To The Moon
Home
News
TigerAI
Log In
Sign Up
ahyina
+Follow
Posts · 4
Posts · 4
Following · 0
Following · 0
Followers · 0
Followers · 0
ahyina
ahyina
·
2023-03-03
Great ariticle, would you like to share it?
The Secret to Stocks' Success so Far in 2023? An Unexpected $1 Trillion Liquidity Boost By Central Banks
Gains for global equities have left many on Wall Street perplexed as stocks -- especially high-risk
The Secret to Stocks' Success so Far in 2023? An Unexpected $1 Trillion Liquidity Boost By Central Banks
看
711
回复
Comment
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
ahyina
ahyina
·
2023-03-03
Nicee ,,, Good Job
The Secret to Stocks' Success so Far in 2023? An Unexpected $1 Trillion Liquidity Boost By Central Banks
Gains for global equities have left many on Wall Street perplexed as stocks -- especially high-risk
The Secret to Stocks' Success so Far in 2023? An Unexpected $1 Trillion Liquidity Boost By Central Banks
看
556
回复
Comment
点赞
17
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
ahyina
ahyina
·
2023-03-02
Okeeee
2 Stocks Down 55% and 71% to Buy Right Now
The bear market has created some rock-solid bargains. Here are two you should take advantage of.
2 Stocks Down 55% and 71% to Buy Right Now
看
641
回复
Comment
点赞
19
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
ahyina
ahyina
·
2023-03-02
https://scoin.click/r/110256
看
868
回复
Comment
点赞
Like
编组 21备份 2
Share
Report
Load more
Most Discussed
{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"isCurrentUser":false,"userPageInfo":{"id":"4140791216631382","uuid":"4140791216631382","gmtCreate":1677725679041,"gmtModify":1677725736643,"name":"ahyina","pinyin":"ahyina","introduction":"","introductionEn":"","signature":"","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","hat":null,"hatId":null,"hatName":null,"vip":1,"status":2,"fanSize":1,"headSize":1,"tweetSize":4,"questionSize":0,"limitLevel":999,"accountStatus":3,"level":{"id":1,"name":"萌萌虎","nameTw":"萌萌虎","represent":"呱呱坠地","factor":"评论帖子3次或发布1条主帖(非转发)","iconColor":"3C9E83","bgColor":"A2F1D9"},"themeCounts":0,"badgeCounts":0,"badges":[],"moderator":false,"superModerator":false,"manageSymbols":null,"badgeLevel":null,"boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"favoriteSize":0,"symbols":null,"coverImage":null,"realNameVerified":"init","userBadges":[],"userBadgeCount":0,"currentWearingBadge":null,"individualDisplayBadges":null,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"location":null,"starInvestorFollowerNum":0,"starInvestorFlag":false,"starInvestorOrderShareNum":0,"subscribeStarInvestorNum":0,"ror":null,"winRationPercentage":null,"showRor":false,"investmentPhilosophy":null,"starInvestorSubscribeFlag":false},"page":1,"watchlist":null,"tweetList":[{"id":9940816567,"gmtCreate":1677807356759,"gmtModify":1677807607695,"author":{"id":"4140791216631382","authorId":"4140791216631382","name":"ahyina","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4140791216631382","authorIdStr":"4140791216631382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","listText":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","text":"Great ariticle, would you like to share it?","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9940816567","repostId":"2316969587","repostType":4,"repost":{"id":"2316969587","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1677806965,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2316969587?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-03 09:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Secret to Stocks' Success so Far in 2023? An Unexpected $1 Trillion Liquidity Boost By Central Banks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2316969587","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Gains for global equities have left many on Wall Street perplexed as stocks -- especially high-risk ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Gains for global equities have left many on Wall Street perplexed as stocks -- especially high-risk growth names with little or no profits -- have rebounded from last year's punishing selloff, resisting both the pull of more attractive bond yields, and the threat of higher interest rates.</p><p>But some Wall Street analysts say they've found an explanation that has little to do with inflation and the state of the global economy.</p><p>The upshot is this: The Federal Reserve, European Central Bank and Bank of England have advertised that they're trying to drain the ocean of banking-system liquidity, but on a global scale, liquidity has actually increased in recent months. That's due in part to factors that are outside the control of policy makers.</p><h2>A trillion-dollar boost to asset prices</h2><p>In a research note shared with clients last month, Matt King, a global markets strategist at Citigroup Inc., detailed how the world's largest central banks had recently injected $1 trillion into the global financial system.</p><p>The bulk of this increase, according to King's analysis, came from the People's Bank of China, which has bucked the trend of global monetary tightening and instead opted to directly inject liquidity into its banking system, accounting for most of the $1 trillion figure.</p><p>"Even as the central banks have told us they're going to be tightening, it turns out that on at a global level, they've just added $1 trillion worth of liquidity over the past three months," King said.</p><p>In his report, King said he was inspired to take a closer look at central-bank balance sheets after concluding that changes in the fundamentals -- meaning the outlook for the economic growth and inflation -- failed to explain moves across global markets, including a rebound in global equity prices.</p><p>When he finally mapped moves in global equities against the shifting tides of global central bank liquidity, he found that they were a near-perfect fit.</p><p>The chart below tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index against the ebbs and flows of banking-system liquidity. The index has risen 12% since the end of September, according to FactSet data. Around the same time, global central bank liquidity stopped ebbing, and started expanding once more.</p><h2>U.S. bank reserves flat-line</h2><p>But even the Federal Reserve has contributed to the liquidity deluge in a more passive way, according to King and another London-based strategist, Michael Howell, managing director of CrossBorder Capital, a macro advisory firm.</p><p>For more than a year now, the Federal Reserve has been trumpeting its plans to "tighten" liquidity in the U.S. financial system by raising interest rates and reducing its bond holdings by opting not to reinvest the proceeds from maturing bonds.</p><p>And while the size of the Fed's bond holdings has shrunk since last spring by about $500 billion, according to data from the St. Louis Fed, another important component of its balance sheet, U.S. banking system reserves, appears to have flat-lined.</p><p>According to the latest weekly update released by the Fed, reserve balances at Federal Reserve banks stood at $3.01 trillion as of Feb 22. That's a modest increase from $2.9 trillion at the end of September.</p><p>"The Fed is supposedly rolling off the balance sheet, but bank reserves are not falling," Howell said.</p><p>This could also be helping to buttress equity prices as the amount of money available for U.S. banks to push into the financial system has expanded, instead of contracting, he said.</p><h2>Stocks coming off the boil</h2><p>To be sure, U.S. stocks have come off the boil in recent weeks following a torrid rally that resulted in the Nasdaq Composite rising more than 10% in January for its best start to a year in two decades, according to FactSet data.</p><p>That stocks are no longer climbing could be a sign that the liquidity tide is ebbing once again. Whether it will once again come to the market's rescue remains to be seen.</p><p>But it's certainly possible that ultimately, equity valuations could suffer as a result. According to Howell and his team, it's possible the Fed may need to hike interest rates more aggressively to compensate for its unwillingness to further cull banking system reserves.</p><p>After resisting their pull for a few weeks, U.S. stocks appear to be feeling the effects of higher bond yields. The Nasdaq Composite, S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average all lost ground in February. They were putting in a mixed performance on Thursday as the yield on the 10-year Treasury note topped 4%. Bond yields move inversely to prices.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Secret to Stocks' Success so Far in 2023? An Unexpected $1 Trillion Liquidity Boost By Central Banks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Secret to Stocks' Success so Far in 2023? An Unexpected $1 Trillion Liquidity Boost By Central Banks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2023-03-03 09:29</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Gains for global equities have left many on Wall Street perplexed as stocks -- especially high-risk growth names with little or no profits -- have rebounded from last year's punishing selloff, resisting both the pull of more attractive bond yields, and the threat of higher interest rates.</p><p>But some Wall Street analysts say they've found an explanation that has little to do with inflation and the state of the global economy.</p><p>The upshot is this: The Federal Reserve, European Central Bank and Bank of England have advertised that they're trying to drain the ocean of banking-system liquidity, but on a global scale, liquidity has actually increased in recent months. That's due in part to factors that are outside the control of policy makers.</p><h2>A trillion-dollar boost to asset prices</h2><p>In a research note shared with clients last month, Matt King, a global markets strategist at Citigroup Inc., detailed how the world's largest central banks had recently injected $1 trillion into the global financial system.</p><p>The bulk of this increase, according to King's analysis, came from the People's Bank of China, which has bucked the trend of global monetary tightening and instead opted to directly inject liquidity into its banking system, accounting for most of the $1 trillion figure.</p><p>"Even as the central banks have told us they're going to be tightening, it turns out that on at a global level, they've just added $1 trillion worth of liquidity over the past three months," King said.</p><p>In his report, King said he was inspired to take a closer look at central-bank balance sheets after concluding that changes in the fundamentals -- meaning the outlook for the economic growth and inflation -- failed to explain moves across global markets, including a rebound in global equity prices.</p><p>When he finally mapped moves in global equities against the shifting tides of global central bank liquidity, he found that they were a near-perfect fit.</p><p>The chart below tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index against the ebbs and flows of banking-system liquidity. The index has risen 12% since the end of September, according to FactSet data. Around the same time, global central bank liquidity stopped ebbing, and started expanding once more.</p><h2>U.S. bank reserves flat-line</h2><p>But even the Federal Reserve has contributed to the liquidity deluge in a more passive way, according to King and another London-based strategist, Michael Howell, managing director of CrossBorder Capital, a macro advisory firm.</p><p>For more than a year now, the Federal Reserve has been trumpeting its plans to "tighten" liquidity in the U.S. financial system by raising interest rates and reducing its bond holdings by opting not to reinvest the proceeds from maturing bonds.</p><p>And while the size of the Fed's bond holdings has shrunk since last spring by about $500 billion, according to data from the St. Louis Fed, another important component of its balance sheet, U.S. banking system reserves, appears to have flat-lined.</p><p>According to the latest weekly update released by the Fed, reserve balances at Federal Reserve banks stood at $3.01 trillion as of Feb 22. That's a modest increase from $2.9 trillion at the end of September.</p><p>"The Fed is supposedly rolling off the balance sheet, but bank reserves are not falling," Howell said.</p><p>This could also be helping to buttress equity prices as the amount of money available for U.S. banks to push into the financial system has expanded, instead of contracting, he said.</p><h2>Stocks coming off the boil</h2><p>To be sure, U.S. stocks have come off the boil in recent weeks following a torrid rally that resulted in the Nasdaq Composite rising more than 10% in January for its best start to a year in two decades, according to FactSet data.</p><p>That stocks are no longer climbing could be a sign that the liquidity tide is ebbing once again. Whether it will once again come to the market's rescue remains to be seen.</p><p>But it's certainly possible that ultimately, equity valuations could suffer as a result. According to Howell and his team, it's possible the Fed may need to hike interest rates more aggressively to compensate for its unwillingness to further cull banking system reserves.</p><p>After resisting their pull for a few weeks, U.S. stocks appear to be feeling the effects of higher bond yields. The Nasdaq Composite, S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average all lost ground in February. They were putting in a mixed performance on Thursday as the yield on the 10-year Treasury note topped 4%. Bond yields move inversely to prices.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2316969587","content_text":"Gains for global equities have left many on Wall Street perplexed as stocks -- especially high-risk growth names with little or no profits -- have rebounded from last year's punishing selloff, resisting both the pull of more attractive bond yields, and the threat of higher interest rates.But some Wall Street analysts say they've found an explanation that has little to do with inflation and the state of the global economy.The upshot is this: The Federal Reserve, European Central Bank and Bank of England have advertised that they're trying to drain the ocean of banking-system liquidity, but on a global scale, liquidity has actually increased in recent months. That's due in part to factors that are outside the control of policy makers.A trillion-dollar boost to asset pricesIn a research note shared with clients last month, Matt King, a global markets strategist at Citigroup Inc., detailed how the world's largest central banks had recently injected $1 trillion into the global financial system.The bulk of this increase, according to King's analysis, came from the People's Bank of China, which has bucked the trend of global monetary tightening and instead opted to directly inject liquidity into its banking system, accounting for most of the $1 trillion figure.\"Even as the central banks have told us they're going to be tightening, it turns out that on at a global level, they've just added $1 trillion worth of liquidity over the past three months,\" King said.In his report, King said he was inspired to take a closer look at central-bank balance sheets after concluding that changes in the fundamentals -- meaning the outlook for the economic growth and inflation -- failed to explain moves across global markets, including a rebound in global equity prices.When he finally mapped moves in global equities against the shifting tides of global central bank liquidity, he found that they were a near-perfect fit.The chart below tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index against the ebbs and flows of banking-system liquidity. The index has risen 12% since the end of September, according to FactSet data. Around the same time, global central bank liquidity stopped ebbing, and started expanding once more.U.S. bank reserves flat-lineBut even the Federal Reserve has contributed to the liquidity deluge in a more passive way, according to King and another London-based strategist, Michael Howell, managing director of CrossBorder Capital, a macro advisory firm.For more than a year now, the Federal Reserve has been trumpeting its plans to \"tighten\" liquidity in the U.S. financial system by raising interest rates and reducing its bond holdings by opting not to reinvest the proceeds from maturing bonds.And while the size of the Fed's bond holdings has shrunk since last spring by about $500 billion, according to data from the St. Louis Fed, another important component of its balance sheet, U.S. banking system reserves, appears to have flat-lined.According to the latest weekly update released by the Fed, reserve balances at Federal Reserve banks stood at $3.01 trillion as of Feb 22. That's a modest increase from $2.9 trillion at the end of September.\"The Fed is supposedly rolling off the balance sheet, but bank reserves are not falling,\" Howell said.This could also be helping to buttress equity prices as the amount of money available for U.S. banks to push into the financial system has expanded, instead of contracting, he said.Stocks coming off the boilTo be sure, U.S. stocks have come off the boil in recent weeks following a torrid rally that resulted in the Nasdaq Composite rising more than 10% in January for its best start to a year in two decades, according to FactSet data.That stocks are no longer climbing could be a sign that the liquidity tide is ebbing once again. Whether it will once again come to the market's rescue remains to be seen.But it's certainly possible that ultimately, equity valuations could suffer as a result. According to Howell and his team, it's possible the Fed may need to hike interest rates more aggressively to compensate for its unwillingness to further cull banking system reserves.After resisting their pull for a few weeks, U.S. stocks appear to be feeling the effects of higher bond yields. The Nasdaq Composite, S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average all lost ground in February. They were putting in a mixed performance on Thursday as the yield on the 10-year Treasury note topped 4%. Bond yields move inversely to prices.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":711,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9940816862,"gmtCreate":1677807290056,"gmtModify":1677807607453,"author":{"id":"4140791216631382","authorId":"4140791216631382","name":"ahyina","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4140791216631382","authorIdStr":"4140791216631382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Nicee ,,, Good Job","listText":"Nicee ,,, Good Job","text":"Nicee ,,, Good Job","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":17,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9940816862","repostId":"2316969587","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2316969587","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1677806965,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2316969587?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-03 09:29","market":"us","language":"en","title":"The Secret to Stocks' Success so Far in 2023? An Unexpected $1 Trillion Liquidity Boost By Central Banks","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2316969587","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Gains for global equities have left many on Wall Street perplexed as stocks -- especially high-risk ","content":"<html><head></head><body><p>Gains for global equities have left many on Wall Street perplexed as stocks -- especially high-risk growth names with little or no profits -- have rebounded from last year's punishing selloff, resisting both the pull of more attractive bond yields, and the threat of higher interest rates.</p><p>But some Wall Street analysts say they've found an explanation that has little to do with inflation and the state of the global economy.</p><p>The upshot is this: The Federal Reserve, European Central Bank and Bank of England have advertised that they're trying to drain the ocean of banking-system liquidity, but on a global scale, liquidity has actually increased in recent months. That's due in part to factors that are outside the control of policy makers.</p><h2>A trillion-dollar boost to asset prices</h2><p>In a research note shared with clients last month, Matt King, a global markets strategist at Citigroup Inc., detailed how the world's largest central banks had recently injected $1 trillion into the global financial system.</p><p>The bulk of this increase, according to King's analysis, came from the People's Bank of China, which has bucked the trend of global monetary tightening and instead opted to directly inject liquidity into its banking system, accounting for most of the $1 trillion figure.</p><p>"Even as the central banks have told us they're going to be tightening, it turns out that on at a global level, they've just added $1 trillion worth of liquidity over the past three months," King said.</p><p>In his report, King said he was inspired to take a closer look at central-bank balance sheets after concluding that changes in the fundamentals -- meaning the outlook for the economic growth and inflation -- failed to explain moves across global markets, including a rebound in global equity prices.</p><p>When he finally mapped moves in global equities against the shifting tides of global central bank liquidity, he found that they were a near-perfect fit.</p><p>The chart below tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index against the ebbs and flows of banking-system liquidity. The index has risen 12% since the end of September, according to FactSet data. Around the same time, global central bank liquidity stopped ebbing, and started expanding once more.</p><h2>U.S. bank reserves flat-line</h2><p>But even the Federal Reserve has contributed to the liquidity deluge in a more passive way, according to King and another London-based strategist, Michael Howell, managing director of CrossBorder Capital, a macro advisory firm.</p><p>For more than a year now, the Federal Reserve has been trumpeting its plans to "tighten" liquidity in the U.S. financial system by raising interest rates and reducing its bond holdings by opting not to reinvest the proceeds from maturing bonds.</p><p>And while the size of the Fed's bond holdings has shrunk since last spring by about $500 billion, according to data from the St. Louis Fed, another important component of its balance sheet, U.S. banking system reserves, appears to have flat-lined.</p><p>According to the latest weekly update released by the Fed, reserve balances at Federal Reserve banks stood at $3.01 trillion as of Feb 22. That's a modest increase from $2.9 trillion at the end of September.</p><p>"The Fed is supposedly rolling off the balance sheet, but bank reserves are not falling," Howell said.</p><p>This could also be helping to buttress equity prices as the amount of money available for U.S. banks to push into the financial system has expanded, instead of contracting, he said.</p><h2>Stocks coming off the boil</h2><p>To be sure, U.S. stocks have come off the boil in recent weeks following a torrid rally that resulted in the Nasdaq Composite rising more than 10% in January for its best start to a year in two decades, according to FactSet data.</p><p>That stocks are no longer climbing could be a sign that the liquidity tide is ebbing once again. Whether it will once again come to the market's rescue remains to be seen.</p><p>But it's certainly possible that ultimately, equity valuations could suffer as a result. According to Howell and his team, it's possible the Fed may need to hike interest rates more aggressively to compensate for its unwillingness to further cull banking system reserves.</p><p>After resisting their pull for a few weeks, U.S. stocks appear to be feeling the effects of higher bond yields. The Nasdaq Composite, S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average all lost ground in February. They were putting in a mixed performance on Thursday as the yield on the 10-year Treasury note topped 4%. Bond yields move inversely to prices.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>The Secret to Stocks' Success so Far in 2023? An Unexpected $1 Trillion Liquidity Boost By Central Banks</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nThe Secret to Stocks' Success so Far in 2023? An Unexpected $1 Trillion Liquidity Boost By Central Banks\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2023-03-03 09:29</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p>Gains for global equities have left many on Wall Street perplexed as stocks -- especially high-risk growth names with little or no profits -- have rebounded from last year's punishing selloff, resisting both the pull of more attractive bond yields, and the threat of higher interest rates.</p><p>But some Wall Street analysts say they've found an explanation that has little to do with inflation and the state of the global economy.</p><p>The upshot is this: The Federal Reserve, European Central Bank and Bank of England have advertised that they're trying to drain the ocean of banking-system liquidity, but on a global scale, liquidity has actually increased in recent months. That's due in part to factors that are outside the control of policy makers.</p><h2>A trillion-dollar boost to asset prices</h2><p>In a research note shared with clients last month, Matt King, a global markets strategist at Citigroup Inc., detailed how the world's largest central banks had recently injected $1 trillion into the global financial system.</p><p>The bulk of this increase, according to King's analysis, came from the People's Bank of China, which has bucked the trend of global monetary tightening and instead opted to directly inject liquidity into its banking system, accounting for most of the $1 trillion figure.</p><p>"Even as the central banks have told us they're going to be tightening, it turns out that on at a global level, they've just added $1 trillion worth of liquidity over the past three months," King said.</p><p>In his report, King said he was inspired to take a closer look at central-bank balance sheets after concluding that changes in the fundamentals -- meaning the outlook for the economic growth and inflation -- failed to explain moves across global markets, including a rebound in global equity prices.</p><p>When he finally mapped moves in global equities against the shifting tides of global central bank liquidity, he found that they were a near-perfect fit.</p><p>The chart below tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index against the ebbs and flows of banking-system liquidity. The index has risen 12% since the end of September, according to FactSet data. Around the same time, global central bank liquidity stopped ebbing, and started expanding once more.</p><h2>U.S. bank reserves flat-line</h2><p>But even the Federal Reserve has contributed to the liquidity deluge in a more passive way, according to King and another London-based strategist, Michael Howell, managing director of CrossBorder Capital, a macro advisory firm.</p><p>For more than a year now, the Federal Reserve has been trumpeting its plans to "tighten" liquidity in the U.S. financial system by raising interest rates and reducing its bond holdings by opting not to reinvest the proceeds from maturing bonds.</p><p>And while the size of the Fed's bond holdings has shrunk since last spring by about $500 billion, according to data from the St. Louis Fed, another important component of its balance sheet, U.S. banking system reserves, appears to have flat-lined.</p><p>According to the latest weekly update released by the Fed, reserve balances at Federal Reserve banks stood at $3.01 trillion as of Feb 22. That's a modest increase from $2.9 trillion at the end of September.</p><p>"The Fed is supposedly rolling off the balance sheet, but bank reserves are not falling," Howell said.</p><p>This could also be helping to buttress equity prices as the amount of money available for U.S. banks to push into the financial system has expanded, instead of contracting, he said.</p><h2>Stocks coming off the boil</h2><p>To be sure, U.S. stocks have come off the boil in recent weeks following a torrid rally that resulted in the Nasdaq Composite rising more than 10% in January for its best start to a year in two decades, according to FactSet data.</p><p>That stocks are no longer climbing could be a sign that the liquidity tide is ebbing once again. Whether it will once again come to the market's rescue remains to be seen.</p><p>But it's certainly possible that ultimately, equity valuations could suffer as a result. According to Howell and his team, it's possible the Fed may need to hike interest rates more aggressively to compensate for its unwillingness to further cull banking system reserves.</p><p>After resisting their pull for a few weeks, U.S. stocks appear to be feeling the effects of higher bond yields. The Nasdaq Composite, S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average all lost ground in February. They were putting in a mixed performance on Thursday as the yield on the 10-year Treasury note topped 4%. Bond yields move inversely to prices.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{".SPX":"S&P 500 Index",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite",".DJI":"道琼斯"},"source_url":"","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2316969587","content_text":"Gains for global equities have left many on Wall Street perplexed as stocks -- especially high-risk growth names with little or no profits -- have rebounded from last year's punishing selloff, resisting both the pull of more attractive bond yields, and the threat of higher interest rates.But some Wall Street analysts say they've found an explanation that has little to do with inflation and the state of the global economy.The upshot is this: The Federal Reserve, European Central Bank and Bank of England have advertised that they're trying to drain the ocean of banking-system liquidity, but on a global scale, liquidity has actually increased in recent months. That's due in part to factors that are outside the control of policy makers.A trillion-dollar boost to asset pricesIn a research note shared with clients last month, Matt King, a global markets strategist at Citigroup Inc., detailed how the world's largest central banks had recently injected $1 trillion into the global financial system.The bulk of this increase, according to King's analysis, came from the People's Bank of China, which has bucked the trend of global monetary tightening and instead opted to directly inject liquidity into its banking system, accounting for most of the $1 trillion figure.\"Even as the central banks have told us they're going to be tightening, it turns out that on at a global level, they've just added $1 trillion worth of liquidity over the past three months,\" King said.In his report, King said he was inspired to take a closer look at central-bank balance sheets after concluding that changes in the fundamentals -- meaning the outlook for the economic growth and inflation -- failed to explain moves across global markets, including a rebound in global equity prices.When he finally mapped moves in global equities against the shifting tides of global central bank liquidity, he found that they were a near-perfect fit.The chart below tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index against the ebbs and flows of banking-system liquidity. The index has risen 12% since the end of September, according to FactSet data. Around the same time, global central bank liquidity stopped ebbing, and started expanding once more.U.S. bank reserves flat-lineBut even the Federal Reserve has contributed to the liquidity deluge in a more passive way, according to King and another London-based strategist, Michael Howell, managing director of CrossBorder Capital, a macro advisory firm.For more than a year now, the Federal Reserve has been trumpeting its plans to \"tighten\" liquidity in the U.S. financial system by raising interest rates and reducing its bond holdings by opting not to reinvest the proceeds from maturing bonds.And while the size of the Fed's bond holdings has shrunk since last spring by about $500 billion, according to data from the St. Louis Fed, another important component of its balance sheet, U.S. banking system reserves, appears to have flat-lined.According to the latest weekly update released by the Fed, reserve balances at Federal Reserve banks stood at $3.01 trillion as of Feb 22. That's a modest increase from $2.9 trillion at the end of September.\"The Fed is supposedly rolling off the balance sheet, but bank reserves are not falling,\" Howell said.This could also be helping to buttress equity prices as the amount of money available for U.S. banks to push into the financial system has expanded, instead of contracting, he said.Stocks coming off the boilTo be sure, U.S. stocks have come off the boil in recent weeks following a torrid rally that resulted in the Nasdaq Composite rising more than 10% in January for its best start to a year in two decades, according to FactSet data.That stocks are no longer climbing could be a sign that the liquidity tide is ebbing once again. Whether it will once again come to the market's rescue remains to be seen.But it's certainly possible that ultimately, equity valuations could suffer as a result. According to Howell and his team, it's possible the Fed may need to hike interest rates more aggressively to compensate for its unwillingness to further cull banking system reserves.After resisting their pull for a few weeks, U.S. stocks appear to be feeling the effects of higher bond yields. The Nasdaq Composite, S&P 500 and Dow Jones Industrial Average all lost ground in February. They were putting in a mixed performance on Thursday as the yield on the 10-year Treasury note topped 4%. Bond yields move inversely to prices.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{".IXIC":0.9,".DJI":0.9,".SPX":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":556,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9940116138,"gmtCreate":1677747397725,"gmtModify":1677748036623,"author":{"id":"4140791216631382","authorId":"4140791216631382","name":"ahyina","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4140791216631382","authorIdStr":"4140791216631382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"Okeeee","listText":"Okeeee","text":"Okeeee","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":19,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9940116138","repostId":"2316618792","repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2316618792","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1677771117,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2316618792?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2023-03-02 23:31","market":"us","language":"en","title":"2 Stocks Down 55% and 71% to Buy Right Now","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2316618792","media":"Motley Fool","summary":"The bear market has created some rock-solid bargains. Here are two you should take advantage of.","content":"<div>\n<p>The stock market got off to a solid start in 2023, with the S&P 500 up nearly 4% (after being up as much as 9% early last month).Even with the good start, many individual stocks are still deep in bear...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/03/01/stocks-down-to-buy-right-now-3m-carparts/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n","source":"fool_stock","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>2 Stocks Down 55% and 71% to Buy Right Now</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\n2 Stocks Down 55% and 71% to Buy Right Now\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n2023-03-02 23:31 GMT+8 <a href=https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/03/01/stocks-down-to-buy-right-now-3m-carparts/><strong>Motley Fool</strong></a>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<div>\n<p>The stock market got off to a solid start in 2023, with the S&P 500 up nearly 4% (after being up as much as 9% early last month).Even with the good start, many individual stocks are still deep in bear...</p>\n\n<a href=\"https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/03/01/stocks-down-to-buy-right-now-3m-carparts/\">Source Link</a>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"PRTS":"CarParts","MMM":"3M"},"source_url":"https://www.fool.com/investing/2023/03/01/stocks-down-to-buy-right-now-3m-carparts/","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2316618792","content_text":"The stock market got off to a solid start in 2023, with the S&P 500 up nearly 4% (after being up as much as 9% early last month).Even with the good start, many individual stocks are still deep in bear market territory, and the Federal Reserve continues to telegraph its intention to keep raising interest rates, which seems even likelier after strong January employment and retail sales reports and a hotter-than-expected personal consumption expenditures reading, which is the Fed's favorite inflation gauge.The good news is that the pressure from rising interest rates and the prospects of a recession are making a lot of quality stocks cheap. Two Motley Fool contributors were asked to explain why 3M and CarParts.com, which are trading down 55% and 71%, respectively, from recent highs, both look like buys right now.Beyond some short-term legal risks, there is good value in 3M stockParkev Tatevosian: Trading down 55% off its high in 2019, now might be an excellent time for investors to consider 3M stock. The 121-year-old company profitably manufactures a diverse assortment of products that give it a presence across multiple industries and in several countries. While the troubled economy has had some effect on the stock price, much of the reason for its current reasonable valuation lies in concerns about its fiscal exposure to multiple lawsuits it is facing.Over decades, 3M has established itself in categories critical to enterprises and consumers. That's put it in a position to consistently deliver revenue topping $30 billion annually. More impressively, 3M has improved efficiencies in its business to expand its earnings per share from $6.72 in 2013 to $10.18 in 2022. Of course, rising profits allowed management to return capital to shareholders. Over the past decade, 3M's annual dividend per share has increased from $2.54 to $5.96.MMM PE Ratio (Forward) data by YChartsFortunately for investors, 3M stock is trading at a relative discount. Measuring by its forward price-to-earnings ratio of 12.46, 3M stock is selling at a valuation investors don't often see. Admittedly, the outcome of the litigation is a justifiable reason for the stock's decreased valuation, but the market may be overreacting to the news. This provides an excellent opportunity for long-term investors to capitalize on the lower price to add this dividend stock to their portfolios.CarParts.com: An under-the-radar e-commerce disruptorJeremy Bowman (CarParts.com): CarParts.com's revenue soared during the early stages of the pandemic, as the company was at the crossroads of two powerful pandemic tailwinds: e-commerce and auto parts. Consumers looked to online retail as they avoided shopping in stores, and auto parts sales also jumped as consumers took advantage of the extra time on their hands to fix up their vehicles. As a result, CarParts.com, the online auto parts retailer formerly known as U.S. Auto Parts, saw revenue growth nearly double in the fourth quarter of 2020 before decelerating as demand and the pandemic disruption normalized.Even as pandemic concerns ease, CarParts.com continues to grow its top line by double-digit percentages, taking market share in the industry, and it's improving its margins on the bottom line as well. In its third-quarter earnings report, revenue rose 16% year over year to $164.8 million, and gross profit increased 19% to $56.1 million. Its adjusted EBITDA also nearly tripled to $6.3 million.CarParts.com grew its business by adding new warehouses around the country so it can serve most of its customers with two-day delivery. It's also innovating with a new Do-It-For-Me service where the company is partnering with mechanics around the country who will seamlessly service customers who bring in CarParts.com parts, allowing them to save money as CarParts.com private-labels most of its merchandise, allowing it to undercut competitors on price.Additionally, the company should benefit from the current economic environment, as high interest rates are making new cars more expensive, encouraging car owners to repair their current vehicles rather than replace them. The auto parts sector also tends to do well in recessionary climates.Finally, the stock trades at a price-to-sales ratio of 0.6 and just 13 times adjusted EBITDA, making it cheap for a stock with its growth potential.If the company can continue growing the top and bottom lines, CarParts.com should be a winner from here.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"MMM":0.9,"PRTS":0.9}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":641,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0},{"id":9940376850,"gmtCreate":1677725997370,"gmtModify":1677726656782,"author":{"id":"4140791216631382","authorId":"4140791216631382","name":"ahyina","avatar":"https://community-static.tradeup.com/news/default-avatar.jpg","crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"followedFlag":false,"idStr":"4140791216631382","authorIdStr":"4140791216631382"},"themes":[],"htmlText":"https://scoin.click/r/110256","listText":"https://scoin.click/r/110256","text":"https://scoin.click/r/110256","images":[],"top":1,"highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/9940376850","isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":868,"authorTweetTopStatus":1,"verified":2,"comments":[],"imageCount":0,"langContent":"EN","totalScore":0}],"defaultTab":"posts","isTTM":true}