【POLL】85 Trades/Day — What Can Retail Investors Learn From the Trump's Rhythm?

【NEWS EVENT】

The U.S. Office of Government Ethics (OGE) just disclosed that President Donald Trump executed over 21,000 securities trades in 2025, with a total value between $600 million and $1.86 billion. Trump's team claims these assets are independently managed by third-party institutions through "automated, model-based portfolios," placing them in a so-called "blind trust."

Trump averaged 85 trades per market day in 2025, with a net purchase of approximately 300million in U.S. stocks for the full year. His holdings are heavily concentrated inTechnology( $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ , $Microsoft(MSFT)$ , $Apple(AAPL)$ , $Advanced Micro Devices(AMD)$ , $Intel(INTC)$ ) and Financials ( $Goldman Sachs(GS)$ ), operating across 8 separate accounts simultaneously.

OGE filings also show that on January 6, 2025, Trump purchased up to 1 millionin $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ stock. One week later, his administration loosened chip export controls to China. $NVDA surged. On that same day, he also bought $1M–5 Meachin $Microsoft(MSFT)$ , $Broadcom(AVGO)$ , and other tech names.

【THINKING 1】 Setting aside the ethics debate, the data itself is highly educational:

  • 1️⃣ Concentration beats Diversification: Over 70% of his portfolio is in Tech + Financials — a clear bet on the AI cycle and the financial sector's trajectory.

  • 2️⃣ Buying Into Volatility: 25% of all trades were clustered into just 10 days — all during periods of heightened market volatility. This suggests he treats policy uncertainty as a buying opportunity.

  • 3️⃣ Net Buyer Mindset: With ~$300M in net U.S. stock purchases for the year, he's accumulating — not panic-selling.

  • 4️⃣ Multi-Account Strategy: 8 accounts could indicate tax-loss harvesting, risk isolation, or rebalancing across custodians.

Which of these strategies are YOU already using? Which ones do you think are worth borrowing?

【THINKING 2】 If the person who knows policy direction better than anyone is putting 70%+ of his money into AI and Financials, that's a powerful signal in itself.

H2 2026 Outlook: → The AI infrastructure investment cycle is far from over (data centers, CPO, memory chips) → The Fed's policy path remains uncertain, and financials stand to benefit from the rate environment → But concentration risk is real — a single-sector pullback could devastate the portfolio

The question is: When "policy alpha" and "valuation bubble" exist at the same time, which side do you choose?

【POLL 1】 For H2 2026, will you follow Trump's sector allocation?

🔘 A. Yes — AI + Financials is still the main theme. I'm going heavy.

🔘 B. I'll reference it but reduce concentration and add defensive positions.

🔘 C. No — his informational edge is something I can't replicate.

🔘 D. I only buy indices. No individual stock bets. 🎯

Cast your vote 👇

Pick one or two and tell us why 👇

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment13

  • Top
  • Latest
  • Cadi Poon
    ·07-08 23:52
    TOP
    The U.S. Office of Government Ethics (OGE) just disclosed that President Donald Trump executed over 21,000 securities trades in 2025, with a total value between $600 million and $1.86 billion. Trump's team claims these assets are independently managed by third-party institutions through "automated, model-based portfolios," placing them in a so-called "blind trust."
    Reply
    Report
  • Shyon
    ·07-08 19:16
    I'm leaning toward B. I agree AI and Financials remain two of the strongest long-term themes, but I wouldn't mirror someone else's concentrated portfolio. I continue adding to AI infrastructure names during pullbacks because I believe the demand for compute, memory, networking, and enterprise AI is still in its early stages. At the same time, I prefer managing risk through diversification.

    One strategy I already use is buying into volatility. When quality companies correct without a major change in fundamentals, I see it as an opportunity to average up or DCA into my highest-conviction positions. Volatility often creates attractive entry points for long-term investors.

    In the end, I don't invest based on who is buying. I focus on business quality, earnings growth, valuation, and long-term trends. Trump's allocation is an interesting signal, but I still rely on a disciplined investment process that I can stick with in any market.

    @TigerStars @TigerClub @Tiger_comments

    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·00:29
    所以,如果让我选择,我会偏向B——参考他的行业方向,但降低集中度。我仍然看好2026年下半年的AI基础设施、数据中心、CPO、存储芯片,以及部分优质金融股,但会搭配指数ETF或现金部位控制风险。投资最重要的不是猜对一次,而是在长期周期里持续活下来,这样才能真正享受到AI时代带来的复利回报。
    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·00:29
    不过,我不会完全照抄他的配置。毕竟他的政策资讯、资源和团队都不是普通投资者能够复制的,而且AI板块经过两年大涨后,估值已经不便宜。如果未来成长稍微放缓,高估值股票回调幅度也可能非常惊人。
    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·00:29
    大量交易发生在市场波动最剧烈的时候,代表他把恐慌视为布局机会,而不是跟着市场情绪追涨杀跌。这一点其实比选股更值得学习,真正赚钱的人,往往是在别人害怕时慢慢累积筹码。
    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·00:28
    很多投资者习惯什么都买一点,结果涨的时候跑不赢,跌的时候也没少跌。反而特朗普的配置,更像是在最有把握的产业趋势上重仓下注,认定AI仍是未来几年美国经济最重要的增长引擎,而金融则受惠于利率环境与资本市场活跃度。
    Reply
    Report
  • 北极篂
    ·00:28
    如果单看这份交易纪录,不谈伦理争议,我觉得真正值得研究的不是特朗普买了什么,而是他的投资逻辑。首先,他的持仓高度集中在AI科技和金融,并没有刻意追求所谓“越分散越安全”。
    Reply
    Report
  • WanEH
    ·07-08 19:15
    B.我会参考它,但减少浓度,增加防守位置。没办法,特郎普是造成起伏的主要推手。但是我们又是消息迟滞的散户。所以只能减少跟他的比例。
    Reply
    Report
  • Alubin
    ·07-08 19:57
    Going for D. I’m more conservative and I believe more of Time in the market beats timing the market.
    Reply
    Report
  • 川普: 我真的不是股神
    Reply
    Report
  • 嘿嘿鱼
    ·07-08 21:27
    D
    Reply
    Report