$Apple(AAPL)$ DBS Group Holdings (SGX: D05) remains a strong core holding for income and blue-chip stability, though its current valuation leaves modest room for capital appreciation in the near term. Key Fundamentals & Performance Overview Valuation & Price Target: The stock is trading near record high levels around S72.00–S74.00, with consensus analyst price targets averaging around S73.50 to S75.85, suggesting limited immediate upside potential (~0% to 2.5%). Price-to-Book (P/B) Ratio: Trading at a elevated P/B ratio relative to its historical 5-year average (~1.44x), reflecting strong premium asset quality and earnings confidence, but signaling that entry prices are currently rich. Earnings Resiliency: Net Interest Income
$Advanced Micro Devices(AMD)$ it's just simple to get money from this perfect share! Just buy low sell high! $Tesla Motors(TSLA)$ waiting this to fly again once again later! Just click buy now and hold it ya! Gogogo!
$Microsoft(MSFT)$ I mentioned this before the earnings Last week that msft is way undervalued. Despite the surge in the last few Days, it has more room to run. Don't be distracted by Its AI spending & software scare. These are noise.
Keppel (BN4) 1H2026 Earnings: Yield, Gearing, And ICR All Just Failed 🦖
Keppel (BN4) 1H2026 Earnings: Yield, Gearing, And ICR All Just Failed 🦖 🔍 I kept looking past the 25% core profit jump, because the uncomfortable part is what happens when the legacy book still sits in the same company. Keppel can grow the engine and still leave income investors with a balance sheet that does not behave like a clean yield vehicle. 💰 For CPF and SRS investors, that is the real tension here, the ordinary dividend works out to just 2.96% at S$11.49, while the consolidated leverage and interest coverage still stay under pressure. Iggy's Forensic Zone: Zone 5, Red Zone. The headline story is improving, but the cash you can actually trust is not yet clean enough for retirement income. 📺 YouTube: https://youtu.be/FElvBR4yMHU 📩 Substack: https://investingiguana.com/p/keppel-bn4-1h
Why Boeing’s Free-Cash-Flow Turnaround Is Becoming More Credible but Not Yet Complete
$Boeing(BA)$’s second-quarter performance marked another step away from crisis management and toward operational recovery. The company’s shares rose on July 28, 2026, after its results showed positive free cash flow and improving aircraft deliveries. For investors, the essential question is no longer whether Boeing has demand. Its commercial backlog already demonstrates that. The real question is whether Boeing can convert that demand into aircraft, cash and sustainable margins without triggering another quality setback. Boeing announced its second-quarter results on July 28, following the earlier release of its quarterly delivery data on July 14. Boeing’s official second-quarter delivery announcement and its investor materials provide the relevant
I’m leaning toward Option B — the Fed keeps rates unchanged through year-end. The 9–3 vote shows growing concern about inflation, but higher Treasury yields are already tightening financial conditions. Unless inflation picks up again, I think the Fed will wait for more data. I’m watching core PCE, CPI, and the labor market most closely. If inflation continues to cool and job growth slows gradually, another rate hike becomes less likely. However, persistent oil-price strength could keep inflation sticky and delay any policy easing. For investing, I expect high-growth stocks to stay volatile while yields remain elevated, whereas energy stocks could benefit from firm oil prices. I’m staying selective and focusing on companies with strong earnings rather than reacting to short-term market mov
$Apple(AAPL)$ Apple's warning matters because it comes from demand exceeding available components rather than weakening consumer demand. If memory constraints are temporary, investors may look through one or two quarters, especially given Apple's balance sheet and ability to secure supply ahead of rivals. However, if shortages persist, they can delay product shipments, pressure margins through higher procurement costs, and slow services growth by limiting new device sales. A 5% to 6% after-hours move suggests the market has already repriced much of the near-term risk. The next key question is whether suppliers such as SK Hynix, Micron and Samsung can expand advanced memory output quickly enough. If supply normalises, this is likely to be vie
July 2026 Portfolio Update: Channeling "Berkshire Time"
July 2036 portfolio gained SGD45000 or 8.3%. Dividend collection is SGD14000 year to date. During the dot-com crash of 2000, Berkshire Hathaway surged over 26% while the tech-heavy NASDAQ plummeted nearly 40%. This period perfectly illustrates "Berkshire Time"—a phenomenon where conservative, value-driven strategies shine while speculative markets crumble. My core portfolio mirrors this defensive philosophy, focusing heavily on Singapore (SG) and Hong Kong (HK) dividend-paying blue chips. To add a bit of growth potential, I maintain a smaller satellite portfolio dedicated to deeply discounted Hang Seng TECH (HS Tech) stocks. While this value-and-yield approach frequently lags behind during aggressive, growth-fueled market rallies, it proved its worth this month by successfully beating the
After Four Earnings Reports, SNDK’s Real Test Is How Big the Beat Can Be
These four earnings reports did not prove that the storage cycle is ending. If anything, they confirmed the opposite: AI data-center orders remain strong, storage prices are still rising, and supply remains tight. What has changed is the market’s scoring system. Previously, revenue growth and record profits were enough to push a stock higher. Now, even the strongest results in a company’s history can trigger a selloff if they fail to beat already-extreme consensus expectations. That is also how I view the upcoming earnings report from $SanDisk Corp.(SNDK)$ The results will probably be very strong. The problem is that “very strong” may no longer be enough. CompanyActual ResultsVersus ExpectationsMy View
SpaceX is a lottery ticket kind of stock. It defies almost every principle of sound fundamental investing. First, the valuation is always a stretch. Same story with Tesla, priced wildly above its competitors. I accept that a market leader deserves a premium, but the gap suggests something more than that. There is an Elon Musk premium embedded in the share price, and it is substantial. Second, much of what you are buying sits in the future. Colonising Mars or the Moon, data centres in space, humanoid robots. None of it is commercialised. Yet it is priced today as though it already is. That is not valuation. That is buying into a vision. So if you want to invest in Musk’s companies, you cannot use the conventional lens. Which is exactly why these stocks are so divisive. On one side, the nays
Moonshot AI’s Kimi K3 is the next Chinese name to make a splash in Western media. It ranks alongside the frontier models from Claude and ChatGPT, and that alone is a feat. The naysayers say it was achieved through distillation and the like. Maybe. But if it were that easy, every lab would be doing it and every model would be frontier class.Being frontier is one thing. Cost is another. Claude is known to be expensive. ChatGPT has managed to bring its costs down. Kimi K3 still comes in more than 50% cheaper than ChatGPT. As good as the West, at a fraction of the price. For cost conscious users, that is reason enough to switch.It also remains a few years behind its U.S. and Korean peers technologically. Strict export controls mean it cannot easily acquire extreme ultraviolet lithography equip
RZLV at $2.30: Revenue Up 20x. Stock Down 20% YTD. Something Doesn't Add Up.
$Rezolve AI(RZLV)$ That disconnect is the entire RZLV story in one sentence. Rezolve AI just reported preliminary H1 2026 revenue of $127 million, nearly 20 times higher than H1 2025. It has reaffirmed full-year guidance of $360 million. It has partnerships with TCS, Microsoft Foundry, and Zilch. Six analysts have a Strong Buy consensus with an average price target of $10.75. The stock is sitting at approximately $2.30, down 20% year to date and down 78% over three years. Either the analysts are wrong, or the market is pricing something the analysts are not. Understanding which is the only question worth answering. What Rezolve Actually Is Rezolve AI builds AI-powered commerce infrastructure. Not a chatbot. Not a search tool. The specific p
BYND at $0.56: This Is Not an Investment. It Is a Trade With a Three-Day Fuse.
$Beyond Meat, Inc.(BYND)$ At 56 cents, Beyond Meat has a market cap under $70 million, is trading 93% below its 52-week high of $7.69, is below the Nasdaq $1.00 minimum bid requirement with an August 31 delisting deadline, and reports Q2 earnings on August 5. That is three days away. The fundamentals are a disaster. The setup is genuinely interesting. Why the Business Case Is Not the Thesis Q1 2026 revenue fell 15.3% year on year to $58.2 million. Gross margin slipped from 12.8% to 10.8%. The company is burning cash with no profitability path visible through 2028 according to analyst models. The $1.1 billion in convertible notes against a sub-$70 million market cap is the structural landmine that makes this un
AXTI’s 164% Revenue Explosion: Is This the End of the "AI Bubble" Myth?
After a 100x surge in just one year, $AXT Inc(AXTI)$ reached its all-time high of $143. Barely a few months later, it had fallen back to around $60 — a maximum drawdown of over 56%. A lot of people started saying “AI is done” and “the bubble is bursting,” so of course optical names had to crash with it. But has the AI bubble actually burst? I think it’s way too early to call that. Most of the current judgment is pure emotion, completely detached from fundamentals. Everyone’s just arguing their own narrative.The real questions we should be asking are: Why did money rush for the exits right now? And more importantly for AXTI — is this just collateral damage, or is it actually a chance to reassess real value?Why did AXTI drop more than 70% whil