To The Moon

As a Tiger $Tiger Brokers(TIGR)$ community member, I’d say I’m more aggressive overall, but not purely WSB-style risk-taking. I’m willing to accept volatility when there’s a clear long-term thesis, especially in AI-driven names, while still keeping risk management in mind to avoid large drawdowns. My overlap with the lists is mainly $Palantir Technologies Inc.(PLTR)$ , $Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ and $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ which sit in both WSB and Tiger users’

Micron's $Micron Technology(MU)$  rally doesn't surprise me, especially given how selectively the market is rewarding names with real AI-linked pricing power. A 3% move against a weak broader tape tells me flows are rotating toward parts of the AI value chain that are still under-owned. Memory has lagged compute for a long time, so when expectations start to shift, the re-rating can happen faster than people expect. I don't think it's "too late," but I also don't see this as a chase. If Nomura is right about the memory supercycle extending into 2027, then this is more about staying power than perfect entry timing. The key point for me is supply discipline: with no meaningful capacity additions before 2028, even mo

From my perspective, a "disappointing" Q4 delivery print is already largely in the market's line of sight. With consensus clustered around ~420k vehicles and expectations for a second consecutive year of lower deliveries, this is not a shock scenario. Tesla itself guiding investors to these numbers suggests the bar has been clearly set—and when expectations are well-anchored, the downside impact of a mild miss is often more muted than headlines imply. What matters more to me is why deliveries are weak and whether that weakness is cyclical or structural. In this case, I see it as largely transitional: product refresh gaps, pricing normalization after aggressive cuts, and buyers waiting for next-gen models. These are real issues, but they're not the same as demand permanently breaking. Tesla

My focus today will be on silver $FUT:Silver - main 2603(SImain)$ , especially after this sharp pullback. The recent move feels more like a liquidity-driven shakeout than a breakdown in fundamentals, but that doesn’t mean prices can’t stay volatile in the near term. After such a crowded trade unwinds, the market needs time to rebuild confidence & depth. At this stage, I’m firmly in the “steady first, act later” camp. The long-term logic for precious metals remains intact, yet short-term liquidity is clearly thin and sentiment fragile. I’d rather anchor my portfolio with gold ETFs as a core holding, while watching silver patiently for signs that

I see the recent pullback in the S&P 500 $S&P 500(.SPX)$   less as a reason to panic and more as a stress test for a very crowded bullish consensus. When every major strategist is on the same side of the boat, I become cautious—not because the trend is broken, but because expectations are already high. A market that has delivered three strong years in a row doesn't need bad news to correct; it only needs reality to come in slightly below perfection. That said, I don't view this pullback as an outright warning signal either. The macro backdrop going into 2026 still looks constructive: easing financial conditions, resilient corporate earnings, and productivity gains driven by AI investment. The fact t

Bitcoin $CME Bitcoin - main 2601(BTCmain)$   reclaiming the $90,000 level feels more like a test of conviction than a clean victory lap. When price approaches a major psychological level like this, I'm less focused on the headline and more on how the market behaves around it. The strength in crypto-related equities alongside Bitcoin suggests risk appetite is still there, but historically, these levels often come with hesitation rather than immediate follow-through. Between direct Bitcoin exposure and crypto-related equities, I still prefer holding Bitcoin itself when prices are near key levels. Bitcoin gives me cleaner exposure without company-specific risks like balance sheets, dilution, or operational issues. Crypto equities

Silver's sharp pullback after making new highs doesn't surprise me. When an asset rallies aggressively and breaks psychological levels like $80, profit-taking is almost inevitable. A 5% correction after such a vertical move feels more like a reset of positioning than a breakdown of the trend. For me, this kind of volatility is part of a mature bull market, not a signal that the story is suddenly over. On whether I would take profits, my answer is selective rather than all-or-nothing. I'm comfortable trimming positions that have run far ahead of my original allocation or where leverage is involved, but I wouldn't rush to fully exit core holdings. Precious metals, especially silver, tend to overshoot in both directions, and selling everything into the first sharp pullback often means missing

Buffett stepping down is undoubtedly the end of an era, but it doesn't automatically weaken my confidence in Berkshire Hathaway as a defensive stock. What Buffett built over six decades is not just a portfolio of businesses, but a deeply embedded culture of capital discipline, long-term thinking, and risk control. In my view, that culture matters far more than any single individual, even someone as legendary as Buffett. I do have confidence in his successor, largely because this transition has been planned for years, not rushed at the last minute. The operating businesses are already run independently by strong managers, and capital allocation has long been a shared process with clear principles. Berkshire today is less about stock picking genius and more about a system that prioritizes ca

My top pick this week is $Taiwan Fund Inc(TWN)$ . With its upcoming ex-dividend date, it’s a great way to secure a solid payout while staying exposed to Taiwan’s key sectors. As a fund, it provides diversification and reduces single-stock risk, which I value for stability and growth. TWN has posted positive YTD gains, unlike some other high-dividend stocks, reflecting strong fundamentals and a disciplined dividend track record. Buying before the ex-dividend date lets me capture the payout while still benefiting from potential long-term upside in Taiwan’s tech and industrial sectors. I’ve also checked the analyst price targets on Tiger Trade, and the outlook looks

I found Mr. Liu’s investing journey really inspiring. What stands out is how he combines discipline with a structured framework rather than chasing tips or reacting to market noise. His focus on supply, demand, and scarcity makes a lot of sense, especially in handling volatility without panic. I also appreciate how candid he is about both his successes and regrets, like with Tesla and Nvidia. It’s a good reminder that even getting the direction right doesn’t guarantee profits—position sizing and holding discipline are just as important. Overall, his approach highlights that long-term investing is more about building a repeatable system than short-term speculation. It’s motivating to see someone turn careful analysis and consistent logic into tangible results.