To The Moon

Confirmed high-volume breakdown High significance Intel's Friday session confirmed that the post-earnings sell-off was not confined to after-hours trading. The stock fell sharply on exceptionally high volume and closed near its session low. This is consistent with forced selling or broad institutional repositioning, but it does not prove that a durable price floor has formed. $Intel(INTC)$   What matters now 1. Extreme volume confirms capitulation-like selling, not accumulation. Friday's volume was approximately 455 million shares versus 134 million on Thursday. The stock's decline and close near its low indicate that sellers retained control into the close. The next meaningful signal would be a recovery from th

$Intel(INTC)$   Three downside zones to watch $60 - First downside test - 10% lower -  Look for selling pressure to ease, strong closes relative to intraday lows and volume contraction on subsequent declines. A break through this area would increase the likelihood of a deeper retracement. $50 - Deeper stress zone — 25% lower At this level, I would reassess Intel's earnings outlook, foundry execution, cash flow and valuation. A sharp sell-off followed by a recovery could indicate capitulation, but price alone would not confirm a floor. $45 - possible accumulation level — 32.7% lower - still not a macro floor From this point three forms of confirmation to look for bbefore committing capital - 1. Bus

$Intel(INTC)$  holding on was definitely a bad idea. Fundamentals matter and Intel is failing on multiple fronts at the moment.  $Netflix(NFLX)$  is down but not out surely as content and engagement can be worked on. Holding for now. $Direxion Daily Semiconductors Bull 3x Shares(SOXL)$  gives hope even at current level as the AI story is far from over #LessonsFromLosses

$INTC  High-significance bearish gap risk Catalyst: Q3 earnings and weaker-than-expected Q4 guidance, released 29 October US time. Intel fell sharply after hours following its earnings release. Reuters reported a decline of approximately 23%; another market-data source showed $70.86, down 23.04% from the $92.07 regular-session close. Other snapshots showed higher after-hours prices, so the exact price depends on the timestamp. Regular-session close, Oct 29 $92.07 Reported after-hours low snapshot $70.86 What the technical evidence says 1. The earnings gap is the primary signal. Confirmed: Q4 revenue guidance of $15–16 billion fell short of analyst expectations of approximately $17 billion. Intel also cited manufacturing constraints and ongoing PC-market weakness. Volume: Regular-sessi

$Direxion Daily Semiconductors Bull 3x Shares(SOXL)$ right place at right time! A little soothing balm for bearing the INTC loss so far.

$Intel(INTC)$ holding tight on this. DCA opportunity at 82-83 if 104-105 does not hold.

$INTC Strangle 260930 120.0P/121.0C$  $80 premium for the strangle in the last minutes before expiry was a bit strange to see. Guess it was a game of chicken being played expecting a wild swing based on MU earnings post market.  Anyway that was an easy winner winner chicken dinner for me today.

$Intel(INTC)$ DCA opportunity 

$Rocket Lab USA, Inc.(RKLB)$  

In scenario of a Fed rate-hike / higher-for-longer shock, the most likely impact is: gold and silver down, BTC down, and AI stocks under pressure—especially the more expensive, long-duration names. 1) What the market data is already saying The cross-asset tape is consistent with a risk-off / higher-rate reaction : Asset / Proxy Move Interpretation MSTR -4.70% Bitcoin-linked equity under pressure BITO -3.91% Bitcoin proxy selling off NVDA +0.53% Relative resilience in a strong AI leader MSFT -1.68% Broad AI / mega-cap tech pressure GOOGL -1.49% Broad AI / mega-cap tech pressure That pattern suggests the market is not pricing a clean “risk-on” outcome . The strongest immediate losers are the assets most sensitive to liquidity, discount rates, and speculative positioning . 2) Asset-by-asset i