Key Facts and Figures from Asana's FY25 Earnings Calls:
Key Facts and Figures from Asana’s FY25 Earnings Calls
Revenue and Growth
Q1 FY25 Revenue:
$172.4 million, up 13% YoY
.
Q2 FY25 Revenue:
$177 million–$178 million (guidance), representing 9%-10% YoY growth
.
Reported revenue was slightly ahead of guidance
.
Q3 FY25 Revenue:
$183.9 million, up 10% YoY
.
Non-tech verticals grew 15% YoY, faster than overall growth
.
Customer Metrics
Core Customers:
Q1: 22,162 customers spending $5,000+ annually, contributing 74% of revenue, up from 73%
.
Q3: 23,609 core customers, representing 75% of revenue, up from 74% YoY
.
Enterprise Customers:
Q1: 607 customers spending $100,000+ annually, up 19% YoY
.
Q3: 683 customers in this cohort, up 18% YoY
.
Retention Rates:
Q1 DBNR:
Core: 102%, Overall: 100%, $100,000+ Customers: 108%
.
Stabilization achieved in Q3 across all major cohorts
.
Profitability Metrics
Gross Margins:
Consistently high at ~90% across the quarters (e.g., 89.8% in Q1 FY25)
.
Operating Loss (Non-GAAP):
Q1: $15.8 million (9% operating loss margin)
.
Q3: Operating loss margin improved to 4%, a YoY improvement
.
Net Loss:
Q1: $13.3 million, $0.06 per share
.
Cash Flow and Balance Sheet
Cash and Marketable Securities:
Q1 FY25: $524.3 million
.
Free Cash Flow:
Q1: Negative $4.3 million (improved from -11% to -2% margin YoY)
.
Q2: Positive $12.8 million (7% free cash flow margin)
.
Growth and Strategic Initiatives
AI Studio and Usage-Based Pricing:
Launched in Q3 FY25 with strong initial adoption in key verticals like technology, cybersecurity, and financial services
.
Consumption-based pricing model decouples revenue growth from seat-based licensing
.
Vertical-Specific Wins:
Key sectors with strong growth include manufacturing, energy, and healthcare
.
FedRAMP Certification:
Targeted to unlock opportunities in government and regulated industries
.
Guidance
Q4 FY25 Revenue Outlook:
Positive free cash flow expected by the end of FY25
.
Full-Year FY25:
Reacceleration anticipated with growth expected to strengthen in out-quarters driven by AI adoption and enterprise penetration
.
Data Points Requiring Further Verification
Growth Rate Projections:
The assumption of reacceleration in revenue growth depends heavily on AI Studio adoption, which remains early-stage.
Macroeconomic conditions affecting technology budgets could impact these projections.
Competitive Positioning:
Claims about being the “leader in AI collaborative work management” need comparative benchmarks against competitors like Monday.com, Smartsheet, and Jira
.
Retention Stabilization:
DBNR stabilization is reported, but sustaining it amid elongated sales cycles and budget constraints will need monitoring
.
Adoption of Usage-Based Pricing:
The revenue potential from AI Studio's usage-based pricing model is still emerging and relies on significant customer-scale implementations.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.