I think infrastructure offers the clearer opportunity today, but software may ultimately capture more value.

AI infrastructure benefits first because every model and application needs compute, memory, networking, power and data centres. Demand is tangible and spending is already enormous.

But infrastructure is capital-intensive and eventually risks overcapacity and commoditisation. Software has the opposite challenge: competition is intense today, yet successful applications can scale with much lower marginal costs and become deeply embedded in business workflows.

My preference would be infrastructure while AI capex remains strong, then gradually shift attention towards software companies that demonstrate genuine pricing power, recurring revenue and measurable productivity gains.

The next big winners may not build AI. They may be the companies that figure out how to monetise it.

# Goldman Sachs Upgrades Palantir Technologies to Buy with $230 Price Target

Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.

Report

Comment

  • Top
  • Latest
empty
No comments yet