Congress needs to be careful about which voices to follow on AI and China. Matt Pottinger’s hardline stance sounds reliable, but his credibility requires verification before accepting his views on AI chip exports to China. The individual has ties to $Alibaba(BABA)$ , a competitor of $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ in China. These companies might be paying Matt to push for a full ban, redirecting China’s AI demand to them instead of NVDA. China’s market demand is well-known. I hope Congress sees through such tactics and focuses on generating revenue for the US rather than China.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
