The bullish compute thesis assumes AI capex can keep growing rapidly and, more importantly, that customers will eventually generate enough economic value from AI to justify all that infrastructure. If monetisation disappoints, hyperscalers could moderate spending surprisingly quickly.
Memory is cyclical and vulnerable to oversupply, but demand is increasingly tied to real hardware requirements. AI accelerators need large amounts of high-bandwidth memory, while servers still need DRAM and storage.
So I see memory’s risk as more about supply, pricing and cycles, whereas compute carries a bigger valuation and AI-ROI assumption.
Both can fall, but if the market starts questioning whether every extra dollar of AI capex produces adequate returns, I would be more worried about compute.
Disclaimer: Investing carries risk. This is not financial advice. The above content should not be regarded as an offer, recommendation, or solicitation on acquiring or disposing of any financial products, any associated discussions, comments, or posts by author or other users should not be considered as such either. It is solely for general information purpose only, which does not consider your own investment objectives, financial situations or needs. TTM assumes no responsibility or warranty for the accuracy and completeness of the information, investors should do their own research and may seek professional advice before investing.
