 9.92 buy point. But UMC has retreated sharply. On the bright side, UMC is holding above the key 10-week moving average. And it remains mildly above the 9.92breakout point.</p>\n<p>A key rule is to never let a stock that shows a double-digit percentage gain turn into afull round trip— even among cheap stocks.</p>\n<p>United's earnings per share have grown 50%, 350%, 225%, 167%, 400% and 100% vs. year-ago levels in the past six quarters on sales increases of 32%, 30%, 28%, 15%, 19% and 21%. Solid numbers for bothComposite Rating(94) and Relative Strength (95); however, these ratings are best used for selecting stocks to buy, not for timing any entries or exits.</p>\n<p>UMC holds a best-possible A grade for theSMR Rating, which measures sales, margins andreturn on equity.</p>\n<p><b>A Strong Second Quarter</b></p>\n<p>United Micro reported robust second-quarter results on July 28. According to Yahoo Finance, one analyst saw UMC notching a net profit of 13 cents per share while another saw 15 cents vs. 9 cents a year ago. The company exceeded both analysts' views with profit of 18 cents a share, doubling the 9 cents it earned a year earlier.</p>\n<p>Sales grew 21% to $1.82 billion. This increase also marked a second quarter in a row of accelerating growth. The top line rose 15% in Q4 2020 and accelerated 19% in Q1 this year.</p>\n<p><b>More Trading Ideas</b></p>\n<p>Several weeks ago, these two cheap stocks made either the \"Accelerating Sales\" or \"Top Relative Strength Rating\" segment ofIBD Stock Screener:&nbsp;<b>Dynavax Technologies</b>(DVAX) and&nbsp;<b>JMP Group</b>(JMP).</p>\n<p>Both stocks move sharply week to week, yet are respecting a key technical support level, the10-week moving average.</p>\n<p>JMP cleared a 6.45buy pointin afour-month cup with handle. However,the handleformed near the middle of its cup pattern. You'd prefer to see the handle begin forming when a stock has climbed to within 5%, 10% or possibly 15% of its 52-week high.</p>\n<p>Notice how JMP still trades below the cup's left-side peak of 7.30 and its 52-week peak of 8.99.</p>\n<p>Dynavax is retreating fast after a big breakout past acup with handleand a 10.45entry point. Shares are still extended pastthe 5% buy zoneafter clearing 10.45.</p>","source":"lsy1610449120050","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cheap Stocks To Buy: Should You Watch These 5 Growth Stocks?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCheap Stocks To Buy: Should You Watch These 5 Growth Stocks?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-22 11:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.investors.com/research/cheap-stocks-to-buy/?src=A00220><strong>investors</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Bull market, bear market, or trend-less market? Regardless ofwhat stage of the market cycle we're in, some folks never tire of searching for cheap stocks to buy.\nAnd who doesn't love a bargain? After ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.investors.com/research/cheap-stocks-to-buy/?src=A00220\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"EVC":"超视野传播","CHS":"Chicos Fas Inc","LOMA":"Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina S.A.","WIT":"Wipro Limited","UMC":"联电"},"source_url":"https://www.investors.com/research/cheap-stocks-to-buy/?src=A00220","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1128033677","content_text":"Bull market, bear market, or trend-less market? Regardless ofwhat stage of the market cycle we're in, some folks never tire of searching for cheap stocks to buy.\nAnd who doesn't love a bargain? After all, the lure of finding a stock that triples from $1 to $3 a share, or quintuples from $5 to $25, may prove irresistible.\nAre there any unique problems or subtle challenges with this strategy of hunting cheap stocks to buy? Yes. Let's consider a few.\nHundreds of stocks trade at a \"low\" price on both the Nasdaq and the NYSE. So, how can you pick the winners consistently?\nHere's another problem: IBD research consistently finds that dozens, if not hundreds, of great stocks each year do not start out as penny shares. Most institutional money managers don't touch cheap stocks. Imagine a large-cap mutual fund trying to buy a meaningful stake in a stock that has been trading a dollar a share. If it has thin trading volume, the fund manager will have an awfully tough time accumulating shares without making a big impact on the stock price.\nSolid, increasing institutional buying makes upthe I in CAN SLIM, IBD's seven-factor paradigm ofsuccessful investing in growth stocks.\nCheap Stocks To Buy: First, Understand These Pitfalls\nAnother cold, hard truth that proponents of penny stocks don't tell you? Many low-priced shares stay low for a very long time.\nSo, if your hard-earned money is tied up in a 50-cent stock that fails to generate meaningful capital appreciation, you might not only be nursing a losing stock. You also face the lost opportunity of investing in atrue stock market leader in Leaderboardor a member of theIBD 50, theLong-Term Leaders, orIBD Big Cap 20.\nLet's considerZoom Video(ZM) and telemedicine pioneerTeladoc(TDOC) in 2020, after the coronavirus bear market ended. These two and many others traded at an \"expensive\" price when they broke out to new 52-week highs and began magnificent rallies. But the quality of their business, the supercharged growth in fundamentals, and significant buying by top-rated mutual funds affirmed that their premium share prices signaled a high level of quality.\nZoom Video, after clearing adeep cup baseat 107.44 in February 2020, went on to rise nearly sixfold to its 2020 peak at 588. Today? Zoom stock is forming anew baseand testing buying support at the50-day moving average. Last month, ZM joinedSwingTraderas a new position.\nTeladocroared past an 86.40proper buy pointin mid-January 2020. Seven months later, the stock hit 253, up 193%. Today? TDOC stock is trying to climb back above its key50-day moving average, a critical technical level of medium-term price support and price resistance. Like Zoom, Teladoc is also deep in the weeds ofbuilding a new base.\nZoom And Teladoc Aren't Alone\nLeaderboard memberAdobe(ADBE) cleared a 157.99 entry in afive-week flat basein the week ended Oct. 20, 2017. The megacap tech marked a new high of 536 in early September 2020 before cooling off. And the video editing, document management, and data analytics software giant recently staged anothernew breakoutpast anew buy point, this time at 525.54.\nADBE stock has rallied sharply, gaining more than 20%. Adobe has been a mainstay on theIBD Long-Term Leaders.\nStill, can you employ theCAN SLIM strategyfor cheap stocks to buy as well?\n5 Cheap Stocks To Watch And Buy\nTheIBD Stock Screenerfilters cheap stocks that not only trade at $10 or less per share. Some also carry many of the key fundamental, technical and fund ownership quality traits routinely seen among the greatest stock market winners.\nKeep in mind that liquidity is often thin. So, you might not get trade executions at an ideal price. If fund managers dump shares all at once to lock in profits, you might incur further losses when exiting the stock.\nSo, check the gap between a cheap stock's best bid and best ask prices, or the difference between what one investor is willing to pay and another is willing to sell. The smaller the gap between bid and ask prices, the less price slippage.\nAnd don't forget the No. 1 rule of investing:keep your losses small and under control.\nStock No. 1, screening for top IBDComposite Rating:Wipro(WIT). The India-based IT consultant has made a superb run-up since bottoming at 2.52 at the low of the coronavirus market crash in March 2020. Shares formed aflat basethat highlights an 8.42proper buy point. Now, WIT has cleared this correct entry.\nBuy With Rules\nThe5% buy zonegoes up to 8.83. So, WIT is on the verge of jumping out of the ideal buy range.\nTheComposite Ratingremains superlative at 97 on a scale of 1 (wizened) to 99 (wizardly). WIT also stands out with a 90Relative Strength Rating. A 94 RS Rating means Wipro has outrun 94% of all companies in the IBD database over the past 12 months.\nYou might ask: Why is the entry point exactly at 8.42?\nFor starters, we take the highest price on the left side of a flat base — in Wipro's case, 8.32 — then add a dime. Moving 10 cents above the base's high gives the individual trader a sense that large fund managers are earnestly accumulating shares. Again, you want the institutions working with you, not against you.\nPlease read this Investor's Corner for more insight into finding thecorrect buy point.\nWilliam O'Neil, founder of Investor's Business Daily, liked to use one-eighth of a point (or roughly 12 cents) as the amount a stock had to rise above a pivot point before he considered a stock as breaking out. Of course, until decimalization transformed the stock market at the dawn of the new millennium, the major U.S. exchanges quoted share prices in one-eighths, one-sixteenths and even one-32nds of a dollar.\nCheap Stock No. 2\nStock No. 2, screening for top IBD Composite Rating:Entravision Communications(EVC). The Santa Monica-based Spanish language media firm owns TV stations and FM and AM radio stations across nine states. The stock broke out of a 4.52entry pointin surging volume during the week ended May 21.\nThree weeks ago, the stock made a sound first test of buying support at the10-week moving averagenear 5.62. Yet this week, EVC is pulling back hard and eyeing another test of institutional support near that 10-week line, which has now risen to 6.34.\nBuying shares as close as possible to the 10-week moving average amid a healthy rebound offers the intrepid trader asecondary buy point.\nEntravision's IBD ratings include an 86 Composite, which is below a preferable level of 90 or higher; 98 Relative Strength; anup/down volume ratioof 1.5; and back to a solid A- forAccumulation/Distribution. The stock also pays a dividend; due to recent strong price gains, the annualized yield has dropped to 1.6%.\nThe company reported strong second-quarter results on Aug. 5. Earnings tripled to 9 cents a share as revenue vaulted 295% vs. a year ago to $178 million.\nPremium IBD Ratings Galore\nStock No. 3, screening for topComposite Rating:Loma Negra(LOMA). The Argentine cement, concrete, aggregates and lime supplier posted a 500% jump in first-quarter earnings vs. a year earlier to 24 cents a share. Sales accelerated to a 37% gain to $143 million, according toMarketSmith. TheIBD relative strength linebolted to new 52-week highs recently.\nLoma Negra briefly pulled back into the5% buy zoneafter clearing abase-on-base patternat 6.79. The buy zone goes up to 7.13. However, like other commodity stocks, LOMA has fallen sharply in recent days.\nIn short, don't chase the stock. Good time to wait and watch.\nLoma'sComposite Ratinghas fallen to an unsavory 69 rating. The 86 RS Rating is good but not great anymore.\nAn 86 RS score means over the past 12 months Loma has outperformed 86% of all companies in the IBD database.\nA Former Huge Winner In Apparel Retail\nStock No. 4, screening for topRelative Strength Rating:Chico's FAS(CHS). The former leader of IBD's retail apparel and shoes industry group is continuing to make atest of the 10-week lineafter clearing acup-without-handle basein March at 4.22.\nThe first and second rallies off the 10-week line — near 5.76 during the week ended July 23 — after astrong breakoutpose as secondary entry points.\nDue to the recent pullback, it's now beginning to look as if CHS will form anew base.\nAmong cheap apparel stocks to buy, Chico's sports a top-drawer 99 RS Rating. This means its relative strength is top-notch. Put another way, CHS has outperformed 99% of all companies in the IBD database over the past 12 months.\nOn the fundamentals side, at least eight quarters in a row of net losses by the Fort Myers, Fla., firm weigh on the drab 69Composite Rating. But sales rebounded 38% in the April-ended fiscal first quarter to $388 million. According to Yahoo Finance, one analyst thinks Chico's will post a net loss of 4 cents a share in the July-ended second quarter; another analyst targets an 11-cent loss. The women's apparel chain lost 40 cents a share in the year-ago quarter.\nThe consensus forecast calls for a 33% jump in the top line, however, to $407.4 million. Look for Q2 results in late August.\nChip Leader Stumbles\nStock No. 5, screening for Fastest Growing Earnings Per Share:United Microelectronics(UMC). The Taiwan-based integrated circuit maker has risen nearly fourfold after a July 2020 breakout around 3. Anew baseoffers an earlyentry pointat 9.92, 10 cents above the high in the week ended June 4.\nOn July 29, UMC stock broke out with an 8% gain and rallied into the5% buy zone, which goes up to 10.42 from the 9.92 buy point. But UMC has retreated sharply. On the bright side, UMC is holding above the key 10-week moving average. And it remains mildly above the 9.92breakout point.\nA key rule is to never let a stock that shows a double-digit percentage gain turn into afull round trip— even among cheap stocks.\nUnited's earnings per share have grown 50%, 350%, 225%, 167%, 400% and 100% vs. year-ago levels in the past six quarters on sales increases of 32%, 30%, 28%, 15%, 19% and 21%. Solid numbers for bothComposite Rating(94) and Relative Strength (95); however, these ratings are best used for selecting stocks to buy, not for timing any entries or exits.\nUMC holds a best-possible A grade for theSMR Rating, which measures sales, margins andreturn on equity.\nA Strong Second Quarter\nUnited Micro reported robust second-quarter results on July 28. According to Yahoo Finance, one analyst saw UMC notching a net profit of 13 cents per share while another saw 15 cents vs. 9 cents a year ago. The company exceeded both analysts' views with profit of 18 cents a share, doubling the 9 cents it earned a year earlier.\nSales grew 21% to $1.82 billion. This increase also marked a second quarter in a row of accelerating growth. The top line rose 15% in Q4 2020 and accelerated 19% in Q1 this year.\nMore Trading Ideas\nSeveral weeks ago, these two cheap stocks made either the \"Accelerating Sales\" or \"Top Relative Strength Rating\" segment ofIBD Stock Screener: Dynavax Technologies(DVAX) and JMP Group(JMP).\nBoth stocks move sharply week to week, yet are respecting a key technical support level, the10-week moving average.\nJMP cleared a 6.45buy pointin afour-month cup with handle. However,the handleformed near the middle of its cup pattern. You'd prefer to see the handle begin forming when a stock has climbed to within 5%, 10% or possibly 15% of its 52-week high.\nNotice how JMP still trades below the cup's left-side peak of 7.30 and its 52-week peak of 8.99.\nDynavax is retreating fast after a big breakout past acup with handleand a 10.45entry point. Shares are still extended pastthe 5% buy zoneafter clearing 10.45.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"CHS":0.9,"UMC":0.9,"EVC":0.9,"WIT":0.9,"LOMA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2164,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":831928604,"gmtCreate":1629281353608,"gmtModify":1676529989839,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4088936884410440","idStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/831928604","repostId":"1160063301","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1160063301","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1629279635,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1160063301?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-18 17:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Sees Delay In Its Shift Away From China Due To COVID-19: Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1160063301","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Apple is slowing plans to shift production from China to Vietnam as governments tighten border contr","content":"<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a></b>&nbsp;is slowing plans to shift production from&nbsp;<b>China</b>&nbsp;to&nbsp;<b>Vietnam</b>&nbsp;as governments tighten border controls to contain outbreaks of new variants of the coronavirus, Nikkei Asiareportedon Tuesday, citing sources.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;The Cupertino, California-based tech giant plans to start mass production of its latest&nbsp;<b>AirPods</b>&nbsp;earphones in China instead of Vietnam as previously planned.</p>\n<p>Apple reportedly still aims to move around 20% of new AirPods production to Vietnam at some point in the future.</p>\n<p>AirPods were among the first products that Apple began making in significant amounts in Vietnam after moving production there about two years ago during the peak of U.S.-China trade tensions.</p>\n<p>The&nbsp;<b>Tim Cook</b>-led company's plan to bring some&nbsp;<b>MacBook</b>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<b>iPad</b>&nbsp;production to Vietnam has also been put on hold.</p>\n<p>Apple is not alone, as other tech biggies such as Google parent&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a> and&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a> are facing similar delays, the Nikkei&nbsp;noted.</p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;Vietnam’s young labor force made it an ideal draw for U.S. based tech manufacturers, especially when Washington began imposing punitive tariffs on Chinese-made goods in 2018. Suppliers of Apple, Google, Amazon, Microsoft and&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DELL\">Dell Technologies Inc.</a> have already set up or expanded factories in the country over the past few years.</p>\n<p>Both China and Vietnam have adopted stricter border control measures this year, which has slowed the production shift between the two countries due to COVID-19 resurgence and government measures.</p>\n<p><b>Price Action:</b>&nbsp;Apple shares closed 0.62% lower at $150.19 on Tuesday.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Sees Delay In Its Shift Away From China Due To COVID-19: Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Sees Delay In Its Shift Away From China Due To COVID-19: Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-18 17:40</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a></b>&nbsp;is slowing plans to shift production from&nbsp;<b>China</b>&nbsp;to&nbsp;<b>Vietnam</b>&nbsp;as governments tighten border controls to contain outbreaks of new variants of the coronavirus, Nikkei Asiareportedon Tuesday, citing sources.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;The Cupertino, California-based tech giant plans to start mass production of its latest&nbsp;<b>AirPods</b>&nbsp;earphones in China instead of Vietnam as previously planned.</p>\n<p>Apple reportedly still aims to move around 20% of new AirPods production to Vietnam at some point in the future.</p>\n<p>AirPods were among the first products that Apple began making in significant amounts in Vietnam after moving production there about two years ago during the peak of U.S.-China trade tensions.</p>\n<p>The&nbsp;<b>Tim Cook</b>-led company's plan to bring some&nbsp;<b>MacBook</b>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<b>iPad</b>&nbsp;production to Vietnam has also been put on hold.</p>\n<p>Apple is not alone, as other tech biggies such as Google parent&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a> and&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a> are facing similar delays, the Nikkei&nbsp;noted.</p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;Vietnam’s young labor force made it an ideal draw for U.S. based tech manufacturers, especially when Washington began imposing punitive tariffs on Chinese-made goods in 2018. Suppliers of Apple, Google, Amazon, Microsoft and&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DELL\">Dell Technologies Inc.</a> have already set up or expanded factories in the country over the past few years.</p>\n<p>Both China and Vietnam have adopted stricter border control measures this year, which has slowed the production shift between the two countries due to COVID-19 resurgence and government measures.</p>\n<p><b>Price Action:</b>&nbsp;Apple shares closed 0.62% lower at $150.19 on Tuesday.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1160063301","content_text":"Apple is slowing plans to shift production from China to Vietnam as governments tighten border controls to contain outbreaks of new variants of the coronavirus, Nikkei Asiareportedon Tuesday, citing sources.\nWhat Happened: The Cupertino, California-based tech giant plans to start mass production of its latest AirPods earphones in China instead of Vietnam as previously planned.\nApple reportedly still aims to move around 20% of new AirPods production to Vietnam at some point in the future.\nAirPods were among the first products that Apple began making in significant amounts in Vietnam after moving production there about two years ago during the peak of U.S.-China trade tensions.\nThe Tim Cook-led company's plan to bring some MacBook and iPad production to Vietnam has also been put on hold.\nApple is not alone, as other tech biggies such as Google parent Alphabet and Amazon.com are facing similar delays, the Nikkei noted.\nWhy It Matters: Vietnam’s young labor force made it an ideal draw for U.S. based tech manufacturers, especially when Washington began imposing punitive tariffs on Chinese-made goods in 2018. Suppliers of Apple, Google, Amazon, Microsoft and Dell Technologies Inc. have already set up or expanded factories in the country over the past few years.\nBoth China and Vietnam have adopted stricter border control measures this year, which has slowed the production shift between the two countries due to COVID-19 resurgence and government measures.\nPrice Action: Apple shares closed 0.62% lower at $150.19 on Tuesday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2770,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":830143376,"gmtCreate":1629036276695,"gmtModify":1676529914449,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4088936884410440","idStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/830143376","repostId":"1138705612","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138705612","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628995730,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1138705612?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-15 10:48","market":"us","language":"en","title":"AMD, Intel, And Nvidia: Which Is The Best Chip Stock?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138705612","media":"seekingalpha","summary":"AMD's recent CPU and GPU offerings have been more competitive with Intel and NVIDIA's products.AMD’s EPYC server chips have proved to be comparable or even superior to certain Intel chips and have led to AMD gaining server CPU market share.Even so, Intel is the leader in the processor market and holds long-term advantages over AMD in R&D, marketing, and pricing.Nvidia is ahead of AMD in GPU technology and is leveraging its GPUs into adjacent end markets such as artificial intelligence.This left ","content":"<p><b>Summary</b></p>\n<ul>\n <li>AMD's recent CPU and GPU offerings have been more competitive with Intel and NVIDIA's products.</li>\n <li>AMD’s EPYC server chips have proved to be comparable or even superior to certain Intel chips and have led to AMD gaining server CPU market share.</li>\n <li>Even so, Intel is the leader in the processor market and holds long-term advantages over AMD in R&amp;D, marketing, and pricing.</li>\n <li>Nvidia is ahead of AMD in GPU technology and is leveraging its GPUs into adjacent end markets such as artificial intelligence.</li>\n</ul>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5a8f0aee0f3d10db76a1ee18fe604b40\" tg-width=\"1536\" tg-height=\"864\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Andy/iStock via Getty Images</span></p>\n<p>Intel (INTC) was once the microchip industry equivalent of the Colossus of Rhodes, a monument to the power of Moore’s law. However, the firm stumbled with its 10-nanometer process, and recently announced its 7-nm process will be delayed until 2023.</p>\n<p>This left the door open to Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD), and that firm has taken full advantage of the opportunity. AMD has taken a large share of the CPU market and is making inroads into the once nearly impenetrable server market.</p>\n<p>AMD now has seven consecutive quarters of double-digit revenue growth under its belt, and it appears the firm is gaining momentum: management now guides for 60% revenue growth for the full year, up from the 50% forecast provided in the previous quarter.</p>\n<p>However, AMD also competes with NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), and the latter company’s GPU technology is stealing market share. NVDA has also been successful in gaining access to adjacent markets with its GPUs, especially AI and automotive markets.</p>\n<p><b>The Ins And Outs of Intel</b></p>\n<p>An understanding of Intel also provides insights into AMD. This is due to the overlap between the two companies, particularly in regards to x86 chips. Intel developed the x86 chip in 1978. To satisfy demands by IBM that Intel would not be the sole supplier of the chips, INTC provided x86 instruction set architecture licensing to AMD.</p>\n<p>Consequently, Intel and AMD have a duopoly position in the PC and server markets, as nearly all computer software is written for x86 architecture. The result is that both have a wide moat related to the x86 ecosystem.</p>\n<p>Gaming consoles in particular are based on x86 architecture due to those platforms generally providing more powerful CPUs and GPUs with multiple compute cores. Like PCs, consoles operate with games that use x86 based software. Once again, this stifles potential competition from ARM-based devices.</p>\n<p>Until fairly recently, AMD was a distant second to INTC as a supplier of x86 chips. However, AMD teamed with Taiwan Semiconductor(NYSE:TSM)to use that manufacturer’s 7nm process to surpass INTC in process technology. Combined with AMD’s developing new innovative chip designs, this one-two punch resulted in INTC losing significant market share.</p>\n<p>At the end of Q1, AMD held 19.30% of the x86 desktop&nbsp;market, a 70 basis point gain year-over-year. In Q2 AMD corralled 8% of the server market, up from a 5%&nbsp;market&nbsp;share in Q4 of 2019.</p>\n<p>Despite these setbacks, it seems premature to view Intel as a moribund business. INTC is one of the largest semiconductor companies in the world. The firm dominates the server market, and still holds 60% of the global x86 CPU&nbsp;market.</p>\n<p>The company has an enormous R&amp;D budget, and it is expanding into new markets, primarily Artificial Intelligence, Field-Programmable Gate Array chips, and automotive offerings, through its acquisitions of Habana Labs, Altera, Movidius, and Mobileye.</p>\n<p>Investors should not be swayed by the claim that Intel’s new 10nm chips are inferior to 7nm solely on the basis that 7 is superior to 10. While once used to denote the technology level of a chip design, it has been misused to the point of being useless.</p>\n<p>However, there are a number of concerns that must be acknowledged. Intel lags competitors in the smartphone market. As consumers shift to mobile devices, this could result in a sustained headwind as smartphones take the place of PCs. On the other hand, it should be acknowledged that INTC’s server processor business has seen growth associated with the surge in mobile devices and cloud computing.</p>\n<p>Intel also faces increased competition from AMD in the data center space, as well as customers developing their own ARM-based chips for CPUs.</p>\n<p><b>An Overview of AMD</b></p>\n<p>In years past, INTC held the lion’s share of the x86 market. This was due in part to Intel’s leading-edge manufacturing combined with AMD’s wafer supply agreements with less than stellar GlobalFoundries.</p>\n<p>However, a seismic shift occurred due to three factors: driven by innovative designs, AMD brought competitive products to market, AMD shifted to TSMC for production, and Intel faced repeated manufacturing delays. The two charts below document the progress the company has made.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/903df41d5400c9807ff487a75a7e5450\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"989\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source:Q2 Earnings Presentation</span></p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/331cd14b666f520a62d0746d5fadfa5b\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"989\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source:Q2 Earnings Presentation</span></p>\n<p>Like Intel, AMD’s primary products are CPUs and GPUs. AMD’s chips are designed for PCs, game consoles, servers, and blockchain applications. And like INTC, AMD’s offerings are largely protected from competition due to the preponderance of software for PCs and servers being designed for x86 architecture.</p>\n<p>AMD’s strong growth has largely come at the expense of Intel as AMD has steadily chipped away at the former company’s CPU market share.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e7f8fbcab5da8a24d01d2b6408bd5686\" tg-width=\"576\" tg-height=\"336\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source:Seeking Alpha</span></p>\n<p>AMD’s focus on CPU and GPU semi-custom processor applications has resulted in their use in Microsoft Xbox and Sony PlayStation game consoles.</p>\n<p>In regards to PC integrated GPUs, AMD is roughly in parity with NVIDIA while INTC dominates with roughly 68% of the market.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/67a0fe74d986cf882623a8f39587d0d8\" tg-width=\"544\" tg-height=\"394\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source:tom'sHARDWARE</span></p>\n<p>However, NVIDIA dominates the discrete GPU space with an 80% plus market share with AMD sweeping up what is left. NVIDIA’s discrete GPUs are arguably superior to AMD’s (more on that later); therefore, investors should not look for growth here.</p>\n<p>Although AMD’s EPYC server CPU products were competitive with that of rivals, initially the company relied on aggressive pricing to promote its first generation of EPYC offerings. However, the EPYC line has gained wider acceptance, and with the Milan processors, the company is gaining market share. As server CPUs provide a better profit margin than the company’s other products, expansion into that space should aid in driving revenue.</p>\n<p>Late last year,AMD entered intoa deal&nbsp;to acquire&nbsp;Xilinx (XLNX), a leader in field programmable gate array (FPGA) chips. FPGAs can be used for a wide variety of applications. Because shifting to a competing FPGA provider requires retraining of engineers in software and design tools, customers are loath to make a switch to a competing vendor. Consequently, if the Xilinx deal goes through, AMD will have acquired a wide moat business. Management guides for operational efficiencies of approximately $300 million within 18 months of closing the transaction.</p>\n<p>The Xilinx acquisition should bolster AMD’s data center and artificial intelligence businesses.</p>\n<p>AMD agreed to acquire Xilinx for $35 billion in an all-stock transaction.</p>\n<p><b>A Survey of NVIDIA</b></p>\n<p>NVDA's focus on the graphics processing units market has led the company to a dominant position in the discrete GPU space. The firm is the leader in discrete GPUs for computing platforms, especially gaming consoles. The fact that Intel licensed intellectual property from NVIDIA to integrate GPUs into its PC chipset testifies to the lead the company maintains.</p>\n<p>The chart below provides a record of the burgeoning ASP the company has been able to command over the last half decade, beginning with the Pascal architecture in 2016, and progressing through Turing to Ampere.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/04fb1d71f9df02f6c63907fe784b2fd8\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"720\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source:AMD Investor Presentation</span></p>\n<p>The firm’s chips are also found in many high-end PCs, and NVDA has particular strength in the incipient AI and self-driving vehicle markets.</p>\n<p>GPUs are being teamed with CPUs to&nbsp;enhance&nbsp;computation workloads. This stratagem is designed to bolster the ability of AI systems to perform computationally intensive tasks. AI related to&nbsp;autonomous&nbsp;vehicles is a developing strength for NVIDIA. Another arena in which the firm is making its mark is in cloud</p>\n<p>AI and data centers pose the most likely avenue of growth for NVDA. To strengthen its position in both businesses, the company moved last year to acquire ARM Holdings (ARMHF) from parent company Softbank for $40 billion.</p>\n<p>ARM is the globe’s largest licensor of chip designs. Its chips are ubiquitous and can be found in mobile phones, smart TVs, and tablet computers. 160 billion chips have been made using ARM designs.</p>\n<p>Perhaps of equal importance is that 13 million developers work with ARM devices. To place that in context, NVDA has 2 million developers working on its array of devices.</p>\n<p>Unfortunately for investors, bothChinaand theU.K.are reportedly balking at approving the deal.</p>\n<p><b>Head-To-Head Comparisons</b></p>\n<p><b>Valuation Metrics</b></p>\n<p>The following chart provides a variety of metrics related to each stock's valuation. All data labeled forward is analysts’ next fiscal year consensus estimate.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1bdeabcd2ea473601fbaaaa03235de77\" tg-width=\"576\" tg-height=\"336\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source:Seeking Alpha Premium/ chart by author</span></p>\n<p>Next, I’m using a graph to provide PEG ratios for the three companies. As there can be fairly wide variations in PEG ratios due to analysts’ inputs, I prefer that readers have access to multiple sources when I find wide variance in the ratio.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/884fc2142d97afcc9e2308e50058dd45\" tg-width=\"576\" tg-height=\"336\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Chart by author</span></p>\n<p>Note that Seeking Alpha provides a three to five-year PEG, Schwab simply lists its metric as a PEG ratio, while Yahoo! Finance calculates a five-year ratio. This could explain some of the variance in the numbers provided.</p>\n<p>Perusing the first chart, it is obvious that NVDA is the most overvalued. It is also interesting to note that in the current P/E and the forward price/cash flow estimates show AMD as valued near the sector median.</p>\n<p>Count me as an investor that places great emphasis on a stocks PEG Ratio. Viewing the second chart, AMD has the best PEG of the three companies. I also note that analysts from each source calculated AMD’s PEG ratio as better than the sector median.</p>\n<p>Do not misinterpret my findings. While INTC has a lower valuation in many respects, when considering other factors, I rate AMD higher overall. In other words, it is not the cheapest valuation but the best valuation, for lack of a better means to articulate my view.</p>\n<p><b>=Advantage AMD</b></p>\n<p><b>Analysts’ Price Targets</b></p>\n<p>NVIDIA shares currently trade for $202.95. The average 12-month price target of 33 analysts is $186.49. The average price target of the 17 analysts that rated the stock following the latest earnings report is $210.53, about 3.7% above the current price of the stock.</p>\n<p>AMD shares currently trade for $107.58. The average 12-month price target of 28 analysts is $108.56. The average price target of the 11 analysts that rated the stock following the latest earnings report is $117.27, roughly 9% above the prevailing share price.</p>\n<p>Intel shares currently trade for $54.05. The average 12-month price target of 34 analysts is $59.86. The average price target of the 16 analysts that rated the stock following the latest earnings report is $58.97, a 9% premium over the current share price.</p>\n<p>Investors should be aware that it has been nearly three months since NVDA posted quarterly earnings while INTC and AMD reported recently.</p>\n<p><b>=Tie AMD/INTC</b></p>\n<p><b>Growth Rates</b></p>\n<p>The next chart provides data for growth rates. Unless otherwise noted, the metrics reflect analysts' average two-year forecasts.</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e8ae1b79b3731a985fc209e626ca4886\" tg-width=\"577\" tg-height=\"337\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"><span>Source:Seeking Alpha Premium/ Chart by author</span></p>\n<p>While investors familiar with these three companies would expect INTC to perform poorly in relation to NVDA and AMD in regarding growth, in several cases Intel is projected to experience negative growth rates.</p>\n<p>Advanced Micro Devices projected growth leads that of NVIDIA in every category, and at times by very wide margins.</p>\n<p><b>=Advantage AMD</b></p>\n<p>I considered providing a chart outlining the profitability of each company; however, suffice it to say that each is highly profitable, and that a juxtaposition of the three would result in a tie.</p>\n<p>I often provide a comparison that breaks down dividend metrics, but AMD does not pay a dividend, and NVDA has an anemic yield. INTC currently yields about 2.6%. The dividend is well funded.</p>\n<p><b>Debt Metrics</b></p>\n<p>NVIDIA had $12.67 billion in cash and $5.96 billion at the end of the last quarter. Should the ARM acquisition meet approval, the deal is structured so that $21 billion of the $40 billion purchase price will be in stock.</p>\n<p>AMD has restructured its debt resulting in reduced interest costs. AMD had about $3.8 billion in cash and $313 million in long-term debt at the end of the most recent quarter.</p>\n<p>Intel's has solid investment-grade credit ratings. The company held nearly $24.86 billion cash at the end of the last quarter and had $31.7 billion long-term debt.</p>\n<p>All three firms have strong financial positions. Weighing the possibility that NVDA and AMD may add debt due to prospective acquisitions, I am rating the three firms as equals.</p>\n<p><b>R&amp;D Budgets</b></p>\n<p>This is the first time I have&nbsp;compared&nbsp;the R&amp;D budgets of companies for a head-to-head showdown. However, in the semiconductor industry, that can be of pivotal importance.</p>\n<p>Last fiscal year, Intel devoted over $13.5 billion to R&amp;D, NVDA spent nearly $2.83 billion, and AMD budgeted a bit over $1.9 billion on research and development.</p>\n<p>AMD is at a clear disadvantage, and that weakness is magnified because it often competes against INTC and NVDA in different arenas. It should be noted that a portion of Intel’s R&amp;D is funneled to its foundry business. Nevertheless, it is the clear winner here, and AMD is the obvious loser.</p>\n<p>I should add that NVDA is chipping away at AMD’s share of the discrete GPU market, and I believe that trend will continue, in part due to the disparity in R&amp;D budgets.</p>\n<p><b>=Advantage INTC</b></p>\n<p><b>Bottom Line: Which Is The Best Chip Stock?</b></p>\n<p>To arrive at an answer, much depends on whether NVIDIA can complete its acquisition of ARM.</p>\n<p>Because ARM processors are more power and cost-efficient than x86 chips, NVDA could gain market share in the data center space. Since around a third of Intel’s revenue flows from data centers, that could represent a headwind for INTC and a positive for NVDA. However, there is a good chance the deal will fail to close.</p>\n<p>The degree of success Intel finds as its&nbsp;planned&nbsp;foundries come online is another factor that should be weighed.</p>\n<p>A development to be weighed is that AMD has now reached parity with INTC in the PC market in terms of the quality of its products. Furthermore, AMD is gaining market share in the server market, and I expect that trend to continue.</p>\n<p>On the other hand, AMD is losing share in the discrete GPU market to NVDA. NVDA has a technological lead in that space which will probably continue.</p>\n<p>While AMD and NVDA are seen as growth machines, one should not ignore that Intel’s Internet of Things business increased by 47% in the last quarter. Mobileye also saw a surge in growth with revenue increasing 124%. Although these businesses only totaled $1.3 billion in revenue, a fraction of Intel's total revenue of $18.5 billion, they still represent areas of high growth.</p>\n<p>However, note the header refers to “chip stock.” Consequently, technological advantages are but one part of the puzzle. Any investment decision must take current valuations and prospective growth rates into account.</p>\n<p>With that in mind, I must rate NVIDIA as a HOLD due to current valuation and growth estimates. Note my rating is based on the current valuation of the stock. I acknowledge the exemplary leadership of the company and believe the long-term prospect for the stock is excellent.</p>\n<p>I also rate INTC as a HOLD. I previously rated the company as a buy. While I still believe the firm will serve long-term investors well, I now believe its recovery will unfold over a long time span, and better opportunities are available.</p>\n<p>I rate AMD as a BUY. This is based on the current valuations and growth rates outlined in this article. I’ll add that those metrics are buttressed by my perception that as Intel works on its recovery, AMD is likely to chip away at market share.</p>\n<p>For additional insights into the technological aspects of an investment in AMD and INTC, I recommend an excellent article by SA&nbsp;contributor&nbsp;Keyanoush Razavidinani.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>AMD, Intel, And Nvidia: Which Is The Best Chip Stock?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAMD, Intel, And Nvidia: Which Is The Best Chip Stock?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-15 10:48 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4448637-amd-intel-nvidia-best-chip-stock><strong>seekingalpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Summary\n\nAMD's recent CPU and GPU offerings have been more competitive with Intel and NVIDIA's products.\nAMD’s EPYC server chips have proved to be comparable or even superior to certain Intel chips ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4448637-amd-intel-nvidia-best-chip-stock\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/dad74e350b9b09d45929989f896aaa9d","relate_stocks":{"INTC":"英特尔","NVDA":"英伟达","AMD":"美国超微公司"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4448637-amd-intel-nvidia-best-chip-stock","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138705612","content_text":"Summary\n\nAMD's recent CPU and GPU offerings have been more competitive with Intel and NVIDIA's products.\nAMD’s EPYC server chips have proved to be comparable or even superior to certain Intel chips and have led to AMD gaining server CPU market share.\nEven so, Intel is the leader in the processor market and holds long-term advantages over AMD in R&D, marketing, and pricing.\nNvidia is ahead of AMD in GPU technology and is leveraging its GPUs into adjacent end markets such as artificial intelligence.\n\nAndy/iStock via Getty Images\nIntel (INTC) was once the microchip industry equivalent of the Colossus of Rhodes, a monument to the power of Moore’s law. However, the firm stumbled with its 10-nanometer process, and recently announced its 7-nm process will be delayed until 2023.\nThis left the door open to Advanced Micro Devices Inc. (AMD), and that firm has taken full advantage of the opportunity. AMD has taken a large share of the CPU market and is making inroads into the once nearly impenetrable server market.\nAMD now has seven consecutive quarters of double-digit revenue growth under its belt, and it appears the firm is gaining momentum: management now guides for 60% revenue growth for the full year, up from the 50% forecast provided in the previous quarter.\nHowever, AMD also competes with NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA), and the latter company’s GPU technology is stealing market share. NVDA has also been successful in gaining access to adjacent markets with its GPUs, especially AI and automotive markets.\nThe Ins And Outs of Intel\nAn understanding of Intel also provides insights into AMD. This is due to the overlap between the two companies, particularly in regards to x86 chips. Intel developed the x86 chip in 1978. To satisfy demands by IBM that Intel would not be the sole supplier of the chips, INTC provided x86 instruction set architecture licensing to AMD.\nConsequently, Intel and AMD have a duopoly position in the PC and server markets, as nearly all computer software is written for x86 architecture. The result is that both have a wide moat related to the x86 ecosystem.\nGaming consoles in particular are based on x86 architecture due to those platforms generally providing more powerful CPUs and GPUs with multiple compute cores. Like PCs, consoles operate with games that use x86 based software. Once again, this stifles potential competition from ARM-based devices.\nUntil fairly recently, AMD was a distant second to INTC as a supplier of x86 chips. However, AMD teamed with Taiwan Semiconductor(NYSE:TSM)to use that manufacturer’s 7nm process to surpass INTC in process technology. Combined with AMD’s developing new innovative chip designs, this one-two punch resulted in INTC losing significant market share.\nAt the end of Q1, AMD held 19.30% of the x86 desktop market, a 70 basis point gain year-over-year. In Q2 AMD corralled 8% of the server market, up from a 5% market share in Q4 of 2019.\nDespite these setbacks, it seems premature to view Intel as a moribund business. INTC is one of the largest semiconductor companies in the world. The firm dominates the server market, and still holds 60% of the global x86 CPU market.\nThe company has an enormous R&D budget, and it is expanding into new markets, primarily Artificial Intelligence, Field-Programmable Gate Array chips, and automotive offerings, through its acquisitions of Habana Labs, Altera, Movidius, and Mobileye.\nInvestors should not be swayed by the claim that Intel’s new 10nm chips are inferior to 7nm solely on the basis that 7 is superior to 10. While once used to denote the technology level of a chip design, it has been misused to the point of being useless.\nHowever, there are a number of concerns that must be acknowledged. Intel lags competitors in the smartphone market. As consumers shift to mobile devices, this could result in a sustained headwind as smartphones take the place of PCs. On the other hand, it should be acknowledged that INTC’s server processor business has seen growth associated with the surge in mobile devices and cloud computing.\nIntel also faces increased competition from AMD in the data center space, as well as customers developing their own ARM-based chips for CPUs.\nAn Overview of AMD\nIn years past, INTC held the lion’s share of the x86 market. This was due in part to Intel’s leading-edge manufacturing combined with AMD’s wafer supply agreements with less than stellar GlobalFoundries.\nHowever, a seismic shift occurred due to three factors: driven by innovative designs, AMD brought competitive products to market, AMD shifted to TSMC for production, and Intel faced repeated manufacturing delays. The two charts below document the progress the company has made.\nSource:Q2 Earnings Presentation\nSource:Q2 Earnings Presentation\nLike Intel, AMD’s primary products are CPUs and GPUs. AMD’s chips are designed for PCs, game consoles, servers, and blockchain applications. And like INTC, AMD’s offerings are largely protected from competition due to the preponderance of software for PCs and servers being designed for x86 architecture.\nAMD’s strong growth has largely come at the expense of Intel as AMD has steadily chipped away at the former company’s CPU market share.\nSource:Seeking Alpha\nAMD’s focus on CPU and GPU semi-custom processor applications has resulted in their use in Microsoft Xbox and Sony PlayStation game consoles.\nIn regards to PC integrated GPUs, AMD is roughly in parity with NVIDIA while INTC dominates with roughly 68% of the market.\nSource:tom'sHARDWARE\nHowever, NVIDIA dominates the discrete GPU space with an 80% plus market share with AMD sweeping up what is left. NVIDIA’s discrete GPUs are arguably superior to AMD’s (more on that later); therefore, investors should not look for growth here.\nAlthough AMD’s EPYC server CPU products were competitive with that of rivals, initially the company relied on aggressive pricing to promote its first generation of EPYC offerings. However, the EPYC line has gained wider acceptance, and with the Milan processors, the company is gaining market share. As server CPUs provide a better profit margin than the company’s other products, expansion into that space should aid in driving revenue.\nLate last year,AMD entered intoa deal to acquire Xilinx (XLNX), a leader in field programmable gate array (FPGA) chips. FPGAs can be used for a wide variety of applications. Because shifting to a competing FPGA provider requires retraining of engineers in software and design tools, customers are loath to make a switch to a competing vendor. Consequently, if the Xilinx deal goes through, AMD will have acquired a wide moat business. Management guides for operational efficiencies of approximately $300 million within 18 months of closing the transaction.\nThe Xilinx acquisition should bolster AMD’s data center and artificial intelligence businesses.\nAMD agreed to acquire Xilinx for $35 billion in an all-stock transaction.\nA Survey of NVIDIA\nNVDA's focus on the graphics processing units market has led the company to a dominant position in the discrete GPU space. The firm is the leader in discrete GPUs for computing platforms, especially gaming consoles. The fact that Intel licensed intellectual property from NVIDIA to integrate GPUs into its PC chipset testifies to the lead the company maintains.\nThe chart below provides a record of the burgeoning ASP the company has been able to command over the last half decade, beginning with the Pascal architecture in 2016, and progressing through Turing to Ampere.\nSource:AMD Investor Presentation\nThe firm’s chips are also found in many high-end PCs, and NVDA has particular strength in the incipient AI and self-driving vehicle markets.\nGPUs are being teamed with CPUs to enhance computation workloads. This stratagem is designed to bolster the ability of AI systems to perform computationally intensive tasks. AI related to autonomous vehicles is a developing strength for NVIDIA. Another arena in which the firm is making its mark is in cloud\nAI and data centers pose the most likely avenue of growth for NVDA. To strengthen its position in both businesses, the company moved last year to acquire ARM Holdings (ARMHF) from parent company Softbank for $40 billion.\nARM is the globe’s largest licensor of chip designs. Its chips are ubiquitous and can be found in mobile phones, smart TVs, and tablet computers. 160 billion chips have been made using ARM designs.\nPerhaps of equal importance is that 13 million developers work with ARM devices. To place that in context, NVDA has 2 million developers working on its array of devices.\nUnfortunately for investors, bothChinaand theU.K.are reportedly balking at approving the deal.\nHead-To-Head Comparisons\nValuation Metrics\nThe following chart provides a variety of metrics related to each stock's valuation. All data labeled forward is analysts’ next fiscal year consensus estimate.\nSource:Seeking Alpha Premium/ chart by author\nNext, I’m using a graph to provide PEG ratios for the three companies. As there can be fairly wide variations in PEG ratios due to analysts’ inputs, I prefer that readers have access to multiple sources when I find wide variance in the ratio.\nChart by author\nNote that Seeking Alpha provides a three to five-year PEG, Schwab simply lists its metric as a PEG ratio, while Yahoo! Finance calculates a five-year ratio. This could explain some of the variance in the numbers provided.\nPerusing the first chart, it is obvious that NVDA is the most overvalued. It is also interesting to note that in the current P/E and the forward price/cash flow estimates show AMD as valued near the sector median.\nCount me as an investor that places great emphasis on a stocks PEG Ratio. Viewing the second chart, AMD has the best PEG of the three companies. I also note that analysts from each source calculated AMD’s PEG ratio as better than the sector median.\nDo not misinterpret my findings. While INTC has a lower valuation in many respects, when considering other factors, I rate AMD higher overall. In other words, it is not the cheapest valuation but the best valuation, for lack of a better means to articulate my view.\n=Advantage AMD\nAnalysts’ Price Targets\nNVIDIA shares currently trade for $202.95. The average 12-month price target of 33 analysts is $186.49. The average price target of the 17 analysts that rated the stock following the latest earnings report is $210.53, about 3.7% above the current price of the stock.\nAMD shares currently trade for $107.58. The average 12-month price target of 28 analysts is $108.56. The average price target of the 11 analysts that rated the stock following the latest earnings report is $117.27, roughly 9% above the prevailing share price.\nIntel shares currently trade for $54.05. The average 12-month price target of 34 analysts is $59.86. The average price target of the 16 analysts that rated the stock following the latest earnings report is $58.97, a 9% premium over the current share price.\nInvestors should be aware that it has been nearly three months since NVDA posted quarterly earnings while INTC and AMD reported recently.\n=Tie AMD/INTC\nGrowth Rates\nThe next chart provides data for growth rates. Unless otherwise noted, the metrics reflect analysts' average two-year forecasts.\nSource:Seeking Alpha Premium/ Chart by author\nWhile investors familiar with these three companies would expect INTC to perform poorly in relation to NVDA and AMD in regarding growth, in several cases Intel is projected to experience negative growth rates.\nAdvanced Micro Devices projected growth leads that of NVIDIA in every category, and at times by very wide margins.\n=Advantage AMD\nI considered providing a chart outlining the profitability of each company; however, suffice it to say that each is highly profitable, and that a juxtaposition of the three would result in a tie.\nI often provide a comparison that breaks down dividend metrics, but AMD does not pay a dividend, and NVDA has an anemic yield. INTC currently yields about 2.6%. The dividend is well funded.\nDebt Metrics\nNVIDIA had $12.67 billion in cash and $5.96 billion at the end of the last quarter. Should the ARM acquisition meet approval, the deal is structured so that $21 billion of the $40 billion purchase price will be in stock.\nAMD has restructured its debt resulting in reduced interest costs. AMD had about $3.8 billion in cash and $313 million in long-term debt at the end of the most recent quarter.\nIntel's has solid investment-grade credit ratings. The company held nearly $24.86 billion cash at the end of the last quarter and had $31.7 billion long-term debt.\nAll three firms have strong financial positions. Weighing the possibility that NVDA and AMD may add debt due to prospective acquisitions, I am rating the three firms as equals.\nR&D Budgets\nThis is the first time I have compared the R&D budgets of companies for a head-to-head showdown. However, in the semiconductor industry, that can be of pivotal importance.\nLast fiscal year, Intel devoted over $13.5 billion to R&D, NVDA spent nearly $2.83 billion, and AMD budgeted a bit over $1.9 billion on research and development.\nAMD is at a clear disadvantage, and that weakness is magnified because it often competes against INTC and NVDA in different arenas. It should be noted that a portion of Intel’s R&D is funneled to its foundry business. Nevertheless, it is the clear winner here, and AMD is the obvious loser.\nI should add that NVDA is chipping away at AMD’s share of the discrete GPU market, and I believe that trend will continue, in part due to the disparity in R&D budgets.\n=Advantage INTC\nBottom Line: Which Is The Best Chip Stock?\nTo arrive at an answer, much depends on whether NVIDIA can complete its acquisition of ARM.\nBecause ARM processors are more power and cost-efficient than x86 chips, NVDA could gain market share in the data center space. Since around a third of Intel’s revenue flows from data centers, that could represent a headwind for INTC and a positive for NVDA. However, there is a good chance the deal will fail to close.\nThe degree of success Intel finds as its planned foundries come online is another factor that should be weighed.\nA development to be weighed is that AMD has now reached parity with INTC in the PC market in terms of the quality of its products. Furthermore, AMD is gaining market share in the server market, and I expect that trend to continue.\nOn the other hand, AMD is losing share in the discrete GPU market to NVDA. NVDA has a technological lead in that space which will probably continue.\nWhile AMD and NVDA are seen as growth machines, one should not ignore that Intel’s Internet of Things business increased by 47% in the last quarter. Mobileye also saw a surge in growth with revenue increasing 124%. Although these businesses only totaled $1.3 billion in revenue, a fraction of Intel's total revenue of $18.5 billion, they still represent areas of high growth.\nHowever, note the header refers to “chip stock.” Consequently, technological advantages are but one part of the puzzle. Any investment decision must take current valuations and prospective growth rates into account.\nWith that in mind, I must rate NVIDIA as a HOLD due to current valuation and growth estimates. Note my rating is based on the current valuation of the stock. I acknowledge the exemplary leadership of the company and believe the long-term prospect for the stock is excellent.\nI also rate INTC as a HOLD. I previously rated the company as a buy. While I still believe the firm will serve long-term investors well, I now believe its recovery will unfold over a long time span, and better opportunities are available.\nI rate AMD as a BUY. This is based on the current valuations and growth rates outlined in this article. I’ll add that those metrics are buttressed by my perception that as Intel works on its recovery, AMD is likely to chip away at market share.\nFor additional insights into the technological aspects of an investment in AMD and INTC, I recommend an excellent article by SA contributor Keyanoush Razavidinani.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"NVDA":0.9,"INTC":0.9,"AMD":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1827,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":830905754,"gmtCreate":1628997510978,"gmtModify":1676529907253,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4088936884410440","idStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/830905754","repostId":"2159145532","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2841,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":892838230,"gmtCreate":1628647249920,"gmtModify":1676529807852,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4088936884410440","idStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/892838230","repostId":"1195651017","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1195651017","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1628638405,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1195651017?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-11 07:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Toplines After Hours US Market on Tuesday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1195651017","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. stock index futures were flat during overnight trading on Tuesday, after the Dow and S&P 500 cl","content":"<p>U.S. stock index futures were flat during overnight trading on Tuesday, after the Dow and S&amp;P 500 closed at&nbsp;record highs&nbsp;following the Senate passing the$1 trillion infrastructure bill.</p>\n<p>Futures contracts tied to the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/.DJI\">DJIA</a> were slightly higher. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/.SPX\">S&amp;P 500</a> futures and Nasdaq 100 futures were flat.</p>\n<p>At 7:30&nbsp;p.m. ET, Dow e-minis were down 14 points, or 0.04%, S&amp;P 500 e-minis were down 2.50 points, or 0.06%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 8.25 points, or 0.05%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb78d3b983aa4d779cf3b1bdc234bd42\" tg-width=\"1125\" tg-height=\"413\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>Stocks making the biggest moves after hours:</b></p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WW\">Weight Watchers International Inc</a>&nbsp;23.2% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.12, which may not compare to the analyst estimate of $0.65. Revenue for the quarter came in at $311 million versus the consensus estimate of $337.1 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UPST\">Upstart Holdings, Inc.</a> 17.9% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.62, $0.37 better than the analyst estimate of $0.25. Revenue for the quarter came in at $194 million versus the consensus estimate of $157.76 million. Upstart Holdings sees Q3 2021 revenue of $205-215 million, versus the consensus of $161.6 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ONTF\">ON24, Inc.</a> 14.9% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.04, $0.04 better than the analyst estimate of $0.00. Revenue for the quarter came in at $52.1 million versus the consensus estimate of $51.03 million. ON24, Inc. sees Q3 2021 EPS of ($0.09)-($0.07), versus the consensus of ($0.05). ON24, Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $47.5-48.5 million, versus the consensus of $51.2 million. ON24, Inc. sees FY2021 EPS of ($0.13)-($0.06), versus the consensus of ($0.04). ON24, Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $201.2-204.2 million, versus the consensus of $209.2 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LPRO\">Open Lending Corporation</a> 18.2% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.60, $0.43 better than the analyst estimate of $0.17. Revenue for the quarter came in at $61.1 million versus the consensus estimate of $48.98 million. Open Lending Corp. sees FY2021 revenue of $184-234 million, versus the consensus of $216 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FUBO\">fuboTV Inc.</a> 12.1% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of ($0.38), $0.12 better than the analyst estimate of ($0.50). Revenue for the quarter came in at $130.9 million versus the consensus estimate of $118.88 million. fuboTV Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $140-144 million, versus the consensus of $126.9 million. fuboTV Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $560-570 million, versus the consensus of $531.7 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRVI\">Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc.</a> 7.4% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.44, $0.13 better than the analyst estimate of $0.31. Revenue for the quarter came in at $217.8 million versus the consensus estimate of $192.29 million. Maravai LifeSciences sees FY2021 revenue of $745-770 million, versus the consensus of $709.65 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TDUP\">ThredUp Inc.</a> 7.3% HIGHER; Another record-setting quarter with 27% year-over-year revenue growth</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GTES\">Gates Industrial Corp PLC</a> 6.2% LOWER; announced today that certain selling stockholders affiliated with The Blackstone Group Inc. have commenced a secondary offering of 25,000,000 of Gates' ordinary shares. In connection with the offering, the selling stockholders intend to grant to the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 3,750,000 additional ordinary shares.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SKIN\">The Beauty Health Corp.</a> 5.3% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of ($1.52), versus ($0.30) reported last year. Revenue for the quarter came in at $66.5 million, versus $14.1 million reported last year.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCFE\">McAfee Corp.</a> 3.8% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.21, $0.03 better than the analyst estimate of $0.18. Revenue for the quarter came in at $467 million versus the consensus estimate of $433.99 million. McAfee Corp. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $461-467 million, versus the consensus of $442.8 million. McAfee Corp. sees FY2021 revenue of $1.84-1.85 billion, versus the consensus of $1.79 billion.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/OLO\">Olo Inc.</a> 3.7% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.03, $0.02 better than the analyst estimate of $0.01. Revenue for the quarter came in at $35.9 million versus the consensus estimate of $34.03 million. Olo Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $36-36.5 million, versus the consensus of $34.65 million. Olo Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $144.7-145.7 million, versus the consensus of $140.78 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LU\">Lufax</a> 1.9% HIGHER;&nbsp;Morgan Stanley&nbsp;upgraded from Equalweight to Overweight with a price target of $13.00 (from $14.80).</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COIN\">Coinbase Global, Inc.</a> 0.7% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $6.42, $4.18 better than the analyst estimate of $2.24. Revenue for the quarter came in at $2.23 billion versus the consensus estimate of $1.77 billion.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Toplines After Hours US Market on Tuesday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nToplines After Hours US Market on Tuesday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-11 07:33</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>U.S. stock index futures were flat during overnight trading on Tuesday, after the Dow and S&amp;P 500 closed at&nbsp;record highs&nbsp;following the Senate passing the$1 trillion infrastructure bill.</p>\n<p>Futures contracts tied to the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/.DJI\">DJIA</a> were slightly higher. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/.SPX\">S&amp;P 500</a> futures and Nasdaq 100 futures were flat.</p>\n<p>At 7:30&nbsp;p.m. ET, Dow e-minis were down 14 points, or 0.04%, S&amp;P 500 e-minis were down 2.50 points, or 0.06%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 8.25 points, or 0.05%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb78d3b983aa4d779cf3b1bdc234bd42\" tg-width=\"1125\" tg-height=\"413\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>Stocks making the biggest moves after hours:</b></p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WW\">Weight Watchers International Inc</a>&nbsp;23.2% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.12, which may not compare to the analyst estimate of $0.65. Revenue for the quarter came in at $311 million versus the consensus estimate of $337.1 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UPST\">Upstart Holdings, Inc.</a> 17.9% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.62, $0.37 better than the analyst estimate of $0.25. Revenue for the quarter came in at $194 million versus the consensus estimate of $157.76 million. Upstart Holdings sees Q3 2021 revenue of $205-215 million, versus the consensus of $161.6 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ONTF\">ON24, Inc.</a> 14.9% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.04, $0.04 better than the analyst estimate of $0.00. Revenue for the quarter came in at $52.1 million versus the consensus estimate of $51.03 million. ON24, Inc. sees Q3 2021 EPS of ($0.09)-($0.07), versus the consensus of ($0.05). ON24, Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $47.5-48.5 million, versus the consensus of $51.2 million. ON24, Inc. sees FY2021 EPS of ($0.13)-($0.06), versus the consensus of ($0.04). ON24, Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $201.2-204.2 million, versus the consensus of $209.2 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LPRO\">Open Lending Corporation</a> 18.2% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.60, $0.43 better than the analyst estimate of $0.17. Revenue for the quarter came in at $61.1 million versus the consensus estimate of $48.98 million. Open Lending Corp. sees FY2021 revenue of $184-234 million, versus the consensus of $216 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FUBO\">fuboTV Inc.</a> 12.1% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of ($0.38), $0.12 better than the analyst estimate of ($0.50). Revenue for the quarter came in at $130.9 million versus the consensus estimate of $118.88 million. fuboTV Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $140-144 million, versus the consensus of $126.9 million. fuboTV Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $560-570 million, versus the consensus of $531.7 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRVI\">Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc.</a> 7.4% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.44, $0.13 better than the analyst estimate of $0.31. Revenue for the quarter came in at $217.8 million versus the consensus estimate of $192.29 million. Maravai LifeSciences sees FY2021 revenue of $745-770 million, versus the consensus of $709.65 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TDUP\">ThredUp Inc.</a> 7.3% HIGHER; Another record-setting quarter with 27% year-over-year revenue growth</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GTES\">Gates Industrial Corp PLC</a> 6.2% LOWER; announced today that certain selling stockholders affiliated with The Blackstone Group Inc. have commenced a secondary offering of 25,000,000 of Gates' ordinary shares. In connection with the offering, the selling stockholders intend to grant to the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 3,750,000 additional ordinary shares.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SKIN\">The Beauty Health Corp.</a> 5.3% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of ($1.52), versus ($0.30) reported last year. Revenue for the quarter came in at $66.5 million, versus $14.1 million reported last year.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCFE\">McAfee Corp.</a> 3.8% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.21, $0.03 better than the analyst estimate of $0.18. Revenue for the quarter came in at $467 million versus the consensus estimate of $433.99 million. McAfee Corp. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $461-467 million, versus the consensus of $442.8 million. McAfee Corp. sees FY2021 revenue of $1.84-1.85 billion, versus the consensus of $1.79 billion.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/OLO\">Olo Inc.</a> 3.7% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.03, $0.02 better than the analyst estimate of $0.01. Revenue for the quarter came in at $35.9 million versus the consensus estimate of $34.03 million. Olo Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $36-36.5 million, versus the consensus of $34.65 million. Olo Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $144.7-145.7 million, versus the consensus of $140.78 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LU\">Lufax</a> 1.9% HIGHER;&nbsp;Morgan Stanley&nbsp;upgraded from Equalweight to Overweight with a price target of $13.00 (from $14.80).</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COIN\">Coinbase Global, Inc.</a> 0.7% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $6.42, $4.18 better than the analyst estimate of $2.24. Revenue for the quarter came in at $2.23 billion versus the consensus estimate of $1.77 billion.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ONTF":"ON24, Inc.","SKIN":"The Beauty Health Corp.",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯","GTES":"Gates Industrial Corp PLC","UPST":"Upstart Holdings, Inc.","TDUP":"ThredUp Inc.","NDX":"纳斯达克100指数",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","WW":"WW International, Inc.","COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc.","MCFE":"McAfee Corp.","FUBO":"fuboTV Inc.","OLO":"PowerShares DB Crude Oil Long ET","LPRO":"Open Lending Corporation","MRVI":"Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc.","LU":"陆金所"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1195651017","content_text":"U.S. stock index futures were flat during overnight trading on Tuesday, after the Dow and S&P 500 closed at record highs following the Senate passing the$1 trillion infrastructure bill.\nFutures contracts tied to the DJIA were slightly higher. S&P 500 futures and Nasdaq 100 futures were flat.\nAt 7:30 p.m. ET, Dow e-minis were down 14 points, or 0.04%, S&P 500 e-minis were down 2.50 points, or 0.06%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 8.25 points, or 0.05%.\nStocks making the biggest moves after hours:\nWeight Watchers International Inc 23.2% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.12, which may not compare to the analyst estimate of $0.65. Revenue for the quarter came in at $311 million versus the consensus estimate of $337.1 million.\nUpstart Holdings, Inc. 17.9% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.62, $0.37 better than the analyst estimate of $0.25. Revenue for the quarter came in at $194 million versus the consensus estimate of $157.76 million. Upstart Holdings sees Q3 2021 revenue of $205-215 million, versus the consensus of $161.6 million.\nON24, Inc. 14.9% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.04, $0.04 better than the analyst estimate of $0.00. Revenue for the quarter came in at $52.1 million versus the consensus estimate of $51.03 million. ON24, Inc. sees Q3 2021 EPS of ($0.09)-($0.07), versus the consensus of ($0.05). ON24, Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $47.5-48.5 million, versus the consensus of $51.2 million. ON24, Inc. sees FY2021 EPS of ($0.13)-($0.06), versus the consensus of ($0.04). ON24, Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $201.2-204.2 million, versus the consensus of $209.2 million.\nOpen Lending Corporation 18.2% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.60, $0.43 better than the analyst estimate of $0.17. Revenue for the quarter came in at $61.1 million versus the consensus estimate of $48.98 million. Open Lending Corp. sees FY2021 revenue of $184-234 million, versus the consensus of $216 million.\nfuboTV Inc. 12.1% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of ($0.38), $0.12 better than the analyst estimate of ($0.50). Revenue for the quarter came in at $130.9 million versus the consensus estimate of $118.88 million. fuboTV Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $140-144 million, versus the consensus of $126.9 million. fuboTV Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $560-570 million, versus the consensus of $531.7 million.\nMaravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc. 7.4% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.44, $0.13 better than the analyst estimate of $0.31. Revenue for the quarter came in at $217.8 million versus the consensus estimate of $192.29 million. Maravai LifeSciences sees FY2021 revenue of $745-770 million, versus the consensus of $709.65 million.\nThredUp Inc. 7.3% HIGHER; Another record-setting quarter with 27% year-over-year revenue growth\nGates Industrial Corp PLC 6.2% LOWER; announced today that certain selling stockholders affiliated with The Blackstone Group Inc. have commenced a secondary offering of 25,000,000 of Gates' ordinary shares. In connection with the offering, the selling stockholders intend to grant to the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 3,750,000 additional ordinary shares.\nThe Beauty Health Corp. 5.3% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of ($1.52), versus ($0.30) reported last year. Revenue for the quarter came in at $66.5 million, versus $14.1 million reported last year.\nMcAfee Corp. 3.8% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.21, $0.03 better than the analyst estimate of $0.18. Revenue for the quarter came in at $467 million versus the consensus estimate of $433.99 million. McAfee Corp. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $461-467 million, versus the consensus of $442.8 million. McAfee Corp. sees FY2021 revenue of $1.84-1.85 billion, versus the consensus of $1.79 billion.\nOlo Inc. 3.7% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.03, $0.02 better than the analyst estimate of $0.01. Revenue for the quarter came in at $35.9 million versus the consensus estimate of $34.03 million. Olo Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $36-36.5 million, versus the consensus of $34.65 million. Olo Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $144.7-145.7 million, versus the consensus of $140.78 million.\nLufax 1.9% HIGHER; Morgan Stanley upgraded from Equalweight to Overweight with a price target of $13.00 (from $14.80).\nCoinbase Global, Inc. 0.7% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $6.42, $4.18 better than the analyst estimate of $2.24. Revenue for the quarter came in at $2.23 billion versus the consensus estimate of $1.77 billion.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FUBO":0.9,"ONTF":0.9,"COIN":0.9,"WW":0.9,"MCFE":0.9,"GTES":0.9,"LPRO":0.9,"SKIN":0.9,"UPST":0.9,"TDUP":0.9,"NDX":0.9,"OLO":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"LU":0.9,"MRVI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2277,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":892831488,"gmtCreate":1628647236644,"gmtModify":1676529807836,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4088936884410440","idStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/892831488","repostId":"1195651017","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1195651017","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1628638405,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1195651017?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-11 07:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Toplines After Hours US Market on Tuesday","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1195651017","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"U.S. stock index futures were flat during overnight trading on Tuesday, after the Dow and S&P 500 cl","content":"<p>U.S. stock index futures were flat during overnight trading on Tuesday, after the Dow and S&amp;P 500 closed at&nbsp;record highs&nbsp;following the Senate passing the$1 trillion infrastructure bill.</p>\n<p>Futures contracts tied to the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/.DJI\">DJIA</a> were slightly higher. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/.SPX\">S&amp;P 500</a> futures and Nasdaq 100 futures were flat.</p>\n<p>At 7:30&nbsp;p.m. ET, Dow e-minis were down 14 points, or 0.04%, S&amp;P 500 e-minis were down 2.50 points, or 0.06%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 8.25 points, or 0.05%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb78d3b983aa4d779cf3b1bdc234bd42\" tg-width=\"1125\" tg-height=\"413\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>Stocks making the biggest moves after hours:</b></p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WW\">Weight Watchers International Inc</a>&nbsp;23.2% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.12, which may not compare to the analyst estimate of $0.65. Revenue for the quarter came in at $311 million versus the consensus estimate of $337.1 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UPST\">Upstart Holdings, Inc.</a> 17.9% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.62, $0.37 better than the analyst estimate of $0.25. Revenue for the quarter came in at $194 million versus the consensus estimate of $157.76 million. Upstart Holdings sees Q3 2021 revenue of $205-215 million, versus the consensus of $161.6 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ONTF\">ON24, Inc.</a> 14.9% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.04, $0.04 better than the analyst estimate of $0.00. Revenue for the quarter came in at $52.1 million versus the consensus estimate of $51.03 million. ON24, Inc. sees Q3 2021 EPS of ($0.09)-($0.07), versus the consensus of ($0.05). ON24, Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $47.5-48.5 million, versus the consensus of $51.2 million. ON24, Inc. sees FY2021 EPS of ($0.13)-($0.06), versus the consensus of ($0.04). ON24, Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $201.2-204.2 million, versus the consensus of $209.2 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LPRO\">Open Lending Corporation</a> 18.2% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.60, $0.43 better than the analyst estimate of $0.17. Revenue for the quarter came in at $61.1 million versus the consensus estimate of $48.98 million. Open Lending Corp. sees FY2021 revenue of $184-234 million, versus the consensus of $216 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FUBO\">fuboTV Inc.</a> 12.1% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of ($0.38), $0.12 better than the analyst estimate of ($0.50). Revenue for the quarter came in at $130.9 million versus the consensus estimate of $118.88 million. fuboTV Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $140-144 million, versus the consensus of $126.9 million. fuboTV Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $560-570 million, versus the consensus of $531.7 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRVI\">Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc.</a> 7.4% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.44, $0.13 better than the analyst estimate of $0.31. Revenue for the quarter came in at $217.8 million versus the consensus estimate of $192.29 million. Maravai LifeSciences sees FY2021 revenue of $745-770 million, versus the consensus of $709.65 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TDUP\">ThredUp Inc.</a> 7.3% HIGHER; Another record-setting quarter with 27% year-over-year revenue growth</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GTES\">Gates Industrial Corp PLC</a> 6.2% LOWER; announced today that certain selling stockholders affiliated with The Blackstone Group Inc. have commenced a secondary offering of 25,000,000 of Gates' ordinary shares. In connection with the offering, the selling stockholders intend to grant to the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 3,750,000 additional ordinary shares.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SKIN\">The Beauty Health Corp.</a> 5.3% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of ($1.52), versus ($0.30) reported last year. Revenue for the quarter came in at $66.5 million, versus $14.1 million reported last year.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCFE\">McAfee Corp.</a> 3.8% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.21, $0.03 better than the analyst estimate of $0.18. Revenue for the quarter came in at $467 million versus the consensus estimate of $433.99 million. McAfee Corp. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $461-467 million, versus the consensus of $442.8 million. McAfee Corp. sees FY2021 revenue of $1.84-1.85 billion, versus the consensus of $1.79 billion.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/OLO\">Olo Inc.</a> 3.7% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.03, $0.02 better than the analyst estimate of $0.01. Revenue for the quarter came in at $35.9 million versus the consensus estimate of $34.03 million. Olo Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $36-36.5 million, versus the consensus of $34.65 million. Olo Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $144.7-145.7 million, versus the consensus of $140.78 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LU\">Lufax</a> 1.9% HIGHER;&nbsp;Morgan Stanley&nbsp;upgraded from Equalweight to Overweight with a price target of $13.00 (from $14.80).</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COIN\">Coinbase Global, Inc.</a> 0.7% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $6.42, $4.18 better than the analyst estimate of $2.24. Revenue for the quarter came in at $2.23 billion versus the consensus estimate of $1.77 billion.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Toplines After Hours US Market on Tuesday</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nToplines After Hours US Market on Tuesday\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-11 07:33</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>U.S. stock index futures were flat during overnight trading on Tuesday, after the Dow and S&amp;P 500 closed at&nbsp;record highs&nbsp;following the Senate passing the$1 trillion infrastructure bill.</p>\n<p>Futures contracts tied to the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/.DJI\">DJIA</a> were slightly higher. <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/.SPX\">S&amp;P 500</a> futures and Nasdaq 100 futures were flat.</p>\n<p>At 7:30&nbsp;p.m. ET, Dow e-minis were down 14 points, or 0.04%, S&amp;P 500 e-minis were down 2.50 points, or 0.06%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 8.25 points, or 0.05%.<img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/bb78d3b983aa4d779cf3b1bdc234bd42\" tg-width=\"1125\" tg-height=\"413\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p>\n<p><b>Stocks making the biggest moves after hours:</b></p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/WW\">Weight Watchers International Inc</a>&nbsp;23.2% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.12, which may not compare to the analyst estimate of $0.65. Revenue for the quarter came in at $311 million versus the consensus estimate of $337.1 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/UPST\">Upstart Holdings, Inc.</a> 17.9% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.62, $0.37 better than the analyst estimate of $0.25. Revenue for the quarter came in at $194 million versus the consensus estimate of $157.76 million. Upstart Holdings sees Q3 2021 revenue of $205-215 million, versus the consensus of $161.6 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ONTF\">ON24, Inc.</a> 14.9% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.04, $0.04 better than the analyst estimate of $0.00. Revenue for the quarter came in at $52.1 million versus the consensus estimate of $51.03 million. ON24, Inc. sees Q3 2021 EPS of ($0.09)-($0.07), versus the consensus of ($0.05). ON24, Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $47.5-48.5 million, versus the consensus of $51.2 million. ON24, Inc. sees FY2021 EPS of ($0.13)-($0.06), versus the consensus of ($0.04). ON24, Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $201.2-204.2 million, versus the consensus of $209.2 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LPRO\">Open Lending Corporation</a> 18.2% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.60, $0.43 better than the analyst estimate of $0.17. Revenue for the quarter came in at $61.1 million versus the consensus estimate of $48.98 million. Open Lending Corp. sees FY2021 revenue of $184-234 million, versus the consensus of $216 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/FUBO\">fuboTV Inc.</a> 12.1% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of ($0.38), $0.12 better than the analyst estimate of ($0.50). Revenue for the quarter came in at $130.9 million versus the consensus estimate of $118.88 million. fuboTV Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $140-144 million, versus the consensus of $126.9 million. fuboTV Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $560-570 million, versus the consensus of $531.7 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MRVI\">Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc.</a> 7.4% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.44, $0.13 better than the analyst estimate of $0.31. Revenue for the quarter came in at $217.8 million versus the consensus estimate of $192.29 million. Maravai LifeSciences sees FY2021 revenue of $745-770 million, versus the consensus of $709.65 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TDUP\">ThredUp Inc.</a> 7.3% HIGHER; Another record-setting quarter with 27% year-over-year revenue growth</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GTES\">Gates Industrial Corp PLC</a> 6.2% LOWER; announced today that certain selling stockholders affiliated with The Blackstone Group Inc. have commenced a secondary offering of 25,000,000 of Gates' ordinary shares. In connection with the offering, the selling stockholders intend to grant to the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 3,750,000 additional ordinary shares.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SKIN\">The Beauty Health Corp.</a> 5.3% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of ($1.52), versus ($0.30) reported last year. Revenue for the quarter came in at $66.5 million, versus $14.1 million reported last year.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCFE\">McAfee Corp.</a> 3.8% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.21, $0.03 better than the analyst estimate of $0.18. Revenue for the quarter came in at $467 million versus the consensus estimate of $433.99 million. McAfee Corp. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $461-467 million, versus the consensus of $442.8 million. McAfee Corp. sees FY2021 revenue of $1.84-1.85 billion, versus the consensus of $1.79 billion.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/OLO\">Olo Inc.</a> 3.7% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.03, $0.02 better than the analyst estimate of $0.01. Revenue for the quarter came in at $35.9 million versus the consensus estimate of $34.03 million. Olo Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $36-36.5 million, versus the consensus of $34.65 million. Olo Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $144.7-145.7 million, versus the consensus of $140.78 million.</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/LU\">Lufax</a> 1.9% HIGHER;&nbsp;Morgan Stanley&nbsp;upgraded from Equalweight to Overweight with a price target of $13.00 (from $14.80).</p>\n<p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/COIN\">Coinbase Global, Inc.</a> 0.7% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $6.42, $4.18 better than the analyst estimate of $2.24. Revenue for the quarter came in at $2.23 billion versus the consensus estimate of $1.77 billion.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"ONTF":"ON24, Inc.","SKIN":"The Beauty Health Corp.",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".DJI":"道琼斯","GTES":"Gates Industrial Corp PLC","UPST":"Upstart Holdings, Inc.","TDUP":"ThredUp Inc.","NDX":"纳斯达克100指数",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","WW":"WW International, Inc.","COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc.","MCFE":"McAfee Corp.","FUBO":"fuboTV Inc.","OLO":"PowerShares DB Crude Oil Long ET","LPRO":"Open Lending Corporation","MRVI":"Maravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc.","LU":"陆金所"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1195651017","content_text":"U.S. stock index futures were flat during overnight trading on Tuesday, after the Dow and S&P 500 closed at record highs following the Senate passing the$1 trillion infrastructure bill.\nFutures contracts tied to the DJIA were slightly higher. S&P 500 futures and Nasdaq 100 futures were flat.\nAt 7:30 p.m. ET, Dow e-minis were down 14 points, or 0.04%, S&P 500 e-minis were down 2.50 points, or 0.06%, and Nasdaq 100 e-minis were down 8.25 points, or 0.05%.\nStocks making the biggest moves after hours:\nWeight Watchers International Inc 23.2% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.12, which may not compare to the analyst estimate of $0.65. Revenue for the quarter came in at $311 million versus the consensus estimate of $337.1 million.\nUpstart Holdings, Inc. 17.9% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.62, $0.37 better than the analyst estimate of $0.25. Revenue for the quarter came in at $194 million versus the consensus estimate of $157.76 million. Upstart Holdings sees Q3 2021 revenue of $205-215 million, versus the consensus of $161.6 million.\nON24, Inc. 14.9% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.04, $0.04 better than the analyst estimate of $0.00. Revenue for the quarter came in at $52.1 million versus the consensus estimate of $51.03 million. ON24, Inc. sees Q3 2021 EPS of ($0.09)-($0.07), versus the consensus of ($0.05). ON24, Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $47.5-48.5 million, versus the consensus of $51.2 million. ON24, Inc. sees FY2021 EPS of ($0.13)-($0.06), versus the consensus of ($0.04). ON24, Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $201.2-204.2 million, versus the consensus of $209.2 million.\nOpen Lending Corporation 18.2% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.60, $0.43 better than the analyst estimate of $0.17. Revenue for the quarter came in at $61.1 million versus the consensus estimate of $48.98 million. Open Lending Corp. sees FY2021 revenue of $184-234 million, versus the consensus of $216 million.\nfuboTV Inc. 12.1% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of ($0.38), $0.12 better than the analyst estimate of ($0.50). Revenue for the quarter came in at $130.9 million versus the consensus estimate of $118.88 million. fuboTV Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $140-144 million, versus the consensus of $126.9 million. fuboTV Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $560-570 million, versus the consensus of $531.7 million.\nMaravai LifeSciences Holdings, Inc. 7.4% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.44, $0.13 better than the analyst estimate of $0.31. Revenue for the quarter came in at $217.8 million versus the consensus estimate of $192.29 million. Maravai LifeSciences sees FY2021 revenue of $745-770 million, versus the consensus of $709.65 million.\nThredUp Inc. 7.3% HIGHER; Another record-setting quarter with 27% year-over-year revenue growth\nGates Industrial Corp PLC 6.2% LOWER; announced today that certain selling stockholders affiliated with The Blackstone Group Inc. have commenced a secondary offering of 25,000,000 of Gates' ordinary shares. In connection with the offering, the selling stockholders intend to grant to the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to 3,750,000 additional ordinary shares.\nThe Beauty Health Corp. 5.3% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of ($1.52), versus ($0.30) reported last year. Revenue for the quarter came in at $66.5 million, versus $14.1 million reported last year.\nMcAfee Corp. 3.8% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.21, $0.03 better than the analyst estimate of $0.18. Revenue for the quarter came in at $467 million versus the consensus estimate of $433.99 million. McAfee Corp. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $461-467 million, versus the consensus of $442.8 million. McAfee Corp. sees FY2021 revenue of $1.84-1.85 billion, versus the consensus of $1.79 billion.\nOlo Inc. 3.7% LOWER; reported Q2 EPS of $0.03, $0.02 better than the analyst estimate of $0.01. Revenue for the quarter came in at $35.9 million versus the consensus estimate of $34.03 million. Olo Inc. sees Q3 2021 revenue of $36-36.5 million, versus the consensus of $34.65 million. Olo Inc. sees FY2021 revenue of $144.7-145.7 million, versus the consensus of $140.78 million.\nLufax 1.9% HIGHER; Morgan Stanley upgraded from Equalweight to Overweight with a price target of $13.00 (from $14.80).\nCoinbase Global, Inc. 0.7% HIGHER; reported Q2 EPS of $6.42, $4.18 better than the analyst estimate of $2.24. Revenue for the quarter came in at $2.23 billion versus the consensus estimate of $1.77 billion.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"FUBO":0.9,"ONTF":0.9,"COIN":0.9,"WW":0.9,"MCFE":0.9,"GTES":0.9,"LPRO":0.9,"SKIN":0.9,"UPST":0.9,"TDUP":0.9,"NDX":0.9,"OLO":0.9,".SPX":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".IXIC":0.9,"LU":0.9,"MRVI":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2330,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":896936796,"gmtCreate":1628550881615,"gmtModify":1703507831953,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4088936884410440","idStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/896936796","repostId":"1142685473","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2743,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":898794537,"gmtCreate":1628520577229,"gmtModify":1703507538490,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4088936884410440","idStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yea","listText":"Yea","text":"Yea","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/898794537","repostId":"2158442754","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1956,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":898995793,"gmtCreate":1628467111312,"gmtModify":1703506397890,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4088936884410440","idStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/898995793","repostId":"1160977534","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2479,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":898998531,"gmtCreate":1628466955223,"gmtModify":1703506393683,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4088936884410440","idStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/898998531","repostId":"1136322726","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2596,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":891658222,"gmtCreate":1628388177166,"gmtModify":1703505642036,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4088936884410440","idStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/891658222","repostId":"1190347839","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":488,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":893495086,"gmtCreate":1628294289145,"gmtModify":1703504561966,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4088936884410440","idStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/893495086","repostId":"1110804460","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":844,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":893496892,"gmtCreate":1628294221616,"gmtModify":1703504559669,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4088936884410440","idStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/893496892","repostId":"1155656235","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1155656235","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1628227304,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1155656235?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-06 13:21","market":"us","language":"en","title":"20 cloud stocks expected to increase sales the most over the next two years","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1155656235","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Cloud ETFs are close to record highs, propelled by a rally in the sector\nAnalysts see stellar sales ","content":"<p>Cloud ETFs are close to record highs, propelled by a rally in the sector</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/78101d8010e186fe4df59b2ef82b5de6\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"394\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Analysts see stellar sales growth ahead for companies that provide cloud services. (Getty Images/iStockphoto)</span></p>\n<p>U.S. investors remain bullish, despite rumblings out of China and the spike in delta variant infections.</p>\n<p>Cloud companies — those at the forefront of the shift in computing power to distributed models over the internet — are expected to grow at a rapid clip over the next several years, and four of the five largest exchange traded funds covering the space are close to hitting record highs.</p>\n<p>Below is a screen of stocks held by those ETFs, showing which are expected to increase their sales the most through 2023. In an industry with many players at relatively early stages, increases in sales, rather than in earnings, might be the best driver of stock prices.</p>\n<p>To begin the screen, we looked at the five largest cloud ETFs:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/36209ce827d95e822cad5128be8b146a\" tg-width=\"933\" tg-height=\"664\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: FactSet</span></p>\n<p>ETFs might be your best way to take a broad approach for a long-term play on the cloud revolution. If you are interested in any ETF, you should review the fund manager’s website.</p>\n<p>Here’s a comparison of total returns through Aug. 4, along with those for the SPDR S&amp;P 500 ETF&nbsp;and the Invesco QQQ Trust&nbsp;(which tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index) for comparison:</p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/242f135b3c7cca3cbaae3ee574023c1f\" tg-width=\"942\" tg-height=\"577\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: FactSet</span></p>\n<p>The ETFs’ approaches differ. For example, the ARK Next Generation Internet ETF&nbsp;is the only one that is actively managed. The others track an index. It is also the only one that holds shares of Tesla Inc.,which makes up 10.65% of the portfolio, according to information posted by ARK Invest on Aug. 5. Tesla is an electric-vehicle manufacturer, but it can also be considered a cloud company because it distributes software updates over the internet continually, and offers other cloud-based services.</p>\n<p>Another holding unique to ARKW among the five cloud ETFs is Walt Disney Co.,which is certainly an important cloud player through its Disney+ streaming service, even if the company doesn’t say directly how much of its sales are derived from that rapidly growing segment.</p>\n<p>As part of its description of ARKW, FactSet says the following:</p>\n<p><i>“Broadly speaking, the ARKW’s managers appear focused on big buzzwords such as Internet of Things, cloud computing, digital currencies and wearable technology. While the fund’s focus may be appealing for investors with conviction in these new technologies, portfolio implementation is a more difficult task: Most of the companies developing these advancements are huge corporations for which nascent technologies are only a small fraction of total revenues. As such, it’s very difficult to get pure-play access to ARKW’s targeted technologies — so be sure to confirm that the fund’s holdings — not just its thesis — align with your view of the space.”</i></p>\n<p><b>Cloud-stock screen</b></p>\n<p>Together, the five cloud ETFs listed above hold 147 stocks. To project sales growth through 2023, we used calendar 2020 sales estimates as a baseline and then looked at consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet for the subsequent three years, if available. (The 2020 numbers are estimates, because many companies’ fiscal years don’t match the calendar.)</p>\n<p>To make sure we had a solid set of estimates, we confined the group to the 126 companies covered by at least five analysts polled by FactSet, for which consensus sales estimates for calendar 2020 through calendar 2023 are available.</p>\n<p>Here are the 20 companies projected to have the highest compound annual growth rates (CAGR) for sales through calendar 2023:</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/517a23591cde159fb889ab80abc4bcc6\" tg-width=\"934\" tg-height=\"765\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/6af2cf5b5f9f0ce50f8f023ac7babc7f\" tg-width=\"935\" tg-height=\"717\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/b88ebe72e09cb9ce3294269f0a4ae431\" tg-width=\"935\" tg-height=\"403\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: FactSet</span></p>\n<p>There are actually 21 stocks listed, including Zillow Group Inc.’s Class A&nbsp;and Class C&nbsp;shares.</p>\n<p>It is interesting to see that the list is dominated by stocks held by ARKW. The fund has a broad definition of cloud companies and is focused also on sales growth.</p>\n<p>Here are current forward price-to-sales ratios based on consensus estimates for the next 12 months, as well as ratios of current market cap to projected 2023 sales and summaries of analysts’ opinions about the stocks.</p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/19b9c4bf1d8b1abcfa76b7d008a47ad7\" tg-width=\"938\" tg-height=\"805\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2ff191189c5d7d2f31698843734ca3cc\" tg-width=\"933\" tg-height=\"773\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0e9543489c4d52d3f1a69dfdcf170115\" tg-width=\"930\" tg-height=\"242\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"><span>Source: FactSet</span></p>\n<p>In comparison, the forward price-to-sales ratio for SPY is 2.8, with a price/2023 estimated sales ratio of 2.6. For QQQ, the current P/S is 4.7, declining to 4.3 for 2023.</p>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>20 cloud stocks expected to increase sales the most over the next two years</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n20 cloud stocks expected to increase sales the most over the next two years\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-06 13:21 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/20-cloud-stocks-expected-to-increase-sales-the-most-over-the-next-two-years-11628186683?mod=home-page><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Cloud ETFs are close to record highs, propelled by a rally in the sector\nAnalysts see stellar sales growth ahead for companies that provide cloud services. (Getty Images/iStockphoto)\nU.S. investors ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/20-cloud-stocks-expected-to-increase-sales-the-most-over-the-next-two-years-11628186683?mod=home-page\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SE":"Sea Ltd","PDD":"拼多多","SHOP":"Shopify Inc","CRWD":"CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc.","ADYEY":"Adyen N.V.","COIN":"Coinbase Global, Inc.","PINS":"Pinterest, Inc.","VCYT":"Veracyte Inc","DKNG":"DraftKings Inc.","TDOC":"Teladoc Health Inc.","Z":"Zillow","LC":"LendingClub","SKLZ":"Skillz Inc","ROKU":"Roku Inc","MELI":"MercadoLibre","SNAP":"Snap Inc","OKTA":"Okta Inc.","ZG":"Zillow Class A","KC":"金山云","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/20-cloud-stocks-expected-to-increase-sales-the-most-over-the-next-two-years-11628186683?mod=home-page","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1155656235","content_text":"Cloud ETFs are close to record highs, propelled by a rally in the sector\nAnalysts see stellar sales growth ahead for companies that provide cloud services. (Getty Images/iStockphoto)\nU.S. investors remain bullish, despite rumblings out of China and the spike in delta variant infections.\nCloud companies — those at the forefront of the shift in computing power to distributed models over the internet — are expected to grow at a rapid clip over the next several years, and four of the five largest exchange traded funds covering the space are close to hitting record highs.\nBelow is a screen of stocks held by those ETFs, showing which are expected to increase their sales the most through 2023. In an industry with many players at relatively early stages, increases in sales, rather than in earnings, might be the best driver of stock prices.\nTo begin the screen, we looked at the five largest cloud ETFs:\nSource: FactSet\nETFs might be your best way to take a broad approach for a long-term play on the cloud revolution. If you are interested in any ETF, you should review the fund manager’s website.\nHere’s a comparison of total returns through Aug. 4, along with those for the SPDR S&P 500 ETF and the Invesco QQQ Trust (which tracks the Nasdaq-100 Index) for comparison:\nSource: FactSet\nThe ETFs’ approaches differ. For example, the ARK Next Generation Internet ETF is the only one that is actively managed. The others track an index. It is also the only one that holds shares of Tesla Inc.,which makes up 10.65% of the portfolio, according to information posted by ARK Invest on Aug. 5. Tesla is an electric-vehicle manufacturer, but it can also be considered a cloud company because it distributes software updates over the internet continually, and offers other cloud-based services.\nAnother holding unique to ARKW among the five cloud ETFs is Walt Disney Co.,which is certainly an important cloud player through its Disney+ streaming service, even if the company doesn’t say directly how much of its sales are derived from that rapidly growing segment.\nAs part of its description of ARKW, FactSet says the following:\n“Broadly speaking, the ARKW’s managers appear focused on big buzzwords such as Internet of Things, cloud computing, digital currencies and wearable technology. While the fund’s focus may be appealing for investors with conviction in these new technologies, portfolio implementation is a more difficult task: Most of the companies developing these advancements are huge corporations for which nascent technologies are only a small fraction of total revenues. As such, it’s very difficult to get pure-play access to ARKW’s targeted technologies — so be sure to confirm that the fund’s holdings — not just its thesis — align with your view of the space.”\nCloud-stock screen\nTogether, the five cloud ETFs listed above hold 147 stocks. To project sales growth through 2023, we used calendar 2020 sales estimates as a baseline and then looked at consensus estimates among analysts polled by FactSet for the subsequent three years, if available. (The 2020 numbers are estimates, because many companies’ fiscal years don’t match the calendar.)\nTo make sure we had a solid set of estimates, we confined the group to the 126 companies covered by at least five analysts polled by FactSet, for which consensus sales estimates for calendar 2020 through calendar 2023 are available.\nHere are the 20 companies projected to have the highest compound annual growth rates (CAGR) for sales through calendar 2023:\n\nSource: FactSet\nThere are actually 21 stocks listed, including Zillow Group Inc.’s Class A and Class C shares.\nIt is interesting to see that the list is dominated by stocks held by ARKW. The fund has a broad definition of cloud companies and is focused also on sales growth.\nHere are current forward price-to-sales ratios based on consensus estimates for the next 12 months, as well as ratios of current market cap to projected 2023 sales and summaries of analysts’ opinions about the stocks.\n\nSource: FactSet\nIn comparison, the forward price-to-sales ratio for SPY is 2.8, with a price/2023 estimated sales ratio of 2.6. For QQQ, the current P/S is 4.7, declining to 4.3 for 2023.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":0.9,"OKTA":0.9,"ROKU":0.9,"DKNG":0.9,"MELI":0.9,"TDOC":0.9,"VCYT":0.9,"Z":0.9,"COIN":0.9,"CRWD":0.9,"SKLZ":0.9,"PINS":0.9,"PDD":0.9,"SNAP":0.9,"ZG":0.9,"LC":0.9,"SHOP":0.9,"SE":0.9,"SQ":0.9,"ADYEY":0.9,"KC":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":453,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":893635206,"gmtCreate":1628258927005,"gmtModify":1703504144900,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4088936884410440","idStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Let’s c","listText":"Let’s c","text":"Let’s c","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/893635206","repostId":"1187374387","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":669,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":893343035,"gmtCreate":1628240928927,"gmtModify":1703503792847,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4088936884410440","idStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh no","listText":"Oh no","text":"Oh no","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/893343035","repostId":"1100333342","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1100333342","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1628236792,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1100333342?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-06 15:59","market":"sh","language":"en","title":"China shares end lower as virus, regulatory woes weigh","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1100333342","media":"Reuters","summary":"Shanghai stocks -0.24%, blue-chip CSI300 -0.55%\nIndexes post biggest weekly gains since June\nHealthc","content":"<ul>\n <li>Shanghai stocks -0.24%, blue-chip CSI300 -0.55%</li>\n <li>Indexes post biggest weekly gains since June</li>\n <li>Healthcare, consumer staples drag on broader gauges</li>\n <li>China reports 124 new coronavirus cases</li>\n</ul>\n<p>SHANGHAI, Aug 6 (Reuters) - China shares closed lower on Friday, on worries over a continuing surge of new cases of COVID-19 and tightening government regulations, although they recorded their biggest weekly gain in six.</p>\n<p>The Shanghai Composite index ended down 0.24% at 3,458.23. The blue-chip CSI300 index was down 0.55%.</p>\n<p>But both indexes had their biggest weekly gains since late June, with the CSI300 rising 2.3% and the Shanghai Composite adding 1.8% after sharp drops last week.</p>\n<p>Declines in healthcare shares dragged on the broader market, with an index tracking the sector falling 3.75%. The consumer staples sector fell 0.89% and the IT sector slipped 0.71%.</p>\n<p>The falls came as China on Friday reported its highest daily count for new coronavirus infections in its current outbreak. The rise in cases has fuelled concern about the outlook for China’s uneven economic recovery.</p>\n<p>Education firms also fell, with an index tracking the sector in mainland and Hong Kong markets sliding 0.73%. The index, walloped by last month’s banning of curriculum-based for-profit tutoring in China, has fallen for 11 straight weeks.</p>\n<p>Duolingo Inco said it was aware that its popular language learning app was no longer available for download on some Chinese app stores, following the tutoring crackdown.</p>\n<p>The smaller Shenzhen index ended down 0.2% and the start-up board ChiNext Composite index was weaker by 1.178%.</p>\n<p>Around the region, MSCI’s Asia ex-Japan stock index was weaker by 0.14%, while Japan’s Nikkei index closed up 0.33%.</p>\n<p>At 0703 GMT, the yuan was quoted at 6.465 per U.S. dollar, 0.06% weaker than the previous close of 6.461. (Reporting by Shanghai Newsroom; editing by Uttaresh.V)</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>China shares end lower as virus, regulatory woes weigh</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nChina shares end lower as virus, regulatory woes weigh\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-06 15:59</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<ul>\n <li>Shanghai stocks -0.24%, blue-chip CSI300 -0.55%</li>\n <li>Indexes post biggest weekly gains since June</li>\n <li>Healthcare, consumer staples drag on broader gauges</li>\n <li>China reports 124 new coronavirus cases</li>\n</ul>\n<p>SHANGHAI, Aug 6 (Reuters) - China shares closed lower on Friday, on worries over a continuing surge of new cases of COVID-19 and tightening government regulations, although they recorded their biggest weekly gain in six.</p>\n<p>The Shanghai Composite index ended down 0.24% at 3,458.23. The blue-chip CSI300 index was down 0.55%.</p>\n<p>But both indexes had their biggest weekly gains since late June, with the CSI300 rising 2.3% and the Shanghai Composite adding 1.8% after sharp drops last week.</p>\n<p>Declines in healthcare shares dragged on the broader market, with an index tracking the sector falling 3.75%. The consumer staples sector fell 0.89% and the IT sector slipped 0.71%.</p>\n<p>The falls came as China on Friday reported its highest daily count for new coronavirus infections in its current outbreak. The rise in cases has fuelled concern about the outlook for China’s uneven economic recovery.</p>\n<p>Education firms also fell, with an index tracking the sector in mainland and Hong Kong markets sliding 0.73%. The index, walloped by last month’s banning of curriculum-based for-profit tutoring in China, has fallen for 11 straight weeks.</p>\n<p>Duolingo Inco said it was aware that its popular language learning app was no longer available for download on some Chinese app stores, following the tutoring crackdown.</p>\n<p>The smaller Shenzhen index ended down 0.2% and the start-up board ChiNext Composite index was weaker by 1.178%.</p>\n<p>Around the region, MSCI’s Asia ex-Japan stock index was weaker by 0.14%, while Japan’s Nikkei index closed up 0.33%.</p>\n<p>At 0703 GMT, the yuan was quoted at 6.465 per U.S. dollar, 0.06% weaker than the previous close of 6.461. (Reporting by Shanghai Newsroom; editing by Uttaresh.V)</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"399001":"深证成指","399006":"创业板指","000001.SH":"上证指数"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1100333342","content_text":"Shanghai stocks -0.24%, blue-chip CSI300 -0.55%\nIndexes post biggest weekly gains since June\nHealthcare, consumer staples drag on broader gauges\nChina reports 124 new coronavirus cases\n\nSHANGHAI, Aug 6 (Reuters) - China shares closed lower on Friday, on worries over a continuing surge of new cases of COVID-19 and tightening government regulations, although they recorded their biggest weekly gain in six.\nThe Shanghai Composite index ended down 0.24% at 3,458.23. The blue-chip CSI300 index was down 0.55%.\nBut both indexes had their biggest weekly gains since late June, with the CSI300 rising 2.3% and the Shanghai Composite adding 1.8% after sharp drops last week.\nDeclines in healthcare shares dragged on the broader market, with an index tracking the sector falling 3.75%. The consumer staples sector fell 0.89% and the IT sector slipped 0.71%.\nThe falls came as China on Friday reported its highest daily count for new coronavirus infections in its current outbreak. The rise in cases has fuelled concern about the outlook for China’s uneven economic recovery.\nEducation firms also fell, with an index tracking the sector in mainland and Hong Kong markets sliding 0.73%. The index, walloped by last month’s banning of curriculum-based for-profit tutoring in China, has fallen for 11 straight weeks.\nDuolingo Inco said it was aware that its popular language learning app was no longer available for download on some Chinese app stores, following the tutoring crackdown.\nThe smaller Shenzhen index ended down 0.2% and the start-up board ChiNext Composite index was weaker by 1.178%.\nAround the region, MSCI’s Asia ex-Japan stock index was weaker by 0.14%, while Japan’s Nikkei index closed up 0.33%.\nAt 0703 GMT, the yuan was quoted at 6.465 per U.S. dollar, 0.06% weaker than the previous close of 6.461. (Reporting by Shanghai Newsroom; editing by Uttaresh.V)","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"399001":0.9,"399006":0.9,"000001.SH":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":468,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":893340723,"gmtCreate":1628240855562,"gmtModify":1703503791192,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4088936884410440","idStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Yes","listText":"Yes","text":"Yes","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/893340723","repostId":"2157432677","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":559,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":893354312,"gmtCreate":1628240746936,"gmtModify":1703503786879,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4088936884410440","idStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/893354312","repostId":"2157432677","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":520,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":899949671,"gmtCreate":1628154576993,"gmtModify":1703502213773,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4088936884410440","idStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/899949671","repostId":"2157433352","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2157433352","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1628153095,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2157433352?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-05 16:44","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Hong Kong stocks end lower on tech regulatory worries","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2157433352","media":"Reuters","summary":"Aug 5 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended lower in a volatile session on Thursday, as uncertainty aro","content":"<p>Aug 5 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended lower in a volatile session on Thursday, as uncertainty around regulatory tightening in the tech sector sapped risk appetite.</p>\n<p>At the close of trade, the Hang Seng index was down 221.86 points or 0.84% at 26,204.69. The Hang Seng China Enterprises index fell 1.3% to 9,296.43.</p>\n<p>The sub-index of the Hang Seng tracking technology shares&nbsp;dropped 2.1%, while the IT sector fell 2.31%.</p>\n<p>The Chinese Communist top decision-making body at its latest meeting mentioned terms like \"anti-monopoly\" and \"curbing disorderly expansion by capital\", portending a regulatory storm that would crush tech stocks in the coming months, said Larry Hu, chief China economist at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MQG.AU\">Macquarie</a> in Hong Kong.</p>\n<p>The three biggest H-share percentage decliners were Kuaishou Technology , down 15.3%, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ALBBY\">Alibaba Health Information Technology Ltd</a> , which fell 6.17% and Country Garden Services Holdings Co Ltd, which shed 4.75%.</p>\n<p>Around the region, MSCI's Asia ex-Japan stock index&nbsp;was weaker by 0.29%, while Japan's Nikkei index&nbsp;closed up 0.52%.</p>\n<p>This week, the MSCI Asian regional benchmark has recovered most of the ground lost a week earlier, when a series of Chinese regulatory crackdowns on sectors from property to education squeezed Chinese stocks and overshadowed the region as a whole.</p>\n<p>(Reporting by the Shanghai Newsroom; Editing by Ramakrishnan M.)</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hong Kong stocks end lower on tech regulatory worries</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHong Kong stocks end lower on tech regulatory worries\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-05 16:44</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Aug 5 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended lower in a volatile session on Thursday, as uncertainty around regulatory tightening in the tech sector sapped risk appetite.</p>\n<p>At the close of trade, the Hang Seng index was down 221.86 points or 0.84% at 26,204.69. The Hang Seng China Enterprises index fell 1.3% to 9,296.43.</p>\n<p>The sub-index of the Hang Seng tracking technology shares&nbsp;dropped 2.1%, while the IT sector fell 2.31%.</p>\n<p>The Chinese Communist top decision-making body at its latest meeting mentioned terms like \"anti-monopoly\" and \"curbing disorderly expansion by capital\", portending a regulatory storm that would crush tech stocks in the coming months, said Larry Hu, chief China economist at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MQG.AU\">Macquarie</a> in Hong Kong.</p>\n<p>The three biggest H-share percentage decliners were Kuaishou Technology , down 15.3%, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ALBBY\">Alibaba Health Information Technology Ltd</a> , which fell 6.17% and Country Garden Services Holdings Co Ltd, which shed 4.75%.</p>\n<p>Around the region, MSCI's Asia ex-Japan stock index&nbsp;was weaker by 0.29%, while Japan's Nikkei index&nbsp;closed up 0.52%.</p>\n<p>This week, the MSCI Asian regional benchmark has recovered most of the ground lost a week earlier, when a series of Chinese regulatory crackdowns on sectors from property to education squeezed Chinese stocks and overshadowed the region as a whole.</p>\n<p>(Reporting by the Shanghai Newsroom; Editing by Ramakrishnan M.)</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09988":"阿里巴巴-W","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","HSI":"恒生指数"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2157433352","content_text":"Aug 5 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended lower in a volatile session on Thursday, as uncertainty around regulatory tightening in the tech sector sapped risk appetite.\nAt the close of trade, the Hang Seng index was down 221.86 points or 0.84% at 26,204.69. The Hang Seng China Enterprises index fell 1.3% to 9,296.43.\nThe sub-index of the Hang Seng tracking technology shares dropped 2.1%, while the IT sector fell 2.31%.\nThe Chinese Communist top decision-making body at its latest meeting mentioned terms like \"anti-monopoly\" and \"curbing disorderly expansion by capital\", portending a regulatory storm that would crush tech stocks in the coming months, said Larry Hu, chief China economist at Macquarie in Hong Kong.\nThe three biggest H-share percentage decliners were Kuaishou Technology , down 15.3%, Alibaba Health Information Technology Ltd , which fell 6.17% and Country Garden Services Holdings Co Ltd, which shed 4.75%.\nAround the region, MSCI's Asia ex-Japan stock index was weaker by 0.29%, while Japan's Nikkei index closed up 0.52%.\nThis week, the MSCI Asian regional benchmark has recovered most of the ground lost a week earlier, when a series of Chinese regulatory crackdowns on sectors from property to education squeezed Chinese stocks and overshadowed the region as a whole.\n(Reporting by the Shanghai Newsroom; Editing by Ramakrishnan M.)","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"HSI":0.9,"09988":0.9,"QNETCN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":754,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":899957722,"gmtCreate":1628154470566,"gmtModify":1703502212315,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4088936884410440","idStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/899957722","repostId":"2157433352","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2157433352","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1628153095,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2157433352?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-05 16:44","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Hong Kong stocks end lower on tech regulatory worries","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2157433352","media":"Reuters","summary":"Aug 5 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended lower in a volatile session on Thursday, as uncertainty aro","content":"<p>Aug 5 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended lower in a volatile session on Thursday, as uncertainty around regulatory tightening in the tech sector sapped risk appetite.</p>\n<p>At the close of trade, the Hang Seng index was down 221.86 points or 0.84% at 26,204.69. The Hang Seng China Enterprises index fell 1.3% to 9,296.43.</p>\n<p>The sub-index of the Hang Seng tracking technology shares&nbsp;dropped 2.1%, while the IT sector fell 2.31%.</p>\n<p>The Chinese Communist top decision-making body at its latest meeting mentioned terms like \"anti-monopoly\" and \"curbing disorderly expansion by capital\", portending a regulatory storm that would crush tech stocks in the coming months, said Larry Hu, chief China economist at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MQG.AU\">Macquarie</a> in Hong Kong.</p>\n<p>The three biggest H-share percentage decliners were Kuaishou Technology , down 15.3%, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ALBBY\">Alibaba Health Information Technology Ltd</a> , which fell 6.17% and Country Garden Services Holdings Co Ltd, which shed 4.75%.</p>\n<p>Around the region, MSCI's Asia ex-Japan stock index&nbsp;was weaker by 0.29%, while Japan's Nikkei index&nbsp;closed up 0.52%.</p>\n<p>This week, the MSCI Asian regional benchmark has recovered most of the ground lost a week earlier, when a series of Chinese regulatory crackdowns on sectors from property to education squeezed Chinese stocks and overshadowed the region as a whole.</p>\n<p>(Reporting by the Shanghai Newsroom; Editing by Ramakrishnan M.)</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hong Kong stocks end lower on tech regulatory worries</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHong Kong stocks end lower on tech regulatory worries\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-05 16:44</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Aug 5 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended lower in a volatile session on Thursday, as uncertainty around regulatory tightening in the tech sector sapped risk appetite.</p>\n<p>At the close of trade, the Hang Seng index was down 221.86 points or 0.84% at 26,204.69. The Hang Seng China Enterprises index fell 1.3% to 9,296.43.</p>\n<p>The sub-index of the Hang Seng tracking technology shares&nbsp;dropped 2.1%, while the IT sector fell 2.31%.</p>\n<p>The Chinese Communist top decision-making body at its latest meeting mentioned terms like \"anti-monopoly\" and \"curbing disorderly expansion by capital\", portending a regulatory storm that would crush tech stocks in the coming months, said Larry Hu, chief China economist at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MQG.AU\">Macquarie</a> in Hong Kong.</p>\n<p>The three biggest H-share percentage decliners were Kuaishou Technology , down 15.3%, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ALBBY\">Alibaba Health Information Technology Ltd</a> , which fell 6.17% and Country Garden Services Holdings Co Ltd, which shed 4.75%.</p>\n<p>Around the region, MSCI's Asia ex-Japan stock index&nbsp;was weaker by 0.29%, while Japan's Nikkei index&nbsp;closed up 0.52%.</p>\n<p>This week, the MSCI Asian regional benchmark has recovered most of the ground lost a week earlier, when a series of Chinese regulatory crackdowns on sectors from property to education squeezed Chinese stocks and overshadowed the region as a whole.</p>\n<p>(Reporting by the Shanghai Newsroom; Editing by Ramakrishnan M.)</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09988":"阿里巴巴-W","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","HSI":"恒生指数"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2157433352","content_text":"Aug 5 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended lower in a volatile session on Thursday, as uncertainty around regulatory tightening in the tech sector sapped risk appetite.\nAt the close of trade, the Hang Seng index was down 221.86 points or 0.84% at 26,204.69. The Hang Seng China Enterprises index fell 1.3% to 9,296.43.\nThe sub-index of the Hang Seng tracking technology shares dropped 2.1%, while the IT sector fell 2.31%.\nThe Chinese Communist top decision-making body at its latest meeting mentioned terms like \"anti-monopoly\" and \"curbing disorderly expansion by capital\", portending a regulatory storm that would crush tech stocks in the coming months, said Larry Hu, chief China economist at Macquarie in Hong Kong.\nThe three biggest H-share percentage decliners were Kuaishou Technology , down 15.3%, Alibaba Health Information Technology Ltd , which fell 6.17% and Country Garden Services Holdings Co Ltd, which shed 4.75%.\nAround the region, MSCI's Asia ex-Japan stock index was weaker by 0.29%, while Japan's Nikkei index closed up 0.52%.\nThis week, the MSCI Asian regional benchmark has recovered most of the ground lost a week earlier, when a series of Chinese regulatory crackdowns on sectors from property to education squeezed Chinese stocks and overshadowed the region as a whole.\n(Reporting by the Shanghai Newsroom; Editing by Ramakrishnan M.)","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"HSI":0.9,"09988":0.9,"QNETCN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":463,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":807638775,"gmtCreate":1628033982497,"gmtModify":1703499836750,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"4088936884410440","idStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh no","listText":"Oh no","text":"Oh no","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/807638775","repostId":"2156312793","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":489,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"hots":[{"id":898998531,"gmtCreate":1628466955223,"gmtModify":1703506393683,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088936884410440","authorIdStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":9,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/898998531","repostId":"1136322726","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2596,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":893495086,"gmtCreate":1628294289145,"gmtModify":1703504561966,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088936884410440","authorIdStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":7,"commentSize":3,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/893495086","repostId":"1110804460","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":844,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":899949671,"gmtCreate":1628154576993,"gmtModify":1703502213773,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088936884410440","authorIdStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/899949671","repostId":"2157433352","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2157433352","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1628153095,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2157433352?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-05 16:44","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Hong Kong stocks end lower on tech regulatory worries","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2157433352","media":"Reuters","summary":"Aug 5 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended lower in a volatile session on Thursday, as uncertainty aro","content":"<p>Aug 5 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended lower in a volatile session on Thursday, as uncertainty around regulatory tightening in the tech sector sapped risk appetite.</p>\n<p>At the close of trade, the Hang Seng index was down 221.86 points or 0.84% at 26,204.69. The Hang Seng China Enterprises index fell 1.3% to 9,296.43.</p>\n<p>The sub-index of the Hang Seng tracking technology shares&nbsp;dropped 2.1%, while the IT sector fell 2.31%.</p>\n<p>The Chinese Communist top decision-making body at its latest meeting mentioned terms like \"anti-monopoly\" and \"curbing disorderly expansion by capital\", portending a regulatory storm that would crush tech stocks in the coming months, said Larry Hu, chief China economist at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MQG.AU\">Macquarie</a> in Hong Kong.</p>\n<p>The three biggest H-share percentage decliners were Kuaishou Technology , down 15.3%, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ALBBY\">Alibaba Health Information Technology Ltd</a> , which fell 6.17% and Country Garden Services Holdings Co Ltd, which shed 4.75%.</p>\n<p>Around the region, MSCI's Asia ex-Japan stock index&nbsp;was weaker by 0.29%, while Japan's Nikkei index&nbsp;closed up 0.52%.</p>\n<p>This week, the MSCI Asian regional benchmark has recovered most of the ground lost a week earlier, when a series of Chinese regulatory crackdowns on sectors from property to education squeezed Chinese stocks and overshadowed the region as a whole.</p>\n<p>(Reporting by the Shanghai Newsroom; Editing by Ramakrishnan M.)</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hong Kong stocks end lower on tech regulatory worries</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHong Kong stocks end lower on tech regulatory worries\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-05 16:44</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Aug 5 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended lower in a volatile session on Thursday, as uncertainty around regulatory tightening in the tech sector sapped risk appetite.</p>\n<p>At the close of trade, the Hang Seng index was down 221.86 points or 0.84% at 26,204.69. The Hang Seng China Enterprises index fell 1.3% to 9,296.43.</p>\n<p>The sub-index of the Hang Seng tracking technology shares&nbsp;dropped 2.1%, while the IT sector fell 2.31%.</p>\n<p>The Chinese Communist top decision-making body at its latest meeting mentioned terms like \"anti-monopoly\" and \"curbing disorderly expansion by capital\", portending a regulatory storm that would crush tech stocks in the coming months, said Larry Hu, chief China economist at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MQG.AU\">Macquarie</a> in Hong Kong.</p>\n<p>The three biggest H-share percentage decliners were Kuaishou Technology , down 15.3%, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ALBBY\">Alibaba Health Information Technology Ltd</a> , which fell 6.17% and Country Garden Services Holdings Co Ltd, which shed 4.75%.</p>\n<p>Around the region, MSCI's Asia ex-Japan stock index&nbsp;was weaker by 0.29%, while Japan's Nikkei index&nbsp;closed up 0.52%.</p>\n<p>This week, the MSCI Asian regional benchmark has recovered most of the ground lost a week earlier, when a series of Chinese regulatory crackdowns on sectors from property to education squeezed Chinese stocks and overshadowed the region as a whole.</p>\n<p>(Reporting by the Shanghai Newsroom; Editing by Ramakrishnan M.)</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09988":"阿里巴巴-W","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","HSI":"恒生指数"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2157433352","content_text":"Aug 5 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended lower in a volatile session on Thursday, as uncertainty around regulatory tightening in the tech sector sapped risk appetite.\nAt the close of trade, the Hang Seng index was down 221.86 points or 0.84% at 26,204.69. The Hang Seng China Enterprises index fell 1.3% to 9,296.43.\nThe sub-index of the Hang Seng tracking technology shares dropped 2.1%, while the IT sector fell 2.31%.\nThe Chinese Communist top decision-making body at its latest meeting mentioned terms like \"anti-monopoly\" and \"curbing disorderly expansion by capital\", portending a regulatory storm that would crush tech stocks in the coming months, said Larry Hu, chief China economist at Macquarie in Hong Kong.\nThe three biggest H-share percentage decliners were Kuaishou Technology , down 15.3%, Alibaba Health Information Technology Ltd , which fell 6.17% and Country Garden Services Holdings Co Ltd, which shed 4.75%.\nAround the region, MSCI's Asia ex-Japan stock index was weaker by 0.29%, while Japan's Nikkei index closed up 0.52%.\nThis week, the MSCI Asian regional benchmark has recovered most of the ground lost a week earlier, when a series of Chinese regulatory crackdowns on sectors from property to education squeezed Chinese stocks and overshadowed the region as a whole.\n(Reporting by the Shanghai Newsroom; Editing by Ramakrishnan M.)","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"HSI":0.9,"09988":0.9,"QNETCN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":754,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":832252428,"gmtCreate":1629643720864,"gmtModify":1676530084831,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088936884410440","authorIdStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/832252428","repostId":"1128033677","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1128033677","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1629603975,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1128033677?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-22 11:46","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Cheap Stocks To Buy: Should You Watch These 5 Growth Stocks?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1128033677","media":"investors","summary":"Bull market, bear market, or trend-less market? Regardless ofwhat stage of the market cycle we're in","content":"<p>Bull market, bear market, or trend-less market? Regardless ofwhat stage of the market cycle we're in, some folks never tire of searching for cheap stocks to buy.</p>\n<p>And who doesn't love a bargain? After all, the lure of finding a stock that triples from $1 to $3 a share, or quintuples from $5 to $25, may prove irresistible.</p>\n<p>Are there any unique problems or subtle challenges with this strategy of hunting cheap stocks to buy? Yes. Let's consider a few.</p>\n<p>Hundreds of stocks trade at a \"low\" price on both the Nasdaq and the NYSE. So, how can you pick the winners consistently?</p>\n<p>Here's another problem: IBD research consistently finds that dozens, if not hundreds, of great stocks each year do not start out as penny shares. Most institutional money managers don't touch cheap stocks. Imagine a large-cap mutual fund trying to buy a meaningful stake in a stock that has been trading a dollar a share. If it has thin trading volume, the fund manager will have an awfully tough time accumulating shares without making a big impact on the stock price.</p>\n<p>Solid, increasing institutional buying makes upthe I in CAN SLIM, IBD's seven-factor paradigm ofsuccessful investing in growth stocks.</p>\n<p><b>Cheap Stocks To Buy: First, Understand These Pitfalls</b></p>\n<p>Another cold, hard truth that proponents of penny stocks don't tell you? Many low-priced shares stay low for a very long time.</p>\n<p>So, if your hard-earned money is tied up in a 50-cent stock that fails to generate meaningful capital appreciation, you might not only be nursing a losing stock. You also face the lost opportunity of investing in atrue stock market leader in Leaderboardor a member of theIBD 50, theLong-Term Leaders, orIBD Big Cap 20.</p>\n<p>Let's consider<b>Zoom Video</b>(ZM) and telemedicine pioneer<b>Teladoc</b>(TDOC) in 2020, after the coronavirus bear market ended. These two and many others traded at an \"expensive\" price when they broke out to new 52-week highs and began magnificent rallies. But the quality of their business, the supercharged growth in fundamentals, and significant buying by top-rated mutual funds affirmed that their premium share prices signaled a high level of quality.</p>\n<p>Zoom Video, after clearing adeep cup baseat 107.44 in February 2020, went on to rise nearly sixfold to its 2020 peak at 588. Today? Zoom stock is forming anew baseand testing buying support at the50-day moving average. Last month, ZM joinedSwingTraderas a new position.</p>\n<p>Teladocroared past an 86.40proper buy pointin mid-January 2020. Seven months later, the stock hit 253, up 193%. Today? TDOC stock is trying to climb back above its key50-day moving average, a critical technical level of medium-term price support and price resistance. Like Zoom, Teladoc is also deep in the weeds ofbuilding a new base.</p>\n<p><b>Zoom And Teladoc Aren't Alone</b></p>\n<p>Leaderboard member<b>Adobe</b>(ADBE) cleared a 157.99 entry in afive-week flat basein the week ended Oct. 20, 2017. The megacap tech marked a new high of 536 in early September 2020 before cooling off. And the video editing, document management, and data analytics software giant recently staged anothernew breakoutpast anew buy point, this time at 525.54.</p>\n<p>ADBE stock has rallied sharply, gaining more than 20%. Adobe has been a mainstay on theIBD Long-Term Leaders.</p>\n<p>Still, can you employ theCAN SLIM strategyfor cheap stocks to buy as well?</p>\n<p><b>5 Cheap Stocks To Watch And Buy</b></p>\n<p>TheIBD Stock Screenerfilters cheap stocks that not only trade at $10 or less per share. Some also carry many of the key fundamental, technical and fund ownership quality traits routinely seen among the greatest stock market winners.</p>\n<p>Keep in mind that liquidity is often thin. So, you might not get trade executions at an ideal price. If fund managers dump shares all at once to lock in profits, you might incur further losses when exiting the stock.</p>\n<p>So, check the gap between a cheap stock's best bid and best ask prices, or the difference between what one investor is willing to pay and another is willing to sell. The smaller the gap between bid and ask prices, the less price slippage.</p>\n<p>And don't forget the No. 1 rule of investing:keep your losses small and under control.</p>\n<p><i>Stock No. 1, screening for top IBDComposite Rating</i>:<b>Wipro</b>(WIT). The India-based IT consultant has made a superb run-up since bottoming at 2.52 at the low of the coronavirus market crash in March 2020. Shares formed aflat basethat highlights an 8.42proper buy point. Now, WIT has cleared this correct entry.</p>\n<p><b>Buy With Rules</b></p>\n<p>The5% buy zonegoes up to 8.83. So, WIT is on the verge of jumping out of the ideal buy range.</p>\n<p>TheComposite Ratingremains superlative at 97 on a scale of 1 (wizened) to 99 (wizardly). WIT also stands out with a 90Relative Strength Rating. A 94 RS Rating means Wipro has outrun 94% of all companies in the IBD database over the past 12 months.</p>\n<p>You might ask: Why is the entry point exactly at 8.42?</p>\n<p>For starters, we take the highest price on the left side of a flat base — in Wipro's case, 8.32 — then add a dime. Moving 10 cents above the base's high gives the individual trader a sense that large fund managers are earnestly accumulating shares. Again, you want the institutions working with you, not against you.</p>\n<p>Please read this Investor's Corner for more insight into finding thecorrect buy point.</p>\n<p>William O'Neil, founder of Investor's Business Daily, liked to use one-eighth of a point (or roughly 12 cents) as the amount a stock had to rise above a pivot point before he considered a stock as breaking out. Of course, until decimalization transformed the stock market at the dawn of the new millennium, the major U.S. exchanges quoted share prices in one-eighths, one-sixteenths and even one-32nds of a dollar.</p>\n<p><b>Cheap Stock No. 2</b></p>\n<p><i>Stock No. 2, screening for top IBD Composite Rating</i>:<b>Entravision Communications</b>(EVC). The Santa Monica-based Spanish language media firm owns TV stations and FM and AM radio stations across nine states. The stock broke out of a 4.52entry pointin surging volume during the week ended May 21.</p>\n<p>Three weeks ago, the stock made a sound first test of buying support at the10-week moving averagenear 5.62. Yet this week, EVC is pulling back hard and eyeing another test of institutional support near that 10-week line, which has now risen to 6.34.</p>\n<p>Buying shares as close as possible to the 10-week moving average amid a healthy rebound offers the intrepid trader asecondary buy point.</p>\n<p>Entravision's IBD ratings include an 86 Composite, which is below a preferable level of 90 or higher; 98 Relative Strength; anup/down volume ratioof 1.5; and back to a solid A- forAccumulation/Distribution. The stock also pays a dividend; due to recent strong price gains, the annualized yield has dropped to 1.6%.</p>\n<p>The company reported strong second-quarter results on Aug. 5. Earnings tripled to 9 cents a share as revenue vaulted 295% vs. a year ago to $178 million.</p>\n<p><b>Premium IBD Ratings Galore</b></p>\n<p><i>Stock No. 3, screening for topComposite Rating</i>:<b>Loma Negra</b>(LOMA). The Argentine cement, concrete, aggregates and lime supplier posted a 500% jump in first-quarter earnings vs. a year earlier to 24 cents a share. Sales accelerated to a 37% gain to $143 million, according toMarketSmith. TheIBD relative strength linebolted to new 52-week highs recently.</p>\n<p>Loma Negra briefly pulled back into the5% buy zoneafter clearing abase-on-base patternat 6.79. The buy zone goes up to 7.13. However, like other commodity stocks, LOMA has fallen sharply in recent days.</p>\n<p>In short, don't chase the stock. Good time to wait and watch.</p>\n<p>Loma'sComposite Ratinghas fallen to an unsavory 69 rating. The 86 RS Rating is good but not great anymore.</p>\n<p>An 86 RS score means over the past 12 months Loma has outperformed 86% of all companies in the IBD database.</p>\n<p><b>A Former Huge Winner In Apparel Retail</b></p>\n<p><i>Stock No. 4, screening for topRelative Strength Rating</i>:<b>Chico's FAS</b>(CHS). The former leader of IBD's retail apparel and shoes industry group is continuing to make atest of the 10-week lineafter clearing acup-without-handle basein March at 4.22.</p>\n<p>The first and second rallies off the 10-week line — near 5.76 during the week ended July 23 — after astrong breakoutpose as secondary entry points.</p>\n<p>Due to the recent pullback, it's now beginning to look as if CHS will form anew base.</p>\n<p>Among cheap apparel stocks to buy, Chico's sports a top-drawer 99 RS Rating. This means its relative strength is top-notch. Put another way, CHS has outperformed 99% of all companies in the IBD database over the past 12 months.</p>\n<p>On the fundamentals side, at least eight quarters in a row of net losses by the Fort Myers, Fla., firm weigh on the drab 69Composite Rating. But sales rebounded 38% in the April-ended fiscal first quarter to $388 million. According to Yahoo Finance, one analyst thinks Chico's will post a net loss of 4 cents a share in the July-ended second quarter; another analyst targets an 11-cent loss. The women's apparel chain lost 40 cents a share in the year-ago quarter.</p>\n<p>The consensus forecast calls for a 33% jump in the top line, however, to $407.4 million. Look for Q2 results in late August.</p>\n<p><b>Chip Leader Stumbles</b></p>\n<p><i>Stock No. 5, screening for Fastest Growing Earnings Per Share</i>:<b>United Microelectronics</b>(UMC). The Taiwan-based integrated circuit maker has risen nearly fourfold after a July 2020 breakout around 3. Anew baseoffers an earlyentry pointat 9.92, 10 cents above the high in the week ended June 4.</p>\n<p>On July 29, UMC stock broke out with an 8% gain and rallied into the5% buy zone, which goes up to 10.42 from the 9.92 buy point. But UMC has retreated sharply. On the bright side, UMC is holding above the key 10-week moving average. And it remains mildly above the 9.92breakout point.</p>\n<p>A key rule is to never let a stock that shows a double-digit percentage gain turn into afull round trip— even among cheap stocks.</p>\n<p>United's earnings per share have grown 50%, 350%, 225%, 167%, 400% and 100% vs. year-ago levels in the past six quarters on sales increases of 32%, 30%, 28%, 15%, 19% and 21%. Solid numbers for bothComposite Rating(94) and Relative Strength (95); however, these ratings are best used for selecting stocks to buy, not for timing any entries or exits.</p>\n<p>UMC holds a best-possible A grade for theSMR Rating, which measures sales, margins andreturn on equity.</p>\n<p><b>A Strong Second Quarter</b></p>\n<p>United Micro reported robust second-quarter results on July 28. According to Yahoo Finance, one analyst saw UMC notching a net profit of 13 cents per share while another saw 15 cents vs. 9 cents a year ago. The company exceeded both analysts' views with profit of 18 cents a share, doubling the 9 cents it earned a year earlier.</p>\n<p>Sales grew 21% to $1.82 billion. This increase also marked a second quarter in a row of accelerating growth. The top line rose 15% in Q4 2020 and accelerated 19% in Q1 this year.</p>\n<p><b>More Trading Ideas</b></p>\n<p>Several weeks ago, these two cheap stocks made either the \"Accelerating Sales\" or \"Top Relative Strength Rating\" segment ofIBD Stock Screener:&nbsp;<b>Dynavax Technologies</b>(DVAX) and&nbsp;<b>JMP Group</b>(JMP).</p>\n<p>Both stocks move sharply week to week, yet are respecting a key technical support level, the10-week moving average.</p>\n<p>JMP cleared a 6.45buy pointin afour-month cup with handle. However,the handleformed near the middle of its cup pattern. You'd prefer to see the handle begin forming when a stock has climbed to within 5%, 10% or possibly 15% of its 52-week high.</p>\n<p>Notice how JMP still trades below the cup's left-side peak of 7.30 and its 52-week peak of 8.99.</p>\n<p>Dynavax is retreating fast after a big breakout past acup with handleand a 10.45entry point. Shares are still extended pastthe 5% buy zoneafter clearing 10.45.</p>","source":"lsy1610449120050","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Cheap Stocks To Buy: Should You Watch These 5 Growth Stocks?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCheap Stocks To Buy: Should You Watch These 5 Growth Stocks?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2021-08-22 11:46 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.investors.com/research/cheap-stocks-to-buy/?src=A00220><strong>investors</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Bull market, bear market, or trend-less market? Regardless ofwhat stage of the market cycle we're in, some folks never tire of searching for cheap stocks to buy.\nAnd who doesn't love a bargain? After ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.investors.com/research/cheap-stocks-to-buy/?src=A00220\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"EVC":"超视野传播","CHS":"Chicos Fas Inc","LOMA":"Loma Negra Compania Industrial Argentina S.A.","WIT":"Wipro Limited","UMC":"联电"},"source_url":"https://www.investors.com/research/cheap-stocks-to-buy/?src=A00220","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1128033677","content_text":"Bull market, bear market, or trend-less market? Regardless ofwhat stage of the market cycle we're in, some folks never tire of searching for cheap stocks to buy.\nAnd who doesn't love a bargain? After all, the lure of finding a stock that triples from $1 to $3 a share, or quintuples from $5 to $25, may prove irresistible.\nAre there any unique problems or subtle challenges with this strategy of hunting cheap stocks to buy? Yes. Let's consider a few.\nHundreds of stocks trade at a \"low\" price on both the Nasdaq and the NYSE. So, how can you pick the winners consistently?\nHere's another problem: IBD research consistently finds that dozens, if not hundreds, of great stocks each year do not start out as penny shares. Most institutional money managers don't touch cheap stocks. Imagine a large-cap mutual fund trying to buy a meaningful stake in a stock that has been trading a dollar a share. If it has thin trading volume, the fund manager will have an awfully tough time accumulating shares without making a big impact on the stock price.\nSolid, increasing institutional buying makes upthe I in CAN SLIM, IBD's seven-factor paradigm ofsuccessful investing in growth stocks.\nCheap Stocks To Buy: First, Understand These Pitfalls\nAnother cold, hard truth that proponents of penny stocks don't tell you? Many low-priced shares stay low for a very long time.\nSo, if your hard-earned money is tied up in a 50-cent stock that fails to generate meaningful capital appreciation, you might not only be nursing a losing stock. You also face the lost opportunity of investing in atrue stock market leader in Leaderboardor a member of theIBD 50, theLong-Term Leaders, orIBD Big Cap 20.\nLet's considerZoom Video(ZM) and telemedicine pioneerTeladoc(TDOC) in 2020, after the coronavirus bear market ended. These two and many others traded at an \"expensive\" price when they broke out to new 52-week highs and began magnificent rallies. But the quality of their business, the supercharged growth in fundamentals, and significant buying by top-rated mutual funds affirmed that their premium share prices signaled a high level of quality.\nZoom Video, after clearing adeep cup baseat 107.44 in February 2020, went on to rise nearly sixfold to its 2020 peak at 588. Today? Zoom stock is forming anew baseand testing buying support at the50-day moving average. Last month, ZM joinedSwingTraderas a new position.\nTeladocroared past an 86.40proper buy pointin mid-January 2020. Seven months later, the stock hit 253, up 193%. Today? TDOC stock is trying to climb back above its key50-day moving average, a critical technical level of medium-term price support and price resistance. Like Zoom, Teladoc is also deep in the weeds ofbuilding a new base.\nZoom And Teladoc Aren't Alone\nLeaderboard memberAdobe(ADBE) cleared a 157.99 entry in afive-week flat basein the week ended Oct. 20, 2017. The megacap tech marked a new high of 536 in early September 2020 before cooling off. And the video editing, document management, and data analytics software giant recently staged anothernew breakoutpast anew buy point, this time at 525.54.\nADBE stock has rallied sharply, gaining more than 20%. Adobe has been a mainstay on theIBD Long-Term Leaders.\nStill, can you employ theCAN SLIM strategyfor cheap stocks to buy as well?\n5 Cheap Stocks To Watch And Buy\nTheIBD Stock Screenerfilters cheap stocks that not only trade at $10 or less per share. Some also carry many of the key fundamental, technical and fund ownership quality traits routinely seen among the greatest stock market winners.\nKeep in mind that liquidity is often thin. So, you might not get trade executions at an ideal price. If fund managers dump shares all at once to lock in profits, you might incur further losses when exiting the stock.\nSo, check the gap between a cheap stock's best bid and best ask prices, or the difference between what one investor is willing to pay and another is willing to sell. The smaller the gap between bid and ask prices, the less price slippage.\nAnd don't forget the No. 1 rule of investing:keep your losses small and under control.\nStock No. 1, screening for top IBDComposite Rating:Wipro(WIT). The India-based IT consultant has made a superb run-up since bottoming at 2.52 at the low of the coronavirus market crash in March 2020. Shares formed aflat basethat highlights an 8.42proper buy point. Now, WIT has cleared this correct entry.\nBuy With Rules\nThe5% buy zonegoes up to 8.83. So, WIT is on the verge of jumping out of the ideal buy range.\nTheComposite Ratingremains superlative at 97 on a scale of 1 (wizened) to 99 (wizardly). WIT also stands out with a 90Relative Strength Rating. A 94 RS Rating means Wipro has outrun 94% of all companies in the IBD database over the past 12 months.\nYou might ask: Why is the entry point exactly at 8.42?\nFor starters, we take the highest price on the left side of a flat base — in Wipro's case, 8.32 — then add a dime. Moving 10 cents above the base's high gives the individual trader a sense that large fund managers are earnestly accumulating shares. Again, you want the institutions working with you, not against you.\nPlease read this Investor's Corner for more insight into finding thecorrect buy point.\nWilliam O'Neil, founder of Investor's Business Daily, liked to use one-eighth of a point (or roughly 12 cents) as the amount a stock had to rise above a pivot point before he considered a stock as breaking out. Of course, until decimalization transformed the stock market at the dawn of the new millennium, the major U.S. exchanges quoted share prices in one-eighths, one-sixteenths and even one-32nds of a dollar.\nCheap Stock No. 2\nStock No. 2, screening for top IBD Composite Rating:Entravision Communications(EVC). The Santa Monica-based Spanish language media firm owns TV stations and FM and AM radio stations across nine states. The stock broke out of a 4.52entry pointin surging volume during the week ended May 21.\nThree weeks ago, the stock made a sound first test of buying support at the10-week moving averagenear 5.62. Yet this week, EVC is pulling back hard and eyeing another test of institutional support near that 10-week line, which has now risen to 6.34.\nBuying shares as close as possible to the 10-week moving average amid a healthy rebound offers the intrepid trader asecondary buy point.\nEntravision's IBD ratings include an 86 Composite, which is below a preferable level of 90 or higher; 98 Relative Strength; anup/down volume ratioof 1.5; and back to a solid A- forAccumulation/Distribution. The stock also pays a dividend; due to recent strong price gains, the annualized yield has dropped to 1.6%.\nThe company reported strong second-quarter results on Aug. 5. Earnings tripled to 9 cents a share as revenue vaulted 295% vs. a year ago to $178 million.\nPremium IBD Ratings Galore\nStock No. 3, screening for topComposite Rating:Loma Negra(LOMA). The Argentine cement, concrete, aggregates and lime supplier posted a 500% jump in first-quarter earnings vs. a year earlier to 24 cents a share. Sales accelerated to a 37% gain to $143 million, according toMarketSmith. TheIBD relative strength linebolted to new 52-week highs recently.\nLoma Negra briefly pulled back into the5% buy zoneafter clearing abase-on-base patternat 6.79. The buy zone goes up to 7.13. However, like other commodity stocks, LOMA has fallen sharply in recent days.\nIn short, don't chase the stock. Good time to wait and watch.\nLoma'sComposite Ratinghas fallen to an unsavory 69 rating. The 86 RS Rating is good but not great anymore.\nAn 86 RS score means over the past 12 months Loma has outperformed 86% of all companies in the IBD database.\nA Former Huge Winner In Apparel Retail\nStock No. 4, screening for topRelative Strength Rating:Chico's FAS(CHS). The former leader of IBD's retail apparel and shoes industry group is continuing to make atest of the 10-week lineafter clearing acup-without-handle basein March at 4.22.\nThe first and second rallies off the 10-week line — near 5.76 during the week ended July 23 — after astrong breakoutpose as secondary entry points.\nDue to the recent pullback, it's now beginning to look as if CHS will form anew base.\nAmong cheap apparel stocks to buy, Chico's sports a top-drawer 99 RS Rating. This means its relative strength is top-notch. Put another way, CHS has outperformed 99% of all companies in the IBD database over the past 12 months.\nOn the fundamentals side, at least eight quarters in a row of net losses by the Fort Myers, Fla., firm weigh on the drab 69Composite Rating. But sales rebounded 38% in the April-ended fiscal first quarter to $388 million. According to Yahoo Finance, one analyst thinks Chico's will post a net loss of 4 cents a share in the July-ended second quarter; another analyst targets an 11-cent loss. The women's apparel chain lost 40 cents a share in the year-ago quarter.\nThe consensus forecast calls for a 33% jump in the top line, however, to $407.4 million. Look for Q2 results in late August.\nChip Leader Stumbles\nStock No. 5, screening for Fastest Growing Earnings Per Share:United Microelectronics(UMC). The Taiwan-based integrated circuit maker has risen nearly fourfold after a July 2020 breakout around 3. Anew baseoffers an earlyentry pointat 9.92, 10 cents above the high in the week ended June 4.\nOn July 29, UMC stock broke out with an 8% gain and rallied into the5% buy zone, which goes up to 10.42 from the 9.92 buy point. But UMC has retreated sharply. On the bright side, UMC is holding above the key 10-week moving average. And it remains mildly above the 9.92breakout point.\nA key rule is to never let a stock that shows a double-digit percentage gain turn into afull round trip— even among cheap stocks.\nUnited's earnings per share have grown 50%, 350%, 225%, 167%, 400% and 100% vs. year-ago levels in the past six quarters on sales increases of 32%, 30%, 28%, 15%, 19% and 21%. Solid numbers for bothComposite Rating(94) and Relative Strength (95); however, these ratings are best used for selecting stocks to buy, not for timing any entries or exits.\nUMC holds a best-possible A grade for theSMR Rating, which measures sales, margins andreturn on equity.\nA Strong Second Quarter\nUnited Micro reported robust second-quarter results on July 28. According to Yahoo Finance, one analyst saw UMC notching a net profit of 13 cents per share while another saw 15 cents vs. 9 cents a year ago. The company exceeded both analysts' views with profit of 18 cents a share, doubling the 9 cents it earned a year earlier.\nSales grew 21% to $1.82 billion. This increase also marked a second quarter in a row of accelerating growth. The top line rose 15% in Q4 2020 and accelerated 19% in Q1 this year.\nMore Trading Ideas\nSeveral weeks ago, these two cheap stocks made either the \"Accelerating Sales\" or \"Top Relative Strength Rating\" segment ofIBD Stock Screener: Dynavax Technologies(DVAX) and JMP Group(JMP).\nBoth stocks move sharply week to week, yet are respecting a key technical support level, the10-week moving average.\nJMP cleared a 6.45buy pointin afour-month cup with handle. However,the handleformed near the middle of its cup pattern. You'd prefer to see the handle begin forming when a stock has climbed to within 5%, 10% or possibly 15% of its 52-week high.\nNotice how JMP still trades below the cup's left-side peak of 7.30 and its 52-week peak of 8.99.\nDynavax is retreating fast after a big breakout past acup with handleand a 10.45entry point. Shares are still extended pastthe 5% buy zoneafter clearing 10.45.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"CHS":0.9,"UMC":0.9,"EVC":0.9,"WIT":0.9,"LOMA":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2164,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":899957722,"gmtCreate":1628154470566,"gmtModify":1703502212315,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088936884410440","authorIdStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/899957722","repostId":"2157433352","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2157433352","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Reuters.com brings you the latest news from around the world, covering breaking news in markets, business, politics, entertainment and technology","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Reuters","id":"1036604489","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868"},"pubTimestamp":1628153095,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2157433352?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-05 16:44","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Hong Kong stocks end lower on tech regulatory worries","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2157433352","media":"Reuters","summary":"Aug 5 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended lower in a volatile session on Thursday, as uncertainty aro","content":"<p>Aug 5 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended lower in a volatile session on Thursday, as uncertainty around regulatory tightening in the tech sector sapped risk appetite.</p>\n<p>At the close of trade, the Hang Seng index was down 221.86 points or 0.84% at 26,204.69. The Hang Seng China Enterprises index fell 1.3% to 9,296.43.</p>\n<p>The sub-index of the Hang Seng tracking technology shares&nbsp;dropped 2.1%, while the IT sector fell 2.31%.</p>\n<p>The Chinese Communist top decision-making body at its latest meeting mentioned terms like \"anti-monopoly\" and \"curbing disorderly expansion by capital\", portending a regulatory storm that would crush tech stocks in the coming months, said Larry Hu, chief China economist at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MQG.AU\">Macquarie</a> in Hong Kong.</p>\n<p>The three biggest H-share percentage decliners were Kuaishou Technology , down 15.3%, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ALBBY\">Alibaba Health Information Technology Ltd</a> , which fell 6.17% and Country Garden Services Holdings Co Ltd, which shed 4.75%.</p>\n<p>Around the region, MSCI's Asia ex-Japan stock index&nbsp;was weaker by 0.29%, while Japan's Nikkei index&nbsp;closed up 0.52%.</p>\n<p>This week, the MSCI Asian regional benchmark has recovered most of the ground lost a week earlier, when a series of Chinese regulatory crackdowns on sectors from property to education squeezed Chinese stocks and overshadowed the region as a whole.</p>\n<p>(Reporting by the Shanghai Newsroom; Editing by Ramakrishnan M.)</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Hong Kong stocks end lower on tech regulatory worries</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nHong Kong stocks end lower on tech regulatory worries\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1036604489\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/443ce19704621c837795676028cec868);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Reuters </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-05 16:44</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Aug 5 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended lower in a volatile session on Thursday, as uncertainty around regulatory tightening in the tech sector sapped risk appetite.</p>\n<p>At the close of trade, the Hang Seng index was down 221.86 points or 0.84% at 26,204.69. The Hang Seng China Enterprises index fell 1.3% to 9,296.43.</p>\n<p>The sub-index of the Hang Seng tracking technology shares&nbsp;dropped 2.1%, while the IT sector fell 2.31%.</p>\n<p>The Chinese Communist top decision-making body at its latest meeting mentioned terms like \"anti-monopoly\" and \"curbing disorderly expansion by capital\", portending a regulatory storm that would crush tech stocks in the coming months, said Larry Hu, chief China economist at <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MQG.AU\">Macquarie</a> in Hong Kong.</p>\n<p>The three biggest H-share percentage decliners were Kuaishou Technology , down 15.3%, <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ALBBY\">Alibaba Health Information Technology Ltd</a> , which fell 6.17% and Country Garden Services Holdings Co Ltd, which shed 4.75%.</p>\n<p>Around the region, MSCI's Asia ex-Japan stock index&nbsp;was weaker by 0.29%, while Japan's Nikkei index&nbsp;closed up 0.52%.</p>\n<p>This week, the MSCI Asian regional benchmark has recovered most of the ground lost a week earlier, when a series of Chinese regulatory crackdowns on sectors from property to education squeezed Chinese stocks and overshadowed the region as a whole.</p>\n<p>(Reporting by the Shanghai Newsroom; Editing by Ramakrishnan M.)</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"09988":"阿里巴巴-W","QNETCN":"纳斯达克中美互联网老虎指数","HSI":"恒生指数"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2157433352","content_text":"Aug 5 (Reuters) - Hong Kong stocks ended lower in a volatile session on Thursday, as uncertainty around regulatory tightening in the tech sector sapped risk appetite.\nAt the close of trade, the Hang Seng index was down 221.86 points or 0.84% at 26,204.69. The Hang Seng China Enterprises index fell 1.3% to 9,296.43.\nThe sub-index of the Hang Seng tracking technology shares dropped 2.1%, while the IT sector fell 2.31%.\nThe Chinese Communist top decision-making body at its latest meeting mentioned terms like \"anti-monopoly\" and \"curbing disorderly expansion by capital\", portending a regulatory storm that would crush tech stocks in the coming months, said Larry Hu, chief China economist at Macquarie in Hong Kong.\nThe three biggest H-share percentage decliners were Kuaishou Technology , down 15.3%, Alibaba Health Information Technology Ltd , which fell 6.17% and Country Garden Services Holdings Co Ltd, which shed 4.75%.\nAround the region, MSCI's Asia ex-Japan stock index was weaker by 0.29%, while Japan's Nikkei index closed up 0.52%.\nThis week, the MSCI Asian regional benchmark has recovered most of the ground lost a week earlier, when a series of Chinese regulatory crackdowns on sectors from property to education squeezed Chinese stocks and overshadowed the region as a whole.\n(Reporting by the Shanghai Newsroom; Editing by Ramakrishnan M.)","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"HSI":0.9,"09988":0.9,"QNETCN":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":463,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":896936796,"gmtCreate":1628550881615,"gmtModify":1703507831953,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088936884410440","authorIdStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":6,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/896936796","repostId":"1142685473","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2743,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":806644991,"gmtCreate":1627655317213,"gmtModify":1703494255955,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088936884410440","authorIdStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Oh no","listText":"Oh no","text":"Oh no","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":2,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/806644991","repostId":"1158096627","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1158096627","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Providing stock market headlines, business news, financials and earnings ","home_visible":1,"media_name":"Tiger Newspress","id":"1079075236","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba"},"pubTimestamp":1627654347,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1158096627?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-07-30 22:12","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Atlassian stock Popped 26% as results, outlook beat Street view","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1158096627","media":"Tiger Newspress","summary":"Atlassian Corp. shares surged 26% in Friday morning trading after the business collaboration softwar","content":"<p>Atlassian Corp. shares surged&nbsp;26% in Friday morning trading after the business collaboration software company's results and outlook topped the Wall Street consensus. </p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a8f240e071d442c98a8269476186fd9a\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>The company reported a fiscal fourth-quarter loss of $213.1 million, or 85 cents a share, compared with a loss of $385.2 million, or $1.56 a share, in the year-ago period. Adjusted earnings, which exclude stock-based compensation expenses and other items, were 24 cents a share, compared with 25 cents a share in the year-ago period. Revenue rose to $559.5 million from $430.5 million in the year-ago quarter. Analysts surveyed by FactSet had forecast 18 cents a share on revenue of $471.6 million. Atlassian forecast adjusted earnings of 38 cents to 39 cents a share on revenue of $575 million to $590 million for the first quarter. Analysts had estimated 30 cents a share on revenue of $539.1 million.</p>\n<p>Atlassian stock price target raised to $370 from $310 at Mizuho.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Atlassian stock Popped 26% as results, outlook beat Street view</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nAtlassian stock Popped 26% as results, outlook beat Street view\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<a class=\"head\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/wemedia/1079075236\">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/8274c5b9d4c2852bfb1c4d6ce16c68ba);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Tiger Newspress </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-07-30 22:12</p>\n</div>\n\n</a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Atlassian Corp. shares surged&nbsp;26% in Friday morning trading after the business collaboration software company's results and outlook topped the Wall Street consensus. </p>\n<p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a8f240e071d442c98a8269476186fd9a\" tg-width=\"840\" tg-height=\"470\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"></p>\n<p>The company reported a fiscal fourth-quarter loss of $213.1 million, or 85 cents a share, compared with a loss of $385.2 million, or $1.56 a share, in the year-ago period. Adjusted earnings, which exclude stock-based compensation expenses and other items, were 24 cents a share, compared with 25 cents a share in the year-ago period. Revenue rose to $559.5 million from $430.5 million in the year-ago quarter. Analysts surveyed by FactSet had forecast 18 cents a share on revenue of $471.6 million. Atlassian forecast adjusted earnings of 38 cents to 39 cents a share on revenue of $575 million to $590 million for the first quarter. Analysts had estimated 30 cents a share on revenue of $539.1 million.</p>\n<p>Atlassian stock price target raised to $370 from $310 at Mizuho.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TEAM":"Atlassian Corporation PLC"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1158096627","content_text":"Atlassian Corp. shares surged 26% in Friday morning trading after the business collaboration software company's results and outlook topped the Wall Street consensus. \n\nThe company reported a fiscal fourth-quarter loss of $213.1 million, or 85 cents a share, compared with a loss of $385.2 million, or $1.56 a share, in the year-ago period. Adjusted earnings, which exclude stock-based compensation expenses and other items, were 24 cents a share, compared with 25 cents a share in the year-ago period. Revenue rose to $559.5 million from $430.5 million in the year-ago quarter. Analysts surveyed by FactSet had forecast 18 cents a share on revenue of $471.6 million. Atlassian forecast adjusted earnings of 38 cents to 39 cents a share on revenue of $575 million to $590 million for the first quarter. Analysts had estimated 30 cents a share on revenue of $539.1 million.\nAtlassian stock price target raised to $370 from $310 at Mizuho.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TEAM":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":374,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":831928604,"gmtCreate":1629281353608,"gmtModify":1676529989839,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088936884410440","authorIdStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/831928604","repostId":"1160063301","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1160063301","kind":"news","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Stock Market Quotes, Business News, Financial News, Trading Ideas, and Stock Research by Professionals","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Benzinga","id":"1052270027","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa"},"pubTimestamp":1629279635,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1160063301?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-18 17:40","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Apple Sees Delay In Its Shift Away From China Due To COVID-19: Report","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1160063301","media":"Benzinga","summary":"Apple is slowing plans to shift production from China to Vietnam as governments tighten border contr","content":"<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a></b>&nbsp;is slowing plans to shift production from&nbsp;<b>China</b>&nbsp;to&nbsp;<b>Vietnam</b>&nbsp;as governments tighten border controls to contain outbreaks of new variants of the coronavirus, Nikkei Asiareportedon Tuesday, citing sources.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;The Cupertino, California-based tech giant plans to start mass production of its latest&nbsp;<b>AirPods</b>&nbsp;earphones in China instead of Vietnam as previously planned.</p>\n<p>Apple reportedly still aims to move around 20% of new AirPods production to Vietnam at some point in the future.</p>\n<p>AirPods were among the first products that Apple began making in significant amounts in Vietnam after moving production there about two years ago during the peak of U.S.-China trade tensions.</p>\n<p>The&nbsp;<b>Tim Cook</b>-led company's plan to bring some&nbsp;<b>MacBook</b>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<b>iPad</b>&nbsp;production to Vietnam has also been put on hold.</p>\n<p>Apple is not alone, as other tech biggies such as Google parent&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a> and&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a> are facing similar delays, the Nikkei&nbsp;noted.</p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;Vietnam’s young labor force made it an ideal draw for U.S. based tech manufacturers, especially when Washington began imposing punitive tariffs on Chinese-made goods in 2018. Suppliers of Apple, Google, Amazon, Microsoft and&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DELL\">Dell Technologies Inc.</a> have already set up or expanded factories in the country over the past few years.</p>\n<p>Both China and Vietnam have adopted stricter border control measures this year, which has slowed the production shift between the two countries due to COVID-19 resurgence and government measures.</p>\n<p><b>Price Action:</b>&nbsp;Apple shares closed 0.62% lower at $150.19 on Tuesday.</p>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Apple Sees Delay In Its Shift Away From China Due To COVID-19: Report</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nApple Sees Delay In Its Shift Away From China Due To COVID-19: Report\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/d08bf7808052c0ca9deb4e944cae32aa);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Benzinga </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2021-08-18 17:40</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">Apple</a></b>&nbsp;is slowing plans to shift production from&nbsp;<b>China</b>&nbsp;to&nbsp;<b>Vietnam</b>&nbsp;as governments tighten border controls to contain outbreaks of new variants of the coronavirus, Nikkei Asiareportedon Tuesday, citing sources.</p>\n<p><b>What Happened:</b>&nbsp;The Cupertino, California-based tech giant plans to start mass production of its latest&nbsp;<b>AirPods</b>&nbsp;earphones in China instead of Vietnam as previously planned.</p>\n<p>Apple reportedly still aims to move around 20% of new AirPods production to Vietnam at some point in the future.</p>\n<p>AirPods were among the first products that Apple began making in significant amounts in Vietnam after moving production there about two years ago during the peak of U.S.-China trade tensions.</p>\n<p>The&nbsp;<b>Tim Cook</b>-led company's plan to bring some&nbsp;<b>MacBook</b>&nbsp;and&nbsp;<b>iPad</b>&nbsp;production to Vietnam has also been put on hold.</p>\n<p>Apple is not alone, as other tech biggies such as Google parent&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/GOOG\">Alphabet</a> and&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AMZN\">Amazon.com</a> are facing similar delays, the Nikkei&nbsp;noted.</p>\n<p><b>Why It Matters:</b>&nbsp;Vietnam’s young labor force made it an ideal draw for U.S. based tech manufacturers, especially when Washington began imposing punitive tariffs on Chinese-made goods in 2018. Suppliers of Apple, Google, Amazon, Microsoft and&nbsp;<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/DELL\">Dell Technologies Inc.</a> have already set up or expanded factories in the country over the past few years.</p>\n<p>Both China and Vietnam have adopted stricter border control measures this year, which has slowed the production shift between the two countries due to COVID-19 resurgence and government measures.</p>\n<p><b>Price Action:</b>&nbsp;Apple shares closed 0.62% lower at $150.19 on Tuesday.</p>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"AAPL":"苹果"},"is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1160063301","content_text":"Apple is slowing plans to shift production from China to Vietnam as governments tighten border controls to contain outbreaks of new variants of the coronavirus, Nikkei Asiareportedon Tuesday, citing sources.\nWhat Happened: The Cupertino, California-based tech giant plans to start mass production of its latest AirPods earphones in China instead of Vietnam as previously planned.\nApple reportedly still aims to move around 20% of new AirPods production to Vietnam at some point in the future.\nAirPods were among the first products that Apple began making in significant amounts in Vietnam after moving production there about two years ago during the peak of U.S.-China trade tensions.\nThe Tim Cook-led company's plan to bring some MacBook and iPad production to Vietnam has also been put on hold.\nApple is not alone, as other tech biggies such as Google parent Alphabet and Amazon.com are facing similar delays, the Nikkei noted.\nWhy It Matters: Vietnam’s young labor force made it an ideal draw for U.S. based tech manufacturers, especially when Washington began imposing punitive tariffs on Chinese-made goods in 2018. Suppliers of Apple, Google, Amazon, Microsoft and Dell Technologies Inc. have already set up or expanded factories in the country over the past few years.\nBoth China and Vietnam have adopted stricter border control measures this year, which has slowed the production shift between the two countries due to COVID-19 resurgence and government measures.\nPrice Action: Apple shares closed 0.62% lower at $150.19 on Tuesday.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"AAPL":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2770,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":830905754,"gmtCreate":1628997510978,"gmtModify":1676529907253,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088936884410440","authorIdStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":1,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/830905754","repostId":"2159145532","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2841,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":893635206,"gmtCreate":1628258927005,"gmtModify":1703504144900,"author":{"id":"4088936884410440","authorId":"4088936884410440","name":"NicoleL","avatar":"https://static.laohu8.com/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4088936884410440","authorIdStr":"4088936884410440"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Let’s c","listText":"Let’s c","text":"Let’s c","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/893635206","repostId":"1187374387","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":669,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"lives":[]}