At $1231 for $Micron Technology(MU)$ vs $194 for $NVIDIA(NVDA)$ — I'm taking NVDA every time.
Reason is simple:
NVDA = platform + ecosystem + demand lock-in.
MU = cycle + pricing power swings + higher volatility.
One is compounding its leadership in AI compute.
The other is more tied to memory cycles.
At similar "growth narrative" moments, I prefer the name with structural dominance.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
- Ah_Meng·05:55TOPThe share price has nothing to do with the market cap of individual companies. It depends on how many shares are on offer. For example, $SpaceX(SPCX)$ is $100+ however it is worth cost to a Billion dollar because it has been subdivided into lots of shares… so share prices are not an apple 🍎 to apple 🍏 comparison… be carefulLikeReport