Tech Plunged 40-57%. Micron -41%, SanDisk -57%, SpaceX -52%. Bargain Hunt or Bubble Burst?

The uncomfortable answer is neither cleanly. What just happened is not a bubble bursting the way 2000 happened, where the underlying businesses were illusions. And it is not a straightforward bargain hunt either, because some of what got priced in at the peak was genuinely ahead of the fundamentals. This is a valuation reset on real businesses, triggered by three separate catalysts converging in 72 hours.

1. Three Catalysts, Not One

SanDisk delivered nearly $9 billion in Q4 revenue, a record 84.6% gross margin, and more than $5 billion in adjusted free cash flow. Revenue and earnings both beat estimates. The stock still fell 5.4% on the day and another 7% after hours. The reason was one number: Q1 FY27 revenue guidance came in at $10.3 to $10.8 billion against Street expectations of $11.16 billion. A 5% miss on guidance for a quarter that had not even started was enough to trigger the entire sector's unwind. Dave Mazza at Roundhill had set the bar before the print: nothing short of a big beat with a bigger guide would satisfy. SanDisk delivered the beat. The guide fell short.

The second catalyst was the July payrolls report. The economy shed 23,000 jobs versus expectations of a gain of 80,000. Government payrolls fell 53,000. The labour force shrank by 264,000 and participation hit its lowest level since early 2021. A weak jobs print in isolation would have been read as reducing rate hike pressure. Landing after a guidance miss from the year's best-performing stock in an already elevated volatility environment, it amplified the move across every high-multiple tech name.

The third catalyst was SpaceX. Its first-ever quarterly earnings revealed $18.4 billion in capex, more than double expectations, with the AI segment spending $15.8 billion to generate $2.56 billion in revenue. When the most-watched IPO of the decade shows AI spending at six times the revenue it generates, the entire AI infrastructure investment thesis comes into question simultaneously.

Three events in 72 hours. Guidance miss, jobs shock, capex fear. The result was Micron down 41% from record highs, SanDisk down 57% from its June peak, SpaceX down 52% from its all-time high.

2. Are These Businesses Actually Impaired?

This is the only question that matters for the bargain hunt versus bubble burst decision.

SanDisk's business is not impaired. Record margins. Record free cash flow. Five new customer agreements signed this quarter. A $14 billion buyback expansion authorised at current prices, which is the clearest possible signal about where management thinks fair value sits. The guidance miss that caused the stock to fall was a 5% shortfall on forward guidance, not evidence of deteriorating demand. At current levels around $1,000, the stock trades at approximately 7.5 times the annualised EPS run rate implied by Q1 guidance. For a business with 84% gross margins and a sold-out order book, 7.5 times forward earnings is not a bubble number. It is the multiple you pay when the market is uncertain about whether those earnings are sustainable.

Micron is the clearest case. Its own print was exceptional. The -41% from record highs reflects sector contagion from SNDK's guidance miss and the jobs-driven risk-off rotation, not any deterioration in Micron's own numbers. The $50 billion Q4 guidance, the 85% gross margin trajectory, and zero direct Korean rate exposure remain fully intact. Micron fell because SanDisk guided conservatively. That is the entire explanation.

SpaceX is more nuanced. The business itself beat every revenue and loss metric. But $18.4 billion in quarterly capex against $2.56 billion in AI revenue is a ratio that genuinely requires investors to fund a multi-year ramp without near-term cash flow visibility. The $6.7 billion in AI contracts already signed for Q4 is the bull case anchor. Whether those contracts represent the beginning of a compounding revenue cycle or a one-time step-up is the question that does not resolve until Q3 and Q4 numbers arrive.

3. The Pick Level

SanDisk at $950 to $1,100 is the entry zone that makes sense on fundamentals. The $14 billion buyback expansion at current prices is management making the same call. The August 13 Investor Day is the next catalyst, where the full FY27 margin and revenue outlook gets framed in detail. If management presents a path to sustained 83 to 85% gross margins with expanding new business model agreements, the guidance miss narrative reverses quickly.

Micron at $680 to $750 is the cleanest risk-reward in the memory complex. Five times forward earnings on a business that just guided $50 billion for the next quarter is not expensive by any metric that has ever applied to semiconductor companies. The Korea-driven sector volatility will continue. Every BOK commentary and Iran oil headline creates noise. None of it changes Micron's own customer agreements or its order book.

SpaceX below $115 requires a different framework. This is not a trade. It is a 12 to 18 month position that requires patience through continued capex fear headlines before the AI cloud revenue confirmation arrives. Size it for what you can hold without checking the price every session.

The honest verdict: this is not a bubble burst. Samsung, Amazon, Apple, and Microsoft each independently confirmed on earnings calls that AI memory demand is accelerating, not reversing. It is a valuation reset triggered by a guidance shortfall and a jobs print landing simultaneously on stocks priced for perfection. The businesses are largely intact. The entry points have improved materially. August 13 and the July CPI print this week are the next two inflection points.

I am not a financial advisor. Trade wisely, Comrades.

# 🎁 Prize-winning essay: Technology stocks soar and plummet, bargain hunting or running for your life?

Modify on 2026-08-09 12:38

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment1

  • Top
  • Latest
  • Isleigh
    ·08-09 14:16
    In summary
    Reply
    Report