$Rocket Lab USA, Inc.(RKLB)$ $Eos Energy Enterprises Inc.(EOSE)$ π‘ππ₯ How I Enter βToo Strongβ Stocks: Pattern Memory, Gamma Triggers, and Space Force Tailwinds in $RKLB and $EOSE π₯ππ‘
Iβm extremely confident this isnβt just a high-conviction chart setup. Itβs a convergence of historical breakout geometry, institutional options flow, earnings volatility, and national defense tailwinds. Iβm not guessing; Iβm executing a thesis with multi-layered probability and real-world catalysts.
π $RKLB: From chart symmetry to Pentagon strategy
Rocket Lab ($RKLB) reports Q2 earnings on 08Aug25 after market close. Forecasts show:
β’ EPS: β$0.11 vs β$0.08 YoY
β’ Revenue: $135.4M
β’ EBIT: β$51.25M
β’ Gross margin trend: 25.56%
β’ Net margin: β39.18%
β’ Analysts: 4 recommend, 7 buy, 5 hold
β’ Price fluctuation Q2: +97.87%
β’ Mean PT: $37.04, High PT: $51.00
Despite losses, investor positioning says otherwise.
On 15Aug options expiry:
β’ $45C: 1.10K contracts, premium $3.65, delta 0.536, gamma 0.042
β’ $50C: 942 contracts, premium $1.93, open interest 8.40K
β’ Bulk buy order (15Aug $50C): 2,000 contracts, turnover $4.54M
β’ $55C: 2,000 contracts, $2.86M turnover
β’ Support: $28.53, Resistance: $48.63, Spot: $44.81
Gamma and vanna both steepen into the $50 to $55 cluster, showing convexity buildup. The 4H Bollinger/Keltner setup confirms: price recently tagged $56, retraced to $44, and is hugging the 55 EMA. No panic, just breathing before the next vertical.
π But hereβs the rocket fuel:
Rocket Labβs 2025 revenue forecast is $576M versus SpaceXβs $15.5B. Yet its $23B market cap gives it a P/S ratio of 40 compared to SpaceXβs 26. That compresses fast; by 2026, its P/S drops to 23 on projected $904M revenue. This isnβt overvalued, itβs front-loaded for expansion.
π‘ Golden Dome and Victus Haze: This is not retail hype
Space Force Gen. Michael Guetlein, appointed by Trump to lead Golden Dome missile defense, has already awarded $RKLB the Victus Haze contract, designed to test 24-hour responsive satellite launch and in-orbit interception. That mission launches this year.
CNN reports that Guetlein, who has unique autonomy in awarding contracts, is focused on scaling space-based interceptors. He explicitly said the technical challenge isnβt the physics; itβs the industrial base.
Guess who Space Command just visited? Rocket Lab.
Guess whoβs on Rocket Labβs board? A retired Space Force Lt. General.
This isnβt a matter of if. Theyβre already on the list.
π Projecting ahead:
Neutron, Rocket Labβs heavy-lift launch system, is projected to surpass Falcon 9βs pace. By 2035:
β’ Over 150 cumulative launches
β’ Just 25 first stages reused
β’ Two launches per month pace
This growth isnβt theoretical; itβs engineered. The pattern structure on the weekly chart mirrors this: a two-year base, parabolic climb, and projected continuation to $85 with wedge geometry confirming strength.
π $EOSE: Harmonic symmetry and structural setup strength
$EOSE continues to print a near-flawless harmonic bowl breakout. The current price ($5.42) sits in a structurally sound pullback zone after touching $6.60. On the 4H chart, price is coiled between mid-Bollinger and Keltner base layers with fading volume and trend EMAs holding.
This is a textbook volume-pocket reset before liftoff. The multi-year harmonic structure projects toward $46.44, and the current consolidation phase suggests trend integrity is being preserved, not broken. Analysts may not see it yet. The chart does.
π― Trade plan
β’ Iβm already long $RKLB with conviction. My preferred accumulation zone remains $44 to $46, breakout trigger $51, and upside target $85
β’ $EOSE: Buy zone $5.10 to $5.50, trigger $6.65, target $46.44
β’ Watch for MACD crossover, EMA hold, and volume burst above Bollinger mid-line
π§ This is why pattern memory matters
Iβm systematically cataloguing historically validated breakouts that combine geometry, options mechanics, and thematic catalysts. These are the setups where risk is defined but reward is exponential.
So when people ask me:
How do you enter a stock thatβs already gone vertical?
You enter when structure compresses, vanna steepens, and contract flow reveals intent, not when the green candle confirms your fear of missing out.
Which launchpad are you positioned on: $RKLB, $EOSE, or both?
π’ Donβt miss out! Like, Repost and Follow me for exclusive setups, cutting-edge trends, and insights that move markets ππ Iβm obsessed with hunting down the next big movers and sharing strategies that crush it. Letβs outsmart the market and stack those gains together! π
Trade like a boss! Happy trading ahead, Cheers, BC πππππ
@Tiger_comments @TigerStars @Tiger_Earnings @TigerObserver @TigerWire @Tiger_SG
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
Great article, would you like to share it?
Great article, would you like to share it?