Great article, would you like to share it?

@Barcode
$Rocket Lab USA, Inc.(RKLB)$ $Eos Energy Enterprises Inc.(EOSE)$ 💡📊🔥 How I Enter “Too Strong” Stocks: Pattern Memory, Gamma Triggers, and Space Force Tailwinds in $RKLB and $EOSE 🔥📊💡 I’m extremely confident this isn’t just a high-conviction chart setup. It’s a convergence of historical breakout geometry, institutional options flow, earnings volatility, and national defense tailwinds. I’m not guessing; I’m executing a thesis with multi-layered probability and real-world catalysts. 📊 $RKLB: From chart symmetry to Pentagon strategy Rocket Lab ($RKLB) reports Q2 earnings on 08Aug25 after market close. Forecasts show: • EPS: –$0.11 vs –$0.08 YoY • Revenue: $135.4M • EBIT: –$51.25M • Gross margin trend: 25.56% • Net margin: –39.18% • Analysts: 4 recommend, 7 buy, 5 hold • Price fluctuation Q2: +97.87% • Mean PT: $37.04, High PT: $51.00 Despite losses, investor positioning says otherwise. On 15Aug options expiry: • $45C: 1.10K contracts, premium $3.65, delta 0.536, gamma 0.042 • $50C: 942 contracts, premium $1.93, open interest 8.40K • Bulk buy order (15Aug $50C): 2,000 contracts, turnover $4.54M • $55C: 2,000 contracts, $2.86M turnover • Support: $28.53, Resistance: $48.63, Spot: $44.81 Gamma and vanna both steepen into the $50 to $55 cluster, showing convexity buildup. The 4H Bollinger/Keltner setup confirms: price recently tagged $56, retraced to $44, and is hugging the 55 EMA. No panic, just breathing before the next vertical. 🚀 But here’s the rocket fuel: Rocket Lab’s 2025 revenue forecast is $576M versus SpaceX’s $15.5B. Yet its $23B market cap gives it a P/S ratio of 40 compared to SpaceX’s 26. That compresses fast; by 2026, its P/S drops to 23 on projected $904M revenue. This isn’t overvalued, it’s front-loaded for expansion. 📡 Golden Dome and Victus Haze: This is not retail hype Space Force Gen. Michael Guetlein, appointed by Trump to lead Golden Dome missile defense, has already awarded $RKLB the Victus Haze contract, designed to test 24-hour responsive satellite launch and in-orbit interception. That mission launches this year. CNN reports that Guetlein, who has unique autonomy in awarding contracts, is focused on scaling space-based interceptors. He explicitly said the technical challenge isn’t the physics; it’s the industrial base. Guess who Space Command just visited? Rocket Lab. Guess who’s on Rocket Lab’s board? A retired Space Force Lt. General. This isn’t a matter of if. They’re already on the list. 📈 Projecting ahead: Neutron, Rocket Lab’s heavy-lift launch system, is projected to surpass Falcon 9’s pace. By 2035: • Over 150 cumulative launches • Just 25 first stages reused • Two launches per month pace This growth isn’t theoretical; it’s engineered. The pattern structure on the weekly chart mirrors this: a two-year base, parabolic climb, and projected continuation to $85 with wedge geometry confirming strength. 📊 $EOSE: Harmonic symmetry and structural setup strength $EOSE continues to print a near-flawless harmonic bowl breakout. The current price ($5.42) sits in a structurally sound pullback zone after touching $6.60. On the 4H chart, price is coiled between mid-Bollinger and Keltner base layers with fading volume and trend EMAs holding. This is a textbook volume-pocket reset before liftoff. The multi-year harmonic structure projects toward $46.44, and the current consolidation phase suggests trend integrity is being preserved, not broken. Analysts may not see it yet. The chart does. 🎯 Trade plan • I’m already long $RKLB with conviction. My preferred accumulation zone remains $44 to $46, breakout trigger $51, and upside target $85 • $EOSE: Buy zone $5.10 to $5.50, trigger $6.65, target $46.44 • Watch for MACD crossover, EMA hold, and volume burst above Bollinger mid-line 🧠 This is why pattern memory matters I’m systematically cataloguing historically validated breakouts that combine geometry, options mechanics, and thematic catalysts. These are the setups where risk is defined but reward is exponential. So when people ask me: How do you enter a stock that’s already gone vertical? You enter when structure compresses, vanna steepens, and contract flow reveals intent, not when the green candle confirms your fear of missing out. Which launchpad are you positioned on: $RKLB, $EOSE, or both? 📢 Don’t miss out! Like, Repost and Follow me for exclusive setups, cutting-edge trends, and insights that move markets 🚀📈 I’m obsessed with hunting down the next big movers and sharing strategies that crush it. Let’s outsmart the market and stack those gains together! 🍀 Trade like a boss! Happy trading ahead, Cheers, BC 📈🚀🍀🍀🍀 @Tiger_comments @TigerStars @Tiger_Earnings @TigerObserver @TigerWire @Tiger_SG
$Rocket Lab USA, Inc.(RKLB)$ $Eos Energy Enterprises Inc.(EOSE)$ 💡📊🔥 How I Enter “Too Strong” Stocks: Pattern Memory, Gamma Triggers, and Space Force Tailwinds in $RKLB and $EOSE 🔥📊💡 I’m extremely confident this isn’t just a high-conviction chart setup. It’s a convergence of historical breakout geometry, institutional options flow, earnings volatility, and national defense tailwinds. I’m not guessing; I’m executing a thesis with multi-layered probability and real-world catalysts. 📊 $RKLB: From chart symmetry to Pentagon strategy Rocket Lab ($RKLB) reports Q2 earnings on 08Aug25 after market close. Forecasts show: • EPS: –$0.11 vs –$0.08 YoY • Revenue: $135.4M • EBIT: –$51.25M • Gross margin trend: 25.56% • Net margin: –39.18% • Analysts: 4 recommend, 7 buy, 5 hold • Price fluctuation Q2: +97.87% • Mean PT: $37.04, High PT: $51.00 Despite losses, investor positioning says otherwise. On 15Aug options expiry: • $45C: 1.10K contracts, premium $3.65, delta 0.536, gamma 0.042 • $50C: 942 contracts, premium $1.93, open interest 8.40K • Bulk buy order (15Aug $50C): 2,000 contracts, turnover $4.54M • $55C: 2,000 contracts, $2.86M turnover • Support: $28.53, Resistance: $48.63, Spot: $44.81 Gamma and vanna both steepen into the $50 to $55 cluster, showing convexity buildup. The 4H Bollinger/Keltner setup confirms: price recently tagged $56, retraced to $44, and is hugging the 55 EMA. No panic, just breathing before the next vertical. 🚀 But here’s the rocket fuel: Rocket Lab’s 2025 revenue forecast is $576M versus SpaceX’s $15.5B. Yet its $23B market cap gives it a P/S ratio of 40 compared to SpaceX’s 26. That compresses fast; by 2026, its P/S drops to 23 on projected $904M revenue. This isn’t overvalued, it’s front-loaded for expansion. 📡 Golden Dome and Victus Haze: This is not retail hype Space Force Gen. Michael Guetlein, appointed by Trump to lead Golden Dome missile defense, has already awarded $RKLB the Victus Haze contract, designed to test 24-hour responsive satellite launch and in-orbit interception. That mission launches this year. CNN reports that Guetlein, who has unique autonomy in awarding contracts, is focused on scaling space-based interceptors. He explicitly said the technical challenge isn’t the physics; it’s the industrial base. Guess who Space Command just visited? Rocket Lab. Guess who’s on Rocket Lab’s board? A retired Space Force Lt. General. This isn’t a matter of if. They’re already on the list. 📈 Projecting ahead: Neutron, Rocket Lab’s heavy-lift launch system, is projected to surpass Falcon 9’s pace. By 2035: • Over 150 cumulative launches • Just 25 first stages reused • Two launches per month pace This growth isn’t theoretical; it’s engineered. The pattern structure on the weekly chart mirrors this: a two-year base, parabolic climb, and projected continuation to $85 with wedge geometry confirming strength. 📊 $EOSE: Harmonic symmetry and structural setup strength $EOSE continues to print a near-flawless harmonic bowl breakout. The current price ($5.42) sits in a structurally sound pullback zone after touching $6.60. On the 4H chart, price is coiled between mid-Bollinger and Keltner base layers with fading volume and trend EMAs holding. This is a textbook volume-pocket reset before liftoff. The multi-year harmonic structure projects toward $46.44, and the current consolidation phase suggests trend integrity is being preserved, not broken. Analysts may not see it yet. The chart does. 🎯 Trade plan • I’m already long $RKLB with conviction. My preferred accumulation zone remains $44 to $46, breakout trigger $51, and upside target $85 • $EOSE: Buy zone $5.10 to $5.50, trigger $6.65, target $46.44 • Watch for MACD crossover, EMA hold, and volume burst above Bollinger mid-line 🧠 This is why pattern memory matters I’m systematically cataloguing historically validated breakouts that combine geometry, options mechanics, and thematic catalysts. These are the setups where risk is defined but reward is exponential. So when people ask me: How do you enter a stock that’s already gone vertical? You enter when structure compresses, vanna steepens, and contract flow reveals intent, not when the green candle confirms your fear of missing out. Which launchpad are you positioned on: $RKLB, $EOSE, or both? 📢 Don’t miss out! Like, Repost and Follow me for exclusive setups, cutting-edge trends, and insights that move markets 🚀📈 I’m obsessed with hunting down the next big movers and sharing strategies that crush it. Let’s outsmart the market and stack those gains together! 🍀 Trade like a boss! Happy trading ahead, Cheers, BC 📈🚀🍀🍀🍀 @Tiger_comments @TigerStars @Tiger_Earnings @TigerObserver @TigerWire @Tiger_SG

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment

  • Top
  • Latest
empty
No comments yet