To The Moon
Home
News
TigerAI
Log In
Sign Up
seraph2020
+Follow
Posts · 88
Posts · 88
Following · 0
Following · 0
Followers · 0
Followers · 0
seraph2020
seraph2020
·
2022-04-29
Good
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
2.39K
回复
Comment
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
seraph2020
seraph2020
·
2022-04-20
Good
Sorry, this post has been deleted
看
2.90K
回复
Comment
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
seraph2020
seraph2020
·
2022-04-14
Good
Night Reading | Buffett's 40 sentences are highly recommended by Duan Yongping
巴菲特说,不管一家公司是大盘、小盘、中盘、还是超小盘,我们只考虑这么几点:这家公司的生意我们能不能看懂?这家公司的管理层我们喜不喜欢?这家公司的价格是否便宜?1998年,巴菲特在佛罗里达大学商学院做了
Night Reading | Buffett's 40 sentences are highly recommended by Duan Yongping
看
3.05K
回复
Comment
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
seraph2020
seraph2020
·
2022-03-22
Good
Night Reading | Munger: Do these things well, and the road to wealth and freedom is simple
芒格认为,每个人想参与投资游戏的人都必须了解自己的天性,都必须在考虑自己的边际效用和心理承受能力后才能开始投资。几十年以来,在股神巴菲特的光环背后默默站着一个人,他就是查理·芒格。他们年轻时相识,彼此
Night Reading | Munger: Do these things well, and the road to wealth and freedom is simple
看
2.93K
回复
Comment
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
seraph2020
seraph2020
·
2021-08-31
Good
市值突破2.5萬億美元,回購近4500億美元,iPhone13你會買嗎?
@侃见财经:
時間是優秀企業的朋友,平庸企業的敵人——巴菲特 五年前,當巴菲特第一次買入蘋果公司時,恰逢蘋果$蘋果(AAPL)$ 業績出現了拐點,對於巴菲特的操作,華爾街不少分析師認爲,“股神”老矣。五年時間過去了,2018年美股大跌,去年因爲疫情美股大跌,均是蘋果公司挽救了股神的名聲,讓巴菲特不至於在臨近退休的最後幾年裏跌落“神壇”。近期,巴菲特旗下的伯克希爾哈撒韋向美國SEC提交了13F表,文件顯示,伯克希爾哈撒韋公司前三大持倉分別爲蘋果、美國銀行以及美國運通,值得一提的是伯克希爾持有8.87億股蘋果公司股票,佔其持倉比例爲41.45%,而伯克希爾哈撒韋第二大持倉股美國銀行也僅佔其持倉的14.21%,差距明顯。至於巴菲特爲什麼如此偏愛蘋果公司。答案是太賺錢了。段永平曾經說過,不賺錢的生意,多少營業額都沒有用。爲此他還曾舉過一個例子,他說比如你在沒有人煙的地方建一個酒店,花了一億,每年虧500萬,重置成本還是一個億,當下想5000萬出售,誰要?曾經有媒體採訪過巴菲特,問他爲什麼要買入蘋果公司。巴菲特回答道,我並不關心下個季度或者明年的收入情況,因爲報表沒有辦法提供具體的數據,但你知道成千上百萬的用戶離不開它們,那款小小的手機幾乎就是世界上最有價值的資產。蘋果擁有數以億計的用戶,當手機每天都能幫助用戶做各種各樣的事情,這樣貨真價實的資產無異於一筆財富。實際上,如果按照現在的股價計算,五年時間巴菲特在蘋果上至少賺了7倍,其中還不包括每年的分紅。當下,蘋果股價繼續創出了歷史新高,市值超過了2.5萬億美元。當我們回頭來看十年前喬布斯的選擇,實際上沒有人比庫克更爲合適,儘管這十年很多人都質疑,蘋果失去了“靈魂”,其不僅產品價格越來越貴,產品設計也越來越像擠牙膏。2019年,在
市值突破2.5萬億美元,回購近4500億美元,iPhone13你會買嗎?
看
2.87K
回复
Comment
点赞
2
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
seraph2020
seraph2020
·
2021-08-02
Nice
From the Clinton Era: The Origin, Madness, and Burst of the Internet Bubble
不要成为真正相信泡沫或者增长可以永远持续而最后一个买入的人。
From the Clinton Era: The Origin, Madness, and Burst of the Internet Bubble
看
2.19K
回复
Comment
点赞
1
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
seraph2020
seraph2020
·
2021-02-03
……
視頻|“女股神”木頭姐如何看待WSB事件?
@小虎AV:
昨夜ARK ETF的創始人凱西·伍德接受雅虎財經節目採訪討論了她對Reddit、GameStop、潛在的債券泡沫和賣空者的看法。本期視頻精彩要點如下: Cathie Wood認爲千禧一代(90-00後)比嬰兒潮一代(80後)對股票更感興趣,這也是促成Reddit上形成 WSB效應的一些因素, 她一直都在關注WSB事件,在她看來WSB抱團做多現象是積極的,對股票市場和加密貨幣市場都有積極影響。 她認爲對衝基金在其中並不完全無辜,一個有趣的事情是對衝基金實際上是在協助和教唆這一現象。 WSB導致一些經營困難的公司債券價格提升,AMC是其中典型債券價格已經翻了三倍。 以ARK投資特斯拉爲例,此前埃隆·馬斯克曾嘗試將特斯拉私有化,導致股價大跌,2019年的時候特斯拉股價大跌,市場上看空的聲音很多,但是ARK堅定買入並長期看多特斯拉。後來2020年特斯拉股價大漲,ARK獲利頗豐,到今天,特斯拉依然是ARK最典型的一項投資。 她認爲這輪做空,除對衝基金以外,也有散戶投資者參與其中。現在WSB股票的波動已經到了一種離譜的情況,她會繼續關注下去看是什麼樣的收場。 WSB的最大受益方是銀行,而最終的參與者可能會損失慘重。 關於債券泡沫也值得大家關注,具體貌似沒有深入聊[吃瓜]後面是主持人聊天,沒啥意思,我就不翻了,大家看視頻吧,我繼續幹飯了[真香] 事先聲明:如果翻譯有錯,都是字幕軟件的鍋[正經]爲了提高準確率,這期我都是照着字幕軟件提取的英文翻譯成中字的[流淚]關於ARK Invest介紹:ARK 可以說是特斯拉最著名的多頭支持者之一,並且一直維持對特斯拉的最樂觀長期目標價。ARK Invest 也是極少數能考慮到特斯拉在自動駕駛、全自動駕駛套件,及埃隆·馬斯克 (Elon Musk) 計劃推出的共享出行服務 (Robotaxi net
視頻|“女股神”木頭姐如何看待WSB事件?
看
2.24K
回复
Comment
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
seraph2020
seraph2020
·
2021-01-29
?
空頭節節敗退,散戶即將迎來終局之戰
@三思期权:
本文首發於公衆號:三思期權 感謝大家對我們上一篇文章《散戶如何用期權拉爆百億美元對衝基金》的喜愛。我們雖然熬夜逐字逐句修改文章,推敲邏輯,最後被大家認可讓我們非常感動。感謝那些打賞,點贊,轉發,給我們留言鼓勵的讀者。另外,我們也收到了非常多的讀者留言,希望我們跟蹤事態的發展,那我們就繼續熬一個夜,爲大家奉上最新的事態發展。 昨夜GME的多空爭奪進入了白熱化。股價盤後從147離譜的跳漲到215,誰知道今天更是被被拉到375。短短三天之內這個本已經處於高位的股票又被拉昇了三倍。 週二GME股票的交易量達到200億美金,小小的一個線下游戲股交易額竟然超過了蘋果特斯拉!爲什麼今天漲幅這麼高,交易量這麼大?今天誰又賺錢了?誰又爆倉了? 1. 多頭增援 從昨天截稿之後,讓市場意想不到的是多頭竟然出現了重量級的支援。Chamath Palihapitiya 在推特上宣佈買入5萬張行權價爲$115的2月看漲合約之後,燃爆了原本已經非常亢奮的WSB。 這位Chamath是一位斯里蘭卡裔的美籍投資人,作爲臉書的早期員工,2021年離開時已經完成了人生小目標。隨後建立了自己的風投公司,做的也是風生水起,連中幾個獨角獸! 除此之外,他2012年就買3百萬美金的比特幣,隨後也重倉買入特斯拉,並在CNBC上公開懟當時就在做空的Jim Chanos(這位對衝基金Kynikos的創始人,在做空特斯拉5年後,平了股票空頭,慘敗收場,目前只買看跌期權,謹慎做空)。可見他對比特幣空頭,股票空頭早就有了深深的偏見。他重度參與多個SPAC(Special Purpose Acquisation Company 特殊目的收購公司)也是飽受爭議。 多了個有資歷,有聲望,有米的眼光獨到的成功投資人的
空頭節節敗退,散戶即將迎來終局之戰
看
2.35K
回复
Comment
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
seraph2020
seraph2020
·
2021-01-10
?
@Alan聊特斯拉:
Vincent 採訪濃縮版,上調目標價810,新高還能買?
Vincent 採訪濃縮版,上調目標價810,新高還能買?
看
2.43K
回复
Comment
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
seraph2020
seraph2020
·
2021-01-08
Nice
馬斯克:我的房子賣給了中國人 未來想葬在火星(上)
@走马财经:
近日,Business Insider雜誌母公司Axel Springer的首席執行官Mathias Döpfner與$特斯拉(TSLA)$ CEO埃隆·馬斯克(Elon Musk)會面,討論了爲什麼馬斯克的電動汽車公司會走在無人駕駛汽車革命的最前沿,以及他開啓太空探索的雄心壯志。由於老虎發文限制在10000字以內,本文全文16000字,所以只能分上下兩篇發出。這次採訪中,馬斯克談到了很多領域,觀點一如既往的犀利。*談新冠病毒,他認爲醫學的未來是mRNA,基本上你可以用mRNA治癒一切,它就像一個計算機程序,你可以對它進行編程以執行所需的任何操作。你實際上可以變成一隻蝴蝶。*談競爭,他說特斯拉的目標是加速可持續能源時代的到來,不在於建立護城河之類的東西。特斯拉將向其它公司提供自動駕駛技術許可,幫助它們做正確的事。*談收購,他說特斯拉不想發起敵意收購。如果其它公司找過來,那麼我們也會考慮。*談銷售目標,他說特斯拉未來10年的目標是每年賣出2000萬輛車。*談自動駕駛,他說我非常有信心特斯拉明年將達到L5級,100%。*談財富,他說我賣掉了幾乎所有的房產,只爲了更專注於實現人生目標,他租房住,有時睡工廠裏。*而他最重要的目標之一,就是幫助人類成爲跨星球物種,幫助人類從地球文明跨越到太空文明,所以SpaceX至關重要。以下是訪談全文實錄。Mathias Döpfner:睿智的德國政治家Wolfgang Schauble曾說:“如果我們的憲法中有一條底線,那就是人的尊嚴。這是神聖不可侵犯的。但這並不意味着我們可以避開死亡。”馬斯克:是的,每個人都會死。Döpfner:每個人都會死,但是尊嚴是應該被保護的,即使是在新冠時期。在被感染期間,你是否改變了對病毒的看法?
馬斯克:我的房子賣給了中國人 未來想葬在火星(上)
看
2.48K
回复
Comment
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Load more
Most Discussed
{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3567665939928011","uuid":"3567665939928011","gmtCreate":1604571916921,"gmtModify":1620018524140,"name":"seraph2020","pinyin":"seraph2020","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3391e117ae079b90cb54b08eec39043","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":109,"headSize":38,"tweetSize":88,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":3,"name":"书生虎","nameTw":"書生虎","represent":"努力向上","factor":"发布10条非转发主帖,其中5条获得他人回复或点赞","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":16,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-3","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":" Tiger Idol","description":"Join the tiger community for 1500 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/8b40ae7da5bf081a1c84df14bf9e6367","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f160eceddd7c284a8e1136557615cfad","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/11792805c468334a9b31c39f95a41c6a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.12.15","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"93.17%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},{"badgeId":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be-3","templateUuid":"972123088c9646f7b6091ae0662215be","name":"Legendary Trader","description":"Total number of securities or futures transactions reached 300","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/656db16598a0b8f21429e10d6c1cb033","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/03f10910d4dd9234f9b5702a3342193a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0c767e35268feb729d50d3fa9a386c5a","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.28","exceedPercentage":"93.58%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100},{"badgeId":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789-1","templateUuid":"7a9f168ff73447fe856ed6c938b61789","name":"Knowledgeable Investor","description":"Traded more than 10 stocks","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e74cc24115c4fbae6154ec1b1041bf47","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d48265cbfd97c57f9048db29f22227b0","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/76c6d6898b073c77e1c537ebe9ac1c57","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1102},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":5,"currentWearingBadge":{"badgeId":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03-3","templateUuid":"44212b71d0be4ec88898348dbe882e03","name":"President Tiger","description":"The transaction amount of the securities account reaches $1,000,000","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/fbeac6bb240db7da8b972e5183d050ba","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/436cdf80292b99f0a992e78750ac4e3a","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/506a259a7b456f037592c3b23c779599","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":1,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2023.07.14","exceedPercentage":"93.15%","individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1101},"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":94,"starInvestorFlag":true,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":1,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":18.1,"winRationPercentage":60.465116,"showRor":true,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":9069072230,"gmtCreate":1651211029360,"gmtModify":1676534871630,"author":{"id":"3567665939928011","authorId":"3567665939928011","name":"seraph2020","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3391e117ae079b90cb54b08eec39043","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3567665939928011","idStr":"3567665939928011"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9069072230","repostId":"1116937204","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2386,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9088764110,"gmtCreate":1650384532068,"gmtModify":1676534710930,"author":{"id":"3567665939928011","authorId":"3567665939928011","name":"seraph2020","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3391e117ae079b90cb54b08eec39043","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3567665939928011","idStr":"3567665939928011"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9088764110","repostId":"1111589482","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2895,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9080707107,"gmtCreate":1649913021942,"gmtModify":1676534606111,"author":{"id":"3567665939928011","authorId":"3567665939928011","name":"seraph2020","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3391e117ae079b90cb54b08eec39043","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3567665939928011","idStr":"3567665939928011"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good ","listText":"Good ","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9080707107","repostId":"2225584750","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2225584750","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1649855844,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2225584750?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-04-13 21:17","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Night Reading | Buffett's 40 sentences are highly recommended by Duan Yongping","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2225584750","media":"正和岛","summary":"巴菲特说,不管一家公司是大盘、小盘、中盘、还是超小盘,我们只考虑这么几点:这家公司的生意我们能不能看懂?这家公司的管理层我们喜不喜欢?这家公司的价格是否便宜?1998年,巴菲特在佛罗里达大学商学院做了","content":"<p><html><head></head><body><b>Buffett said that regardless of whether a company is large, small, medium or ultra-small, we only consider these points: Can we understand the business of this company? Do we like the management of this company? Is the price of this company cheap?</b>In 1998, Buffett gave a meaningful speech at the University of Florida Business School, which later became known as one of the most classic speeches of Buffett's life.<b>Duan Yongping strongly recommends the content of this speech, and it is said that he has read it 10 times.</b></p><p>Please be tricky when you ask questions. The harder the questions you ask, the more fun it will be. \"</p><p>It is worth mentioning that in the speech of nearly one and a half hours, Buffett himself did not speak long, but gave most of his time to the classmates at the scene, asking them to raise the questions that they were most concerned about.</p><p>\"What kind of company do you like?”</p><p>\"How much should you spend on a company?”</p><p>\"Can you tell us about the mistakes you made in business?”</p><p>Sharp questions did not stumble this \"stock god\". He not only answered the students' questions with humor, but also analyzed his stock selection criteria, portfolio construction and thinking mode through the questions.</p><p><b>Huang Zheng said before, \"I found that what Buffett said was actually very simple, and even my mother could understand it. Common sense is obvious and easy to understand, but we are blinded by the prejudices formed by our growth and learning and the demands of personal interests.\"</b></p><p>As Huang Zheng said, Buffett is extremely good at telling you important investment philosophies in a very easy-to-understand metaphor. This was the case twenty years ago. Vivid cases and visual expressions made this speech a classic among classics. It is still very enlightening to revisit it today.</p><p>The original speech is long,<b>We have sorted out 40 essence contents and compiled them into articles,</b>It involves investment ideas, business judgments and hopes for young people. I believe it will inspire you after reading it.</p><p>01</p><p>Don't do anything outside the margin of safety</p><p>01. Suppose you hand me a gun with 1,000 magazines, 1 million magazines, and only one magazine has a bullet in it, and you say, \"Point the gun at your temple and pull the trigger. How much do you want?\" I won't do it. No matter how much you pay me, I won't do it.</p><p>If I win, I don't need that money; If I lose, the result goes without saying. I don't want to do such things at all, but in the financial field, people often do such things without going through their brains.</p><p>02. Suppose you have $100 million at the beginning of the year. If you are not leveraged, you can earn 10%. The success rate of leverage is 99%, and you can earn 20%. At the end of the year, you have $110 million or $120 million. Is there any difference? It doesn't make a difference.</p><p>If you die at the end of the year, the person who wrote the obituary may have made a clerical mistake. Although you have 120 million, he wrote 110 million.</p><p>What's the use of the extra money? No use at all. It doesn't work for you, your family, anyone else.</p><p>03. We basically haven't borrowed any money. Of course, our insurance company has floating money, but I haven't borrowed any money at all.</p><p>I don't borrow money when I only have 10,000 yuan. Is it different not to borrow money? I am also very happy to make investments when I have little money.</p><p>I don't care at all if I have 10,000, 100,000, or 1 million. Unless there is an emergency, such as serious illness and urgent need of money.</p><p>04. If you have 1 yuan now and think that when you have 2 yuan in the future, you can live happier than you are now, you may be wrong. Don't think that earning 10 or 20 times can solve all the problems in your life. Such an idea can easily lead you to the ditch.</p><p>Borrowing money when you shouldn't, or eager for quick success, opportunistic, and doing things you shouldn't do, there will be no place to buy regret medicine in the future.</p><p>02</p><p>Business that can be understood is good business</p><p>05. Henry Kaufman, an American economist, famously said:</p><p>\"There are two kinds of people who are bankrupt, one who knows nothing and the other who knows everything.\"</p><p>I hope everyone can take this as a warning.</p><p>06. I like businesses I can understand. I use this filter, and 90% of companies are filtered out.</p><p>Some things you can't do knowing you don't understand.</p><p>07. I don't like easy business. Business is easy and will attract competitors. I like business with moats.</p><p>I wish to have a priceless castle, the duke guarding it with both talent and political integrity, and the castle has a wide moat around it.</p><p>I have often responded to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BRK.A\">Berkshire</a>Widen the moat, said the manager of the subsidiary. Throw crocodiles and sharks into the moat to keep competitors out.</p><p>It depends on service, product quality, cost, and sometimes patents or place of business. That's the kind of business I'm looking for.</p><p>Where can I find such a business? I look for good business in those simple products.</p><p>In fact, it is easy to understand that the current economic situation is good, and the management has both ability and political integrity. Such businesses, I can roughly see what they will be like in ten years. Some businesses, I can't see what will happen in ten years, I don't buy them.</p><p>Like<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ORCL\">Oracle</a>Lotus,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>These companies, I can't figure out what their moat will be in ten years.</p><p>Gates is the best business wizard I've ever met,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>Also has a huge lead, but I really don't know what Microsoft will be in ten years, or exactly what Microsoft's competitors will be in ten years.</p><p>However, I know what the gum business will be like in ten years, and no matter how much the internet develops, it will not change our gum-chewing habits, as if nothing can. More new varieties of gum will surely emerge, but will the white and yellow arrows disappear? It won't be.</p><p>I imagine for myself, if I had $1 billion, could I hurt this company? Give me $10 billion and let me work globally and<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/KO\">Coca Cola</a>Competition, I can hurt<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/KO\">Coca Cola</a>Is it? I couldn't do it. Such business is good business.</p><p>08. No matter what time, know what you are doing, so that you can make a good investment. We must understand the business. Some businesses are something we can understand, but not all businesses we can understand.</p><p>09. We don't care whether a company is large-cap, small-cap, medium-cap, or ultra-small-cap. We only consider the following points:</p><p>Can we understand the business of this company? Do we like the management of this company? Is the price of this company cheap?</p><p>03</p><p>Buying stocks is buying companies</p><p>Market decline is a good opportunity</p><p>10. If none of the companies you invest in make money on their own, it will be difficult for you to make money.</p><p>11. After people buy stocks, they stare at the stock price early the next morning, and see that the stock price determines whether their investment is doing well or not. They are confused.</p><p>Buying stocks is buying companies, which is the most basic truth Graham taught me.</p><p>Remember, you are not buying shares, but part ownership of the company. As long as the company's business is good, and the price you buy is not ridiculously high, and your income is not bad, investing in stocks is as simple as that.</p><p>12. I prefer to see the market fall. When it falls sharply, it is easier to buy good goods and use money well. To invest in stocks, this is a truth that you must learn first.</p><p>13. You must have a reason for what you want to buy. If you can't give a reason, don't buy it.</p><p>14. Some people regard buying stocks as watching horse racing, which doesn't matter, but if you are investing, investment is to invest money in it to make sure that you can recover it at a suitable rate of return in the future.</p><p>15. What we think about is not how to get a super high rate of return, but always keeping in mind that we never lose money.</p><p>16. Most<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/300785\">Worth buying</a>Companies are those that you think are expensive in terms of numbers and are reluctant to buy, but still want to buy them.</p><p>04</p><p>Hold the Circle of Competence</p><p>Identify a good business</p><p>17. If you can't understand a business at a glance, you still can't understand it after another month or two.</p><p>To understand a business, you must have enough background knowledge, and you must know what you know and what you don't know. This is the key. This is what I often mean by the circle of competence. You should be clear about your circle of competence.</p><p>18. Everyone has their own circle of competence. What matters is not how big the circle of competence is, but staying within the circle of competence.</p><p>If there are thousands of companies in the motherboard, your circle of competence only covers 30 of them, as long as you know which 30 are, that's fine.</p><p>19. As long as it's good business, nothing else matters. As long as it's good business, I don't care about the big or small things, and I don't think about how this year and next year will be.</p><p>Good business, you can see how it will be in the future, but you don't know when.</p><p>When you look at a business, you are focused on thinking about what will happen in the future. Don't get too entangled about when. It doesn't matter how the future of the business can be seen through and when it is.</p><p>20. For my partner Charlie Munger and I, the biggest mistake we ever made was not doing what was wrong, but not doing what was supposed to be done.</p><p>In the midst of these mistakes, we knew the business well and should have acted, but somehow we hesitated and hesitated and did nothing.</p><p>21. I do not study macro issues. The most important thing in investing is to figure out what is important and knowable. If a thing is unimportant and unknowable, leave it alone.</p><p>22. The routine of general consulting organizations is like this. First, they pull their economists out and slip around twice, talk about some big macro patterns, and then analyze them from top to bottom. We think those are nonsense.</p><p>23. When we decide whether to buy a company or not, we never rely on our feelings about macro issues. We don't look at forecasts about interest rates or company earnings, it's useless to look at them.</p><p>05</p><p>Be a friend of time</p><p>Make money by not tossing</p><p>24. Find a good investment opportunity a year, and then hold it until its full potential is unlocked.</p><p>In an environment where people are shouting quotes back and forth every five minutes, in an environment where others are always cramming reports in front of you, it's hard to hold on. Wall Street makes money by tossing, and you make money by not tossing.</p><p>25. If you all here traded your portfolios with each other every day, everyone would end up bankrupt, and all the money would end up in the pockets of the middlemen.</p><p>To put it another way, you both hold a portfolio of ordinary companies, and you both remain motionless for 50 years. In the end, you will both be rich and your brokerage will go bankrupt. Brokerage A doctor like this, the more times he asks you to change your dressing, the more he makes.</p><p>If he gives you a medicine that will cure your illness, he can only make a deal, a deal, and then it will be gone. If he can convince you that changing to take various medicines every day is good for your health, which is good for him and good for the drug seller, you will lose a lot of money. Your health will not get better, and you will lose money.</p><p>26. Keep away from any environment that stimulates you to mess around.</p><p>27. No matter which company we buy, we don't set a price target when we buy.</p><p>For example, we bought it at 30, never thought we would go up to 40, 50, 60 or 100 and sell it, never like that.</p><p>We hope that the companies we buy are bullish now and will be as bullish in five years.</p><p>28. The right way to think about a company is whether the company can be more and more profitable in the long run? If the answer is yes, you don't need to ask any other questions.</p><p>29. Time is the friend of good business and the enemy of bad business.</p><p>If you hold a bad business for a long time, even if you buy it cheaply, you can only make bad profits in the end. If you hold a good business for a long time, even if you buy it more expensive, you will still make excellent profits as long as you hold it for a long time.</p><p>06</p><p>Diversified business</p><p>Should not exceed 6</p><p>30. If you are not a professional investor and do not pursue the goal of achieving excess returns by managing funds, I think you should be highly diversified.</p><p>31. If you can read businesses, you should have no more than six businesses.</p><p>If you can find six good businesses, it will be enough to spread out, no more, and you can make a lot of money.</p><p>I can guarantee that if you don't invest your money in the business you are most optimistic about, but instead go into the seventh business, you will definitely fall into the ditch. Few people make their fortune on the seventh best idea, and many people make their fortune on the best idea.</p><p>32. If you asked me, if I put all my money into a company for twenty years, I would choose<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PG\">P&G</a>Coca-Cola, actually<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PG\">P&G</a>The product line is more diversified, but in comparison, I think Coca-Cola's certainty is higher than P&G's.</p><p>Procter & Gamble can be selected in the top 5% of my most optimistic companies, and Procter & Gamble will not be defeated by its competitors. However, in the next 20 or 30 years, between Procter & Gamble and Coca-Cola, I am more optimistic about Coca-Cola's sales growth potential and pricing power.</p><p>33. I still prefer a business where the product itself sells well.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCD\">McDonald's</a>There have been more and more promotions in recent years, and it has increasingly relied on promotions rather than on the products themselves selling well.</p><p>In contrast, I prefer Gillette, people buy the Front Speed 3 because they like the Front Speed 3 product itself and don't buy it just to get any giveaway.</p><p>Every night, think about the one or two hundred million men whose beards are growing, and when you sleep, the men's beards are growing all the time, and you can sleep soundly. Think again, women all have two legs, which is even better. This method is much more effective than counting sheep. If you want to find this kind of business.</p><p>07</p><p>Some advice for young people</p><p>34. The shackles of habit, at first, are too light to detect, but later they are too heavy to get rid of.</p><p>35. If someone turns me off, but I can make $100 million with him, I will flatly refuse, or how is it different from getting married for money?</p><p>No matter when, you can't get married for money, and if you are already rich, you can't do this.</p><p>36. I have a job that I love, and I loved it when I thought earning $1,000 was a lot of money.</p><p>Students, do the jobs you like. If you always do the jobs you don't like, just to make the work experience on your resume more beautiful, then you are really confused.</p><p>37. You should do whatever work you want to do after your wealth is free. Such a job is the ideal job.</p><p>38. Does it feel a bit like saving your sex life when you are young and saving it until you are older?</p><p>Sooner or later, you should both start doing what you really want to do.</p><p>39. We never think about the past. We feel that there is so much to look forward to in the future, so why worry about the past.</p><p>Don't dwell on the past, it's useless to dwell, life can only look forward.</p><p>40. Do what you like all your life and make friends with people you like.</p><p></body></html></p>","source":"zhenghedao","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Night Reading | Buffett's 40 sentences are highly recommended by Duan Yongping</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNight Reading | Buffett's 40 sentences are highly recommended by Duan Yongping\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">正和岛</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2022-04-13 21:17</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body><b>Buffett said that regardless of whether a company is large, small, medium or ultra-small, we only consider these points: Can we understand the business of this company? Do we like the management of this company? Is the price of this company cheap?</b>In 1998, Buffett gave a meaningful speech at the University of Florida Business School, which later became known as one of the most classic speeches of Buffett's life.<b>Duan Yongping strongly recommends the content of this speech, and it is said that he has read it 10 times.</b></p><p>Please be tricky when you ask questions. The harder the questions you ask, the more fun it will be. \"</p><p>It is worth mentioning that in the speech of nearly one and a half hours, Buffett himself did not speak long, but gave most of his time to the classmates at the scene, asking them to raise the questions that they were most concerned about.</p><p>\"What kind of company do you like?”</p><p>\"How much should you spend on a company?”</p><p>\"Can you tell us about the mistakes you made in business?”</p><p>Sharp questions did not stumble this \"stock god\". He not only answered the students' questions with humor, but also analyzed his stock selection criteria, portfolio construction and thinking mode through the questions.</p><p><b>Huang Zheng said before, \"I found that what Buffett said was actually very simple, and even my mother could understand it. Common sense is obvious and easy to understand, but we are blinded by the prejudices formed by our growth and learning and the demands of personal interests.\"</b></p><p>As Huang Zheng said, Buffett is extremely good at telling you important investment philosophies in a very easy-to-understand metaphor. This was the case twenty years ago. Vivid cases and visual expressions made this speech a classic among classics. It is still very enlightening to revisit it today.</p><p>The original speech is long,<b>We have sorted out 40 essence contents and compiled them into articles,</b>It involves investment ideas, business judgments and hopes for young people. I believe it will inspire you after reading it.</p><p>01</p><p>Don't do anything outside the margin of safety</p><p>01. Suppose you hand me a gun with 1,000 magazines, 1 million magazines, and only one magazine has a bullet in it, and you say, \"Point the gun at your temple and pull the trigger. How much do you want?\" I won't do it. No matter how much you pay me, I won't do it.</p><p>If I win, I don't need that money; If I lose, the result goes without saying. I don't want to do such things at all, but in the financial field, people often do such things without going through their brains.</p><p>02. Suppose you have $100 million at the beginning of the year. If you are not leveraged, you can earn 10%. The success rate of leverage is 99%, and you can earn 20%. At the end of the year, you have $110 million or $120 million. Is there any difference? It doesn't make a difference.</p><p>If you die at the end of the year, the person who wrote the obituary may have made a clerical mistake. Although you have 120 million, he wrote 110 million.</p><p>What's the use of the extra money? No use at all. It doesn't work for you, your family, anyone else.</p><p>03. We basically haven't borrowed any money. Of course, our insurance company has floating money, but I haven't borrowed any money at all.</p><p>I don't borrow money when I only have 10,000 yuan. Is it different not to borrow money? I am also very happy to make investments when I have little money.</p><p>I don't care at all if I have 10,000, 100,000, or 1 million. Unless there is an emergency, such as serious illness and urgent need of money.</p><p>04. If you have 1 yuan now and think that when you have 2 yuan in the future, you can live happier than you are now, you may be wrong. Don't think that earning 10 or 20 times can solve all the problems in your life. Such an idea can easily lead you to the ditch.</p><p>Borrowing money when you shouldn't, or eager for quick success, opportunistic, and doing things you shouldn't do, there will be no place to buy regret medicine in the future.</p><p>02</p><p>Business that can be understood is good business</p><p>05. Henry Kaufman, an American economist, famously said:</p><p>\"There are two kinds of people who are bankrupt, one who knows nothing and the other who knows everything.\"</p><p>I hope everyone can take this as a warning.</p><p>06. I like businesses I can understand. I use this filter, and 90% of companies are filtered out.</p><p>Some things you can't do knowing you don't understand.</p><p>07. I don't like easy business. Business is easy and will attract competitors. I like business with moats.</p><p>I wish to have a priceless castle, the duke guarding it with both talent and political integrity, and the castle has a wide moat around it.</p><p>I have often responded to<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/BRK.A\">Berkshire</a>Widen the moat, said the manager of the subsidiary. Throw crocodiles and sharks into the moat to keep competitors out.</p><p>It depends on service, product quality, cost, and sometimes patents or place of business. That's the kind of business I'm looking for.</p><p>Where can I find such a business? I look for good business in those simple products.</p><p>In fact, it is easy to understand that the current economic situation is good, and the management has both ability and political integrity. Such businesses, I can roughly see what they will be like in ten years. Some businesses, I can't see what will happen in ten years, I don't buy them.</p><p>Like<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/ORCL\">Oracle</a>Lotus,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>These companies, I can't figure out what their moat will be in ten years.</p><p>Gates is the best business wizard I've ever met,<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MSFT\">Microsoft</a>Also has a huge lead, but I really don't know what Microsoft will be in ten years, or exactly what Microsoft's competitors will be in ten years.</p><p>However, I know what the gum business will be like in ten years, and no matter how much the internet develops, it will not change our gum-chewing habits, as if nothing can. More new varieties of gum will surely emerge, but will the white and yellow arrows disappear? It won't be.</p><p>I imagine for myself, if I had $1 billion, could I hurt this company? Give me $10 billion and let me work globally and<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/KO\">Coca Cola</a>Competition, I can hurt<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/KO\">Coca Cola</a>Is it? I couldn't do it. Such business is good business.</p><p>08. No matter what time, know what you are doing, so that you can make a good investment. We must understand the business. Some businesses are something we can understand, but not all businesses we can understand.</p><p>09. We don't care whether a company is large-cap, small-cap, medium-cap, or ultra-small-cap. We only consider the following points:</p><p>Can we understand the business of this company? Do we like the management of this company? Is the price of this company cheap?</p><p>03</p><p>Buying stocks is buying companies</p><p>Market decline is a good opportunity</p><p>10. If none of the companies you invest in make money on their own, it will be difficult for you to make money.</p><p>11. After people buy stocks, they stare at the stock price early the next morning, and see that the stock price determines whether their investment is doing well or not. They are confused.</p><p>Buying stocks is buying companies, which is the most basic truth Graham taught me.</p><p>Remember, you are not buying shares, but part ownership of the company. As long as the company's business is good, and the price you buy is not ridiculously high, and your income is not bad, investing in stocks is as simple as that.</p><p>12. I prefer to see the market fall. When it falls sharply, it is easier to buy good goods and use money well. To invest in stocks, this is a truth that you must learn first.</p><p>13. You must have a reason for what you want to buy. If you can't give a reason, don't buy it.</p><p>14. Some people regard buying stocks as watching horse racing, which doesn't matter, but if you are investing, investment is to invest money in it to make sure that you can recover it at a suitable rate of return in the future.</p><p>15. What we think about is not how to get a super high rate of return, but always keeping in mind that we never lose money.</p><p>16. Most<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/300785\">Worth buying</a>Companies are those that you think are expensive in terms of numbers and are reluctant to buy, but still want to buy them.</p><p>04</p><p>Hold the Circle of Competence</p><p>Identify a good business</p><p>17. If you can't understand a business at a glance, you still can't understand it after another month or two.</p><p>To understand a business, you must have enough background knowledge, and you must know what you know and what you don't know. This is the key. This is what I often mean by the circle of competence. You should be clear about your circle of competence.</p><p>18. Everyone has their own circle of competence. What matters is not how big the circle of competence is, but staying within the circle of competence.</p><p>If there are thousands of companies in the motherboard, your circle of competence only covers 30 of them, as long as you know which 30 are, that's fine.</p><p>19. As long as it's good business, nothing else matters. As long as it's good business, I don't care about the big or small things, and I don't think about how this year and next year will be.</p><p>Good business, you can see how it will be in the future, but you don't know when.</p><p>When you look at a business, you are focused on thinking about what will happen in the future. Don't get too entangled about when. It doesn't matter how the future of the business can be seen through and when it is.</p><p>20. For my partner Charlie Munger and I, the biggest mistake we ever made was not doing what was wrong, but not doing what was supposed to be done.</p><p>In the midst of these mistakes, we knew the business well and should have acted, but somehow we hesitated and hesitated and did nothing.</p><p>21. I do not study macro issues. The most important thing in investing is to figure out what is important and knowable. If a thing is unimportant and unknowable, leave it alone.</p><p>22. The routine of general consulting organizations is like this. First, they pull their economists out and slip around twice, talk about some big macro patterns, and then analyze them from top to bottom. We think those are nonsense.</p><p>23. When we decide whether to buy a company or not, we never rely on our feelings about macro issues. We don't look at forecasts about interest rates or company earnings, it's useless to look at them.</p><p>05</p><p>Be a friend of time</p><p>Make money by not tossing</p><p>24. Find a good investment opportunity a year, and then hold it until its full potential is unlocked.</p><p>In an environment where people are shouting quotes back and forth every five minutes, in an environment where others are always cramming reports in front of you, it's hard to hold on. Wall Street makes money by tossing, and you make money by not tossing.</p><p>25. If you all here traded your portfolios with each other every day, everyone would end up bankrupt, and all the money would end up in the pockets of the middlemen.</p><p>To put it another way, you both hold a portfolio of ordinary companies, and you both remain motionless for 50 years. In the end, you will both be rich and your brokerage will go bankrupt. Brokerage A doctor like this, the more times he asks you to change your dressing, the more he makes.</p><p>If he gives you a medicine that will cure your illness, he can only make a deal, a deal, and then it will be gone. If he can convince you that changing to take various medicines every day is good for your health, which is good for him and good for the drug seller, you will lose a lot of money. Your health will not get better, and you will lose money.</p><p>26. Keep away from any environment that stimulates you to mess around.</p><p>27. No matter which company we buy, we don't set a price target when we buy.</p><p>For example, we bought it at 30, never thought we would go up to 40, 50, 60 or 100 and sell it, never like that.</p><p>We hope that the companies we buy are bullish now and will be as bullish in five years.</p><p>28. The right way to think about a company is whether the company can be more and more profitable in the long run? If the answer is yes, you don't need to ask any other questions.</p><p>29. Time is the friend of good business and the enemy of bad business.</p><p>If you hold a bad business for a long time, even if you buy it cheaply, you can only make bad profits in the end. If you hold a good business for a long time, even if you buy it more expensive, you will still make excellent profits as long as you hold it for a long time.</p><p>06</p><p>Diversified business</p><p>Should not exceed 6</p><p>30. If you are not a professional investor and do not pursue the goal of achieving excess returns by managing funds, I think you should be highly diversified.</p><p>31. If you can read businesses, you should have no more than six businesses.</p><p>If you can find six good businesses, it will be enough to spread out, no more, and you can make a lot of money.</p><p>I can guarantee that if you don't invest your money in the business you are most optimistic about, but instead go into the seventh business, you will definitely fall into the ditch. Few people make their fortune on the seventh best idea, and many people make their fortune on the best idea.</p><p>32. If you asked me, if I put all my money into a company for twenty years, I would choose<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PG\">P&G</a>Coca-Cola, actually<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PG\">P&G</a>The product line is more diversified, but in comparison, I think Coca-Cola's certainty is higher than P&G's.</p><p>Procter & Gamble can be selected in the top 5% of my most optimistic companies, and Procter & Gamble will not be defeated by its competitors. However, in the next 20 or 30 years, between Procter & Gamble and Coca-Cola, I am more optimistic about Coca-Cola's sales growth potential and pricing power.</p><p>33. I still prefer a business where the product itself sells well.</p><p><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/MCD\">McDonald's</a>There have been more and more promotions in recent years, and it has increasingly relied on promotions rather than on the products themselves selling well.</p><p>In contrast, I prefer Gillette, people buy the Front Speed 3 because they like the Front Speed 3 product itself and don't buy it just to get any giveaway.</p><p>Every night, think about the one or two hundred million men whose beards are growing, and when you sleep, the men's beards are growing all the time, and you can sleep soundly. Think again, women all have two legs, which is even better. This method is much more effective than counting sheep. If you want to find this kind of business.</p><p>07</p><p>Some advice for young people</p><p>34. The shackles of habit, at first, are too light to detect, but later they are too heavy to get rid of.</p><p>35. If someone turns me off, but I can make $100 million with him, I will flatly refuse, or how is it different from getting married for money?</p><p>No matter when, you can't get married for money, and if you are already rich, you can't do this.</p><p>36. I have a job that I love, and I loved it when I thought earning $1,000 was a lot of money.</p><p>Students, do the jobs you like. If you always do the jobs you don't like, just to make the work experience on your resume more beautiful, then you are really confused.</p><p>37. You should do whatever work you want to do after your wealth is free. Such a job is the ideal job.</p><p>38. Does it feel a bit like saving your sex life when you are young and saving it until you are older?</p><p>Sooner or later, you should both start doing what you really want to do.</p><p>39. We never think about the past. We feel that there is so much to look forward to in the future, so why worry about the past.</p><p>Don't dwell on the past, it's useless to dwell, life can only look forward.</p><p>40. Do what you like all your life and make friends with people you like.</p><p></body></html></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source:<a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/_If2Jbd9zIFKl-lKJJqdaA\">正和岛</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ee8356647b06585ac937a0f45e6aeb17","relate_stocks":{"BK4581":"高盛持仓","BK4533":"AQR资本管理(全球第二大对冲基金)","BRK.A":"伯克希尔","BK4176":"多领域控股","BRK.B":"伯克希尔B","BK4550":"红杉资本持仓","BK4534":"瑞士信贷持仓"},"source_url":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/_If2Jbd9zIFKl-lKJJqdaA","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2225584750","content_text":"巴菲特说,不管一家公司是大盘、小盘、中盘、还是超小盘,我们只考虑这么几点:这家公司的生意我们能不能看懂?这家公司的管理层我们喜不喜欢?这家公司的价格是否便宜?1998年,巴菲特在佛罗里达大学商学院做了一场超有内涵的演讲,这次演讲后来被称为是巴菲特一生中最经典的演讲,没有之一。段永平强烈推荐这次的演讲内容,据说已经看了10遍。请各位提问时一定要刁钻,你们问的问题越难,才越好玩。”值得一提的是,近一个半小时的演讲中,巴菲特本人并没有长篇大论,而是把大部分时间交给了现场的同学,让他们提出自己最为关心的问题。“您喜欢什么样的公司?”“到底该花多少钱买一家公司?”“能否讲讲您在商业中犯的错误?”一个个犀利的问题并没有难倒这位“股神”,他既幽默风趣的回答了学生们的提问,又借着问题深入剖析了自己的选股标准、组合构建和思维方式。黄峥此前说过,“我发现巴菲特讲的东西其实特别简单,连我母亲都能听懂。常识显而易见、容易理解,但我们因为成长、学习形成的偏见和个人利益的诉求蒙蔽了我们。”如黄峥所言,巴菲特极其擅长把重要的投资哲理用非常通俗易懂的比喻来告诉大家,二十年前便是如此,一个个生动的案例加上形象化的表达,让这场演讲成为经典中的经典,今天重温下来,依然极具启迪意义。演讲原文较长,我们从中整理了40条精华内容摘编成文,涉及投资理念、生意判断以及对年轻人的希冀,相信读后一定会对你有所启发。01别做安全边际以外的事01. 假设你递给我一把枪,里面有1000个弹仓、100万个弹仓,其中只有一个弹仓里有一颗子弹,你说:“把枪对准你的太阳穴,扣一下扳机,你要多少钱?”我不干。你给我多少钱,我都不干。要是我赢了,我不需要那些钱;要是我输了,结果不用说了。这样的事,我一点都不想做,但是在金融领域,人们经常做这样的事,都不经过大脑。02. 假设年初你有1亿美元,如果不上杠杆,能赚10%,上杠杆的成功率是99%,能赚20%,年末时你有1.1亿美元,还是1.2亿美元,有区别吗?没一点区别。要是年末你死了,写讣告的人可能有个笔误,虽然你有1.2亿,但他写成了1.1亿。多赚的钱有什么用?一点用没有。对你、对你的家人,对别人,都没用。03. 我们基本上没借过钱,当然我们的保险公司里有浮存金,但是我压根没借过钱。我只有1万块钱的时候都不借钱,不借钱不一样吗?我钱少的时候做投资也很开心。我根本不在乎我到底是有1万、10万,还是100万。除非遇上了急事,比如生了大病急需用钱。04. 如果你现在有1块钱,以为将来有2块钱的时候,自己能比现在过得更幸福,你可能想错了,别以为赚10倍或20倍能解决生活中的所有问题,这样的想法很容易把你带到沟里去。在不该借钱的时候借钱,或者急功近利、投机取巧,做自己不该做的事,将来都没地方买后悔药。02能看懂的生意才是好生意05. 美国经济学家亨利·考夫曼有这么一句名言:“破产的有两种人,一种是什么都不知道的,一种是什么都知道的。”希望大家能引以为戒。06. 我喜欢我能看懂的生意,我用这一条筛选,90%的公司都被过滤掉了。有些东西明知道自己不懂,就不能做。07. 我不喜欢很容易的生意,生意很容易,会招来竞争对手,我喜欢有护城河的生意。我希望拥有一座价值连城的城堡,守护城堡的公爵德才兼备,而且这座城堡周围有宽广的护城河。我经常对伯克希尔子公司的管理者说,加宽护城河。往护城河里扔鳄鱼、鲨鱼,把竞争对手挡在外面。这要靠服务、靠产品质量、靠成本,有时候要靠专利或营业地点。我要找的就是这样的生意。在哪能找到这样的生意呢?我从那些简单的产品里寻找好生意。其实很容易理解,当前的经济状况良好,管理层德才兼备,这样的生意,我能大概看出来它们十年后会怎样。有的生意,我看不出来十年后会怎样,我不买。像甲骨文、莲花、微软这些公司,我就搞不懂它们的护城河十年之后会怎样。盖茨是我遇到过的最优秀的商业奇才,微软也拥有巨大的领先优势,但我真不知道微软十年后会怎样,也无法确切地知道微软的竞争对手十年后会怎样。不过,我知道口香糖生意十年后会怎样,互联网再怎么发展,都不会改变我们嚼口香糖的习惯,好像没什么能改变我们嚼口香糖的习惯。肯定会有更多新品种的口香糖出现,但白箭和黄箭会消失吗?不会。我自己设想,要是我有10亿美元,能伤着这家公司吗?给我100亿美元,让我在全球和可口可乐竞争,我能伤着可口可乐吗?我做不到。这样的生意是好生意。08. 无论什么时候,都要知道自己在做什么,这样才能做好投资。必须把生意看懂了,有的生意是我们能看懂的,但不是所有生意我们都能看懂。09. 我们不管一家公司是大盘、小盘、中盘、还是超小盘,我们只考虑这么几点:这家公司的生意我们能不能看懂?这家公司的管理层我们喜不喜欢?这家公司的价格是否便宜?03买股票就是买公司市场下跌是好机会10. 如果你投资的公司本身都不赚钱,你也很难赚钱。11. 人们买完股票后,第二天一早就盯着股价,看股价决定自己的投资做得好不好,糊涂到家了。买股票就是买公司,这是格雷厄姆教给我的最基本的道理。记住,你买的不是股票,而是公司的一部分所有权。只要公司生意好,而且你买的价格不是高得离谱,你的收益也差不了,投资股票就这么简单。12. 我更愿意看到市场下跌,大跌的时候更容易买到好货,更容易把钱用好,要投资股票,这是你必须首先学会的一个道理。13. 自己要买什么,一定要有个理由,说不出来理由的,别买。14. 有的人把买股票当成看赛马,那无所谓了,但如果你是在投资的话,投资是把资金投进去,确定将来能以合适的收益率收回资金。15. 我们想的不是怎么获得超高的回报率,而是始终牢记永远不亏钱。16. 最值得买的公司,是那些你觉得从数字上看很贵,舍不得买,但还是很想买的公司。04守住能力圈认定好生意17. 一门生意,要是你不能一眼看懂,再花一两个月的时间,你还是看不懂。要看懂一门生意,必须有足够的背景知识才行,而且要清楚自己知道什么,不知道什么,这是关键。我常说的能力圈就是这个意思,要清楚自己的能力圈。18. 每个人都有自己的能力圈,重要的不是能力圈有多大,而是待在能力圈的范围之内。如果主板中有几千家公司,你的能力圈只涵盖其中的 30 家,只要你清楚是哪30家,就可以了。19. 只要是好生意,别的什么东西都不重要。只要是好生意,我就不管那些大事小事,也不考虑今年明年如何之类的问题。好生意,你能看出来它将来会怎样,但是不知道会是什么时候。看一个生意,你就一门心思琢磨它将来会怎么样,别太纠结什么时候。把生意的将来能怎么样看透了,到底是什么时候,就没多大关系了。20. 对于我和我的合伙人查理·芒格来说,我们犯过的最大的错误不是做错了什么,而是该做的没做。在这些错误中,我们对生意很了解,本来应该行动,但不知道怎么了,我们就在那犹豫来犹豫去,什么都没做。21. 我不研究宏观问题,投资中最紧要的是弄清什么事是重要的、可知的。如果一件事是不重要的、不可知的,那就别管了。22. 一般的咨询机构的套路是这样的,先把他们的经济学家拉出来溜两圈,讲一些大的宏观格局,然后自上而下地分析,我们觉得那些都是胡扯。23. 我们在决定买不买一家公司时,从来不把我们对宏观问题的感觉作为依据。我们不看关于利率或公司盈利的预测,看了没用。05做时间的朋友靠不折腾赚钱24. 一年找到一个好的投资机会,然后一直持有,等待它的潜力充分释放出来。在一个人们每五分钟就来回喊报价的环境里,在一个别人总把各种报告塞到你面前的环境里,很难做到持有不动。华尔街靠折腾赚钱,你靠不折腾赚钱。25. 要是在座的各位每天都相互交易自己的投资组合,所有人最后都会破产,所有的钱最后都会进到中间商的口袋里。换个做法,你们都持有一般公司组成的投资组合,50年里你们都一动不动,最后你们都会很有钱,你们的券商会破产。券商像这样一个医生,他让你换药的次数越多,他赚的越多。他要是给你一种药,把你的病根治了,他只能做成一笔买卖,一笔交易,然后就没了。如果他能让你相信每天换各种药吃对健康有益,这对他有好处,对卖药的有好处,你会亏很多钱。你的身体好不了,还会破财。26. 任何刺激你瞎折腾的环境,都要远离。27. 不管买哪家公司,我们买的时候都不设定价格目标。例如,我们是30买的,从没想过涨到40、50、60或100就卖了,从来没这样过。我们希望自己买入的公司,现在看好,五年后一样看好。28. 看一家公司正确的思维方式是,长期来看,这家公司是否能越来越赚钱?如果答案是能,别的问题都用不着问了。29. 时间是好生意的朋友,烂生意的敌人。如果长期持有一个烂生意,就算买得再便宜,最后也只能取得很烂的收益。如果长期持有好生意,就算买得贵了一些,只要长期持有,还是会取得出色的收益。06分散投资的生意不应超过6个30. 如果不是职业投资者,不追求通过管理资金实现超额收益率的目标,我觉得应该高度分散投资。31. 要是你真能看懂生意,你拥有的生意不应该超过六个。要是你能找到六个好生意,就已经足够分散了,用不着再分散了,而且你能赚很多钱。我敢保证,你不把钱投到你最看好的那个生意,而是再去做第七个生意,肯定会掉到沟里。靠第七个最好的主意发家的人很少,靠最好的主意发家的人很多。32. 要是你问我,我要是把我的所有资金都投入到一家公司,二十年不动,我会选宝洁还是可口可乐,其实宝洁的产品线更多元化,但是比较起来,我认为可口可乐的确定性比宝洁的确定性高。宝洁可以入选我最看好的公司中的前5%,宝洁不会被竞争对手打垮,但是从将来二三十年看,在宝洁和可可口乐之间,我更看好可口可乐的销量增长潜力和定价权。33. 我还是更喜欢产品本身卖得好的生意。麦当劳这几年的促销活动越来越多,它越来越依赖促销,而不是靠产品本身卖得好。相比之下,我更喜欢吉列,人们买锋速3是因为他们喜欢锋速3这个产品本身,不是为了得到什么赠品才买的。每天晚上,想想一两亿男人的胡子都在长,你睡觉的时候,男人们的胡子一直在长,你就能睡得很踏实。再想想,女人们都有两条腿,这更好了。这个方法比数绵羊管用多了,要找就找这样的生意。07给年轻人的几点建议34. 习惯的枷锁,开始的时候轻的难以察觉,到后来却重的无法摆脱。35. 要是有个人让我倒胃口,但是和他走到一起,我能赚1亿美元,我会断然拒绝,要不和为了钱结婚有什么两样?无论什么时候,都不能为了钱结婚,要是已经很有钱了,更不能这样。36. 我有一份我热爱的工作,当年我觉得赚1,000美元是一大笔钱的时候,我就喜欢我的工作。同学们,做你们喜欢的工作,要是你总做那些自己不喜欢的工作,只是为了让简历上的工作经历更漂亮,那你真是糊涂了。37. 你财富自由之后想做什么工作,现在就该做什么工作,这样的工作才是理想的工作。38. 做自己不喜欢的工作,不觉得有点像年轻的时候把性生活省下来,留到岁数大的时候再用吗?或早或晚,你们都应该开始做自己真心想做的事。39. 我们从来不想已经过去的事,我们觉得未来有那么多值得期待的,何必对过去耿耿于怀。不纠结过去的事,纠结也没用,人生只能向前看。40. 一辈子都做自己喜欢的事,交自己喜欢的人。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"BRK.A":1,"BRK.B":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":3047,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9034258376,"gmtCreate":1647909224774,"gmtModify":1676534278141,"author":{"id":"3567665939928011","authorId":"3567665939928011","name":"seraph2020","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3391e117ae079b90cb54b08eec39043","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3567665939928011","idStr":"3567665939928011"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9034258376","repostId":"1129199259","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1129199259","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1647874342,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1129199259?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-03-21 22:52","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Night Reading | Munger: Do these things well, and the road to wealth and freedom is simple","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1129199259","media":"期乐会","summary":"芒格认为,每个人想参与投资游戏的人都必须了解自己的天性,都必须在考虑自己的边际效用和心理承受能力后才能开始投资。几十年以来,在股神巴菲特的光环背后默默站着一个人,他就是查理·芒格。他们年轻时相识,彼此","content":"<p><html><head></head><body>Munger believes that everyone who wants to participate in the investment game must understand their nature and must consider their marginal utility and psychological affordability before they can start investing. For decades, a man stood silently behind the aura of Warren Buffett, and he was Charlie Munger. They knew each other when they were young, admired each other, and shared high values. Buffett did not mince words: Without Munger, I would be much poorer than I am now. My gratitude to him is beyond words. They are life partners with comparable intelligence, and they are the co-creators of the investment miracle of 19.2% CAGR in 51 years. The difference is that Munger is too low-key. Every spring, thousands of people go to Omaha, Nebraska, to attend Berkshire's annual shareholder meeting to see Buffett, but they are also very interested in the man sitting next to Buffett on stage who helps the Omaha wise man answer questions from time to time.</p><p>The performance usually goes like this:</p><p>Buffett answered the questions first, and the length of time was up to him. He would turn to Munger and ask: Do you have anything to add? Munger sat motionless and answered simply and brusquely: Nothing to add. Occasionally, Munger, based on his rich experience and experience, would make some points and then make a short paragraph. Once Munger spoke, the audience listened to him with full attention. In his quest for life wisdom, he doesn't care if he stands in the spotlight. Even, he wants his wealth to stay just below the level of the Forbes Rich List, so that he can avoid the spotlight and the public attention. Buffett's eldest son once said: My dad is the second smartest person I know, Charlie Munger first.</p><p>Munger is an outstanding investment thinker, but he was not born that way. In his only authorized biography, Buffett's Behind the Scenes: The Biography of Charlie Munger, he shows the details of his thinking and the key to becoming an investment big coffee.</p><p>1. Self-improvement is the most important thing</p><p>Munger believes: \"If you want to win first, you have to take the lead and never stand still. I always get into a business and do better than everyone else. Why? The answer is to improve your cultivation through self-study. That's a really good idea that works.\"</p><p><b>What Munger said about self-study is never-ending self-improvement.</b>On this path of self-improvement, he valued three things most:</p><p><b>First, think for yourself.</b></p><p>If you are completely dependent on others in your thinking process and always listen to others'so-called \"professional opinions,\" he says, once you leave your little world, catastrophe will be imminent.</p><p>Graham is Buffett's teacher, the originator of value investment, and the main source of Buffett's early investment ideas. But Munger does not fully identify with Graham, who believes that many of his views ignore reality. \"Graham has blind spots in his mind. He doesn't realize that there are businesses worth investing in ahead of time.\"</p><p>It is at this point that Buffett believes that Munger has the greatest influence on him, and with strong willpower, he releases him from Graham's limiting view and pushes him into the direction of \"buying high-quality assets at the right price\".</p><p>It is precisely because of this that Buffett said, \"Without Munger, I would be much poorer than I am now.\" The classic investment case of Buffett's purchase of BYD and a huge profit of more than 20 times, which everyone talks about, is also a decision made by Buffett under Munger's persistence. \"I really want to say that it was my decision to invest in BYD, but no. It was not my decision to invest in BYD, nor was it the decision of my investment team. Instead, one day Munger called me and said: We must invest in BYD.\"</p><p>Munger never blindly follows experts in his life. He has his own doctors and accountants. He will refer to their opinions, but he will not trust them all. He considered what they said, then studied it himself, and finally came to a conclusion.</p><p><b>Secondly, the role of reading is beyond imagination.</b></p><p>Munger was a hungry reader, with books everywhere in his room, bed, and chair, but he was not a fan of novels. He read either business, biography, history or technology, all based on facts.</p><p>Munger said: \"I was very clear about why I was collecting this information. I thought about what facts I wanted to know before I started, and then I decided if the data I saw matched the basic concepts. A lot of purposeful reading can give people a subconscious habit of connecting what they read to the basic concepts, and gradually they accumulate wisdom about investing. You can't be a really good investor without reading a lot. \"</p><p>According to Munger, reading business magazines is a shortcut.</p><p>Buffett and I have learned more from good business magazines than anywhere else, and it is so simple and effective to get a variety of business lessons by quickly flipping through issue after issue. If you want to be a little smarter, you have to keep asking why, why, why, he says.</p><p>Munger is also a biographical freak. He believes that when it comes to mastering some great ideas that work, it is best to combine them with the life and personality of great men. \"Making friends with right-minded deceased great men\" sounds funny, but if you do it all your life, it definitely helps.</p><p>Munger studied the lives and scientific works of Einstein, Darwin, and Newton, but his favorite deceased great was always Franklin. Munger appreciated Franklin as the best writer, investor, scientist, diplomat, businessman in America at the time, while making great contributions to education and social welfare causes.</p><p>It was from Franklin that Munger developed the idea that it is necessary to become rich to freely contribute to human society. \"I've always been more interested in being a useful person than simply becoming rich.\"</p><p><b>Third, necessary interdisciplinary thinking.</b></p><p>Munger believes that people who have only a single disciplinary mindset are like people who have only a hammer. And as the famous proverb goes, any problem looks a lot like a nail to someone with only a hammer. People who think in a single discipline have great limitations.</p><p>To form interdisciplinary thinking, Munger's suggestion is that everyone should not be required to have the same mastery of celestial mechanics as Laplace, nor should ordinary people be required to reach such a level of mastery in other fields of knowledge.</p><p>On the contrary, there are not many concepts that really matter in each discipline, and only a general understanding is needed to grasp the essence. As long as you master the most basic principles and concepts in the discipline, and then use them constantly, practice using a variety of disciplinary thinking to solve practical problems, you can finally make yourself an advantage.</p><p>He used himself as an example: he has never studied psychology seriously, but he is interested in psychology, and has conducted some self-study. With the content of self-study, he has gained a huge advantage in investment and life; As a law school student, professional study is far from natural science, but because of serious study of mathematics and physics classes, mastered some natural science thinking methods, gained the overall thinking advantage. He said:</p><p>I learned from physicists to solve problems by finding the simplest and most straightforward answers. The easiest way is always the best way. I learned again from mathematicians to look at the problem upside down, or look at it on the other side, reverse it, and reverse it again. Second, in Munger's eyes, the road to wealth and freedom is simple</p><p><b>1. Know yourself well</b></p><p>Munger believes that everyone who wants to participate in the investment game must understand their nature and must consider their marginal utility and psychological affordability before they can start investing.</p><p>If losses make you miserable — and some losses are inevitable — you should choose a very conservative approach to investing and saving throughout your life. You have to incorporate your nature and talent into your investment strategy, and there is no universally applicable investment strategy.<b>2. To invest in good business</b></p><p>Before the acquisition of See's Candy, Buffett and Munger were bargain-hunting professionals. \"If they had asked for another $100,000, we wouldn't have bought it,\" Munger said. \"We were that stupid.\"</p><p>When they discovered that See's Candy was a brilliant business, Munger realized that it was much easier and more enjoyable to acquire a quality business to keep it running than to buy a company that was struggling at a low price and then consume time and effort to save it.</p><p>Buffett said that if they didn't buy See's candy, they probably wouldn't have bought Coca-Cola later. Munger said,</p><p>I've learned a lot from See's Candy: Thinking and acting in ways that must stand the test of time. Such experience has made our acquisitions elsewhere smarter and made better decisions.<b>3. Learn to judge whether a business is a good business</b></p><p>Munger had unusually accurate judgments about business. Buffett once said, \"Munger can analyze and evaluate any transaction faster and more accurately than anyone in the world. He can see all possible flaws in 60 seconds, and he is a perfect partner.\"</p><p>Munger believes that to judge whether a business is good business, one needs to ask how long can this last?</p><p>I know only one way to answer this question, and that is to think about what caused the situation now — and then to figure out how long before the impetus for these outcomes will cease to exist.<b>4. When buying stocks in the stock market, what should the stock price be</b></p><p>The ability to answer this question explains why some people invest successfully and others don't. \"But then again, if it weren't for the difficulty of the question, everyone would have become rich,\" Munger firmly believed.</p><p>Looking at the industry over the long term gives investors better insight in answering this question.</p><p>There used to be a lot of downtown department stores that seemed invincible. The owner offers customers a large number of shopping options, has strong purchasing power, and has the most expensive property in the city, with multiple streetcar lines passing through the corner of the mall. However, over time, private cars became the dominant mode of transportation. Streetcar tracks disappeared, customers moved to live in the suburbs, and shopping malls became major shopping places. A few simple changes in our lives can completely change the long-term value of a business.<b>5. Consider redundancy factors</b></p><p>While few companies stand, Munger says, every company should have been created with the expectation of surviving for many years. \"Building a dangerous bridge is a crime, but setting up a fragile company is not noble?\" Therefore, Munger believes that the \"redundancy factor\" of the enterprise should be considered. Just as when repairing a bridge, the redundancy factor is needed to cope with extreme pressure, the company should also be able to withstand the pressure from competitors, economic recession, oil crisis, and other natural and man-made disasters. Too much leverage or debt can leave companies vulnerable to economic storms.</p><p>Many Chinese investors have found that Munger has a spirit and tradition similar to that of traditional Chinese scholar-bureaucrats-he acquires wisdom through learning, achieves business success entirely by his own cultivation, adheres to ideals and beliefs, follows moral principles, is rational, honest, optimistic and full of ultimate concern for society. Reading Munger's biography and learning about Munger is an unusual journey for us to explore the ways in which the business society can succeed.</p><p><b>Munger's golden sentence:</b></p><p>You must do business with people of high caliber and never play wrestling with a pig, because if you do, both of you will get dirty, but the pig will enjoy it.</p><p>The difference between a good business and a bad business is that in a good business you will make one easy decision after another, whereas the decisions of a bad business are often painful.</p><p>I am a biographer myself. For example, if you became friends with Adam Smith, you would be better at economics. It sounds funny to make friends with great men who have died, but if you do it all your life, you will benefit a lot.</p><p>The investment game is all about making more accurate predictions about the future than anyone else. How do we do that? One way is to run this competition in a limited number of areas. If you try to predict the future of everything, you will fail because of a lack of expertise.</p><p>If you want to be smart, you have to keep asking why? Why? Why? At the same time, you must connect the answer to the structured deep theory. You must know the main theories. It's slightly laborious, but fun.</p><p>Munger never directs people exactly what they should do. What he handed to the audience was a map that could find a treasure of wisdom. Only when you truly understand the meaning of the instructions and follow them all the way to the end will the doors of the treasure open for you.</p><p></body></html></p>","source":"lsy1645511055786","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Night Reading | Munger: Do these things well, and the road to wealth and freedom is simple</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nNight Reading | Munger: Do these things well, and the road to wealth and freedom is simple\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">期乐会</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2022-03-21 22:52</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p><html><head></head><body>Munger believes that everyone who wants to participate in the investment game must understand their nature and must consider their marginal utility and psychological affordability before they can start investing. For decades, a man stood silently behind the aura of Warren Buffett, and he was Charlie Munger. They knew each other when they were young, admired each other, and shared high values. Buffett did not mince words: Without Munger, I would be much poorer than I am now. My gratitude to him is beyond words. They are life partners with comparable intelligence, and they are the co-creators of the investment miracle of 19.2% CAGR in 51 years. The difference is that Munger is too low-key. Every spring, thousands of people go to Omaha, Nebraska, to attend Berkshire's annual shareholder meeting to see Buffett, but they are also very interested in the man sitting next to Buffett on stage who helps the Omaha wise man answer questions from time to time.</p><p>The performance usually goes like this:</p><p>Buffett answered the questions first, and the length of time was up to him. He would turn to Munger and ask: Do you have anything to add? Munger sat motionless and answered simply and brusquely: Nothing to add. Occasionally, Munger, based on his rich experience and experience, would make some points and then make a short paragraph. Once Munger spoke, the audience listened to him with full attention. In his quest for life wisdom, he doesn't care if he stands in the spotlight. Even, he wants his wealth to stay just below the level of the Forbes Rich List, so that he can avoid the spotlight and the public attention. Buffett's eldest son once said: My dad is the second smartest person I know, Charlie Munger first.</p><p>Munger is an outstanding investment thinker, but he was not born that way. In his only authorized biography, Buffett's Behind the Scenes: The Biography of Charlie Munger, he shows the details of his thinking and the key to becoming an investment big coffee.</p><p>1. Self-improvement is the most important thing</p><p>Munger believes: \"If you want to win first, you have to take the lead and never stand still. I always get into a business and do better than everyone else. Why? The answer is to improve your cultivation through self-study. That's a really good idea that works.\"</p><p><b>What Munger said about self-study is never-ending self-improvement.</b>On this path of self-improvement, he valued three things most:</p><p><b>First, think for yourself.</b></p><p>If you are completely dependent on others in your thinking process and always listen to others'so-called \"professional opinions,\" he says, once you leave your little world, catastrophe will be imminent.</p><p>Graham is Buffett's teacher, the originator of value investment, and the main source of Buffett's early investment ideas. But Munger does not fully identify with Graham, who believes that many of his views ignore reality. \"Graham has blind spots in his mind. He doesn't realize that there are businesses worth investing in ahead of time.\"</p><p>It is at this point that Buffett believes that Munger has the greatest influence on him, and with strong willpower, he releases him from Graham's limiting view and pushes him into the direction of \"buying high-quality assets at the right price\".</p><p>It is precisely because of this that Buffett said, \"Without Munger, I would be much poorer than I am now.\" The classic investment case of Buffett's purchase of BYD and a huge profit of more than 20 times, which everyone talks about, is also a decision made by Buffett under Munger's persistence. \"I really want to say that it was my decision to invest in BYD, but no. It was not my decision to invest in BYD, nor was it the decision of my investment team. Instead, one day Munger called me and said: We must invest in BYD.\"</p><p>Munger never blindly follows experts in his life. He has his own doctors and accountants. He will refer to their opinions, but he will not trust them all. He considered what they said, then studied it himself, and finally came to a conclusion.</p><p><b>Secondly, the role of reading is beyond imagination.</b></p><p>Munger was a hungry reader, with books everywhere in his room, bed, and chair, but he was not a fan of novels. He read either business, biography, history or technology, all based on facts.</p><p>Munger said: \"I was very clear about why I was collecting this information. I thought about what facts I wanted to know before I started, and then I decided if the data I saw matched the basic concepts. A lot of purposeful reading can give people a subconscious habit of connecting what they read to the basic concepts, and gradually they accumulate wisdom about investing. You can't be a really good investor without reading a lot. \"</p><p>According to Munger, reading business magazines is a shortcut.</p><p>Buffett and I have learned more from good business magazines than anywhere else, and it is so simple and effective to get a variety of business lessons by quickly flipping through issue after issue. If you want to be a little smarter, you have to keep asking why, why, why, he says.</p><p>Munger is also a biographical freak. He believes that when it comes to mastering some great ideas that work, it is best to combine them with the life and personality of great men. \"Making friends with right-minded deceased great men\" sounds funny, but if you do it all your life, it definitely helps.</p><p>Munger studied the lives and scientific works of Einstein, Darwin, and Newton, but his favorite deceased great was always Franklin. Munger appreciated Franklin as the best writer, investor, scientist, diplomat, businessman in America at the time, while making great contributions to education and social welfare causes.</p><p>It was from Franklin that Munger developed the idea that it is necessary to become rich to freely contribute to human society. \"I've always been more interested in being a useful person than simply becoming rich.\"</p><p><b>Third, necessary interdisciplinary thinking.</b></p><p>Munger believes that people who have only a single disciplinary mindset are like people who have only a hammer. And as the famous proverb goes, any problem looks a lot like a nail to someone with only a hammer. People who think in a single discipline have great limitations.</p><p>To form interdisciplinary thinking, Munger's suggestion is that everyone should not be required to have the same mastery of celestial mechanics as Laplace, nor should ordinary people be required to reach such a level of mastery in other fields of knowledge.</p><p>On the contrary, there are not many concepts that really matter in each discipline, and only a general understanding is needed to grasp the essence. As long as you master the most basic principles and concepts in the discipline, and then use them constantly, practice using a variety of disciplinary thinking to solve practical problems, you can finally make yourself an advantage.</p><p>He used himself as an example: he has never studied psychology seriously, but he is interested in psychology, and has conducted some self-study. With the content of self-study, he has gained a huge advantage in investment and life; As a law school student, professional study is far from natural science, but because of serious study of mathematics and physics classes, mastered some natural science thinking methods, gained the overall thinking advantage. He said:</p><p>I learned from physicists to solve problems by finding the simplest and most straightforward answers. The easiest way is always the best way. I learned again from mathematicians to look at the problem upside down, or look at it on the other side, reverse it, and reverse it again. Second, in Munger's eyes, the road to wealth and freedom is simple</p><p><b>1. Know yourself well</b></p><p>Munger believes that everyone who wants to participate in the investment game must understand their nature and must consider their marginal utility and psychological affordability before they can start investing.</p><p>If losses make you miserable — and some losses are inevitable — you should choose a very conservative approach to investing and saving throughout your life. You have to incorporate your nature and talent into your investment strategy, and there is no universally applicable investment strategy.<b>2. To invest in good business</b></p><p>Before the acquisition of See's Candy, Buffett and Munger were bargain-hunting professionals. \"If they had asked for another $100,000, we wouldn't have bought it,\" Munger said. \"We were that stupid.\"</p><p>When they discovered that See's Candy was a brilliant business, Munger realized that it was much easier and more enjoyable to acquire a quality business to keep it running than to buy a company that was struggling at a low price and then consume time and effort to save it.</p><p>Buffett said that if they didn't buy See's candy, they probably wouldn't have bought Coca-Cola later. Munger said,</p><p>I've learned a lot from See's Candy: Thinking and acting in ways that must stand the test of time. Such experience has made our acquisitions elsewhere smarter and made better decisions.<b>3. Learn to judge whether a business is a good business</b></p><p>Munger had unusually accurate judgments about business. Buffett once said, \"Munger can analyze and evaluate any transaction faster and more accurately than anyone in the world. He can see all possible flaws in 60 seconds, and he is a perfect partner.\"</p><p>Munger believes that to judge whether a business is good business, one needs to ask how long can this last?</p><p>I know only one way to answer this question, and that is to think about what caused the situation now — and then to figure out how long before the impetus for these outcomes will cease to exist.<b>4. When buying stocks in the stock market, what should the stock price be</b></p><p>The ability to answer this question explains why some people invest successfully and others don't. \"But then again, if it weren't for the difficulty of the question, everyone would have become rich,\" Munger firmly believed.</p><p>Looking at the industry over the long term gives investors better insight in answering this question.</p><p>There used to be a lot of downtown department stores that seemed invincible. The owner offers customers a large number of shopping options, has strong purchasing power, and has the most expensive property in the city, with multiple streetcar lines passing through the corner of the mall. However, over time, private cars became the dominant mode of transportation. Streetcar tracks disappeared, customers moved to live in the suburbs, and shopping malls became major shopping places. A few simple changes in our lives can completely change the long-term value of a business.<b>5. Consider redundancy factors</b></p><p>While few companies stand, Munger says, every company should have been created with the expectation of surviving for many years. \"Building a dangerous bridge is a crime, but setting up a fragile company is not noble?\" Therefore, Munger believes that the \"redundancy factor\" of the enterprise should be considered. Just as when repairing a bridge, the redundancy factor is needed to cope with extreme pressure, the company should also be able to withstand the pressure from competitors, economic recession, oil crisis, and other natural and man-made disasters. Too much leverage or debt can leave companies vulnerable to economic storms.</p><p>Many Chinese investors have found that Munger has a spirit and tradition similar to that of traditional Chinese scholar-bureaucrats-he acquires wisdom through learning, achieves business success entirely by his own cultivation, adheres to ideals and beliefs, follows moral principles, is rational, honest, optimistic and full of ultimate concern for society. Reading Munger's biography and learning about Munger is an unusual journey for us to explore the ways in which the business society can succeed.</p><p><b>Munger's golden sentence:</b></p><p>You must do business with people of high caliber and never play wrestling with a pig, because if you do, both of you will get dirty, but the pig will enjoy it.</p><p>The difference between a good business and a bad business is that in a good business you will make one easy decision after another, whereas the decisions of a bad business are often painful.</p><p>I am a biographer myself. For example, if you became friends with Adam Smith, you would be better at economics. It sounds funny to make friends with great men who have died, but if you do it all your life, you will benefit a lot.</p><p>The investment game is all about making more accurate predictions about the future than anyone else. How do we do that? One way is to run this competition in a limited number of areas. If you try to predict the future of everything, you will fail because of a lack of expertise.</p><p>If you want to be smart, you have to keep asking why? Why? Why? At the same time, you must connect the answer to the structured deep theory. You must know the main theories. It's slightly laborious, but fun.</p><p>Munger never directs people exactly what they should do. What he handed to the audience was a map that could find a treasure of wisdom. Only when you truly understand the meaning of the instructions and follow them all the way to the end will the doors of the treasure open for you.</p><p></body></html></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source:<a href=\"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/JhLeIViECJAVJNuuvMNDPA\">期乐会</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/7d30d3e4a8c584dc0c7143999338c880","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/JhLeIViECJAVJNuuvMNDPA","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1129199259","content_text":"芒格认为,每个人想参与投资游戏的人都必须了解自己的天性,都必须在考虑自己的边际效用和心理承受能力后才能开始投资。几十年以来,在股神巴菲特的光环背后默默站着一个人,他就是查理·芒格。他们年轻时相识,彼此欣赏,价值观高度一致,巴菲特毫不讳言地说:没有芒格,我会比现在贫穷很多。我对他的感激无以言表。他们是智慧相当的人生合伙人,是51年年复合增长率19.2%的投资奇迹共同的创造者,不同之处在于芒格实在过于低调。每年春天,数以千计的人前往位于内布拉斯加州的奥马哈参加伯克希尔公司的年度股东大会,他们是去看巴菲特的,不过对台上那个坐在巴菲特身边,时不时帮助这位奥马哈智者回答问题的人,他们也非常感兴趣。表演通常是这样进行的:巴菲特先回答问题,时间长短由他决定。临了,他会转向芒格,问道:你还有什么要补充的吗?芒格一动不动地端坐在那里,回答简单而粗率:没什么要补充的。偶尔,芒格基于自身丰富的阅历和经验,也会提出一些观点,然后说上一小段。一旦芒格开口说话,听众们都会全神贯注地听他发表看法。在追寻人生智慧的途中,他不在意自己是否站在聚光灯下。甚至,他希望自己的财富恰好保持在福布斯富豪榜名单的水准之下,这样他就能避开聚光灯,免受公众的关注。巴菲特的长子曾说:我爸是我认识的人中第二聪明的,查理•芒格第一。芒格是一位杰出的投资思想家,但他并非生来如此,他在自己唯一授权的传记《巴菲特幕后智囊:查理·芒格传》一书中,展示了自己思考的细节和成为投资大咖的关键。一、自我提升最重要芒格认为:\"要想赢得第一,就必须占得先机,千万不要原地踏步。我总是刚刚涉足某一业务就比其他人干得都要好。为什么?答案就是通过自学来提高修养,这才是真正行之有效的好主意。\"芒格说的自学,就是永不停歇的自我提升。在这条自我提升之路上,他最看重的有三点:首先,独立思考。他说,如果你在思考过程中完全依赖他人,总是听别人的所谓“专业意见”,一旦你离开自己的小天地,就会大难临头。格雷厄姆是巴菲特的老师,价值投资的开山鼻祖,巴菲特前期投资思想的主要来源。但芒格并不完全认同格雷厄姆,他认为格雷厄姆很多观点无视现实情况。“格雷厄姆思想中有盲点,他没有意识到有的生意值得提前投入。”正是在这一点上,巴菲特认为芒格对他的影响最大,用强大的意志力把他从格雷厄姆有局限性的观点中释放出来,推向了\"以合适价格买优质资产\"这个方向。也正是因为这一点,巴菲特才说,\"没有芒格,我会比现在贫穷很多\"。大家津津乐道的巴菲特购买比亚迪,大赚20多倍的经典投资案例,也是在芒格极力坚持下,巴菲特才做出的决定。\"我很想说投资比亚迪是我的决定,但不是,投资比亚迪不是我的决定,也不是我的投资团队的决定,而是有一天芒格打电话给我说:我们必须投资比亚迪。\"芒格在生活中也绝不盲从专家,他有自己的医生、会计师,他会参考他们的意见,但不会全信。他斟酌他们说的,然后自己研究,最后才得出结论。其次,阅读的作用超乎想象。芒格是一个如饥似渴的读书人,他的房间里、床上、椅子上到处是书,但他并不是一个小说迷,他看的不是商业类、传记类就是历史类或者科技类,都是以事实为基础的。芒格说:\"我对自己为什么要搜集这些信息十分清晰。在开始之前就想好要了解哪些事实,然后去判断所看到的数据是否符合基本概念。大量有目的的阅读可以让人在潜意识里养成一种习惯,把读到的东西和基本概念联系起来,逐渐就会累积起有关投资的智慧。如果没有进行过大量的阅读,不可能成为一个真正出色的投资人。\"芒格认为,阅读商业杂志是一条捷径。巴菲特和我从优秀的商业类杂志中学到的比其他任何地方学到的都要多,只要很快地翻阅一期又一期的杂志,就可以得到各种各样的商业经验,这种方法是如此简单而有效。他说,你要想变得聪明一点,就必须不断地问为什么、为什么、为什么。芒格还是一个传记狂。他认为,要掌握一些行之有效的伟大观念时,最好和伟人的生平和个性结合起来。\"和思路正确的离世伟人交朋友\"听起来滑稽,但是如果一生都这样做,绝对大有裨益。芒格研究过爱因斯坦、达尔文和牛顿的生平和科学著作,不过他最喜欢的离世伟人从来都是富兰克林。芒格欣赏富兰克林是当时美国最好的作家、投资家、科学家、外交家、商人,同时为教育和社会福利事业做出了巨大的贡献。芒格正是从富兰克林那里形成了一种观念:要变得富有才能自由地为人类社会做贡献。\"我从来都对成为一个有用的人兴趣更大,而不是单纯地变得有钱\"。第三,必需的跨学科思维。芒格认为,只有单一学科思维的人,就像只有一把锤子的人。而就像那句著名的谚语说的那样,对只有一把锤子的人来说,任何问题看起来都很像钉子。单一学科思维的人具有很大局限性。而要形成跨学科思维,芒格的建议是,不能苛求每个人对天体力学的掌握达到与拉普拉斯并驾齐驱的地步,也不应苛求普通人在其他知识领域也达到如此精湛的水平。相反,每门学科真正重要的概念并不多,只需要大体了解,就能掌握精髓。而只要掌握学科中最基本的原理和概念,然后不断运用,练习用多种学科思维来解决实际问题,最终就能让自己形成优势。他用自己举例:从来没正经学过心理学,但对心理学有兴趣,进行了一些自学,凭借自学的内容,就在投资和生活中获得了巨大优势;作为法学院的学生,专业学习离自然科学很远,但因为认真学过数学课和物理课,掌握了自然科学的一些思考方法,就获得了整体的思维优势。他说:我从物理学家那里学会了通过寻找最简单、最直接的答案来解决问题。最容易的方法永远都是最好的方法。我又从数学家那里学会了将问题倒过来看,或者从反面去看,反转,再反转。二、在芒格眼里,通往财富自由之路是简单的1.充分了解自己芒格认为,每个人想参与投资游戏的人都必须了解自己的天性,都必须在考虑自己的边际效用和心理承受能力后才能开始投资。如果亏损会让你痛苦——而且有些亏损是不可避免的——那你毕生都应该选择一种非常保守的投资和储蓄方式。你必须将自己的天性和天分融入自己的投资策略中,没有一种普遍适用的投资策略。2.要投好生意在收购喜诗糖果之前,巴菲特和芒格还是捡便宜专业户。\"要是他们再多要10万美元,我们就不会买了,\"芒格说,\"我们当时就是那么愚蠢\"。当他们发现喜诗糖果是一桩出色的生意后,芒格意识到,收购一笔优质业务让它继续运作下去,比买下一家价格很低却在苦苦挣扎的公司,然后费时费力去拯救它要容易和愉快得多。巴菲特说,如果没有买喜诗糖果,那他们可能后面也就不会买可口可乐了。芒格则说:从喜诗糖果我学到了很多:思考和行事方式必须经得起时间的考验。这样的经验让我们在其他地方的收购更为明智,做出了更好的决定。3.要学会判断一门生意是不是好生意芒格对于生意有异乎寻常的准确判断。巴菲特曾经说,\"芒格能比世界上任何人更快更准地分析和评估任何一项交易。他能在60秒内看到所有可能的缺陷,他是一个完美的合伙人。\"芒格认为,要判断一门生意是不是好生意,就需要问这样的情况能持续多久?我只知道一种方法来回答这个问题,那就是思考:是什么造成了现在的局面——然后去弄明白造成这些结果的动力多久后将不复存在。4.在股市里买股票,股价应该是多少是否有能力回答这个问题就解释了为什么有人投资成功而有人没有。\"不过话说回来,要不是这个问题有一点难度的话,每个人都会变得有钱。\"芒格坚定地认为。长期观察行业情况会让投资者在回答这个问题上有更好的洞察力。以前有很多市中心百货商店,看来是不可战胜的。店主为顾客提供大量购物选择、购买力强大,还拥有城里最贵的物业,商场街角多条有轨电车线路经过。然而,随着时间的推移,私家车成了主要的交通模式。有轨电车的轨道消失了,顾客们搬到了郊区居住,购物中心成了主要购物场所。我们生活中一些简单的变化就能完全改变一项业务的长期价值。5.考虑冗余系数芒格说,虽然很少有公司屹立不倒,但是每一家公司都应该在创建的时候预计到要存着许多年。\"造一座危桥是犯罪,成立一家脆弱的公司又何尝高尚?\"所以,芒格认为应该考虑企业的\"冗余系数\",就像修桥的时候,需要冗余系数来应对极端压力,公司也应该能抵抗来自竞争者、经济衰退、石油危机以及其他天灾人祸的压力。过多地运用杠杆工具或欠债都会让公司在经济风暴中脆弱得不堪一击。很多中国投资家发现芒格身上有类似中国传统士大夫的精神和传统——他通过学习获取智慧,完全依靠自身修养获得商业成功,坚守理想和信念,遵循道德准则,理性、诚实、乐观、对社会充满终极关怀。阅读芒格传记,了解芒格,是我们探索商业社会成功方式的一次不同寻常的旅程。芒格金句:你一定要和高水准的人做生意,永远不要和一头猪玩摔跤,因为如果你这么做了,你们两个都会变脏,但是猪会乐在其中。好企业和差企业之间的区别在于,在好企业里你会做出一个接一个的轻松决定,而差企业的决定则常常是痛苦万分的。我本人是一个传记狂,比如你要是和亚当·斯密成了朋友,那你一定会把经济学得更好。跟离世的伟人交朋友,这听起来很滑稽,但如果你一生都这样做,你会受益匪浅。投资游戏说到底就是要比其他人对未来做出更准确的预言。要如何做到呢?一种方法是将这种竞争在有限的几个区域中进行。如果你试图预言所有事情的未来,你会因为缺乏专长而失败。如果你想变得聪明,你就必须不停地问为什么?为什么?为什么?同时你还必须将答案和有条理的深层理论联系起来。你必须知道那些最主要的理论。这稍微会有些费力,但充满乐趣。芒格从不指导人们具体应该做些什么。他交给听众的是一幅能找到智慧宝藏的地图。只有当你真正理解了指令的含义并且一路遵循到底,宝藏的大门才会为你而开。","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2927,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":818632243,"gmtCreate":1630401421282,"gmtModify":1676530292743,"author":{"id":"3567665939928011","authorId":"3567665939928011","name":"seraph2020","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3391e117ae079b90cb54b08eec39043","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3567665939928011","idStr":"3567665939928011"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Good","listText":"Good","text":"Good","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/818632243","repostId":"818889793","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":818889793,"gmtCreate":1630395373112,"gmtModify":1676530290260,"author":{"id":"3570515415388899","authorId":"3570515415388899","name":"侃见财经","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/58a85251003e9d3ca730ab71b7738ce8","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3570515415388899","idStr":"3570515415388899"},"themes":[],"title":"市值突破2.5萬億美元,回購近4500億美元,iPhone13你會買嗎?","htmlText":"時間是優秀企業的朋友,平庸企業的敵人——巴菲特 五年前,當巴菲特第一次買入蘋果公司時,恰逢蘋果<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$蘋果(AAPL)$</a> 業績出現了拐點,對於巴菲特的操作,華爾街不少分析師認爲,“股神”老矣。五年時間過去了,2018年美股大跌,去年因爲疫情美股大跌,均是蘋果公司挽救了股神的名聲,讓巴菲特不至於在臨近退休的最後幾年裏跌落“神壇”。近期,巴菲特旗下的伯克希爾哈撒韋向美國SEC提交了13F表,文件顯示,伯克希爾哈撒韋公司前三大持倉分別爲蘋果、美國銀行以及美國運通,值得一提的是伯克希爾持有8.87億股蘋果公司股票,佔其持倉比例爲41.45%,而伯克希爾哈撒韋第二大持倉股美國銀行也僅佔其持倉的14.21%,差距明顯。至於巴菲特爲什麼如此偏愛蘋果公司。答案是太賺錢了。段永平曾經說過,不賺錢的生意,多少營業額都沒有用。爲此他還曾舉過一個例子,他說比如你在沒有人煙的地方建一個酒店,花了一億,每年虧500萬,重置成本還是一個億,當下想5000萬出售,誰要?曾經有媒體採訪過巴菲特,問他爲什麼要買入蘋果公司。巴菲特回答道,我並不關心下個季度或者明年的收入情況,因爲報表沒有辦法提供具體的數據,但你知道成千上百萬的用戶離不開它們,那款小小的手機幾乎就是世界上最有價值的資產。蘋果擁有數以億計的用戶,當手機每天都能幫助用戶做各種各樣的事情,這樣貨真價實的資產無異於一筆財富。實際上,如果按照現在的股價計算,五年時間巴菲特在蘋果上至少賺了7倍,其中還不包括每年的分紅。當下,蘋果股價繼續創出了歷史新高,市值超過了2.5萬億美元。當我們回頭來看十年前喬布斯的選擇,實際上沒有人比庫克更爲合適,儘管這十年很多人都質疑,蘋果失去了“靈魂”,其不僅產品價格越來越貴,產品設計也越來越像擠牙膏。2019年,在","listText":"時間是優秀企業的朋友,平庸企業的敵人——巴菲特 五年前,當巴菲特第一次買入蘋果公司時,恰逢蘋果<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/AAPL\">$蘋果(AAPL)$</a> 業績出現了拐點,對於巴菲特的操作,華爾街不少分析師認爲,“股神”老矣。五年時間過去了,2018年美股大跌,去年因爲疫情美股大跌,均是蘋果公司挽救了股神的名聲,讓巴菲特不至於在臨近退休的最後幾年裏跌落“神壇”。近期,巴菲特旗下的伯克希爾哈撒韋向美國SEC提交了13F表,文件顯示,伯克希爾哈撒韋公司前三大持倉分別爲蘋果、美國銀行以及美國運通,值得一提的是伯克希爾持有8.87億股蘋果公司股票,佔其持倉比例爲41.45%,而伯克希爾哈撒韋第二大持倉股美國銀行也僅佔其持倉的14.21%,差距明顯。至於巴菲特爲什麼如此偏愛蘋果公司。答案是太賺錢了。段永平曾經說過,不賺錢的生意,多少營業額都沒有用。爲此他還曾舉過一個例子,他說比如你在沒有人煙的地方建一個酒店,花了一億,每年虧500萬,重置成本還是一個億,當下想5000萬出售,誰要?曾經有媒體採訪過巴菲特,問他爲什麼要買入蘋果公司。巴菲特回答道,我並不關心下個季度或者明年的收入情況,因爲報表沒有辦法提供具體的數據,但你知道成千上百萬的用戶離不開它們,那款小小的手機幾乎就是世界上最有價值的資產。蘋果擁有數以億計的用戶,當手機每天都能幫助用戶做各種各樣的事情,這樣貨真價實的資產無異於一筆財富。實際上,如果按照現在的股價計算,五年時間巴菲特在蘋果上至少賺了7倍,其中還不包括每年的分紅。當下,蘋果股價繼續創出了歷史新高,市值超過了2.5萬億美元。當我們回頭來看十年前喬布斯的選擇,實際上沒有人比庫克更爲合適,儘管這十年很多人都質疑,蘋果失去了“靈魂”,其不僅產品價格越來越貴,產品設計也越來越像擠牙膏。2019年,在","text":"時間是優秀企業的朋友,平庸企業的敵人——巴菲特 五年前,當巴菲特第一次買入蘋果公司時,恰逢蘋果$蘋果(AAPL)$ 業績出現了拐點,對於巴菲特的操作,華爾街不少分析師認爲,“股神”老矣。五年時間過去了,2018年美股大跌,去年因爲疫情美股大跌,均是蘋果公司挽救了股神的名聲,讓巴菲特不至於在臨近退休的最後幾年裏跌落“神壇”。近期,巴菲特旗下的伯克希爾哈撒韋向美國SEC提交了13F表,文件顯示,伯克希爾哈撒韋公司前三大持倉分別爲蘋果、美國銀行以及美國運通,值得一提的是伯克希爾持有8.87億股蘋果公司股票,佔其持倉比例爲41.45%,而伯克希爾哈撒韋第二大持倉股美國銀行也僅佔其持倉的14.21%,差距明顯。至於巴菲特爲什麼如此偏愛蘋果公司。答案是太賺錢了。段永平曾經說過,不賺錢的生意,多少營業額都沒有用。爲此他還曾舉過一個例子,他說比如你在沒有人煙的地方建一個酒店,花了一億,每年虧500萬,重置成本還是一個億,當下想5000萬出售,誰要?曾經有媒體採訪過巴菲特,問他爲什麼要買入蘋果公司。巴菲特回答道,我並不關心下個季度或者明年的收入情況,因爲報表沒有辦法提供具體的數據,但你知道成千上百萬的用戶離不開它們,那款小小的手機幾乎就是世界上最有價值的資產。蘋果擁有數以億計的用戶,當手機每天都能幫助用戶做各種各樣的事情,這樣貨真價實的資產無異於一筆財富。實際上,如果按照現在的股價計算,五年時間巴菲特在蘋果上至少賺了7倍,其中還不包括每年的分紅。當下,蘋果股價繼續創出了歷史新高,市值超過了2.5萬億美元。當我們回頭來看十年前喬布斯的選擇,實際上沒有人比庫克更爲合適,儘管這十年很多人都質疑,蘋果失去了“靈魂”,其不僅產品價格越來越貴,產品設計也越來越像擠牙膏。2019年,在","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f0ed4a732e1d44b1b42b1b9d7f518c6d","width":"688","height":"470"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/21b40452d44defd8c61644aaf7cae691","width":"688","height":"469"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/74a5b96d0d10a118c907563164acf907","width":"688","height":"465"}],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/818889793","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":4,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2873,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":804915827,"gmtCreate":1627915815969,"gmtModify":1703497873459,"author":{"id":"3567665939928011","authorId":"3567665939928011","name":"seraph2020","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3391e117ae079b90cb54b08eec39043","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3567665939928011","idStr":"3567665939928011"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/804915827","repostId":"1138385946","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1138385946","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1627904909,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1138385946?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2021-08-02 19:48","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"From the Clinton Era: The Origin, Madness, and Burst of the Internet Bubble","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1138385946","media":"张弢看世界","summary":"不要成为真正相信泡沫或者增长可以永远持续而最后一个买入的人。","content":"<p>Author: Zhang Tao</p><p>I remember once when I went to domestic Internet companies to research, I met an American fund manager in his 50s and chatted with him. Even in the US stocks dominated by FAANG, he only bought some profitable Internet companies, like Google Facebook, and even stocks like Amazon, he never bought them.<b>In fact, the reason is very simple. He is a person who has experienced the pain of the Internet bubble in 2000, or can never understand the Internet model of losing money first and then making profits.</b></p><p>Some people say that a fund manager will surely experience several crises in his career. Why do most American hedge funds last less than 20 years? Because most of The past 20 years have to overcome two hurdles, one is The Internet bubble in 2000 and The other is The financial crisis in 2008. There are many books and movies about The financial crisis, famous ones include The Big Short, Too Big to Fail, etc.<b>However, for the Internet bubble, in fact, there are very few such works, mainly because it is a bubble in a specific industry. After its burst, it did not have a huge impact on the whole global finance and economy, and the Internet later began to shine again, which seems to be a small episode.</b>But undoubtedly the story of the bursting of the dot-com bubble is brilliant enough. Maybe the internet prospered later, but those hedge funds that closed their doors because of the bursting of the bubble may be forgotten as the real losers.</p><p>Recently, I read some books and articles and did some research,<b>Write something as a summary and commemoration. After all, if we are still in this business, we must accompany or dance with the bubble, hoping to become the winner rather than the loser in the bubble.</b></p><p><b>Internet Industry Outbreak: The Best Footnote of the Golden Age of the 90s in the United States</b></p><p>After the end of the Cold War, the United States became the world's only superpower, Japan was in trouble after the bursting of the real estate bubble (also a bubble), and the world faced great changes. Clinton campaign lines<b>The famous \"Stupid, the problem is the economy!\" Allowed him to defeat then-President George H.W. Bush in 1992</b>He was elected the 42nd president of the United States, and the golden age of the 1990s kicked off.</p><p>The Clinton administration delivered on his campaign promises, coupled with the right time, the right place and the right people, the 1990s marked the peak of the U.S. economy after the 1960s,<b>GDP growth averaged 4.6 percent under Clinton, unemployment dropped from more than 7 percent in The 1980s to about 5 percent, and inflation dropped from 5.1 percent in The 1980s to an average of 2.6 percent in what has been described as The \"Fabulous Decade.\"</b>。</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e745eabc01a6647663ba9f4d727092b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"388\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>And in the technology industry,<b>In 1993, Clinton also unveiled the \"Agenda for Action\", the idea of establishing the National Information Infrastructure,</b>Familiar top-level design, familiar policy support, how this is like a story that's happening today, decades later.</p><p>Coupled with the success of personal computer companies such as IBM and Dell, personal computers began to become popular among the masses, and sales jumped.<b>The number of personal computers connected to the Internet increased from 310,000 in 1990 to 43.23 million in 2000, an increase of more than 130 times in 10 years, representing a compound growth of more than 60 percent,</b>What a surprising and familiar number again, and it seems that this number means that this buy can never be wrong.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/916155fbed3707499dc9384733188e43\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"354\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>The establishment of supporting infrastructure, policy support, strong demand, and the curtain of the Internet bubble are slowly opened in these familiar logics.</b></p><p><b>Internet Queen and Netscape</b></p><p>Any industry has a representative figure and a representative company. Similar new energy vehicles must be Elon Musk and Tesla, mobile Internet is Jobs and Apple, and the Internet in the 1990s is no exception, but in fact<b>The representative companies are not IBM and Microsoft, but the entrance to the Internet-the browser company Netscape.</b></p><p>At the same time, in addition to entrepreneurs like Bezos, the iconic figures of the Internet bubble era,<b>Another important figure is Mary Meeker, an Internet analyst at Morgan Stanley. At The peak of The dot-com bubble, this woman was hailed as The same influence on Wall Street as Greenspan and Warren Buffett. She was well-deserved \"The Queen of. Net\".</b>And the masterpiece that made her famous in the first battle was, of course, a strong recommendation for Netscape.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3fed7803678e200af348447fb12500f1\" tg-width=\"461\" tg-height=\"397\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Mary graduated from DePauw University's psychology department in 1981, then joined Merrill Lynch as a stockbroker, and joined Solomon Brothers as a tech industry analyst after completing her MBA at Cornell University in 1986. At that time, her ideal was actually to become a fund manager. But fate probably knew she was better suited to be a seller, and she joined Morgan Stanley in 1991 as an analyst in the tech industry, starting a stellar career.</p><p>In 1995, four years after joining Morgan Stanley, she worked on Morgan Stanley's project, the IPO of the browser Netscape, which was a life-changing opportunity for her.<b>She also caught it and published a 300-page coverage report on Netscape. This 300-page report was so shocking in the 1990s when the Internet was not popular at that time, and it naturally became the bible for all investors to study the Internet.</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1d8330a01398b3dbdd1df47bc91533c3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"140\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>Her investment logic now looks like Netscape is the entrance to the Internet. With the popularity of personal computers, the Internet will enter thousands of households, while Netscape can make a profit by charging advertising fees, and the market space is huge. What a simple logic that now seems incredibly correct!</b></p><p>While<b>Netscape also lived up to expectations, surging 86% on its first day of listing, and surging more than 154% during the session. Less than a year and a half after the company's establishment, the company's founder Jim Clark's net worth reached more than $500 million</b>This browser company, which marks the entrance to the Internet, is similar to the interpretation that new energy vehicles regard Tesla as the entrance later, which can't help but be optimistic.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d5497d3b16b27d69747969fe2b687337\" tg-width=\"360\" tg-height=\"225\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Because of the success of Netscape, Mary has also become famous on Wall Street. Coupled with a large number of IPOs of Internet companies, Mary has become a real queen. In the era of less strict supervision, she will help investment banks screen projects. Therefore, Internet unlisted companies hope to get her favor, so that they can join the listing plan of investment banks. Because of the steady rise of Internet stocks,<b>She's like a touch of gold, and all the stocks she recommends are on a wild rise.</b></p><p>Further consolidating her position was in January 1997, when Bill Gurley, an analyst at Deutsche Morgan, issued a bearish report on Netscape, warning of the risks of Netscape, whose stock price was soaring, and downgraded Netscape to neutral. On that day, Netscape's stock price plummeted by 20%. Mary responded two days later by upgrading Netscape from Buy to Strong Buy.<b>And declared that \"if this company (Netscape) dies, it's Bill Gurley's fault\" (If this company dies, it's Bill Gurley's fault), Netscape The stock price regained ground in a few days.</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/85fcdd32f0f6efc6a8d6a9142d51e040\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"480\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>After blowing up the short Bill, nothing seems to stop Mary and Netscape,<b>At her peak, there were 26 Internet analysts working for Mary, and she covered 30 companies,</b>Despite such a huge team, all fund managers only want to see Mary alone, because she is the queen of the Internet. Even when she goes to some investment conferences, someone will say \"Look, that's Mary\".<b>She is no longer an analyst, but a star, someone who can really sway Wall Street.</b></p><p><b>Crazy market to bubble burst</b></p><p>Except for the Internet Queen, of course, the happiest ones are the startups in Silicon Valley. In the most prosperous time of Silicon Valley, Highway 101, which connects technology companies on both sides, is often stuck in traffic. Waiting in line for an hour or two when you go out for dinner, not finding a parking space at lunchtime, not booking a hotel when you come on a business trip, a large number of millionaires are born every day, and all graduates hope to create an Internet company to realize their dream of financial freedom.</p><p>In the process of bubble development, venture capital investment in the Internet is also soaring rapidly.<b>The amount of venture capital increased from $8 billion in 1990 to $100 billion in 2000. In 1999, 55 percent of venture capital projects were Internet projects. In 1999, there were more than 150 Internet IPO projects,</b>It can be described as a collective orgy.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e5481022453880d077f4a7bf0897d06\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"379\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>If you pay attention to the books describing the history at that time, you can find that if you don't invest in Internet companies in the investment community, you will be abandoned by the torrent of the times. During the Internet bubble period, companies like eBay rose more than 30 times. How can you outperform your peers if you don't invest? I also wrote such details in \"Hedge Fund Storms\",<b>In the investment salon, fund managers who didn't buy Internet companies faced ridicule and ridicule from their peers, doubts from customers and huge redemption pressure. Even Buffett was called an \"outdated person\" at that time.</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5645d1d043f967e134ea3bf9d1971d7e\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"282\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>In fact, in the process, we have seen the shadow of the bubble bursting. On March 10, 2000, the stock price of technology reached its peak, which was also the highest peak in the history of Nasdaq that year.<b>A hedge fund published a Burning Up article in Barron's in the United States. It surveyed 207 Internet companies and estimated that 51 Internet companies were running out of cash flow. At the rate of Burning at that time, almost all of them would not survive 12 months</b>Amazon is no exception, and almost at the same time, the stock market began to slide without warning, which may also show that the speed of burning money at that time has far exceeded the speed of user growth and income growth.</p><p><b>Then came the avalanche, after peaking on March 10, 2000, to the bottom of 2001, the Nasdaq fell more than 70%.</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/243dd9552f67ae1a2605d1b0f553b5c4\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"395\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>After the bubble burst: winners and losers</b></p><p>After the Internet bubble, for the Internet industry, a large number of layoffs and investment suspension are inevitable. Take the three major domestic portals and Ali at that time as examples, all of them encountered the dilemma of investment reduction and survival pressure. Many IT practitioners worried about unemployment from taking four or five offers before. After the bubble burst, from 2000 to 2002,<b>Almost 1,000 Internet companies closed down, more than 3,800 were merged, and most of the online celebrity companies at that time disappeared. Correspondingly, a large number of hedge funds with heavy Internet positions collapsed after the burst of the Internet bubble, and most of them were forgotten by history and became real losers.</b></p><p>It is worth mentioning that after the bubble burst, there was also a very dramatic situation, that is, Ravi Suria, an Indian analyst of Lehman Brothers, a big short bear on Amazon, appeared. He issued several reports that Amazon would go bankrupt. Is this situation very similar to Tesla's pessimistic target price of $10 by Morgan Stanley auto analysts in 2019? Of course, Morgan Stanley was still very smart to leave room, only lowering Tesla's pessimistic target price, while Ravi has been bearish. In 2002, Amazon's unexpected performance also directly blew Ravi, marking the bottom of Internet stocks.<b>Ravi has since left the seller and is now the investment director of hedge fund Valmiki Capital. He and Amazon may still be the post-bubble winners.</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e7e94edc17afefbefd17babf746a390d\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"336\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Mary, the queen of the Internet, still insisted on her OW (overweight) rating after Amazon and other stocks plummeted by 80%, and explained that people didn't understand the long-term logic of the Internet industry. Although she was greatly criticized, she still insisted on her own views. However, the companies she was most optimistic about, except Netscape, Amazon, eBay and Yahoo, all survived, and Mary regained her fame again in 2004 because she participated in Google's IPO. In 2010, Mary, who was already Managing Director, left Morgan Stanley and began to become a partner of Kleiner Perkins, a VC fund, to continue her Internet investment career. Later, she invested in bull stocks such as DocuSign and Square. At the same time, she also published annual Internet trend reports and continued to be known as \"Internet Queen\".<b>Historically, the Internet industry has also fulfilled her hypothesis. She should be regarded as the winner in the Internet bubble. Although she is not as dominant as before, she still continues to succeed in her career.</b></p><p>Her opponent Bill Gurley, despite being bearish on Netscape, is still a pioneer in Internet investment and participated in Amazon's IPO. After leaving the seller side, he started his investment career as a partner of VC Hummer Winlad, investing in<b>Including Uber and becoming a company director, his investment performance appears to be even more successful than Mary's.</b></p><p>Of course, after this bubble,<b>The only thing that hasn't changed is Warren Buffett, who wasn't involved in the whole process</b>Buffett is still the happy old man drinking Coke, who can still influence the whole Wall Street, and is not \"obsolete\" because he misses the Internet.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f53918f37649b1a6b887a6569322b1be\" tg-width=\"340\" tg-height=\"300\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>A little revelation</b></p><p>In fact, after this bubble, I think there are a few things to be sure:</p><p><ol><li><b>The bubble is definitely supported by its reasons and even fundamentals:</b>The strong economy of the United States, the popularity of PC and the support of policies are all hotbeds that bring the whole bubble. No bubble is a nonsense fantasy, and most of them are supported by strong fundamentals;</p><p></li><li><b>The logic of the Internet bubble is not wrong in the long run:</b>Judging from the subsequent human history and the development of the Internet, the logic of the Internet has been fulfilled, even far exceeding expectations, but we are too ahead of the development of the industry, similar to a kite. If we fly too high and too fast, the line will break, so<b>Don't think that if the industry has the right outlook, the high-speed growth bubble in the industry will certainly be digested without bursting.</b>Of course,<b>The burst of the bubble doesn't mean that this industry has been completely falsified. If people changed careers in 2001 because of the burst of the bubble, they may be a little regrettable;</b></p><p></li><li><b>The length and magnitude of the bubble can never be predicted:</b>In 1997, some analysts emptied Netscape. If you look at it later, it is actually right, but it turns out that this is too early, but it is completely wrong. It continues to consolidate the status of Mary, the goddess of the Internet, so don't easily guess the top. The bubble may be far more than you imagine.<b>The hedge fund that released a research report shorting the Internet in 2000 may just have the best luck;</b></p><p></li><li><b>Bubble bursts always happen unintentionally:</b>Although there are many so-called reasons that the bursting of the bubble is coming, you can't even find any specific events on the day of the crash, and the bubble suddenly burst, and the bubble burst as fast as it was when it rose, very much beyond expectations, and when you look back, you find that the financial reports of these companies are so fragile. Why did you believe that these companies could be worth so much money at that time?<b>Therefore, while keeping a drunk, be sure to keep a sober one.</b></p><p></li></ol>In short, we can find too many, too many similar stories, from the Japanese housing bubble, the Taiwan stock market bubble in the 1990s, to the Southeast Asian financial crisis in 1997 to the dot-com bubble and the financial crisis in' 08. Therefore, the bubble in the capital market is certain. The current Bitcoin, software SaaS and new energy vehicles may be more or less bubbles, but they are indeed the development direction, so the bubble is not a poison.</p><p><b>But if you can't understand these bubbles, either we are as determined as Buffett to ignore them at all, or we have to participate in them. Just always remember, don't be the last person to truly believe that bubbles or growth can last forever and buy them. After all, even if you are lucky enough, Amazon, which bought at a high level in 2000, was the last one to survive and develop the best. It will be 2007, seven years later, when it returned to the high point before the decline. Can you really resist not cutting meat in this process?</b></p>","source":"lsy1627904959798","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>From the Clinton Era: The Origin, Madness, and Burst of the Internet Bubble</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nFrom the Clinton Era: The Origin, Madness, and Burst of the Internet Bubble\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n<p class=\"head\">\n<strong class=\"h-name small\">张弢看世界</strong><span class=\"h-time small\">2021-08-02 19:48</span>\n</p>\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<p>Author: Zhang Tao</p><p>I remember once when I went to domestic Internet companies to research, I met an American fund manager in his 50s and chatted with him. Even in the US stocks dominated by FAANG, he only bought some profitable Internet companies, like Google Facebook, and even stocks like Amazon, he never bought them.<b>In fact, the reason is very simple. He is a person who has experienced the pain of the Internet bubble in 2000, or can never understand the Internet model of losing money first and then making profits.</b></p><p>Some people say that a fund manager will surely experience several crises in his career. Why do most American hedge funds last less than 20 years? Because most of The past 20 years have to overcome two hurdles, one is The Internet bubble in 2000 and The other is The financial crisis in 2008. There are many books and movies about The financial crisis, famous ones include The Big Short, Too Big to Fail, etc.<b>However, for the Internet bubble, in fact, there are very few such works, mainly because it is a bubble in a specific industry. After its burst, it did not have a huge impact on the whole global finance and economy, and the Internet later began to shine again, which seems to be a small episode.</b>But undoubtedly the story of the bursting of the dot-com bubble is brilliant enough. Maybe the internet prospered later, but those hedge funds that closed their doors because of the bursting of the bubble may be forgotten as the real losers.</p><p>Recently, I read some books and articles and did some research,<b>Write something as a summary and commemoration. After all, if we are still in this business, we must accompany or dance with the bubble, hoping to become the winner rather than the loser in the bubble.</b></p><p><b>Internet Industry Outbreak: The Best Footnote of the Golden Age of the 90s in the United States</b></p><p>After the end of the Cold War, the United States became the world's only superpower, Japan was in trouble after the bursting of the real estate bubble (also a bubble), and the world faced great changes. Clinton campaign lines<b>The famous \"Stupid, the problem is the economy!\" Allowed him to defeat then-President George H.W. Bush in 1992</b>He was elected the 42nd president of the United States, and the golden age of the 1990s kicked off.</p><p>The Clinton administration delivered on his campaign promises, coupled with the right time, the right place and the right people, the 1990s marked the peak of the U.S. economy after the 1960s,<b>GDP growth averaged 4.6 percent under Clinton, unemployment dropped from more than 7 percent in The 1980s to about 5 percent, and inflation dropped from 5.1 percent in The 1980s to an average of 2.6 percent in what has been described as The \"Fabulous Decade.\"</b>。</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/9e745eabc01a6647663ba9f4d727092b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"388\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>And in the technology industry,<b>In 1993, Clinton also unveiled the \"Agenda for Action\", the idea of establishing the National Information Infrastructure,</b>Familiar top-level design, familiar policy support, how this is like a story that's happening today, decades later.</p><p>Coupled with the success of personal computer companies such as IBM and Dell, personal computers began to become popular among the masses, and sales jumped.<b>The number of personal computers connected to the Internet increased from 310,000 in 1990 to 43.23 million in 2000, an increase of more than 130 times in 10 years, representing a compound growth of more than 60 percent,</b>What a surprising and familiar number again, and it seems that this number means that this buy can never be wrong.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/916155fbed3707499dc9384733188e43\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"354\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>The establishment of supporting infrastructure, policy support, strong demand, and the curtain of the Internet bubble are slowly opened in these familiar logics.</b></p><p><b>Internet Queen and Netscape</b></p><p>Any industry has a representative figure and a representative company. Similar new energy vehicles must be Elon Musk and Tesla, mobile Internet is Jobs and Apple, and the Internet in the 1990s is no exception, but in fact<b>The representative companies are not IBM and Microsoft, but the entrance to the Internet-the browser company Netscape.</b></p><p>At the same time, in addition to entrepreneurs like Bezos, the iconic figures of the Internet bubble era,<b>Another important figure is Mary Meeker, an Internet analyst at Morgan Stanley. At The peak of The dot-com bubble, this woman was hailed as The same influence on Wall Street as Greenspan and Warren Buffett. She was well-deserved \"The Queen of. Net\".</b>And the masterpiece that made her famous in the first battle was, of course, a strong recommendation for Netscape.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3fed7803678e200af348447fb12500f1\" tg-width=\"461\" tg-height=\"397\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Mary graduated from DePauw University's psychology department in 1981, then joined Merrill Lynch as a stockbroker, and joined Solomon Brothers as a tech industry analyst after completing her MBA at Cornell University in 1986. At that time, her ideal was actually to become a fund manager. But fate probably knew she was better suited to be a seller, and she joined Morgan Stanley in 1991 as an analyst in the tech industry, starting a stellar career.</p><p>In 1995, four years after joining Morgan Stanley, she worked on Morgan Stanley's project, the IPO of the browser Netscape, which was a life-changing opportunity for her.<b>She also caught it and published a 300-page coverage report on Netscape. This 300-page report was so shocking in the 1990s when the Internet was not popular at that time, and it naturally became the bible for all investors to study the Internet.</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/1d8330a01398b3dbdd1df47bc91533c3\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"140\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>Her investment logic now looks like Netscape is the entrance to the Internet. With the popularity of personal computers, the Internet will enter thousands of households, while Netscape can make a profit by charging advertising fees, and the market space is huge. What a simple logic that now seems incredibly correct!</b></p><p>While<b>Netscape also lived up to expectations, surging 86% on its first day of listing, and surging more than 154% during the session. Less than a year and a half after the company's establishment, the company's founder Jim Clark's net worth reached more than $500 million</b>This browser company, which marks the entrance to the Internet, is similar to the interpretation that new energy vehicles regard Tesla as the entrance later, which can't help but be optimistic.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d5497d3b16b27d69747969fe2b687337\" tg-width=\"360\" tg-height=\"225\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Because of the success of Netscape, Mary has also become famous on Wall Street. Coupled with a large number of IPOs of Internet companies, Mary has become a real queen. In the era of less strict supervision, she will help investment banks screen projects. Therefore, Internet unlisted companies hope to get her favor, so that they can join the listing plan of investment banks. Because of the steady rise of Internet stocks,<b>She's like a touch of gold, and all the stocks she recommends are on a wild rise.</b></p><p>Further consolidating her position was in January 1997, when Bill Gurley, an analyst at Deutsche Morgan, issued a bearish report on Netscape, warning of the risks of Netscape, whose stock price was soaring, and downgraded Netscape to neutral. On that day, Netscape's stock price plummeted by 20%. Mary responded two days later by upgrading Netscape from Buy to Strong Buy.<b>And declared that \"if this company (Netscape) dies, it's Bill Gurley's fault\" (If this company dies, it's Bill Gurley's fault), Netscape The stock price regained ground in a few days.</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/85fcdd32f0f6efc6a8d6a9142d51e040\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"480\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>After blowing up the short Bill, nothing seems to stop Mary and Netscape,<b>At her peak, there were 26 Internet analysts working for Mary, and she covered 30 companies,</b>Despite such a huge team, all fund managers only want to see Mary alone, because she is the queen of the Internet. Even when she goes to some investment conferences, someone will say \"Look, that's Mary\".<b>She is no longer an analyst, but a star, someone who can really sway Wall Street.</b></p><p><b>Crazy market to bubble burst</b></p><p>Except for the Internet Queen, of course, the happiest ones are the startups in Silicon Valley. In the most prosperous time of Silicon Valley, Highway 101, which connects technology companies on both sides, is often stuck in traffic. Waiting in line for an hour or two when you go out for dinner, not finding a parking space at lunchtime, not booking a hotel when you come on a business trip, a large number of millionaires are born every day, and all graduates hope to create an Internet company to realize their dream of financial freedom.</p><p>In the process of bubble development, venture capital investment in the Internet is also soaring rapidly.<b>The amount of venture capital increased from $8 billion in 1990 to $100 billion in 2000. In 1999, 55 percent of venture capital projects were Internet projects. In 1999, there were more than 150 Internet IPO projects,</b>It can be described as a collective orgy.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3e5481022453880d077f4a7bf0897d06\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"379\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>If you pay attention to the books describing the history at that time, you can find that if you don't invest in Internet companies in the investment community, you will be abandoned by the torrent of the times. During the Internet bubble period, companies like eBay rose more than 30 times. How can you outperform your peers if you don't invest? I also wrote such details in \"Hedge Fund Storms\",<b>In the investment salon, fund managers who didn't buy Internet companies faced ridicule and ridicule from their peers, doubts from customers and huge redemption pressure. Even Buffett was called an \"outdated person\" at that time.</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5645d1d043f967e134ea3bf9d1971d7e\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"282\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>In fact, in the process, we have seen the shadow of the bubble bursting. On March 10, 2000, the stock price of technology reached its peak, which was also the highest peak in the history of Nasdaq that year.<b>A hedge fund published a Burning Up article in Barron's in the United States. It surveyed 207 Internet companies and estimated that 51 Internet companies were running out of cash flow. At the rate of Burning at that time, almost all of them would not survive 12 months</b>Amazon is no exception, and almost at the same time, the stock market began to slide without warning, which may also show that the speed of burning money at that time has far exceeded the speed of user growth and income growth.</p><p><b>Then came the avalanche, after peaking on March 10, 2000, to the bottom of 2001, the Nasdaq fell more than 70%.</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/243dd9552f67ae1a2605d1b0f553b5c4\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"395\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>After the bubble burst: winners and losers</b></p><p>After the Internet bubble, for the Internet industry, a large number of layoffs and investment suspension are inevitable. Take the three major domestic portals and Ali at that time as examples, all of them encountered the dilemma of investment reduction and survival pressure. Many IT practitioners worried about unemployment from taking four or five offers before. After the bubble burst, from 2000 to 2002,<b>Almost 1,000 Internet companies closed down, more than 3,800 were merged, and most of the online celebrity companies at that time disappeared. Correspondingly, a large number of hedge funds with heavy Internet positions collapsed after the burst of the Internet bubble, and most of them were forgotten by history and became real losers.</b></p><p>It is worth mentioning that after the bubble burst, there was also a very dramatic situation, that is, Ravi Suria, an Indian analyst of Lehman Brothers, a big short bear on Amazon, appeared. He issued several reports that Amazon would go bankrupt. Is this situation very similar to Tesla's pessimistic target price of $10 by Morgan Stanley auto analysts in 2019? Of course, Morgan Stanley was still very smart to leave room, only lowering Tesla's pessimistic target price, while Ravi has been bearish. In 2002, Amazon's unexpected performance also directly blew Ravi, marking the bottom of Internet stocks.<b>Ravi has since left the seller and is now the investment director of hedge fund Valmiki Capital. He and Amazon may still be the post-bubble winners.</b></p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e7e94edc17afefbefd17babf746a390d\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"336\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p>Mary, the queen of the Internet, still insisted on her OW (overweight) rating after Amazon and other stocks plummeted by 80%, and explained that people didn't understand the long-term logic of the Internet industry. Although she was greatly criticized, she still insisted on her own views. However, the companies she was most optimistic about, except Netscape, Amazon, eBay and Yahoo, all survived, and Mary regained her fame again in 2004 because she participated in Google's IPO. In 2010, Mary, who was already Managing Director, left Morgan Stanley and began to become a partner of Kleiner Perkins, a VC fund, to continue her Internet investment career. Later, she invested in bull stocks such as DocuSign and Square. At the same time, she also published annual Internet trend reports and continued to be known as \"Internet Queen\".<b>Historically, the Internet industry has also fulfilled her hypothesis. She should be regarded as the winner in the Internet bubble. Although she is not as dominant as before, she still continues to succeed in her career.</b></p><p>Her opponent Bill Gurley, despite being bearish on Netscape, is still a pioneer in Internet investment and participated in Amazon's IPO. After leaving the seller side, he started his investment career as a partner of VC Hummer Winlad, investing in<b>Including Uber and becoming a company director, his investment performance appears to be even more successful than Mary's.</b></p><p>Of course, after this bubble,<b>The only thing that hasn't changed is Warren Buffett, who wasn't involved in the whole process</b>Buffett is still the happy old man drinking Coke, who can still influence the whole Wall Street, and is not \"obsolete\" because he misses the Internet.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/f53918f37649b1a6b887a6569322b1be\" tg-width=\"340\" tg-height=\"300\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"></p><p><b>A little revelation</b></p><p>In fact, after this bubble, I think there are a few things to be sure:</p><p><ol><li><b>The bubble is definitely supported by its reasons and even fundamentals:</b>The strong economy of the United States, the popularity of PC and the support of policies are all hotbeds that bring the whole bubble. No bubble is a nonsense fantasy, and most of them are supported by strong fundamentals;</p><p></li><li><b>The logic of the Internet bubble is not wrong in the long run:</b>Judging from the subsequent human history and the development of the Internet, the logic of the Internet has been fulfilled, even far exceeding expectations, but we are too ahead of the development of the industry, similar to a kite. If we fly too high and too fast, the line will break, so<b>Don't think that if the industry has the right outlook, the high-speed growth bubble in the industry will certainly be digested without bursting.</b>Of course,<b>The burst of the bubble doesn't mean that this industry has been completely falsified. If people changed careers in 2001 because of the burst of the bubble, they may be a little regrettable;</b></p><p></li><li><b>The length and magnitude of the bubble can never be predicted:</b>In 1997, some analysts emptied Netscape. If you look at it later, it is actually right, but it turns out that this is too early, but it is completely wrong. It continues to consolidate the status of Mary, the goddess of the Internet, so don't easily guess the top. The bubble may be far more than you imagine.<b>The hedge fund that released a research report shorting the Internet in 2000 may just have the best luck;</b></p><p></li><li><b>Bubble bursts always happen unintentionally:</b>Although there are many so-called reasons that the bursting of the bubble is coming, you can't even find any specific events on the day of the crash, and the bubble suddenly burst, and the bubble burst as fast as it was when it rose, very much beyond expectations, and when you look back, you find that the financial reports of these companies are so fragile. Why did you believe that these companies could be worth so much money at that time?<b>Therefore, while keeping a drunk, be sure to keep a sober one.</b></p><p></li></ol>In short, we can find too many, too many similar stories, from the Japanese housing bubble, the Taiwan stock market bubble in the 1990s, to the Southeast Asian financial crisis in 1997 to the dot-com bubble and the financial crisis in' 08. Therefore, the bubble in the capital market is certain. The current Bitcoin, software SaaS and new energy vehicles may be more or less bubbles, but they are indeed the development direction, so the bubble is not a poison.</p><p><b>But if you can't understand these bubbles, either we are as determined as Buffett to ignore them at all, or we have to participate in them. Just always remember, don't be the last person to truly believe that bubbles or growth can last forever and buy them. After all, even if you are lucky enough, Amazon, which bought at a high level in 2000, was the last one to survive and develop the best. It will be 2007, seven years later, when it returned to the high point before the decline. Can you really resist not cutting meat in this process?</b></p>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n<p> source:<a href=\"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3636920\">张弢看世界</a></p>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/d5a09f6f7446acea393f3f94370520cf","relate_stocks":{"QNET":"纳斯达克互联网指数"},"source_url":"https://wallstreetcn.com/articles/3636920","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1138385946","content_text":"作者:张弢\n我记得我有次去国内互联网公司调研的时候碰到一个50多岁的美国基金经理,和他聊了下,哪怕在FAANG支配的美股,他也只是买一些盈利的互联网公司,类似谷歌脸书这样,哪怕神如亚马逊这样的股票,他也从来没有买过,其实原因很简单,他是经历过2000年互联网泡沫伤痛的人,或者永远无法理解先亏损后盈利的互联网模式。\n有人说,一个基金经理一定会在自己职业生涯中经历好几次的危机,而为什么大部分美国对冲基金都超不过20年,因为过去20年大部分要迈过两个坎,一个是2000年互联网泡沫,一个是2008年金融危机,对于金融危机的书和电影有很多,著名的包括The Big Short, Too Big to Fail等等,但是对于互联网泡沫,其实这类作品很少,主要还是因为它是特定行业的泡沫,破灭之后并没有对于整个全球金融和经济产生巨大的影响,而且互联网后来又开始辉煌,这似乎是一个小插曲。但无疑互联网泡沫破灭的故事也足够精彩,也许互联网后来还是欣欣向荣,但那些因为泡沫破灭而关门的对冲基金们也许就被人所遗忘成为真正的输家。\n最近看了一些书和文章做了点研究,作为一个总结和纪念写点啥,毕竟我们如果还在这一行,一定与泡沫相伴或者共舞,希望能够成为泡沫里的赢家而不是输家。\n互联网行业爆发:美国90年代黄金时期的最好注脚\n冷战结束之后,美国成为了全球唯一超级大国,日本在房地产泡沫(也是个泡沫)破灭之后陷入了困境,世界面临巨变。克林顿竞选台词那个著名的 “笨蛋,问题是经济!” 让他在1992年击败了时任总统老布什,并且结束了共和党12年的执政当选为美国第42任总统,美国90年代的黄金年代拉开了序幕。\n克林顿执政时期兑现了他的竞选承诺,加上天时地利人和,上个世纪90年代是美国经济继20世纪60年代之后有一个高峰,克林顿执政时期美国GDP平均增速为4.6%,失业率从80年代的超过7%降低到5%左右,通胀也从20世纪80年代的平均5.1%降低到平均2.6%,那个时期被人成为“令人惊艳的十年”(The Fabulous Decade)。\n\n而在科技行业,1993年克林顿也公布了“行动议程”,建立美国国家信息基础设施(National Information Infrastructure)的构想,熟悉的顶层设计,熟悉的政策支持,这多么像几十年后的今天正在发生的故事。\n再加上IBM 和Dell等个人电脑公司的成功,个人电脑开始在大众中普及,销售量大涨,随着计算机的普及,接入互联网的个人计算机的数量从1990年的31万台增加到了2000年的4323万台,10年之间增加了130多倍,复合增长超过60%,又是个多么惊人而熟悉的数字,似乎这个数字就代表这买入永远都不会错误。\n\n配套基础设施的建立,政策的支持,强劲的需求,互联网泡沫的大幕就在这些熟悉的逻辑中徐徐拉开。\n互联网女皇和Netscape\n任何一个行业都有一个代表性的人物和一家代表性的公司,类似新能源汽车一定就是Elon Musk和特斯拉,移动互联网是乔布斯和苹果,而90年代互联网也不例外,但其实代表公司并不是IBM和微软,而是互联网的入口——浏览器公司Netscape(网景公司)。\n同时,互联网泡沫时代的标志人物除了类似Bezos这样的创业者以外,还有一个重要的人物就是Morgan Stanley的互联网分析师Mary Meeker,这个在互联网泡沫巅峰时期被誉为和格林斯潘、沃伦巴菲特一样可以左右华尔街的女人,是当之无愧的“The Queen of .Net”,而让她一战成名的代表作当然就是对Netscape的强烈推荐。\n\nMary在1981年毕业于DePauw大学的心理系,然后加入美林成为一个股票经纪人,在1986年康奈尔大学完成MBA之后加入所罗门兄弟公司成为一名科技行业分析师,当时她的理想实际是成为一名基金经理。但是命运可能知道她更适合做卖方,她于1991年加入Morgan Stanley成为科技行业的分析师,开始了辉煌的职业生涯。\n1995年在加入Morgan Stanley 4年之后,她参与了Morgan Stanley的项目——浏览器Netscape的IPO,这是改变她一生的机会,她也抓住了,并且发布了一篇关于Netscape 300页的覆盖报告,这个300页的报告在当时互联网并没有普及的90年代可想有多么震撼,也理所当然成为所有投资人研究互联网的圣经。\n\n她的投资逻辑现在看无非是Netscape是互联网的入口,随着个人电脑的普及,互联网会进入千家万户,而Netscape可以通过收取广告费而盈利,市场空间巨大。多么朴素而且现在看起来都无比正确的逻辑啊!\n而Netscape也不负众望,在上市首日大涨86%,盘中一度大涨超过154%,在公司成立还不到1年半之后,公司创始人Jim Clark的身家就达到了超过5亿美金,这个标志着互联网入口的浏览器公司就类似后来新能源汽车把特斯拉看作入口的解读一样,无法不让人看好。\n\n而因为Netscape的成功,Mary也在华尔街声名鹊起,加上大量的互联网公司的IPO,Mary成为了真正的女皇,在监管不那么严格的年代她会帮助投行甄别项目,互联网非上市公司也因此希望得到她的垂青,从而能够加入投行的上市计划,而因为互联网股票的节节高升,她就像是点石成金,所有她推荐的股票都在疯狂的上涨中。\n而进一步巩固她地位的是在1997年1月,Deutsche Morgan的分析师Bill Gurley发布了Netscape的看空报告,提示股价狂飙的Netscape的风险并将Netscape下调到中性评级,当天Netscape的股价大跌20%,而Mary在两天之后发出回应,将Netscape从Buy(买入)上调到Strong Buy(强力买入)评级,并且宣称“如果这个公司(Netscape)死了,那就是Bill Gurley的错”(If this company dies, it’s Bill Gurley's fault),Netscape股价几天之后就收复失地。\n\n在打爆空头Bill之后,似乎一切都无法阻挡Mary和Netscape,最巅峰时候,有26个互联网分析师为Mary工作,而她主要覆盖30个公司,尽管有如此庞大的团队,所有的基金经理只想见Mary一个人,因为她是那个互联网的女皇,甚至她去一些投资会议,会有人发出“看,那就是Mary”的感慨,她已经不是一个分析师,而是一个明星,真正可以左右华尔街的人。\n疯狂的市场到泡沫破灭\n除了互联网女皇,当然最开心的是硅谷的创业公司们,在硅谷最繁荣的时间,串联起两旁科技公司的101公路经常大堵车。出门吃饭排一两个小时的队,午饭时间找不到停车位,过来出差定不到旅馆,每天都有大量的百万富翁诞生,所有的毕业生都希望创立一家互联网公司实现财务自由的梦想。\n而在泡沫发展过程中,风险资本投资在互联网也是极速狂飙,风险投资额从1990年的80亿美金增长到2000年的1000亿美金,风险投资在1999年55%项目是互联网项目,1999年有超过150个互联网IPO项目,可谓是集体的狂欢。\n\n如果关注描述当时历史的书,就可以发现在投资界如果你不投互联网公司,你就会被时代洪流抛弃,在互联网泡沫时期,如eBay这样的公司涨幅超过30倍,你不投如何能跑赢同行。在《对冲基金风雨录》也写过这样的细节,在投资沙龙上,没有买互联网公司的基金经理面对同行的奚落和嘲讽,也面对客户的质疑和巨大的赎回压力,甚至巴菲特也在当时被为“过时的人”。\n\n而实际上,在过程中,已经看到了泡沫破灭的阴影,2000年3月10日,科技股价走上顶峰,也是当年纳斯达克的历史最高峰。一家对冲基金在美国《巴伦周刊》中发表了一篇Burning Up的文章,它调研了207家互联网公司,预估51家网络公司现金流面临枯竭,以当时的烧钱速度计算,几乎所有的公司都撑不过12个月,亚马逊也不例外,而几乎同时,股市开始在毫无征兆中滑落,这或许也说明当时烧钱速度已经远远超过用户增长的速度和收入的增长。\n随后就是雪崩,在2000年3月10日触顶之后到2001年底部,Nasdaq指数跌幅超过70%。\n\n泡沫破灭之后:赢家和输家\n互联网泡沫之后,对于互联网行业来说,大量的裁员和投资暂停是不可避免的,就拿国内当时的三大门户和阿里来说,都碰到了投资缩减的困境和生存压力,很多IT从业人员从之前手拿四五份offer到担心失业。泡沫破灭之后,从2000年到2002年,有差不多1000家互联网公司倒闭,超过3800家被兼并,绝大部分当时的网红公司都销声匿迹。与此相对应的,大量的重仓互联网的对冲基金在互联网泡沫破灭之后倒闭,他们大部分都被历史遗忘,成为真正的输家。\n值得一提的是,泡沫破灭之后也出现了非常戏剧化的局面,那就是出现了看空亚马逊的大空头雷曼兄弟的印度裔分析师Ravi Suria,他连发数篇报告认为亚马逊会破产,此情此景是否很像特斯拉在2019年的时候Morgan Stanley汽车分析师的10美金悲观目标价,当然Morgan Stanley还是很聪明的留了余地,只是将特斯拉悲观目标价下调,而Ravi则是一直看空,而2002年亚马逊超预期的业绩也直接打爆Ravi标志着互联网股票的触底,Ravi之后也离开卖方,现在是对冲基金Valmiki Capital的投资总监,他和亚马逊也许都还算是泡沫后的赢家。\n\n互联网女皇Mary则在亚马逊等股票大跌80%之后仍然坚持自己的OW(超配)评级,并且解释说人们并不理解互联网行业长期逻辑,虽然受到巨大非议,仍然坚持自己的看法,不过她最看好的公司,除了Netscape以外,Amazon,eBay和Yahoo都活了下来,而且Mary在2004年因为参与Google的IPO再次让她重获声名。2010年已是Managing Director(董事总经理)的Mary离开Morgan Stanley,开始成为VC基金Kleiner Perkins的合伙人继续互联网投资事业,后来她投资了DocuSign和Square这样的牛股,同时她也还是每年发布互联网的趋势报告继续以“互联网女皇”被人们所知。从历史来看,后面互联网行业也兑现了她的假设,她应该算是互联网泡沫里面的赢家,虽然不至于如当年那么呼风唤雨,但仍然继续事业的成功。\n她的对手Bill Gurley虽然看空了Netscape,但仍然是互联网投资的先锋并且参与了亚马逊的IPO,离开卖方之后开始了投资生涯,是VC Hummer Winlad的合伙人,投资了包括Uber并成为公司董事,他的投资业绩似乎比Mary还要成功。\n当然这次泡沫之后,唯一没有什么改变的就是全程没有参与的沃伦巴菲特,巴菲特还是那个喝着可乐的快乐老头,仍然可以左右整个华尔街,并没有因为错过互联网而“过时”。\n\n一点启示\n其实经过这个泡沫,我觉得有几点可以肯定:\n\n泡沫绝对有它诞生的理由甚至基本面的支撑:美国强劲的经济,PC的普及和政策的支持都是带来整个泡沫的温床,没有什么泡沫是无厘头的幻想,大部分有强劲的基本面支撑;\n互联网泡沫逻辑长期看并没有错:从后来人类历史和互联网发展来看,互联网逻辑都兑现了,甚至远远超过预期,只是我们太领先于行业的发展,类似于风筝,飞的太高太快,线就会断,所以不要认为行业前景正确行业高速增长泡沫就肯定能被消化而不会破灭。当然,泡沫破灭也不代表这个行业完全被证伪,如果在2001年因为泡沫破灭转行的人,可能多少会有点遗憾;\n泡沫的长度和幅度永远无法预测:在1997年就有分析师唱空Netscape,如果后面来看其实是对的,但事实证明这个实在太早,反而大错特错,继续巩固了互联网女神Mary的江湖地位,所以不要去轻易猜顶,泡沫幅度也许远远超过想象,那家在2000年发布调研报告做空互联网的对冲基金也许只是运气最好的那个而已;\n泡沫破灭总是不经意间发生的:虽然可以找到很多所谓的原因,证明泡沫的破灭即将到来,但在大跌当天你甚至找不到任何具体事件,泡沫就突然破灭了,而泡沫破灭速度之快如同上涨时候一样非常超预期,而回头看才发现这些公司的财报是如此的脆弱,当时为什么会相信这些公司可以值这么多钱,所以留一份醉的同时,一定要留一份清醒。\n\n总之,我们可以找到太多太多类似的故事,从日本房地产泡沫,90年代台湾股市泡沫,到97年的东南亚金融危机到互联网泡沫以及08年金融危机。所以资本市场里泡沫是一定的,现在的比特币、软件SaaS、新能源汽车也许也是或多或少的泡沫,但他们也确实是发展方向,所以泡沫并非毒药,\n但如果无法理解这些泡沫,要么我们和巴菲特一样有定力完全不管,要么我们也不得不参与其中,只是永远要记住,不要成为真正相信泡沫或者增长可以永远持续而最后一个买入的人,毕竟就算你足够足够幸运,在2000年高位买入的是最后活下来并且发展最好的亚马逊,回到下跌前的高点也是7年之后的2007年了,你真的能够抗住不在这个过程中割肉吗?","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"QNET":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2186,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":314541405,"gmtCreate":1612364186707,"gmtModify":1704870270384,"author":{"id":"3567665939928011","authorId":"3567665939928011","name":"seraph2020","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3391e117ae079b90cb54b08eec39043","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3567665939928011","idStr":"3567665939928011"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"……","listText":"……","text":"……","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/314541405","repostId":"314818962","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":314818962,"gmtCreate":1612330654052,"gmtModify":1704869804059,"author":{"id":"3514329116425907","authorId":"3514329116425907","name":"小虎AV","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/91101bd3142b32495c3131036d5f8afa","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3514329116425907","idStr":"3514329116425907"},"themes":[],"title":"視頻|“女股神”木頭姐如何看待WSB事件?","htmlText":"\n \n \n 昨夜ARK ETF的創始人凱西·伍德接受雅虎財經節目採訪討論了她對Reddit、GameStop、潛在的債券泡沫和賣空者的看法。本期視頻精彩要點如下: Cathie Wood認爲千禧一代(90-00後)比嬰兒潮一代(80後)對股票更感興趣,這也是促成Reddit上形成 WSB效應的一些因素, 她一直都在關注WSB事件,在她看來WSB抱團做多現象是積極的,對股票市場和加密貨幣市場都有積極影響。 她認爲對衝基金在其中並不完全無辜,一個有趣的事情是對衝基金實際上是在協助和教唆這一現象。 WSB導致一些經營困難的公司債券價格提升,AMC是其中典型債券價格已經翻了三倍。 以ARK投資特斯拉爲例,此前埃隆·馬斯克曾嘗試將特斯拉私有化,導致股價大跌,2019年的時候特斯拉股價大跌,市場上看空的聲音很多,但是ARK堅定買入並長期看多特斯拉。後來2020年特斯拉股價大漲,ARK獲利頗豐,到今天,特斯拉依然是ARK最典型的一項投資。 她認爲這輪做空,除對衝基金以外,也有散戶投資者參與其中。現在WSB股票的波動已經到了一種離譜的情況,她會繼續關注下去看是什麼樣的收場。 WSB的最大受益方是銀行,而最終的參與者可能會損失慘重。 關於債券泡沫也值得大家關注,具體貌似沒有深入聊[吃瓜]後面是主持人聊天,沒啥意思,我就不翻了,大家看視頻吧,我繼續幹飯了[真香] 事先聲明:如果翻譯有錯,都是字幕軟件的鍋[正經]爲了提高準確率,這期我都是照着字幕軟件提取的英文翻譯成中字的[流淚]關於ARK Invest介紹:ARK 可以說是特斯拉最著名的多頭支持者之一,並且一直維持對特斯拉的最樂觀長期目標價。ARK Invest 也是極少數能考慮到特斯拉在自動駕駛、全自動駕駛套件,及埃隆·馬斯克 (Elon Musk) 計劃推出的共享出行服務 (Robotaxi net\n \n","listText":"昨夜ARK ETF的創始人凱西·伍德接受雅虎財經節目採訪討論了她對Reddit、GameStop、潛在的債券泡沫和賣空者的看法。本期視頻精彩要點如下: Cathie Wood認爲千禧一代(90-00後)比嬰兒潮一代(80後)對股票更感興趣,這也是促成Reddit上形成 WSB效應的一些因素, 她一直都在關注WSB事件,在她看來WSB抱團做多現象是積極的,對股票市場和加密貨幣市場都有積極影響。 她認爲對衝基金在其中並不完全無辜,一個有趣的事情是對衝基金實際上是在協助和教唆這一現象。 WSB導致一些經營困難的公司債券價格提升,AMC是其中典型債券價格已經翻了三倍。 以ARK投資特斯拉爲例,此前埃隆·馬斯克曾嘗試將特斯拉私有化,導致股價大跌,2019年的時候特斯拉股價大跌,市場上看空的聲音很多,但是ARK堅定買入並長期看多特斯拉。後來2020年特斯拉股價大漲,ARK獲利頗豐,到今天,特斯拉依然是ARK最典型的一項投資。 她認爲這輪做空,除對衝基金以外,也有散戶投資者參與其中。現在WSB股票的波動已經到了一種離譜的情況,她會繼續關注下去看是什麼樣的收場。 WSB的最大受益方是銀行,而最終的參與者可能會損失慘重。 關於債券泡沫也值得大家關注,具體貌似沒有深入聊[吃瓜]後面是主持人聊天,沒啥意思,我就不翻了,大家看視頻吧,我繼續幹飯了[真香] 事先聲明:如果翻譯有錯,都是字幕軟件的鍋[正經]爲了提高準確率,這期我都是照着字幕軟件提取的英文翻譯成中字的[流淚]關於ARK Invest介紹:ARK 可以說是特斯拉最著名的多頭支持者之一,並且一直維持對特斯拉的最樂觀長期目標價。ARK Invest 也是極少數能考慮到特斯拉在自動駕駛、全自動駕駛套件,及埃隆·馬斯克 (Elon Musk) 計劃推出的共享出行服務 (Robotaxi net","text":"昨夜ARK ETF的創始人凱西·伍德接受雅虎財經節目採訪討論了她對Reddit、GameStop、潛在的債券泡沫和賣空者的看法。本期視頻精彩要點如下: Cathie Wood認爲千禧一代(90-00後)比嬰兒潮一代(80後)對股票更感興趣,這也是促成Reddit上形成 WSB效應的一些因素, 她一直都在關注WSB事件,在她看來WSB抱團做多現象是積極的,對股票市場和加密貨幣市場都有積極影響。 她認爲對衝基金在其中並不完全無辜,一個有趣的事情是對衝基金實際上是在協助和教唆這一現象。 WSB導致一些經營困難的公司債券價格提升,AMC是其中典型債券價格已經翻了三倍。 以ARK投資特斯拉爲例,此前埃隆·馬斯克曾嘗試將特斯拉私有化,導致股價大跌,2019年的時候特斯拉股價大跌,市場上看空的聲音很多,但是ARK堅定買入並長期看多特斯拉。後來2020年特斯拉股價大漲,ARK獲利頗豐,到今天,特斯拉依然是ARK最典型的一項投資。 她認爲這輪做空,除對衝基金以外,也有散戶投資者參與其中。現在WSB股票的波動已經到了一種離譜的情況,她會繼續關注下去看是什麼樣的收場。 WSB的最大受益方是銀行,而最終的參與者可能會損失慘重。 關於債券泡沫也值得大家關注,具體貌似沒有深入聊[吃瓜]後面是主持人聊天,沒啥意思,我就不翻了,大家看視頻吧,我繼續幹飯了[真香] 事先聲明:如果翻譯有錯,都是字幕軟件的鍋[正經]爲了提高準確率,這期我都是照着字幕軟件提取的英文翻譯成中字的[流淚]關於ARK Invest介紹:ARK 可以說是特斯拉最著名的多頭支持者之一,並且一直維持對特斯拉的最樂觀長期目標價。ARK Invest 也是極少數能考慮到特斯拉在自動駕駛、全自動駕駛套件,及埃隆·馬斯克 (Elon Musk) 計劃推出的共享出行服務 (Robotaxi net","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/314818962","isVote":1,"tweetType":2,"object":{"id":"a971d82ac9b743ada2fe945038ce6e84","tweetId":"314818962","videoUrl":"https://1254107296.vod2.myqcloud.com/27e1f7ecvodtransgzp1254107296/2585544c5285890813677347121/v.f30.mp4","poster":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/316326daf727020111951106780844fe"},"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2237,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":316658138,"gmtCreate":1611931731224,"gmtModify":1704866148648,"author":{"id":"3567665939928011","authorId":"3567665939928011","name":"seraph2020","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3391e117ae079b90cb54b08eec39043","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3567665939928011","idStr":"3567665939928011"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/316658138","repostId":"316320053","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":316320053,"gmtCreate":1611916856272,"gmtModify":1704865743383,"author":{"id":"3451551789721456","authorId":"3451551789721456","name":"三思期权","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/92ce49aa82ca7a11be1af4fd293beba8","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3451551789721456","idStr":"3451551789721456"},"themes":[],"title":"空頭節節敗退,散戶即將迎來終局之戰","htmlText":"本文首發於公衆號:三思期權 感謝大家對我們上一篇文章<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/TW/313256601\" target=\"_blank\">《散戶如何用期權拉爆百億美元對衝基金》</a>的喜愛。我們雖然熬夜逐字逐句修改文章,推敲邏輯,最後被大家認可讓我們非常感動。感謝那些打賞,點贊,轉發,給我們留言鼓勵的讀者。另外,我們也收到了非常多的讀者留言,希望我們跟蹤事態的發展,那我們就繼續熬一個夜,爲大家奉上最新的事態發展。 昨夜GME的多空爭奪進入了白熱化。股價盤後從147離譜的跳漲到215,誰知道今天更是被被拉到375。短短三天之內這個本已經處於高位的股票又被拉昇了三倍。 週二GME股票的交易量達到200億美金,小小的一個線下游戲股交易額竟然超過了蘋果特斯拉!爲什麼今天漲幅這麼高,交易量這麼大?今天誰又賺錢了?誰又爆倉了? 1. 多頭增援 從昨天截稿之後,讓市場意想不到的是多頭竟然出現了重量級的支援。Chamath Palihapitiya 在推特上宣佈買入5萬張行權價爲$115的2月看漲合約之後,燃爆了原本已經非常亢奮的WSB。 這位Chamath是一位斯里蘭卡裔的美籍投資人,作爲臉書的早期員工,2021年離開時已經完成了人生小目標。隨後建立了自己的風投公司,做的也是風生水起,連中幾個獨角獸! 除此之外,他2012年就買3百萬美金的比特幣,隨後也重倉買入特斯拉,並在CNBC上公開懟當時就在做空的Jim Chanos(這位對衝基金Kynikos的創始人,在做空特斯拉5年後,平了股票空頭,慘敗收場,目前只買看跌期權,謹慎做空)。可見他對比特幣空頭,股票空頭早就有了深深的偏見。他重度參與多個SPAC(Special Purpose Acquisation Company 特殊目的收購公司)也是飽受爭議。 多了個有資歷,有聲望,有米的眼光獨到的成功投資人的","listText":"本文首發於公衆號:三思期權 感謝大家對我們上一篇文章<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/TW/313256601\" target=\"_blank\">《散戶如何用期權拉爆百億美元對衝基金》</a>的喜愛。我們雖然熬夜逐字逐句修改文章,推敲邏輯,最後被大家認可讓我們非常感動。感謝那些打賞,點贊,轉發,給我們留言鼓勵的讀者。另外,我們也收到了非常多的讀者留言,希望我們跟蹤事態的發展,那我們就繼續熬一個夜,爲大家奉上最新的事態發展。 昨夜GME的多空爭奪進入了白熱化。股價盤後從147離譜的跳漲到215,誰知道今天更是被被拉到375。短短三天之內這個本已經處於高位的股票又被拉昇了三倍。 週二GME股票的交易量達到200億美金,小小的一個線下游戲股交易額竟然超過了蘋果特斯拉!爲什麼今天漲幅這麼高,交易量這麼大?今天誰又賺錢了?誰又爆倉了? 1. 多頭增援 從昨天截稿之後,讓市場意想不到的是多頭竟然出現了重量級的支援。Chamath Palihapitiya 在推特上宣佈買入5萬張行權價爲$115的2月看漲合約之後,燃爆了原本已經非常亢奮的WSB。 這位Chamath是一位斯里蘭卡裔的美籍投資人,作爲臉書的早期員工,2021年離開時已經完成了人生小目標。隨後建立了自己的風投公司,做的也是風生水起,連中幾個獨角獸! 除此之外,他2012年就買3百萬美金的比特幣,隨後也重倉買入特斯拉,並在CNBC上公開懟當時就在做空的Jim Chanos(這位對衝基金Kynikos的創始人,在做空特斯拉5年後,平了股票空頭,慘敗收場,目前只買看跌期權,謹慎做空)。可見他對比特幣空頭,股票空頭早就有了深深的偏見。他重度參與多個SPAC(Special Purpose Acquisation Company 特殊目的收購公司)也是飽受爭議。 多了個有資歷,有聲望,有米的眼光獨到的成功投資人的","text":"本文首發於公衆號:三思期權 感謝大家對我們上一篇文章《散戶如何用期權拉爆百億美元對衝基金》的喜愛。我們雖然熬夜逐字逐句修改文章,推敲邏輯,最後被大家認可讓我們非常感動。感謝那些打賞,點贊,轉發,給我們留言鼓勵的讀者。另外,我們也收到了非常多的讀者留言,希望我們跟蹤事態的發展,那我們就繼續熬一個夜,爲大家奉上最新的事態發展。 昨夜GME的多空爭奪進入了白熱化。股價盤後從147離譜的跳漲到215,誰知道今天更是被被拉到375。短短三天之內這個本已經處於高位的股票又被拉昇了三倍。 週二GME股票的交易量達到200億美金,小小的一個線下游戲股交易額竟然超過了蘋果特斯拉!爲什麼今天漲幅這麼高,交易量這麼大?今天誰又賺錢了?誰又爆倉了? 1. 多頭增援 從昨天截稿之後,讓市場意想不到的是多頭竟然出現了重量級的支援。Chamath Palihapitiya 在推特上宣佈買入5萬張行權價爲$115的2月看漲合約之後,燃爆了原本已經非常亢奮的WSB。 這位Chamath是一位斯里蘭卡裔的美籍投資人,作爲臉書的早期員工,2021年離開時已經完成了人生小目標。隨後建立了自己的風投公司,做的也是風生水起,連中幾個獨角獸! 除此之外,他2012年就買3百萬美金的比特幣,隨後也重倉買入特斯拉,並在CNBC上公開懟當時就在做空的Jim Chanos(這位對衝基金Kynikos的創始人,在做空特斯拉5年後,平了股票空頭,慘敗收場,目前只買看跌期權,謹慎做空)。可見他對比特幣空頭,股票空頭早就有了深深的偏見。他重度參與多個SPAC(Special Purpose Acquisation Company 特殊目的收購公司)也是飽受爭議。 多了個有資歷,有聲望,有米的眼光獨到的成功投資人的","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/092a3ca18a2138419802590530a1e0a1","width":"485","height":"402"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ffbc899a3966bf31234982e91a7f7658","width":"742","height":"473"},{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/060d3acdd2e367be4278c52a1bc4cf4d","width":"933","height":"616"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/316320053","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":9,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2347,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":332989896,"gmtCreate":1610274534515,"gmtModify":1704982825075,"author":{"id":"3567665939928011","authorId":"3567665939928011","name":"seraph2020","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3391e117ae079b90cb54b08eec39043","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3567665939928011","idStr":"3567665939928011"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"?","listText":"?","text":"?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/332989896","repostId":"338504310","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":338504310,"gmtCreate":1609927451125,"gmtModify":1704980896878,"author":{"id":"3569899433800417","authorId":"3569899433800417","name":"Alan聊特斯拉","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e551c513d687d0c7013cce40c61bdb7a","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3569899433800417","idStr":"3569899433800417"},"themes":[],"title":"","htmlText":"\n \n \n Vincent 採訪濃縮版,上調目標價810,新高還能買?\n \n","listText":"Vincent 採訪濃縮版,上調目標價810,新高還能買?","text":"Vincent 採訪濃縮版,上調目標價810,新高還能買?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/338504310","isVote":1,"tweetType":2,"object":{"id":"bf6137a68c084cec92a620bc2fe84e75","tweetId":"338504310","title":"$750 还能买吗?大摩上调目标价$810, Vincent 采访浓缩版,Model Y 毛利30%代表啥","videoUrl":"http://v.tigerbbs.com/160992744743159389732b2d783d19083a59c200b16b1.mp4","poster":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e00f315ebb30a26b4866d197c14e9e17","shareLink":"http://v.tigerbbs.com/160992744743159389732b2d783d19083a59c200b16b1.mp4"},"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2426,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":336644632,"gmtCreate":1610096725626,"gmtModify":1704982087619,"author":{"id":"3567665939928011","authorId":"3567665939928011","name":"seraph2020","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/a3391e117ae079b90cb54b08eec39043","crmLevel":11,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3567665939928011","idStr":"3567665939928011"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nice","listText":"Nice","text":"Nice","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/336644632","repostId":"338869660","repostType":1,"repost":{"id":338869660,"gmtCreate":1609864391250,"gmtModify":1704980558721,"author":{"id":"3555926517215344","authorId":"3555926517215344","name":"走马财经","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e421cf207f1b9b3827a49f1d17bead5a","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3555926517215344","idStr":"3555926517215344"},"themes":[],"title":"馬斯克:我的房子賣給了中國人 未來想葬在火星(上)","htmlText":"近日,Business Insider雜誌母公司Axel Springer的首席執行官Mathias Döpfner與<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$特斯拉(TSLA)$</a> CEO埃隆·馬斯克(Elon Musk)會面,討論了爲什麼馬斯克的電動汽車公司會走在無人駕駛汽車革命的最前沿,以及他開啓太空探索的雄心壯志。由於老虎發文限制在10000字以內,本文全文16000字,所以只能分上下兩篇發出。這次採訪中,馬斯克談到了很多領域,觀點一如既往的犀利。*談新冠病毒,他認爲醫學的未來是mRNA,基本上你可以用mRNA治癒一切,它就像一個計算機程序,你可以對它進行編程以執行所需的任何操作。你實際上可以變成一隻蝴蝶。*談競爭,他說特斯拉的目標是加速可持續能源時代的到來,不在於建立護城河之類的東西。特斯拉將向其它公司提供自動駕駛技術許可,幫助它們做正確的事。*談收購,他說特斯拉不想發起敵意收購。如果其它公司找過來,那麼我們也會考慮。*談銷售目標,他說特斯拉未來10年的目標是每年賣出2000萬輛車。*談自動駕駛,他說我非常有信心特斯拉明年將達到L5級,100%。*談財富,他說我賣掉了幾乎所有的房產,只爲了更專注於實現人生目標,他租房住,有時睡工廠裏。*而他最重要的目標之一,就是幫助人類成爲跨星球物種,幫助人類從地球文明跨越到太空文明,所以SpaceX至關重要。以下是訪談全文實錄。Mathias Döpfner:睿智的德國政治家Wolfgang Schauble曾說:“如果我們的憲法中有一條底線,那就是人的尊嚴。這是神聖不可侵犯的。但這並不意味着我們可以避開死亡。”馬斯克:是的,每個人都會死。Döpfner:每個人都會死,但是尊嚴是應該被保護的,即使是在新冠時期。在被感染期間,你是否改變了對病毒的看法?","listText":"近日,Business Insider雜誌母公司Axel Springer的首席執行官Mathias Döpfner與<a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">$特斯拉(TSLA)$</a> CEO埃隆·馬斯克(Elon Musk)會面,討論了爲什麼馬斯克的電動汽車公司會走在無人駕駛汽車革命的最前沿,以及他開啓太空探索的雄心壯志。由於老虎發文限制在10000字以內,本文全文16000字,所以只能分上下兩篇發出。這次採訪中,馬斯克談到了很多領域,觀點一如既往的犀利。*談新冠病毒,他認爲醫學的未來是mRNA,基本上你可以用mRNA治癒一切,它就像一個計算機程序,你可以對它進行編程以執行所需的任何操作。你實際上可以變成一隻蝴蝶。*談競爭,他說特斯拉的目標是加速可持續能源時代的到來,不在於建立護城河之類的東西。特斯拉將向其它公司提供自動駕駛技術許可,幫助它們做正確的事。*談收購,他說特斯拉不想發起敵意收購。如果其它公司找過來,那麼我們也會考慮。*談銷售目標,他說特斯拉未來10年的目標是每年賣出2000萬輛車。*談自動駕駛,他說我非常有信心特斯拉明年將達到L5級,100%。*談財富,他說我賣掉了幾乎所有的房產,只爲了更專注於實現人生目標,他租房住,有時睡工廠裏。*而他最重要的目標之一,就是幫助人類成爲跨星球物種,幫助人類從地球文明跨越到太空文明,所以SpaceX至關重要。以下是訪談全文實錄。Mathias Döpfner:睿智的德國政治家Wolfgang Schauble曾說:“如果我們的憲法中有一條底線,那就是人的尊嚴。這是神聖不可侵犯的。但這並不意味着我們可以避開死亡。”馬斯克:是的,每個人都會死。Döpfner:每個人都會死,但是尊嚴是應該被保護的,即使是在新冠時期。在被感染期間,你是否改變了對病毒的看法?","text":"近日,Business Insider雜誌母公司Axel Springer的首席執行官Mathias Döpfner與$特斯拉(TSLA)$ CEO埃隆·馬斯克(Elon Musk)會面,討論了爲什麼馬斯克的電動汽車公司會走在無人駕駛汽車革命的最前沿,以及他開啓太空探索的雄心壯志。由於老虎發文限制在10000字以內,本文全文16000字,所以只能分上下兩篇發出。這次採訪中,馬斯克談到了很多領域,觀點一如既往的犀利。*談新冠病毒,他認爲醫學的未來是mRNA,基本上你可以用mRNA治癒一切,它就像一個計算機程序,你可以對它進行編程以執行所需的任何操作。你實際上可以變成一隻蝴蝶。*談競爭,他說特斯拉的目標是加速可持續能源時代的到來,不在於建立護城河之類的東西。特斯拉將向其它公司提供自動駕駛技術許可,幫助它們做正確的事。*談收購,他說特斯拉不想發起敵意收購。如果其它公司找過來,那麼我們也會考慮。*談銷售目標,他說特斯拉未來10年的目標是每年賣出2000萬輛車。*談自動駕駛,他說我非常有信心特斯拉明年將達到L5級,100%。*談財富,他說我賣掉了幾乎所有的房產,只爲了更專注於實現人生目標,他租房住,有時睡工廠裏。*而他最重要的目標之一,就是幫助人類成爲跨星球物種,幫助人類從地球文明跨越到太空文明,所以SpaceX至關重要。以下是訪談全文實錄。Mathias Döpfner:睿智的德國政治家Wolfgang Schauble曾說:“如果我們的憲法中有一條底線,那就是人的尊嚴。這是神聖不可侵犯的。但這並不意味着我們可以避開死亡。”馬斯克:是的,每個人都會死。Döpfner:每個人都會死,但是尊嚴是應該被保護的,即使是在新冠時期。在被感染期間,你是否改變了對病毒的看法?","images":[{"img":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/58db2eff098cbcad9314e7898bec7c35","width":"688","height":"450"}],"top":1,"highlighted":2,"essential":2,"paper":2,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/338869660","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":0,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":2,"langContent":"CN","totalScore":0},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":2477,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":true}