To The Moon

$NVIDIA(NVDA)$  

Something extraordinary happened on Wall Street yesterday.

Nasdaq:

+2.74%.

S&P 500:

+2.35%.

Broadcom:

+8.78%.

Micron:

+6.25%.

But Nvidia?

-4.27%.

Closing at:

$178.67.

And during the session, NVDA plunged to:

$170.24.

Think about that.

The semiconductor sector was recovering.

Investors were returning to beaten-down technology stocks.

Yet the world's most influential AI chipmaker was still falling.

That's approximately:

7 PERCENTAGE POINTS OF UNDERPERFORMANCE AGAINST THE NASDAQ.

So has Nvidia become a bargain?

Or is the market seeing something that dip buyers are overlooking?

I think the answer is hidden in three things.

TRUST. VOLUME. AND EARNINGS.

And I wouldn't ignore any of them.

🚨 FIRST, JENSEN HUANG'S CONTROVERSY IS NO LONGER JUST ABOUT HIS PRIVATE LIFE

Jensen Huang has publicly acknowledged being unfaithful to his wife and apologised to his family, employees and shareholders.

But here's the important distinction.

The more material investment question concerns the possibility that Huang was targeted by a foreign intelligence operation.

On November 8, Nvidia's board announced an independent investigation, overseen by independent directors and outside counsel.

The board also stated that it currently has no reason to believe national security or Nvidia's secrets were compromised.

That matters.

Because:

AN INVESTIGATION IS NOT PROOF OF WRONGDOING.

And personal misconduct is not automatically evidence of corporate misconduct.

However, Monday brought another development.

A proposed shareholder class-action lawsuit was filed, alleging that Nvidia and Huang failed to disclose information relevant to national security and business risks.

These are allegations, not established facts.

Still, this creates three uncertainties for investors.

1. GOVERNANCE RISK

Can the board demonstrate strong oversight and information safeguards?

2. KEY-PERSON RISK

How dependent is Nvidia's strategy and investor confidence on Huang personally?

3. REGULATORY RISK

Could the investigation create additional scrutiny around sensitive technology and export controls?

I don't think investors should automatically assume the worst.

But I also wouldn't dismiss these questions as mere gossip.

A GREAT CEO CAN BUILD AN EXTRAORDINARY COMPANY.

BUT NO COMPANY SHOULD BE ENTIRELY DEPENDENT ON ONE PERSON.

🔥 THE BUSINESS HAS NOT SUDDENLY COLLAPSED

Here's why I'm not abandoning Nvidia's fundamental thesis.

Its latest quarterly revenue was:

$96.22 BILLION.

Up:

106% YoY.

Data-centre revenue:

$89 BILLION.

Up:

117% YoY.

And management's Q3 revenue guidance?

$108 BILLION ±2%.

With an expected gross margin of approximately:

74%.

These are extraordinary numbers.

A personal controversy hasn't suddenly cancelled orders for GPUs.

It hasn't eliminated AI training or inference demand.

And it hasn't automatically changed the need for Nvidia's computing platforms.

But here's the catch.

EXCEPTIONAL EARNINGS DO NOT MAKE A STOCK IMMUNE TO GOVERNANCE RISK.

Investors may demand a lower valuation multiple while uncertainty persists.

Even if revenue keeps growing.

And that is why I am separating the business from the stock price.

🧠 THE MOST INTERESTING NUMBER FROM MONDAY IS ACTUALLY 455 MILLION

Approximately:

455 MILLION SHARES

changed hands on November 9.

Friday's volume?

Approximately:

180 MILLION.

That's more than:

2.5 TIMES FRIDAY'S VOLUME.

Now look at the price action.

Intraday low:

$170.24.

Closing price:

$178.67.

A recovery of almost:

5% FROM THE LOW.

Interesting.

Because despite the heavy selling, buyers managed to lift Nvidia substantially off its intraday low.

Could this be early accumulation?

Possibly.

But high volume alone cannot tell us whether institutions were accumulating, distributing or simply repositioning.

And here's the crucial warning.

Nvidia's impressive intraday recovery happened while the wider market rallied strongly.

Yet the stock still finished deeply red.

So I see:

EARLY SIGNS OF BUYER INTEREST.

But NOT:

A CONFIRMED BOTTOM.

For me, $170.24 is now an extremely important reference level.

If buyers defend it and Nvidia begins outperforming the broader semiconductor sector?

That would be more encouraging.

If Nvidia continues underperforming while other chips rally?

I stay cautious.

Because:

RELATIVE STRENGTH OFTEN TELLS US MORE THAN A SINGLE GREEN CANDLE.

🔮 MY NVIDIA PREDICTION: NOVEMBER 10–13

My subjective probabilities for the remaining trading sessions this week.

🟢 BULL CASE: 30%

The investigation produces no new adverse findings.

The market refocuses on Nvidia's earnings outlook.

Inflation data supports technology valuations.

NVDA reclaims $180, then $186–$190.

Potential recovery:

$190–$200.

I would want the breakout accompanied by sustained buying and improving relative strength.

🟡 BASE CASE: 45%

MY MOST LIKELY SCENARIO.

The business remains strong.

But investors remain cautious about governance uncertainty and the pending earnings release.

Nvidia experiences volatile two-way trading.

Expected working range:

$170–$190.

I think a recovery attempt is plausible.

But a sustainable rally may take longer than one or two sessions.

🔴 BEAR CASE: 25%

New adverse information emerges.

The shareholder lawsuit adds to uncertainty.

Or inflation data triggers another growth-stock selloff.

NVDA loses:

$170.

Potential downside:

$155–$170.

That would force me to reassess the near-term trading setup.

These probabilities are judgement calls, not statistically calculated odds.

📍 MY NVIDIA BUYING MAP

$170–$172: FIRST SUPPORT WATCH

Monday's low is the immediate level I want buyers to defend.

A higher low would be constructive.

$178–$180: FIRST RECOVERY TEST

A sustained reclaim would suggest some selling pressure is easing.

$186–$190: STRONGER CONFIRMATION

This is where I would start becoming more constructive.

Especially if the semiconductor sector remains strong.

$195–$200: BULL-CASE RECOVERY ZONE

Possible, but I would not assume Nvidia can immediately return there without stronger evidence.

BELOW $170: CAUTION

A sustained breakdown increases the risk of $165 and potentially $155–$160.

I would avoid mechanically averaging down if this happens.

📅 THE NEXT TWO CATALYSTS

Tonight, November 10:

US CPI.

Friday, November 13:

US PPI.

And the real company-specific test:

NOVEMBER 17: NVIDIA EARNINGS.

If Nvidia delivers strong results and guidance while the board provides reassuring updates?

Investors may gradually reduce the discount they're applying to the stock.

But a strong earnings beat alone may not resolve governance uncertainty.

And if the earnings outlook disappoints while the investigation remains open?

The risks could compound.

🔥 MY CALL: I THINK NVIDIA IS APPROACHING AN INTERESTING BUYING ZONE, BUT I AM NOT CALLING THE BOTTOM YET

At $178.67, Nvidia is substantially below its late-October trading levels.

And for long-term investors, a correction in a fundamentally strong company deserves attention.

But here's the mistake I want to avoid.

BUYING BECAUSE THE STOCK HAS FALLEN.

Rather than:

BUYING BECAUSE THE RISK/REWARD HAS IMPROVED.

Those are not the same thing.

I remain constructive about Nvidia's AI business.

But its leadership controversy introduces a risk that cannot be resolved through a financial spreadsheet.

I want clarity from the board.

I want evidence that customers and regulators remain confident.

And I want the stock to demonstrate that buyers are returning.

So my preference?

At $170–$175?

WATCH FOR STABILISATION.

Above $180?

FIRST SIGN OF IMPROVEMENT.

Above $186–$190 with strong volume?

I BECOME MORE CONSTRUCTIVE.

Below $170?

I REASSESS THE DOWNSIDE.

For investors already sitting on losses, I understand the temptation to buy aggressively and recover everything in one bounce.

But the market doesn't reward us simply for being patient or loyal to a company.

We still need a plan.

And protecting capital matters just as much as identifying the next opportunity.

My biggest takeaway?

NVIDIA'S AI LEADERSHIP HAS NOT DISAPPEARED.

BUT INVESTOR CONFIDENCE NEEDS TO BE REBUILT.

For now, I think $170 could prove to be an important trading low.

But I need confirmation before calling it THE bottom.

Because a sharp rebound from the lows tells me buyers are interested.

A SUSTAINED BREAKOUT TELLS ME THEY ARE COMMITTED.

And that's the distinction I'm trading.

I am not a financial advisor. Trade wisely, Comrades!

Would you buy Nvidia around $170–$180, or wait until it reclaims $190 and the governance picture becomes clearer?

If you find this post interesting, give it wings! 🪽 Repost and share the insights.

Do consider ‘Follow me’ and get firsthand read of my daily new post. Thank you. 

@Tiger_SG  @TigerEvents  @Daily_Discussion  @TigerStars  @TigerPM