Oil Tops $100! Goldman Says Real Alpha in Oil Stocks?
$WTI Crude Oil - main 2604(CLmain)$ posted its biggest single-session move in years. $Brent Last Day Financial - main 2605(BZmain)$ is now near $110/bbl — up over 70% vs Q4 2025 average. Most retail traders rushed into oil ETFs. Goldman Sachs quietly dropped a note this morning suggesting that's the wrong trade.
Hormuz Disruption: 17x Larger Than the Russia Shock of 2022
The Strait of Hormuz — carrying roughly 20% of global oil and LNG supply — is effectively shut. Goldman Sachs estimates the total hit to Persian Gulf flows at 17mb/d, a disruption 17 times larger than the peak April 2022 hit to Russian oil production.
Pipeline alternatives via Saudi Arabia and UAE can theoretically redirect up to 3.6mb/d — but actual redirection over the past four days is only 0.9mb/d. The gap isn't closing.
Goldman commodities team warns oil prices could exceed 2008 and 2022 peaks if Hormuz flows remain depressed through March.
Goldman Is 38% Above Wall Street Consensus — Because the Equity Market Hasn't Caught Up to Oil Prices Yet
Here's what most traders rushing into $United States Oil Fund LP(USO)$ are missing.
Goldman just raised EU Big Oils 2026 EPS estimates by 55%, placing them 38% above Wall Street consensus — the biggest gap in years. The reason: stock prices are still anchored to old consensus numbers, while Goldman's models now reflect the actual forward curve.
Translation: the equity market hasn't repriced what oil prices are already telling you.
And unlike USO — which gives pure commodity exposure but carries contango decay risk — oil majors offer:
-
55% earnings upside baked into Goldman's revised 2026 estimates
-
Dividend + buyback yields of 8-12% at $76/bbl Brent (Goldman Exhibit 2)
-
A re-rating catalyst when the rest of Wall Street is forced to upgrade their numbers
The Stocks Goldman Is Buying (And Two They're Selling)
🇺🇸 $Exxon Mobil(XOM)$ — 20% Hormuz upstream exposure, highest earnings leverage among U.S. majors. Highest risk, highest reward in a prolonged closure scenario.
🇺🇸 $Chevron(CVX)$ — Zero direct Hormuz upstream exposure. The "defensive energy" play — full oil price upside with no production disruption risk. Goldman's preferred U.S. name if the conflict drags on.
🇬🇧 $SHELL PLC(SHEL.UK)$ — Target $99 vs current ~$83. 19% upside. Goldman Buy. 7% Hormuz upstream exposure — meaningful but manageable.
🇬🇧 $BP PLC(BP)$ — Target $44 vs current ~$39. 12% upside. Goldman Buy. 12% Hormuz exposure — slightly higher risk than Shell.
🇸🇦 Saudi Aramco — Target SR30 vs current SR26. 16% upside. Goldman Buy. The ultimate oil price beneficiary — geopolitical proximity is the obvious risk.
⚠️ Who Goldman is selling:
-
$Equinor ASA(EQNR)$ — Sell. Stock has run -22% implied downside at current price vs Goldman's target.
-
OMV — Sell. -20% implied downside. Both stocks have priced in more than even Goldman's upgraded estimates.
⚔️ USO vs Oil Majors: What's Your Pick?
The case for USO: Pure, liquid, direct commodity exposure. If Hormuz stays closed and Brent hits $130+, USO captures every dollar of upside immediately. No earnings risk, no company-specific news flow to navigate.
The case for oil stocks: Goldman is 38% above consensus on 2026 EPS. When the rest of Wall Street upgrades — and they will — stock prices have to reprice. You get oil upside plus a re-rating catalyst. Plus 8-12% shareholder returns while you wait.
Three Questions for Discussion:
-
USO or oil stocks — where would you put fresh money today, and why?
-
If Hormuz reopens next week, do you hold oil majors for the dividend re-rating thesis, or exit immediately?
-
Goldman is 38% above consensus — do you think the rest of Wall Street upgrades to meet them, or does Goldman walk back their call first?
Drop your view below — and tell us which name you're watching 👇
Comment to win Tiger Coins!
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
我在看 $雪佛龙(CVX)$ 作为防守打法 $埃克森美孚(XOM)$ 对于高风险、高回报的风险敞口。壳牌和英国石油公司看起来也很有吸引力，具有坚实的上涨空间和可控的霍尔木兹敞口，使我能够在赚取股东回报的同时抓住油价上涨。
即使霍尔木兹海峡重新开放，我也可能会持有各大公司的股息和重新评级论文。对于今天的新资金，我更喜欢精选的石油股而不是USO，同时密切关注地缘政治发展，以便在供应中断缓解或情绪急剧转变时调整头寸。
@Tiger_comments @TigerStars @TigerClub
If I put my money into USO, I am buying "oil promises" or their future contracts. If I think that the Straits of Hormuz continues to stay closed and the fireworks continue, I would bet on USO.
But if Trump's "Peace Whisper" comes true next week, then I would exit USO immediately.
My Preference: Oil stocks. My top pick is $Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund(XLE)$ which includes the Big oil giants like $Exxon Mobil(XOM)$ & $Chevron(CVX)$ . Why? Because even if the war ends, XLE will continue to pay nice juicy dividend yield of 3%. I don't have to worry about the maths of future oil contracts.
In 2026, oil is a rollercoaster. USO is sitting in the front row with no seatbelt. XLE is sitting in the back seat with seat belt on & a dividend check. Choose your seat wisely.
@Tiger_comments @TigerStars @TigerClub @CaptainTiger @Tiger_SG
The Dynamic: Goldman’s $100+ calls are often "aspirational" targets based on peak disruption; the rest of the Street is slower to move because they model long-term demand destruction.
The Likely Outcome: Goldman walks back first. History shows they lead the charge up but aggressively "normalize" their price targets the moment physical barrels start flowing again to avoid being caught on the wrong side of a crash.
The Verdict: Expect a Goldman "tactical adjustment" (downgrade) within 48 hours of any de-escalation news.
The Reaction: A reopening triggers an immediate $10–$15 "war premium" collapse; momentum traders will exit instantly.
The Dividend Thesis: If your entry price allows for a sustainable 5%+ yield at $70 Brent, you Hold; the structural shift toward capital discipline means majors won't slash payouts just because the crisis ended.
The Verdict: Hold if you are an income investor; Exit if you are playing the commodity price action.
比起美国石油基金，我更喜欢石油巨头。埃克森美孚或雪佛龙等生产商在支付股息和回购的同时受益于高原油价格。USO是一种期货工具，存在滚动成本，因此它更适合短期交易，而不是新的资本部署。
2.如果霍尔木兹重新开放
霍尔木兹海峡的重新开放可能会迅速消除地缘政治溢价，石油可能会回调。我会削减纯原油敞口，但仍持有优质专业原油，因为油价高于约80美元的强劲现金流支持股息和资产负债表。
3.高盛看涨的看涨期权
当高盛公布远高于共识的目标时，同行往往会在价格变动后逐渐升级。如果紧张局势持续下去，共识可能会上升。如果风险迅速消退，高盛可能会软化其观点。
USO(ETF)：最适合纯战术敞口；如果供应受到抑制，它会捕捉到即时的“波动峰值”，但随着时间的推移会遭受滚动衰减（期货溢价）。
石油股：最适合基本面价值；主要公司（XOM、CVX）在高油价下提供“免费”选择，同时提供3-4%的股息下限和积极的回购。
结论是：将新资金投入石油股——你可以获得等待上涨的报酬，而如果突破停滞，USO就会流失资本。
While the United States Oil Fund ($USO) provides direct commodity exposure, the analysis suggests energy stocks like $Chevron(CVX) and $SHELL PLC(SHEL.UK) offer better risk-adjusted returns due to undervalued earnings and potential re-rating.