To The Moon

$Circle Internet Corp.(CRCL)$ The downgrade of Circle by Compass Point Research from “Neutral” to “Sell” is rooted in a logical and data-driven concern: interest rate sensitivity. While not universally conclusive, the rationale does carry weight—especially when one examines the business model of Circle and similar fintech/crypto-related firms.

---

Do I agree with Compass Point Research’s downgrade of Circle?

Yes, to an extent.

The downgrade appears justifiable if your investment thesis for Circle is tied significantly to its interest income model, which has been elevated by higher U.S. Treasury yields. Circle, the issuer of the USDC stablecoin, earns yield from the reserves backing USDC, much of which is held in short-term government securities or interest-bearing accounts.

If the Federal Reserve cuts rates, Circle’s yield on reserves would decline, compressing a meaningful revenue stream—especially given that its USDC circulation has not meaningfully rebounded to its 2022 peak.

Additional concerns include:

Stiffening competition in the stablecoin and on-chain finance space (e.g. PayPal’s PYUSD, or even non-U.S. stablecoin alternatives).

Regulatory overhang, particularly as the U.S. edges closer to stablecoin legislation, which could impose constraints on issuance, reserve management, or cross-border transfers.

That said, a "Sell" rating assumes significant downside ahead. If one believes that Circle's IPO is imminent or that adoption of USDC in institutional or remittance contexts will grow, that rating could be overly pessimistic. But in the near term, especially with potential rate cuts, downside risk is real.

---

How might a potential Fed rate cut impact other fintech or crypto-related companies?

A Fed rate cut introduces both tailwinds and headwinds, depending on a firm's business model:

---

📉 Negative Impact: Interest-Rate Sensitive Models

1. Fintechs with High Interest Income (e.g. PayPal, Robinhood, SoFi):

These companies often park customer balances in interest-bearing accounts or generate float income.

Lower rates reduce net interest income, compressing margins—especially if lending products (e.g. SoFi’s personal loans) also face declining net interest margins.

2. Stablecoin Issuers (e.g. Circle, Paxos):

As described, lower yields reduce income earned on reserves backing their tokens.

Unless user volume grows substantially, profitability could decline.

---

📈 Positive or Neutral Impact: Volume and Risk-On Exposure

1. Crypto Exchanges (e.g. Coinbase, Binance):

Lower interest rates can spark a risk-on environment, encouraging more speculative trading activity.

If crypto prices rally, exchange volumes (and revenue) may increase despite lower rates.

2. Blockchain Infrastructure Firms (e.g. ConsenSys, Chainlink):

These are less exposed to monetary policy directly.

However, a more supportive macro backdrop (via rate cuts) could lead to more capital inflows into crypto ecosystems, benefiting adoption and token valuations.

3. Buy Now, Pay Later (BNPL) Firms (e.g. Affirm, Afterpay):

Rate cuts can help reduce cost of capital and funding expenses for BNPL products.

However, credit risk remains a concern in a weakening consumer environment.

---

Final Thoughts

The downgrade of Circle aligns with prudent caution in the face of declining rate-driven revenue, stagnant USDC growth, and an uncertain regulatory backdrop. However, if Circle can pivot toward increased transaction volume, international partnerships, or blockchain-native financial services (beyond just reserve yield), there may still be long-term upside.

In the broader fintech and crypto landscape, a Fed pivot toward rate cuts will sort companies into winners and losers depending on their reliance on interest income versus their ability to thrive in risk-on environments.