SG Z74

1
Comment
Favorite

Sizeon
08-03 14:30

SG Z74

Who Says the Stock Market is Overpriced?

Despite equity valuation ratios that suggest stocks are in nosebleed territory, it's actually a good bet the market will produce decent returns over the next decade. That's the implication of a recent

Who Says the Stock Market is Overpriced?

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment

Top
Latest

No comments yet

Most Discussed

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":592741764969672,"tweetId":"592741764969672","gmtCreate":1785738601357,"gmtModify":1785741502925,"author":{"id":4248724344277892,"idStr":"4248724344277892","authorId":4248724344277892,"authorIdStr":"4248724344277892","name":"Sizeon","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/default-avatar2.jpg","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":1,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"wearingBadges":[],"fanSize":0,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"title":"","html":"<html><head></head><body><p>SG Z74</p></body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body><p>SG Z74</p></body></html>","text":"SG Z74","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":1,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/592741764969672","repostId":2656328830,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2656328830","kind":"highlight","weMediaInfo":{"introduction":"Dow Jones publishes the world’s most trusted business news and financial information in a variety of media.","home_visible":0,"media_name":"Dow Jones","id":"106","head_image":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99"},"pubTimestamp":1785735791,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2656328830?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2026-08-03 13:43","market":"hk","language":"en","title":"Who Says the Stock Market is Overpriced?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2656328830","media":"Dow Jones","summary":"Despite equity valuation ratios that suggest stocks are in nosebleed territory, it's actually a good bet the market will produce decent returns over the next decade. That's the implication of a recent","content":"<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Despite equity valuation ratios that suggest stocks are in nosebleed territory, it&#39;s actually a good bet the market will produce decent returns over the next decade. That&#39;s the implication of a recently completed study that argues investors have been incorrectly interpreting stock market valuation formulas -- such as the price/earnings ratio; the cyclically adjusted P/E, or CAPE, ratio; the dividend yield; and the Buffett Indicator, to name a few. Entitled &#34; The Hidden Trend in Stock-Market Cash Flows,&#34; the study was conducted by Sebastian Hillenbrand of Harvard&#39;s Business School and Odhrain McCarthy of NYU&#39;s Stern School of Business.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Consider the P/E ratio, which for the S&amp;P 500 index currently stands at 25.2 -- suggesting significant overvaluation. After all, it is far higher than the average of 16.2 since 1871, according to data from Yale University&#39;s Robert Shiller, and higher than 92% of all prior monthly readings back to 1871.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">That analysis is misguided, according to the professors. Their core argument is that valuation ratios&#39; fluctuations are caused by two separate developments, and Wall Street largely focuses on just one of these two: the well-known market cycle that oscillates between bull and bear markets. From this perspective, a higher ratio -- such as the P/E -- indicates that the market has become more richly valued and its expected future returns have become correspondingly lower.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">The second development -- the one that&#39;s largely ignored -- is the long-term trend of increasing earnings growth rates. According to the study&#39;s authors, a higher valuation ratio does not necessarily mean that the market&#39;s expected future return has deteriorated -- but could instead mean that corporate earnings are expected to grow at even faster pace in coming years.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Consider that recent decades&#39; average P/E ratio is nearly double what prevailed 150 years ago. The S&amp;P 500&#39;s average P/E over the past 30 years is 25.7, for example, versus 14.7 over the last 30 years of the 19th century. Some of the increase since then undoubtedly reflects a faster earnings growth rate.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">In recent decades, as you can see from the chart below, the S&amp;P 500&#39;s earnings per share have grown at a 7.0% annualized pace; the comparable pace over the last decades of the 19th century was an annualized 0.6%. The P/E ratio therefore deserves to be markedly higher -- to compare its current level with what prevailed more than a century ago is comparing apples and oranges.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">It&#39;s not easy to separate out what portion of today&#39;s higher P/E ratio is due to increasing valuation and how much is due to a faster earnings-growth rate. The professors employed sophisticated statistical methods to do that, and interested readers are directed to their study for details. But the bottom line, Hillenbrand told Barron&#39;s in an interview, is that the forecasting power of the valuation ratios jumps markedly once you adjust for the effects of faster earnings growth. Absent that, Hillenbrand pointed out, most of the most popular valuation ratios have out-of-sample track records that are statistically indistinguishable from a coin flip.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">There&#39;s another consequence of adjusting valuation ratios for the long-term trend toward faster earnings-growth rates: It increases their forecasted returns. To illustrate, Hillenbrand calculated the five- and 10-year return forecasts of the unadjusted P/E ratio. Absent that adjustment, the stock market is projected to be largely flat in coming years. After adjusting, according to Hillenbrand, the stock market&#39;s forecasted five-year return grows to 7.0% annualized, and the forecast 10-year return grows to 7.7% annualized.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Though these returns are modestly below the stock market&#39;s long-term average of around 10% annualized, they are far better than the negative returns that many of the valuation indicators are otherwise forecasting.</p></body></html>","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Who Says the Stock Market is Overpriced?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 11px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;line-height: 11px;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nWho Says the Stock Market is Overpriced?\n</h2>\n\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n\n<div class=\"head\" \">\n\n\n<div class=\"h-thumb\" style=\"background-image:url(https://static.tigerbbs.com/150f88aa4d182df19190059f4a365e99);background-size:cover;\"></div>\n\n<div class=\"h-content\">\n<p class=\"h-name\">Dow Jones </p>\n<p class=\"h-time\">2026-08-03 13:43</p>\n</div>\n\n</div>\n\n\n</h4>\n\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><head></head><body><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Despite equity valuation ratios that suggest stocks are in nosebleed territory, it&#39;s actually a good bet the market will produce decent returns over the next decade. That&#39;s the implication of a recently completed study that argues investors have been incorrectly interpreting stock market valuation formulas -- such as the price/earnings ratio; the cyclically adjusted P/E, or CAPE, ratio; the dividend yield; and the Buffett Indicator, to name a few. Entitled &#34; The Hidden Trend in Stock-Market Cash Flows,&#34; the study was conducted by Sebastian Hillenbrand of Harvard&#39;s Business School and Odhrain McCarthy of NYU&#39;s Stern School of Business.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Consider the P/E ratio, which for the S&amp;P 500 index currently stands at 25.2 -- suggesting significant overvaluation. After all, it is far higher than the average of 16.2 since 1871, according to data from Yale University&#39;s Robert Shiller, and higher than 92% of all prior monthly readings back to 1871.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">That analysis is misguided, according to the professors. Their core argument is that valuation ratios&#39; fluctuations are caused by two separate developments, and Wall Street largely focuses on just one of these two: the well-known market cycle that oscillates between bull and bear markets. From this perspective, a higher ratio -- such as the P/E -- indicates that the market has become more richly valued and its expected future returns have become correspondingly lower.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">The second development -- the one that&#39;s largely ignored -- is the long-term trend of increasing earnings growth rates. According to the study&#39;s authors, a higher valuation ratio does not necessarily mean that the market&#39;s expected future return has deteriorated -- but could instead mean that corporate earnings are expected to grow at even faster pace in coming years.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Consider that recent decades&#39; average P/E ratio is nearly double what prevailed 150 years ago. The S&amp;P 500&#39;s average P/E over the past 30 years is 25.7, for example, versus 14.7 over the last 30 years of the 19th century. Some of the increase since then undoubtedly reflects a faster earnings growth rate.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">In recent decades, as you can see from the chart below, the S&amp;P 500&#39;s earnings per share have grown at a 7.0% annualized pace; the comparable pace over the last decades of the 19th century was an annualized 0.6%. The P/E ratio therefore deserves to be markedly higher -- to compare its current level with what prevailed more than a century ago is comparing apples and oranges.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">It&#39;s not easy to separate out what portion of today&#39;s higher P/E ratio is due to increasing valuation and how much is due to a faster earnings-growth rate. The professors employed sophisticated statistical methods to do that, and interested readers are directed to their study for details. But the bottom line, Hillenbrand told Barron&#39;s in an interview, is that the forecasting power of the valuation ratios jumps markedly once you adjust for the effects of faster earnings growth. Absent that, Hillenbrand pointed out, most of the most popular valuation ratios have out-of-sample track records that are statistically indistinguishable from a coin flip.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">There&#39;s another consequence of adjusting valuation ratios for the long-term trend toward faster earnings-growth rates: It increases their forecasted returns. To illustrate, Hillenbrand calculated the five- and 10-year return forecasts of the unadjusted P/E ratio. Absent that adjustment, the stock market is projected to be largely flat in coming years. After adjusting, according to Hillenbrand, the stock market&#39;s forecasted five-year return grows to 7.0% annualized, and the forecast 10-year return grows to 7.7% annualized.</p><p style=\"text-align: left;\">Though these returns are modestly below the stock market&#39;s long-term average of around 10% annualized, they are far better than the negative returns that many of the valuation indicators are otherwise forecasting.</p></body></html>\n\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"","relate_stocks":{"SH":"做空标普500-Proshares","TACU":"T. Rowe Price Active Core U.S. Equity ETF","JOYT":"JPMorgan Equity and Options Total Return ETF","TSPA":"T. Rowe Price U.S. Equity Research ETF","SPXS":"三倍做空标普500ETF-Direxion","UPRO":"三倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","SPYH":"Neos S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF",".DJI":"道琼斯","DMAX":"ISHARES LARGE CAP MAX BUFFER DEC ETF","GXDW":"Global X Dorsey Wright Thematic ETF","SPUU":"Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2x Shares","IVV":"标普500ETF-iShares",".IXIC":"NASDAQ Composite","UDOW":"三倍做多道指30ETF-ProShares","SPDN":"Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bear 1X Shares","SPXU":"三倍做空标普500ETF-ProShares","RGLO":"Global Equity Active ETF","SPYM":"投资组合标普500指数ETF-SPDR","VOTE":"TCW Transform 500 ETF","DXD":"两倍做空道琼30指数ETF-ProShares",".SPX":"S&P 500 Index","PMDE":"PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - December","YSPY":"GraniteShares YieldBOOST SPY ETF","DOG":"道指ETF-ProShares做空","SPYQ":"2倍做多SPY Quarterly ETF-Tradr","DIA":"道琼斯ETF","DDM":"2倍做多道指ETF-ProShares","SDS":"两倍做空标普500 ETF-ProShares","FEBU":"AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Feb ETF","SMAX":"ISHARES LARGE CAP MAX BUFFER SEP ETF","SPY":"标普500ETF","SPYU":"MAX S&P 500 4X Leveraged ETN","MMAX":"iShares Large Cap Max Buffer Mar ETF","HIBL":"Direxion Daily S&P 500 High Beta Bull 3X Shares","SSO":"2倍做多标普500ETF-ProShares","VGFPF":"Vanguard Funds PLC","SDOW":"三倍做空道指30ETF-ProShares","DECU":"AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 Uncapped Dec ETF","VOO":"Vanguard标普500ETF","CDIG":"City Different Investments Global Equity ETF","SPXL":"三倍做多标普500ETF-Direxion"},"source_url":"https://dowjonesnews.com/newdjn/logon.aspx?AL=N","is_english":true,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2656328830","content_text":"Despite equity valuation ratios that suggest stocks are in nosebleed territory, it's actually a good bet the market will produce decent returns over the next decade. That's the implication of a recently completed study that argues investors have been incorrectly interpreting stock market valuation formulas -- such as the price/earnings ratio; the cyclically adjusted P/E, or CAPE, ratio; the dividend yield; and the Buffett Indicator, to name a few. Entitled \" The Hidden Trend in Stock-Market Cash Flows,\" the study was conducted by Sebastian Hillenbrand of Harvard's Business School and Odhrain McCarthy of NYU's Stern School of Business.Consider the P/E ratio, which for the S&P 500 index currently stands at 25.2 -- suggesting significant overvaluation. After all, it is far higher than the average of 16.2 since 1871, according to data from Yale University's Robert Shiller, and higher than 92% of all prior monthly readings back to 1871.That analysis is misguided, according to the professors. Their core argument is that valuation ratios' fluctuations are caused by two separate developments, and Wall Street largely focuses on just one of these two: the well-known market cycle that oscillates between bull and bear markets. From this perspective, a higher ratio -- such as the P/E -- indicates that the market has become more richly valued and its expected future returns have become correspondingly lower.The second development -- the one that's largely ignored -- is the long-term trend of increasing earnings growth rates. According to the study's authors, a higher valuation ratio does not necessarily mean that the market's expected future return has deteriorated -- but could instead mean that corporate earnings are expected to grow at even faster pace in coming years.Consider that recent decades' average P/E ratio is nearly double what prevailed 150 years ago. The S&P 500's average P/E over the past 30 years is 25.7, for example, versus 14.7 over the last 30 years of the 19th century. Some of the increase since then undoubtedly reflects a faster earnings growth rate.In recent decades, as you can see from the chart below, the S&P 500's earnings per share have grown at a 7.0% annualized pace; the comparable pace over the last decades of the 19th century was an annualized 0.6%. The P/E ratio therefore deserves to be markedly higher -- to compare its current level with what prevailed more than a century ago is comparing apples and oranges.It's not easy to separate out what portion of today's higher P/E ratio is due to increasing valuation and how much is due to a faster earnings-growth rate. The professors employed sophisticated statistical methods to do that, and interested readers are directed to their study for details. But the bottom line, Hillenbrand told Barron's in an interview, is that the forecasting power of the valuation ratios jumps markedly once you adjust for the effects of faster earnings growth. Absent that, Hillenbrand pointed out, most of the most popular valuation ratios have out-of-sample track records that are statistically indistinguishable from a coin flip.There's another consequence of adjusting valuation ratios for the long-term trend toward faster earnings-growth rates: It increases their forecasted returns. To illustrate, Hillenbrand calculated the five- and 10-year return forecasts of the unadjusted P/E ratio. Absent that adjustment, the stock market is projected to be largely flat in coming years. After adjusting, according to Hillenbrand, the stock market's forecasted five-year return grows to 7.0% annualized, and the forecast 10-year return grows to 7.7% annualized.Though these returns are modestly below the stock market's long-term average of around 10% annualized, they are far better than the negative returns that many of the valuation indicators are otherwise forecasting.","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"UPRO":0.6,"RGLO":0.85,".SPX":2,"FEBU":0.85,"YSPY":0.6,"CDIG":0.9,"HIBL":0.6,"SMAX":0.6,"SPYM":0.6,".DJI":2,"SPDN":0.6,"VOTE":0.85,"DMAX":0.6,"SH":0.6,"SDOW":0.6,"SPYQ":0.6,"SPUU":0.6,"IVV":0.6,"SPXL":0.6,"DDM":0.6,"DOG":0.6,"TACU":0.9,"DECU":0.85,"SSO":0.6,".IXIC":2,"SDS":0.6,"SPXU":0.6,"SPY":0.6,"SPXS":0.6,"TSPA":0.9,"VOO":0.6,"DXD":0.6,"JOYT":0.85,"GXDW":0.85,"SPYU":0.6,"PMDE":0.85,"MMAX":0.6,"UDOW":0.6,"DIA":0.6,"VGFPF":0.85,"SPYH":0.6}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":14,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":5,"optionInvolvedFlag":false,"subscribersOnly":false,"subscribersOnlyAccessible":false,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}