To The Moon

Do warrants with higher trading volume have better liquidity? • There’s a common misconception among investors that only structured warrants with high trading volumes are liquid • Although higher trading volumes for shares and other listed securities generally mean that such securities are more liquid, this does not always apply for warrants due to the existence of a market maker • A warrant with low trading volume can have high liquidity and vice versa • Read on to find out more here: https://tinyurl.com/ynjn5knr

Newly listed warrants tracking Nio Singapore, Keppel and Yangzijiang! See how the warrants move alongside their respective underlyings on the Live matrix tool! $NIO Inc.(NIO)$ Call HXQW: https://warrants.com.sg/tools/livematrix/HXQW $Keppel(BN4.SI)$ Call 94BW: https://warrants.com.sg/tools/livematrix/94BW $Yangzijiang Shipbuilding Holdings, Ltd.(YGSHY)$ Call V3DW: https://warrants.com.sg/tools/livematrix/V3DW Nio: Nio has undergone massive volatility in the month of June, with a13.4% rally on 2 Jun, before the addition of Nio to the US Defense Department’s "Chinese Military Companies” (CMC) list announced on 9 Jun wiped out all of this rally last week. Y

Rate decisions in Japan, US this week, plus key Chinese activity data due tomorrow - All eyes will be on this week's rate decisions, starting with the Bank of Japan (BOJ) tomorrow morning - Tues: the BOJ is expected to hike policy rate by 25 basis points to 1.00%. Comments from Governor Ueda at the late April meeting and in early June indicated that the Policy Board intended to continue its policy normalisation process in the near term, to “avoid falling behind the curve … unless there is a major downturn in the economy” and as long as prices rise “as expected or if upside risks materialize". - Another factor that may support the BOJ decision to hike is recent comments from PM Takaichi that the BOJ is able to decide monetary policy settings independently, which represents a shift awa

📉Yesterday, $Seatrium Ltd(5E2.SI)$ shares closed at $1.96, its lowest level since 6 May 2025, adding to its 22% share price loss since April 2026 Seatrium has sharply underperformed, falling 6% over the past year compared to the 33% gain in the benchmark index and 56% surge in peer Keppel According to Bloomberg AskB, Seatrium's price action over the past year has been driven almost entirely by P/E de-rating, not Seatrium's earnings deterioration Seatrium's current 13x forward P/E represents a meaningful discount to Keppel and reflects the market's scepticism on near-term order momentum (Bloomberg) 📢Seatrium provided a first quarter business update two weeks ago on 29 May, reporting a net order book of S$15.5 billion across 24 projects, with deli

🔻 $BABA-W(09988)$ shares declined as much as 6.1% to HKD 106.10 today, and is currently trading 5.74% lower to HKD 107 as of 3PM It is the second worst performing stock on the Hang Seng Index today The stock is hit by a series of headlines: 1)Regulatory summons of various e-commerce platforms from Alibab to JD.com to Douyin and Xiaohongshu over misleading "618" promotions (MT Newswire) 2) Cloud and AI competitiveness concerns: according to Bloomberg, investors are questioning Alibaba's ability to benefit from China's data-center buildout, with concerns specifically around Huawei's competitive position in government-backed projects. This is on top of worries regarding pricing pressure on AI tokens which could erode Alibaba's margins 3) Possible un

SGX has delivered a standout outperformance over the past year, driven by Singapore's broad market reform agenda, share price volatility, and growing IPO interest $SGX(S68.SI)$’s share price is up 64% on a total return basis over the past year, far outperforming the benchmark index’s 32% return It has also outperformed the Singapore banks across the 1-month, 3-month, 6-month and 12-month time horizons (Bloomberg AskB) Macquarie’s trending SGX call warrant $SGX MB eCW260929(NFUW.SI)$ (https://warrants.com.sg/tools/HistoricalPerformance/NFUW) which was listed on 1 April 2026, is up 37.1% to SGD 0.085 since, compared to SGX’s 10.8% gain over the same period There is no trending put warrant tracking SGX

👀See how the warrants move alongside the HSI futures and Tencent share, respectively! ✳HSI call $HSI 28000MBeCW260828(UNMW.SI)$ : https://warrants.com.sg/tools/livematrix/UNMW ✴HSI put $HSI 23000MBePW260828(WZ6W.SI)$ : https://warrants.com.sg/tools/livematrix/WZ6W ✳Tencent call $TencentMBeCW270105(WUHW.SI)$ : https://warrants.com.sg/tools/livematrix/WUHW

See how the warrants move alongside the shares on the Live Matrix! Bilibili call $Bilibili MB eCW261005(JZAW.SI)$ : https://warrants.com.sg/tools/livematrix/JZAW Ping An call $PingAn MB eCW270105(VJEW.SI)$ : https://warrants.com.sg/tools/livematrix/VJEW UOB put: $UOB MB ePW261230(VKGW.SI)$ : https://warrants.com.sg/tools/livematrix/VKGW

Read Dan's article published on 9 June 2026 for full disclaimers: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/china-tech-back-conversation-dan-chang-c-s-%E5%BC%A0%E7%88%B5%E5%85%B4--u1rxc?utm_source=share&utm_medium=member_ios&utm_campaign=share_via The Market Moved On. Did China Tech? Markets have a habit of making yesterday's favourites look forgotten, until they aren't. Some years ago, before the clampdown by China authorities in 2021, almost every conversation seemed to revolve around China technology stocks. Alibaba, Tencent and Xiaomi were just some of the names that investors couldn't get enough of. Then the narrative changed. Regulatory concerns, slowing economic growth, property market challenges and geopolitical tensions gradually dampened sentiment towards China equities. At the same

$NKY 62000MBeCW260911(V5PW.SI)$ $NKY 55000MBePW260911(YHSW.SI)$