Profile - To The Moon

Chonky

Posts · 416Posts · 416
Following · 0Following · 0
Followers · 0Followers · 0

- ChonkyChonky
  ·2022-11-09
  Ok
  Sorry, this post has been deleted
  425 Comment
  3
  Share
  Report
- ChonkyChonky
  ·2022-09-03
  Tell me your opinion about this news...
  Sorry, this post has been deleted
  545 Comment
  1
  Share
  Report
- ChonkyChonky
  ·2022-09-03
  Like please
  SOXL: Buying A Potential Bounce In Semiconductors
  SummarySOXL has been destroyed in just the past week, ceding a third of its value.The long-term outl
  SOXL: Buying A Potential Bounce In Semiconductors
  707 Comment
  5
  Share
  Report
- ChonkyChonky
  ·2022-08-11
  Like
  Sorry, this post has been deleted
  816 Comment
  4
  Share
  Report
- ChonkyChonky
  ·2022-08-10
  Like
  Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF: The Best Offense Is Defense
  SummaryWith a 30-day SEC yield of only 2.89%, Vanguard's High Dividend Yield ETF doesn't offer what many investors would consider to be a "high dividend yield".However, the fund's "value" oriented por
  Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF: The Best Offense Is Defense
  660 Comment
  4
  Share
  Report
- ChonkyChonky
  ·2022-08-08
  Like please
  Sorry, this post has been deleted
  425 Comment
  Like
  Share
  Report
- ChonkyChonky
  ·2022-08-04
  K
  3 Nasdaq 100 Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist in August
  The growth-centric Nasdaq 100 is home to three widely owned stocks that are cheaper than they've ever been.
  3 Nasdaq 100 Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist in August
  680 Comment
  3
  Share
  Report
- ChonkyChonky
  ·2022-08-02
  Like
  3 Stocks to Avoid This Week
  These investments seem pretty vulnerable right now.
  3 Stocks to Avoid This Week
  976 Comment
  2
  Share
  Report
- ChonkyChonky
  ·2022-08-01
  Like
  What’s in Store for Commodities After Losses in July?
  Wheat, oil prices decline for the month, but natural gas stages a rallyA farmer watches his burning
  What’s in Store for Commodities After Losses in July?
  336 Comment
  2
  Share
  Report
- ChonkyChonky
  ·2022-07-31
  Like
  Elon Musk Files Response and Counterclaims to Twitter Lawsuit Over $44 Billion Deal
  Elon Musk formally responded to Twitter Inc.'s lawsuit seeking to force him to go through with his $
  Elon Musk Files Response and Counterclaims to Twitter Lawsuit Over $44 Billion Deal
  433 Comment
  3
  Share
  Report

Most Discussed

Terms and Conditions·Privacy Policy

Company: TTMF Limited. Tech supported by Xiangshang Yixin.

Email：uservice@ttm.financial

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"3581920930646755","uuid":"3581920930646755","gmtCreate":1618842911577,"gmtModify":1704447495823,"name":"Chonky","pinyin":"chonky","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b26c78fb11a9e646bce483ea1b0d6f3","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":18,"headSize":121,"tweetSize":416,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":4,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖（非转发）","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"success","userBadges":[{"badgeId":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493-2","templateUuid":"1026c425416b44e0aac28c11a0848493","name":"Senior Tiger","description":"Join the tiger community for 1000 days","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0063fb68ea29c9ae6858c58630e182d5","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/96c699a93be4214d4b49aea6a5a5d1a4","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/35b0e542a9ff77046ed69ef602bc105d","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2024.01.15","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1001},{"badgeId":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84-1","templateUuid":"a83d7582f45846ffbccbce770ce65d84","name":"Real Trader","description":"Completed a transaction","bigImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2e08a1cc2087a1de93402c2c290fa65b","smallImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4504a6397ce1137932d56e5f4ce27166","grayImgUrl":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/4b22c79415b4cd6e3d8ebc4a0fa32604","redirectLinkEnabled":0,"redirectLink":null,"hasAllocated":1,"isWearing":0,"stamp":null,"stampPosition":0,"hasStamp":0,"allocationCount":1,"allocatedDate":"2021.12.21","exceedPercentage":null,"individualDisplayEnabled":0,"backgroundColor":null,"fontColor":null,"individualDisplaySort":0,"categoryType":1100}],"userBadgeCount":2,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":9987250182,"gmtCreate":1667929500246,"gmtModify":1676537985820,"author":{"id":"3581920930646755","authorId":"3581920930646755","name":"Chonky","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b26c78fb11a9e646bce483ea1b0d6f3","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581920930646755","idStr":"3581920930646755"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Ok","listText":"Ok","text":"Ok","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9987250182","repostId":"1172115977","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":425,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9939541905,"gmtCreate":1662145154808,"gmtModify":1676537006455,"author":{"id":"3581920930646755","authorId":"3581920930646755","name":"Chonky","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b26c78fb11a9e646bce483ea1b0d6f3","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581920930646755","idStr":"3581920930646755"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","listText":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","text":"Tell me your opinion about this news...","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9939541905","repostId":"1190582229","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":545,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9939541029,"gmtCreate":1662145148262,"gmtModify":1676537006448,"author":{"id":"3581920930646755","authorId":"3581920930646755","name":"Chonky","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b26c78fb11a9e646bce483ea1b0d6f3","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581920930646755","idStr":"3581920930646755"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like please","listText":"Like please","text":"Like please","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":5,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9939541029","repostId":"1190582229","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1190582229","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1662132812,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1190582229?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-09-02 23:33","market":"other","language":"en","title":"SOXL: Buying A Potential Bounce In Semiconductors","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1190582229","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummarySOXL has been destroyed in just the past week, ceding a third of its value.The long-term outl","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Summary</p><ul><li>SOXL has been destroyed in just the past week, ceding a third of its value.</li><li>The long-term outlook for semis remains strong but faces headwinds near term.</li><li>SOXL is very oversold and looks ready to bounce.</li></ul><p>The latest selling episode in the markets - which feels like about the 900th such episode this year - has crushed high-growth/high-valuation sectors once again. Perhaps no one sector better exemplifies both of those traits than semiconductors, and as I&#39;ve said here before, it&#39;s one ofthe reasons I like to trade semiconductors. You get big, trendy moves in both directions, so trading opportunities abound. Those opportunities have been firmly in one direction for the past week as the euphoria of the NVIDIA (NVDA) earnings rally fizzled after one day. Then, of course, came the news this week that NVIDIA in particular is facing abanon selling certain products to China and Russia. It&#39;s been rough, but it won&#39;t last forever.</p><p>For those looking for a volatile way to venture into trading the semiconductors on the long side, my favorite name to trade is the <a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/SOXL\">Direxion Daily Semiconductor 3x Bull Shares ETF</a>. The ETF does a nice job of tracking the performance of the semi index, but at a 3X daily rate. That means there&#39;s a lot of juice to the upside, but you have to be careful because that juice applies to the downside as well. Indeed, the ETF is more than 80% off its 2022 high.</p><p>However, if you time entries ahead of multi-week or multi-month moves in the semis, SOXL is just about the best way I can think of to take advantage.</p><p>What is SOXL?</p><p>SOXL is a way to gain exposure to the ICE Semiconductor Index, which you cannot trade directly. You can read about the indexhereif you&#39;re so inclined.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/641fc8fd37d8c2f91644324296855701\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"446\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Index factsheet</p><p>Essentially, the ICESEMIT is a float-adjusted market-cap-weighted index that tracks the 30 largest US-listed semiconductor companies. In other words, the index is a good tracker for the industry as it has a wide variety of companies from the semiconductor industry and the largest ones at that. If you&#39;re looking for a non-leveraged ETF that tracks this index pretty well, I would suggest you check out SOXX.</p><p>Back to SOXL though, we can see below the short-term performance of the ETF very closely tracks 3X the index, so on that basis, the ETF is doing its job quite well.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2919f8d858a3d8af1de3a24c1cb78195\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"149\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Fund factsheet</p><p>Trailing returns for just about any period are negative because, well, 2022, but the bottom line is that if you&#39;re looking to gain broad semi exposure, this is the best leveraged way I&#39;ve found.</p><p>If leverage isn&#39;t for you, one way you can use leveraged products like SOXL is just to be capital-efficient. For instance, if your normal position size is $3,000, instead of buying $3,000 of SOXX, you can buy $1,000 of SOXL and get essentially the same exposure. Just because a product is leveraged doesn&#39;t mean you have to be irresponsible; these can be great tools to be efficient with your capital, in addition to using it to make big bets one way or the other. There is tracking error over long periods, but it&#39;s a 3X leveraged trading vehicle, so that&#39;s to be expected. Use it responsibly and it&#39;s a great tool.</p><p>An ugly chart, but reason for optimism</p><p>So, without further ado, let&#39;s take a look at the current state of SOXL by starting with the daily chart.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/e9e5da029ddb856c46b93d42f05d59ca\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"812\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Stock Charts</p><p>I&#39;ve kept the annotations simple here because the idea behind buying SOXL in today&#39;s market is that semiconductors are oversold, and it&#39;s pretty evident SOXL is oversold. Of course, that does not mean it cannot become<i>more</i>oversold, because it certainly can. However, buying at times such as these increases our odds of success. And given there are no guarantees in investing, increasing your odds of success is all you can hope to achieve.</p><p>Why do I think SOXL has upside risk from here? The selloff in semis has been particularly swift and brutal since the selling began a week ago. The ETF hit $19.38 last Thursday, and in the five trading days since, has plummeted to close at $13.22 yesterday. That&#39;s a 30%+ decline in the space of<i>five days</i>, so that&#39;s why I said above the moves are huge in this thing. Before you take any positions in SOXL, know your game plan to stop out if things go against you. If not, you could end up holding some very heavy bags because this is NOT a buy-and-hold ETF for long periods of time. If you&#39;re wrong, just take your loss and get out.</p><p>Back to the chart, the accumulation/distribution line has actually soared during this last selling episode, which is quite encouraging. It means the intraday dips are being bought, and while that&#39;s not enough reason on its own to buy, it&#39;s a very nice feather in the cap of the bulls.</p><p>The PPO has fallen well below the centerline, which is not what I want to see, but the histogram on the PPO - which is simply the difference between the shorter-term line and the longer-term line - is showing signs of momentum exhaustion to the downside. That, like our other indicators, increases the odds the selling is at or near an exhaustion point.</p><p>The 14-day RSI has not reached oversold conditions, which is another good sign since securities that sell off enough for the 14-day RSI to reach oversold are generally in steep bear markets. The 5-day RSI, which is much shorter-term,<i>is</i>oversold so again, increasing the odds we get a bounce.</p><p>Finally, the candle from yesterday was quite bullish. The ETF fell very sharply in the morning (along with just about everything else), before rallying nearly as sharply in the afternoon. This kind of reversing candle can often portend the end of a trend, which would be most welcomed for SOXL at this point.</p><p>None of this guarantees us that SOXL is going to bounce. In fact, it could go to $11, or $10, or $8. However, the confluence of these factors greatly increases the odds that SOXL gets a bounce from here. This is the methodology I use with subscribers of my service, and in my own trading.</p><h3>Outlook for the sector</h3><p>Fundamentally, I think the semiconductors as an industry will do just fine over the long term. The group today has trough valuations, robust revenue expectations on strong, ever-expanding demand, and we&#39;re<i>still</i>facing shortages in a lot of cases. In other words, I don&#39;t think the industry has been harmed, and that this harm is the reason the stocks of the group continue to fall. Rather, we have fears of a recession and enormous declines in equity risk premiums that have driven valuations lower. Those factors are temporary, whereas a broken industry isn&#39;t.</p><p>Thus, if you&#39;re a long-term investor, I see bargains in the sector. But to be clear, you have to be very patient to buy-and-hold semiconductor stocks, because they make big moves in both directions. My long-term view also doesn&#39;t mean we cannot see more lower lows; that&#39;s certainly a possibility if this selloff morphs into a full panic. We aren&#39;t there, and hopefully, we won&#39;t be, but that&#39;s a possibility.</p><p>Let&#39;s now look at the relative price action of SOXL against the S&amp;P 500, which I&#39;ve plotted for two years below.</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/12dd65397329bb4b645a979e55b0da1b\" tg-width=\"640\" tg-height=\"319\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\" width=\"100%\" height=\"auto\"/>Stock Charts (relative strength)</p><p>The allure (and danger) of SOXL can be seen here with two very distinct phases. In the first half of this chart, semis outperformed greatly as estimates for earnings rose and valuations soared. SOXL outperformed the SPX by<i>260%</i>during this period. However, since the relative high in late 2021, SOXL has underperformed by 79%. This is why I said you cannot just hold and hope for a rebound if you&#39;re wrong; you could end up losing an enormous amount of your money.</p><p>Now, what I&#39;m watching here, in addition to the daily chart we looked at above, is whether SOXL (or SOXX, if you prefer) makes a new relative low to the SPX. If this is the bottom of the selling this time around, and we get a higher relative low, that&#39;s yet another signal that the selling for the semis is at or near an end.</p><p>The semis have been awful this year, but at some point, they will turn and outperform again. We&#39;re not there yet, but the current setup in the group may just be that catalyst. I think the risk is skewed to the upside from here, but please be prudent with position sizes and stop loss management.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>SOXL: Buying A Potential Bounce In Semiconductors</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nSOXL: Buying A Potential Bounce In Semiconductors\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-09-02 23:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4538661-soxl-etf-buying-potential-bounce-semiconductors><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummarySOXL has been destroyed in just the past week, ceding a third of its value.The long-term outlook for semis remains strong but faces headwinds near term.SOXL is very oversold and looks ready to ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4538661-soxl-etf-buying-potential-bounce-semiconductors\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SOXL":"三倍做多半导体ETF-Direxion Daily"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4538661-soxl-etf-buying-potential-bounce-semiconductors","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1190582229","content_text":"SummarySOXL has been destroyed in just the past week, ceding a third of its value.The long-term outlook for semis remains strong but faces headwinds near term.SOXL is very oversold and looks ready to bounce.The latest selling episode in the markets - which feels like about the 900th such episode this year - has crushed high-growth/high-valuation sectors once again. Perhaps no one sector better exemplifies both of those traits than semiconductors, and as I've said here before, it's one ofthe reasons I like to trade semiconductors. You get big, trendy moves in both directions, so trading opportunities abound. Those opportunities have been firmly in one direction for the past week as the euphoria of the NVIDIA (NVDA) earnings rally fizzled after one day. Then, of course, came the news this week that NVIDIA in particular is facing abanon selling certain products to China and Russia. It's been rough, but it won't last forever.For those looking for a volatile way to venture into trading the semiconductors on the long side, my favorite name to trade is the Direxion Daily Semiconductor 3x Bull Shares ETF. The ETF does a nice job of tracking the performance of the semi index, but at a 3X daily rate. That means there's a lot of juice to the upside, but you have to be careful because that juice applies to the downside as well. Indeed, the ETF is more than 80% off its 2022 high.However, if you time entries ahead of multi-week or multi-month moves in the semis, SOXL is just about the best way I can think of to take advantage.What is SOXL?SOXL is a way to gain exposure to the ICE Semiconductor Index, which you cannot trade directly. You can read about the indexhereif you're so inclined.Index factsheetEssentially, the ICESEMIT is a float-adjusted market-cap-weighted index that tracks the 30 largest US-listed semiconductor companies. In other words, the index is a good tracker for the industry as it has a wide variety of companies from the semiconductor industry and the largest ones at that. If you're looking for a non-leveraged ETF that tracks this index pretty well, I would suggest you check out SOXX.Back to SOXL though, we can see below the short-term performance of the ETF very closely tracks 3X the index, so on that basis, the ETF is doing its job quite well.Fund factsheetTrailing returns for just about any period are negative because, well, 2022, but the bottom line is that if you're looking to gain broad semi exposure, this is the best leveraged way I've found.If leverage isn't for you, one way you can use leveraged products like SOXL is just to be capital-efficient. For instance, if your normal position size is $3,000, instead of buying $3,000 of SOXX, you can buy $1,000 of SOXL and get essentially the same exposure. Just because a product is leveraged doesn't mean you have to be irresponsible; these can be great tools to be efficient with your capital, in addition to using it to make big bets one way or the other. There is tracking error over long periods, but it's a 3X leveraged trading vehicle, so that's to be expected. Use it responsibly and it's a great tool.An ugly chart, but reason for optimismSo, without further ado, let's take a look at the current state of SOXL by starting with the daily chart.Stock ChartsI've kept the annotations simple here because the idea behind buying SOXL in today's market is that semiconductors are oversold, and it's pretty evident SOXL is oversold. Of course, that does not mean it cannot becomemoreoversold, because it certainly can. However, buying at times such as these increases our odds of success. And given there are no guarantees in investing, increasing your odds of success is all you can hope to achieve.Why do I think SOXL has upside risk from here? The selloff in semis has been particularly swift and brutal since the selling began a week ago. The ETF hit $19.38 last Thursday, and in the five trading days since, has plummeted to close at $13.22 yesterday. That's a 30%+ decline in the space offive days, so that's why I said above the moves are huge in this thing. Before you take any positions in SOXL, know your game plan to stop out if things go against you. If not, you could end up holding some very heavy bags because this is NOT a buy-and-hold ETF for long periods of time. If you're wrong, just take your loss and get out.Back to the chart, the accumulation/distribution line has actually soared during this last selling episode, which is quite encouraging. It means the intraday dips are being bought, and while that's not enough reason on its own to buy, it's a very nice feather in the cap of the bulls.The PPO has fallen well below the centerline, which is not what I want to see, but the histogram on the PPO - which is simply the difference between the shorter-term line and the longer-term line - is showing signs of momentum exhaustion to the downside. That, like our other indicators, increases the odds the selling is at or near an exhaustion point.The 14-day RSI has not reached oversold conditions, which is another good sign since securities that sell off enough for the 14-day RSI to reach oversold are generally in steep bear markets. The 5-day RSI, which is much shorter-term,isoversold so again, increasing the odds we get a bounce.Finally, the candle from yesterday was quite bullish. The ETF fell very sharply in the morning (along with just about everything else), before rallying nearly as sharply in the afternoon. This kind of reversing candle can often portend the end of a trend, which would be most welcomed for SOXL at this point.None of this guarantees us that SOXL is going to bounce. In fact, it could go to $11, or $10, or $8. However, the confluence of these factors greatly increases the odds that SOXL gets a bounce from here. This is the methodology I use with subscribers of my service, and in my own trading.Outlook for the sectorFundamentally, I think the semiconductors as an industry will do just fine over the long term. The group today has trough valuations, robust revenue expectations on strong, ever-expanding demand, and we'restillfacing shortages in a lot of cases. In other words, I don't think the industry has been harmed, and that this harm is the reason the stocks of the group continue to fall. Rather, we have fears of a recession and enormous declines in equity risk premiums that have driven valuations lower. Those factors are temporary, whereas a broken industry isn't.Thus, if you're a long-term investor, I see bargains in the sector. But to be clear, you have to be very patient to buy-and-hold semiconductor stocks, because they make big moves in both directions. My long-term view also doesn't mean we cannot see more lower lows; that's certainly a possibility if this selloff morphs into a full panic. We aren't there, and hopefully, we won't be, but that's a possibility.Let's now look at the relative price action of SOXL against the S&P 500, which I've plotted for two years below.Stock Charts (relative strength)The allure (and danger) of SOXL can be seen here with two very distinct phases. In the first half of this chart, semis outperformed greatly as estimates for earnings rose and valuations soared. SOXL outperformed the SPX by260%during this period. However, since the relative high in late 2021, SOXL has underperformed by 79%. This is why I said you cannot just hold and hope for a rebound if you're wrong; you could end up losing an enormous amount of your money.Now, what I'm watching here, in addition to the daily chart we looked at above, is whether SOXL (or SOXX, if you prefer) makes a new relative low to the SPX. If this is the bottom of the selling this time around, and we get a higher relative low, that's yet another signal that the selling for the semis is at or near an end.The semis have been awful this year, but at some point, they will turn and outperform again. We're not there yet, but the current setup in the group may just be that catalyst. I think the risk is skewed to the upside from here, but please be prudent with position sizes and stop loss management.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":707,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9907345555,"gmtCreate":1660147731980,"gmtModify":1703478422871,"author":{"id":"3581920930646755","authorId":"3581920930646755","name":"Chonky","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b26c78fb11a9e646bce483ea1b0d6f3","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581920930646755","idStr":"3581920930646755"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like&nbsp;","listText":"Like&nbsp;","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9907345555","repostId":"1115772826","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":816,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9904593634,"gmtCreate":1660069616030,"gmtModify":1703477480527,"author":{"id":"3581920930646755","authorId":"3581920930646755","name":"Chonky","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b26c78fb11a9e646bce483ea1b0d6f3","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581920930646755","idStr":"3581920930646755"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":4,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9904593634","repostId":"1105480511","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"1105480511","kind":"news","pubTimestamp":1660059180,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/1105480511?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-09 23:33","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF: The Best Offense Is Defense","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=1105480511","media":"Seeking Alpha","summary":"SummaryWith a 30-day SEC yield of only 2.89%, Vanguard's High Dividend Yield ETF doesn't offer what many investors would consider to be a \"high dividend yield\".However, the fund's \"value\" oriented por","content":"<html><head></head><body><p><b>Summary</b></p><ul><li>With a 30-day SEC yield of only 2.89%, Vanguard&#39;s High Dividend Yield ETF doesn&#39;t offer what many investors would consider to be a &#34;high dividend yield&#34;.</li><li>However, the fund&#39;s &#34;value&#34; oriented portfolio is well positioned for today&#39;s volatile and uncertain market and has outperformed the S&amp;P 500 by 8% over the past year.</li><li>That proves the old football saying that sometimes &#34;the best offense is a great defense&#34;.</li><li>Today, I&#39;ll take a closer look at the VYM ETF and see if it makes sense for an allocation within your portfolio.</li></ul><p>While the <b>Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF</b>(NYSEARCA:VYM) may not offer an eye-popping yield (it&#39;s only 2.89%), the value oriented fund appears to be well-positioned for today&#39;s uncertain and volatile market. That&#39;s because VYM&#39;s portfolio is over-weight in the Financials, Health Care, Energy, and Consumer Staples sectors. That is, sectors that are considered to be defensive in nature, represent &#34;value&#34;, and typically do well during times of high inflation and rising interest rates. As a result, it is not surprising that VYM has outperformed the S&amp;P 500 by ~8% over the past year. That being the case, I&#39;ll take a closer look at the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF today in order to see if it may make sense for an allocation within your portfolio.</p><p><b>Investment Thesis</b></p><p>As many of you know, during the recent rip-roaring bull market that ended in a bear market this year, growth stocks clobbered value and dividend paying stocks. However, all it took was a bear market to remind investors there is real &#34;value&#34; in having a diversified portfolio that contains an allocation to dividend paying stocks.</p><p>Indeed, investors need only look at the scoreboard on Seeking Alpha&#39;s homepage to see what has taken place over the past year and the past three years:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/5a1fa4f0227283ab1a4d10a6604a3773\" tg-width=\"590\" tg-height=\"228\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Seeking Alpha</p><p>As can be seen in the graphic, although the &#34;high dividend yield&#34; and &#34;dividend growth&#34; growth categories have significantly outperformed &#34;growth&#34; over the past year, the 3-Year returns speak for themselves. That being the case, an ETF like VYM can add some stability or ballast to a portfolio in times of rocky and volatile markets. I&#39;d argue that the current high-inflation and rising interest rate market is therefore an excellent time for investors to consider a lower-risk &#34;value&#34; oriented ETF like VYM.</p><p>So let&#39;s take a look to see how the VYM has positioned investors for success going forward.</p><p><b>Top-10 Holdings</b></p><p>The top-10 holdings in the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF are shown below and equate to what I consider to be a relatively well-diversified 23.5% of the entire 443 stock portfolio:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ffe701e7e31e6ec5815613add46c7d4c\" tg-width=\"418\" tg-height=\"469\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Vanguard</p><p>The #1 holding is <b>Johnson &amp; Johnson</b>(JNJ) with a 3.5% weight. The well-diversified healthcare and pharmaceuticals company is down only 1.5% over the past year, pays a $4.52/share annual dividend, and currently yields 2.5%.</p><p><b>Exxon Mobil</b>(XOM) is the #2 holding and - combined with the #6 holding<b>Chevron</b>(CVX) - represents a 4.8% weighting in the O&amp;G sector within VYM&#39;s top-10 holdings. Exxon delivered$16.9 billion in free-cash-flow in Q2 while Chevron&#39;s profits soared in Q2 and crushed consensus estimates. Exxon currently yields 3.97% while Chevron yields 3.59%. The stocks of both companies are up over 50% during the past 12-months.</p><p>The fund&#39;s top-10 holdings have an aggregate 6.3% weight in big pharma companies <b>Pfizer</b>(PFE), <b>Eli Lilly</b>(LLY), and <b>AbbVie</b>(ABBV). The three companies yield 3.2%, 1.2%, and 4.0%, respectively. All three companies have held up very well during the bear market - each one significantly outperforming the S&amp;P 500:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c88ae4ec9c4d959d34fe1fe823c35e4f\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"877\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>PFEdata by YCharts</p><p><b>Coca-Cola</b>(KO) rounds out the top-10 with a 1.8% weight. Coke is up 12.2% over the past year and currently yields 2.71%.</p><p>As far as the entire portfolio is concerned, the allocation of capital is weighted toward defensive sectors (or what some investors consider to be &#34;value&#34;) that typically outperform in periods of high-inflation and rising interest rates. Indeed, the Consumer Staples, Energy, Financials, and Health Care sectors, in aggregate, account for 57.5% of the entire portfolio:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3cfaeef61efcd2e6b2c024c34fcd17fa\" tg-width=\"500\" tg-height=\"549\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Vanguard</p><p>Meantime, note that a more value and yield oriented portfolio means that the VYM ETF trades at a significant discount to the overall market:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/0dcd70a83908904ec2b865d7a462965b\" tg-width=\"339\" tg-height=\"336\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Vanguard</p><p>The current P/E and price-to-book ratios of the S&amp;P 500 are20.9xand4.5x, respectively. So not only do shareholders get a better yield than the S&amp;P 500&#39;s1.5%, but I would argue they also have a considerably less risky asset that is trading at a deeply discounted value as compared to the broad market. The other side of the coin is that the EPS growth rate of 11.0% won&#39;t be that impressive to growth-oriented investors.</p><p><b>Performance</b></p><p>The graphic below compares the one-year performance of the VYM ETF against that of a competing fund - the <b>Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF</b>(SCHD) - and the major market indexes as represented by the (VOO), (DIA), and (QQQ) ETFs:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3d35c76bed22ae7cd82643423b510b92\" tg-width=\"1280\" tg-height=\"903\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/>VYM Total Return Level data by YCharts</p><p>As you can see, the VYM ETF comes out on top and has outperformed the SCHD ETF by 1.5%+. The VYM ETF&#39;s long-term track record is shown below:</p><p><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/ec9bcf7978a099deaee1183cf7eeecdf\" tg-width=\"629\" tg-height=\"153\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/></p><p>Vanguard</p><p>As can be seen by the graphic, the VYM ETF has delivered a 10-year average annual return of a very solid, but unspectacular, 11.5%.</p><p><b>Risks</b></p><p>The VYM ETF is not unlike any other broad market fund these days and is therefore subject to the typical risks associated with COVID-19, high inflation, rising interest rates, a potential global economic slowdown, and Putin&#39;s horrific war-of-choice with Ukraine as well as rising tensions as a result of the China/Taiwan/U.S. controversy. That said, I would argue that the VYM ETF is much less risky as compared to the S&amp;P 500, DJIA, or Nasdaq-100.</p><p>VYM&#39;s expense fee is 0.06%, and like most Vanguard funds, is a very cost-efficient fund. The median market cap in the portfolio is $130 billion, and the fund has assets of $55.6 billion. That being the case, I have no liquidity related concerns whatsoever.</p><p><b>Summary &amp; Conclusions</b></p><p>Though the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF only yields 2.89%, I find the ETF to be quite attractive here. In my opinion, the portfolio is very well constructed to navigate through the current high-inflation and rising interest rate environment. The value-oriented portfolio trades at a significant discount to the S&amp;P 500 while also having an arguably lower risk profile. For those investors looking for decent - though unspectacular - income and have been building up cash to invest in the market, they could certainly do worse than allocating some capital to the VYM ETF, which I rate a BUY.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF: The Best Offense Is Defense</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nVanguard High Dividend Yield ETF: The Best Offense Is Defense\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-09 23:33 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://seekingalpha.com/article/4531331-vanguard-high-dividend-yield-etf-the-best-offense-is-defense><strong>Seeking Alpha</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>SummaryWith a 30-day SEC yield of only 2.89%, Vanguard's High Dividend Yield ETF doesn't offer what many investors would consider to be a \"high dividend yield\".However, the fund's \"value\" oriented ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4531331-vanguard-high-dividend-yield-etf-the-best-offense-is-defense\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"VYM":"红利股ETF-Vanguard"},"source_url":"https://seekingalpha.com/article/4531331-vanguard-high-dividend-yield-etf-the-best-offense-is-defense","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"1105480511","content_text":"SummaryWith a 30-day SEC yield of only 2.89%, Vanguard's High Dividend Yield ETF doesn't offer what many investors would consider to be a \"high dividend yield\".However, the fund's \"value\" oriented portfolio is well positioned for today's volatile and uncertain market and has outperformed the S&P 500 by 8% over the past year.That proves the old football saying that sometimes \"the best offense is a great defense\".Today, I'll take a closer look at the VYM ETF and see if it makes sense for an allocation within your portfolio.While the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF(NYSEARCA:VYM) may not offer an eye-popping yield (it's only 2.89%), the value oriented fund appears to be well-positioned for today's uncertain and volatile market. That's because VYM's portfolio is over-weight in the Financials, Health Care, Energy, and Consumer Staples sectors. That is, sectors that are considered to be defensive in nature, represent \"value\", and typically do well during times of high inflation and rising interest rates. As a result, it is not surprising that VYM has outperformed the S&P 500 by ~8% over the past year. That being the case, I'll take a closer look at the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF today in order to see if it may make sense for an allocation within your portfolio.Investment ThesisAs many of you know, during the recent rip-roaring bull market that ended in a bear market this year, growth stocks clobbered value and dividend paying stocks. However, all it took was a bear market to remind investors there is real \"value\" in having a diversified portfolio that contains an allocation to dividend paying stocks.Indeed, investors need only look at the scoreboard on Seeking Alpha's homepage to see what has taken place over the past year and the past three years:Seeking AlphaAs can be seen in the graphic, although the \"high dividend yield\" and \"dividend growth\" growth categories have significantly outperformed \"growth\" over the past year, the 3-Year returns speak for themselves. That being the case, an ETF like VYM can add some stability or ballast to a portfolio in times of rocky and volatile markets. I'd argue that the current high-inflation and rising interest rate market is therefore an excellent time for investors to consider a lower-risk \"value\" oriented ETF like VYM.So let's take a look to see how the VYM has positioned investors for success going forward.Top-10 HoldingsThe top-10 holdings in the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF are shown below and equate to what I consider to be a relatively well-diversified 23.5% of the entire 443 stock portfolio:VanguardThe #1 holding is Johnson & Johnson(JNJ) with a 3.5% weight. The well-diversified healthcare and pharmaceuticals company is down only 1.5% over the past year, pays a $4.52/share annual dividend, and currently yields 2.5%.Exxon Mobil(XOM) is the #2 holding and - combined with the #6 holdingChevron(CVX) - represents a 4.8% weighting in the O&G sector within VYM's top-10 holdings. Exxon delivered$16.9 billion in free-cash-flow in Q2 while Chevron's profits soared in Q2 and crushed consensus estimates. Exxon currently yields 3.97% while Chevron yields 3.59%. The stocks of both companies are up over 50% during the past 12-months.The fund's top-10 holdings have an aggregate 6.3% weight in big pharma companies Pfizer(PFE), Eli Lilly(LLY), and AbbVie(ABBV). The three companies yield 3.2%, 1.2%, and 4.0%, respectively. All three companies have held up very well during the bear market - each one significantly outperforming the S&P 500:PFEdata by YChartsCoca-Cola(KO) rounds out the top-10 with a 1.8% weight. Coke is up 12.2% over the past year and currently yields 2.71%.As far as the entire portfolio is concerned, the allocation of capital is weighted toward defensive sectors (or what some investors consider to be \"value\") that typically outperform in periods of high-inflation and rising interest rates. Indeed, the Consumer Staples, Energy, Financials, and Health Care sectors, in aggregate, account for 57.5% of the entire portfolio:VanguardMeantime, note that a more value and yield oriented portfolio means that the VYM ETF trades at a significant discount to the overall market:VanguardThe current P/E and price-to-book ratios of the S&P 500 are20.9xand4.5x, respectively. So not only do shareholders get a better yield than the S&P 500's1.5%, but I would argue they also have a considerably less risky asset that is trading at a deeply discounted value as compared to the broad market. The other side of the coin is that the EPS growth rate of 11.0% won't be that impressive to growth-oriented investors.PerformanceThe graphic below compares the one-year performance of the VYM ETF against that of a competing fund - the Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF(SCHD) - and the major market indexes as represented by the (VOO), (DIA), and (QQQ) ETFs:VYM Total Return Level data by YChartsAs you can see, the VYM ETF comes out on top and has outperformed the SCHD ETF by 1.5%+. The VYM ETF's long-term track record is shown below:VanguardAs can be seen by the graphic, the VYM ETF has delivered a 10-year average annual return of a very solid, but unspectacular, 11.5%.RisksThe VYM ETF is not unlike any other broad market fund these days and is therefore subject to the typical risks associated with COVID-19, high inflation, rising interest rates, a potential global economic slowdown, and Putin's horrific war-of-choice with Ukraine as well as rising tensions as a result of the China/Taiwan/U.S. controversy. That said, I would argue that the VYM ETF is much less risky as compared to the S&P 500, DJIA, or Nasdaq-100.VYM's expense fee is 0.06%, and like most Vanguard funds, is a very cost-efficient fund. The median market cap in the portfolio is $130 billion, and the fund has assets of $55.6 billion. That being the case, I have no liquidity related concerns whatsoever.Summary & ConclusionsThough the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF only yields 2.89%, I find the ETF to be quite attractive here. In my opinion, the portfolio is very well constructed to navigate through the current high-inflation and rising interest rate environment. The value-oriented portfolio trades at a significant discount to the S&P 500 while also having an arguably lower risk profile. For those investors looking for decent - though unspectacular - income and have been building up cash to invest in the market, they could certainly do worse than allocating some capital to the VYM ETF, which I rate a BUY.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":660,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9905231329,"gmtCreate":1659892699365,"gmtModify":1703767390140,"author":{"id":"3581920930646755","authorId":"3581920930646755","name":"Chonky","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b26c78fb11a9e646bce483ea1b0d6f3","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581920930646755","idStr":"3581920930646755"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like please&nbsp;","listText":"Like please&nbsp;","text":"Like please","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9905231329","repostId":"2256956201","repostType":4,"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":425,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9906230421,"gmtCreate":1659552370866,"gmtModify":1705981465093,"author":{"id":"3581920930646755","authorId":"3581920930646755","name":"Chonky","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b26c78fb11a9e646bce483ea1b0d6f3","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581920930646755","idStr":"3581920930646755"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"K","listText":"K","text":"K","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9906230421","repostId":"2256956201","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2256956201","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1659541401,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2256956201?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-03 23:43","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Nasdaq 100 Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist in August","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2256956201","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The growth-centric Nasdaq 100 is home to three widely owned stocks that are cheaper than they've ever been.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>There&#39;s no sugarcoating it: Wall Street has had a miserable year. Since hitting a record-closing high during the first week of January, the widely followed <b>S&amp;P 500</b> has lost as much as 24% of its value and tumbled into bear market territory.</p><p>But it&#39;s been an even tougher go for growth-dependent stock indexes, such as the <b>Nasdaq Composite</b> and <b>Nasdaq 100</b>. The latter is comprised of the 100 largest nonfinancial stocks listed on the <b>Nasdaq</b> exchange. Since hitting their all-time highs, both the Nasdaq Composite and Nasdaq 100 have shed close to a third of their value at their peak.</p><p>But there&#39;s another side to this story. While bear market declines can be scary, they&#39;re also the ideal time for long-term investors to do some shopping. This is especially true for growth stocks, which have taken it on the chin during the 2022 swoon in equities. The Nasdaq 100 is currently housing three bargain growth stocks that can confidently be bought hand over fist in August.</p><h2>Amazon</h2><p>The first Nasdaq 100 stock that proved, once again, it belongs in investors&#39; portfolios and can be bought hand over fist in August is e-commerce stock <b>Amazon</b> (AMZN).</p><p>In each of the past two quarters, U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) retraced. This comes atop persistent supply chain issues caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as historically high inflation, which hit a four-decade high of 9.1% in June. In other words, Wall Street and investors fully expected Amazon to face-plant when it reported its second-quarter operating results. While there were a number of one-time charges that weighed on the company&#39;s bottom line, the fact remains that its high-margin operating segments and long-term growth trajectory remain unfazed by near-term economic weakness.</p><p>The interesting thing about Amazon is that its most well-known operating segment may prove to be its least important over the long run. On the one hand, Amazon&#39;s online marketplace is expected to account for 39.5% of U.S. online retail sales in 2022. That&#39;s more than its next-closest 14 competitors added together. On the other hand, retail is a low-margin segment.</p><p>What&#39;s far more important for Amazon is how its marketplace has helped funnel business into its higher-margin segments. For instance, the company&#39;s leading marketplace helped it sign up more than 200 million Prime members. The tens of billions of dollars collected in annual Prime fees allow Amazon to invest in its rapidly growing logistics network and redirect capital to high-margin initiatives.</p><p>Arguably the highest-margin initiative for the company is Amazon Web Services (AWS). According to a report from Canalys, AWS accounted for 33% of global cloud infrastructure spending in the first quarter. AWS managed 33% year-over-year sales growth in the challenged second quarter and has consistently provided the lion&#39;s share of Amazon&#39;s operating income despite accounting for around 15% to 16% of net sales.</p><p>The final reason to pile into Amazon is its valuation. After more than a decade of investors willingly paying 20 or more times year-end cash flow, investors can buy Amazon right now for a little over nine times Wall Street&#39;s forecast cash flow in 2025.</p><h2>PayPal Holdings</h2><p>The second Nasdaq 100 stock that&#39;s begging to be bought in August is fintech giant <b>PayPal Holdings</b> (PYPL). PayPal is the parent of popular peer-to-peer payment app Venmo.</p><p>The prevailing concern for digital payment companies over the past couple of quarters is that inflation would adversely impact their operating performance. Rising prices disproportionately impact lower-earning deciles, which has the potential to result in reduced usage on digital payment platforms. Although PayPal has, indeed, sounded a cautious tone over the short run, the theme of this list is that its long-term growth strategy remains well intact.</p><p>For instance, PayPal managed to deliver 15% constant-currency growth in total payment volume on its platform during Q1 (note, this write-up was done prior to PayPal reporting Q2 results on Aug. 2, 2022). Not only does this demonstrate that consumer spending is stronger than some folks realize, but it suggests that digital payments are still in their infancy and capable of sustained, double-digit growth for a long time to come.</p><p>What&#39;s more, engagement across PayPal&#39;s digital platforms has been steadily climbing. At the end of 2020, active users were completing an average of 40.9 transactions over the trailing-12-month period. But as of the end of Q1 2022, the average active user was undertaking 47 transactions over the trailing-12-month period.  If this figure keeps rising, it suggests PayPal should have no trouble extracting increasingly larger profits out of its growing active users.</p><p>PayPal also expects to be a sizable player in the buy now, pay later (BNPL) space. While most BNPL businesses are likely to see delinquencies rise as the U.S. and global economy worsens in the coming quarters, the future for financed digital purchases appears bright. It&#39;s why PayPal ponied up $2.7 billion to acquire BNPL provider Paidy in Japan in 2021.</p><p>Over the past five years, PayPal has averaged a forward-year price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 38.1. Investors can scoop up shares right now for less than half that amount (18.3 times forward-year earnings).</p><h2>Alphabet</h2><p>The third Nasdaq 100 stock to buy hand over fist in August is none other than FAANG stock <b>Alphabet</b> (GOOGL) (GOOG). Alphabet is the parent company of widely used internet search engine Google and streaming platform YouTube.</p><p>Any skepticism toward Alphabet effectively echoes what&#39;s already been said about Amazon and PayPal. With the U.S. in what some might consider to be a &#34;recession&#34; after two consecutive quarterly GDP declines, there&#39;s the belief that ad revenue will take a sizable hit. Since Alphabet generates the bulk of its sales from ads, there&#39;s a possibility it could see sales and profits decline as the U.S. and global economy weaken. But this only tells a small sliver of the company&#39;s growth story.</p><p>To begin with, Google might as well be considered a monopoly in the internet search space. For the past two years (through June 2022), it&#39;s controlled up to a 93% global share of internet search.  With the next-closest competitor 88 percentage points in the rearview mirror, it&#39;s no wonder the company is able to command such excellent pricing power on its ads. Save for the initial stages of the pandemic that led to lockdowns, Google has consistently grown by a double-digit percentage for more than two decades.</p><p>But just like Amazon, it&#39;s not Alphabet&#39;s foundation that is its most exciting segment. Rather, it&#39;s the numerous revenue offshoots that offer superior growth potential throughout the decade.</p><p>For instance, YouTube has become one of the most visited social media sites on the planet, with 2.56 billion monthly active users. Based on Alphabet&#39;s Q2 results, YouTube is generating an annual run rate of more than $29 billion in ad revenue (not including subscriptions).</p><p>There&#39;s also Google Cloud, which is Alphabet&#39;s cloud infrastructure service segment. It was the global No. 3 in cloud spending during Q1, with 8% market share, per Canalys. Even though Google Cloud is weighing on Alphabet&#39;s bottom line for the moment, the high margins typically associated with cloud services should help it become a positive driver of operating cash flow sooner than later.</p><p>At no point in Alphabet&#39;s storied history has it ever been this inexpensive relative to Wall Street&#39;s forward-year earnings forecast or cash flow projections. That makes Alphabet perhaps the smartest buy on this list and within the Nasdaq 100 right now.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Nasdaq 100 Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist in August</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Nasdaq 100 Stocks to Buy Hand Over Fist in August\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-03 23:43 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/03/3-nasdaq-100-stocks-buy-hand-over-fist-in-august/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>There's no sugarcoating it: Wall Street has had a miserable year. Since hitting a record-closing high during the first week of January, the widely followed S&P 500 has lost as much as 24% of its value...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/03/3-nasdaq-100-stocks-buy-hand-over-fist-in-august/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"GOOG":"谷歌","PYPL":"PayPal","AMZN":"亚马逊"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/03/3-nasdaq-100-stocks-buy-hand-over-fist-in-august/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2256956201","content_text":"There's no sugarcoating it: Wall Street has had a miserable year. Since hitting a record-closing high during the first week of January, the widely followed S&P 500 has lost as much as 24% of its value and tumbled into bear market territory.But it's been an even tougher go for growth-dependent stock indexes, such as the Nasdaq Composite and Nasdaq 100. The latter is comprised of the 100 largest nonfinancial stocks listed on the Nasdaq exchange. Since hitting their all-time highs, both the Nasdaq Composite and Nasdaq 100 have shed close to a third of their value at their peak.But there's another side to this story. While bear market declines can be scary, they're also the ideal time for long-term investors to do some shopping. This is especially true for growth stocks, which have taken it on the chin during the 2022 swoon in equities. The Nasdaq 100 is currently housing three bargain growth stocks that can confidently be bought hand over fist in August.AmazonThe first Nasdaq 100 stock that proved, once again, it belongs in investors' portfolios and can be bought hand over fist in August is e-commerce stock Amazon (AMZN).In each of the past two quarters, U.S. gross domestic product (GDP) retraced. This comes atop persistent supply chain issues caused by the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as historically high inflation, which hit a four-decade high of 9.1% in June. In other words, Wall Street and investors fully expected Amazon to face-plant when it reported its second-quarter operating results. While there were a number of one-time charges that weighed on the company's bottom line, the fact remains that its high-margin operating segments and long-term growth trajectory remain unfazed by near-term economic weakness.The interesting thing about Amazon is that its most well-known operating segment may prove to be its least important over the long run. On the one hand, Amazon's online marketplace is expected to account for 39.5% of U.S. online retail sales in 2022. That's more than its next-closest 14 competitors added together. On the other hand, retail is a low-margin segment.What's far more important for Amazon is how its marketplace has helped funnel business into its higher-margin segments. For instance, the company's leading marketplace helped it sign up more than 200 million Prime members. The tens of billions of dollars collected in annual Prime fees allow Amazon to invest in its rapidly growing logistics network and redirect capital to high-margin initiatives.Arguably the highest-margin initiative for the company is Amazon Web Services (AWS). According to a report from Canalys, AWS accounted for 33% of global cloud infrastructure spending in the first quarter. AWS managed 33% year-over-year sales growth in the challenged second quarter and has consistently provided the lion's share of Amazon's operating income despite accounting for around 15% to 16% of net sales.The final reason to pile into Amazon is its valuation. After more than a decade of investors willingly paying 20 or more times year-end cash flow, investors can buy Amazon right now for a little over nine times Wall Street's forecast cash flow in 2025.PayPal HoldingsThe second Nasdaq 100 stock that's begging to be bought in August is fintech giant PayPal Holdings (PYPL). PayPal is the parent of popular peer-to-peer payment app Venmo.The prevailing concern for digital payment companies over the past couple of quarters is that inflation would adversely impact their operating performance. Rising prices disproportionately impact lower-earning deciles, which has the potential to result in reduced usage on digital payment platforms. Although PayPal has, indeed, sounded a cautious tone over the short run, the theme of this list is that its long-term growth strategy remains well intact.For instance, PayPal managed to deliver 15% constant-currency growth in total payment volume on its platform during Q1 (note, this write-up was done prior to PayPal reporting Q2 results on Aug. 2, 2022). Not only does this demonstrate that consumer spending is stronger than some folks realize, but it suggests that digital payments are still in their infancy and capable of sustained, double-digit growth for a long time to come.What's more, engagement across PayPal's digital platforms has been steadily climbing. At the end of 2020, active users were completing an average of 40.9 transactions over the trailing-12-month period. But as of the end of Q1 2022, the average active user was undertaking 47 transactions over the trailing-12-month period.  If this figure keeps rising, it suggests PayPal should have no trouble extracting increasingly larger profits out of its growing active users.PayPal also expects to be a sizable player in the buy now, pay later (BNPL) space. While most BNPL businesses are likely to see delinquencies rise as the U.S. and global economy worsens in the coming quarters, the future for financed digital purchases appears bright. It's why PayPal ponied up $2.7 billion to acquire BNPL provider Paidy in Japan in 2021.Over the past five years, PayPal has averaged a forward-year price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 38.1. Investors can scoop up shares right now for less than half that amount (18.3 times forward-year earnings).AlphabetThe third Nasdaq 100 stock to buy hand over fist in August is none other than FAANG stock Alphabet (GOOGL) (GOOG). Alphabet is the parent company of widely used internet search engine Google and streaming platform YouTube.Any skepticism toward Alphabet effectively echoes what's already been said about Amazon and PayPal. With the U.S. in what some might consider to be a \"recession\" after two consecutive quarterly GDP declines, there's the belief that ad revenue will take a sizable hit. Since Alphabet generates the bulk of its sales from ads, there's a possibility it could see sales and profits decline as the U.S. and global economy weaken. But this only tells a small sliver of the company's growth story.To begin with, Google might as well be considered a monopoly in the internet search space. For the past two years (through June 2022), it's controlled up to a 93% global share of internet search.  With the next-closest competitor 88 percentage points in the rearview mirror, it's no wonder the company is able to command such excellent pricing power on its ads. Save for the initial stages of the pandemic that led to lockdowns, Google has consistently grown by a double-digit percentage for more than two decades.But just like Amazon, it's not Alphabet's foundation that is its most exciting segment. Rather, it's the numerous revenue offshoots that offer superior growth potential throughout the decade.For instance, YouTube has become one of the most visited social media sites on the planet, with 2.56 billion monthly active users. Based on Alphabet's Q2 results, YouTube is generating an annual run rate of more than $29 billion in ad revenue (not including subscriptions).There's also Google Cloud, which is Alphabet's cloud infrastructure service segment. It was the global No. 3 in cloud spending during Q1, with 8% market share, per Canalys. Even though Google Cloud is weighing on Alphabet's bottom line for the moment, the high margins typically associated with cloud services should help it become a positive driver of operating cash flow sooner than later.At no point in Alphabet's storied history has it ever been this inexpensive relative to Wall Street's forward-year earnings forecast or cash flow projections. That makes Alphabet perhaps the smartest buy on this list and within the Nasdaq 100 right now.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":680,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9908718915,"gmtCreate":1659436854240,"gmtModify":1705980344385,"author":{"id":"3581920930646755","authorId":"3581920930646755","name":"Chonky","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b26c78fb11a9e646bce483ea1b0d6f3","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581920930646755","idStr":"3581920930646755"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9908718915","repostId":"2256654277","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2256654277","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1659454665,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2256654277?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-08-02 23:37","market":"us","language":"en","title":"3 Stocks to Avoid This Week","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2256654277","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"These investments seem pretty vulnerable right now.","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Things roughly worked out for my &#34;three stocks to avoid&#34; column last week. The three stocks I thought were going to lose to the market for the week -- <b>Shopify</b>, <b>Fat Brands</b>, and <b>Tesla Motors</b> -- declined 7%, rose 1%, and surged 9%, respectively, averaging out to a 1% increase.</p><p>The <b>S&amp;P 500</b> experienced a 4.3% move higher. I was correct, as the average return of the three of the investments I figured would fare worse fell short. I have now been right in 27 of the past 41 weeks.</p><p>Where do I go to next? I see <b><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/W\">Wayfair</a></b>, <b>TrueCar</b>, and <b>Tesla Motors</b> as stocks you may want to consider steering clear of this week. Let&#39;s go over my near-term concerns with all three investments.</p><h2><b>Wayfair</b></h2><p>One of the market&#39;s big winners during the early stages of the COVID-19 crisis has buckled like a flimsy sofa. Wayfair was a market darling when we were hunkering down at the start of the pandemic. We were going to spend a lot of time at home, so we were turning to the online retailer of furniture and other home essentials to get as comfortable as possible. A lot of folks also moved to the suburbs to get more bang for their real estate buck, and those new digs needed new pieces of furniture to make the house a home.</p><p>It&#39;s a whole new world for Wayfair. Revenue growth has been negative for four consecutive quarters. The bottom line is getting worse. In just the last three months we&#39;ve seen Wall Street estimates for losses more than double for 2022 and almost quadruple come next year. The new shift to enter physical retail won&#39;t be cheap. With sales expected to decline this year and profitability nowhere in sight it&#39;s hard to get excited about Wayfair despite its brand awareness and cool digital tools like letting shoppers use augmented reality to see what a potential purchase would look like in their actual room. Wayfair reports quarterly results on Thursday morning. The market&#39;s already bracing for a bad report, but sometimes that&#39;s not enough.</p><h2><b>TrueCar</b></h2><p>The online lead generator for auto showrooms has been up on blocks lately. Revenue is going the wrong way. Losses are mounting. It has posted larger-than-expected deficits in back-to-back quarters. Analyst forecasts for red ink continue to grow. It&#39;s against this uninspiring backdrop that TrueCar reports its second-quarter financial results on Tuesday afternoon.</p><p>TrueCar has run into a few speed bumps over the years. It has had to tweak its original shopper-friendly model to appeal to both buyers and showroom dealers, and that&#39;s a delicate balance. This is also a rough time to be selling vehicles with high gas prices and lean inventory for the hotter cars. The stock has shed nearly 90% of its value since peaking eight years ago, and it&#39;s hard to say that it isn&#39;t a lemon these days.</p><h2><b>Tesla Motors</b></h2><p>This is the third week in a row that Tesla Motors makes the cut. I was wrong the last two weeks. Is the third time the charm or the harm? The stock has risen this month despite a far from perfect quarterly update and a whirlwind of controversies and distractions.</p><p>Tesla has outpaced the market the last two weeks as a high-beta stock on cruise control in a rising market. The stock&#39;s steep valuation seems immune to weakness in the general automotive market, and rising gas prices are naturally an incentive to go electric. After two weeks of big moves, I feel it&#39;s time for Tesla Motors to pull off the road and recharge. We&#39;ll see if I get burned again.</p><p>It&#39;s going to be a bumpy road for some of these investments. If you&#39;re looking for safe stocks, you aren&#39;t likely to find them in Wayfair, TrueCar and Tesla Motors this week.</p></body></html>","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>3 Stocks to Avoid This Week</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n3 Stocks to Avoid This Week\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-08-02 23:37 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/01/3-stocks-to-avoid-this-week/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Things roughly worked out for my \"three stocks to avoid\" column last week. The three stocks I thought were going to lose to the market for the week -- Shopify, Fat Brands, and Tesla Motors -- declined...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/01/3-stocks-to-avoid-this-week/\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"TRUE":"TrueCar, Inc.","W":"Wayfair","TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2022/08/01/3-stocks-to-avoid-this-week/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2256654277","content_text":"Things roughly worked out for my \"three stocks to avoid\" column last week. The three stocks I thought were going to lose to the market for the week -- Shopify, Fat Brands, and Tesla Motors -- declined 7%, rose 1%, and surged 9%, respectively, averaging out to a 1% increase.The S&P 500 experienced a 4.3% move higher. I was correct, as the average return of the three of the investments I figured would fare worse fell short. I have now been right in 27 of the past 41 weeks.Where do I go to next? I see Wayfair, TrueCar, and Tesla Motors as stocks you may want to consider steering clear of this week. Let's go over my near-term concerns with all three investments.WayfairOne of the market's big winners during the early stages of the COVID-19 crisis has buckled like a flimsy sofa. Wayfair was a market darling when we were hunkering down at the start of the pandemic. We were going to spend a lot of time at home, so we were turning to the online retailer of furniture and other home essentials to get as comfortable as possible. A lot of folks also moved to the suburbs to get more bang for their real estate buck, and those new digs needed new pieces of furniture to make the house a home.It's a whole new world for Wayfair. Revenue growth has been negative for four consecutive quarters. The bottom line is getting worse. In just the last three months we've seen Wall Street estimates for losses more than double for 2022 and almost quadruple come next year. The new shift to enter physical retail won't be cheap. With sales expected to decline this year and profitability nowhere in sight it's hard to get excited about Wayfair despite its brand awareness and cool digital tools like letting shoppers use augmented reality to see what a potential purchase would look like in their actual room. Wayfair reports quarterly results on Thursday morning. The market's already bracing for a bad report, but sometimes that's not enough.TrueCarThe online lead generator for auto showrooms has been up on blocks lately. Revenue is going the wrong way. Losses are mounting. It has posted larger-than-expected deficits in back-to-back quarters. Analyst forecasts for red ink continue to grow. It's against this uninspiring backdrop that TrueCar reports its second-quarter financial results on Tuesday afternoon.TrueCar has run into a few speed bumps over the years. It has had to tweak its original shopper-friendly model to appeal to both buyers and showroom dealers, and that's a delicate balance. This is also a rough time to be selling vehicles with high gas prices and lean inventory for the hotter cars. The stock has shed nearly 90% of its value since peaking eight years ago, and it's hard to say that it isn't a lemon these days.Tesla MotorsThis is the third week in a row that Tesla Motors makes the cut. I was wrong the last two weeks. Is the third time the charm or the harm? The stock has risen this month despite a far from perfect quarterly update and a whirlwind of controversies and distractions.Tesla has outpaced the market the last two weeks as a high-beta stock on cruise control in a rising market. The stock's steep valuation seems immune to weakness in the general automotive market, and rising gas prices are naturally an incentive to go electric. After two weeks of big moves, I feel it's time for Tesla Motors to pull off the road and recharge. We'll see if I get burned again.It's going to be a bumpy road for some of these investments. If you're looking for safe stocks, you aren't likely to find them in Wayfair, TrueCar and Tesla Motors this week.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":976,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9908039482,"gmtCreate":1659293774146,"gmtModify":1676536281254,"author":{"id":"3581920930646755","authorId":"3581920930646755","name":"Chonky","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b26c78fb11a9e646bce483ea1b0d6f3","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581920930646755","idStr":"3581920930646755"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":2,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9908039482","repostId":"2255412085","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2255412085","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1659224690,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2255412085?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-31 07:44","market":"us","language":"en","title":"What’s in Store for Commodities After Losses in July?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2255412085","media":"MarketWatch","summary":"Wheat, oil prices decline for the month, but natural gas stages a rallyA farmer watches his burning ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Wheat, oil prices decline for the month, but natural gas stages a rally</p><p class=\"t-img-caption\"><img src=\"https://static.tigerbbs.com/c5e00e650419351dfff625afe0881051\" tg-width=\"700\" tg-height=\"463\" referrerpolicy=\"no-referrer\"/><span>A farmer watches his burning wheat field caused by the fighting at the front line in the Dnipropetrovsk region, Ukraine, Monday, July 4, 2022.</span></p><p>The pullback in most commodity prices in July, with wheat and oil among the decliners, might be an indication that inflation will soon reach its peak, and some commodities could be in store for further losses for the rest of this year.</p><p>Commodities look to post a second straight monthly loss following six consecutive months of gains. The S&amp;P Goldman Sachs Commodity index has lost nearly 4% this month as of July 28, but remains nearly 21% higher this year.</p><p>High inflation and monetary policy tightening by central banks are finally hitting consumer and industrial demand, which is “resulting in some demand destruction for most commodities and alleviating some of the upward pressure on prices,” says Matthew Sherwood, senior lead commodities analyst at the Economist Intelligence Unit. Most commodities prices are likely to “ease gradually for the rest of this year and next.”</p><blockquote>Most commodities prices are likely to “ease gradually for the rest of this year and next.”</blockquote><blockquote>— Matthew Sherwood, EIU</blockquote><p>Among the decliners, the S&amp;P GSCI Industrial Metals index lost more than 2% in July, with Comex copper off more than 6% and iron ore down nearly 18%.Iron oreand copper have been depressed due to weak economic activity associated with China’s zero-Covid strategy, says Shawn Reynolds, portfolio manager for VanEck’s active Natural Resources Equity Strategy.</p><p>Still, Reynolds says China’s economy and these metals prices are like a “coiled spring.” China has been providing “extensive stimulus measures on both the fiscal and monetary side.” That suggests a potential rise in demand for the metals.</p><p>The S&amp;P GSCI Agricultural index has lost nearly 4% month to date, with wheat futures down almost 8%.</p><p>Wheat prices hit decade-high levels after the Russian invasion of Ukraine in late February, coinciding with poor weather during the early part of the U.S. planting season, says Reynolds. A recent export agreement comes just as weather has turned positive for crops, he says.</p><p>Russia and Ukraine signed deals with Turkey and the United Nations that may clear the way for agricultural exports from both nations.</p><p>Still, “we see [Russian President Vladimir] Putin treating wheat and other ag products similarly to the way he is toying with Europe on the natural-gas front,” says Reynolds. Some of the big concerns include higher costs driven by natural gas and smaller fertilizer applications, which “could have a major impact on crop yields for the upcoming harvest season.” Russia is a major fertilizer producer, and the war in Ukraine disrupted global supplies.</p><p>Meanwhile, the S&amp;P GSCI Energy indexSPGSEN,+1.49%has also fallen by more than 4% in July, with global Brent crude down by nearly 7%. U.S. natural gas,however, trades roughly 50% higher for the month as hot weather boosts demand and Russia has cut supply to Europe.</p><p>There’s a disconnect between oil futures and physical oil markets. Futures investors are worried about the global economic slowdown and its demand impact, while those trading physical volumes face a very tight supply market, says Sherwood. He sees “extreme volatility,” but largely within a forecast range of $100 to $120 a barrel.</p><p>The physical market could fall back into a deficit over the rest of the summer, pulling prices higher, but a global economic slowdown would see prices begin to fall more significantly in 2023, he says. Sherwood expects most commodities prices to ease from current levels.</p><p>Reynolds, meanwhile, acknowledges demand risks associated with a potential recession, but believes that supply will continue to moderate as “recession risks encourage further capital discipline.”</p><p>Gold will strengthen as “concern over prolonged mild inflation sends investors looking for a store of value.” Natural gas, crude oil, and diesel are likely to perform well for the rest of this year and 2023, says Reynolds.</p></body></html>","source":"lsy1603348471595","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>What’s in Store for Commodities After Losses in July?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWhat’s in Store for Commodities After Losses in July?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2022-07-31 07:44 GMT+8&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<a href=https://www.marketwatch.com/story/whats-in-store-for-commodities-after-losses-in-july-11659106178?mod=hp_LATEST&adobe_mc=MCMID%3D11518004689257970023958560605767773727%7CMCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1659227790><strong>MarketWatch</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>Wheat, oil prices decline for the month, but natural gas stages a rallyA farmer watches his burning wheat field caused by the fighting at the front line in the Dnipropetrovsk region, Ukraine, Monday, ...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/whats-in-store-for-commodities-after-losses-in-july-11659106178?mod=hp_LATEST&adobe_mc=MCMID%3D11518004689257970023958560605767773727%7CMCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1659227790\">Web Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".DJI":"道琼斯",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index"},"source_url":"https://www.marketwatch.com/story/whats-in-store-for-commodities-after-losses-in-july-11659106178?mod=hp_LATEST&adobe_mc=MCMID%3D11518004689257970023958560605767773727%7CMCORGID%3DCB68E4BA55144CAA0A4C98A5%2540AdobeOrg%7CTS%3D1659227790","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2255412085","content_text":"Wheat, oil prices decline for the month, but natural gas stages a rallyA farmer watches his burning wheat field caused by the fighting at the front line in the Dnipropetrovsk region, Ukraine, Monday, July 4, 2022.The pullback in most commodity prices in July, with wheat and oil among the decliners, might be an indication that inflation will soon reach its peak, and some commodities could be in store for further losses for the rest of this year.Commodities look to post a second straight monthly loss following six consecutive months of gains. The S&P Goldman Sachs Commodity index has lost nearly 4% this month as of July 28, but remains nearly 21% higher this year.High inflation and monetary policy tightening by central banks are finally hitting consumer and industrial demand, which is “resulting in some demand destruction for most commodities and alleviating some of the upward pressure on prices,” says Matthew Sherwood, senior lead commodities analyst at the Economist Intelligence Unit. Most commodities prices are likely to “ease gradually for the rest of this year and next.”Most commodities prices are likely to “ease gradually for the rest of this year and next.”— Matthew Sherwood, EIUAmong the decliners, the S&P GSCI Industrial Metals index lost more than 2% in July, with Comex copper off more than 6% and iron ore down nearly 18%.Iron oreand copper have been depressed due to weak economic activity associated with China’s zero-Covid strategy, says Shawn Reynolds, portfolio manager for VanEck’s active Natural Resources Equity Strategy.Still, Reynolds says China’s economy and these metals prices are like a “coiled spring.” China has been providing “extensive stimulus measures on both the fiscal and monetary side.” That suggests a potential rise in demand for the metals.The S&P GSCI Agricultural index has lost nearly 4% month to date, with wheat futures down almost 8%.Wheat prices hit decade-high levels after the Russian invasion of Ukraine in late February, coinciding with poor weather during the early part of the U.S. planting season, says Reynolds. A recent export agreement comes just as weather has turned positive for crops, he says.Russia and Ukraine signed deals with Turkey and the United Nations that may clear the way for agricultural exports from both nations.Still, “we see [Russian President Vladimir] Putin treating wheat and other ag products similarly to the way he is toying with Europe on the natural-gas front,” says Reynolds. Some of the big concerns include higher costs driven by natural gas and smaller fertilizer applications, which “could have a major impact on crop yields for the upcoming harvest season.” Russia is a major fertilizer producer, and the war in Ukraine disrupted global supplies.Meanwhile, the S&P GSCI Energy indexSPGSEN,+1.49%has also fallen by more than 4% in July, with global Brent crude down by nearly 7%. U.S. natural gas,however, trades roughly 50% higher for the month as hot weather boosts demand and Russia has cut supply to Europe.There’s a disconnect between oil futures and physical oil markets. Futures investors are worried about the global economic slowdown and its demand impact, while those trading physical volumes face a very tight supply market, says Sherwood. He sees “extreme volatility,” but largely within a forecast range of $100 to $120 a barrel.The physical market could fall back into a deficit over the rest of the summer, pulling prices higher, but a global economic slowdown would see prices begin to fall more significantly in 2023, he says. Sherwood expects most commodities prices to ease from current levels.Reynolds, meanwhile, acknowledges demand risks associated with a potential recession, but believes that supply will continue to moderate as “recession risks encourage further capital discipline.”Gold will strengthen as “concern over prolonged mild inflation sends investors looking for a store of value.” Natural gas, crude oil, and diesel are likely to perform well for the rest of this year and 2023, says Reynolds.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":336,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9901677509,"gmtCreate":1659208573301,"gmtModify":1676536271291,"author":{"id":"3581920930646755","authorId":"3581920930646755","name":"Chonky","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/2b26c78fb11a9e646bce483ea1b0d6f3","crmLevel":2,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"authorIdStr":"3581920930646755","idStr":"3581920930646755"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Like","listText":"Like","text":"Like","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":3,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9901677509","repostId":"2255591547","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2255591547","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1659148200,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2255591547?lang=&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2022-07-30 10:30","market":"us","language":"en","title":"Elon Musk Files Response and Counterclaims to Twitter Lawsuit Over $44 Billion Deal","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2255591547","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Elon Musk formally responded to Twitter Inc.'s lawsuit seeking to force him to go through with his $","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Elon Musk formally responded to Twitter Inc.&#39;s lawsuit seeking to force him to go through with his $44 billion takeover of the social-media platform and included counterclaims against the company. The filing Friday was made confidentially and isn&#39;t viewable by the public.</p><p>It isn&#39;t unusual for counterclaims against a public company to be filed confidentially, pending review for possible redactions of sensitive information. The response and claims may be available as soon as next week.</p><p>One of counterclaims by Mr. Musk is expected to center on the allegation that Twitter changed its number of monetizable daily active users shortly after agreeing to the deal, and then didn&#39;t provide thorough responses to requests by Mr. Musk&#39;s team for data on the spam number, according to people familiar with the matter.</p><p>Mr. Musk&#39;s response Friday includes a reference to the Warren Buffett quote: &#34;Only when the tide goes out do you discover who&#39;s been swimming naked,&#34; the people said, a suggestion by Mr. Musk that Twitter has been obfuscating about spam and fake accounts because it knew the market downturn could reveal its weaknesses.</p><p>Mr. Musk&#39;s response Friday was filed hours after the judge overseeing the lawsuit against Mr. Musk set the week of Oct. 17 for a 5-day trial.</p><p>While Mr. Musk&#39;s answer and counterclaims to Twitter&#39;s lawsuit aren&#39;t immediately accessible, the billionaire chief executive officer of Tesla Inc. has been vocal about his reasons for wanting to walk away from the deal and indicated in previous regulatory and court filings how he may try to make his case for terminating the merger agreement.</p><p>Mr. Musk said in a regulatory filing earlier this month that he wanted out of the deal primarily because Twitter hadn&#39;t provided the necessary data and information he needs to assess the prevalence of fake or spam accounts.</p><p>Twitter rejected that assertion and argued that Mr. Musk hasn&#39;t adhered to the deal terms, including violating a nondisclosure agreement and then bragging about it on Twitter. The social-media company sued Mr. Musk on July 12 in Delaware Chancery Court, seeking to enforce the terms of the transaction.</p><p>In the regulatory filing to end the deal, Mr. Musk&#39;s lawyer cited concerns over Twitter&#39;s estimates about how many of its daily users are fake or spam accounts, an issue the billionaire had raised as a concern about the deal almost three weeks after he signed it. The company has said for years that it estimates fewer than 5% of its monetizable daily active users are spam and fake accounts, a figure Mr. Musk has disputed.</p><p>In a July 18 court filing opposing a request by Twitter for an expedited trial, the billionaire for the first time laid out publicly a clear timeline around his concerns over data about fake and spam accounts, and included new claims about Twitter&#39;s level of cooperation on the issue.</p><p>He said his team first became concerned about the company&#39;s user numbers after it disclosed in its April earnings report that it had overstated its user base for nearly three years through the end of 2021 because of an error in how it accounted for people linked to multiple accounts. The revision reduced the number of its monetizable daily active users by 0.9% for the fourth quarter of last year. The company last week said it averaged 237.8 million of such users in the most recent quarter.</p><p>According to that filing, Mr. Musk met with Twitter executives in May to discuss how the company measures spam and fake accounts and expressed dismay at the company&#39;s process and pointed to the absence of automated tools to help with the calculation.</p><p>Twitter said in its suit against Mr. Musk that his attempt to abandon the transaction reflects souring market conditions that resulted in his personal wealth declining by more than $100 billion from its November 2021 peak. &#34;Rather than bear the cost of the market downturn, as the merger agreement requires, Musk wants to shift it to Twitter&#39;s stockholders,&#34; the company said.</p><p>On July 19, Chancellor Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick, the chief judge of the Delaware Chancery Court, granted Twitter&#39;s request to fast-track its lawsuit over Mr. Musk&#39;s objections.</p><p>In a regulatory filing this week, Twitter said it would ask shareholders to vote on the merger at a meeting on Sept. 13. The company reiterated its commitment to completing the takeover at the agreed-upon price and said its board of directors has unanimously recommended that shareholders vote in favor of it. That process is running parallel to the legal case in Delaware that will determine whether the merger agreement can be enforced.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Elon Musk Files Response and Counterclaims to Twitter Lawsuit Over $44 Billion Deal</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nElon Musk Files Response and Counterclaims to Twitter Lawsuit Over $44 Billion Deal\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2022-07-30 10:30</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Elon Musk formally responded to Twitter Inc.&#39;s lawsuit seeking to force him to go through with his $44 billion takeover of the social-media platform and included counterclaims against the company. The filing Friday was made confidentially and isn&#39;t viewable by the public.</p><p>It isn&#39;t unusual for counterclaims against a public company to be filed confidentially, pending review for possible redactions of sensitive information. The response and claims may be available as soon as next week.</p><p>One of counterclaims by Mr. Musk is expected to center on the allegation that Twitter changed its number of monetizable daily active users shortly after agreeing to the deal, and then didn&#39;t provide thorough responses to requests by Mr. Musk&#39;s team for data on the spam number, according to people familiar with the matter.</p><p>Mr. Musk&#39;s response Friday includes a reference to the Warren Buffett quote: &#34;Only when the tide goes out do you discover who&#39;s been swimming naked,&#34; the people said, a suggestion by Mr. Musk that Twitter has been obfuscating about spam and fake accounts because it knew the market downturn could reveal its weaknesses.</p><p>Mr. Musk&#39;s response Friday was filed hours after the judge overseeing the lawsuit against Mr. Musk set the week of Oct. 17 for a 5-day trial.</p><p>While Mr. Musk&#39;s answer and counterclaims to Twitter&#39;s lawsuit aren&#39;t immediately accessible, the billionaire chief executive officer of Tesla Inc. has been vocal about his reasons for wanting to walk away from the deal and indicated in previous regulatory and court filings how he may try to make his case for terminating the merger agreement.</p><p>Mr. Musk said in a regulatory filing earlier this month that he wanted out of the deal primarily because Twitter hadn&#39;t provided the necessary data and information he needs to assess the prevalence of fake or spam accounts.</p><p>Twitter rejected that assertion and argued that Mr. Musk hasn&#39;t adhered to the deal terms, including violating a nondisclosure agreement and then bragging about it on Twitter. The social-media company sued Mr. Musk on July 12 in Delaware Chancery Court, seeking to enforce the terms of the transaction.</p><p>In the regulatory filing to end the deal, Mr. Musk&#39;s lawyer cited concerns over Twitter&#39;s estimates about how many of its daily users are fake or spam accounts, an issue the billionaire had raised as a concern about the deal almost three weeks after he signed it. The company has said for years that it estimates fewer than 5% of its monetizable daily active users are spam and fake accounts, a figure Mr. Musk has disputed.</p><p>In a July 18 court filing opposing a request by Twitter for an expedited trial, the billionaire for the first time laid out publicly a clear timeline around his concerns over data about fake and spam accounts, and included new claims about Twitter&#39;s level of cooperation on the issue.</p><p>He said his team first became concerned about the company&#39;s user numbers after it disclosed in its April earnings report that it had overstated its user base for nearly three years through the end of 2021 because of an error in how it accounted for people linked to multiple accounts. The revision reduced the number of its monetizable daily active users by 0.9% for the fourth quarter of last year. The company last week said it averaged 237.8 million of such users in the most recent quarter.</p><p>According to that filing, Mr. Musk met with Twitter executives in May to discuss how the company measures spam and fake accounts and expressed dismay at the company&#39;s process and pointed to the absence of automated tools to help with the calculation.</p><p>Twitter said in its suit against Mr. Musk that his attempt to abandon the transaction reflects souring market conditions that resulted in his personal wealth declining by more than $100 billion from its November 2021 peak. &#34;Rather than bear the cost of the market downturn, as the merger agreement requires, Musk wants to shift it to Twitter&#39;s stockholders,&#34; the company said.</p><p>On July 19, Chancellor Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick, the chief judge of the Delaware Chancery Court, granted Twitter&#39;s request to fast-track its lawsuit over Mr. Musk&#39;s objections.</p><p>In a regulatory filing this week, Twitter said it would ask shareholders to vote on the merger at a meeting on Sept. 13. The company reiterated its commitment to completing the takeover at the agreed-upon price and said its board of directors has unanimously recommended that shareholders vote in favor of it. That process is running parallel to the legal case in Delaware that will determine whether the merger agreement can be enforced.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2255591547","content_text":"Elon Musk formally responded to Twitter Inc.'s lawsuit seeking to force him to go through with his $44 billion takeover of the social-media platform and included counterclaims against the company. The filing Friday was made confidentially and isn't viewable by the public.It isn't unusual for counterclaims against a public company to be filed confidentially, pending review for possible redactions of sensitive information. The response and claims may be available as soon as next week.One of counterclaims by Mr. Musk is expected to center on the allegation that Twitter changed its number of monetizable daily active users shortly after agreeing to the deal, and then didn't provide thorough responses to requests by Mr. Musk's team for data on the spam number, according to people familiar with the matter.Mr. Musk's response Friday includes a reference to the Warren Buffett quote: \"Only when the tide goes out do you discover who's been swimming naked,\" the people said, a suggestion by Mr. Musk that Twitter has been obfuscating about spam and fake accounts because it knew the market downturn could reveal its weaknesses.Mr. Musk's response Friday was filed hours after the judge overseeing the lawsuit against Mr. Musk set the week of Oct. 17 for a 5-day trial.While Mr. Musk's answer and counterclaims to Twitter's lawsuit aren't immediately accessible, the billionaire chief executive officer of Tesla Inc. has been vocal about his reasons for wanting to walk away from the deal and indicated in previous regulatory and court filings how he may try to make his case for terminating the merger agreement.Mr. Musk said in a regulatory filing earlier this month that he wanted out of the deal primarily because Twitter hadn't provided the necessary data and information he needs to assess the prevalence of fake or spam accounts.Twitter rejected that assertion and argued that Mr. Musk hasn't adhered to the deal terms, including violating a nondisclosure agreement and then bragging about it on Twitter. The social-media company sued Mr. Musk on July 12 in Delaware Chancery Court, seeking to enforce the terms of the transaction.In the regulatory filing to end the deal, Mr. Musk's lawyer cited concerns over Twitter's estimates about how many of its daily users are fake or spam accounts, an issue the billionaire had raised as a concern about the deal almost three weeks after he signed it. The company has said for years that it estimates fewer than 5% of its monetizable daily active users are spam and fake accounts, a figure Mr. Musk has disputed.In a July 18 court filing opposing a request by Twitter for an expedited trial, the billionaire for the first time laid out publicly a clear timeline around his concerns over data about fake and spam accounts, and included new claims about Twitter's level of cooperation on the issue.He said his team first became concerned about the company's user numbers after it disclosed in its April earnings report that it had overstated its user base for nearly three years through the end of 2021 because of an error in how it accounted for people linked to multiple accounts. The revision reduced the number of its monetizable daily active users by 0.9% for the fourth quarter of last year. The company last week said it averaged 237.8 million of such users in the most recent quarter.According to that filing, Mr. Musk met with Twitter executives in May to discuss how the company measures spam and fake accounts and expressed dismay at the company's process and pointed to the absence of automated tools to help with the calculation.Twitter said in its suit against Mr. Musk that his attempt to abandon the transaction reflects souring market conditions that resulted in his personal wealth declining by more than $100 billion from its November 2021 peak. \"Rather than bear the cost of the market downturn, as the merger agreement requires, Musk wants to shift it to Twitter's stockholders,\" the company said.On July 19, Chancellor Kathaleen St. Jude McCormick, the chief judge of the Delaware Chancery Court, granted Twitter's request to fast-track its lawsuit over Mr. Musk's objections.In a regulatory filing this week, Twitter said it would ask shareholders to vote on the merger at a meeting on Sept. 13. The company reiterated its commitment to completing the takeover at the agreed-upon price and said its board of directors has unanimously recommended that shareholders vote in favor of it. That process is running parallel to the legal case in Delaware that will determine whether the merger agreement can be enforced.","news_type":1},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":433,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":true}