**-To The Moon - Tiger Brokers Online Investing Community

Like
Comment
Favorite

门_7322
2020-08-16

Can't Tesla "refuse to hand over the door", so that consumers can get some benefits?

拼多多补贴特斯拉Model 3的活动，团购价格直降四万，虽然得到了消费者的欢迎，但却遭遇一些波折。特斯拉方认为拼多多的团购构成转卖，拒绝向拼多多“限时秒杀”频道团购车主交付Model 3。而拼多多回应

Can't Tesla "refuse to hand over the door", so that consumers can get some benefits?

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment

Top
Latest

No comments yet

Most Discussed

{"i18n":{"language":"en_US"},"data":{"magic":2,"id":970062409,"tweetId":"970062409","gmtCreate":1597531978201,"gmtModify":1705055294670,"author":{"id":246737441473300,"idStr":"246737441473300","authorId":246737441473300,"authorIdStr":"246737441473300","name":"门_7322","avatar":"https://static.tigerbbs.com/3129ecbf58055ffa98abaa42cf62fbee","vip":1,"userType":1,"introduction":"","boolIsFan":false,"boolIsHead":false,"crmLevel":7,"crmLevelSwitch":0,"individualDisplayBadges":[],"fanSize":5,"starInvestorFlag":false},"themes":[],"images":[],"coverImages":[],"extraTitle":"","html":"<html><head></head><body>**</body></html>","htmlText":"<html><head></head><body>**</body></html>","text":"**","highlighted":1,"essential":1,"paper":1,"likeSize":0,"commentSize":0,"repostSize":0,"favoriteSize":0,"link":"https://ttm.financial/post/970062409","repostId":2059616110,"repostType":2,"repost":{"id":"2059616110","kind":"highlight","pubTimestamp":1597500780,"share":"https://ttm.financial/m/news/2059616110?lang=en_US&edition=fundamental","pubTime":"2020-08-15 22:13","market":"us","language":"zh","title":"Can't Tesla \"refuse to hand over the door\", so that consumers can get some benefits?","url":"https://stock-news.laohu8.com/highlight/detail?id=2059616110","media":"红星新闻","summary":"拼多多补贴特斯拉Model 3的活动，团购价格直降四万，虽然得到了消费者的欢迎，但却遭遇一些波折。特斯拉方认为拼多多的团购构成转卖，拒绝向拼多多“限时秒杀”频道团购车主交付Model 3。而拼多多回应","content":"<html><body><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PDD\">Pinduoduo</a>subsidy<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>For the Model 3 event, the group purchase price dropped by 40,000 yuan. Although it was welcomed by consumers, it encountered some twists and turns. Tesla believes that Pinduoduo's group purchase constitutes resale, and refuses to deliver Model 3 to Pinduoduo's \"limited-time flash sale\" channel group purchase owners. Pinduoduo responded to the Tesla incident: there is no order resale, and he supports consumer rights protection.What is right and what is wrong first look at the lawSo, which is right and which is wrong? On right and wrong, of course, it has to be viewed from the legal point of view.First of all, the car must be the real deal. Pinduoduo won't go and can't imitate Teslas. No one can imitate Tesla. In fact, when Tesla Chinese executives directly said \"Don't be fooled\" on social media, they were essentially accusing Pinduoduo of selling fake cars. This already poses considerable legal risks.Secondly, this is a promotional activity organized by Pinduoduo. This activity involves Tesla, but it is not said to be an activity authorized by Tesla.Third, this activity has not skipped and cannot skip Tesla's direct sales model, and naturally there is no business model that hurts Tesla. In this activity, although Pinduoduo gave subsidies and borne its own losses, the 2017 Anti-Unfair Competition Law has cancelled the clause on \"selling goods at a price below cost\". Selling below cost, the means of attracting users, is the norm in the current market. Obviously, it cannot be said that it is illegal to give consumer welfare. Just like Didi subsidized taxi fares in those days, no one said that it was illegal for Didi to give consumer welfare. No matter from the law itself or consumer feelings, no court will give such a judgment.Fourthly, the essence of this activity is that Pinduoduo subsidizes customers and then places orders on their behalf. It is a purchasing process, not resale. To judge whether a car has been resold, from the procedure, it depends on the name of the vehicle registration certificate and whether there is any change; In essence, it is whether the car is being used by others. Obviously, neither of these situations happened, which is just like the train ticket purchasing business of major platforms, and does not constitute resale. Therefore, although Tesla is trying to point consumers to sue Pinduoduo for selling used cars and deceive consumers, this will not work legally.There is no doubt that when Tesla's interference exceeds the scope of legal protection, all kinds of embarrassing situations will occur. This time, Tesla is directly at odds with consumers. Moreover, all their responses can only use the word \"suspicion\". Obviously, Tesla's refusal to sell model 3 to consumers is unfounded in law, and they also know that it is difficult to get legal support.The law judges right and wrong, and for enterprises, it is also necessary to consider all aspects of gains and losses.Tesla Hurts Consumer FeelingsTesla's behavior has hurt the emotions of consumers. Some consumers said, \"Pinduoduo still needs your consent to give me a subsidy of 20,000 yuan?\" When someone is willing to give consumers some benefits, it is foolish to block them. The goodwill of the brand is ultimately given by consumers.Tesla's Chinese team would rather lose such an important thing. Tesla must be trying to gain something and maintain something.<div sax-type=\"proxy\"></div>Tesla's prices, profits, and rules have not been broken, but it still boycotts this activity. On the surface, it is because it doesn't want its products to be lowered in price. But what if the subsidy is not Pinduoduo, but the state subsidy? In fact, Tesla has always had state subsidies. So, on a deeper level, they may not want to be associated with Pinduoduo.This reminds me of an article that went viral on the Chinese Internet 20 years ago. A highly educated marketing consultant who came out of the countryside attended a product research and development meeting of a tissue factory. At the meeting, it was proposed to develop an after-dinner paper towel for farmers. The marketing consultant strongly opposed it, believing that there was no market. A returnee female executive who supports this product asked, what do they use after dinner? The marketing consultant made a gesture of wiping his mouth with his sleeve, and then, in the article, he noted what happened at that time: She gave me a contemptuous look.This is the collision between elitism and Chinese reality. In the past 20 years, China's economy has experienced explosive development. The inclusive nature brought by the Internet, the development of technology, and smart minds have created a platform like Pinduoduo, which has brought about consumption upgrades all over China's vast territory, so that more people can use kitchen paper and napkins at a cheap price. However, this populist inclusive consumption is still despised by the so-called elitism of the upper class.Rejecting Pinduoduo, perhaps Tesla's Chinese team feels that they should keep a distance from Pinduoduo and reject populism-you must keep a distance from the platform that sells kitchen paper to people in small towns.Don't look at things from an elite perspectiveHowever, this view is wrong.First of all, Tesla Model 3 is not a high-end model, but a popular model. Its advantage is cost performance.Secondly, as business elites, they are also wrong about Pinduoduo. Pinduoduo is no longer the platform they thought it was. Driven by activities such as tens of billions of subsidies, its active buyer ARPU (average revenue per user) increased by 92% year-on-year, showing the rapid high-end trend of platform users. It is a powerful example to gather so many Tesla users this time.More importantly, Tesla China has lost Tesla's true temperament. In fact, Tesla's temperament has never been elitist. Musk, the founder of Tesla, is of course a high-end business person, but his temperament is geek. He ate pancakes, danced at ribbon-cutting ceremonies, dressed simply, but did one thing to the extreme. Whether it is a Tesla car, a Falcon Heavy rocket, or a Starlink, it has achieved the ultimate and reduced costs under the existing technical conditions.From this perspective, Pinduoduo is also in the commercial field, using existing technologies to achieve the ultimate and reduce costs to the extreme. The fields of companies are different, but the temperament of doing things to the extreme is similar. Don't have to, for fear of getting touched. Besides, people have done things in a down-to-earth manner to make consumers get benefits.Brand positioning can be high-end, but it can't lose its inner enterprise spirit, and its attitude can't be lofty and make behaviors that hurt consumer feelings. On a popular model, the salesperson posed<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RR..UK\">Rolls-Royce</a>The face, not only loses right and wrong, but also confuses the gains and losses. Why bother?<div><img src=\"http://n.sinaimg.cn/default/2fb77759/20151125/320X320.png\"/></div></body></html>","source":"sina_tech","collect":0,"html":"<!DOCTYPE html>\n<html>\n<head>\n<meta http-equiv=\"Content-Type\" content=\"text/html; charset=utf-8\" />\n<meta name=\"viewport\" content=\"width=device-width,initial-scale=1.0,minimum-scale=1.0,maximum-scale=1.0,user-scalable=no\"/>\n<meta name=\"format-detection\" content=\"telephone=no,email=no,address=no\" />\n<title>Can't Tesla \"refuse to hand over the door\", so that consumers can get some benefits?</title>\n<style type=\"text/css\">\na,abbr,acronym,address,applet,article,aside,audio,b,big,blockquote,body,canvas,caption,center,cite,code,dd,del,details,dfn,div,dl,dt,\nem,embed,fieldset,figcaption,figure,footer,form,h1,h2,h3,h4,h5,h6,header,hgroup,html,i,iframe,img,ins,kbd,label,legend,li,mark,menu,nav,\nobject,ol,output,p,pre,q,ruby,s,samp,section,small,span,strike,strong,sub,summary,sup,table,tbody,td,tfoot,th,thead,time,tr,tt,u,ul,var,video{ font:inherit;margin:0;padding:0;vertical-align:baseline;border:0 }\nbody{ font-size:16px; line-height:1.5; color:#999; background:transparent; }\n.wrapper{ overflow:hidden;word-break:break-all;padding:10px; }\nh1,h2{ font-weight:normal; line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:.6em; }\nh3,h4,h5,h6{ line-height:1.35; margin-bottom:1em; }\nh1{ font-size:24px; }\nh2{ font-size:20px; }\nh3{ font-size:18px; }\nh4{ font-size:16px; }\nh5{ font-size:14px; }\nh6{ font-size:12px; }\np,ul,ol,blockquote,dl,table{ margin:1.2em 0; }\nul,ol{ margin-left:2em; }\nul{ list-style:disc; }\nol{ list-style:decimal; }\nli,li p{ margin:10px 0;}\nimg{ max-width:100%;display:block;margin:0 auto 1em; }\nblockquote{ color:#B5B2B1; border-left:3px solid #aaa; padding:1em; }\nstrong,b{font-weight:bold;}\nem,i{font-style:italic;}\ntable{ width:100%;border-collapse:collapse;border-spacing:1px;margin:1em 0;font-size:.9em; }\nth,td{ padding:5px;text-align:left;border:1px solid #aaa; }\nth{ font-weight:bold;background:#5d5d5d; }\n.symbol-link{font-weight:bold;}\n/* header{ border-bottom:1px solid #494756; } */\n.title{ margin:0 0 8px;line-height:1.3;color:#ddd; }\n.meta {color:#5e5c6d;font-size:13px;margin:0 0 .5em; }\na{text-decoration:none; color:#2a4b87;}\n.meta .head { display: inline-block; overflow: hidden}\n.head .h-thumb { width: 30px; height: 30px; margin: 0; padding: 0; border-radius: 50%; float: left;}\n.head .h-content { margin: 0; padding: 0 0 0 9px; float: left;}\n.head .h-name {font-size: 13px; color: #eee; margin: 0;}\n.head .h-time {font-size: 12.5px; color: #7E829C; margin: 0;}\n.small {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.9); -webkit-transform: scale(0.9); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.smaller {font-size: 12.5px; display: inline-block; transform: scale(0.8); -webkit-transform: scale(0.8); transform-origin: left; -webkit-transform-origin: left;}\n.bt-text {font-size: 12px;margin: 1.5em 0 0 0}\n.bt-text p {margin: 0}\n</style>\n</head>\n<body>\n<div class=\"wrapper\">\n<header>\n<h2 class=\"title\">\nCan't Tesla \"refuse to hand over the door\", so that consumers can get some benefits?\n</h2>\n<h4 class=\"meta\">\n\n红星新闻2020-08-15 22:13\n\n</h4>\n</header>\n<article>\n<html><body><a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/PDD\">Pinduoduo</a>subsidy<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/TSLA\">Tesla</a>For the Model 3 event, the group purchase price dropped by 40,000 yuan. Although it was welcomed by consumers, it encountered some twists and turns. Tesla believes that Pinduoduo's group purchase constitutes resale, and refuses to deliver Model 3 to Pinduoduo's \"limited-time flash sale\" channel group purchase owners. Pinduoduo responded to the Tesla incident: there is no order resale, and he supports consumer rights protection.What is right and what is wrong first look at the lawSo, which is right and which is wrong? On right and wrong, of course, it has to be viewed from the legal point of view.First of all, the car must be the real deal. Pinduoduo won't go and can't imitate Teslas. No one can imitate Tesla. In fact, when Tesla Chinese executives directly said \"Don't be fooled\" on social media, they were essentially accusing Pinduoduo of selling fake cars. This already poses considerable legal risks.Secondly, this is a promotional activity organized by Pinduoduo. This activity involves Tesla, but it is not said to be an activity authorized by Tesla.Third, this activity has not skipped and cannot skip Tesla's direct sales model, and naturally there is no business model that hurts Tesla. In this activity, although Pinduoduo gave subsidies and borne its own losses, the 2017 Anti-Unfair Competition Law has cancelled the clause on \"selling goods at a price below cost\". Selling below cost, the means of attracting users, is the norm in the current market. Obviously, it cannot be said that it is illegal to give consumer welfare. Just like Didi subsidized taxi fares in those days, no one said that it was illegal for Didi to give consumer welfare. No matter from the law itself or consumer feelings, no court will give such a judgment.Fourthly, the essence of this activity is that Pinduoduo subsidizes customers and then places orders on their behalf. It is a purchasing process, not resale. To judge whether a car has been resold, from the procedure, it depends on the name of the vehicle registration certificate and whether there is any change; In essence, it is whether the car is being used by others. Obviously, neither of these situations happened, which is just like the train ticket purchasing business of major platforms, and does not constitute resale. Therefore, although Tesla is trying to point consumers to sue Pinduoduo for selling used cars and deceive consumers, this will not work legally.There is no doubt that when Tesla's interference exceeds the scope of legal protection, all kinds of embarrassing situations will occur. This time, Tesla is directly at odds with consumers. Moreover, all their responses can only use the word \"suspicion\". Obviously, Tesla's refusal to sell model 3 to consumers is unfounded in law, and they also know that it is difficult to get legal support.The law judges right and wrong, and for enterprises, it is also necessary to consider all aspects of gains and losses.Tesla Hurts Consumer FeelingsTesla's behavior has hurt the emotions of consumers. Some consumers said, \"Pinduoduo still needs your consent to give me a subsidy of 20,000 yuan?\" When someone is willing to give consumers some benefits, it is foolish to block them. The goodwill of the brand is ultimately given by consumers.Tesla's Chinese team would rather lose such an important thing. Tesla must be trying to gain something and maintain something.<div sax-type=\"proxy\"></div>Tesla's prices, profits, and rules have not been broken, but it still boycotts this activity. On the surface, it is because it doesn't want its products to be lowered in price. But what if the subsidy is not Pinduoduo, but the state subsidy? In fact, Tesla has always had state subsidies. So, on a deeper level, they may not want to be associated with Pinduoduo.This reminds me of an article that went viral on the Chinese Internet 20 years ago. A highly educated marketing consultant who came out of the countryside attended a product research and development meeting of a tissue factory. At the meeting, it was proposed to develop an after-dinner paper towel for farmers. The marketing consultant strongly opposed it, believing that there was no market. A returnee female executive who supports this product asked, what do they use after dinner? The marketing consultant made a gesture of wiping his mouth with his sleeve, and then, in the article, he noted what happened at that time: She gave me a contemptuous look.This is the collision between elitism and Chinese reality. In the past 20 years, China's economy has experienced explosive development. The inclusive nature brought by the Internet, the development of technology, and smart minds have created a platform like Pinduoduo, which has brought about consumption upgrades all over China's vast territory, so that more people can use kitchen paper and napkins at a cheap price. However, this populist inclusive consumption is still despised by the so-called elitism of the upper class.Rejecting Pinduoduo, perhaps Tesla's Chinese team feels that they should keep a distance from Pinduoduo and reject populism-you must keep a distance from the platform that sells kitchen paper to people in small towns.Don't look at things from an elite perspectiveHowever, this view is wrong.First of all, Tesla Model 3 is not a high-end model, but a popular model. Its advantage is cost performance.Secondly, as business elites, they are also wrong about Pinduoduo. Pinduoduo is no longer the platform they thought it was. Driven by activities such as tens of billions of subsidies, its active buyer ARPU (average revenue per user) increased by 92% year-on-year, showing the rapid high-end trend of platform users. It is a powerful example to gather so many Tesla users this time.More importantly, Tesla China has lost Tesla's true temperament. In fact, Tesla's temperament has never been elitist. Musk, the founder of Tesla, is of course a high-end business person, but his temperament is geek. He ate pancakes, danced at ribbon-cutting ceremonies, dressed simply, but did one thing to the extreme. Whether it is a Tesla car, a Falcon Heavy rocket, or a Starlink, it has achieved the ultimate and reduced costs under the existing technical conditions.From this perspective, Pinduoduo is also in the commercial field, using existing technologies to achieve the ultimate and reduce costs to the extreme. The fields of companies are different, but the temperament of doing things to the extreme is similar. Don't have to, for fear of getting touched. Besides, people have done things in a down-to-earth manner to make consumers get benefits.Brand positioning can be high-end, but it can't lose its inner enterprise spirit, and its attitude can't be lofty and make behaviors that hurt consumer feelings. On a popular model, the salesperson posed<a href=\"https://laohu8.com/S/RR..UK\">Rolls-Royce</a>The face, not only loses right and wrong, but also confuses the gains and losses. Why bother?<div><img src=\"http://n.sinaimg.cn/default/2fb77759/20151125/320X320.png\"/></div></body></html>\n<div class=\"bt-text\">\n\n\n source：<a href=\"https://tech.sina.cn/it/2020-08-15/detail-iivhuipn8866932.d.html?vt=4\">红星新闻</a>\n\n\n</div>\n</article>\n</div>\n</body>\n</html>\n","type":0,"thumbnail":"https://k.sinaimg.cn/n/tech/transform/667/w400h267/20200204/78d4-inzcrxs3991040.jpg/w120h90l50t1fda.jpg","relate_stocks":{"TSLA":"特斯拉"},"source_url":"https://tech.sina.cn/it/2020-08-15/detail-iivhuipn8866932.d.html?vt=4","is_english":false,"share_image_url":"https://static.laohu8.com/e9f99090a1c2ed51c021029395664489","article_id":"2059616110","content_text":"拼多多补贴特斯拉Model 3的活动，团购价格直降四万，虽然得到了消费者的欢迎，但却遭遇一些波折。特斯拉方认为拼多多的团购构成转卖，拒绝向拼多多“限时秒杀”频道团购车主交付Model 3。而拼多多回应特斯拉事件：不存在订单转卖，支持消费者维权。\n孰是孰非先看法律\n那么，孰是孰非呢？论是非，那当然就得从法律角度来看。\n首先，车肯定是真货。拼多多不会去也无法去仿造特斯拉。没人能够仿造特斯拉。实际上，当特斯拉中国的高层直接在社交媒体上说“大家别上当”，实质就是在指控拼多多卖假车。这已经构成相当的法律风险。\n其次，这是拼多多搞的一个促销活动，这个活动中涉及到特斯拉，但并没有说是特斯拉授权的活动。\n第三，这个活动并没有跳过、也无法跳过特斯拉的直销模式，自然也谈不到伤害特斯拉的商业模式。拼多多在这个活动中，虽然给了补贴，自行承担了亏损的，但2017年《反不正当竞争法》已经取消了关于“以低于成本的价格销售商品”的条款，低于成本销售，吸引用户的手段，是现在市场的常态。显然，不能说给到消费者福利是违法的。就像当年滴滴补贴出租车费，没人说滴滴给了消费者福利是违法的。不管从法律本身，还是消费者感情来说，没有法院会给出这样的判断。\n第四，这次活动的本质，是拼多多补贴客户，然后代客户去下订单，是一个代购过程，并不是转卖。判断一辆车是否被转卖，从程序上，是看车辆登记证的名字，有无变更；从实质上看，是这辆车是否被他人使用。显然这两种情况都没有发生，这就像各大平台的火车票代购业务一样，并不构成转卖。所以，虽然特斯拉试图把消费者指向去告拼多多卖二手车，欺骗消费者，但这在法律上是行不通的。\n毫无疑问，当特斯拉的干涉超过法律保护之外的范围时，就会发生各种尴尬的情况，这次，特斯拉算是直接和消费者怼上了。而且，他们的所有回应仅仅能用“怀疑”二字。显然，特斯拉拒绝向消费者出售model3于法无据，他们也知道，难以得到法律的支持。\n法律判断是非，而对企业来说，还要考虑各方面的得失。\n特斯拉伤害了消费者感情\n特斯拉的行为，伤害了消费者的情感。有消费者说：“拼多多给我补贴2万还需要你同意？” 当有人愿意给消费者一些好处，去阻挡是愚蠢的，品牌的好感度，终究是消费者给的。\n特斯拉的中国团队，宁愿失去这么重要的东西，特斯拉一定是为了得到什么，维护什么。\n特斯拉的的价格、利润、规则都并未被破坏，但仍然抵制这个活动，表面上看，是因为不想自己的产品被压低价格。但如果给补贴的不是拼多多，是国家补贴呢？实际上，特斯拉一直有国家补贴。所以，更深层次的，他们或许是不想与拼多多发生关联。\n这让我想起一个20年前在中国互联网上热传的文章。一位从乡村走出来的高学历营销顾问，参加一个纸巾厂的产品研发会议。会议上，提出为农民研发一款餐后纸巾，这位营销顾问强烈反对，认为没有市场。一位支持这款产品的海归女高管问，那他们饭后用什么呢？这位营销顾问做了一个用袖子擦嘴的动作，然后，他在文章中记下了当时发生的事：她轻蔑地看了我一眼。\n这就是精英主义与中国现实的碰撞。20年时间过去，中国经济经历了爆发式的发展，互联网带来的普惠性质，技术的发展，加之聪明的头脑，创生出拼多多这样的平台，其带来的消费升级遍及中国广袤的国土，让更多的人可以以便宜的价格，用上厨房用纸，用上餐巾纸。然而，这种平民主义的普惠消费，却仍然被所谓的上流社会的精英主义所鄙视。\n拒绝拼多多，或许是特斯拉的中国团队觉得，应该与拼多多保持距离，拒绝平民主义——你必须和卖给小城人厨房用纸的平台保持距离。\n别用精英视角看问题\n但是，这种看法是错误的。\n首先，特斯拉Model3，并不是高端车型，而是普及性车型，其优势，正是性价比。\n其次，作为商业精英，他们对拼多多的看法也是错误的。拼多多已经不再是他们想象中的那样一个平台。在百亿补贴等活动的带动下，其活跃买家ARPU（每用户平均收入）同比增长92%，显示出平台用户的迅速高端化趋势。此次能会聚这么多特斯拉用户，正是一个有力的例子。\n更重要得是，特斯拉中国丢失了特斯拉的真正气质。实际上，特斯拉的气质，从来不是精英主义。特斯拉的创始人马斯克，当然是高端商务人士，但其气质却是极客。他吃煎饼，在剪彩仪式上跳舞、穿着简单，但却把一件事做到极致。不管是特斯拉车，还是猎鹰重型火箭、还是星链，都是在现有的技术条件下，做到了极致，降低成本。\n从这个角度看，拼多多也是在商业领域，用现有技术做到极致，把成本降低到极致。公司领域不同，但把事情做到极致的气质却是相近的。大可不必，生怕沾上了的模样。况且，人家扎扎实实做了让消费者拿到实惠的事情。\n品牌定位可以高端，但却不能迷失了内在的企业精神，态度更不能高高在上，做出伤害消费感情的行为。在一辆普及性的车型上，销售人员摆出一副劳斯莱斯的面孔，不但输了是非，也会乱了得失，这又是何苦呢？","news_type":1,"symbols_score_info":{"TSLA":1}},"isVote":1,"tweetType":1,"viewCount":1647,"commentLimit":10,"likeStatus":false,"favoriteStatus":false,"reportStatus":false,"symbols":[],"verified":2,"subType":0,"readableState":1,"langContent":"EN","currentLanguage":"EN","warmUpFlag":false,"orderFlag":false,"shareable":true,"causeOfNotShareable":"","featuresForAnalytics":[],"commentAndTweetFlag":false,"andRepostAutoSelectedFlag":false,"upFlag":false,"length":2,"xxTargetLangEnum":"ORIG"},"commentList":[],"hasMoreComment":false,"orderType":2}