• Like
  • Comment
  • Favorite

U.S. Regulators Propose More Lenient Capital Rules for Big Banks -- Update

Dow Jones03-19 21:58

By Dylan Tokar

America's biggest banks will be allowed to hold billions of dollars less in capital on their books under a new proposal, a change officials say will free up their ability to lend and compete with private-credit firms and other rivals.

The proposal introduced Thursday would hand a major victory to big banks, which had resisted sharply higher requirements proposed under the Biden administration. Wall Street's embrace of a second Trump administration had largely centered on the prospect that plans for those stricter requirements would be scrapped.

The Federal Reserve is scheduled to vote on the proposal later Thursday.

Big banks received massive bailouts in the 2008-09 financial crisis , prompting policymakers to impose higher capital requirements and other tightened controls designed to protect against a future crash. The measures limited their ability to lend and helped open the door to private-credit firms and other nonbank lenders, which had been booming until running into more recent turbulence.

One proposed response -- part of an international agreement known as the Basel accords -- languished for years until a series of bank failures in 2023. The bank collapses prompted the Federal Reserve during the Biden administration to take up Basel and propose even higher capital buffers as a safety net for turbulent times.

JPMorgan Chase and other big banks waged an intense lobbying campaign to fight the tightened rules, including with TV ads during National Football League games.

The revisions proposed Thursday, spearheaded by the Federal Reserve, would finally implement the Basel accords. Taken alone, the Basel proposal would create a mild increase in big banks' capital buffers. But regulators are also attempting to simplify overall capital rules and proposing changes to other rules. Combined, the changes will amount to banks holding less capital overall.

The changes would cumulatively let the largest banks hold on average 2.4% less capital, or roughly $20 billion less than they currently do. Prior rule changes under the Trump administration, including around big banks' stress tests, would bring that number to 4.8%.

Midsized banks would be allowed to decrease their capital buffers by an average of 3%, and smaller banks by 7.8%. The exact capital buffer will differ for each bank.

Prior proposals during the Biden administration envisioned estimated hikes of first up to 20%, then 9%, for the largest banks.

The looser rules could help banks win back business, but would come just as private-credit firms are facing turbulence after years of growth. Investors spooked by the prospect of defaults in their funds have recently rushed to redeem their money -- and found themselves turned away because of caps on how much firms will redeem in any given quarter.

Updates to follow as news develops

Write to Dylan Tokar at dylan.tokar@wsj.com

 

(END) Dow Jones Newswires

March 19, 2026 09:58 ET (13:58 GMT)

Copyright (c) 2026 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.

At the request of the copyright holder, you need to log in to view this content

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment

empty
No comments yet
 
 
 
 

Most Discussed

 
 
 
 
 

7x24