While the sharp surge in 10-year Treasury yields past 4.8% and spiking rate-hike odds (~70%) reflect real market anxiety over stickier inflation and elevated energy costs, writing off tech and AI capex completely would be premature. Market caps and valuation multiples for long-duration tech will certainly compress under higher discount rates in the short term, but cash-generative mega-caps (like Microsoft and Nvidia) fund the bulk of their massive AI infrastructure out of robust operating cash flows rather than expensive debt markets. While rotating into high-cash-flow defensive names or holding energy as a tactical hedge is a sound defensive strategy ahead of ADP and payroll data, the structural thesis and multi-year capex commitments for AI infrastructure remain heavily intact beyond short-term Fed policy swings.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
- feelond·09-03 07:22DCF sensitivity is the real pain here. For AI names, small changes in terminal assumptions get brutal fast even before the actual capex thesis breaks.LikeReport